为什么需要保护野生动物英语作文(汇集19篇)

My favorite animal is a chicken.

As it happens, my home downstairs is no. 307 to raise a few chickens. Every day, we pass these chicks are partial his head to see us.

The chicken body furry and cute. A yellow feathers like wearing a yellow dress. The chicken has a pair of sharp mouth. Round eyes also pretty mentally?

I dont see their ears, but the chicken could not have no ears. If no ears, that we walk past, how they head, look at us with a partial?

Mother said that newly hatched chicks also can only eat a small grain of rice, cant eat corn or maize, and gave them drink water regularly. If there are bugs to eat them. Theyll grow more air.

How much I love these cute chicks. But mom and dad said cant keep now, dont keep good, they will die.

我最喜欢的小动物是小鸡。

恰好，我家楼下307号就养了几只小鸡。每天我们经过时，这些小鸡都偏着脑袋看我们哩。

小鸡全身毛茸茸的，很可爱。一身黄黄的羽毛像披着一件金黄的礼服。小鸡有一双尖尖的小嘴。圆圆的眼睛看人时还蛮有精神的呢。

我没看到它们的耳朵，但是小鸡不可能没有耳朵。如果没有耳朵的话，那我们走过去时，它们怎么会偏着脑袋朝我们瞧呢?

妈妈说，刚孵出的小鸡还只能吃小米粒，不能吃谷子或玉米，还要经常给它们喝水。要是有小虫子给它们吃，它们一定会长得更神气。

我多喜欢这些可爱的小鸡呀。但是爸爸妈妈说现在还不能养，不养好的话，它们会死的。

Environmental problems are being more and more serious all over the world。

For example， cars have made the air unhealthy for people to breathe and

poisonous gas is given off by factories。 Trees on the hills have been cut down

and waste water is being poured continuously into rivers。Furthermore， wherever

we go today， we can find rubbish carelessly disposed。 Pollution is， in fact，

threatening our existence。

The earth is our home and we have the duty to take care of it for ourselves

and for our later generations。 Fortunately， more and more people have realized

these problems。 Measures have been taken to cope with these problems by the

government。 Laws have been passed to stop pollution。 I hope the problem will be

solved in the near future and our home will bee better and better。

Live in the dense forest, many small animals. Every spring they hold a grand acrobatics competition. This years competition is very busy, small animals came to the venue early and took out his magic sauce.

First of all, beautiful peacock dances: he head high head, chest, belly on tail slowly, gently shake the feathers; His head from time to time is to the east, west, the fan tail like a gorgeous colorful dress, and tightly attracted the audiences eyes.

Then, the dog show Riding on the swing. See his jump, jump to the swing, both hands hold the rope. He first gently swinging back and forth a few, and then make sufficient strength, flaring, his superb action see person dazzled.

The most wonderful for its black bear on wood pellets. Heavy black bear carefully standing on wood pellets above board, feet or so back and forth to keep balance. Wood ball turning around, but he firmly when local, not nervous. You see, his right hand on the waist, left hand waving to the crowd. His wonderful performance won applause...

The annual acrobatics competition ended, but the animals good show, for a long, long time also by forest residents are talking about.

茂密的森林里，生活着许多小动物。他们每到春天都要举办一次盛大的杂技比赛。今年的比赛更是热闹非凡，小动物们早早来到会场，纷纷拿出自己的绝活儿。

首先，漂亮的孔雀表演舞蹈：他昂着头、挺着胸，慢慢地展开尾巴，轻轻抖动着羽毛;他的头时而摆向东、时而摇向西，那条扇子似的尾巴像一件绚丽的七彩衣，紧紧 吸引着观众的眼神。

接着，小狗表演 荡秋千。只见他纵身一跃，跳到秋千上，双手紧紧抓住绳子。他先是轻轻地荡了几个来回，然后就使足劲，直冲云宵，他高超的动作看得人眼花缭乱。

最精彩的要数黑熊踩木球了。笨重的黑熊小心翼翼地站在木球上面的木板上，双脚左右来回摆动以保持平衡。木球转动着，他却稳稳当当地、丝毫不紧张。你看，他右手插在腰上，左手挥舞着向观众致敬。他精彩的表演博得阵阵掌声……

一年一度的杂技比赛结束了，但动物们精彩的表演，很久很久还被森林的居民们谈论着。

and to stop any environmental pollution. Therefore, governments are playing the most important role in the environmental protection today.

