《老人与海》英文读后感（汇总20篇）

One of the most interesting questions about Gullivers Travels is whether the Houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of Swifts satire. In other words, in Book IV, is Swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? If we look closely at the way that the Houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact Swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

First we have to see that Swift does not even take Gullver seriously. For instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. Also, when he first sees the Yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. He says, "I must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. This is why Swift refers to Erasmus Darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the Beagle-to show how Gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. But if Lemule Gulliver is satirized, so are the Houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. They walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. As Gulliver says, "It was with the utmost astonishment that I witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a Vienese waltz. To my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the Lord Edmund Burke" . As this quote demonstrates, Gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the Houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. For instance, the leader of the Houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of Charles Dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the Kings and Queens of England up to George II. Swift subtly shows that this Houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of Queen Elizabeths husband.

Swifts satire of the Houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. One of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that Guenivre has brought with him to the island. First she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. But when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "As I watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than Mr. Pope being fitted by a clothier. She dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. My horse sniffed the creature and turned away." It might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. But it makes more sense if we see that Swift is being satiric here: it is the female Houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century England. The Houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress Gullivers horse. Gulliver imagines the horse saying, Sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held Mr. Pope on her back makes me queezy .

A final indication that the Houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the Houynhms visits Lilliput, where he visits the French Royal Society. He goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at Gallilee). The scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the Houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "The creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. Slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

你对动物的态度是怎样的呢?是真情对待?还是态度恶劣呢?你又是如何看待和动物之间的关系呢?是当做亲人?还是当做玩具?

今日，我学了一篇文章——《老人与海鸥》。故事是这样的：每逢冬季来临，海鸥便成群结队地来到翠湖之畔，老人也像赶赴约会似的，每一天到翠湖之畔去喂海鸥，风雨无阻。他视海鸥为儿女，给它们起名字，喂饼干，照顾伤病的海鸥。久而久之，海鸥与老人结下了深厚的情谊。然而有一天，老人去世了。海鸥们在老人的遗像前翻飞盘旋，连声鸣叫，后又肃立不动，像是为老人守灵的白翼”天使“，不忍离开自我的亲人。

读了这篇文章后，我不禁留下了感动的泪水。老人为了海鸥，竟然每一天步行二十余里去看海鸥;老人为了海鸥，竟然连自我的衣服破了、旧了也不换，而是为海鸥买食物，老人为了海鸥做出了许多让我们意想不到的事情。海鸥对老人的情谊也是如此的深厚，海鸥竟然为老人吊唁，用自我独特的方式表达着对老人的留恋。善良的老人，纯洁的海鸥，用真情向我们展示了那无私的爱和震撼的情。着怎能不让人为之动容呢?

我原先养过一只小狗，它叫欢欢。从妈妈把它带回家的第一天，我就认定了它是我们家的一份子，是我最好的朋友。我每一天和欢欢一齐奔跑、玩耍，欢乐极了!每一天晚上睡觉前，我都要对它说，晚安!在这一个月里我欢乐极了，可是，有一天妈妈却说要把欢欢送走。我留下了不舍的眼泪，欢欢好像也明白它要离开我似的，在这一天里，它时时刻刻都和我在一齐，临走的时候，欢欢也悲痛地哭了。

世间万物都是有灵性的，遍及天地的爱心是我们这个世界的期望。动物是我们亲密无间的朋友，它们和我们一齐组成了丰富、美丽、和谐的世界，让我们和动物和谐相处吧!

《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯第一部社会小说，小说中“奥利弗要求添粥”一节已被编入多种英语教科书中。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

Here I am sitting on a couch alone thinking about what I have just finished reading with tears of sadness filling my eyes and fire of indignation filling my heart which revived my exhausted soul that has already been covered by the cruelty and the selfishness of the secular world for a long time. It is truly what I felt after reading Oliver Twist written by the prominent British author Charles Dickens.

The resonance between me and the book makes me feel not only the kindness and the wickedness of all the characters in the novel but what this aloof society lacks and what I lack deep inside. These supreme resources I’m talking about right now are somewhat different from minerals oil that we usually mention. They’re abstract like feelings and some kinds of spiritual stimulation that all of us desire anxiously from one another —— love and care.

Those charitable figures whom Dickens created in the novel are really what we need in life. They showed love and care to others just as the gentle rain from the sky fell upon the earth which was carved into my heart deeply.

Mr. Brownlow is one such person.

