傲慢与偏见英文读后感（热门20篇）

After reading "A tale of two cities"

"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickenss most important representative works.The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution,intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel,and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes.The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on,which displayed peoples great strength.

The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually ， Lucie is beautiful and gentle ，Charles is graceful and noble，Lorry is upright and honest ，Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm,unconventional but also selfless and lofty，Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal，Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister......The complex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge,but take the life as the price.

As an outstanding writer,in Dickenss work,the language skill is essential.Each kind of rhetoric technique,like the analogy,the exaggeration,the contrast,the humorous,and the taunt are handled skillfully,and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak."A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes.With the broad real background of the French Revolution,the author take the fictional character Doctor Manettes experience as the main clue,interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together,the plot is criss-crossed,and the clue is complex.The author use insert narrates,foreshadowing,upholstery and so many techniques,causes the structure integrity and strictness,the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature,it displayed the remarkable artistic skill.the style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy,fills indignantion,but lacks the humor of the early works.

我很久以前就有机会看《傲慢与偏见》，但说句心里话，当时我并不认为这本书有多好，甚至只看了个开头就放到了一边，心想：语言如此贫乏，故事又无激动人心之处，怎么会成为世界名著呢?

这次我是在偶然间弄到这本书，由于书的主人极力推荐，我满腹狐疑，才决定看完之后再对此书下一个自己的定论。这种想法推动下，我花了一些睡觉时间将它看完，于是对它的看法大为改观(当然，假如一点好感都没有，那我也就没那种耐心用睡觉时间来看它了)。

不过，我这里所谓的改观，并非指完完全全、彻彻底底地改变了原先的看法。我所谓的改观，是指现在才发现它并非毫无优点。

先说说我发现的优点吧。从风格上看，它有与众不同之处，这是毫无疑问的，大多数书都是从男性的角度看世界，即使是《简·爱》和《呼啸山庄》，也基本上从男性的角度来写，而《傲慢与偏见》则明显地充满了女性思想色彩，包括世界观及生活方式。这一点在写作内容上得到最好体现：假如是男作家，写出的作品大多具有惊险色彩(只是强弱一些的问题)，而本书中，最激动人心的一段也不过是威克姆与伊丽莎白之妹私奔(而且结局并不悲惨)，作者能想到的最恶劣的行径，也只是一些人与人之间的简单欺骗;贯穿全文的一件事就是母亲如何嫁女儿。这一系列的事实，都表现了这本书的女性化，而这类书在那个时代当然极少，所以我认为这是本书极大的成功之处。

一部好的小说应当可以反映一个时代的风貌，就这一点而言，此书也表现得相当成功。读了这本书，头脑中不难形成当时欧洲女性社会的状况——所有女子都以嫁出去作为一种荣誉，而不管嫁给谁，婚娶成了妇女唯一的人生目标，真正的感情既少见，又难以被理解，作者深刻揭露与批判的正是这些。

谈到缺点，我想与其他书作比较：就运用语言的能力而言，它不及《基督山伯爵》;就故事的曲折丰富性而言，它不及《乱世佳人》;就表现社会现实的高度而言，它不及《钢铁是怎样炼成的》;就人物心理描写而言，它不及《呼啸山庄》。虽然这些缺陷很大程度上是由它要描写的社会现实决定的，但一本名著出现这么多的漏洞，毕竟是太过分了。

读完这本书，我极想将它与《乱世佳人》进行完全深入的对比。这两本书在故事内容，情节发展上太相似了，就连人物选取也如出一辙：达西对应瑞德，伊丽莎白对应斯佳丽，宾利对应维希礼，简对应媚兰。前两者间关系都由感情封冻到暖化，再到热烈;后两者的感情则始终如一。唯一不同之处是，前者以和平为背景，后者以战争为背景。所以我将《傲慢与偏见》称为和平版《乱世佳人》，试想，让宾利处在乱世，他必然会与维希礼一样落魄。相反，维希礼在开始时也是十分体面的绅士。

但在感情的激烈斗争与转化上，《傲慢与偏见》完全无法与《乱世佳人》对比，《乱世佳人》以战争为背景，那么感情冲突自然容易表现，尤其是战争的宏大场面(例如亚特兰大溃退，北军围城)，这一幕幕都是如此激动人心，以至于读者难以释卷。这些对《傲慢与偏见》来说是无法达到的艺术效果。对整场战争及战后的社会问题，《乱世佳人》也都表现得很成功，于是这本书的境界也就由儿女私情升华为对国家、对社会的深刻思索，这些也是《傲慢与偏见》的匮乏的东西。