In my opinion, to protect environment, the government must take even more concrete measures. First, it should let people fully realize the importance of environmental protection through education. Second, much more efforts should be made to put the population planning policy into practice, because more people means more people means more pollution. Finally, those who destroy the environment intentionally should be severely punished. We should let them know that destroying environment means destroying mankind themselves.

I have a dog ,her name is Happy,I very love her.Her is clever and friendly.She loves to walk with me.She always plays with my grandmother,so I think is smart.I also like talking to her,she can understand every words which are said by me.

1. To cherish the enviroment is to love ourselves.

爱护环境就是爱护我们自己。

2.Water is the source of ourlives

水是生命之源。

3.I make an urgent appeal that measures should be taken to cope with the situation

我急切呼吁应该采取措施改变现状。

4.Our government is doing its best to take measures to fight against pollution.

我们政府正努力制定措施与污染作斗争。

5.We are sure that well win the battle.

我们坚信我们能赢得战斗。

6.Its high time that we should protect our enviroment from being polluted.

是时候我们应该防止环境污染了。

7. Keep our mountains green，the wate clean，and the sky blue.

使我们山更绿，水更清，天更蓝。

8.However，natural resources are not inexhaustible.some reserves are already on the brink of exhaustion.

然而自然资源并不是无穷无尽的，一些储量已经到了穷尽的边缘。

9.If we do something with no thought for the furture . The later generation would be in danger.

如果我们不为将来考虑，后代就会受到威胁。

10.Our earths days are numbered without urgent help.

没有及时的帮助我们的地球就屈指可数了。

11(Sth.)are bound to generate severe consequences if we keep turning a blink eye to them.

如果我们继续睁一只眼闭一只眼的话，……一定会有恶劣的后果。

导语：动物是人类的朋友，可是每天都有着很多的动物被人类消灭，但是这依然动摇不了我们保护小动物的决心，下面和小编一起来看看动物英语作文：Snakes。希望对大家有所帮助。

Snakes蛇

The snake is a long and thin animal that lives in grass or other dark places. A snake has no legs or feet, but it can move very fast on its stomach. Snakes usually have green, yellow or black skins, which make them difficult for their enemies to find them.Some kinds of snakes live in water. They can swim as freely as fish.

蛇是一种又长又瘦的动物，生活在草丛里和阴暗的地方、蛇没有腿和脚，靠胃部飞快的移动前进。 蛇常常有绿色，黄色和黑色的皮肤，使得敌人很难找到他们。

Snakes are cold-blooded animals. In winter they hibernatein holes which are narrow enough only to hold the snakes bodies. The snakes can sleep through a whole winter without eating and moving. They can not feel any pain. The hibernation period lasts about five months. When spring comes, the snakes come out and begin their normal life.

蛇是冷血动物，在冬天，它们通常隐藏在只能容下它们身体的狭小的小洞里。蛇可以不吃东西，不移动地睡一整个冬天。它们不会感觉到痛苦，它们的隐藏时期持续大概5个月。当春天来临的时候，蛇就会出现并开始它们的正常活动。

Snakes can take many things as food, such as mice, sparrows, frogs,birds eggs, pests and so on. People sometimes can see a snake eat a sparrow. First it moves close to the sparrow, then it puts out its tongue and brings the sparrow into its mouth and swallows it, which makes a lump in the snakes body. After some time the lump disappears.

