高考英语写作策略研究方案精选20篇

最近，安徽利辛26岁女子李娟被恶犬咬成重伤的事，持续在网络发酵。李娟的家人多次向媒体表示，9月初的一个晚上，李娟在下班回家途中，救了一名被两条大狗追逐的小女孩，自己却横遭不测。她的遭遇引发不少人士的捐助，目前爱心款已超过80万元。

但是，由于事发当时没有监控，也没有目击者，情况究竟什么样?现代快报记者赶赴李娟的老家安徽利辛展开调查，发现情节大逆转，真相令人震惊。李娟并非在回家路上受伤，而是在一家养狗场内被狗咬伤的，而这家养狗场的主人，正是她的男朋友张宏宇。在南京的医院里，张宏宇也承认，自己撒了谎，但他表示，所有善款将用于女友治疗。

前情：现代快报记者辗转联系上安徽媒体人“@记者柯南”，他表示，大约一个多月前，自己曾经接到过这家人的求助。“一个同行给我打电话，说我‘脑子好’，问我能不能帮这家人策划策划。”后来，张宏宇和女孩的一位亲戚联系上“@记者柯南”，“他们跟我说的大概，就是女孩为救人被狗咬了。”两人表示，为李娟治病，家里当时已经花了很多钱，经济上实在跟不上。考虑到马上要去南京做植皮手术，至少还需要三四十万资金，他们希望通过媒体，呼吁社会人士的救助。并表示，在得到捐款后，会“好好感谢”他。

“这么做肯定违背职业道德，我拒绝了，但考虑到女孩需要帮助，我也了解了一下这件事，发现在他们提供的信息里，没有被帮助的小女孩、没有狗主人、也没有目击者，只是男方的单方面叙述，第一反应就是假新闻，因此没有报道。”而这件事这两天被报道出来后，火遍了全国，这让他惊讶不已。

在众多证据相互印证下，昨天，在医院楼下，张宏宇终于向现代快报记者说了实话，李娟见义勇为的事，确属编造，“我撒谎是事实，我承认我错了。”但他表示，这样做都是为了女友，所有善款也都会用在女友治疗上。张宏宇称，之所以编造这样一个故事，是因为之前为女友治病已花费了四五十万，其中不少是借的，到10月份，由于资金跟不上，李娟已经停药一段时间，于是他开始向各个媒体、爱心组织求助，在向某家媒体投递材料的时候，为引发关注，他加上了救人后被狗咬的情节，“当时只想着救人，没有想那么多。” 他说，事情报道出来后，影响越来越大，只好“将错就错”。而且这件事李娟并不知情，“我是这两天才告诉她的。”

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

1．词语选择的重要性

在The Right Word at the Right Time的“序言”中，编者对词语选用的重要性作了一个很好的比喻：“Using the right word at the right time is rather like wearing appropriate clothing for the occasion：

it is a courtesy to others，and a favor to yourself-a matter of presenting yourself well in the eyes of the world."

显然，说话或写文章时用词适当比穿着适当难度大得多，因而也具有更大的重要性。在我国，古人写文章时常为一个词语的选用具思苦想，因而有“语不惊人死不休”的说法。

成语“一字值千金”也说明了选择词语的极端重要性。有时“一字之差”造成令人遗憾的败笔，或招致成千上万的经济损失。这些反面的教训也告诉我们必须重视词语选用的问题。

2．词语选择的可能性

实际上，我们每个人的脑子里都有了一个或大或小的词库，只要我们肯去发掘，往往可以得到更好的表达方式。这是我们做好词语选用的主观条件。

从客观条件广看，我们有各种类型的词典和参考书，只要我们平时多翻译、多阅读，写作时勤查考，就会在词语选用上不断进步。当然，一部好词典也不会毫无缺点，更难以面面俱到，因此在这里我们应牢牢记住著名英国作家、评论家和辞书编纂家Johson的话：

​导语：道歉信不难写，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

假定你是李华，与留学生朋友Bob约好一起去书店，因故不能赴约。请给他写封邮件，内容包括：

1.表示歉意;

2.说明原因;

3.另约时间。

注意：

1.词数100左右;

2.可以适当增加细节，以使行文连贯。

范文：

Dear Bob,

I’m sorry to say that I cannot go to the bookstore with you on Friday afternoon. I have just found that I have to attend an important class meeting that afternoon. I hope the change will not cause you too much trouble.

Shall we go on Saturday morning? We can set out early so that we’ll have more time to read and select books. If it’s convenient for you, let’s meet at 8:30 outside the school gate. If not, let me know what time suits you best. I should be available any time after school next week.

Yours,

Li Hua

【参考译文】

很抱歉，我不能和你一起去书店星期五下午。我刚刚发现我要参加一个下午的重要的课堂。我希望这个变化不会给你带来太大的麻烦。

我们星期六上午去好吗?我们可以早出发，以便我们有更多的时间来阅读和选择书。如果方便的话，我们8:30在校门口见面。如果没有，让我知道什么时候最适合你。我应该在放学后的任何时间都在学校。

一、写作要领

考生无论遇到哪一类试题，都要仔细审题，根据题目的要求确定文章的类型和中心内容，并对你自己熟悉的、可写的内容进行筛选、整理、规划、列出提纲，这是很重要的一步。提纲列好后，要围绕提纲内容展开说明自己的观点和结论，不要在写作时抛开提纲。一篇好的作文应该具备以下5个方面：

(1)内容切题，主题鲜明。

(2)表达清楚准确，条理清晰。

(3)结构完整，衔接流畅自然。

(4)句法正确多样。

(5)用词恰当丰富。

二、方法与步骤

1．提纲

提纲是写作一篇文章的详细计划、安排。提纲准备的目的是：

(1)计划要写什么。

(2)文章的思想的表达顺序。

(3)如何安排段落。

(4)使写作从头到尾围绕主题进行。内容一般用短语和词。主题、副题表达先后顺序，要用数字标明。提纲内容的安排是写作一篇好文章的关键。

2．依据提纲写作

(1)初稿

在完成提纲安排后，动笔写作的第一步是打初稿，在写初稿时要争取做到心中有数，胸有成竹，经过反复练习后，能够按照提纲安排落笔成文，一气呵成。如果突发奇想，也可修改提纲，顺理成章，但切忌偏离正题。在初稿写作时要有意识加大行距，为文章的修改留有余地。

(2)定稿及修改方法

在完成初稿后，修改是必不可少的过程。修改文章要注意以下几点：

①内容是否切题，论点是否鲜明，论证是否合理、严密。

②段落衔接时过渡使用是否合理，语句是否通顺、有没有语法错误，用词是否恰当。

③拼写是否正确，标点符号、大小写是否有错误，有无其他笔误。

导语：众人拾柴火焰高，团队的力量是强大的，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的有关团队的英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

As teamwork is increasingly important in modern society，everyone should train his ability to cooperate with others.

Todays society is no longer a self-sufficient one，but one in which all the people depend on each other for existence.Only for existence，not to mention the pursuit and obtainment of happiness，one cant do without the ability to work harmoniously with others.In the highly developed society today，one can almost accomplish nothing without joint efforts.Every loaf of bread，every article of clothes，every house or apartment，every means of transportation is the product of cooperative efforts.We play with other children in kindergartens;we study with our classmates at schools;and we will work with our fellow workers or colleagues in factories or companies. What we have got through teamwork is not only self-improvement，personal success but also the satisfaction at both our devotion to common causes and the sense of collective honor.

To meet the needs of both personal improvement and the sophisticated society，we should learn to cooperate with each other and adjust to each other.Only in this way can we achieve successes and satisfy ourselves as well as the society.

【参考译文】

在现代社会中团队精神越来越重要，每个人都应该培养自己与他人合作的能力。

当今社会不再是自给自足的，所有的人都是互相依存。只为了生存，更不用说追求与获得幸福就这样了，人不能缺乏与他人和谐相处的能力。在今天高度发达的社会，没有共同努力一个人几乎是一事无成。每一块面包，每一件衣服，每一个房子或公寓，各种交通运输工具都是团队努力的结果。我们在幼儿园与其他小孩一起玩;我们在学校和我们的同学一起学习;我们将与我们的伙伴或在工厂或公司的同事一起工作。通过团队合作我们得到了什么，不仅是自我完善，个人成功，而且也有共同目标的的贡献和集体荣誉感的满足。

为了同时满足个人完善和复杂的社会需求，我们应该学会互相合作和互相适应。只有这样我们才能获得成功，满足自己和社会。

导语：人的一生，从小到大，得到足够成长的标志可不就是“自己照顾自己”?下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的作文素材，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢! ​

有时候，别人说过的经意或不经意的一句话，你当时并不以为然，不会放在心上。也许以后的某个时刻，也许是多年后的某一天，蓦然想起，重新回味起来，可能是会心一笑，可能会意识到自己的后知后觉。

那年搭杜老师的车去苏州。一路上东聊西聊，六、七个小时的行程中，彼此就交待了很多的悲欢离合人生大计甚至家长里短。说起父母对我们姐妹的关爱之情，我讲了个小细节，那就是每次离开父母家回自己家，我爸在估计我们到家后，往往会打电话问一句“你们到家啦……”后来我们回到家就会主动打电话给父母报一声平安。这似乎已经成为家庭习惯。

杜老师听了，问道：你有没有想过?到底发生了什么事或没发生什么事?让父母对自己如此不放心?

