《红字》小说的英文读后感两篇 作文怎么写【实用20篇】

苏联著名作家高尔基曾说过：“书是人类进步的阶梯。”书在我们的生活中必不可少，多读书，才能获得更多的知识，寒假里，我利用空余时间读了“中国四大名著”之一的《水浒传》。

《水浒传》是作者施耐庵根据北宋农民起义而写成的一部伟大的长篇小说。小说倾向鲜明地描写了当时不同阶层的人民群众反抗压迫的斗争。概括了当时不同阶层的人们从觉醒到反抗的斗争道路。

这本书的每一篇故事都写的非常深动。里面有《九纹龙大闹史家村》、《醉打蒋门神》《卢俊义活捉史文恭》、还有最惨烈的攻打方腊那一战。这些故事塑造了众多英雄人物形象，其中有性格刚烈的武松，武艺高强，逆来顺受的林冲，机智果断的吴用，结交广义的宋江，都给我留下了深刻的印象。

读完了这本书，我的心还留在那些水浒英雄与方腊在战场撕杀的那种震憾情景里久久回味。“路见不平一声吼，该出手时就出手……”这是水浒的主题歌，唱的多么豪迈，有力，现在的社会虽然不像以前那样受压迫，但还是有一些不法分子做坏事，我们要像水泊梁山好汉一样，与恶势力做斗争，让我们的国家更加和平，强大。

读了这本书，最让我印象深刻的是第一章里的他们乘热气球，要逃离南方军队，回到自己的国家。于是他们偷偷组成了一个团队，然后也偷偷乘上南方军队制造的热气球，但是他们很不幸，在过程中，遇上了大风暴，不知道是什么东西把他们的热气球给弄破了，然后他们不惜一切代价把热气球上的所有东西统统都扔了，因为这样，热气球才上升了两千英里，但是因为还是在下降，所以他们不得不做了一个既大胆又勇敢的决定，全队人抓住网索，把吊篮给扔下去，然后着路在下面那个荒岛上，之后开始了一段新的旅程。

在读过《神秘岛》之后，我决定要像他们那样在那样高的空中，勇敢地去任何决定，哪怕只有一丝希望也要勇于去尝试，要迎难而上，迎刃而解。

以前的我，一碰到难题都是知难而退。有一次跑步，我听说要跑四百米，吓的腿都发软了，可是我想到在《神秘岛》里的人们，是怎样克服困难的，之后我就学他们一样，坚持跑完了这个四百米。还有一次，我在上海的游乐园准备玩过山车，我的心情和书中的主角全然不同，她的心情是兴奋，迫不及待地想长一双翅膀飞到过山车上去。然而，我的心情是被吓得魂飞魄散，恨不得把过山车和轨道全折了。但是，最后我像《神秘岛》的人们一样鼓励自己，勇敢地乘坐了极地过山车。《神秘岛》让我变得更勇往直前了！

最近我读了一本十分好看的书——《呼兰河传》，它的作者是萧红。

这本书中作者的童年是快乐的，也是寂寞的。呼兰河并不繁华，就只有春夏秋冬这样来回走着。在这里，到处可见由于人们的无知发生的一场又一场的灾难，人们只为活而活，为了死而死。接二连三的悲剧，让我也无法判断谁对谁错了。

萧红给我们带来了童年的快乐，让我们一起走进了她的世界。让我们体会了生活，让我们了解了生命。在这，我也想起了我五彩缤纷的童年，我一想起它，我便会会心一笑······那是一个大夏天，我正在空调房里玩游戏，我突发奇想:这么舒服的地方，我干嘛不去“偷”点糖化糖水喝呢?说干就干，于是我拿起杯子，蹑手蹑脚地走到厨房，将杯子倒满水，心想:嘻嘻，他们都没发现我，现在偷糖可是最佳时机。我用小手捂着嘴巴，傻笑了两声，可开心没多久，问题就来了：两个瓶子里都是白色物体!哪个是糖呢?我拍了拍脑袋，自言自语地说道：“妈妈怕不够，一定多买了一瓶，这么说来就有两瓶糖!”我正在自作聪明的时候，我看见两个瓶子上有不同的两个字，这下我纳闷了，心想:怎么会!难道不是两瓶都是?哎，这下我的聪明才智该发挥出来了。我在那念着什么乱七八糟的东西，突然，我好像知道了什么，便拿起勺子，舀了一大勺“糖”放进水里。我还开心的一跳，以为自己拿到了糖，可傻傻的我却不知那是盐。回到房间，我用手搅了一下，便一口气喝完了。不一会儿，我的脸色突然变暗了，连忙找水喝。哈哈，不认字的我实在太可爱了。每个人都有自己的童年，推荐大家读读《呼兰河传》这一本近代小说，它能带着你回到童年。