The other day he had one of his elaborate watches stolen by two skilled teenage thieves Artful Dodger and Charley Bates and thought naturally it was Oliver who was an orphan and forced to live with a gang of thieves that had done it because he was the only one near by after the theft had taken place. Being wrathful he caught Oliver and sent him to the police station where the ill-tempered unfair magistrates worked. Fortunately for him Oliver was proved innocent by one onlooker afterwards. With sympathy Mr. Brownlow took the injured poor Oliver to his own home. There Oliver lived freely and gleefully for some months as if he were Mr. Brownlow’s own son. One day however Mr. Brownlow asked Oliver to return some books to the bookseller and to send some money for the new books that he had already collected. The thief Oliver once stayed with kidnapped him. After that he disappeared in Mr. Brownlow’s life. Searching for a while Mr. Brownlow had to believe the fact that he had run away with his money. But dramatically they came across each other again a few years later. Without hesitation Mr. Brownlow took Oliver home for the second time not caring if he had done something evil.

Perhaps most of us would feel confused about Mr. Brownlow’s reaction. But as a matter of fact this is just the lesson we should learn from him. Jesus said in the Bible. “Forgive not seven times but seventy-times seven.” Why is that? Because forgiveness is our ability to remove negative thoughts and neutralize them so our energy may be spent on doing what we came here for. We cannot move forward in our future if past issues cloud our thinking. Stop put Mr. Brownlow into the list of your models. Always give people a second chance no matter what they might have done. That’s also a substantial part of loving and caring others.

Then there are Mrs. Maylie and Rose Oliver’s other benefactors. Maybe the reason they loved and cared Oliver was not because of forgiveness. In my point of view it was trust. They had faith in Oliver when he was considered to be a filthy burglar who tried to break the front door of Maylie’s at midnight. But this wasn’t how these two ladies saw the whole thing. They denied Oliver’s crime immediately and listened attentively to Oliver’s own description of his miserable life. They were deeply touched by Oliver’s strong perseverance and astonishing vitality. Accordingly they remedied Oliver’s body and heart and turned him into a different boy. He began to wear appropriate and clean suits which were tailor-made for him and receive education.

As far as we can see it is trust that helps us all live together without precaution. Sometimes trust can even lead us to miracles which we often expect to come about so why not trust? Trust yourself trust others and you’ll salute miracles every single day.

In the novel though the young Oliver again and again fell for conspiracies of those hideous thieves who tried to torture Oliver’s body and poisoned Oliver’s heart intensely he always lived on and tried hard to seek for his own life. Then I realized what supported him all through were actually beliefs. In most cases what you believe is what you’ll become. Believe that you are unlimited that you can do anything you commit to doing and when you do your accomplishments will know no bounds. You control your beliefs and that is how you ultimately control your life. It’s all dictated by your attitude.

In the final analysis love and care contain numerous forms there are love of forgiveness love of trust etc. but they all come from your beliefs in life. When someone tells you he’s deceived you forgive him anyway when someone tells you what he’s done trust him anyway and when you face adversities while chasing your dreams think about your beliefs then what hinders you will become a piece of cake in no time.

So find out “Olivers” in your life and do as Mr. Brownlow and Mrs. Maylie do: love them and care them which cost nothing but save much. They enrich those who receive without impoverishing those who give. They can be certain smallest words or actions but the memory of them sometimes last forever.

Charles Dickens said:“Love makes the world go around.” These immortal words have inspired and will keep on inspiring us to chant the melody of love and to say the prayer of care forevermore. Let us therefore enjoy life and treat other people lovingly. These principles are the roots and foundations of beliefs supporting this article and our mission together.

To Regain the Nature of Goodness

—— Review of ‘Oliver Twist

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those vermin-to-be to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

这个寒假，我读了一本书叫《老人与海》这本书主要讲述了一位老人常年独安闲海上打鱼。有一次他掉到了一条大鱼，但是在返回的路上碰到了成群的鲨鱼。老人使出浑身解数和鲨鱼搏斗，鲨鱼把能吃的肉都吃完了，结果老人拖回去的只是一副大鱼骨架。

在生活中，我们碰到了困难，也许会迎难而上；但也会畏难止步。比如说张海迪阿姨，她小时候双脚就已经残废，但是她并没有向挫折屈服，而是以积极、乐观、自信的态度去挑战挫折。她天天把词语贴在床头、墙壁上、厨房……经过张海迪阿姨的不懈努力，她终于战胜了挫折，而且还获得了荣誉，为祖国做出了自己的贡献。鲁迅先生曾经说过：“伟大的胸怀，应该表现出这样的气概—用笑脸迎接悲惨的命运，用自信的勇气来应付自己的不幸。”是啊！当我们碰到厄运和不幸时，与其埋怨命运的不公，还不如鼓起勇气，振作精神，以刚毅的态度与厄运抗争。老人不也是这样的吗？老人没有被任何困难压倒，他尽自己最大的努力与生活中的磨难做不屈不挠的斗争。老人也说过医生令我最难忘的话：“一个人并不是生来就要给打败的，你可以消灭他，却不能打败他。”当你碰到困难时，你一定不要被挫折压倒啊！一个人的一生中不可能没有失败，但我们假如能够从失败中获取有益的经验，发现成功的曙光，把失败看成是同乡成功的必经之路。那才是从失败中获取的最大的收获。毛泽东主席曾经说过：“失败是成功之母。”曾任美国总统的林肯一生遭碰到无数次失败和打击。然而，他英勇卓绝。他从1832年失业后，他经过了13次竞选，然而有12次的竞选是失败的。他在最后一次，也就是1860年的时候林肯终于当选为美国总统，他终于成功了，这是一件多么令人兴奋的事情，他的努力终于得到了回报。

