爱情小说《傲慢与偏见》英语读后感（通用20篇）

Vivid Heroine

——On Sister Carrie

Carrie was such an ordinary rural girl at the beginning of the story. Sitting on the seat of a bus, she couldn’t help feeling exciting at the sight of the metropolis’ spectacle. She was impressed deeply by large crowd on the avenue, the spacious square or tall buildings.

Far more different from other heroines, Carrie was not a plain pure angel like Snow-white, nor was she brave enough to be a heroine of revolutionist or even a reformer, nor was she so clever as to be a successful career woman who start from scratch.

What attracted her most, after her entering this huge metropolis was the incredible fineries, fashion shoes, smart handbags displaying in the shop windows, the jewellerys shining brightly behind the glass. She dreamed that one day, she could wear all of these, jogging gracefully into the most luxurious hotel with focused sights of admiration.

And this was not merely a dream. Because she had large eyes which can earn others’ sympathy, even love. She had wonderful figure which can win others’ hearts. However, anything she got, anywhere she reached, had not come from her ambition. Things happened, and then she accepted. That’s what she had just done — just to accept willingly from the bottom of her heart. She was not at all an evil woman who would give anything for the fortune or fame. However, she would give uo something for a better life when her instinct defeated her intellect.

That was Carrie, a girl had her own desire, a human being just like many others in the realistic world.

There’s one sentence written in chapter VIII:” When this jangle of free-will instinct shall have been adjusted, when perfect understanding has given the former the power to replace the latter entirely, man will no longer vary.” However, how many people can go that further.

And I want to quote another sentence to wind up my essay:

“In Carrie — as in how many of our wordings do they not? — instinct and reason, desire and understanding, were at war for the mastery.”

"Father and son" is a humorous cartoon. I have read the book three times.

When I first read the book, my mother heard the laughter coming from the study room. Indeed, the book is very interesting, and father and son often make jokes. For example, "sunset map": his father is a bald. One day, father read a newspaper on the sofa. The son called his companion, and showed him half the bald head of his sofa as a sunset, drawing on the sofa, and adding a picture frame. The father suddenly turned, and the setting sun had eyebrows, eyes, whiskers, ears. Father humor, simple, kind and playful, son smart, naive, cute and naughty, these two characters are very popular with everyone.

The second time I read this book, I felt the deep affection between father and son. One of the comic stories goes like this: the father and his son go to the seaside for a holiday. The son found a lot of pebbles on the beach and threw stones into the sea until he could not find any stones. Father saw, in the evening, pushing the car, over and over to the seaside to transport stones. The second day, the son found a pile of stones piled on the beach, very happy. My father was pleased to see it. I carefully observed fifth cartoons, found his father for his son to transport a pebble, sweat a lot. My father did everything for his son, and his son loved his father. He also made me cry.

When I read the book third times, I went abroad to combine the preface to know that E O Plauen created the father and son in the dark age when the Nazi fascist ruled germany. This warm, touching the cartoons was in the years of turmoil of creation, he is really a positive and optimistic person, is a person who is very loving son. He is a good painter concerned. He did not like some people in order to save life and property and surrender to the Nazis, he boldly created anti Nazi cartoons. But such a master of humour was mercilessly killed by the evil fascist. I think, while we praise the father and the son, we should praise their Creator, egypt. Austria. Rauen.

I read three times "father and son", and every time there was a new discovery. I hope I read every good book.

[父与子的读后感英语

最近，美国大选闹得沸沸扬扬，尤其是特朗普与希拉里的口水战，双方极尽所能，互相攻击，你来我去的，更是让观众看得“过瘾”，最终，特朗普取得出乎意料的胜利，着实让各位看客唏嘘不已。

美国大选，是西方资本主义民主最重要的体现。资本主义制度从十六世纪开始至今，已历经大约五百年，五百年的荣辱兴盛，它的体制理念，早已深深植入每一个国民的血液里，主宰着他们的一言一行。《我的叔叔于勒》中的菲利普夫妇就是其中的一个缩影。

这几天我在上《我的叔叔于勒》这篇课文，这是我第二次研读此文，感触也更加不同。此文是法国著名的短篇小说巨匠莫泊桑最著名的小说名篇之一。这篇文章主要写“我”一家人在去哲尔赛岛途中，巧遇于勒经过，刻画了菲利普夫妇在发现富于勒变成穷于勒的时候的不同表现和心理，通过菲利普夫妇对待于勒的不同态度，揭示并讽刺了在阶级社会中，人与人之间关系的疏远情形。故事不长，却耐人寻味。

“贫居闹市无人问，富在深山有远亲。”文中的菲利普夫妇就是这样的人。他们身上体现了资本主义社会中小人物的悲哀，无奈，挣扎和企盼。他们从没试着去改变命运，而是把一切的希望寄托在一个不切实际的于勒身上，或许，他们只能如此，这也是他们最大的悲哀-------平静的接受命运的安排。

在这个物欲横流的社会里，像菲利普夫妇那样的人却也不少见。

在食品里添加各种色素，添加剂，甚至许许多多形形色色的工业原料，为了谋取私利，不惜一切手段，“金钱至上”的观念支配着他们的一切行为。这是一种精神的缺失，一种关注内心的缺失，急功近利的物质主义者。

我想，无论我们身处何时何地，我们更该关注我们的内心世界，以清丽的双眼凝眸世界，用爱与责任铸造生命的意义，谱写新世纪的辉煌。因为，金钱并不是万能的，拥有亲情、友情……才是最重要的，也才是最幸福的。

《白鹿原》这本书是我的导师去年暑假推荐给我阅读的，当时只读了刘震云的《一句顶一万句》，却并没有把这本书放在心上。因为看过电影，觉得不过尔尔。最近听同专业的姐姐读说读起来不错，又没有心情做其他的事，不如拿来读读，权当消磨时间。

很多时候满心的期待会落空，而无心的偶遇却能撞出火花，恰如这本书，翻开以后简直停不下来。因为是在kindle上读的，我并不知道书有多厚，就一直读一直读，结果读了俩周才读完，百度了下说有50万字。不知道有多少字，却读完了，假如开头就知道书有这么厚，不知道我还有没有开始读的勇气和读完的信心。所以说无知有时候真的会催生勇气，恰如我们老话说的“无知无畏”。

二

电影给我的印象就是白鹿原上所有的男人都围着田小娥一个女人转的荒诞，好像田小娥是主角，人们看完电影以后大概脑子里也只剩下田小娥这个勾人的女子。原著并不是这样，每个人的生平都是一条线，而很多线交织在一起结成了一面巨大的网络，在从清末到新中国解放的动荡背景里，白鹿原上白鹿两大家族的三代人的兴衰更替以及白鹿原相关人民的生活，反映出了当时不同阶层百姓的生活状况和意识形态的转变。真的，很震撼，直指人心。

下面就几个典型的角色，谈下自己的理解。先说男性吧

白嘉轩：作为白鹿原的族长，最典型的特征便是挺的太直的腰。所谓相由心生，腰杆子便是他的坚持和原则。作为族长他主持公道，作为家长严惩逆子，作为长辈又能在晚辈回头时表现出胸襟，遇事不慌，遭劫不乱，不围观热闹，不落井下石，活在自己的坚持里，非常值得人钦佩。甚至在在整个族人跪求为田小娥修庙时，他也能断然拒绝，改为建塔镇鬼，他相信邪不胜正，足够强大的信仰支持他经历种种磨难成为一位平和的老者，见证着白鹿原的兴衰，他为人做事的胸襟确值得我们去借鉴。

不过太直是不是真的好，如果当初他容得下黑娃和田小娥，让他们进祠堂祭拜，黑娃是否会成为土匪，田小娥是否落得人尽可夫的下场，惨死在窑洞里呢?