这个寒假我读了一本书，名叫：《平凡的世界》。

这是一部全景式地表现中国当代城乡社会生活的长篇小说。全书共三部。作者在近十年问广阔背景上，通过复杂的矛盾纠葛，刻划了社会各阶层众多普通人的形象。劳动与爱情，挫折与追求，痛苦与欢乐，日常生活与巨大社会冲突，纷繁地交织在一起，深刻地展示了普通人在大时代历史进程中所走过的艰难曲折的道路。

在这平凡的世界中，平凡人的一生，更要有坚定的理想和信念，有执着的追求和渴望，战胜困难，摆脱束缚，让人们对美好生活的向往，如何的体会生活中间的亲情、友情、爱情，学会生活，懂得珍惜，对于我们这一代人，也是一种警醒。

里面很多的描写，很写实，里面有作者的思考。

就举一个例子：

第三十六章：

“大门被省委书记的权利强行打开了，工人们欢呼着拥进车间。李达康站在沙瑞金身边看着，为省委书记的大义凛然鼓掌，心里却想，其实沙瑞金应该让光明区法院来撕封条，而不应该用手上的权利强撕，要依法行政嘛。可嘴上却说，沙书记，您眼里容不得沙子啊”

照理来说，大快人心的事情，还计较这些干什么，但是正是由于这些思考，才让人尊敬上这本书。

电视剧拍的更好，很多细节，老戏骨演的太有味道， 让人欲罢不能，等不及电视剧了，先把书看完了。

《红楼梦》之前是看文字，这次是听书，前80回是企鹅有声，讲的声情并茂，能引人入盛，听久了，她的口音变化都能知道是谁在说话，后40回没更新，便听了语音朗读，这就真是机械式阅读了，没有感情，所有文字都在一个调上，所以，除了声音受影响，文字也说是高鹗所写，没前80回精彩有深度，总体来讲，此书讲的是一个世道一个家族的盛衰历程，人情小说，依感情和才气为背景描诉各类人的性情世故，宝玉黛玉是冥冥中的注定，心有灵犀的一对情人，终不能成眷属缘于黛玉体弱多病，即使才情，但在大家族的环境里，别说古代，世代也是不允许有这样的媳妇，起码对繁衍后代和兴旺后族不会有好的影响，因此被上辈人拒之，这便是他们的悲剧之源。

佩服贾母对几代人传承起了好的带头作用，因之总被称为老祖宗，王熙凤精致漂亮，奈何书读太少，欠胸怀，心狠手辣。个人喜乐宝钗和探春，有女子的才气和胸襟。府里的丫鬟袭人、晴文、鸳鸯、紫娟等也有她们独特的个性魅力，讨人喜欢，整部书里以女人为主，男人也就贾政算是正面又正派的一个人了。历史书历史故事，又何尝不是现世的重复？多读多品多思，总会有数不尽的收获。

《雾都孤儿》揭露许多当时的社会问题，如救济院、童工、以及帮派吸收青少年参与犯罪等。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing theirkindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell thosevermin-to-beto learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

三国演义这部书的人物形象性格显露无遗、活灵活现，也说明了我们每一个人的性格好坏都不能隐埋，所以我们要改掉缺点，每件事做的更好“大江东去，浪淘尽、千古风流人物，故垒西边，人道是、三国周郎赤壁……”这首词写的是就是三国时期的事情。

三国演义主要讲了五个时段：黄巾起义、董卓掌权、群雄争割、三分天下、三国归晋。黄巾起义始于巨鹿人张角，因为看不惯朝败，因此发动黄巾起义。而刘、关、张就此桃园结义，为朝廷效力。不久就灭了黄巾军。刘备的力也一天天强起来。皇后的哥哥何进因为误信他人召了早有造反意思的董卓进京。结果何进被十常侍杀后，董卓就掌权了。曹操曾想杀害董卓，但不成功。董卓为拉拢人心，封袁绍为勃海太守，出让了赤兔驹给吕布。逼得诸侯联军抗董，虽败军了，但最后也给吕布所杀。张飞、关羽、刘备三顾茅庐后，请出隐居山林诸葛孔明。诸葛亮提出了联吴抗曹等计划，使刘备的大业扎下了结实的基础。经过官渡之战、赤壁之战，曹操灭了袁绍、吕布，吴、蜀也打退了曹操。曹操、刘备、孙权各据一方，曹操占据强大的北方，刘备占据西蜀、荆州等，孙权占据江东。从而崛起吴、魏、蜀，三分天下。最后，曹操、刘备、孙权、诸葛亮等逐渐去世。蜀、吴都归降魏主司马炎，三国一统归西晋。这本书刻画了许多栩栩如生的人物：神机妙算的诸葛亮，威风凛凛的关羽，冲动鲁莽的张飞，昏庸无能的刘禅，谨慎多疑的曹操。