许多东西都可以成为蛇的食物，就像老鼠，麻雀，青蛙，鸟蛋和害虫等等。人们常常看见蛇吃麻雀，蛇首先靠近麻雀，然后伸出它的舌头把麻雀带进它的嘴巴里并吞下去。麻雀就像一块肿瘤一样突出在蛇的身体里，但是过了一段时间就会被消化消失。

As snakes are dreadful-looking, people are afraid of them. Many people drive them away whenever they see snakes. But in Chinese fairy tales, snakes are by no means bad. They seem to have human feelings. They can change into pretty girls. People like and respect them. The most well-known is the story about the White Snake and the Blue Snake.

因为蛇看起来很可怕，所以人们总是害怕它们，很多人每当看到蛇的时候都会把它们赶走。但是，在中国的神话故事里，蛇并不代表坏人，它们可以感觉到人类的想法，它们会变成美丽的女生，人们喜欢和尊重它们。最著名的故事就是白蛇与青蛇的故事了。

In fact, snakes are not as dreadful as they look. They can help us to kill mice and pests. They can provide us with delicious meat. Their blood is a good drink. Poisonous snakes are especially useful. We can make valuable drugs with them.

事实上，蛇并不是像它的样子那么可怕，它们可以帮助我们杀死老鼠和害虫，它们可以给我们做成美味的佳肴，它们的血是很好的饮料。毒蛇就特别有用处了，我们可用它们做成珍贵的药品。

[动物英语作文：Snakes

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

"Bumper harvest, bumper harvest!"!" Cried one of the fishermen, happily jumping up like a child. After a while, the full cabin fish alive and kicking, calm sea filled with coming from all sides of the fishermens laughter.........

Now, like this "fish and shrimp full cabin" scene has been very rare. In todays market, is the most common fish pound at least to dozens of yuan, more serious pollution of the ocean, the ocean resources gradually dried up, seafood production, prices rise, it illustrates this point?

In the ocean of natural calamities and man-made misfortunes emerge in an endless stream today, human pollution is often not from the original intention, but it is caused by the unexpected effect. The British Petroleum oil, because the drilling platform explosion, caused by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, to 9900 square kilometers of sea water is seriously polluted, so that tens of thousands of seabirds soaked in oil to move, die in hunger and misery, makes countless fish poisoning death; and the Japanese earthquake and tsunami triggered a nuclear leak the marine pollution is more serious......

The sea is so vast that it is because the rivers and streams flow into the Yangtze River and then run into the sea. If we do not solve the pollution problem from the source, then no matter how people clean up the sea, there will always be sewage flowing into the sea, and all the efforts will be futile. Now, streams and streams are often seriously polluted, or they become places where people dump rubbish or are loaded with pesticide cans. Finding a clear stream in an inhabited area can be very difficult today!

In any case, the protection of the oceans can not be achieved by individual forces, and the protection of the oceans depends on the joint efforts of all mankind. I do not want one day in the future, our descendants can only imagine the image of the vast and wide sea.

This is not only the wish of a pupil, but also the wish of all mankind, isnt it?

Dear Lily:

I think you had better feed a hamster,the trediest kind of pet these days is the small hamster. People like them because they are quiet and clean. I have a hamster named Tom,it’s very cute and easy to take care of,and it’s cheaper than rabbits or cats,so I bought it. She’s my best company,because she reads books and litens to music with me every night.However,life with a hamster isn’t always perfect,she sometimes noisy at night ,she love sleep all day,too. So,sometimes she is very boring! How do you think?

ladies and gentlemen, i want to say something about trees. as we know now trees are very important to human beings. first of all, they benefit our health.

they send out oxygen for us to breathe. we cant live without trees.secondly, trees can beautify our environment.as trees are so important, we must do our best to protect them. we must enforce the tree protection laws. we must plant as many trees as possible.only in this way can we live happily in the beautiful world.

[保护环境为题目的英语作文

In the animal world, I most like the cheetah.

The cheetahs really brave. Its flat and smooth, short ears. Two eyes like two, twinkle. There are two prominent muscle in on either side of the face, white, with small black spots, bead point of steel needle of a root beard. There is a a black spots. In addition to the belly is white, the remaining parts of the hair is golden. Its streamline, the whole body presents for sprinting. Its limbs is very rich, full of flexibility. Cheetahs paw is straight, can firmly in the ground, change the running direction. And it is the long tail, can have the effect of acceleration while on the run.