我们碰到挫折时，应该要勇敢面对，在困难面前迎难而上。我们有了这种奋不顾身、不怕困难的勇气，就有了征服困难的精神力量。正如歌德所说的：“你若失去了金钱—你只失去了一点儿；你若失去了荣誉—你就失掉了许多；你若失去了勇气—你就把一切都失去了。”

现在我们努力起来，他们永不言弃的精神感动并激励着我们每个人吧！

[寒假作文《老人与海》读后感

《老人与海》是一部历时一个世纪的巨作，它告诉了我们人生哲学中的诸多道理，同时就我看来，其中也不乏蕴涵着一些程序方面的重大道理。

海明威的《老人与海》讲述了一个极为简单的故事，这是一篇让看过它的人都感动其中、感悟其中的故事：一个名叫桑提亚哥的老渔夫，独自一个人出海打鱼。在一无所获的84天后钓到了一条奇大无比的马林鱼。这是老人从来没见过也没听说过的比他的船还大两英尺的一条大鱼。鱼大劲也大，拖着小船漂流了整整两天两夜。老人在这两天两夜中经历了从未经受的艰难考验，终于把大鱼刺死，拴在船头。然而这时却遇上了鲨鱼，老人与鲨鱼进行了殊死搏斗，结果大马林鱼还是被鲨鱼吃光了，老人最后拖回家的只剩下一副光秃秃的鱼骨架。

也许，书中的老渔夫不是最后的胜利者，因为尽管开始他战胜了大马林鱼，但最终还是让鲨鱼吃了，他只带着鱼骨上岸，可是他始终没有向大海、向大马林鱼、向鲨鱼妥协，他其实是一个敢于挑战自身缺陷及自己勇气和信心的胜利者。

在茫茫黑夜的巨浪中，弱小的人类与强大的自然在奋勇抗争，如同面对命运莫测的人生，可以消灭的是肉体，不可以征服的是意志和精神。清晨归来，老人并非一无所有，战胜自然，战胜自我而获得的生命自由就是他胜利的象征。

无可否认，只要是人就都会有缺陷。当一个人承认了这个缺陷并努力去战胜它而不是去屈从它的时候，无论他能否最终战胜自身的这个缺陷，他都是一个胜利者，因为他已经战胜了自己对缺陷的妥协，他是自己勇气和信心的胜利者。老渔夫就是敢于挑战自身缺陷及自己勇气和信心的胜利者。从世俗胜利观的角度看，老渔夫不是最后的胜利者，因为尽管开始他战胜了大马林鱼，但是最终大马林鱼还是让鲨鱼吃了，他只是带着大马林鱼的白骨架子回到了岸上，也就是说，鲨鱼才是胜利者。可是，在理想主义者眼里，老渔夫就是胜利者，因为他始终没有向大海没有向大马林鱼，更没有向鲨鱼妥协和投降。

人性是强悍的，人类本身有自己的限度，但正是因为有了老渔夫这样的人一次又一次地向限度挑战，超越它们，这个限度才一次次扩大，一次次把更大的挑战摆在了人类面前。在这个意义上，老渔夫桑地亚哥这样的英雄，不管他们挑战限度是成功还是失败，都是值得我们永远敬重的。"一艘船越过世界的尽头，驶向未知的大海，船头上悬挂着一面虽然饱经风雨剥蚀却依旧艳丽无比的旗帜，旗帜上，舞动着云龙一般的四个字闪闪发光--超越极限!"作者海明威是这样评价他的作品《老人与海》的。

当我们读到在大海中苦苦鏖战的老人和拼死也要活口的鱼类的时候，我们愿意相信这就是活着之所以应该活着的价值，证明自身存在的价值，对于年轻人以及中年人来说更应该多从这个角度来理会本书的内涵，奋斗可能没有结果，可能一切都会是一场空空的"骨架"，但是，有一点我们必须承认，奋斗的过程是何其令人赞赏?正像某书评作家解读《西游记》中的孙悟空一样，读者最喜欢的还是西行中的孙行者，而不是已经修成正果的斗战胜佛

人生就如一片汪 洋，很宽，也很危险。它可以把你推向一个高度，也会瞬间让你失去自己所有的幸福。我们为了保留这一丝幸福，会努力地向浪尖奔去，用我们的满腔热血化解有时愤怒的海洋。要知道，一个好渔人，是拥有桑提亚哥的意志和精神的。

我想：人生即是海洋，时而波涛汹涌，时而风平浪静。在风里你可以感受坚毅，在浪里你可以感受激昂!这些都是过程带给我们的快乐和痛苦!