其中我最喜欢神机妙算的诸葛亮!因为他上知天文，下知地理，为刘备出谋划策，建功立业，使他独据一方，不愧为“卧龙”。可惜与诸葛亮平等的“凤雏”庞统不幸遇难落凤坡。

《三国演义》里的《三顾茅庐》最令我记忆深刻。在这个故事中，我学会了一个道理：一个人只要想学做一件事，就不要怕遇到挫折，要三顾茅庐，只要用你的真诚打动对方，就一定能行。还有一个故事：在刘备起兵七十万水陆并进攻吴为关羽报仇时，张飞冲动鞭打两个部将，在晚上两个怀恨在心的部将因一怒之下杀死了酒醉未醒的张飞，一代虎将死于非命。也告诫了我不要鲁莽行事，意气用事，否则后果不堪设想。

这是我读三国演义后的感想。

《三国演义》通过描写了东汉末年魏·蜀·吴三国的争霸之事，体现了天下大势久分必合，合久必分的真理。

《三国演义》成功地塑造了许多个性鲜明的人物。每一个人物都具有不同的性格,作者刻画得淋漓尽致,细细品味,让读者仿佛进入了一种境界。

先说关羽。这是给我留下印象最深的人物之一。他降汉不降曹、秉烛达旦、千里走单骑、五关斩六将、古城斩蔡阳，后来又在华容道义释曹操。他忠于故主，因战败降敌而约好一知故主消息，便不知千里万里往投。我认为虽降了敌，但最后还是回来了，不但仍算忠，而且还要算一种难得可贵的忠。可以说关羽是义的诠释。

那么，诸葛亮就是智的化身。虽然他没有成功扭转三国归晋的结局，但他成功改变了三国。

从这些人物和国家我们不难看出人的性格的重要性。性格关系着成功。每个人都有自己的目标，只要踏踏实实，仔仔细细地走好追求成功过程中的每一段路，相信成功一定会不远的。当我们羡慕地看着别人成功时，往往忽略了他在成功的道路上付出的艰辛。

其实没有最后的胜者，也没有失败者。司马炎不是，曹操也不是，刘备孙权也不是失败者。他们都在自己的舞台上，绽放出他们最绚丽的光彩。

总的来说，读过这本书之后我大开眼界，而以上几人也给了我很深的感受，他们很值得我学习。“话说天下大势，分久必合，合久必分……”耳边仿佛又传来了这句富有哲理的话，使我心中久久不能平静。让我们用心去读《三国》，品《三国》，道《三国》，用心去感受三国的史诗，感受它的悲壮之美!

《平凡的世界》之所以是一本好书，因为他的人物以及情节都刻画的很真实。直让人仿佛置身于那个时代，体验着那个时代的风风雨雨。看后让人很受启发，回味无穷。是以朴实的语言与真实的感受来见证平凡生活中的平凡的信仰与人生。浮躁的年代，浑噩的社会像一杯沉垢的清水尽管澄清，但不平静。路遥笔下的人物却是那么个性鲜明，书中的少安、少平，还有其他人都是那个时代的象征也必受时代的局限，但也正因此才真实亲近，栩栩如生。

首先，我很喜欢路遥的出发点：平凡的世界。他的世界是平凡的，这只是黄土高原上几千几万座村落中的一座。从小处着眼，作者刻画出一个个普通人物平凡的人生旅程，衬托日新月异的时代变迁，反映人们的思想，给人以亲近，给人以启迪。但路遥却在平凡中看到了他的主人公的不平凡。比如说孙少平，我认为孙少平这个人物是全篇文字的主线，通过他的成长和成熟的经历，展现给大家面前的是那个时代整整一代人对生活的憧憬与无奈。