从整本书的艺术性来看，《傲慢与偏见》的确不及《乱世佳人》。但这在深刻思索后的确不难发现，也不难理解。奥斯丁作为女作家，并无太多人赞同(当时社会意识就认为女子无法写小说)，这当然造成了女作家在许多写作才能上不及男作家(例如世界观及知识的丰富性)。尽管我可以原谅这些不足，但相对于同样的女作家夏洛蒂与艾米莉，奥斯丁也显然有这些方面不足。所以至今我还坚信，《傲慢与偏见》的确有许多过人之处，但毛姆将它列为世界十大著名小说之一就未免言过其实了。

“男大当婚，而一个富有的单身汉自然是要找个佳人结婚的。”试想一下，此“佳人”该拥有何种特征?中国古代老话叫做“门当户对”，如果是富有的单身汉，那么按古话所说，自然也是一位富有人家的小姐了。

但出乎意料的是，在《傲慢与偏见》中富有的达西先生却娶了一位家世和身世都十分平凡的伊丽莎白小姐。也许很多人会感到困惑，达西先生既有身份又有地位，怎么就会娶了一位看起来和自己门不当户不对的女人呢?

其实门当并不一定户对，两个人即便身份悬殊，但只要是两情相悦，再多的金钱也无法弥补那一份珍贵的情。就如达西先生和伊丽莎白小姐一样，是爱情令他们没有了地位的悬殊，也是爱情让他们最终走到了一起。所以，婚姻应以爱情而不是以财产与地位为基础的，门当并不一定就要户对。

然而，在现实生活中，有的人却过于追求以财产与地位为基础的婚姻。例如，在电视节目《非诚勿扰》上，就有一位女嘉宾曾提出过“宁愿坐在宝马上哭，也不愿在自行车上笑”的婚姻观，其实，我认为这确实是一个可笑的观点，如果仅仅只盲目追求物质生活，而忽略了精神生活，这与给了你一大笔钱却让你患上抑郁症又有什么区别呢?

不仅如此，从许多现实的女明星身上，同样能看出这样的问题。例如，港台著名影星大S前不久就嫁给了著名食品集团的董事长汪小菲;跳水运动员郭晶晶嫁入豪门……如此多的女明星嫁入豪门，这不禁令我们怀疑，他们之间是否真的存在爱情，或是他们的婚姻仅仅只是以财产和地位为基础的婚姻，这个答案也只有真正的当事人才得知，但从许多的女明星嫁入豪门后的悲惨遭遇可推断出，也许爱情在双方的婚姻中都未能起到太大的效果。这也是女明星的可怜之处吧，她们曾在早年时扬名一时，却在即将人老珠黄之时，为保留原有的风光，只好另寻“贵人”，然而，这种只把财产和地位看作结婚首要条件的婚姻不要也罢。

其实，我很喜欢达西先生和伊丽莎白小姐，他们一个傲慢，一个抱有偏见，但最后在逐渐交流中，傲慢与偏见渐渐消除，他们也在相互的了解中慢慢爱上了对方。没有金钱、身份和地位的阻挠，单纯只是两个人相爱了，但这足以让结局皆大欢喜。

then man treat GREat event in ones life with punishing， Demonstrate different attitudes to the love question of the marriage of young girl of the family origin of middle class of villages and towns， Thus reflected authors oneselfs marriage view: It is wrong to get married for the property， money and position; Get married and does not consider that above-mentioned factors are unwise too .

So， she objects to getting married for money ， objecting to regarding the marriage as a trifling matter . She emphasizes the importance of the ideal marriage ， and regard men and womens emotion as the foundation stone which concludes the ideal marriage.

the woman protagonist in the book Elizabeth comes from the little landlords family， reaches the west to have deep love for for the rich and powerful people sons and younger brothers. Reach the disparity of ignoring family status and wealth of the west， propose to her， but is refused. Elizabeths misunderstanding and prejudice to him are a reason， but a main one is the arrogance that she dislikes him.

Reach the thes of the west in fact status the reflections of difference， exist this kind arrogant， Not having common thoughts and feelings between he and Elizabeth， the marriage that can not have lofty ideals . Elizabeth watches conducting oneself in society and a series of behavior of reaching the west personally afterwards， See he change the proud conceited expressions of passing by， dispel misunderstanding and prejudice to him， Thus concluded the happy marriage with him.