The running speed of cheetah is very surprising, speed is about 130 kilometers per hour, with fast on the highway running car.

But, its endurance is poor, high speed running is limited to a few seconds, so has been hailed as a sprint champion.

Cheetahs hunting is also very interesting. When it found that the deer would be around to look at the first, and see what the intruder. If not, it is with lightning speed to recover to the prey. Easily catch later, it will pull the prey to the grass, enjoy the meal. If the prey in a tree, it jump into the tree to catch the prey, big eat a meal.

The cheetah is really a lovable animals! But, now is trying to catch some criminals for their own interests cheetah, continue like this, will destroy the cheetah. Please act to protect it together.

在动物世界里，我最喜欢猎豹了。

猎豹长得真威猛。它的头平而滑，耳朵短短的。两只眼睛像铜铃一般，炯炯有神。脸的两边有两块突出的肌肉，白白的，上面有一粒粒小黑点，点上有一根根钢针般的胡须。身上有一个一个黑色的斑点。除了肚皮是白色的，其余部位的毛都是金黄色的。它的整个身躯呈现流线形，适合急速奔跑。它的四肢非常发达，富有弹性。猎豹的爪子比较直，能牢牢地巴住地面，改变奔跑方向。而它的那条长长的尾巴，在奔跑时能起到加速的作用呢。

猎豹的奔跑速度很是惊人，每小时的速度大约有130千米，跟高速公路上飞速奔跑的车子差不多。

但是，它的耐力差，高速奔跑只限于几秒钟，所以被誉为短跑冠军。

猎豹捕食也很有意思。当它发现鹿时，先会向四周观察一下，看看有什么不速之客。如果没有，它就以闪电般的速度向猎物追去。轻而易举地捉住之后，它就把猎物拖到草丛中，美美地饱餐一顿。如果猎物在树上，它就跳到树上把猎物给逮住，大吃一顿。

猎豹真是一种讨人喜欢的动物啊!可是，现在有些不法分子为了自身的利益在大肆抓捕猎豹，再这样下去，猎豹会灭绝的。请大家行动起来，一起来保护它吧。

保护动物，是我们人人都要做到的，许多人任意去猎杀动物，虽然现在的人都说要保护动物，但是还有很多顽固的人不听，继续猎杀动物，导致许多动物都在没绝，同时人类还拿动物来观赏、卖钱，用兽皮做大衣……但你们有没有想过，如果你是一只动物，却遭到了人类的猎杀，你会怎么想，你愿意吗，你愿意被猎杀吗？你绝对不愿意，有些人说：“我又不是动物。”但你们有没有想过动物们会怎么想吗？现在人类大量捕杀动物，动物会甘心吗？不，不会，永远不会。它们有千千万万的不愿意。

有些人虽然知道怎样去爱护动物，可是他们只会假惺惺地去教育别人，而自己却照样破坏环境，猎杀动物，照样兴致勃勃的品尝动物上的鲜美的肉味。就拿我们身边的小狗来说，虽然不是国家一二级别的珍贵的动物，但也是我们身边的好仆人，不管主人怎么使唤它，它仍然很兢兢业业，可是人类看见小狗的肉鲜美，人们还是捕杀小狗，如果当时人们有保护动物意识的话，就不会造成这样的事了。

还有鲸，鲸不是让你们随意捕杀的，鲸是被杀掉一头就死一头的，不像小鱼小虾那样多，如果我们把鲸杀掉了，那我们的子孙后代，他们不是看不到鲸这种动物吗？也不曾知道有过鲸这样庞然大物的动物的存在。

现在，有些动物已经灭绝了，就拿快要灭绝的鳄鱼来说，虽然很凶猛，但人类更凶猛。就是因为有些动物身上的器官具有突出的经济价值，由此成为被人类掠夺利用的对象，成为动物灭绝的主要因素。鳄鱼长着锐利的牙齿，和硕大的食物胃口，我们都说鳄鱼可怕，但鳄鱼更怕人类，在人类的眼中，鳄鱼皮可以制成行李箱，手提包，钱包，鞋等物品，所以鳄鱼，现在已经成为快要灭绝的动物了。