鹿子霖：作为鹿姓的领头羊，白鹿原的乡约终在晚年落得一个疯癫的下场。他好色，好权，见机行事，是男人劣根性的一个集中体现，和白嘉轩形成了一个鲜明的对比。每一种选择都是一种人生，自己做下的孽没人揭发却终在自己心里溃堤，自食了恶果。

鹿三：白嘉轩的长工，亲如兄弟。正直，善良，仁义，有股子倔劲头，也正是这股子倔劲，他带领百姓闹事抗税，拒绝儿子和儿媳田小娥入家门，并最后杀死了田小娥。他心里是有愧的吧，田小娥的死终化成了他自己的疯癫以及老年的痴傻。

能伸能屈方得另一片天地。儿子黑娃在改过自新后，仍未得到父亲的原谅，是俩人的悲哀。

黑娃：从小调皮机灵，却不爱读书。长大后不想像父亲一样在别人眼皮子底下求生存，便外出做长工。在割麦时和主家的姨太偷情，被驱逐。回到家不被父亲和族里接纳，住进了村边废弃的窑洞。后来和共产党鹿兆鹏联系上，成为早期的农村武装斗争。这里携着自己的报复，将乡绅们进行了惩治。后来革命失败，落草为寇，并敲断了白嘉轩挺直的腰板，泄愤。再后来被招安，成为国民党的保安司令，却不再为非作歹。在娶了第二方媳妇儿后，收了性子跟随朱先生学读书，成为地下党，在革命后却被白孝文诬陷，没能躲过杀身之祸。

黑娃具有反叛意识，豪爽，和他爸爸鹿三一样耿直，最终也因为这耿直丢了性命。幸运的是这里有他的成长，从一名土匪到保家卫国的共产党，从泼皮无赖到严于律己的读书人，这一些列的蜕变非常可贵。从他的经历也可以对中国共产党的发展过程，略见一斑。

鹿兆鹏：早起的革命家，忠诚坚韧的共产党，也是具有坚定信仰的青年人的代表，因为自己的革命导致了家族的衰落和悲剧。其抗婚、后私自娶白灵等都可见当时现金青年的意识形态转变过程，有可敬也有可恨之处，毕竟太过自私，为了自己的信仰，牺牲了全家和媳妇儿的幸福。

鹿兆海：生性耿直，加入国民政府的军队，成长为一名军官，没倒在日本人的枪下，却倒在了两党内战的血泊里，对当时的时代背景有所映射。

白孝文：白嘉轩的大儿子，他和黑娃有共同点，都堕落过，又都重新做人，不同的是黑娃变得更加坦荡，严于修身，他却变的更加阴毒，只为夺权，可以做人上人。作为白家的长子，活在强大的父亲的阴影下，竟然不举，这是父亲留给的阴影。在受到田小娥的挑逗后，压抑的一面暴露出来，卖房卖地，抛妻弃子，只为和田小娥享受欲仙欲死的生活。在饥荒的年景，落了讨饭的下场，在被人羞辱后，却机缘巧合到了保安队。再生的机会，让他利用自己的才智迅速成长，只为雪耻。革命前投诚和黑娃一起投诚，胜利后却窃取了革命的果实，将真正的革命人杀害，阴毒至此，令人唏嘘。

本性不同，有人经过磨难的洗涤，更加磊落强大;有人却将疼痛刻在心里，更加阴险只为报复，同是成长，结果却终是殊途。

朱先生：关中大儒“牛兆濂”是其原型，在动荡的背景下，尽自己一力护相邻平安。能劝民从善，能使兵退策反，能投笔高呼宣战，能埋首乡野著书，他是关中知识分子的代表，高深的学识，在愚昧的众人里得到了神话。他的存在如白鹿原上的白鹿，是一种灵性的寄托，是无助栖遑的百姓的寄托。其做人做事，做学问的方法都值得借鉴。

正如关学领袖张载所言：为天地立心，为生民立命，为往圣继绝学，为万世开太平，这是一个知识分子的修养与追求。

男性中还有药房的冷先生，白孝武、土匪头郑芒、叛变的岳国维、兔娃等不再展开来说，每个人都是当时时代背景下一类人的缩影，都是人性的体现，或好或坏引人深思。

书中最典型的，让读者印象深刻的女性大概田小娥莫属了，但是其他女性的存在同样值得深思。让我觉得遗憾的是，男人中有蜕变和成长，女性却没有，出场时的样子和离场时的样子是一样的，淫荡的依然淫荡，保守的仍旧保守，先进的始终先进，只是作为一种存在吧。

田小娥：是所有男人欲望宣泄的对象，是欲望的化身，死后还是婊子的代言人。可她到底做错了什么?她只是在当时的环境下，选择自己想要的幸福，女人就一定要等着被选择吗?从跟着老地主到跟黑娃偷情，从和黑娃在一起到不被接受，以至于黑娃逃走，和鹿子琳私通，勾搭白孝文等等，是一个苦命女人挣扎后的堕落。想救自己的丈夫不得，却只能委身他人，有自己欲望的满足，也有一个女人的无奈。

是低眉顺眼屈从女性，反抗的代表，却又是一个漂亮风尘女子的堕落。凡事有度，这是一个女人的悲剧，也是很多女人的悲剧。

白灵：白嘉轩的独女，从小被宠着护着，上学堂，读新学，机灵、英气的和其他女子不一样，不想围着锅台纺车旋转，自小便另辟一片天地。和父亲决裂、参加共产党，是新时期觉醒女性的代表，也是早起共产党人下场的代表。

有信仰，能坚持，这么有灵气的女子，被活埋了真是可惜。

鹿兆鹏的原配妻子：丈夫在被迫娶她回家后，生活便锁紧了这一方庭院。丈夫的拒绝和逃离，终铸成了她的悲剧。在被公公调戏后，终日的苦闷得不到宣泄，发疯后病死。

这是一个低眉顺眼的听从父母之命，媒妁之言的女子的悲剧，一生都在等，等着丈夫归来，等着别人来解脱自己这种冷暴力的生活，却等疯了。等死了。如果她意识到兆鹏不想要她后，不在乎吃人的礼数，果断离开这个家，寻自己的幸福去，一切都会不同。

其他的女性还有白嘉轩的妻子、朱先生妻子、皮匠妻子、等这些传统女性，为家为夫操持辛劳的形象，也闪现了传统女子身上的光芒。

正如书里白嘉轩所说的，一个女人对家庭的影响很大，娶个贤惠的媳妇能领着男人走上正途，黑娃娶了田小娥日子过烂包了，娶了个识文断字、知书达理的女人竟然跟随朱先生念书。女子还是要提升自身的修养，能出主意，能有坚持，自然会影响到一个家庭的兴衰。

三

这是在白鹿原这片土地上铺陈开的画卷，几代人的更迭和兴衰，有他们的选择，有我的思考。

Was reading the big fish’s smell of blood is smelled by one crowd of shark fish, struggled swims snatches the food, old person’s left hand happen to in the convulsions, he only could use the right hand, with wooden stick， the mouth and so on all was allowed to use for the weapon self-defense which attacked, and finally expelled this crowd of shark fish. But the big fish’s meat was already eaten one most, but the old person also charmingly criticized oneself the left hand " this work time actually was resting " time, I also was subdued by the old person optimistic spirit. In the life, some losses are inevitable, we should treat by the optimistic manner, cannot be calculating.