说起家里的这个生活细节时，我是颇为自己的家庭氛围自豪的。她这么问，我楞了一下，不知如何作答，也没深入去想。

但这是个问题。偶尔还是会想起。

不止父母对子女如此，我们对父母也是这样。

有一年我爸妈去东北。行程期间恰好发生了一起杀人犯通缉事件，我对那条沸沸扬扬的新闻当然也有留意。我妹妹把那条消息推给我，我知道她也有所担心父母的安全，就回复道：相信咱爸妈运气好!(潜台词：不会遇到通缉犯)

这种担心其实很多余，遇到的几率几乎为零，但也属于“情不自禁”。

后来看过一篇名为《担心就是诅咒》的文章。觉得非常有道理，便拿回家跟爸妈分享。

文章里引用了证严法师的话：如果父母常常担心他的孩子，他的孩子会没有福气。因为福气都被父母给担心掉了。法师还说“如果父母希望他的孩子有福气，就要多多祝福他的孩子，而不是担心他的孩子。”

最近几年，发现每次的家庭聚会后，父母已不会再像从前那样叮嘱一句“回到家来个电话”，或打电话跟我们确认是否“安全到家”。

也许是父母真的上了年纪的缘故，也许是父母对我们已经足够放心、相信我们能照顾好自己。我宁愿相信是后者。

大年初二回娘家。全家十一口人聚齐，饭前我爸要求每人说句话。我妹妹说的特别好：谢谢爸爸妈妈，把自己照顾得这么好，不需要我们操心。新的一年，相信我们每个人都能够照顾好自己……

我妈去年有次轻微脑血栓。住院的几天里，我们姐妹仨争相要去陪床，我爸坚决不同意，让我们好好上班，说他自己照顾我妈就行。结果住院、陪护、出院的各种手续，都是他自己办理的，而且入院、出院，坐的都是公交车。

即便是自己的女儿，他们也不想麻烦，理由是“我们自己能照顾自己。”并且专门叮嘱我们“不要把你妈住院的消息告诉别人……”我爸妈都是不愿给别人添麻烦的人。

想起父母家房子拆迁，几次的搬家、租房我们几乎都没出力，后来房子装修也是我爸自己操持的。大表姐有次说：俺舅那么大年纪了，装修的事你们让他自己弄，太操心了……

这是十年前的事了。每每想起，就觉得自己很没用，很不孝顺;每每想到爸妈拒绝我们的帮助，就觉得很“受伤”。后来也是看到一篇文章，就释然了。

台大外文系刘毓秀教授接到小区警卫的数落电话：“教授，你九十岁的爸爸刚刚扛着一包米经过小区大门，外人看了都不忍心，你们是怎么当儿女的?”

刘教授说：“最好的孝顺，就是不孝。”日本作家岸见一郎在他的新书《面对父母老去的勇气》一书中，提到当父母老了，子女应该找机会，换一种方式来爱他。我的方式就是，“有事，弟子不服其劳。”刘教授，现在子女被传统孝道捆绑，眼见父母衰老，为了降低罪恶感，就找外佣来照料，陪着走路、喂食、打理，让老人自理能力越来越差。

我爸妈都没读过这样的文章，却是这种理论的践行者——自立、自理、尊严。

前些日子有个读者在后台发来很长的留言。她公婆家在外地，结婚后自己住得离父母很近，由于父母重男轻女，并不帮自己照顾刚生的小孩。因为父母家的琐事，也导致老公不满，决定回自己家乡，她又要照看刚生下的小孩，又要照顾母亲(父亲在外地打工，她觉得五十多岁的母亲需要照顾)，又焦虑要不要跟老公一起回家乡，半年多瘦了二十多斤……

我当时只是简单地回复了几句话：要跟你老公好好沟通，谈谈自己的感觉;要相信父母有能力照顾好自己……你该过自己的生活。

我有个前同事春节前刚生了二宝。记得当年她辞职时我俩面谈，我问：你爸妈知道你(想)辞职的事吗?

她说：我跟我老公商量好了。辞职的事，不用跟我爸妈说，他们年纪也大了。

我当时就立刻反省了自己的心智模式。觉得她年纪虽然比我轻，但在这方面却成熟的多。是啊，自己已经成年了、成家了，该为自己负责了，辞职这样的事为什么还要报告父母?

李中莹老师曾讲过父母的责任是：帮孩子——自己照顾自己，给世界一份正面影响。

人的一生，从小到大，得到足够成长的标志可不就是“自己照顾自己”?

孩子能够“自己照顾自己”，是做父母的一分欣慰;父母年老之时能够“自己照顾自己”，是做子女的一种福气。

“自己照顾好自己”，才是对家人最好的爱。

all the same 仍然,照样的

as regards 关于,至于

anything but 根本不

as a matter of fact 实际上

apart from 除...外(有/无)

as a rule 通常,照例

as a result(of) 因此,由于

as far as ...be concerned 就...而言

as far as 远至,到...程度

as for 至于,关于

as follows 如下

as if 好像,仿怫

as good as 和...几乎一样

as usual 像平常一样,照例

as to 至于,关于

all right 令人满意的;可以

as well 同样,也,还

as well as 除...外(也),即...又

aside from 除...外(还有)

at a loss 茫然,不知所措

at a time 一次,每次

at all 丝毫(不),一点也不

at all costs 不惜一切代价

at all events 不管怎样,无论如何

at all times 随时,总是

at any rate 无论如何,至少

at best 充其量,至多

at first 最初,起先

at first sight 乍一看,初看起来

at hand 在手边,在附近

at heart 内心里,本质上

at home 在家,在国内

at intervals 不时,每隔...

at large 大多数,未被捕获的

at least 至少

at last 终于

at length 最终,终于

at most 至多,不超过

at no time 从不,决不

by accident 偶然

at one time 曾经,一度;同时

at present 目前,现在

at sbs disposal 任...处理

at the cost of 以...为代价

at the mercy of 任凭...摆布

at the moment 此刻,目前

at this rate 照此速度

at times 有时,间或

back and forth 来回地,反复地

back of 在...后面

before long 不久以后

beside point 离题的,不相干的

beyond question 毫无疑问

by air 通过航空途径

by all means 尽一切办法,务必

by and by 不久,迟早

by chance 偶然,碰巧

by far 最,...得多

by hand 用手,用体力

by itself 自动地,独自地

by means of 用,依靠

by mistake 错误地,无意地

by no means 决不,并没有

by oneself 单独地,独自地

by reason of 由于

by the way 顺便说说

by virtue of 借助,由于

by way of 经由,通过...方法

due to 由于,因为

each other 互相

even if/though 即使,虽然

ever so 非常,极其

every now and then 时而,偶尔

every other 每隔一个的

except for 除了...外

face to face 面对面地

People hold different views about X. Some people are of the opinion that 观点1, while others point out that 观点2. As far as I am concerned, the former/latter opinion holds more weight. For one thing, 论据1. For another, 论据2.

Last but not the least, 论据3.

To conclude, 总结观点. As a college student, I am supposed to 表决心. 或 From above, we can predict that 预测.

议论文，分析事实，论证道理，当然要遵循一定的思维规律;这种思维规律反映在文章的外部形态上，就是具有一定体式的文章的结构。下面是小编为你整理的超实用的高考议论文写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

一、议论文的结构合体

议论文，分析事实，论证道理，当然要遵循一定的思维规律;这种思维规律反映在文章的外部形态上，就是具有一定体式的文章的结构。怎样写议论文才算“合体”呢?