他受过了高中教育，他经过自学达到可与大学生进行思想探讨的程度。战胜困难，摆脱束缚，让人们对美好生活的向往，如何的体会生活中间的亲情、友情、爱情，学会生活，懂得珍惜，对于我们这一代人，也是一种警醒。在路遥的世界中出现的都是平凡的人物，正是在这些平凡的人物里他描写着人性中的善与美，丑与恶。在他的世界里，人的的优点就是认识到自己是平凡的。这点从孙少平身上得到最突出的体现。他认识到了平凡，也选择了平凡。

平凡的人生，从平凡中而来地繁衍生息，你能看到的，就是苦难中的信心，不能夺走的盼望，永不止息的爱，平凡中的苦涩，以及今生的骄傲。

One of the most interesting questions about Gullivers Travels is whether the Houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of Swifts satire. In other words, in Book IV, is Swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? If we look closely at the way that the Houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact Swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

First we have to see that Swift does not even take Gullver seriously. For instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. Also, when he first sees the Yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. He says, "I must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. This is why Swift refers to Erasmus Darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the Beagle-to show how Gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. But if Lemule Gulliver is satirized, so are the Houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. They walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. As Gulliver says, "It was with the utmost astonishment that I witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a Vienese waltz. To my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the Lord Edmund Burke" . As this quote demonstrates, Gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the Houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. For instance, the leader of the Houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of Charles Dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the Kings and Queens of England up to George II. Swift subtly shows that this Houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of Queen Elizabeths husband.

Swifts satire of the Houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. One of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that Guenivre has brought with him to the island. First she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. But when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "As I watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than Mr. Pope being fitted by a clothier. She dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. My horse sniffed the creature and turned away." It might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. But it makes more sense if we see that Swift is being satiric here: it is the female Houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century England. The Houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress Gullivers horse. Gulliver imagines the horse saying, Sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held Mr. Pope on her back makes me queezy .

A final indication that the Houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the Houynhms visits Lilliput, where he visits the French Royal Society. He goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at Gallilee). The scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the Houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "The creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. Slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

《简爱》是一部具有非常浓厚浪漫主义政治色彩的长篇小说。

小说女主人公简爱出身贫寒，长相平庸，但有着非常不凡的气质和丰富的感情生活体验学习能力，她始终追求着职业道德的完善和个人的独立，追求自由平等发展基础上的爱情对于婚姻。而男主人公罗切斯特是一个女性主义世界经济幻想中的形象，他强悍而温柔，暴烈而睿智，在充满风险等级管理观念的社会中，他主动地进行寻求与简爱可以达到一种精神上的高度契合。简爱在我们个人信息情感与世俗教育观念的冲突中执著地追求学生自己没有理想中的爱情，她的反抗，她的自尊，她的纯真，带给千千万万读者以持久的美感。

自幼学习失去很多父母的孤女简爱从小学生受到我国收养她的舅母即其子女的歧视和虐待，最后被送进了带有这个孤儿院相关性质的洛伍德教会我们学校。在那里，饥饿、体罚、疾病和呆板的宗教文化教育使简爱在肉体和精神上的积雪产品受到严重摧残。长大后，简爱为了企业追求经济独立和自己的生活，来到了桑菲尔德庄园作家庭作为教师。她与其他庄园的课堂主人罗切斯特深深相爱，正当她沉浸在这种爱情的甜蜜中，与罗切斯特步入大学殿堂时，却发现罗切斯特仍有需要一个就是活着的疯妻。为了实现平等的爱情简爱毅然选择出去，乞讨、流浪，几经发展坎坷，成为其中一名大学生乡村小学教师。她拒绝了牧师表兄那桎梏社会人性的“爱情”，回到了被大火烧成废墟的桑菲尔德庄园，回到了她深爱的，已双目失明的罗切斯特的身边，找回了属于自己没有真正进行平等的幸福。

简爱经历了许多困难，终于得到了幸福。

文章的跌宕起伏，色彩鲜艳，使读者在阅读的精神世界和想象中得到了极大的丰富和满足。

《简爱》是一部自传体小说，虽然故事是虚构的，但是女主人公和许多其他人物的生活、环境，甚至许多生活细节，都是取材于作者和他周围人的真实经历。从中我们可以学到：

人，不管遇到多大的困难和挫折，我们都不会轻易放弃，而是努力克服困难，那么我们就会得到一个美好的世界。

这个周末，我读完了一部少年长篇小说——《草房子》。这本书写了男孩桑桑终生难忘的六年小学生活。

六年中，桑桑遇到了许多看似寻常却又撼动人心的故事：秃头男孩坚守尊严；少男少女毫无瑕疵的纯情；坚强少年与命运相拼的悲怆；孤独老人对儿童的喜爱；桑桑得的怪病，使他在死亡体验中对生命的深切领悟……