Finally, the novel sees by one youth the senior fisherman fully has 18 foot long big marlin in the measure, once more described this fish’s hugeness, explained senior fisherman overcomes the difficulty was big, non- was more common than.

The novel eulogized the spirit which the senior fisherman fear hard and dangerous diligently did not struggle, we also should like his such, could not satisfy the present situation, should positively to above, do any matter all is relentless, meets difficultly must welcome difficultly above, could give up halfway in no way. Only has this, we only then can obtain a bigger success and the victory.

《傲慢与偏见》是英国著名女作家简·奥斯丁的代表作，这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，作品描写傲慢的单身青年达西与偏见的二小姐伊丽莎白、富裕的单身贵族，彬格莱与贤淑的大小姐吉英之间的感情纠葛。其实这本书，在初一时已经接触过了，但当时对于剧情的繁杂很没有耐心，看了几章就没有了兴致，便一直搁在一旁，直至今日才重新拾起。不过再看开头几章时还是觉得很无趣，到后来明白才这里是在为以后的情景埋伏笔。一眨眼，三十几章已经过去了，人物的性格也很明显地被作者刻画出来了。

这本书中似乎只有两种人：聪明的和愚蠢的，没有绝对的好坏之分，骗子韦翰也许除外。他利用了自己巧妙的奉承能力以及一付“讨人喜欢”的仪表，迷住了伊丽莎白，不停地为自己洗刷冤情，中伤达西。可笑他的话里充满破绽，而聪明过人的伊丽莎白虽能与彬格来小姐辩驳，与咖苔琳夫人顶撞，却还是被韦翰牵着鼻子走。说实话，我并不认为伊丽莎白被骗说明他是一个”愚人”。人，总是先入为主，达西先生傲慢、无礼的样子早已进入伊丽莎白的头脑，还怎么对他产生好感?对于旁人的点评又怎能轻易的置若罔闻?对达西产生偏见是很正常的。我说的旁人自然就是指相貌堂堂的韦翰了。不可否认，韦翰长着一张英俊的脸，表面上也装得非常”绅士”。虽有”人不可貌相”、”知人知面不知心”之说可就连我这个活在二十一世纪，以旁观者的身份看这个故事，仍然对韦翰产生好感，又岂能怨伊丽莎白这一个生活在过去时代的姑娘?合上这本书，仔细地品味一番，方才发现，整部小说，之所以吸引人，完全是因为它轻松幽默的格调。伊丽莎白的嘲笑讽刺，正将那些自视绅士、淑女的贵族的本来面目暴露无疑。而伊丽莎白的父亲班纳特先生竟然以嘲笑太太、女儿为家庭快乐，幸哉?不幸哉?

文中的所谓「傲慢」就是指出身富贵、教养颇高、眼光锐利的青年达西的个性弱点;而所谓「偏见」是指出身中产阶级、教养颇好、机智聪明的小姐-伊丽莎白的精神弱点。一个眼光锐利，一个机智聪明，都属人中杰，但却都难免人性的弱点的纠缠。他们在一次的家庭舞会上初次见面，却因对彼此的印象不佳，一个态度傲慢，另一个心怀偏见。第一个印象先入为主，以后又加上女人们在旁闲言碎语，而造成了两人之间的爱恨情仇。伊丽莎白曾对达西说过:“我们的性情非常相似,我们都不爱交际,沉默寡言,不愿开口,除非我们会说出话来语惊四座,像格言一样具有光彩,流传千古.”就是因为这思想上的一致,才在婚姻中百般受到阻碍,同时也是因为这才最后促成美满的婚姻.伊丽莎白:如果放到现实社会,可能是个女权主义者.但关心自己的姐妹.直接,偶尔不懂礼节,调皮一点.却是这样迷住了达西.最重要的是善于和敢于像比自己身份高的人说“不”。从小说看，伊丽莎白聪敏机智，有胆识，有远见，有很强的自尊心，并善于思考问题。就当时一个待嫁闺中的小姐来讲，这是难能可贵的。正是由于这种品质，才使她在爱情问题上有独立的主见，并导致她与达西组成美满的家庭。

这部小说中通过班耐特五个女儿对待终身大事的不同处理，表现出乡镇中产阶级家庭出身的少女对婚姻爱情问题的不同态度，从而反映了作者本人的婚姻观:为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的;而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。因此，她既反对为金钱而结婚，也反对把婚姻当儿戏。她强调理想婚姻的重要性，并把男女双方感情作为缔结理想婚姻的基石。书中的女主人公伊丽莎白出身于小地主家庭，为富豪子弟达西所热爱。达西不顾门第和财富的差距，向她求婚，却遭到拒绝。伊丽莎白对他的误会和偏见是一个原因，但主要的是她讨厌他的傲慢。因为达西的这种傲慢实际上是地位差异的反映，只要存在这种傲慢，他与伊丽莎白之间就不可能有共同的思想感情，也不可能有理想的婚姻。以后伊丽莎白亲眼观察了达西的为人处世和一系列所作所为，特别是看到他改变了过去那种骄傲自负的神态，消除了对他的误会和偏见，从而与他缔结了美满姻缘。伊丽莎白对达西先后几次求婚的不同态度，实际上反映了女性对人格独立和平等权利的追求。这是伊丽莎白这一人物形象的进步意义。

作品生动的反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。其社会风情画似的小说不仅在当时吸引着广大的读者，实至今日，仍给读者以独特的艺术享受。她是第一个现实地描绘日常平凡生活中平凡恩的小说家，在英国小说史上起了承上启下的作用。奥斯丁的小说尽管题材比较狭窄，故事相当平淡，但是她善於在日常平凡事物中塑造鲜明的人物形象，不论是伊丽莎白、达西那种作者认为值得肯定的人物，还是魏克翰、柯林斯这类遭到讽刺挖苦的对象，都写得真实动人。同时，奥斯丁的语言是经过锤炼的，她在对话艺术上讲究幽默、讽刺，常以风趣诙谐的语言烘托人物的性格特徵。这种艺术创新使她的作品具有自己的特色。傲慢与偏见正是文字魔力结合感情升华的最佳表现。若说《红楼梦》是东方的贵妇人.《傲慢与偏见》则是西方的清秀佳人。

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodnecould conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodneis omnipotent yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me the nature of goodneis one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodneis to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodneis an utterly worthleperson. On the contrary as the famous saying goes ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’ he who is with goodneundoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodnein humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’ they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay ‘Goodness of all virtues and dignities of the mind is the greatest being the character of the Deity and without it man is a busy mischievous wretched thing no better than a kind of vermin.’