朋友们，动物的大量毁灭对人类将产生严重的不良后果，造成生态环境严重不平衡，从而使人类的生存环境遭到破坏。消灭动物，就是在消灭人类自己，如果有一天世界上的动物全都消失了，那人类还能生存吗？要保护动物，珍惜这自然界里的每一个生灵吧！让我们从现在做起，从我做起，保护动物，使世界变得更美好吧！保护动物，就是保护人类自己。

As time goes by, man is making the earth sick. People cut down too many trees and leave rubbish everywhere. Factories let out their waste without doing anything to it . This has caused some serious problems. Such as the land is sandy, the river is dirty, the air is less clean, even the temperature of the earth is rising. What should we do to save the earth ? My suggestion is that we should plant more trees, put rubbish into dusbins and stop factories (from)pouring waste directly into the air or rivers. In all, we have only one earth, we should do our best to protect it, or we will regret.

保护动物保护环境的作文篇一

动物与我们人类一样，有思想，有感情，也有它们自己的生活方式，更有自由权。

我们在未经动物们的同意之下就随意破坏它们的栖息地；在未经它们的同意之下就随意伤害它们的躯体；在未经它们的同意之下就私自决定它们的死亡。我们是否有考虑过它们的感受，是否有想过它们的想法，是否想过他们的生命什么时候终结是有他们本身决定的呢。

我们人类现在正提倡珍爱生命，爱惜生活。我们人类的生命很珍贵，难道动物的命就不值得珍惜么。或许我们人类也有不想死但是没有选择权利的时候，但是这样的事情毕竟是少数啊。我们就不能把动物当成是我们人类的一份子，当成我们的朋友，当成我们的家人一样对待么。

我们现在的生活水平越来越高，信息越来越发达，对物质生活与精神生活的要求也越来越高。但是我们的物质生活中可否将“食用野生动物对身体有好处”这一条去掉呢。现在有说吃野生动物可以长命的；也有说吃野生动物有营养的；更有人说吃野生动物对大脑有好处的。我想这个可能是对的，但是人类不能盲从，有些动物体内是有致癌物质的。

况且不说这个，就算野生动物吃了对我们有好处，但是人类有没有想过，当我们在尽情的虐杀它们的时候，我们人类的死期也快临近了呢？我想只要是读过书的人都对“生物链”这个词不陌生吧？一旦生物链被破坏，就意味着生物大家族会以最快的速度在地球上消失，最终人类也会落到死的下场。等到人类得到报应的时候，恐怕已经没有挽回的余地了吧？谁都知道一句至理名言——世界上是没有后悔药买的。为什么知道这句话，就不能去思考一下，去想一下，去实行一下呢？只要我们时刻记着这句话，时刻想着要去把它实践下去，当我们在餐桌上看到那无辜的生物的时候，还会开开心心的想要把它们吃下去吗？还会犯这么天大的错误么？

201x年的“世界末日”会不会发生还不一定，但是我们如果不保护好我们的环境，保护好我们珍贵的野生动植物，恐怕世界末日会不会发生就会由不确定变成肯定了吧。

现在全球的动植物物种正在以最大的速度从地球上消失，有时候甚至每分钟都会消失一个物种。如果再以这样的趋势进行下去，人类难道不会消失么人类难道就不能设想一下吗难道就不能为以后做下打算么？难道就不能为后代打算一下么难道就不能为人类的长远发展做下打算么？我们现在的生活幸福美满，不求吃穿，信息高速发达，这些都是我们的祖先留下来的，这些都是他们辛苦努力奋斗得来的。作为后代，难道我们要把他们的成果就这样毁于一旦么？我们后代就这么没有素质么？一定要把他们的成绩毁灭么？

地球就这样毁灭，人类难道不会觉得可惜么？

所以，为了人类的长远发展，好好珍惜保护野生动物，珍惜我们美满的生活，把祖先留下的成果进一步发展下去。

保护动物保护环境的作文篇二：

我们要保护野生动物，因为我们保护野生动物，野生动物对我们人类也会很友好。

比如说燕子，燕子能帮我们把田里的害虫吃掉。如果我们人类杀害捕捉它们，它们会吃掉那些常常来搔扰我们的蚊子，让我们更好地生活吗没有了燕子，我们的周围变得很多害虫，这些害虫对我们人类有很大的坏处呀!