一是根据议论问题的一般思维模式，应当是按“提出问题、分析问题、解决问题”( 或曰“引论”、“本论”、“结论”) 三大块构成。“提出问题 ”即在议论文开头一般要鲜明地提出中心论点，“分析问题”即在文章的中间要围绕中心论点展开分析论证，“解决问题”即在文章的结尾部分或者得出综合性结论， 或者提出前瞻性希望等。这一点，众所周知，兹不赘述。

二是分析问题即本论部分，要按一定的向度分层展开论述。所谓“向度”即论述展开的方向。这个“向度”有四个： 是什么，为什么，怎么样，何果。一般情况下， 一篇中学生议论文作文，其本论部分只要从这四个向度中选择一个或者两个展开即可。但无论是从哪个向度展开， 其分论点之间都要形成一定的联系。一般来说，有并列式、递进式和对照式三种。

所谓并列式，就是围绕中心从同一个向度列出几个分论点，逐一论证。如果仅仅围绕一个向度写，那么几个分论点之间的关系大多是并列关系 .

递进式同并列式结构相比，除了论点之间的意义联系不同以外，其段落的结构模式与并列式相同，就不再说了。

所谓对照式，就是从论题的正反两个方面入手，进行正反对比论证得出结论。其优点是结构简洁，论证充分，容易上手。最简单的对照式是在提出观点后，一段从正面论证观点，一段从反面论证观点，最后得出结论。还有一种对照式结构是在正面进行论述或者摆出论据后，紧接着用转折或者假设的方式从反面展开论述。

二、思路入格

议论文是论述问题的，当然要有一定的思路，即议论文各部分之间要有必然的内在联系。我们知道，议论文是论证问题的，你在提出议论文论点后，就要摆事实，讲道理，让你提出的论点令人信服地确立起来。因此，中心论点和各分论点之间就应当是因果联系，即中心论点是“果”,分论点是“因”.这个因果联系就是议论文的思路之“格”.作为一个高中生的议论文作文，最起码要做到在中心论点和各分论点之间 ,论点和论据之间要有一定的因果联系。

学生提出中心论点后，只要围绕中心论点问一个“为什么”,就能找到提出分论点的方向。如中心论点是“只有坚守，才能使人的思想品德升华，才能成就一番事业”.稍加分析，就可发现这个观点是在说“坚守”的重要性，于是，分论点就要回答“为什么坚守很重要”这个问题。那么就可从“为什么”和“何果”这两个向度来立分论点。如“坚守是一种执着，使绝望变成希望”,“坚守是一种信念，使普通变得高尚”,“坚守是一种职责，使平凡变得伟大”.如果我们要检验这三个分论点和中心论点之间有没有必然的内在联系的话，只需在这三个分论点之前加上“因为”,在“坚守很重要”之前加上“所以”,再连起来念一下即可。

同样，分论点和议论文的论据之间，也应当是因果联系。如在“坚守是一种职责，使平凡变得伟大”这个分论点后面，就可这样展开论述：“边防战士的坚守，使国家安定祥和;人民教师的坚守，使桃李满天下;白衣天使的坚守，使病魔为之屈服。”又如在“自由是思想的漫飞”这个分论点下可以这样展开论述：“行动可以受制于客观现实，思想却永远享受绝对的自由。有了这份思想的自由，才有了集豪放与浪漫于一身的诗仙李白;才有了身陷囹圄还在感叹‘故国不堪回首月明中’的落魄后主李煜;才有了向往‘面朝大海，春暖花开’的天才诗人海子。总之，因为这份思想的自由，社会才会在其牵引之下不断地进步，才会创造出一个个永载史册的人类奇迹。”

三、粘连有术

一篇像样的议论文，除了议论文的结构合体、思路入格外，还有更重要的一个方面，就是对论点的恰当阐述和对论据的中肯分析;没有这样的阐述和分析，议论文论点论据就不能粘连起来，而这个粘连是有“术”的。

(一) 观点+过渡+事例+分析

这个步骤中最重要的是“过渡”和“分析”.所谓“过渡”就是要在观点和事例之间，用适当的词句来勾连，以接通文气，使观点和议论文材料在语言形式上畅通无阻。所谓“分析”,就是事例叙述完之后，还必须对事例进行适当的分析评论，指出其本质特点，使事例和论点在内容上联结在一起。

(二) 观点+过渡+论据+分析+归纳

这种议论文论证方式就是在第一种的基础上加了一个“归纳”.所谓归纳，就是从多个事例中提炼出必然性的东西。既然要从多个事例中提炼，那么，“论据”部分，就应是两个或三个以上。

(三) 一般道理+个别道理

即“演绎推理法”.前面的分析归纳是从个别到一般，而演绎推理法是从一般到个别，用普遍性的真理(论据)来证明特殊的论点的方法。

如果完成了以上三步走，大概就能写出像样的议论文了。

优秀范文：教育公平与分配正义

一组言简意赅的漫画，直指教育的核心目的，引人深思。漫画中，考过100分的优生因退步两分而受惩罚，而原只有55分的差生因考了61分而受到奖励。表面上是在讽刺当今教育的不公平，实则是在扣问教育的最终目的——培养精英或是鼓励差生?

我的回答是后者，教育的目的不应简单地以功利主义的结果论来裁决，而应以培养并激发普通人的潜能使之有能力追求更高的美以及更幸福的生活为宗旨。这就解释了为什么98分的优生考得比61分的差生好却遭到惩罚。因为教育的初衷是让他们突破自我的桎梏，而非同他人比较。

这组漫画在现实生活中的具体表现，莫过于今年沿海地区高校招生名额向西北内陆转移而引发的史上最大的家长维权活动。表面上看有能力考98分的考生无法获得优质教育资源，而仅仅只考61分的西北地区考生却能轻松上名校是一种不合乎逻辑的行为，是违背教育资源分配公平的行为。然而，细剖背后错综复杂的社会背景以及道德哲学的充分考量。我们必须承认：这是完全符合教育公平的原则以及分配正义的要求的。

西方哲学家罗尔斯在《正义论》中曾指出：“社会公平的基本原则就是分配正义。”这其中的“社会公平”涉及人类生活的各个方面。当然也包括教育公平的问题。当前中国高校优质教育资源紧张的情况下，政策的倾斜看似荒谬不合理，实则是为了最大程度上地维护教育公平分配正义。我们不能否认沿海考生的努力及成就，但受制于不同地区发展不均衡的影响，让沿海考生与西北内陆的考生同台竞技，无疑只会加剧教育资源分布不均和不同地域关系的紧张程度。因此，适当地“照顾”西北考生，是我国教育理念的一次提升和进步。这说明传统的“择优取士”已逐渐向现代教育理念靠拢——无论是考过100分的优生，还是只有59分的差生，卷面的分数已不再是衡量教育成效的尺度，卓有成效地挖掘每个个体内在潜能并赋予个体追求自我幸福生活的能力，才是教育的终极目的。而要达到“有教无类，因材施教”的理论高度，就必须努力推广教育资源的公平以及分配正义的理念，让不同水平的人，不论是100的优生还是55分的差生，能享有同样的机遇去发挥自我的潜能。当然，这并不意味着忽视优生的培养，只是在一套相对公平的体制下，每个个体都能因自我的突破而获得嘉奖和鼓励。也需要有人鞭策退步的人奋发图强，这才是真正的教育公平与分配正义。

亚里士多德曾言：“教育活动的全部意义就在于培养具有美德的公民。”惩罚98分的优生和奖励61分的差生，都应在于培养共和国的公民，使之具有更高级的道德追求，而不应一味鼓励高分而扼杀天性。教育公平与分配正义的理念应当体现在当前的教育活动中。如此，方能有道德完善素质良好的公民撑起共和国的大厦，推动中国崛起!

We have an annual Mid-Autumn festival, I love Mid-Autumn festival, love its moon cakes golden and full, and love its beautiful moon circle.

Fifteen moon was round, so we decided to go to the moon in the evening of sixteen. Night, we came to the plaza, we sat down on the grass, didnt appear at that time the moon, the sky is dark blue, but in the square street lamps are festooned with colored lights, the street was filled with the festive atmosphere of the festival. People hold glowing fluorescent sticks in their hands, colorful and more beautiful in the streets. The moon seems to want to play hide-and-seek with us, never to appear. The sky had only a few scattered and faint stars. Suddenly there appeared some white in the sky, as if the moon were coming, watching the moon rising from the west. At this time the moon is not very round, there was no light, a dark clouds, the moon through the test of time and time again, finally with a perfect, beautiful gesture to show in front of people, the crowd trouble. The fireworks, the smile of fireworks and the moon made a beautiful scene. After a while, the fireworks ended and the crowd quieted down. Began to appreciate the moon, and I cant help but think of my grandma and grandpa in hometown, the Mid-Autumn festival is family reunion, how I want to my grandma and grandpa, can in the side with us to enjoy the night silent, beautiful, and the moon bright and tender. I hope the moon in my hometown is so beautiful, so round. In the moon seems to have so little drops shadow, it reminds me of the "chang e" of the story, the dribs and drabs shadows should is the goddess of the moon in the missing seed, "chang e should the regret steal the efficacious medicine, every night heart". Back home, our family around the table cut moon cakes, moon cakes have almond, ice skin, double yellow and so on, but my favorite double yellow, because it looks golden full, thin skin filling jing, taste palate is rich. Im going to eat mooncakes!