其中令我最感动的是桑桑。坚定不移的希望经历一阵阵风雨的磨难后，终于现出了一道绚丽的彩虹，驱散了死神的威胁。桑桑比以往任何时候都显得刚强。我十分钦佩他这种常人难以拥有的意志。

我不禁想起了自己：每当考了一个不理想的成绩，我都会灰心，自暴自弃，一点都没有信心；每当我走在夜晚的街道上，任何一点风吹草动都令我胆战心惊；每当遇到困难，我也很难勇敢面对……看着书中的桑桑，我很佩服，也很惭愧。

我也学到了这本书中的写作特色——反衬。作者以反衬的方式写出了一个个如莲花般的好少年——出淤泥而不染。书中的陆鹤——一个秃头男孩就是最好的例子。陆鹤从小就饱受人们无缘无故的嘲笑和歧视，可他却能乐观地面对上帝对他的考验。果然，“天生我材必有用”，在一次重要的戏剧比赛中，必不可少的主角竟也是个秃子。当他成功的为一个学校、为一整片油麻地小镇争光时，人们才发现，即使是个秃子也可以使自己的头发光、发亮；可以使自己人生的舞台绚丽多彩……

读完这本书我受益匪浅。书中的故事像放电影一样一幕幕在我眼前闪现，主人公的高贵品质像颗颗闪亮的星星照耀着我前进！

我一向对动物的兴趣不减，永远！

一听说《狼图腾小狼小狼》这本书出版我便苦苦哀求妈妈给我买一本。妈妈经不住我的苦苦哀求便带我去书店，一进书店，凭我“泡”书店的本领：对书摆放的位置了如指掌，我一晃就没了影。不一会我大喊：“妈妈，在这里。”我顿时便呆住了封面上的图画栩栩如生；书内精美的图画；大大的，饱满的字。令我吃惊，一看我便深深地被吸引住了。

我满怀欣喜地抱着书走回家，一打开我便被小狼的形象深深地吸引住了。主人公陈阵与小狼之间的亲情与友情带给我心灵强烈的震撼和感动。

看着看着我的心不自觉出现这样一段话：这本书一系列很心酸很痛心的故事，读来让人扼腕叹息，结局使我潸然泪下。自古以来，狼一直扮演着一个凶恶狡诈的角色，什么狼狈为奸、狼心狗肺，好像只有狼这个字眼才能更好的诠释“坏”的含义。而《狼图腾小狼小狼》却不一样，它没有通过人们长期形成的.偏见来看待狼，而是描绘了一个独有魅力，一个虽聪明但不狡猾，一个神奇让人惊叹的草原精灵。

它们的精神值得我好好的去学习，这使我想到书中的一段话：牧民们把羊圈用石头盖得很高也很结实，人翻不过去，他们认为狼也翻不过去，于是牧民们都安心睡觉去了。可没想到第二天早上一看，羊死了一大片，血滩了有二指厚。他们仔细察看了羊圈才发现，原来是昨天晚上有一群狼在狼王的带领下袭击了羊圈。有头最大的狼在墙外站起来，后爪蹬地，前爪撑墙，用自己的身子给狼群当跳板。然后，让一条饿狼从几十米以外的方向冲过来，蹬上大狼的背，就“飞”到了羊圈里。等这只狼吃饱了以后就会再当跳板，把里面吃饱了的狼再送出来。最后一只吃完的狼，它硬是叼来死羊一只只都摞起来，搭成羊梯。“噌”的一声也就顺利“飞”走了。看到这里我不禁敬佩起狼的团结精神，心想：这不正是我们需要的精神吗？

我不自觉的想到我们的拔河比赛：拔河比赛的哨声吹响了，我们全力以赴想让中间的绳索到我们这边来，可它却不听话的向着那边去了。结果可想而知——我们输了。可我们并不团结，去寻找输的理由，反而你怪我，我怪你的，把我们的团结都扔了！我们不正需要狼的团结精神吗？

看完这些我不由的认为狼的智慧与才能、狡猾、很有团体精神。狼的自由自立，狼的强悍卓越……都是无人能及的！

我读过了原著小说，书中其实是明里暗里设了这么几对矛盾对手来展开的。

一个是侯亮平和同校同系学长祁同伟之间的暗战。祁同伟是一个贫苦出身的官员，为了升官发财，热衷权钱交易，翻云覆雨，心狠手辣，是这部小说中最强的反派，他代表着那种一人得道鸡犬升天的官员，搞特殊化、小圈子、利益链等，他视人民为对立面。