夜幕降临，华灯初上。风姑娘在我的身旁，微微起舞，赠送于我愉悦的心情。夏天的酷热早已伴随着太阳的离去消散得无影无踪。

不知何时，我的身旁站着一对老人。

他们应该是夫妻。“回家吧，儿子他们还在等着我们回去吃饭呢。”老婆婆开了口。那老伯二话不说，牵着爱妻的手，拄着拐杖，一步一步的往家的方向前行。我猜想，那老伯伯年轻时一定是最温情的丈夫。爱就像甘醇的美酒，不会随着岁月的流逝变质，反而会变得更加甘醇，更加清香。

我想起了我的爸爸妈妈。父母的爱情很普通，初遇——相知——相恋——相爱，然后步入婚姻的殿堂。没有现在年轻人那么轰轰烈烈的爱情。母亲性子稍微强势，父亲温和。每逢父亲

被母亲数落，他总是一笑置之，却也从不曾像其他男人那样说自己的妻子啰嗦。

我曾经问过父亲：你觉得你这一生做得最成功的一件事是什么?他笑了笑，望着厨房的方向，对我说：“我这辈子最成功的事，就是娶了你的妈妈，我的妻子。”话音刚落，母亲便从厨房走出，泪光微微闪烁，脸颊似有些通红。

我连忙跑进房间，不做他们之间那几万伏的大灯泡。

有一次，父亲受了伤，生活基本没办法自理。母亲忙前忙后，既要照顾家中的生意，也要照顾父亲与我。

经常忙得脚不沾地，却从没有一丝怨言。我也问过她：“妈，你累吗?”我的母亲沉默了许久，淡淡的说了一句话：他，是我的丈夫，是我的爱人。我觉得母亲好似没有回答我的问题，可好像又回答了。父母亲的爱情，我觉得可以换回几个成语：平平淡淡，相濡以沫，同甘共苦，苦尽甘来。

我有一个非常喜欢的作家，在她的文章中说过一段话：“米的左右有两个弓，代表了两个在岁月里慢慢变老的恋人。在一起的日子久了，激情退去，爱情转变为亲情。昔日挺拔的身姿渐渐弯成驼背。但他们依然还能被柴米油盐粘在一起，这就是生活。爱情融进生活里，好比是在熬粥。熬出来的粥好不好吃，全在熬粥的那个人。”怪不得，妈妈做的粥总是那么好吃，母亲原来是把对父亲的爱熬进粥里。

《小王子》是法国作家安托万·德·圣·埃克苏佩里于1942年写成的著名儿童文学短篇小说。下面，小编为大家分享《小王子》读后感英语版，希望对大家有所帮助！

Title: The Little Prince

Author: Antoine de St-Exupery

Main Characters: The little prince， the pilot， the rose， the fox， the snake， etc。

Despite I’ve not in my childhood yet， I still prefer reading fairy-tale stories。 The tales， which accompany with me in my old days， often make me think of some precious experience and sensation which only belong to children。 This summer I’ve review this kind of tale， which was published in 1940。 It’s the world-famous fairy-tale by the French author， Antoine de St-Exupery， The Little Prince。

As many other fairy-tales， the outline of The Little Prince is not very complex。 “I”， the narrator of the story， is a pilot whose plane has something wrong and lands in the Sahara。 In this occasion， the pilot makes the acquaintance of the little prince， a little boy from another planet， the Asteroid B612。 The little prince has escaped from his tiny planet， because he has some quarrel with a rose， which grows on his planet。 In that case he left his own planet and took an exploration at some neighbor asteroids。

On his all-alone journey， the little prince meets different kinds of people， which includes a king， a conceited man， a tippler， a businessman， a lamplighter and a geographer。 From these people he gets a conclusion that the grown-ups are very odd。 Following the instruction of the geographer， he descends in the Sahara， on the earth。

Traveling on the earth， the little prince， who sees a garden of five-thousand roses， is overcome with astonishment and sadness， as he considers his rose is unique in the universe before。 At that time a fox appears。 The fox， who tell the little prince about the meaning of the word “tame”， becomes his new friend。 At the time to say farewell， the fox makes him know that his rose is unique because she is his rose and tamed by him。 From that the little prince begins to treasure friendship and be responsible to his rose。

At the anniversary day of his descent of the earth， rejecting the pilot’s advice， he goes back to his own planet by bite of a snake。 “It’s too far。 I can not carry this body with me。 It’s too heavy。” he said。 He tells his friend， the pilot， he must be responsible for his rose， so he has to go back。 At the end the author doesn’t tell us the ending directly。 Maybe it’s more significant for us to imagine， and for more， think over。

One of the important characters is the rose。 Growing on the planet， she is very beautiful， but her coquetry and vanity suffer the little prince a lot。 In spite of they love each other， he soon becomes unhappy。 On the time of his departure， he just knows she certainly loves him。 The character of the little prince actually represents the children， and their native thoughts and deeds。 On the contrary， the inhabitants on the other planets， such as the king， the businessman and the conceited man， they also reflect the defects in the grown-up’s world。 The real theme of this fairy-tale with a little sadness， I guess， is the consequence of pure love and friendship in our lives， but not others “matters of consequence” of the grown-ups。

[《小王子》读后感英语版

As human thought essence of classic books, has always been in learning and reference model, is also a kind of cultural inheritance of obligatory. Substance rather than as a kind of operation as well as an exchange, collision of ideas about the original author. This column provides people with a large number of classics of substance material, hope everyone here can find the same spark, more exchanges.

With a day after reading the "dear Andre, give me the biggest shock was the book about the description of the parent-child communication, Chinese children who in my this seems novel and incomparable education and the means of independent-minded, I find everything new and fresh, that both adult road, there is no lack of again the childs extreme, is both wise and farsighted humor, does not lose childlike Andre is left a very deep impression on me. Andre in the book of life is full of fun, he drink, chat, listening to music, Party, travel... It is colorful, colorful, take a look at our student life: get up early, go to school in a hurry, endless homework, dont finish all kinds of cram school on... , even if it does happen occasionally brief relaxation and entertainment, also are in a hurry, dragonflies water, never enjoy, are far worse than Andre freedom and comfortable several miles; Andre met with setbacks, mom lung ying-tai to comfort him, and when we meet with this situation, we are often harvest is an alliance of parents and teachers scold; Andre success, mother, brother and his friend will send congratulations for him, but never take it for granted, our success is not surprising that, even in the teachers and parents eyes forever is so insignificant, far from their expectations. ...... Is this the difference between eastern and western education idea?

作为人类思想精华的名著书籍，一直都是大家在学习和参考的典范，也是一种文化传承的必修课。读后感与其看做是种作业还不如看做是一次对于原著作者的思想交流、碰撞。本栏目为大家提供了大量的名著读后感资料，希望大家在这里能找到相同的火花，多交流。

用了一天读完了《亲爱的安德烈》，给我的最大震撼是书中那些关于父母与子女的沟通的描述，那些在我这样的中国孩子看来新奇无比的教育且见解独到的方式，令我耳目一新，那个既有成人的老道，又不乏孩子的偏激，既睿智幽默，又不失天真烂漫的安德烈更是给我留下了非常深刻的印象。书中的安德烈的生活充满了乐趣，他喝酒、聊天、听歌、开Party、旅行……，简直是五光十色，丰富多彩，再来看看我们学生时代的生活：早早地起床、匆匆忙忙地上学、没完没了地做作业、上不完的各种补习班……，即使偶尔也有短暂的放松和娱乐，也大多是来去匆匆，蜻蜓点水，从来无法尽兴，比起安德烈的自由和惬意差得何止十万八千里;安德烈遇到了挫折，妈妈龙应台来安慰他，而当我们遇到这种情况时，却往往收获的是家长和老师的联合斥责;安德烈成功时，妈妈、弟弟和朋友会为他送去衷心的祝贺，但我们取得的成功却永远是理所当然，不足为奇，甚至在老师和家长眼睛里永远是那样微不足道，与他们的期望相距甚远。……这难道就是东西方教育理念的不同吗?