更多热门文章：

Let me tell what I feel after reading the great work Jane Erye.I was really move by Jane Erye after closing the book.What a kind and good woman!Mrs Eyre had a heart of gold.She really loved everyone around her,and gave others help sincerely.She respected herself and did her best to do everything.I really love her.She are both a great teacher and a good friend of mine.Sometimes when I am confuse,I will think of her.I will imagine what will she do if she is I.Why not read Jane Erye my friends!

简.奥古斯丁的力作《傲慢与偏见》在将近2020年的历史中，折服过众多的善男信女，通过解除傲慢与偏见给正常沟通造成的障碍，最终演绎出有情人终成眷属，在世上传为佳话。

起初读《傲慢与偏见》是为了消除人们对我的偏见，尤其是剩女们对我的偏见。

昔日的堂堂清华博士后怎么做起剩女的文章?沦落到这地步?鄙视之意溢于言表。

曾经我从事水资源项目的时候也有不少人疑惑，为什么不为诺贝尔努力，做没有技术含量的水?我当时回答是解决我国水资源问题能给国家和社会带来多大的效益?我就算获得诺贝尔奖能够创造这么大的效益?

知识的价值在于它能够给社会带来多大的益处，而不在于荣誉、科技水平等，虽然也有这种因素，但毕竟不是核心的价值。那么给国家带来1-2万亿直接经济价值的水问题的解决应该远远超过获得诺贝尔奖的价值了!如果考虑间接价值恐怕怎么也有5-6万亿吧。所以，我当时就能够义无反顾的执着地追求。

对剩女的问题而言，虽然时代的进步和社会的发展，也许妇女的婚恋早已经不是唯一的生活目的。但是在任何社会，尤其在现在的我国，婚恋仍然是大多数女人的生活最主要的部分，甚至是全部。最少是生活不可或缺的重要部分。如果在很多方面很出色的女孩因为各种原因一时嫁不出去甚至终身嫁不出去，那么可以肯定的说耽误她的终身。如果我能够帮助找到意中人，过着美满的婚恋生活，那么在某种程度上说挽救了她的一生。因为婚恋问题的解决不仅可以使她享受天伦之乐，也可以帮助她在事业上更有信心。如果我解决一群人甚至一个群体的问题，那么这一事情的社会价值将是不可估量的。

当然，我相信绝大多数剩女是最后不会选择嫁不出去甚至终身嫁不出去的!那么在大多数剩女认识到婚恋在她人生中的价值的一天，客观的经济效益也是可以预期的。这样通过产生巨大的社会效益的同时不仅可以挽救我，也许还能够挽救我的事业。

在《傲慢与偏见》文中，我没有想到自己也受到很好的教育，原来我自己的傲慢也是沟通的主要障碍之一。虽然我也是时常告诫自己尽量避免无谓的错误，消除不该有的误解和损失，但是毕竟江山易改本性难移呀!最要命的是我自己有足够的理由并且确信我的观点的时候就是很难做到给人不“傲慢”的印象。我只好更努力学会倾听的艺术消减不良后果了。

The Scarlet Letter offers an extraordinary insight into the norms and behavior of the 17th century if American Puritan society.The basic conflicts and problems of its main characters,however,are familiar to readers in the present.The female protagonist,has borne a child out of wedlock and has been jailed for over three months and sentenced to wear a symbol of her adultery,a scarlet “A” on her dress at all times.It concerns about the moral,emotional and psychological effect of the sin on people in general.It’s not simply a love story or a story of sin.The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne uses the scarlet letters to symbolize the harshness of Puritan society,showing how they brand sinners for life.

The story happened in Boston about 200 years ago.It narrates love affairs between three persons.The punished woman.Hester Prynne and his husband.Who called himself Roger Chillingworth .He is an old misshapen man and a doctor.Hester does not love him at all.Another man is a young minister,Dimmesdale,who has a high position among ministers and is highly respected among his people in town.Hester and Dimmesdale love each other.But their love is forbidden in that time .It is sinful.Due to this,Hester is punished by society with a letter A on her chest,which considered an evil,a shame.

In this novel,the mainline seems to be around the letter A.Hester is brave enough to face the cruel reality.She is always with a mind of courage.She has been alone with her child for so long ,with litter communication.Shame!Hopelessness!Loneliness!Hester has to wear the letter A day after day,seven years as for punishment and ill fame.

When a woman has lived through a difficult experience,her character changes a great deal.If she be all tenderness,she will die.If she survive,the tenderness will leave her .Hester’s charitable deeds and quiet humility have earned her a reprieve from the scorn of the community.The letter on her chest represents her work on earth ,always helping others,without expecting any thanks.Never afterwards,does that scarlet letter leave her chest.The townspeople no longer view the letter as a punishment ,but rather as representing her great strength and bravery and thy say it means “Able”.