Beowulf is the oldest poem in the English language and the most important specimen of Anglo-Saxon literature.The main stories are based on the folk legends of the primitive northern tribes.

Beowulf is the nephew of king of the Geats who lives in Denmark. He defeated the monster, which raided the hall built by the king of the Danes. Later on, Beowulf becomes king of the Geats. He at last dies a heroic death.

It is a pagan poem, which presents us an all-round picture of the tribal society.

《贝奥武甫》是中世纪欧洲第一篇民族史诗，英国文学的开山之作。其主要内容是讲述高特王子贝奥武甫带领十二勇士来到丹麦王国，除去恶魔葛婪代及其母亲，为丹麦解除祸患赢得和平，得到荣誉和重赏后回到故土;后来贝奥武甫做了高特国王，没想到在五十年后，一条火龙扰乱了王国的安宁，贝奥武甫虽然已经英雄暮年，但仍壮志不已，独战火龙，终于壮烈牺牲。

贝奥武甫的人格结构具有丰富的人性化内涵。他的童年经历对其心理结构的形成影响深刻，在他的身上，超我与本我不断碰撞与冲突。贝奥武甫以自己的死亡成就了英雄的完美，直到生命的最后，他终于找到了作为英雄的人格结构的和谐。

《老人与海》不是一篇教导人们如何实现灵魂和谐的小说，而是一种探索和追寻。老人希望用海上的渔猎经历寄托自身价值的超越。“一个人可以被毁灭，但不能给打败”——无疑这正是海明威的价值观——被捕杀的大马林鱼的生命是老人的牺牲品，大鱼和老人又一起成为鲨鱼的牺牲品，而鲨鱼最终会成为大自然的牺牲品。这是海明威式的固执的悲观主义情结的反映。如果生命意味着一场牺牲，人类只能无能为力。

这本书塑造了一个经典的硬汉形象。古巴的一个名叫圣地亚哥的老渔夫，独自一个人出海打鱼，在一无所获的84天之后钓到了一条无比巨大的马林鱼。然而这时却遇上了鲨鱼，老人与鲨鱼进行了殊死搏斗，结果大马林鱼还是被鲨鱼吃光了，老人最后拖回家的只剩下一副光秃秃的鱼骨架。老人虽然失败了，但他在与鱼斗争的过程中表现出了超常的毅力和勇气，表现了一种不可被征服的精神上的胜利，他可以说是一个顶天立地的大丈夫。书中通过对老人与鲨鱼斗智斗勇的场面，描写细腻，引人入胜。作者从多个角度描绘了鲨鱼的凶狠狡猾。老人拼尽全力为了保住自己好不容易捕到的一条大马林鱼。充分体现出老人无畏精神。

我轻轻翻开以前的课本，看到了《老人与海鸥》这一课，我认真地读了一遍，深切地感受到了动物也是有情感的。

这篇课文主要讲了一位贫穷老人不论刮风下雨都去喂海鸥，从此他们之间产生了浓厚的感情。老人死后，海鸥们在老人的遗像前翻飞、盘旋、肃立、鸣叫，当拿走遗像时又依依不舍。我感叹了：小小的动物竟如此有情有义！

其实不单单是海鸥，世界上每一个动物都有情感。还记得那是星期六的一个下午，我和一群小伙伴正在玩捉迷藏。我躲在了一个大屋子后面，忽然发现了在石缝中有几个鸟蛋，于是满心欢喜地拿了出来，但一不小心捏碎了。当黑夜织上了天空，有一只鸟的黑影在天空中飞来飞去，并不停地鸣叫着，那叫声中含着凄凉、焦急和悲伤，我想那就是鸟妈妈吧。我听着鸟叫声，心里不由的愧疚起来。第二天清晨，鸟妈妈死了。它的眼睛凝望着天空，嘴巴张的很大。我震撼了：是什么让它坚持到生命的最后一刻？是什么让它充满了力气？是情感，世界万物都具备的情感！同样，《老人与海鸥》中的海鸥也是这样，谁能说海鸥不是具备情感才和老人建立深厚的情感桥梁呢？

通过《老人与海鸥》这篇课文，我知道了：动物也是有感情的。

导语：《高老头》这部作品在展示社会生活的广度和深度方面，在反映作家世界观的进步性和局限性方面，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

The sun setting, I pull the curtain aside and open the window, taking a deep breath, and feeling the vicissitudes of life.

Be faced with he money, great father is worth of nothing.