《百万英镑》是马克.吐温写的一篇中篇幽默讽刺小说。本文故事是，一位公务员出海时在公海中迷了路，被救起后随船到了英国。在英国他成了流浪汉，因为一次两名富翁打赌，给他了一张100万英镑整的钞票，看他可不可以养活自己一个月。因为无法证明钞票归他所有，他一开始不敢花，后来实在饿得没有办法，拿钞票去饭店试试，结果店老板认为他是个富翁，允许他欠账，还想送给他东西，讨好他。结果他用这种方式，弄够了所有生活用品，还和别人合作赚了30万英镑。

这篇文章讽刺了那些以貌取人、见钱眼开的人。这些人见对方有钱，就甘愿为对方服务，而对于对方虚实，一概不问。他们这类人为金钱服务，信奉 “金钱万能”。这种人若变多，就会助长“金钱万能”这种社会风气的形成，金钱会异化成为人们的唯一动力。当前我们身边社会，也有这种习气的存在。从大处说，去年曾有某造纸工厂排污不达标一次用120万元买断全年的罚款，从小处说，找人办事送礼成风也是这种习气的体现。因此，我们不能信奉“金钱万能”，而且凡遇到事情，应该从本质着眼，看清事物的真相，而不应只看表面，不应盲从。

When I was a middle school student, I’ve finished this book in Chinese.But when I read it in English,I really gain something new both in the way of expression and the spirit it shows to us.May be different ages to read the same book we will learn different things from it.At least, for my part, that is true.

Firstly,I would like to review some information about this book.Such as the background,major characters and the topic of it.

The Old Man and the Sea is a story by Ernest Hemingway, written in Cuba in 1951 and published in 1952. It was the last major work of fiction to be produced by Hemingway and published in his lifetime. One of his most famous works, it centers upon Santiago, an aging Cuban fisherman who struggles with a giant marlin far out in the Gulf Stream.

The Old Man and the Sea served to reinvigorate Hemingways literary reputation and prompted a reexamination of his entire body of work. The novella was initially received with much popularity; it restored many readers confidence in Hemingways capability as an author. Its publisher, Scribners, on an early dust jacket, called the novella a "new classic," and many critics favorably compared it with such works as William Faulkners "The Bear" and Herman Melvilles Moby-Dick.

This book gives me a deep impression especially the description about the man’s braveness and persistence.

In this book, in order to suggest the profundity of the old man’s sacrifice and the glory that derives from it, Hemingway purposefully likens Santiago to Christ, who, according to Christian theology, gave his life for the greater glory of humankind. Crucifixion imagery is the most noticeable way in which Hemingway creates the symbolic parallel between Santiago and Christ. When Santiago’s palms are first cut by his fishing line, the reader cannot help but think of Christ suffering his stigmata. Later, when the sharks arrive, Hemingway portrays the old man as a crucified martyr, saying that he makes a noise similar to that of a man having nails driven through his hands. Furthermore, the image of the old man struggling up the hill with his mast across his shoulders recalls Christ’s march toward Calvary. Even the position in which Santiago collapses on his bed—face down with his arms out straight and the palms of his hands up—brings to mind the image of Christ suffering on the cross. Hemingway employs these images in the final pages of the novella in order to link Santiago to Christ, who exemplified transcendence by turning loss into gain, defeat into triumph, and even death into renewed life.

The major characters in this book are also vivid and lively.

Santiago?,the old man of the novella’s title, Santiago is a Cuban fisherman who has had an extended run of bad luck. Despite his expertise, he has been unable to catch a fish for eighty-four days. He is humble, yet exhibits a justified pride in his abilities. His knowledge of the sea and its creatures, and of his craft, is unparalleled and helps him preserve a sense of hope regardless of circumstance.

The marlin?,Santiago hooks the marlin, which we learn at the end of the novella measures eighteen feet, on the first afternoon of his fishing expedition. Manolin?,a boy presumably in his adolescence, Manolin is Santiago’s apprentice and devoted attendant. The old man first took him out on a boat when he was merely five years old. Due to Santiago’s recent bad luck, Manolin’s parents have forced the boy to go out on a different fishing boat. Manolin, however, still cares deeply for the old man, to whom he continues to look as a mentor.

Joe DiMaggio, although DiMaggio never appears in the novel, he plays a significant role nonetheless. Santiago worships him as a model of strength and commitment, and his thoughts turn toward DiMaggio whenever he needs to reassure himself of his own strength. Perico ?,Perico, the reader assumes, owns the bodega in Santiago’s village. He never appears in the novel, but he serves an important role in the fisherman’s life by providing him with newspapers that report the baseball scores. This act establishes him as a kind man who helps the aging Santiago.

Martin,like Perico, Martin, a café owner in Santiago’s village, does not appear in the story. The reader learns of him through Manolin, who often goes to Martin for Santiago’s supper. As the old man says, Martin is a man of frequent kindness who deserves to be repaid.

From the very first paragraph, Santiago is characterized as someone struggling against defeat. He has gone eighty-four days without catching a fish—he will soon pass his own record of eighty-seven days. Almost as a reminder of Santiago’s struggle, the sail of his skiff resembles “the flag of permanent defeat.” But the old man refuses defeat at every turn: he resolves to sail out beyond the other fishermen to where the biggest fish promise to be. He lands the marlin, tying his record of eighty-seven days after a brutal three-day fight, and he continues to ward off sharks from stealing his prey, even though he knows the battle is useless.

Because Santiago is pitted against the creatures of the sea, some readers choose to view the tale as a chronicle of man’s battle against the natural world, but the novella is, more accurately, the story of man’s place within nature. Both Santiago and the marlin display qualities of pride, honor, and bravery, and both are subject to the same eternal law: they must kill or be killed. As Santiago reflects when he watches the weary warbler fly toward shore, where it will inevitably meet the hawk, the world is filled with predators, and no living thing can escape the inevitable struggle that will lead to its death. Santiago lives according to his own observation: “man is not made for defeat . . . [a] man can be destroyed but not defeated.” In Hemingway’s portrait of the world, death is inevitable, but the best men (and animals) will nonetheless refuse to give in to its power. Accordingly, man and fish will struggle to the death, just as hungry sharks will lay waste to an old man’s trophy catch.

The novel suggests that it is possible to transcend this natural law. In fact, the very inevitability of destruction creates the terms that allow a worthy man or beast to transcend it. It is precisely through the effort to battle the inevitable that a man can prove himself. Indeed, a man can prove this determination over and over through the worthiness of the opponents he chooses to face. Santiago finds the marlin worthy of a fight, just as he once found “the great negro of Cienfuegos” worthy. HSantiago, though destroyed at the end of the novella, is never defeated. Instead, he emerges as a hero. Santiago’s struggle does not enable him to change man’s place in the world. Rather, it enables him to meet his most dignified destiny.