But Arthur Dimmesdale,his sin against Hester and Pearl is that he will not acknowledge them as his wife and daughter in the daylight.He keeps his dreadful secret from all those under his care in the church for seven years for fear that he will lose their love and will not be forgiven.He is too weak to admit his sins.He suffers from mysterious heart trouble,seemingly caused by psychological distress.What’s worse,he is an advisor to the townspeople about their sins.

After Mr.Dimmesdale’s death ,no one changes more in appearance than Roger Chilling worth.All his strength and energy has been used to harm his patient .This unhappy man has made his aim in life to add to the suffering of the young minister.When the evil old man no longer has such a purpose,the devil takes him back to the hell .It is a curious subject of observation,however,whether hatred or love are not of the same place.Each takes a great deal of emotion from one person.The two feelings seem basically the same,expect that one is smiled upon by God,while the other is worshipped by the devil.

If a woman has even a tiny sense of dignity, she must shoulder any number of sacrifices rather than have her love varnished with venal character by asking for money from her lover. Extravagances, luxury as well as all other empery pleasures are valuelein front of love. As long as you love me, I ask for nothing else.

-------Marguerite(La Dame Aux Camellias)

Whenever I lingered over the magnificant story, I cannot help deeply touched by the bitterly sweet love, which struck the world as gentle as an April shower, as pure as a blowing snow, as heady as an old wine. It condensed a paradise into a kept woman’s heart, which caught and held us transfixed against prejudice in mind and greed in nature, , and provided a journey that brought home to us a comprehensive understanding of love.

Marguerite, as a kept woman,did not undergo the usual penalty of confronting wrinkles appeared under her eyes, the first death of a courtesans, but was endowed enough fortune to enjoy an unselfish and gorgeous love during her ephemeral life, witch came as a wonderful oasis to lead supply a new prospect in a disparate desert, appeared as a miracle medication to heal her wound in the sinful life, figured as a brisk spring to refresh and revitalize her lonely heart, and emerged as a great beacon of courage to kill all her bad habits in the past and make a firm determination to seek for a peaceful but fantastic life with her loved one.

Lingering between the words, we could completely feel how kind and dignified she was. She refused Armond although she knew he was really loved her with his soul. because of her gloomy despair of life, she did not turn up in his life as a figure who was sad, ill, gay with a giant sadder than grief, besides witch, who spit blood and spent a hundred thousand francs in a year. Touching this words, how can we avoid our zealous sympathy for her? She bickered with the marquis and drove him away from her family, because she hated and refused to be treated as merchandise. Touching her deeds, how could we deny our high respect for her? At last, she renounced all her hope and life just because another woman’s name. What she e although you may get hurt, but it is the only way you can live absolutely. But what she experienced, what she faced and what she did made her a real sublime angle and an eternal ideal woman in people’ heart.

However, no matter what devout wish, no matter what gorgeous love, or no matter what strong struggle, the society was so stone stubborn that it would never show any mercy for a kept woman. Just as Armond said, when God allow a kept woman to accept a real love, it is indeed a grant comfort, but also remorselepunishment, for the man holds the cruel authority to say to his lover, “ Your love is just a kind of commodity”, though the woman had devoted all her heart and spirits to her loves. It cannot denied that it was Marguerite’s joyous fortune to have Armond in her poor destiny, but at the same time, it is also have to be admitted that what a hopeletorture she tolerated and what a disappointed suffering she endured at the last part of her life. It was really too much to her. We even cannot tell what kind our feeling soared inside our bosom, but just happy with her, sad with her, waiting with her, wishing with her, and disappointed with her……

shall we criticize Armond for his foolish and brute deed to Marguerite as he got the same hurt by his horrible vengeance? Shall we condemn Armond, father for his selfish monologue which destroys the kind woman’s dream? Shall we judge the motionlemerchant and policemen’s actions before the dying woman?

I have read some parts of this nover when I was about thirteen years old,but the book was really too thick for me to read over patiently.It’s a pity that I haven’t finished it till now.But fortunately, I have watched the movie “Pride and Predudice”directed by an American film studio several months ago.

The simple but pure plot,the wonderful song,the classical custume, the luxury ball,the scene full of amorous feelings from the British country,the beatiful and stubborn actress,all of these moved me deeply.Mr. Darcy,the actor of the nover,a nobleman from the uper-classes in England,because of this , he has an inborn superiority that he looks down at every person from the lower-classes .