我还举个例子。比如说青蛙，青蛙也能帮我们吃田里的害虫，可以说是田里的警察。我们支捕杀他们，一旦没有了青蛙，田里的害虫越来越多，害虫不断地吃菜，难道我们会有美好的丰收吗

我还举个例子。比如说啄木鸟，啄木鸟是森林中的医生，它可以帮我们吃掉树里的害虫，让树恢复健康。我们杀害它们，树木的害虫会越来越多，树木会慢慢地减少。地球上没有树，会发洪水、地震。

我最后举个例子。比如说猫头鹰，猫头鹰捉田鼠，是对我们人类有好处的，人类却常常捕猎它们。没有猫头鹰，田鼠会增加。田鼠吃的庄稼和菜就更多了，我们人类一样没有好的收成。

所以，我们要保护以上的动物。同时，我们还要保护其他的野生动物!

我非常喜欢《我的野生动物朋友》这本书。它是1990年出生于非洲的法国小女孩蒂皮写的。蒂皮从小跟拍摄野生动物的父母在丛林里长大，与非洲野生动物和当地土著人生活在一起。

她非常喜爱野生动物朋友们。用她自己的话说：“我呢，爱鸟爱得不得了。我说爱得不得了，一点儿也不夸张，因为它们就像我的兄弟姐妹一样。这也没有什么出奇的，因为我就在它们当中出生，长大。非洲的野生动物是我最早的朋友，我对它们了解得可清楚了……”

蒂皮说：“我真不明白，人类为什么要杀死野生动物，真是荒唐极了……”是啊，野生动物并非是我们的敌人，而是我们不可缺少的好朋友。我们人类为什么要伤害它们呢听说，有些地方的猎人为了更容易地捕杀森林中的猎物，不惜烧毁森林，杀死被烈焰逼得惊慌失措的动物。这样一来，不久以后，原本的森林就会变成了一片沙漠;还有些偷猎者猎杀国家保护动大熊猫、东北虎、藏羚羊和猎豹，只是为了用它们的皮毛换些钱……这样的事例还有很多很多。

当然，也不是所有的人都像刚才所说的那些人一样，现在有了动物保护协会，而且也有不少有爱心的人经常救助和收养一些动物。这样一来，就有不少动物得到了保护。

不管怎样，我希望大家都来保护动物。动物也是有感情的，它们受到人类的伤害也会伤心。而且地球不光是人类的，也是动物们的，它是我们人类和动物们共同的家园。我们没有权利夺走动物们的自由，动物们的家园。我们应该尊重每一个生命，保护动物就是保护我们自己。

篇三：保护鸟类人人有责

鸟类是我们人类的朋友，它给我们的生活增添了无穷乐趣。

地球上没有鸟类，人类将会遭到灾害，一些有害的昆虫，小兽就会繁殖许多后代，把郁郁葱葱的树木和碧绿碧绿的草原一食而空。地球上的动物及我们人类就会失去食物。

猫头鹰是“捕鼠能手”它有一双铜铃似的眼睛，能在夜间看到极小的东西，还有一对能听到细小声音的耳朵。它一个夏季可捕到1000只田鼠。

啄木鸟是“森林大夫”，有像听诊器一样的钢嘴，通过敲打树木听声音，就能准确判断捕捉到害虫。像这样的益鸟，还有许多。

所以，我们每个人都要有责任，爱护鸟类，爱护我们的朋友。

The national level protection animal giant panda, have you ever seen giant pandas? Come and see! The following is a lovely giant panda, see how delicious it eats! The smile is so lovely.