While it is certainly true that Santiago’s eighty-four-day run of bad luck is an affront to his pride as a masterful fisherman, and that his attempt to bear out his skills by sailing far into the gulf waters leads to disaster, Hemingway does not condemn his protagonist for being full of pride. On the contrary, Santiago stands as proof that pride motivates men to greatness. Because the old man acknowledges that he killed the mighty marlin largely out of pride, and because his capture of the marlin leads in turn to his heroic transcendence of defeat, pride becomes the source of Santiago’s greatest strength. Without a ferocious sense of pride, that battle would never have been fought, or more likely, it would have been abandoned before the end.

Santiago’s pride also motivates his desire to transcend the destructive forces of nature. Throughout the novel, no matter how baleful his circumstances become, the old man exhibits an unflagging determination to catch the marlin and bring it to shore. When the first shark arrives, Santiago’s resolve is mentioned twice in the space of just a few paragraphs. Even if the old man had returned with the marlin intact, his moment of glory, like the marlin’s meat, would have been short-lived. The glory and honor Santiago accrues comes not from his battle itself but from his pride and determination to fight.

Santiago dreams his pleasant dream of the lions at play on the beaches of Africa three times. The first time is the night before he departs on his three-day fishing expedition, the second occurs when he sleeps on the boat for a few hours in the middle of his struggle with the marlin, and the third takes place at the very end of the book. In fact, the sober promise of the triumph and regeneration with which the novella closes is supported by the final image of the lions. Because Santiago associates the lions with his youth, the dream suggests the circular nature of life. Additionally, because Santiago imagines the lions, fierce predators, playing, his dream suggests a harmony between the opposing forces—life and death, love and hate, destruction and regeneration—of nature.

This book gives me courage of conquering all kinds of difficulties .And I have the belief that the most beautiful thing is the process that we make our best to achieve our dream,and never say give up .

开展“不忘初心、牢记使命”主题教育，守初心是要牢牢把握的总要求之一。守初心，与人民风雨同舟、血脉相通、生死与共，这是一个走过近百年风雨的大党的力量所在，更是我们不惧任何风险挑战的底气所在。

守初心，当以百姓心为心，牢记人民群众是根与本。树高千尺不忘根，人行万里不忘本。任何时候，开展任何工作，共产党人都不能脱离群众、轻视群众、漠视群众疾苦。当好人民公仆，做称职的勤务员，就要常怀敬民、忧民、爱民的赤子之心，把人民放在心中最高位置，自觉同人民想在一起、干在一起。

守初心，当以百姓心为心，牢记人民的满意度是标尺。“政之所兴在顺民心，政之所废在逆民心。”忠诚为民、尽职尽责，要求党的各级干部把人民满意不满意、高兴不高兴、答应不答应、赞成不赞成作为衡量一切工作的根本标准，以造福人民为最大政绩。只有扎扎实实为民服务解难题、一心一意为民谋利促发展，才能赢得人民支持和拥护，团结带领人民创造更加幸福美好的生活。

我们作为基层党员干部，要积极学习、主动预热，学习第一批开展的好经验好做法，打牢开展“不忘初心、牢记使命”主题教育的思想基础。

一要学好典型案例。习近平总书记在“不忘初心、牢记使命”主题教育工作会议上强调：“要宣传正面典型，宣传党员干部身边可信可学的先进人物”。要用身边事教育身边人，把各村各行业的好党员发掘出来，不断增强主题教育的时效性和感染力。

二要学好重要讲话。要结合工作实际，持续深入学习习近平总书记视察山西重要讲话、在推动中部地区崛起工作座谈会上的讲话、关于信访工作的重要论述等，深刻理解其核心要义和实践要求，找准目标、对标一流，不断提升自己的理论水平和工作能力。

三要学好原文原理。年轻干部必须具备扎实的理论功底，要利用好学习强国等网络阵地，深入学习党的十九大报告和党章，系统学习《习近平关于“不忘初心、牢记使命”重要论述摘编》和《学习纲要》等篇目，进一步坚定对马克思主义和中国特色社会主义的信仰信念，切实增强“四个意识”、坚定“四个自信”、坚决做到“两个维护”。

初心和使命是我们党应对挑战的思想武器。中国特色社会主义进入新时代，我国发展仍处于重要战略机遇期，前景十分光明，但挑战也十分严峻，更需要登高望远、居安思危。

“最初我们来到这个世界，是因为不得不来;最终我们离开这个世界，是因为不得不走。”记得多年前的深夜我合上《活着》那墨黑的封面，满口尽是苦涩，眼泪汩汩而出。福贵用他的一生告诉我：平淡是福，活着真好。

《活着》是一本让人沉重的小说。福贵说:“做人还是平常点好，争这个争那个，争来争去赔了自己的命。像我这样说起来是越混越没出息，可寿命长，我认识的人一个挨着一个死去我还活着。”家道中落的悲哀，失去双亲的痛楚，白发人送黑发人的打击，最后的最后，只剩下他和一头老牛相依为命。孤苦伶仃的日子里，回首曾经，追忆故人，他需要多大的勇气?我很想知道一个人要有怎样的信念和意志，才能支撑他在绝望的路上继续走下去，站在命运的对立面，不屈不挠地活着，以平淡素净的姿态过完平凡的一生。

“以笑的方式哭，在死亡的伴随下活着。”这便是福贵的一生了。一次次的死亡，早已让福贵千疮百孔的心麻木了吧?在他平静地叙说这一次次的死亡时，内心又有多么大的悲痛，我无从可知。他把所有汹涌的情感都潜进了平淡的叙述中，我不敢想象，若换作是我，我该怎样活下去，怎样笑着活下去。

经历的越多，感悟的就越深。我想，福贵一生的悲惨不是他一个人的，而属于那个不成熟、大病初愈的时代。20世纪五六十年代的中国，有着太多的躁动与不安，人人自危，为生存而担忧，福贵便是那个时代不幸的代表，而他却在那个不成熟、不理性的时代里好好活着，怀揣着思念，忍受着寂寞，经历着孤独，他在真正而真实地活，不带半点掩饰痛苦的虚假，带着份别人看不懂的释然。

“我知道黄昏在转瞬即逝，黑夜从天而降了。我看到广阔的土地袒露着结实的胸膛，那是召唤的姿态，就像女人召唤着她们的儿女，土地召唤着黑夜的来临。”《活着》就像一支古老的歌，轻轻地叙说着一朵素净的花开在绝望路上该怎么生存。

不记得是第几次翻开又合上《活着》乌黑又厚重的封皮了，抬头看天，窗外蓝天白云，阳光不噪，微风正好，泪水沾了满面，不知是为哪般?

与你相遇好幸运。——后记

The success of Milton’s Paradise Lost owes much to the depiction of the main epicimage of Satan whose attributes enable him to achieve tragic status. Although Satan may be an epic machine, he is best portrayed as the tragic anti-hero of paradise Lost. The critics in the world have been concerning the image of Satan in Paradise Lost, whose complexity makes the poem more controversial.The reason why the image under Milton’s pen is so complex is that the Satan attracts the poet’s inner force, which drives him to change the people’s traditional ideas and cause resonance of all the revolutionaries.