At that time, money is the capitalist new signs of the times, and father is just something that when the patriarchal clan system residual feelings.

Concerning father’s love corroded by money, whats left? Sighing…

Saddened by her solitude in the falling dusk, she is assailed by wind and rain. I never thought that, they decided to choose money instead of love. Extreme egoism flooded all moral principles. Father Goriots property was bled white and abandoned. Originally the spoiling under the money is so heartbreaking.

He was glowing with pain and memory, always hiding in the lonely grave.

Obedient just quietly indulgence, in exchange for you is just being betrayed.

Father Goriot still adhere to love them, as in the past, there is no reason, nor whether it is worthwhile, maybe, in his heart, so this is love.

The story happened in the past, but affects the future.

In our society, who are the only children in us, and it is groeing up in the doting parents’ love ? The same is the interpretation of love, at different times, what is the difference? As children, to accept the same care, what difference does it make? The same parents, giving this selfless care, and usually in the Father Goriot "refuse to realize ones error"?

It is often said, “This is the product of the society”。 Yes, the society originated from the people, for people in the final analysis, it is still the problem! Human nature on the one hand is missing, that led to all the problems of society the arch-criminal.

Their son is of far-reaching.

Ive seen in a magazine that a story:

Kim was born in a rich family. A few years ago parents opened the gold mine and accumulated vast wealth, becoming the richest man in the village. Rich family make little Kim be spoiled, and develop a wayward character that she love leisure and hate labour. She learned to smoke, drink alcohol, and spend a lot of money. In the countryside, her monthly expense is two thousand yuan, let the other kids out of,. When she was lack of money, she would ask parents for money, sometime little criterion thousands, but sometime over ten thousand. Once, she told a lie to his father for money to buy things, opening, f

​

这本书写了一个名叫桑提阿果的老人，他常年在海上打鱼，有一次连续八十四天，他连一条小鱼都没钓着，但是他一直很乐观。

有一次出海，他钓了一条很大的鱼，但是鱼血的腥味招来了鲨鱼，鲨鱼疯狂的啃吃大鱼的肉，老人便使出全身力气与鲨鱼搏斗，在漆黑的夜里，海风吹的他浑身疼痛，他很疲劳，但他依然拿着木棒去打击那些袭击大鱼的鲨鱼们，终于把鲨鱼打败了，可大鱼身上的肉全被鲨鱼吃光了，老人只拖回去一副大鱼骨架。这就是老人与海的故事，老人遇到困难时不放弃，历尽艰难终于把鲨鱼打败了。他说过：“一个人不是生来就是要给打败的，你可以消灭他，却不能打败他。”

看完后，我心里久久不能平静，老人这个平常的打鱼人都知道尽自己最大的努力与生活中的磨难作斗争，而我们呢，经常被种.种不起眼的小事压倒、放弃，甚至逃避，我们为什么不向老人那样呢?

大家应该学习老人这种永不放弃的精神品质。

在诸多习爷爷读过的书里，有一本书令我记忆犹新，深深地打动了我，这本书就是海明威的《老人与海》。老人身上独有的优秀品质激励着我，鼓舞着我，让我争当新时代的好队员。

老人是坚毅的。他独自出海捕鱼，足足84天在海上辛勤地漂泊着，却没有捕到一条鱼，但他并没有轻言放弃，终于功夫不负有心人，他第二次出海时捕到了一条十八英尺大的又肥又厚的马林鱼。因为老人坚信，“人不是为失败而生的，一个人可以被毁灭，但不可以被打败。”每当我遇到数学难题的时候，我也常常想放弃，可是一想到《老人与海》中的老人，就立刻打起了精神，积极开动脑筋思考，常常豁然开朗。

老人是勇敢的。他想方设法地阻止鲨鱼吞噬马林鱼肉。他在船桨上绑了一根铁质的尖刀，再用打金枪鱼的棍子撑住鲨鱼的嘴巴，还用船柄狠狠地砸鲨鱼。就这样，他在茫茫大海中，凭借一己之力奋斗了三天三夜，虽然老人的船桨断了，手抽筋了，尖刀也沉入了海底，但是终于取得了优异的战绩，赶跑了鲨鱼群，并平安无事地拖着马林鱼骨架回到了港湾，令人刮目相看。每次在学习和生活中面临挑战的时候，我也应该学习老人不畏艰难的品质，勇敢地去尝试，积极地去应对，努力争取一个又一个成功。

老人是乐观的。海上形势凶险，有一次他在捕金枪鱼的时候，眼看着就要成功了，可惜突然左手抽了筋。他没有责怪自己在关键时候掉链子，而是风趣幽默地甩了甩手说：“手，你怎么在该工作的时候休息了呢？”正是这种自信而乐观的品质，鼓舞着老人勇往直前，在茫茫大海中搏斗着。每当我感到自责的时候，我也应该向老人学习，凡是往积极的一面去想，或许就可以克服困难。