一个是沙瑞金和高育良之间的空降干部与本土政治势力的角逐。高育良是典型的学院派干部吗，理论知识丰富，引经据典，擅长诡辩，是那种笑面虎和深藏不露的政客，他可能不屑金钱和美色，却重派系，搞平衡，旁敲侧击，滴水不漏的打击政治对手。唯上不唯实。他的腐败是那种“雅腐”，是善于玩弄权术的大老虎，他视人民为理论武器。

还有一个是陈岩石和赵立春之间的老革命和大老虎之间的对立。陈老是革命理想主义者，为了党和人民，可牺牲，同样，也可以和贪官作斗争，他可以说是一种化身，痛心疾首腐败给党和国家、人民带来的危害，又亲力亲为的坚持反腐，天不怕地不怕，正是这样的人，带给人民一种期望和希望。而赵立春，便是那种被权力腐化的最严重的干部，他的作风让整个汉东省的政治生态腐烂不已，官商勾结、派系对立、懒政成风。他视人民为上升的阶梯。

在这三组较量之外，更是描画了一种另类的干部：京州市市委书记李达康，这种强势干部政绩斐然、能力突出，是不可多得实干型干部，同时又是反腐意识薄弱的干部，只重视经济发展，不重视组织建设，以致于让身边的下属成为腐败的常客和懒政的温床。

可谓是现代版的官场现形记。

最近，我读了俄罗斯著名作家高尔基所写的《童年》，这本书中形象地描绘了主人公阿廖沙悲惨的童年。

阿廖沙的父母双亡，而外祖父的脾气十分火爆，只有外祖母疼爱、关心他。外祖父不喜欢他，有时还要毒打他。他的两个舅舅也讨厌他、为难他。其实主人公阿廖沙的原型就是这本书的作者高尔基，高尔基借阿廖沙来描写自己的童年。这使我深刻地体会到了高尔基的童年和我们比起来实在太惨了!

再看看我们，被父母宠爱着。每天坐在宽敞明亮的教室中，听老师讲课;回家也有美味等着我们品尝;想要什么，只要父母能做到的，都会尽量满足;如果被欺负，大人们还会狠狠教训那个人。而高尔基生活的那个年代呢?高尔基的生活从不平静，几乎天天都有人辱骂、伤害、欺负他，而亲人对他也不管不问，甚至还刁难他、毒打他，他也只能默默地忍受，坚强地面对。

高尔基童年的艰苦生活，使他变得坚强。他奋发图强，最终成为一名伟人。他的坚强不屈，敢于面对困难并克服困难的精神是值得我们学习的!

one of the most interesting questions about gullivers travels is whether the houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of swifts satire. in other words, in book iv, is swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? if we look closely at the way that the houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

first we have to see that swift does not even take gullver seriously. for instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. also, when he first sees the yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. he says, "i must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. this is why swift refers to erasmus darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the beagle-to show how gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. but if lemule gulliver is satirized, so are the houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. they walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. as gulliver says, "it was with the utmost astonishment that i witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a vienese waltz. to my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the lord edmund burke" . as this quote demonstrates, gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. for instance, the leader of the houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of charles dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the kings and queens of england up to george ii. swift subtly shows that this houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of queen elizabeths husband.

swifts satire of the houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. one of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that guenivre has brought with him to the island. first she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. but when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "as i watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than mr. pope being fitted by a clothier. she dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. my horse sniffed the creature and turned away." it might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. but it makes more sense if we see that swift is being satiric here: it is the female houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century england. the houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress gullivers horse. gulliver imagines the horse saying, sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held mr. pope on her back makes me queezy .

a final indication that the houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the houynhms visits lilliput, where he visits the french royal society. he goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at gallilee). the scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "the creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

he has accomplished the scientists goal, but the scientist is not happy, for his livelihood has now been destroyed. swifts clear implication is that even though the houyhnhmns are smart, they do not know how to use that knowledge for the benefit of society, only for their own prideful agrandizement.

throughout gullivers travels, the houyhnhms are shown to be an ideal gone wrong. though their intent might have been good, they dont know how to do what they want to do because they are filled with pride. they mislead gulliver and they even mislead themselves. the satire on them is particularly well explained by the new born houyhnhm who, having just been born, exclaims, "with this sort of entrance, what must i expect from the rest of my life!" .