He don’t like neither their life style nor their way to think.Elizabeth,the actress of the nover,an obstinate,wise young girl from the lower-classes of the country.She dosen’t like anyone who is constumelious,she hates the spurs from the pride men. By these, you know,there’er lots of conflicts between them,but at last,Darcy and Elizabeth,the two different even opposite youngsters fall love .That’s very incredible.

In fact,we are always pride and think something in our mind but not right,we assess the others only depend on their background or their color of skin , we hide our true heart and pretend ,we dispise the others without any reason……But why don’t we ask ourselves in our heart or mind: what do we feel in fact? What do we need in fact? What do we hate and love in fact? Why not express our real feelings at once?Why not chase the happy we really want ?

If we can go through the hindrances that set by ourselves,if we can express the true feelings we have and say it out loudly and clearly to somebody we want to tell with, if we can give up the contumely and spurns which block us to get long well wigh the others wo love,if we can live together harmony and sincere, if ……If that day really comes,the love will come too.

我不经意间看到《傲慢与偏见》的电影海报，就去下载下来看，看完电影之后，我感触很多。我就打算认真的阅读下这篇由简·奥斯丁所写的《傲慢与偏见》，这是简·奥斯丁的代表作。当我认真的阅读一遍之后，觉得自己应该更加细细品味书中主人公的感情，畅游于书中可以洗涤心灵的思想之泉。

《傲慢与偏见》的创作背景，它是简·奥斯汀最早完成的作品，她在1796年开始动笔，原本取名为《最初的印象》，1797年8月完成。她父亲看后很感动，特意拿给汤玛·卡士德尔，请他出版，但对方一口回绝，使得他们十分失望。后来，她重写了《最初的印象》并改名为“傲慢与偏见”于1813年1月出版。

《傲慢与偏见》可以说是英国著名女作家简·奥斯丁的代表作，作品描写傲慢的单身青年达西与偏见的二小姐伊丽莎白、富裕的单身贵族彬格莱与贤淑的大小姐简之间的感情纠葛为主线。以及穿插了在伊丽莎白身边缔结的多个幸福或不幸的婚姻，揭示了作者对那个时代妇女的理想和期望。也引出了另一群人的爱情和勇气的故事。

《傲慢与偏见》的开头是以这样一句话开头的，“凡是有财产的单身汉，必定需要娶位太太，这已经成了一条举世公认的真理。”简·奥斯丁将她的哲理通过爱情这个人人都知道的事物来表达。如果说这本书是讲爱情故事，可是我们看不到什么甜言蜜语的句子。我们看完《巴黎圣母院》，也许会被卡西莫多那种要于爱斯美拉达的那种生死相随的爱情所感动，但是我们看完《傲慢与偏见》，你会觉得简·奥斯丁把这边书写的很理智很贴近现实，简·奥斯丁写的不是爱情，而且婚姻。

在当时的那个年代，婚姻的先决条件是男方有可观的家产，女方则要有丰厚的嫁妆时，他们婚姻幸福也就被世人认为理所当然。这样可以看出婚姻要建立在物资基础上。在这种现象中，还有那么一些人勇敢的追求爱情，追求自己的幸福，这点令我很感动。

看完小说，我发现小说一直在传递三种观点。

一、美满的婚姻是要在爱情的基础上。

“没有爱情的婚姻是不会幸福的”，这是简·奥斯丁一直强调的重点。小说很多例子可以体现出这个重点。被母亲娇纵完全不知廉耻为何物的丽迪亚被风浪流子韦翰的外表所迷惑，不顾一切的与他私奔，虽勉强结了婚但婚后并不幸福；风流的韦翰对丽迪亚的爱情很快的淡了，常常跑到城里寻欢乐，两人挥霍无度，连生活都难以维持，可以看出这个婚姻只有一时的迷恋没有永久的爱情，结局自然不是很美好。

伊丽莎白的好友夏绿蒂从小受到的家庭教育是注重门第、讲究地位。在这样的熏陶下她与班纳特家的财产继承人柯林斯结了婚。柯林斯不仅为人做作、举止粗俗，唯一可取的便是溜须拍马之功。但他可以继承班纳特家的财产，且自己有一份田地和一份牧师的俸禄。仅仅为了这些，当柯林斯向伊丽莎白求婚失败后的三天中，夏绿蒂一直借看望好友伊丽莎白为由，与柯林斯朝夕相对，终于在第三天使柯林斯向她求婚。她成了柯太太，却不惜失掉伊丽莎白多年的友情。其实她也有不得已的地方，没有丰厚的嫁妆意味着没有幸福的婚姻，年龄颇大的夏绿蒂只有把握住这次对她而言难得的机会。起码，她将来的生活有了着落，可以成为班家大宅未来的女主人。于是，她与认识不到三天的柯林斯结了婚。婚后，她不断忍受着丈夫令人生厌的怪异行为，她唯一的安慰是使她的新家有条不紊，并在