Qi shuang qiu gao, I love Mid-Autumn festival, also love the Mid-Autumn festival all customs, habits.

2005年英语考纲有重大变化，其中之一就是作文考查的变化。新增加一篇小作文，使作文考查由一篇变为两篇，而原来的大作文的字数也由“不少于200字”调整为“150至200字”，满分20分。新增的作文是一篇100字左右的应用性短文，文体包括有信件、便笺、备忘录等，满分10分。既然是新增题型，就不会太难，但不好预测文体，这就要求考生复习时力求面面俱到，掌握写作规律及注意事项，尤其是对常见的应用文体如书信等

大作文的写作一般会给考生写作提纲，或图表，图画，或图文并茂。命题方式虽然多样，但题目涉及面往往是考生比较熟悉的内容，目的是测定考生语言的实际应用能力。要求表达清楚，文字连贯，中心突出，内容丰富，句式多变，句子结构和用词正确。

语言的应用能力不可能一蹴而就，必须厚积薄发，必须经过长期的实践锻炼。在提高英语写作能力方面，我觉得：一是要背大量的优秀范文，整段整篇地背，并转换为自己的语言，写作时自己能随心所欲支配。考试时避免套用以前死记硬背的几个范文，把一些不达意的词堆积在一起，没有统一性，无法很好地表现主题；二是要多动手。包括对背过的文章进行词语替换，句式转换，句子重组等，以及对某一主题展开写作。多动手才能提高笔下功夫，才能保证在考场上顺利写作。可以说背诵范文是培养语感，积累素材，掌握写作方法，动手写作是实践，是最终目的，这两者结合起来，就是“理论联系了实际”。另外，背诵范文应有针对性，写作训练也是一样，在训练中要掌握每一类型作文的写作规律，根据其每一类作文的写作特点——如提纲式作文就要求考生根据提纲提示的思路和规定的要点展开段落——全面训练，但不要带有押题的心理，靠背几篇范文就能应付考试的心态是不可取的。

下面说一下英语写作过程中的注意事项

一、认真审题

作文第一步是仔细审题，考生要仔细阅读试题要求及相关信息，如图表，图画，数字等，准确把握出题者意图。考研作文忌信手掂来，提笔就写，根本不审题，想到哪儿就写到哪儿，或完全凭自己想象编故事，置考试要求于不顾， “下笔千言，离题万里”。比如1998是一幅卡通画，老母鸡申明外加一首打油诗，讽刺一些企业把该尽职之事作为推销产品的承诺。如果考生说老母鸡很可爱，但爱自夸，然后说自己某个同学也爱自夸，这就偏离主题。2000年的作文“A Brief Histiry of World Commercial Fishing ”.它给出了两张图，从1900年的渔船和鱼量之比到1995年的渔船和鱼量之比的变化谈如何保护渔业资源，应从商业性滥捕鱼这一主题展开话题，有的考生却大谈环境污染。这就偏离了主题，因为题中自始自终都没有谈到环境污染问题。

有的同学没有审题习惯，或担心时间不够草草审题，最后发现文不对题，草草收场，这就影响了英语成绩，同时也会影响后两门考试的考试心情。

二、列出提纲

考试规定的时间是很有限的，所以不能花太多时间准备一个详细的提纲，但关键词提纲或粗略提纲还是非常有必要的。对原始材料分析归纳后要形成一个基本的框架。文章打算分几段写，每段大概怎样写，自数控制在多少，开头段落是道破主题，点名要旨，引人入胜还是先给出主题一般的背景情况和对主题进行浓缩的陈述呢，中间段落和结尾有怎样写呢。这些都要心中有数。有的考生习惯用汉语构思文章，逐句翻译提纲，当碰到某个词卡住时就翻译不下去，僵在那里。要注意列提纲是为了更好更全面的表达主题。主题的表达可有多种形式，不一定非要寻找一个特定的词或句子。考试时考生要充分调动大脑，灵活运用以前所学知识。

三、开始写作

一篇文章往往由四部分组成，标题(title)，首段(opening paragraph),主体(body paragraph),结尾段( concluding paragraph)。标题要新颖，能引起读者兴趣，首段的内容根据文章的体裁而变化，比如议论文可以从一种现象，一种观点出发引出作者的观点。记叙文往往交代人物和故事背景。主体是文章的主要部分，通过合适的语篇模式表达一定的观点，考生要围绕中心按一定顺序分层次有重点的展开叙述，描写，议论。结尾段是对全文的总结，论点上要与前面的叙述一致和统一。写作时要注意以下几点。

1、要统一，连贯。

选择那些最能体现中心思想最具代表性的材料，这些材料要共同表达一致的信息。选材时切忌胡子眉毛一把抓。词语堆积，不伦不类。前后及段落之间在逻辑关系上要紧密衔接，不能把没有任何逻辑关系的词放在一起。可以用恰当的关联词把思想连贯的表达出来。

2、用词准确，语法正确

考试时要特别注意语法，此语，语气，标点符号等，为了避免太多单词拼写错误，语法错误，不要为了追求词语的华丽而堆积一些自己也没把握的单词，不要刻意追求长句而写一些自己不知对错的有多个从句组成的长句。考试时最好选择自己最有把握的词汇，短语，句式。

3、足够字数，卷面整洁

绝对不能字数不够，即使一句话颠来倒去说也要凑够字数。字数不够，即使写的非常精彩，也不能拿高分。

四、修改

英语写作时考生由于仓促，紧张等原因，很容易犯一些简单的，一眼就能发现的错误。所以考生一定要留出几分钟时间用于修改。不要大幅度进行修改，更不要因为修改破坏卷面整洁，影响阅卷老师心情。修改时可以从以下几点进行

1、语法

包括时态是否一致，主谓是否一致，名词单复数是否对应，被动主动语态是否错用等

2、词汇

包括连接上下句或段落的关联词，习惯用语，固定搭配，词类混淆，误用及物不及物动词等。

3、拼写和标点符号

高考英语作文需要将有自己的想法，并且掌握好写作的方法，这样英语才能得到高分。

1、审题：审题是做到切题的第一步。所谓审题就是要看清题意，确定文章的中心思想、主题，并围绕中心思想组织材料。

2、进行构思，列出简单的提纲，打造文章之骨架：审好题、立好意后，就要写提纲，打造文章的骨架。文章布局要做好几件事：安排好层次段落，铺设好过渡，处理好开头和结尾。

3、扩展成文：根据字数多少扩展成篇。扩展的内容一定要紧扣主题，千万不要写那些与主题不相关的内容。展开的方式包括：顺序法、举例法、比较法、对比法、说明法、因果法、推导法、归纳法和下定义等。可以根据需要任选一种或几种方式。

在这一步骤中还需注意三方面问题：

1)确保提纲中段落结构的思路与各段主题句的一致性。只有这样，才能保证所写段落不偏题、不跑题。

2)要综合考虑各个段落的内容安排，避免段落内容的交叉。

3)用好连接词，注意段落间、句子间的连贯性。要做到所写文章层次分明，思路清晰，文字连贯，就需要在句与句之间、段与段之间架起一座座桥梁，而连接词起的正是桥梁作用。

在扩展的过程中也有些窍门，以下几点可供参考：

1)在整篇文章中，避免只是用一两个句式或重复用同一词语。英语中存在着极为丰富的同义词，准确地使用同义词可以给读者清新的感觉。同时要灵活运用各种句式，如倒装句、强调句、省略句、主从复合句、对比句、分词短语、介词短语等，从而增加文章的可读性。