读完这本有意义的书，我被老人的魅力所深深折服。细细品味这位不向命运低头的老人，他的精神是多么值得称赞啊！相信只要你用心去读，就会深深爱上这本书，并且受益匪浅。

你知道百折不挠的意思么？百姓和不挠的意思就是无论受到多少次挫折，毫不动摇退缩。而老人圣地亚哥就是这样的人。

老人圣地亚哥的岁数已经很大了，可他的眼睛里，依然闪烁着永不服输的光芒。虽然他知道，他可能很快就要破产了，可他还有勇气去捕鱼。老人已经八十四天没有捕到鱼了，而他没有放弃，也并没有屈服于命运，而是在努力更改它的命运。在第八十五天，没有水，没有食物，没有武器，没有助手，左手抽筋的情况下，他仍然把鱼钩上来了。正是老人身上的那种不屈不挠的品质让他不会轻言放弃，让他对自己有信心，对幸福有渴望，让他遇到困难，不退缩，而是迎难而上。

具有这样百折不挠品质的人，还有我非常欣赏的美国著名女作家海伦·凯勒。她在很小的时候因为生病引起高烧，导致失明和聋哑，可她仍然没有放弃自己，而是用比一般人多倍的努力来训练自己。最后在老师的帮助下和自己的努力下，考入了哈佛大学，当上了著名的女作家。前几天我去看了一台全国残障儿童全国比赛暨颁奖晚会，让我印象最深的节目是由聋哑儿童表演的舞蹈“千手观音”。这个节目需要音乐和演员之间的默契配合，对于我们都很难完成，更何况是聋哑人？她们肯定失败过很多次，只有百折不挠、坚持不懈，才能成就最后的成功。这些，和老人圣地亚哥不是很像吗？

在生活中，我们作为学生也会面对很多困难，其实这些困难比起圣地亚哥、海伦凯勒和那些残障儿童，还是要容易一些。所以，我们更应该珍惜我们的生活，积极面对困难和挑战，不要消沉。长风破浪会有时，直挂云帆济沧海，相信我们总会成功的。

Book Review: “Camille”

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800s, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armands father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armands reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumass last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?

This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following

Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?

The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane

met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In

dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

永不言败，这就是《老人与海》告诉我们的。

今年暑假，我读了美国著名作家海明威的小说《老人与海》。我十分佩服小说中老渔夫的意志，他让我懂得了一个人一定要有坚持不懈的精神，才能获得成功。

小说描写的是一个年近六旬的老渔夫，在一次单身出海打鱼时，钓到了一条大鱼，却拉不上来。老渔夫同鱼周旋了几天后，才发现这是一条超过自己渔船数倍的大马林鱼，虽然明知很难取胜，但仍不放弃。后来又因大马林鱼伤口上的鱼腥味引来了几群鲨鱼抢食，但老人仍不愿就这样放弃，最终突出重围，将大鱼带回了渔港，让其他渔夫佩服不已。

当我读到“老渔夫想：这里离海岸实在是太近了，也许在更远的地方会有更大的鱼……”时，我十分佩服这位老渔夫，因为他这时已经打到了一些鱼，但他没有安于现状，而是向着更大的目标前进。再看看我们，平时遇到一点小困难，我们都叫苦连天。我们是祖国的未来，应该像这位老人一样胸怀大志，去追求更好、更大的目标。

当我读到“大马林鱼开始快速地围着小渔船游动，将缆绳缠绕到了桅杆上，老人右手高举着钢叉，在它跃出水面的一瞬间，竭尽全力地向它的心脏掷去，一声哀鸣结束了大鱼的生命，它静静地浮在水面上……”时，我的心也像一块大石头落了地。我非常钦佩老人那种毫不畏惧、坚持不懈的精神，虽然知道对手实力很强，但他没有丝毫退缩，而是迎难而上。正因为有了这种精神，老渔夫才获得了这场生死较量的胜利。我们在生活中也要学习老渔夫的精神，做事情不怕困难，才能取得成功。

在读到大鱼的血腥味被一群鲨鱼嗅到了，争相游来抢食，老人的左手正好在抽筋，他只能使用右手，用木棒、捕到的剑鱼的嘴等一切可以用来攻击的武器自卫，并最终赶走了这群鲨鱼。但大鱼的肉已经被吃了一大半，而老人还风趣地批评自己的左手“该工作的时候却在休息”的时候，我也被老人乐观的精神所折服。在生活中，有些损失是不可避免的，我们应该以乐观的态度来对待，不能斤斤计较。