《麦琪的礼物》讲述了一对穷困的年轻夫妇忍痛割爱互赠圣诞礼物的故事，反映了美国下层人民生活的艰难，赞美了主人公善良的心地和纯真爱情。下面是语文迷网为大家提供的英语读后感范文，供大家参考。

Its a short story by O.Henry that has moved me for a long time.Maybe most of you are familar with its name,that is,The Gift of the Magi.I have read it many times but every time I like to read it slowly and deliberately.I think "The Gift of the Magi"

is meant to be savored.

Maybe there is no necessity for me to repeat the main idea of the story.But Im

so fascinated with the short story that I want to retell it yo you,and to myself.

It happened to a very poor but blissful young couple named Jim and Della in the end of 18th century in England.Because of the maladies of that society and the effect of economic crisis,they worked hard but earned little.Life is very hard for them.Despite of this,their love to each other and the enthusiasm for life didnt changed at all.When Chrismas day was approuching ,Della used the money she got from selling her beautiful hair which she treasured very much to give Jim a fob for his grandfathers pocket watch.But Jim had already sold that watch to buy Della tortoiseshell combs to wear in her long hair,not knowing shed cut it off.

It appears that the gifts they gave each other have been useless.But I think they gave each other the best of what they had to make the other happy.Isnt that true love?We can image,in such rough conditions,as it said in the story,"Life is made up of sobs,sniffles,and smiles,with sniffles predominating."Itst absolute reasonable for them to be beaten by the misery.But the fact is that no matter how tough life had been,they wouldt lose heart.With strong faith and their love ,they did their best to make the other pleased."Whennever Mr.James came home and reached his flat ,above he was called Jimand greatly hugged by Mrs.James."Maybe this account is the best description of their love and struggle against hard life.It was said that the povertier life is ,the firmer and truer love is."Actually,theyd given the very best they had out of love.

"They are too foolish children in a flat,who most unwisely sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house.But in a last word,to the wise of these days,let it be said that of all who give gifts these two were the wisest."Said the writer in the last paragraph.Yes,they are wisest.They are the magi.Are there any reasons for us not to show respect for the young couple?

I remind my grandparents.They have spent fifty years together.No romantic words,no stirring behaviours,just comman even pedestrian life.But I can say love exists in every detail of their life.They have gone through war period,three years natural disasters,cultural revolution and so on.But no matter what happens,they are always considering for the other.Even now both of them have become old step by step,they still cared about each other.My grandparents,in my opinion,is a pair of lovers forever.

Love has nothing to do with money,possession or status.Its consideration,tolerance and respect.Its giving ones best to the other even it means sacrifice.Its affection which connects two persons hearts,and its reinforced by adversities.

Struggle against adversities.Nothing did they have,at least they owened love.Never give up as long as love exists.From"The Gift of the Magi",from Jim and Della and from my grandparents,I have learned a lot about love,life and hope.

动物之间也有爱，而且不像我们想象中那么单薄，而是很强烈，很浓厚的。

甚至比人类之间的爱，还要强烈!这几天，我一直在读动物小说大王沈石溪写的《鸟奴》，让我感受到了动物之间的那份浓厚、强烈、令人意想不到的那份真正的爱!这本书主要讲了：鹩哥为了让自己的儿女平平安安活下去，所以和蛇雕生活在一起。为了赢得活下去的权利，给蛇雕白白当努力，想借助蛇雕的伟兴吓吓蛇，让儿女成功的活下去，可最后几个儿女却一个个走向了死亡的世界里面生活。

在我看来，我认为鹩哥不因该为蛇雕白白的当努力，其实就是为了让儿女不受到蛇的危害，能成功地生存。可鹩哥凭自己的能力，能保护到它的家人，但一定要有信心，只要有信心，你一定能成功!从侧面的角度来讲，鹩哥每天给蛇雕打扫卫生做奴力，这都是为了谁呢?还不是希望儿女快快乐乐、幸福的活下去。再鹩哥认为，只要为了让儿女成功存活下来，不管做什么，不管受什么苦它都愿意，但只有这一个要求。

动物之间的爱如此伟大，只要让儿女存活，它可以放下自己的尊严，可以不管任何事情，只要让自己的儿女存活下来。这一种亲情，让人难以忘记。

Read "the old man and the sea" this article, I could not help secretly for Hemingways masterpiece. Image lifelike the story describes how an old man with a firm belief deftly will be a big fish to his humble, and how to get rid of "invasion of the enemy" -- a shark. Although he failed to bring the whole fish back, but his spirit is worth our learning: people must have the self-confidence, he will say to yourself "I can do it!" . You think about it, if the old man caught a fish, 7, 8 times more than himself he saw was afraid, put the fish, he can put the fish back to Hong Kong? No, no, he relies on ordinary people to accept such determination, to catch the big fish.