2)使用不同长度的句子。如果一个意思用一句话写不清楚的话，通过分句和合句或用两句、三句来表达，增强句子的连贯性和表现力。

3)改变句子的开头方式，不要总是以主、谓、宾、状的次序。可以把状语至于句首，或用分词等。

4)学会使用过渡词。

(1) 递进furthermore，moreover，besides，in addition，then，etc

(2) 转折however，but，nevertheless，afterwards，etc

(3) 总结finally，at last，in brief，to conclude，etc

(4) 强调really，indeed，certainly，surely，above a11，etc

(5) 对比in the same way，just as，on the other hand，etc

5)确定文章用第几人称写，基本时态是什么。使用人称时人物不能张冠李戴或指代不明。

时态要尽量保持一致。

4、检查修改：要检查复核，不要写完了事。

要留时间通读全文，修改可能出现的错误。检查上下文是否连贯，句子衔接是否自然流畅。检验的标准主要是句子是否通畅，该用连词的地方用了没有，所用的连词是否合适，是否有语法错误，主谓是否一致，动词的时态、语态、语气的使用是否正确，词组的搭配是否合乎习惯，是否有大小写、拼写、标点错误等，还有就是注意卷面整洁。

可归纳为：中心突出，主题明确;层次清楚，条理清晰; 表达力强，传情达意;语句通顺，句型多变;过渡自然，衔接紧凑;标点正确，大小无误;字迹清楚，卷面整洁。

高中英语写作常用开头句型

1.As far as …is concerned 就……而言

2.It goes without saying that… 不言而喻，…

3.It can be said with certainty that… 可以肯定地说……

4.As the proverb says， 正如谚语所说的，

5.It has to be noticed that… 它必须注意到，…

6.Its generally recognized that… 它普遍认为…

7.Its likely that … 这可能是因为…

8.Its hardly that… 这是很难的……

9.Its hardly too much to say that… 它几乎没有太多的说…

10.What calls for special attention is that…需要特别注意的是

11.Theres no denying the fact that…毫无疑问，无可否认

12.Nothing is more important than the fact that… 没有什么比这更重要的是…

13.whats far more important is that… 更重要的是…

导语：母亲，似乎永远是我们心里最柔软的地方，那么这根心弦是如何被拨动的?下面是小编整理的关于母爱的相关材料，欢迎阅读，谢谢!

最新一期的《朗读者》主题是“眼泪”，斯琴高娃朗读了作家贾平凹的一篇散文《写给母亲》。

母亲，似乎永远是我们心里最柔软的地方，那么这根心弦是如何被拨动的?我们先来看一下斯琴高娃的这段朗读吧。

关于“母亲”的角色

14岁登台，纵横影坛50多年，从雍容大气的西北老太太、底层小人物的党员二楞妈、到康熙皇帝背后贤德的孝庄，无数身份地位迥异的母亲角色，被斯琴高娃演绎出“一人千面”的境界。

董卿问：你在演母亲的角色的时候，会想到自己的母亲吗?

斯琴高娃：“戏中我演了这么多母亲的眼泪，其实都来源于戏外我母亲的眼泪，所以我演绎的很多人物身上都有我妈妈的影子。”

小老太太的眼泪

小老太太，斯琴高娃用这个词来称呼母亲。而关于母亲的形容词，斯琴高娃用得最多的是坚强。

1950年，斯琴高娃出生。1954年，斯琴高娃父亲去世。加上随之而来的六十年代的“困难时期”，可以说，斯琴高娃童年时期的生活并不轻松。面对种种艰辛，斯琴高娃说她母亲那时候很少哭泣。

“小老太太特别特别坚强”，斯琴高娃多次提及母亲的这种性格是如何影响她和她的兄弟姐妹。然而，有一次，她的母亲却流泪了……

有一回，在《康熙王朝》的拍摄现场，母亲看到了斯琴高娃扮演的80多岁的孝庄皇太后，结果，母亲一看女儿的装扮就哭了。

“看见女儿变得这么老，比我还老这么多，我心里接受不了，我知道这是假的，可是还是难过，不忍心看。”

听到这个原因的时候，我也不禁心头一酸。

想到筷子兄弟的那句歌词：“时光时光慢些吧，不要再让你变老了，我愿用我一生换你岁月长流。”一直以为是自己在担心父母变老，没想到，渐渐长大、变老的我们，同样让他们难过。

“我不会打扰你”

斯琴高娃是第一位获得金像奖的大陆女演员，有人评价她说是真正的表演艺术家!然而，一部部佳作背后却总是充满辛苦和伤痛。

在剧中，为了呈现出最佳效果，斯琴高娃曾三次坠马，第一次轻度脑震荡，第二次面部受伤，第三次更是严重到尾骨摔裂。

“变成半残废了，但是没关系，我还在坚持。”斯琴高娃继承着母亲的坚强和刚毅，她没有为这些流过眼泪，还调侃说掉眼泪也好不了。但面对这般情景，她家那个坚强的小老太太却常常流泪。

9年前，在斯琴高娃获得香港电影金像奖最佳女主角的前夕。有媒体拜访了当时已经有77岁的斯琴高娃老母亲。

在她家，无论是客厅，还是卧室，几乎任何能摆放照片的地方，老人家都放着斯琴高娃的照片，为女儿的成就而骄傲。不过，她最惦记女儿的一直还是，“如果累了，就别拍那么多戏了。”

而面对女儿的时候，斯琴高娃却说母亲很少夸她。母亲从来都默默支持她，每次看望她，还总会强调：“我不会打扰你，我不会打扰你。”

支持你、担心你、又不敢打扰你，这或许就是天下所有父母的影子。

你心有向往时，她支持你向前走;

你路上有坎坷的时候，她担心你受伤;

你往高峰不断攀登的时候，她在一旁，不敢打扰你。那个曾经被你惹得气急败坏的妈妈，终有一天变得“小心翼翼”。

“我妈一定还在牵挂着我”

为何选择贾平凹的这篇《写给母亲》，斯琴高娃回答说：人虽然是去了，一个在地上，一个在地下，阴阳相隔，但是互相的那种牵挂，是永生永世的。

文章里，作家贾平凹写到：

我觉得我妈还在，尤其我一个人静静地待在家里，这种感觉就十分强烈。我常在写作时，突然能听到我妈在叫我，叫得很真切，一听到叫声我便习惯地朝右边扭过头去。

当然是房间里什么也没有……或许，她在逗我，故意藏到挂在墙上的她那张照片里，我便给照片前的香炉里上香，要说上一句：我不累。

对于这种阴阳相隔的相互牵挂，斯琴高娃自己也说到：

“我常常会听到我妈妈在唱歌呀，真的，我妈妈的喜怒哀乐，那些表情历历在目，好像都是忘不了的。”

所以，当她读到最后这几句的时候，“妈是死了，我在地上，她在地下，阴阳两隔，母子再也难以相见，顿时热泪肆流，长声哭泣啊。”她哭了，董卿哭了，全场观众也都哭了……

就像一个网友说的那样：她读得很慢，但读着读着，我眼泪就下来了。

有人说，世界上也唯有母亲，是可以为儿女榨干最后一滴血的。

【题目】

阅读下面的文字，根据要求写一篇不少于800字的文章。

在某中学读书的一名学生，总觉得自己屈才。和班上同学比，自己成绩稍差，他就抱怨老师“水平太低”，参加市里的中学生作文比赛没获奖，他又抱怨比赛组织者“有眼无珠”；父母都是普通百姓，他就经常埋怨他们没能耐，不能为自己的未来创造优越的条件……

有一天，他的一位朋友倾听了她的叙说，沉默片刻，说：“为什么我听到的全都是别人的错误和责任？个人在他自己的学习、工作、生活中，应该学会承担起自己的责任，让自己对自己负责啊。”

读了以上材料你有什么感想？写一篇不少于800字的文章。

要求选准角度，明确立意，自选文体，自拟标题；不要脱离材料内容及含义的范围作文，不要套作，不得抄袭。

【写作指导】

此则材料卒章显志：“个人在他自己的学习、工作、生活中，应该学会承担起自己的责任，让自己对自己负责啊。”可以这样表述最佳立意：

1、 自己的路要自己走。

2、勇于担当，不要抱怨。

导语：拥抱春天的美丽，捕捉春天的感动。与大自然相约，与春天共舞。与绿色相约，与阳光共舞。感受春天的温馨，感受春天带给我们的喜悦与悸动。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的描写春天的精彩段落摘抄，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

1.春天是一位魔法师，用魔法棒驱走了寒冷，唤醒了沉睡的生灵。春天如一幅美丽的图画，色彩鲜明，带给人们无限的明朗。

2.姑娘披着美丽的春光，牵着情人的手，走进了幽深的花丛，人面桃花两相溶，姑娘的脸上的红晕与刚刚吐蕊的桃花分不清了，春天来了!