You said, why so little panda, it is because of the destruction of the human disorderly cut down trees, dont take care of flowers and plants, destruction of the atmosphere, to lead to a drop in the panda, so we have to take care of the panda, the giant panda is herbivorous animals know, likes eating bamboo, but not as the giant pandas in the zoo keepers to feed their fruit. Wild panda anecdotes: in recent years, scientists found hidden cameras, male wild pandas left a breath marks on a tree, will lift a leg, like a male dog, and then the urine to the heights of the tree and. The higher the urine, the higher the social status of the male giant panda. Good play! Just like a dog! This is fun. Ax mountain in north of the city, we established a lush bamboo sea and the forest, form different from downtown chengdu "microclimate", in 1987, formally completed, now has developed into a specialized in endangered wildlife research and breeding, protection of education and education tourism, a nonprofit organization.

Do you know how pandas digest bamboo? Researchers have found that the giant pandas digestive tract is short and simple, and there is no such thing as a long, plant-eating animal with a thin gut and a complex stomach or a developed cecum. In addition, the giant pandas genome sequences announced in 2009, after they found the giant panda to the lack of some help in the digestive tract herbivores digest cellulose and hemicellulose (they are the main components of the fibrous plant diet) enzymes. This is confusing for researchers, and how does the lack of these necessary conditions digest bamboo?

Researchers use of gene sequencing technology, analysis of more than 5000 ribosomal RNA sequences, eventually in the giant panda, found a variety of digestive tract bacteria and some microbes are very similar to grazing animals. These help animals digest cellulose in their bodies, and seven of them are unique to the pandas digestive tract. Bye bye!

今天放学的时候，同学们正在教室里收拾书包，突然有一只小鸟飞进了教室。调皮王石亮看到了，便大声喊了起来：“大家快来看啊！有一只小鸟！”边说边跑过去把小鸟捉住了。大家都闻声而来，班长少文看到了，便对石亮说：“石亮，快把小鸟放了！别让小鸟难受。”石亮捉着小鸟，对少文说：“我为什么要听你的话，我捉住了就是我的，我要把它带回家饲养。”说着拿起书包就要往外走。刚好老师走进教室，石亮看到老师来了吓了一跳，赶紧把小鸟藏在身后。这时班长少文走到老师面前，向老师说明了情况后。老师走到石亮面前，说：“石亮，我们必须保护动物，如果人人都像你一样，看到了动物就捉起来，视为己有的话，那么世界上的动物，不就都没有了吗？”石亮听完老师的话后，惭愧极了，于是当众把小鸟放了，得到了老师的夸奖。从这件事中使我了解小学生还必须多认识保护小动物的知识。学校必须注重小学生对保护动物的认识，多教小学生一些关于保护动物的小知识。我相信只要这样做，不久人和动物一定能够和睦相处。

My eyes followed the crawling insects, made a fantastic travel.

I follow this time is a little, it is considered that the humble little ants. I found it is on the roof of my house. I stared at it, it is in a few big between the block - this is a few flower POTS, stop and take a walk from time to time, as if already to find food, and like around the tentacles ask partner to find food. Several times, all of a sudden it stopped at a corner. It is found a piece of bread.

Around it to go out with his companions tentacles, and soon the companions. Follow it to move the bread, they lift up and down, as if not enough. One ant ran out and soon it was with a lot of ants, they unite together to put the bread up to the front of a small hole. But not like bread is too big to carry into the hole so Im worried about them! But they sent men guarded the bread and the rest of the people went in the hole, then they seem to please the queen, then they called a lot of ants are coming. They were together, seem to be talking about something, then the queen to eat bread, wait to feed the queen, the rest of the ants cheerful a clean sweep of the rest of the bread.

Ants can really know the unity and cooperation, compared with the unity of the ants, we humans do not have them so much!