Satan in the Bible is an image of devil. But in Paradise Lost, Satan challenges the authority of God and want to be free, he is a fighter for freedom. The poet portrayed Satan as a brave hero that went to get rid of god’s domination. In Paradise Lost, the Satan was the most successful image the author shaped.The allure of free will is where the attractiveness and power of Satan"s character lies. Stanley Fish in his essay, ‘The Harassed Reader in Paradise Lost, argues that Satan possesses a form of heroism which is easy to admire because it is visible and flamboyant and that, on that basis, Satan’s attractiveness is only initial. Milton was, undoubtedly, conscious that he was in danger of portraying Satan as too much of a heroic figure and made efforts to be little him through the use of unflattering imagery, and by highlighting his less complimentary characteristics.

Nonetheless, our emotions are still fired. Our first encounter with Satan and his rebel hosts occurs in Book I, when they are recovering from the shock of having been expelled from heaven by the Son after three days of fighting the angels of God. Despite the defeat he has suffered, Satan gains our admiration by displaying resilience in quickly coming to terms with the change in his circumstances, in remustering his forces and organizing the building of his palace, Pandemonium. At the same time he demonstrates his determination not to be defeated and shows true qualities of leadership, persuasively arguing that there is still hope for battle and victory. Satan is convincing in his first speech to Beelzebub, his chief partner in crime, as he declares: What though the field be lost? All is not lost; the unconquerable will, And study of revenge, immortal hate, And courage never to submit or yield: And what is else not to be overcome? That glory never shall his wrath or might Extort from me. Although Satan may be an epic machine, he is best portrayed as the tragic anti-hero of Paradise Lost or, at the very least, a main character who possesses the stature and attributes which enable him to achieve tragic status. In the Greek tradition, the essential components of tragedy are admiration, fear and pity for the ‘hero’， who has to display a tragic weakness or flaw in his character, which will lead to his downfall. It might be argued that the flaws in Satan’s character are such that we should feel no admiration, fear or pity for him, yet he can be seen to inspire these emotions. Satan’s tragic flaws are pointed out in Book I. They are envy, pride, and ambition towards self-glorification. Satan’s pride, in particular, is stressed throughout Paradise Lost.

The poet condemned God through Satan’s words. On the surface, God had given human free will; in fact, he had suppressed the true freedom.Obviously, the poet"s criticism and condemnation of God were out from the social reality of United Kingdom. The tyrant was the embodiment of Stuart. Milton laid his own political tendencies in the great Satan. He portrayed Satan"s resistance as the justice resistance to authoritarian rule and a bold challenge to the violent regime.

她和他，是在单位相遇的。

很偶然的一次，她向他问路，眼神一碰，内心便生出情谊来。她和他的故事，就此一点点展开了。

又一次，他感到胃十分不适，她双眸含笑，轻声问“你喝糖水吗?”他望向她，心中腾起一片温暖，慢慢地扩散到全身。他双手接过糖水，笑着点头。这件小事，使他对她的感情升温。他心想：“多细心的姑娘”

这些日子里，他没日没夜地想她。看到花儿，就仿佛见到了她那娇美的脸庞，望见阳光，就仿佛看到她明媚的笑脸。不，她的笑比阳光更迷人。眸中带笑，笑似月光星辰。

第一次和她一起吃饭，大概是在相识一个月后。他装着一箩筐欢喜去见她，请她一起去吃饭。当时穷，吃不了太好的，可每一片菜叶中都包含着浓浓的爱意。沉默不语时，彼此的心也连着。菜本不是很香，可心里香甜，菜比往常都香。

他们两个在一起了。她时常小鸟依人般的向他撒娇。他们在一起计划自己的将来，有个房子，还有一个聪明可爱的娃。他们在一起，下雨阴天也是晴天，任何烦恼都可以抛开。

他提到“我们结婚吧。”她便欣然接受了。几年后，便想要一个孩子。在医院里，他等待着，在门前来回踱步。一边祈祷着母子平安，一边期待设想着孩子的模样。圆圆的脸，红嘟嘟的嘴唇，亮晶晶的眼睛，定会很可爱吧。

我便诞生了。在家里，父亲母亲日夜不停的照顾我，我也慢慢的长大。家里过着柴米油盐的日子，平平淡淡的幸福着。

世间的缘分都是那样美好，去珍惜你身边的每个人，感谢你们的相遇。

在天愿做比翼鸟，在地愿为连理枝。愿我的父母能相伴一生，厮守永远。

“一本书像一艘船，带领咱们从狭窄的当地驶向日子无限宽广的海洋。”“读一本好书，便是和许多崇高的人说话。”看，赞书的语句不计其数！是啊，书像一只小鸟，带咱们飞进常识的天空；书又像一艘大船，领咱们入常识的海洋。我看过许多书，可是给我留下最深形象的，仍是归《简爱》莫属。

简爱是一个小女子的姓名。她的日子与咱们这些孩子的日子几乎便是大相径庭。由于爸爸妈妈双亡，她只好住在舅舅家。可是不过多久，爱她的舅舅逝世了，她成了一个剩余的人。暴虐的舅妈不光让她不停地做家务，还让简爱去伺候她的那个被宠坏的表哥，因而，她常常遭到优待。后来，她的舅妈乃至是把她送到了女子学院，扔掉了简爱这个“包袱”。可是简爱很刚强，她靠自己的才调找到了一份很好的作业。她教得非常超卓，得到了别人的欣赏，可是，令人意想不到的工作发生了。

“我快要疯了！怎样会这样，怎样会这样？”这是简爱在文中所说的一句话。你听了后或许会不明白，简爱她究竟怎样了？让我来告知你吧，简爱的爱人在与她进行婚礼的时分，被别人揭露他本来有一个疯妻子！读到这儿，我的心中泛起了一股怜惜心，简爱是多么不幸！简爱，我怜惜你！我刻不容缓地往下看：“可是，简爱她却忍耐住了，她来到别的一个城市，与命运之神持续搏斗着……”

她的叔叔逝世了，她承继了叔叔的一大笔产业！啊，这便是否极泰来了！她回到了她的爱人身边，照料他，与他夸姣地日子着。

读完这本书后，我被简爱的那种刚强的.精力所感动！是啊，简爱不便是像竹子相同，“千磨万击还坚劲，任尔东西南北风”吗？她那种百折不挠的精力与我形成了明显的比照，要是我的话，一遇到什么困难、波折就哭鼻子。看来，我确实要学习简爱那种百折不挠，刚强的质量啊！

朋友们，捧起《简爱》来细细品味吧！它就如一杯香浓的咖啡，令人喝了后久久回味；又像一位杰出的教师，教训你刚强做人的道理，让人收获颇丰！《简爱》是咱们的益友，咱们的良师！

高尔基是前苏联无产阶级伟大的作家，他亲身经历资本主义残酷的剥削与压迫，写出了无数感动人心的作品。寒假里，我读了他的自传体三部曲《童年》、《在人间》、《我的大学》，其中《童年》给我留下了深刻的记忆。

《童年》为我们讲述了一位孤独少年阿廖沙的成长故事。阿廖沙的童年是多么的难过啊，真的可以用“窒息的天地，苦难的童年”来形容。

他三岁丧父，跟随悲痛欲绝的母亲和慈祥的外祖母寄宿在外祖父家，凶狠的外祖父经常毒打阿廖沙，有一次还差点把他打死!，他10岁左右又失去了母亲，由于无法忍受在外祖父家的生活，阿廖沙读完三年级，就永远离开了他心爱的学校课堂，开始了自食其力的生活，他当过学徒、搬运工、面包师······他的童年真的是饱受了生活的所有艰辛和痛苦。饱览了生活的艰辛的他酷爱学习，在艰苦劳动之余仍坚持写作和阅读，最终成长为一个坚强勇敢、充满爱心的人。

读了这本书，我不禁陷入了沉思：高尔基的童年真的很悲惨，和他比起来，我们真的是太幸福了!不仅没有痛苦与斗争，整天在父母的庇护下无忧无虑地生活着。甚至过着“衣来伸手，饭来张口”的生活，却还在整日地埋怨老师管的太严，妈妈太唠叨……真是和阿廖沙有着天壤之别!