3.这时候阳光正以缓缓流动的韵律，惬意地梳理着绒绒的羽毛。几朵白云漫步在天宇之下，悠悠地绽放着蓝天的翅膀。所有阴暗的心情，都在此时打开了蔚蓝的天空。

4.在这样温馨的氛围里，一只可爱的小鸟，看起来心情不错，一边欣喜地飞舞着，一边用啾啾的颤音，适时地送来了清新的问候。如刚刚开化的河水，叮咚着季节的曲调。

5.和三四月份的春天的热热闹闹、异彩纷呈不同，初春时节，春天的声音还是静悄悄的，她默默行走着，她无声哺育着，她只是一股布设活力的气息源泉，旋转、飘荡、洋溢着，编织着一个春的意象、春的远景，编排着春花缤纷次第开放的序列密码。

6.伴着春风，春雨如约降临，然而却是那样的悄无声息。绵绵的细雨淅淅沥沥地下个不停，如丝如缕，将天地万物笼罩其中，洗尽铅尘，洗去浮华，荡涤去冬天枯败的气息。行人撑起一把把彩色的花伞，如怒放的花朵，扮亮了阴郁的天空。

7.初春时节，阳光冉冉，雪融冰化，天气渐暖，丝丝寒意依旧弥留在空气里，呼吸着一份春光的温暖，亦能感受到一份雪气的清凉，这是多么珍贵的一股生机之气啊，其冰清也甘洌，其暖意也融融，犹如一股股新鲜的乳汁将初春的万物哺育，深深地呼吸一把这初春的仙灵真气吧，感受一下春的活力和节节攀升的生命节奏，那初现的生机正向上张扬。

8.春风温柔地将我揽入怀中，霎时，我仿佛听到了花开的声音，时而清脆、低徊，时而悠扬、高亢，时而空灵、幽静，时而汹涌、雄宏。这声音，如春光般温暖，如春雨般甘甜;这声音，像春雷般震撼，像春潮般烂漫。这声音，似彩虹，赤橙黄绿青蓝紫，有夺人心魄的色彩，演奏着一曲沁人而丰盈的交响。

9.春天，绽放的浓浓深情，写满树梢，袅袅地滋生着香馨。春天奏起缠绵悱恻的音符，让思念无处可藏。是谁将情种深植于梦寐中，是风是雨还是耀眼的星星?是谁把相思镶嵌在春色里，是兰是梅还是撩人的红豆。无数次的回眸，无数次的思吟，春天的情思和你的倩影已根植于我的心灵，永远不会消隐。

10.风中还透着些许微凉，迎春花却禁不住露出笑脸，一丛丛，一簇簇，大片大片的金黄肆意蔓延。河水展现清澈的容颜，清亮的河面上，留着春风划出的层层涟漪。河岸的杨柳绿了，柔软娇嫩，远远望去，是一抹淡淡如烟的绿。桃花开了，杏花红了，海棠绽放了……花肥叶瘦，姹紫嫣红。蜜蜂成群结队的赶来，嗡嗡地闹着，不时有蝴蝶飞来，挥动着美丽的翅膀，翩然起舞。

11.街角的玉兰开了，皎洁如玉的花朵，矗立枝头，如一只只振翅欲飞的白鹭，空气中弥漫着醉人的清香。不知名的野花静静地盛开，掩映在草丛里，生机盎然。燕子衔着春泥在天空里不断盘旋，又匆匆飞过。一时间，人们脱去厚重的棉衣，孩子们兴高采烈地放飞手中五颜六色的风筝，于是，天空喧闹起来。

12.沐浴在春光里，呼吸着清新的空气。享受春光的抚慰，守护着内心的宁静和执著。修炼一份从容豁达，收获一分悠然自得。让蒙尘的双眼清如朝露，让枯寂的思绪灵动如风。于平淡、平常之中，以健康的心态，积极的生活态度，面对人生的诸多苦难，诠释生命的意义，展现生命的精彩。

13.清晨，带着温馨的心事漫步在河畔，不经意间，春天柔嫩的气息湿润了我干涸的视野，我仿佛听到了一种蓬勃的声音萦绕在耳边，像燕莺缠绵，似笙箫悠远，若利箭离弦，如浪蝶翩跹。沉醉其间，春色在梦尖盘旋。

14.群山脱下了素装，换上鲜艳的绿衣，看着已经摆脱冰雪束缚、正在努力奔跑的小溪，听着刚刚回家小鸟的歌唱。小溪叮叮当当的摇着小铃，呼唤着岸边的小生命;小鸟也唧唧喳喳的向大家讲述着南方的故事。但有一句话是谁也忘不掉的，那就是“春天真好!”

15.生机盎然的春天染绿了每个细胞，一只鸟儿站在生命的枝头悄悄地筑巢。一种无法言说的美妙在心头飘绕，一种心照不宣的默契在花间闪耀。春还大地一片绿涛，春给长河一串欢笑，春让鲜花美丽娇娆，春使生命百媚千娇。春的鼓点在耳边缭绕，我知道，这是春姑娘相思的心跳。

16.万物生长，春天给人们带来希望，带来生机，带来遐想。在这个风景如画的季节里，我们播下希望的种子，承载着我们的梦想，在无限的期待中，长成我们心中的希望。让春天的渴望，装满人生的细节，灿烂生命的旅程。

17.相约春天，让思绪与大自然对话，让心声在自然中流淌。把蛰伏已久的许多心里话和那些美丽动人的故事，面对阳光、青山、花草、河流、清风、柔雨一次次打开、一遍遍诉说，它们会百听不厌。和春天作一次约会，雪莲、柳絮、薰衣草、蒲公英、古榕树、木棉花，它们所有的传奇故事和沉浮的日子被一一阅读，在明媚的春色中熠熠发光，舞而不饰，歌而不泪。

18.一片生机怏然的喜庆景象，是春天赋予大地的一片深情“礼物”，“一年之际在于春，一春之际在于勤”。劳累了一年的人们，也该歇下来享受与家人团聚的那份天伦之乐!“春雨倾情滋大地，神蛇赐福壮苍生”。让我们所有的人一起用欢快的步伐来迎接春天美好的祝愿：国泰民安、五谷丰登、风调雨顺、春回大地、鸟语花香……

19.拥抱春天的美丽，捕捉春天的感动。与大自然相约，与春天共舞。与绿色相约，与阳光共舞。感受春天的温馨，感受春天带给我们的喜悦与悸动。打开心灵的画卷，放飞春天的心情，让春天的微笑，在阳光里飞扬。

20.雨后，空气更加清新，夹杂着泥土芬芳的味道，沁人心脾。瓦蓝色的，漂浮着大朵的白云，阳光暖暖地洒下来，透过树枝的间隙，光斑点点。树木显得格外青翠，鸟儿在枝头婉转的歌唱，仿佛唱不尽对春天的憧憬与向往。没有面朝大海，却依然拥有春暖花开。陶醉在这芳菲的季节，体味春天的絮语，心情神采飞扬。

21.在这春天悄然起步的时刻，离那春花烂漫的时节还远，只是天空中漫天飞舞的阳光渐渐灿烂起来，晃人的眼睛，只是树枝间飞去来兮的各类鸟儿多了起来，它们的快乐和呢喃感染着人的情绪。远望苍穹，灿然如洗，多像秋的天域啊，只是这天之蓝，淡淡的、淡淡的，如浅浅的湖水，风平浪静，没有一丝涟漪，没有那多深奥，多像一个新世界在创造着，在等待着，等待着一个缤纷变化的彩画，等待着一个盛装旖旎的春天的盛会。

22.这么快，就几天功夫，冷意还在滞留，雾霭还在徘徊，阳光暖流的回归亦是势不可挡。一个清晨，一只花喜鹊落在屋檐上，一声响亮的喳喳鸣叫，划破寒意似冻的长空，激昂地回响着;几只翩然飞行的小鸟在枝头停下，嘤嘤呢喃着，兴奋地摆动着尾巴;它们仿佛在说：“春天到了，春天到了”。这些大自然中的飞行族类，饱受寒冷和饥饿的压迫，又对环境的温度、光场的变化特别敏感，当然是春天的先知了，它们快乐且快活地报道着早春的消息，且第一批出场享受着这份点点暖意，那份欢欣和喜悦是人们难以理解的。

如何写通顺的英语

英语写作是语言应用的一个重要方面，也是语言能力测定的重要手段，衡量写作水平的标准便是看其是否能用学过的语言材料，语法知识等用文字的形式来表达描述。

书面语言表达一般分为三个过程：思维、组织、表达。先是思维，把要写的东西在脑中思考，这往往是个别的，孤立的一些素材，很凌乱琐碎；因此要对此进行组织，把这些思维作出整理，使其条理、系统化，但这还是较粗糙的，可能还有一些用词不当或语言错误；最后才是表达，把组织过的材料仔细推敲，确无问题了再落笔成文。