如果你是一只动物，却遭到了人类的猎杀，你会怎么想，你愿意吗，你愿意被猎杀吗?你绝对不愿意，有些人说：“我又不是动物。”但你们有没有想过动物们会怎么想吗?现在人类大量捕杀动物，动物会甘心吗?不，不会，永远不会。它们不愿意死在人类手里。它们愿意被你们猎杀吗?不，它们有一千个不愿意，一万个不愿意，一亿个不愿意……

有些人虽然知道怎样去爱护动物，可是他们只会假惺惺地去教育别人，而自己却照样破坏环境，照样兴致勃勃品尝野味。就拿印度洋毛里求斯群岛上生活的渡渡鸟来说，由于它身上的肉鲜美无比，所以遭到当时人类的大量捕食，在十七世纪就已告灭绝。但是如果当时人们有动物保护意识的话，就不会造成渡渡鸟的灭绝。

还有鲸，鲸不是让你们随意捕杀的，鲸是被杀掉一头就死一头的，不像小鱼小虾那样多，如果我们把鲸杀掉了，那我们的子孙后代，他们不是看不到鲸这种动物吗?

现在，有些动物已经灭绝了，鳄鱼虽然凶猛，但人类更凶猛。就是因为有些动物身上的器官具有突出的经济价值，由此成为被人类掠夺利用的对象，成为动物灭绝的主要因素。鳄鱼长着锐利的牙齿，和硕大的食物胃口，我们都说鳄鱼可怕，但鳄鱼更怕人类，在人类的眼中，鳄鱼皮可以制成行李箱，手提包，钱包，鞋等物品，所以鳄鱼，现在已经成为快要灭绝的动物了。

《金色的脚印》，这篇文章讲了正太郎家捉来了一只小狐狸，两只老狐狸想尽办法就救出小狐狸，正太郎很同情小狐狸，他偷偷地给老狐狸投送食物，于是，他们之间建立了亲密，信任的关系，后来两只老狐狸救了正太郎，最后，小狐狸回归了大自然，两只老狐狸是多么高兴!这篇文章赞美了人与动物之间互相信任，互相帮助，和谐相处的美好关系，也展现了动物之间的浓浓亲情。我们就要向正太郎学习，他帮助动物，动物也救了他，这样不是很好么?为什么人们还是要捕杀动物呢?

在此，我呼吁人们，不要再破坏自然界中的花草树木，不要再乱杀一禽一兽，不要再杀害我们的朋友，要保护好自然界中的一个个生灵。消灭动物，就是在消灭人类自己。如果有一天世界上的动物全都消失了，那人类还能生存吗?要保护动物，珍惜这自然界里的每一个生灵吧。

朋友们，动物是大自然留给人类的无价之宝，它是我们人类的朋友。它们的生衍死灭与我们人类的生活是密切相关的。动物的大量毁灭对人类将产生严重的不良后果，造成生态严重不平衡，从而使人类的生存环境遭到破坏。让我们从现在做起，从我做起，保护动物，使世界变得更美好吧!保护动物，就是保护人类自己!

Protection of the Environment

Once man did not have to think about the protection of his environment. There were few people on the earth, and natural resources seemed to be unlimited.

Today things are different. The world has become too crowded. We are using up our natural resources,and polluting our environment with dangerous chemicals. If we continue to do this, human life on earth will not survive.

We realize that if too many fish are taken from the sea, there will soon be none left. Yet,with modern fishing methods, more and more fish are caught.We know that if too many trees are cut down, forests will disappear. Yet, we continue to use powerful machines to cut down more and more trees. We see that if rivers are polluted with waste products, we will die. Yet, waste products are

still put into rivers.

We know that if the population continues to rise at the present rate, in a few years, there wont be enough food.What can we do to solve these problems?

If we eat more vegetables and less meat, there will be more food available. Land for crops feeds five times more people than land where animals are kept.

Our natural resources will last longer if we learn to recycie them.

The world population will not rise so quickly if people use modern methods of birth control.

Finally, if we educate people to think about the problems we shall have a better and cleaner planet in the future.

[保护环境的英语作文精选