世人面前构建一个美满的家庭。可见，纯粹建立在经济基础上的婚姻也毫无真正的幸福而言。

班纳特家的大女儿简美丽善良、温柔娴静、却性格拘谨，她爱宾利却不露痕迹；而宾利先生遇事缺乏主见，拿不准简究竟是否爱她，加上宾利的妹妹不想让没有什么财产和社会地位的简成为她们的嫂嫂，他们的婚姻受到很多面的阻碍，但是他们相互喜爱彼此，最后他们终于克服了障碍幸福的在一起了。但

伊丽莎白的婚姻更说明了这个观点。在《傲慢与偏见》中，伊丽莎白的两次拒绝别人的求婚充分地证明了她理性的婚姻态度：“没有爱情的婚姻是不行的”。首先她拒绝了未来庄园与财产的继承人和有一份牧师工作的柯林斯先生。让自己被母亲骂说是“固执的傻丫头，不知好歹”，而柯林斯先生认为伊丽莎白和那些高贵的女性一样，使用欲擒故纵的方式来获取他的爱慕。就是因为她知道自己需要的是什么，她追求的并不是财富，而是一个与自己能在心灵上相互慰藉的伴侣，这在当时得需要多大的勇气呵。第二次，她拒绝了年收入为一万英镑的绅士达西的第一次求婚。因为达西那时候求婚是非常傲慢。当伊丽莎白拒绝达西求婚时，达西说了一句话：“要是我耍一点手段，把我内心的矛盾掩饰起来，一味地恭维你，使你相信我无论在理智方面、思想方面以及其他各方面，都是对你怀着无条件的纯洁的爱，那么也许你就不会有这些苛刻的责骂了。可惜无论是什么样的伪装，我都痛恨。”对于这样子的表白，伊丽莎白自然是不能接受，并不客气的表示对这种傲慢的愤怒：“照人情事理说来，感激之心是应该有的，要是我果真觉得感激，我现在就得向你表示谢意；可惜我没有这种感觉我从不稀罕你的抬举，何况抬举我也十分勉强”。傲慢、孤傲的达西沒有为了讨好伊丽莎白，而改变他的性情。聪慧、善良的伊丽莎白也没有为了依附权贵而阿谀奉承，卖力讨好，双方都勇于表现了很真实的自己，表现出了最真实的一面。

在达西求婚被拒绝后的第二年，伊丽莎白随舅父母来到达西的庄园，与他再次相遇。她发现达西变了，不仅对人彬彬有礼，在当地很受人们尊敬，而且对他妹妹非常爱护。她对达西的偏见渐渐消除，却并不知这些改变都是为了她。就在这时发生的另外一件事情，使得伊利沙白对达西的认可更深了一步。达西得知伊利沙白的小妹莉迪亚随身负累累赌债的威克姆私奔了的消息以后，不仅替魏克翰还清赌债，还给了他一笔巨款，让他与莉迪亚完婚。自此以后，伊丽莎白往日对达西的种种偏见统统化为真诚之爱。

二、个性吸引成就美满婚姻

简·奥斯汀在强调婚姻的基础是爱情的同时，也强调了个性对婚姻的影响。个性上的偏见和个性上的缺点会影响着一个人对幸福的追求，这也行就是小说从《第一次印象》改为《傲慢与偏见》的原因。这点我们可以从班纳特夫妇以及伊丽莎白与达西的婚姻中看到。

班纳特夫妇是简·奥斯汀在《傲慢与偏见》中描述的唯一的一对老夫妇。“班纳特先生是个古怪的人，一方面乖觉诙谐、好挖苦人；另一方面又不苟言笑、变幻莫测，他太太积二三十年经验还摸不透他的性格”。而“这位太太的脑子就不那么难捉摸了，她是一个智力贫乏、孤陋寡闻、喜怒无常的女人，一碰到不称心的时候，就自以为神经架不住。她平生最大的心愿，就是把女儿们嫁出去；她平生最大的慰藉，是访亲拜友和打听消息”。夫妇两人不管在性格、品味、爱好都没有共同之处。班纳特先生当年因为贪恋美貌，娶了一个智力贫乏而又心胸狭窄的女人，婚后不久就终结了对她的一片真情，夫妇间的相互尊重和信任早已荡然无存，他对家庭幸福的期待已成为泡影，这是一个反面的例证。