在撰写时要注意主谓语一致，时态呼应，用词贴切等，这就是写作。上述的三个过程，最难的就是第三个过程，这需要我们有较好的语法知识，掌握一定数量的句型，习惯用语，熟练的写作技巧，这样才能写出通顺生动的文章来。

总之，要提高英语写作水平，需要两方面的训练：一是语言基础方面的训练，要有扎实的造句、翻译等基本功，即用词法、句法等知识造出正确无误的句子；二是写作知识和能力方面的训练以掌握写作方面的基本方法和技巧。

那么，究竟怎样才能写好作文呢？

阅读优秀范文

首先要搞好阅读。阅读是写作的基础，在阅读方面下的功夫越深，驾驭语言的能力也就越强。所以要写好英语先要读好英语，在语言学习方面狠下苦功，教科书要读透，因为教科书中的文章都是一些很好的范文，文笔流畅，语言规范，精彩的一些课文段落要背诵。再就是要进行大量课外阅读，并记住一些好文章的篇章结构。

加强练词造句训练

其次，要加强练词造句的训练。词句对作文相当于造房的材料，无好材料就造不出好房子。平时在学习阅读时要注意收集积累，把好的词语、短语、句型做好笔记。平时在练习中的错误也要做好记录，再对照正确句子，使地道的英语句子如同条件反射，落笔就对。

了解英语写作格式

还有，要了解英语写作的不同体裁与格式。可以先看一本介绍英语写作入门的书，对英语写作有一个初步的概念，如怎么写议论文，如何提出论据，如何展开，如何确定中心句；又如，英语信的格式，如何根据不同身份写不同结束语等，然后根据不同的体裁进行写作练习。

用英语写日记

要养成记英语日记勤练笔的好习惯。经常用英语记日记，等于天天在练笔，这无疑是提高英语协作的行之有效的好办法。在记日记时，不要总是用简单句，要有意识地用一些好的词组、句型、关联词和复合句等，使文句更优美生动。还有要按照题目或所给情景写文章练笔。写好后对照范文，找出差距，然后再练习，这对提高英语作文也很有帮助，在游泳中学会游泳，只有多练习才能练好。

总之，平时学习语言素材积累多了，体裁格式记住了又经常练习不断提高，到作文下笔时就会得心应手，水到渠成。

万圣节又叫诸圣节，在每年的10月31日，是西方的传统节日。以下是关于万圣节的英语素材，供大家参考。

11月1日万圣节英文：Hallowmas，南瓜是万圣节的代表。

10月31日是万圣夜英文：Halloween，华语地区常将万圣夜称为万圣节。

Halloween is a holiday celebrated on October 31. By tradition, Halloween begins after sunset. Long ago, people believed that witches gathered together and ghosts roamed the world on Halloween. Today, most people no longer believe in ghosts and witches. But these supernatural beings are still a part of Halloween.

万圣节前夜是在10月31日庆祝的一个节日，根据传统，万圣节前夜的庆祝活动从太阳落山开始。在很久以前，人们相信在万圣节前夜女巫会聚集在一起，鬼魂在四处游荡。现在，大多数人们不再相信有鬼魂和女巫的存在了，但是他们仍然把这些作为万圣节前夜的一部分。

The colors black and orange are also a part of Halloween. Black is a symbol for night and orange is the color of pumpkins. A jack-o’-lantern is a hollowed-out pumpkin with a face carved on one side. Candles are usually placed inside, giving the face a spooky glow.

黑色和橙色仍然是万圣节前夜的一部分，黑色是夜晚的象征，而橙色代表着南瓜。南瓜灯是用雕刻成脸型，中间挖空，再插上蜡烛的南瓜做成的，带来一个毛骨悚然的灼热面孔。

Dressing up in costumes is one of the most popular Halloween customs, especially among children. According to tradition, people would dress up in costumes (wear special clothing, masks or disguises) to frighten the spirits away.

盛装是最受欢迎的万圣节风俗之一，尤其是受孩子们的欢迎。按照传统习俗，人们会盛装(穿戴一些特殊的服饰，面具或者装饰)来吓跑鬼魂。

Popular Halloween costumes include vampires (creatures that drink blood), ghosts (spirits of the dead) and werewolves (people that turn into wolves when the moon is full).

流行的万圣节服装包括vampires(吸血鬼)，ghosts(死者的灵魂)和werewolves(每当月圆时就变成狼形的人)。

Trick or Treating is a modern Halloween custom where children go from house to house dressed in costume, asking for treats like candy or toys. If they dont get any treats, they might play a trick (mischief or prank) on the owners of the house.

欺骗或攻击是现代万圣节的风俗。孩子们穿着特殊的衣服走街串巷，讨取糖果和玩具之类的赏赐。如果他们得不到任何的赏赐，就可能会对屋主大搞恶作剧或者胡闹了。

The tradition of the Jack o Lantern comes from a folktale about a man named Jack who tricked the devil and had to wander the Earth with a lantern. The Jack o Lantern is made by placing a candle inside a hollowed-out pumpkin, which is carved to look like a face.

南瓜灯的传统来自于一个民间传说。一个名叫Jack的人戏弄了恶魔，之后就不得不提着一盏灯在地球上流浪。南瓜灯是用雕刻成脸型，中间挖空，再插上蜡烛的南瓜做成的。

There are many other superstitions associated with Halloween. A superstition is an irrational idea, like believing that the number 13 is unlucky!

和万圣节有关的迷信还有很多。迷信是一种不合常理的想法，比如认为13是不吉利的数字!

Halloween is also associated with supernatural creatures like ghosts and vampires. These creatures are not part of the natural world. They dont really exist... or do they?

万圣节还和一些诸如鬼魂和吸血鬼之类的超自然的生物有关。这些生物不是自然界的一部分。他们实际上是不存在的......或许他们其实真的存在?

Witches are popular Halloween characters that are thought to have magical powers. They usually wear pointed hats and fly around on broomsticks.

女巫是万圣节很受欢迎的人物，人们认为她们具有强大的魔力。他们通常戴着尖顶的帽子，骑在扫把上飞来飞去。

Bad omens are also part of Halloween celebrations. A bad omen is something that is believed to bring bad luck, like black cats, spiders or bats.

恶兆也是万圣节庆祝活动的一部分。人们相信恶兆会带给坏运气，黑猫、蜘蛛或者蝙蝠都算是恶兆。

作文考察的是学生综合语文运用能力，有些考生会比较害怕作文，今天就和那些作文比较差的、害怕写作文的同学们分享一个高考作文的小技巧，欢迎阅读。

第1段150字左右：写出中心论点，首选单句形式，且是判断句或肯定句。绝对不用复句(复句容易走题，影响得分)，点出写作的由头，作文题中含有的提示性文字材料，一定要有所涉及。

第2段200字左右：段首讲述分论点一，如第一节的内容是几个分论点的简单组合，则“分论点一”适宜放在段尾。这样和分论点二、分论点三的位置区别开来，使行文有变化。“分论点一”论证不许举例，采用纯分析的说理论据展开。

第3段200字左右：段首讲述分论点二，采用举例论证，首选作文题提示中的例子来分析论证，同时也可辅助一个自己举的例子，自己举的例子要比前例文字少。如没有作文题提示中的例子，则自己举个典型的例子来分析论证，同样要求叙写例子的文字一定要比分析论证的文字少。否则对文体特征会产生重创，影响得分。

第4段200字左右：段首讲述分论点三。采用联系实际举例。这是写作本文的时代意义所在。联系的实际可以是学习、生活、社会任何一个方面，目的是或提高思想认识，或明确是非正邪，或提出解决的方法途径，或揭示某种疑难迷惑，总之要给人以启发。

第5段150字左右：要再现中心论点，扣住中心论点写出作用、意义、号召、展望等。

英语写作和汉语写作一样，要写出好文章除了要有好的内容外还少不了好的结构，而句子的好坏又取决于选词造句。小编收集了关于英语作文的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

一、措辞

1、选择生动准确的词

词是语言的基本单位，人们要表达思想，就要选择适当的词语，这是写作的基本要求。

词可分为一般概念的词(general words)和具体概念的词(specific words)。表示一般概念的词含义模糊;表示具体概念的词含义明确，表达准确，生动形象。写作时合理地使用具体概念的词能够使句子表达的意思准确，内容生动，更富有感染力。试比较下面各组句子：

(l) A few houses were destroyed yesterday (general)

Five houses burnt down yesterday (specific)

(2)His relatives gave him two gifts(general)

His aunt and uncle gave hima watch and a Pen as the birthday gifts。(specific)

(3) Jack went to the window and looked at the crowd outside(general)

Jack tiptoed to the window and peeped into the room(specific)

上面各组句中，第一个句子抽象概括，给人以空泛的感觉：第二个句子用词具体，有个件，使人感到意思确切，生动逼真。

2、使用英语成语和习语

人们在长期使用语言的过程中，积累了大量的习惯表达法。这些成语、习语内涵丰富，语言生动活泼。文章中适当地使用这类短语，可避免语言的单调贫乏，使句子生动而富于内涵。如：

(l)George has lost his social position since his business failed.