我不禁想到了自己我已经12岁了，连自己的内衣都是妈妈给洗，妈妈说：“你什么都不用管，只要好好学习就行!”可是我却整天在妈妈不注意的时候跟同学闲聊、上网打游戏……现在想想，哎，真是身在福中不知福啊!如果让我处在阿廖沙那样的境地，真的不知道自己能不能有勇气有能力活下去。

读完这本书，我对今后的生活有了新的认识。我明白了阿廖沙的童年虽然是灰暗的.，充满苦难的，但是他总是用笑来面对困难，不放弃!我明白了我们应该珍惜珍惜童年的美好时光，好好学习，好好充实自己，让自己的童年不再留有遗憾!

阿米尔这个富家少爷所犯下的罪行，不也是一样。在面对自己人性中的怯懦、说谎、虚伪、善嫉、矫情、邪恶、自私、自大时，他选择的是逃避，这是一个懦弱无知少年的错误选择。他也为此付出了一生，来自心灵鞭挞、愧疚、恐惧的沉痛代价。

少年之间的友谊就本是微妙的，因身份地位不同而相互之间小心翼翼的试探。可能，这就像一个巨大的命运轮盘。因为社会地位的差距，阿米对于哈桑有种先天上的优势，因此两人永远不可能成为真正意义上的朋友。阿米便能将性格中的“恶”暴露在哈桑的面前。通过有意无意的欺负，阿米在哈桑身上抒发生活中来自父亲的甚至是来自哈桑的压力。但哈桑又带给了他这么多的快乐和认同，似乎一切都是因为自己不够好。最后，为了得到父亲的认同，他甚至眼看哈桑被人强暴，而仅仅是为了保住他的蓝风筝。他对哈桑感到愧疚，想让哈桑打还他，想让他们就此扯平，可哈桑还是什么都不做，甚至把烂果子抹在自己的脸上，哈桑还是如此深的在包容他，信任他，爱他。他平静的外表下掩藏着一股找不到出口的洪水，愧疚和怕人发现的寝食不安在折磨着他。但他依旧将他的恶发泄到哈桑身上，只因为他是仆人，他是弱势的。尔后，哈桑被他逼走了，他似乎找到了平静。

那一幕发生在追风筝大赛后的一场意外的背叛，是因为胆怯的自私性格，导致一段真切友谊的逝去。在阿米尔成年后，辗转回到饱经战火摧残的阿富汗之后，发现在种族和宗教的自我本位主义下，在政权更迭的动荡下，践踏生命都变得那般的毫不起眼。

在多年以后，有人告诉他，哈桑是他同父异母的兄弟。是父亲和仆人的妻子通奸生下的不能承认的儿子。这本来还有理可循的事就变得如此荒诞不经。 父亲的隐瞒和有意无意的比较，哈桑和阿米之间不平等的地位，阿米的自卑自怜自伤自傲，哈桑所受的屈辱痛苦，在那个身份地位等级的社会里，还有多多少少这样的故事?可能这就是在社会背景下那个叫做命运的东西。 因为阶级和一段不可告人的秘密成为主仆，因为种族的对立和迫害酝酿了最终的悲剧…… 那个与他如影随形的哈桑，那个愿意为他付出一切代价的哈桑，那个在他耳边说着“为你，千千万万遍”的哈桑，此生却无缘再见。

今天，我把《老人与海》这一本书读完了，这一本书主要讲了一位老人在海上钓鱼，可他一连84没有钓上一条鱼。

其实这本书我读完后，并没有完全理解这本书的意思，于是我就问了妈妈，妈妈就又给我讲了一遍，我才明白了一些。

老人一连84天没有任何收获，可是他没有放弃，仍然不停的给自己加油鼓劲，最后他决定去深海里捕捉一条大大的鱼，于是他就出发了。最后虽然他钓到了一条好大的鱼，但在在往回返的时候却被大鲨鱼给吃光了，只留下了一条巨大的鱼骨头。他很伤心。

看完这本书，我心里有点难过。我觉得老人很可怜。

《明朝那些事》，近两年来一部非常走红的网络小说，作者以明朝历史为背景，用诙谐幽默的语言娓娓叙述。读这套书，就像在听一个人讲故事，故事很精彩，让人感觉就像书中所说那样——原来历史如此精彩。

这本书讲了两百多年的明朝历史，以明朝皇帝为主线，辅以各朝代的名人，讲了宫廷斗争、朝政纷争等这些历史学家向来重视的东西。读这套书，相信很多人并不是本着用它来研究明朝历史的用意，而是觉得它是本好小说，让人读着欲罢不能的小说，看到动情处可以为之感叹流量，看到幽默处能捧腹大笑。

书中基本以人物为主，一套书下来，描述了大明王朝众多的出名人物，由于作者本着名人要突出名人中的名人，坏人要突出坏人中的极品坏人，因此大多数人物都是我们耳熟能详的。既是人物为主，给我感触良多的也是那些名人，书中叙述的这些名人中，最令我敬佩的有三个人:于谦、王守仁、海瑞。

于谦，土木堡之变后撑起明朝一片天空的领袖。他给我最大的感触便是正直，浩气冲天。从他身上，可以看到中国儒家文化中的精华，救民救国与危难之中，敢于承担责任，以民族国家利益为首。就像范仲淹所说的:先天下之忧而忧，后天下之乐而乐。我喜欢称这样的人为英雄，因为他们所做的，他们身上所散发的光辉，值得令人敬仰。

曾经看到过一篇评论，说于谦是民族英雄，于土木堡之变中挽救明王朝，但此后身上的封建忠君思想过于落后，此评连带岳飞、文天祥，一起批判了“封建忠君思想”。中国文字向来是欲扬先抑或欲抑先扬，后一句往往分量更重。这篇评论，更多的是批判。但我觉得这番评论实在是欠妥，颇有迎合当权者的意味。这样的民族英雄，处在他们的时代，做出这些大事的时候恐怕想的更多的是华夏民族所建立的国家。也只有他们，才能被称之为英雄，只有他们，才不辱没千百年来读过书的华夏儿女的精神。

第一次知道于谦是小时候读到他的诗《石灰吟》:“千锤百击出深山，烈火焚烧若等闲，粉身碎骨全不怕，要留清白在人间。”