我们在看伊丽莎白和达西先生的婚姻，达西先生的傲慢和伊丽莎白对他的偏见是小说的主干线，两个人性格上的冲突是小说的主要线路。伊丽莎白是全书中最出众的人物，与姊妹们相比，她最大方；与势利眼的宾利小姐们比，她又有人格的尊严、精神上的优越；在她所处的那个充满愚人的世界中，她是唯一有理性的人。她的理智、活泼、爱打趣，善于对人冷眼旁观并直看穿其心思，让达西先生不自主的爱上她。而达西先生的出场就引起全场人的注意，因为他身材魁伟，眉清目秀，举止高贵，同时年收入是一万英镑的绅士，但是因为达西先生趾高气昂、不苟言笑、爱挑剔人，虽然受过良好的教育，举止却不受人欢迎。两人初次见面，就以达西先生傲慢的拒绝与伊丽莎白共舞让伊丽莎白对他产生了偏见，在加上韦翰在从中造谣中伤达西先生，这让伊丽莎白对达西先生的偏见越来越深了。不过伊丽莎白的个性深深的吸引着达西先生，让达西先生不顾众人的反对向伊丽莎白求婚。在被伊丽莎白拒绝求婚之后，他仍然爱着这位女孩，为了她改掉自己的缺点。在一年后，伊丽莎白再次见到达西先生，发现他变了，伊丽莎白就消除了对达西先生的偏见，更情不自禁的爱上了达西先生，虽然他们的性格在外人看来是很难想象他们会结婚的，但是在伊丽莎白看来：“这样的结合对双方都有好处，她天性随和，活泼开朗，可以把他陶冶的性情温和，举止随和；而他断事精明，见多人广，阅历深厚，她一定能够在这方面获益匪浅”。故事的结局真是他们幸福的在一起了。

三、财产是婚姻的保障

《傲慢与偏见》中不免会体现出简·奥斯汀对婚姻的观念，她不回避的写出了金钱对婚姻的重要性，书中的夏绿蒂的婚姻就是典型的案例。在小说中，夏绿蒂是个受过良好教育、头脑聪明、处事得体，颇得女主伊丽莎白赞赏的女子。但是她经济非常的拮据，若不结婚，她就只能寄居在哥哥家中做个老处女姑娘。她明明知道柯林斯先生并不爱她，因为他刚刚向伊丽莎白求婚被拒绝；而她对这种为人作作的人没有什么感情，但是他家境殷实，而且马上就能等到班纳特家的财产，所以她就鼓励柯林斯先生接近并接受他的求婚。之后，她向伊丽莎白坦言：“你知道，我这个人不浪漫，我只求有个舒服的家；考虑到柯林斯先生的性格、社会关系和社会地位；我相信，跟他结婚我会获得幸福，也会享受到别的伴侣们所炫耀的那种幸福”。

简·奥斯丁没有让伊丽莎白与夏绿蒂决裂，尽管伊丽莎白认为夏绿蒂是一位丢了自己的脸，被人看轻的朋友。但是因为夏绿蒂的选择完全符合当时的婚姻道德和标准。

我们在看小说的女主人公伊丽莎白，她坚持要有爱情的婚姻才是幸福的，但是她没有说排斥富裕的物资生活。当她第一次看到彭伯里气象万千的美景时，她也满怀感触，不禁觉得：“在彭伯里当个主妇也不错”。当她参观达西先生的大厦时，她也会情不自禁的感慨：“我差一点就做了这儿的主妇呢！这些房间也许早就让我走熟了！我非但不必以一个陌生人的身份来参观，而且可以当作自己的住宅来享用”。如果不是后来她想到了达西先生的为人，伊丽莎白可是会真的要后悔当初拒绝达西先生的求婚了。当后来她接受了达西的求婚，姐姐简追问她是什么时候开始爱上达西时？她也老实说：“应该是从看到他那美丽的花园算起”。小说结局是伊丽莎白过上了舒舒服服、风雅有趣的生活。如若没有经济作后盾，可不容易办到。可见，财富成为了美满婚姻生活的重要保障。

可以这么说，在《傲慢与偏见》中，女主人公在获得爱情的同时也获得了财产这也就是简·奥斯丁心目中的美满婚姻。

既赢得爱情又赢得财产的婚姻在现实生活中是难得的，尤其对于那些家世并不显赫，没有财产继承权的女性。即便她们美丽聪慧，受过良好教育，但在选择婚姻上十分被动。在《傲慢与偏见》中，她赋予了女主角伊丽莎白美丽的外表，聪明的头脑以及圆满的婚姻不就是告诉世人：优秀的女子应该得到最美好的婚姻！