可改为：George has come down in the world since his business failed

(2).Maybe you have time to go to the cinema,but I have more importavt businessto attend to.

可改为：Maybe you have time to go to the cinema,but I have other fish to fry.

3、用词的宽度

用词的宽度可以反映出写作者所掌握的词汇量。如果一个人掌握的词汇量大，那么当表达同一概念有不同的表达方法时，则可以换一种说法。如：

The teachers maintained that the students should give up love for the sake ofleaming Students,however,hold that fordidding love among college students is nogood.

这两句话里，谓语分别用了maintain和hold。如果将它们换为think，所表达的意思相同，但用词宽度则不如原文。这两句话中for the sake of，give uP,is no good等都是用词宽度的表现。

所以在英语写作中有意识地适当增加用词宽度既能体现学以致用的原则又能使文章取得良好效果。

二、句子的多样化

英语中，同一思想用不同句式表达，其效果会大不相同。要想写出好的文章，就要不断地变化句子的结构形式。

l、长短句交替使用

句子的长短是为表达思想服务的。英语短句结构简单，意思明白具有生动活泼而又干脆利索的表达效果，而长句结构复杂，信息丰富，能表达成熟的思想与复杂的概念。一味地使用长句或短句会使文章显得单调，乏味，从而影响文章的总体效果。科学地交替使用长短句使句子结构变化多样，不仅给文章带来顿挫起伏的语言美感，而且可以受到理想的修辞效果。请看下面的这段话：

She returned to her office.There was a note under the door. It was from Mr May.He said he was waiting for her in the coffee room.And he bad not found her sister.Hewas sorry to have missed her.

这段话用了一连串的短句，读起来单调呆板，平淡无味。为使文字更加生动，意思更加明确可改为：

When she returned to her office，the found a note from Mr May under the door.He said he was waiting for her in the coffee room and hadnt found her sister yet.Headded that he was sorry to have missed her.

修改后三个句子长短不一，读起来就给人以不同的感觉。

又如《大学英语》第一册第十课 Going Home，当汽车驶至 Brunsnick，车上的年轻人看见黄手帕时，出现了以下这两行文字：

Then，suddenly，all of the young people were up out of thelr seats，screamlng andshouting and cryin, doing small dances of joy.All except Vlngo.这两句话一长(23个词)一短(3个词)，彼此衬托互为凸现。第一句的两个and和四个-ing词，把热闹、喧哗的气氛喧染极至，长句之后，蜂回路转，一个仅三个词的短句扑入读者的双目几乎沸腾的场面顿时凝固但其余音未绝，此时外表虽冷漠，内心却炙热难当。

2、句子开头的多样化

“主-谓-宾”、“主-系-表”是英语的基本句型，主语领先句也是用得最多的句型。写作中为避免形式单一，当句子可以用主语开头，同时又可以其它结构开头时，不妨变换一下。如：

(1)Defeated in the minor exchanges,I now play my queen of trumps.(分词短语做状语开头)

(2)There are two ways in which one can own a book.( there be句型开头)

(3)Equally important is a good habit of reading(表语开头)

以上各句都可以用主语开句，但在篇章中通过改变句子开头，文章就会疏落有致，语言形式丰富多采。

3、句子结构的多样化

写作中可以通过句型结构的变化来增添文采，强化表现力。如：

(l) The love of the liberty is the love of the others;the love of power ls thelove of ourselves.

(平行结构.这类结构整齐、紧凑;句子生动、鲜明，语义贯通、语势强劲有力。)

(2)The days when we suffered from oppression and exploitation are gone.(这样表达文字通顺，但语意不很突出。)

改为：Gone are the days when we suffered fron oppression andexploitation.

(采用倒装句结构后，充分体现出受剥削受压迫的人民解放后扬眉吐气的心情。)

三、观点切题结构合理

这是写作中最重要的要求之一它要求写作开门见山直入主题。如写一篇谈“健康重要性”的文章，提示是1、健康的重要性;2、保持健康的方法;3、我的看法。按要求文章应按三个自然段来写，而每段开头都必须是提示的内容，因此，三段可以这么开头：

l.Good health is important to everyone of us.

2.There are many ways which can help build up our health.

3.As for me，I like running as well as playing basketball and football.

除了开门见山以外，论述的内容必须与提示保持一致，否则文章的语言再好，也只能算是失败之作。一般来说，这类文章的每个自然段都由三部分组成，即主题句，论述句和结论句。主题句由提示给出，论述句提供观点来论证主题句，结论句则是总结、归纳、概括主提句的观点。

总之，要写出一篇好的英语作文不是一朝一夕就能做到的。除了借助以上方法之外，还需从平时入手，勤写多练，以提高自己的写作水平和语言表达能力。

To my hometown, where is not wide, fame is not too big, but in my heart, it is better than any other big cities, because of the change of the home is too big, it become more and more beautiful, more become more lovely.

Considerable hometown scenery also more and more, such as huang taishan parks. Was a barren loess slope, the mountain of trees, let a person see the very boring. And now, has become a beautiful scenic spot, with hills, have small trees, flower beds, grassland, water... All the year round, the distinctive beauty. Artificial lake, the original is a river, the river used to shampoo in the rainy season, flooded farmland, villages. Downstream of the upstream reservoir, lake water, into the lake big lakes, this is no disaster. There, you can swim, can fishing, billow above during the day, night glittering and moving, is really fascinating.

Farther away, said the Aries valley. Here the mountain is the Great Wall, mountain spring water, the scenery pleasant. If you want to climb the Great Wall, you may wish to try first to Aries valley, you dont look down upon it, is also very high, it is not easy to climb. Want to play water, also can to the Aries valley, theres a big spring river, on the surface of the boat to catch ducks, havent seen it, very interesting. From sheep head spring water, pure natural, very clean.

In recent years, home building cover higher and higher, the width of the flat road, and even rural road hardening, became the real new rural ecological civilization. You are a genuine, locals out three to five years, also afraid of couldnt find the way home.

Home store my happy time, left a deep impression on me. Hometown of beautiful scenery bring us joy. Every time I want to home, I just cant help but think of my childhood in my hometown of happy days. Such a beautiful home, dont make me to love it?

I forgot to tell you, my hometown is - qianan region, had the opportunity to shoot, must it will make you linger!

要说我的家乡，地方不算广，名气也不太大，但在我心中，它比任何大城市都好，因为家乡的变化太大了，它越变越美，越变越可爱。

家乡的可观风景也越来越多了，比如黄台山公园。原来就是一片荒芜的黄土坡，山上的树也不多，让人看了很枯燥。而现在，已变成美丽的风景区，有小山，有小树林，有花坛，有草地，有湖水……一年四季都各具特色，美丽无比。人工湖，原来也只是一条河，这河以前经常在雨季发水，淹没农田、村庄。经上游修水库，下游修湖蓄水，变成了西湖似的大湖泊，从此没有灾害了。在那，可以游泳，可以垂钓，白天水光潋滟，晚上波光动人，真是令人陶醉。

再往远一点说，白羊峪。这里山上有长城，山下有泉水，风景宜人。如果你想爬长城，你不妨先去白羊峪试试，你可别小看它，也很高的，爬上去不容易哦。想玩水的话，也可来白羊峪，这里有一条大泉水河，在水面上划船赶鸭子，没看过吧，很有趣呢。还可以从羊头里接泉水，纯天然，很干净的。

几年来，家乡的楼房越盖越高，道路越修越宽越平，就连农村也搞道路硬化，成了真正的文明生态新农村。你就是一个地地道道的本地人，出门在外三五年，回家也怕找不到路。

家乡存储了我快乐的时光，给我留下了深刻的印象。家乡的美丽风景给我们带来欢乐。每次想的家乡，我就不禁想起童年在家乡过的快乐时光。这样美丽的家乡，难道不使我去爱它吗?

忘了告诉你了，我的家乡是——迁安，有机会一定要来呦，它会让你流连忘返的!