最后，小说以一个少年看到老渔夫在度量足有十八英尺长的大马林鱼，再次描写了这条鱼的巨大，说明老渔夫所克服的困难之大，非比寻常。

小说歌颂了老渔夫不畏艰险努力奋斗的精神，我们也应该像他那样，不能满足于现状，应该积极向上，做任何事都要坚持不懈，遇到困难要迎难而上，决不能半途而废。只有这样，我们才能获得更大的成功和胜利。

【真正的勇士】

他说：“一个人可以被毁灭，但不能被打败。”我轻轻地合上书本，细细地咀嚼着这句话，内心犹如汹涌澎湃的大海，久久不能平静。

初读海明威先生写的《老人与海》，故事主要讲了一个名叫圣地亚哥的古巴老渔夫，接连出海八十四天没有捕到一条鱼，终于在第八十五天钓到了一条他有生以来见到的最大的马林鱼——它足足大过自己的渔船数倍。他竭尽全力，经过两天两夜的奋战，终于将大鱼捕获，绑在船边。但是在归途中，因大马林鱼伤口上的鱼腥味，遭到鲨鱼群的疯狂袭击，老人在疲惫不堪中却仍然不愿放弃，在缺水、少食、受伤的情况下与鲨鱼群展开了殊死搏斗，硬是击退了鲨鱼群，即使最后回到海港时，绑在船边的大马林鱼只剩下一副光秃秃的空骨架。海明威的这篇小说，塑造的就是这样一个“硬汉”形象。

再品小说：在茫茫大海上，一个年迈的老人苦等八十四天无鱼上钩却仍然不放弃，这是一种坚持到底的相信;面对比自己渔船大数倍的大马林鱼不妥协，这是明知不可为而为之的勇气;面对为了抢食疯狂进攻的鲨鱼群毫不胆怯，奋起斗争，这是一种决不退缩、永不屈服的精神。小说中的老渔夫是精神世界里的强者，是真正的胜利者，是一个英雄!

回想起自己初学游泳时，我一直只敢在浅水区游，对于深水区不敢尝试，总是畏难而怯，没有信心和勇气去迎接挑战。对比《老人与海》中的老人，我惭愧不已，他的这种自信、自强的精神正是我所缺少的。困难和挫折每个人都会遇到，面对困难，我们要鼓起勇气，坚定信念，百折不挠。我想这就是这本书带给我们的启发意义。

上甘岭战役中，舍身堵枪眼的黄继光，是英雄;“横眉冷对千夫指，俯首甘为孺子牛”的文坛巨匠鲁迅先生，是英雄;2003年，非典爆发，始终在医疗最前线救死扶伤的钟南山院士，是英雄;中国太空第一人的宇航员杨利伟，是英雄;“中国天眼之父”南仁东教授，是英雄;四川九寨沟地震救灾现场不知名的武警战士，是英雄……事实证明，我们是英雄辈出的国度，不同的年代，不同的行业，我们的国家从来不缺少英雄，他们的内心都有着坚定的信念，都是遇到困难迎难而上的英雄，都有着锲而不舍的精神，他们是中国的脊梁，是真正的勇士，是新时代的我们学习的榜样!

《老人与海》每次品读都让我感触极深。同学们，如果你也想成为勇者，就与我一起来读一读这本书吧。

Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”， the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”， her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.

I have never thought so thin a book which is called The Catcher in the Rye can influence me so much. It makes me feel very impressive. And after reading this book， I have aroused many thoughts about it.

In todays literature world， The Catcher in the Rye is to be recognized as a modern classic. After reading this book， adults can increase the understanding of teenagers; young people can increase the understanding of their future life. No matter whom after reading this book will improve their ability about to be vigilant against the reality. It also can make you choose one self-reliance way to your future easily.

This book told us a profound significance story. The of this novel Holden hated all the hypocritical things and really wanted to pursuit the pure reality at first. Because of the development of his society， he finally submits to the development process of the social reality. It deeply show the loneliness， loss， pain of younger generation which is grow up after the World War II in U.S.

Well， I think that though Holden used to seeing the reality of Bourgeois society， and he must promise with realistic society in the end， he also have many courage to have a try to rebel against the hypocritical world. This spirit should be set up if we want to improve the process of the world.

Now， we live in a country， which is in great reformation， and everything in the process of changing development. Well， with the development of our country; peoples thought also is in the change. At the same time， many peoples thoughts start confusion and depression. They forgotten their initial dreams and have no enthusiasm gradually. So， in the end， they began to yearn for mediocrity and have nothing to do.

Perhaps we can learn from this book to find our own shadow. To a certain extent that it reflects many characteristics of the adolescents， and we can also see the dark side of the society. With the materials progress， the spiritual world is inevitably producing some changes. At that time， what we need is a change which can make our dream into a reality. Therefore， what we should do is not to hope， not to wait， not to plain， but from now on， just start from your own efforts and watch your initial dream. Youd try your best to create the life you want with your own hands.