In our class, there is learning of poor students, they are lack of confidence to oneself, plus others ironic, then, they have no interest in learning, thus make grades decline gradually, falling...

Now the society developed, if can clone the self-confidence, that I must have a clone, send it to lack of confidence friend!

读了《老人与海》这篇文章，我不禁暗暗为海明威的巨作叫好。这个故事形象逼真的描写了一个老人是怎样靠着坚定的信念灵巧地将一头大鱼捕到自己那简陋的船上，又是怎样赶走“来犯之敌”――鲨鱼。虽然他没能将整条鱼运回去，但他的精神值得我们学习：人要有自信心，遇事要对自己说“我能行!”。大家想一想，如果这位老人钓到了一条比自己大上7，8倍的鱼，他见了就害怕，把鱼放了，那他能将鱼运回来为自己争光吗?不，不能，他正是靠着这样常人难以接受决心，才能捕到这条大鱼。

在我们班上，有学习差的同学，他们就是对自己信心不足，再加上旁人的讽刺，这时，他们对学习毫无兴趣，从而使学习成绩逐步下降，下降……

现在的社会发达了，如果能克隆自信心的话，那我一定克隆一份，将它送给信心不足的朋友!

书中描写诸葛亮足智多谋，神机妙算，上通天文，下达地理，采用多角度立体描写。

刘备纳了水镜先生的真知灼见：“伏龙，凤雏得一可安天下。”于是，三顾茅芦，请诸葛亮出山相肋，虽关张不悦，虽大雪漫天，天寒地冻，虽一而再，再而三，但功夫不负有心人，刘备终求得孔明出山为军师。此既写刘备求贤如渴，又写了诸葛亮恃才高傲。

曹操谋士程昱评价徐庶曰：“十倍于昱”。徐庶评价诸葛亮十倍于自己，孙权谋士鲁肃评价诸葛亮十倍于己。诸葛亮也自比管仲、张良。可见诸葛亮是个高人中的高人。

诸葛亮分析天下大势，审时度势，精当了得：曹操拥百万之众，挟天子以令诸侯，此诚不可与争锋;孙权据有江东，已历三世，国险而民附，此可用为援而不可图也。荆州北据汉、沔，利尽南海，东连吴会，西通巴蜀，此用武之地，是上天拿来资助刘将军的。又曰：“将军欲成霸业，北让曹操占天时，南让孙权占地利，将军可占人和。先取荆州为家，后即取西川建基业，以成鼎足之势，然后可图中原也……”刘备闻言，顿首拜谢。只一席话，乃孔明未出茅芦，已知三分天下，真万古之人不及也!

诸葛亮出山首战用火攻，次战也火攻再加水淹，大败曹军，建立奇功。在关张心目中树立了绝对权威，也让曹操尝到了诸葛亮的厉害，由不识到认识，初知他是个不好对付的敌人。

周瑜年少英雄，可他打曹操用的反间计，苦肉计皆被诸葛亮一一识穿，周瑜为东吴计也为嫉妒驱使，当然容不得诸葛亮，几次要杀亮，皆被鲁肃劝止，诸葛亮在七星坛作法借得东南风后，即由赵云保护逃逸，又让周瑜扑了个空，真乃神机妙算，料事如神矣。

鲁肃劝周瑜杀亮不如劝亮降归东吴，孙权谋士诸葛瑾乃亮之兄也，受命劝亮，打出亲情牌，亮接招打出忠义加亲情两全牌。亮曰：“兄所言者，情也;弟所守者，义也。弟与兄皆汉人。今刘皇叔乃汉室之胄，兄若能去东吴，而与弟同事刘皇叔，则上不愧为汉臣，而骨肉又得团聚，此情义两全之策也。不识兄意以为何如?”瑾思曰：“我来说他，反被他说了我也。”遂无言回答，起身辞去。

我看以后小说诸葛亮式人物的描写，离不开《三国演义》的写法。由此脱胎而来，有比较成功的范例，如罗贯中的弟子施耐庵写《水浒》中的梁山军师吴用也大有诸葛亮的气质神韵。不少计谋是诸葛亮的变化。后世把诸葛亮当成鞠躬尽萃，死而后已，忠诚报国，聪明智慧，谋略大家的代名词。足见小说把诸葛亮写活了，后世很难超越。