轻轻地合上《老人与海》这本书，我的心久久不能平静。

一句“一个人并不是生来要给打败的。你尽可以消灭它，可就是打不败他。”的话给了我勇于克服困难的信心和成长的启示，我将把它当作人生的座佑铭，成为我人生路上的一盏明灯。

书中描写老渔夫圣地亚哥84天没捕到鱼，但他没放弃，终于在第85天，他发现了一条1500磅的大马哈鱼。“明知不可为而为之”他跟大鱼说：“我跟你奉陪到底！”经过2天2夜的搏斗，老人获得胜利……这就是永不言败的精神，在生活中，在学习上各种困难和挫折如影随形，我们要么迎难而上，要么畏难止步。

记得有一次，我们全家趁着天气明媚去攀登九峰山。一来到山脚下，我抬头仰望这九峰山。山势陡峭，好像一不小心就要栽下来。我的心里有了想打退堂鼓的念头。爸爸看出了我的心思给我打气道：“别怕山的高度有多高，山有多陡，你就一步一步地爬，一步一步地走。”就这样坚持了下去，来到了半山腰，我浑身被汗湿透了，腿也软了，脚也痛了，肚子也饿得“咕咕”叫了，一屁股坐在路旁的大青石上，再也不想起来了。这时，爸爸又鼓励我说“行百里者半九十”，你可不能半途而废哦！”我闭上眼睛，脑海里出现了一片大海，一个倔强的老人费力地驾着小船，在风浪里颠簸，手里紧紧抓着渔竿，前方那条大鱼还在不停翻滚挣扎。“我跟你奉陪到底”老人的话仿佛通过时空的传递再一次响起在我的耳边。我猛地睁开眼睛，抬腿便向山顶走去，最终登上了山顶。

时隔多年，每当我想起这次登山的经历，总会情不自禁地想起那个孤身搏斗在大海深处的老人。人生路上，成功与失败，欢乐与沮丧，相生相伴，只有敢于拼搏，永不言败，才能涉及险滩，穿过荆棘，走向理想的彼岸，才能收获成功，实现价值。

《老人与海》这本书让我一生受用。

《老人与海》是新课标推荐给学生的必读书之一，很长一段时间我无法对它喜欢起来，曾今在班里读过几页，面对学生淡淡的反应，让我一度觉得这本书无法欣赏，一本连我自己都无法读出味道的书要读给学生听，学生自然不会买我的帐，读过几页之后这本书很自然的被我打入了冷宫。

救它出冷宫的是黄黄的书签上的一句话“海明威，美国作家因《老人与海》一书一举获得诺贝尔文学奖。”我很惊讶，这样一本薄薄的书为什么能拿到诺贝尔文学奖?一时兴起百度了一下，找到了很多关于这本书的一些简介和价值剖析以及其他人的一些读后感，渐渐地我也产生了读读的这本书的欲望，于是有了我与这本书的二次会面。

借助他人的阅读提示和一探究竟的心情花了三个晚上读完了这本书。有三点至今在脑海里回荡：

一、桑迪亚哥太强大了。他，一无所有，穷，年老，身体不好。但是却也是世界上最富有的人，八十七天没有抓到鱼，仍然坚持出海，仍然坚信自己一定能够抓到一条大鱼让渔村里的人大吃一惊，八十七天他承受的是怎样的压力啊?我想到了我们的公开课，如果我八十七节课都没有上好，我敢开公开课吗?我的内心还会有那种自信和热情吗?恐怕都怕了吧。

二、很善良的故事。小男孩很善良，虽然家人的逼迫使得他不得不离开老人的渔船，但是他从未放弃关心老人，照顾老人的生活，陪他说话，为他担心，老人归海后小男孩红着双眼坚决的说“谁也不许打扰他。”不禁让我眼泪盈眶，那是真正的疼爱呀，有爱再简短的话都充满力量。老人也是善良的，他很穷，但是他记得每一个对他好的人，捕鱼归来，身体都还没恢复，首先想到的是如何分那条大鱼，分给曾今帮助过他的每一个人，感恩和善良亦是一种伟大的人格，不得不令人肃然起敬。

三、一种伟大的力量。老人与大鱼搏斗让我们看到的不是人与动物的厮杀，不是血腥的场面，看到的只是一种英雄之间惺惺相惜的疼，老人和大鱼都是英雄，老人要杀死大鱼，但他斗的是智慧，他尊重自己的对手。还记得老人曾说过一句话：“在大海里没有谁是真正孤单的。”海的宽广无垠也孕育了无限的孤单寂寞，我想只有真正懂得他的人才能在寂寞的海面上唱出欢欣的歌吧。在这本书里人、动物和大自然是融为一体的，桑迪亚哥用智慧和毅力征服了大海，也征服了读他的人。

倘若细细品味，这本书里很多的句子都会给人以无限的启发，值得再读。