这是一本非常值得阅读的书籍，用最普通的生活，最普通的题材，来让这本小说变得丰富又有内涵，成为精典之作。简·奥斯丁的《傲慢与偏见》真实地反映了当时英国乡村的社会现状，又深刻地批判了中产阶级庸俗的婚姻观，同时也真切地展示了纯真爱情的曲折动人。

说道《傲慢与偏见》这本书，我早已被它的题目所吸引，我的脑海闪过一个念头：傲慢与偏见，不错嘛!应该挺好看吧。看完后果然没有令我失望，使我明白了一些为人处世的方法与技巧：不要太相信第一次的直觉，有些人，要长久相处才能真正彼此了解。

小说主要写了伊丽莎白和达西的爱情波折，也次写了简与宾利的爱情。我觉得这部小说最主要的是折射出当时英国绅士们的狂妄自大，及对那些爱攀权势的人的强烈讽刺。像班纳特太太这种唯利是图的人，总想着将自己的女儿嫁给有钱人，她是当时腐败贵族的一个鲜明代表。伊丽莎白自尊、简朴、不追求奢侈的富贵令我佩服。

达西虽然开始时待人很傲慢无礼，但他在多次向伊丽莎白求爱失败后能反省自己，变得热心助人，令伊丽莎白另眼相看，在得知丽迪雅随身负累累赌债的威翰私奔了，伊丽莎本以为达西会瞧不起自己，想不到达西不仅替威翰还清赌债，还给了他一笔巨款，让他与丽迪雅完婚，最终对伊丽莎白的求婚成功了。达西知错能改、热心助人的性格是十分值得我们学习的。

事实上，在我们生活中，也存在许多傲慢与偏见的例子：富人对穷人的歧视与穷人对富人的偏见、知识人才对文盲的鄙视与文盲的愤愤不平、人与人之间的妒忌成恨。其实，我们每个人都是平等的，有钱的应努力去为这社会贡献，而不是高高在上目中无人，没钱的也不必自卑，应该去追求知识致富，不卑不亢、落落大方，这样的社会，利你利我利大家，何乐而不为呢?

“凡是有钱的单身汉，总想娶位太太，这已经成了一条举世公认的真理。这样的单身汉，……人们总是把他看作自己某一个女儿理所应得的一笔财产。”简·奥斯汀在《傲慢与偏见》中描写了几对年轻人的爱情故事，小说没有重大的历史事件为背景，而是以幽默细腻的笔触展现了18世纪末19世纪初英国乡村中产阶级生活的画面，表明了作者对于爱情的态度。像夏洛蒂和柯林斯那样互不了解、没有爱情的婚姻是不会幸福的，而聪明、美丽、自尊的伊丽莎白与达西的感情则是建立在相互了解与尊重的基础上，他们才是幸福的。

初读小说中译本是大约十多年前的事了，那时只是醉心于伊丽莎白与达西这对淑女绅士之间曲折但终成正果的爱情，加之喜欢小说流畅俏皮的文笔，所以一连读了好几遍。

与小说同名的电影同样令我着迷，它在对小说的整体把握与剪裁、演员的表演、配乐等方面均可圈可点。电影限于篇幅删去了一些次要人物和情节，但伊丽莎白与达西、简与彬格莱、夏洛蒂与柯林斯以及莉迪雅与韦翰这四对年轻人的恋爱婚姻仍然脉络清楚、不枝不蔓。演员的表演可称上佳，达西由最初的傲慢到情不自禁到放下架子倾心相爱，伊丽莎白优雅聪明、自信自尊，班纳特太太缺乏修养、忽喜忽嗔，柯林斯谄上倨下、滑稽可笑，还有凯瑟琳夫人傲慢无礼、出言荒唐，无不纤毫毕现，特别是后三位配角略带夸张的表演，实在令人忍俊不禁。电影的配乐也非常符合影片诙谐幽默的气氛，凡柯林斯出场必配以轻快富于跳跃感的音乐，凡凯瑟琳夫人出场则配以沉重庄严的背景音，给影片增色不少。

但若吹毛求疵的话，影片还是有几处不足。其一是莉迪雅与韦翰私奔后达西才特地前往伊丽莎白家，向她说出韦翰过去的卑劣行径，而小说则安排达西求婚遭拒之后即给伊丽莎白写信，解释韦翰之事。达西之所以要解释，是因为伊丽莎白误会了他，令他自尊心受挫，而待到私奔之事发生后，韦翰的品格已经暴露，解释已无太大必要。因此立即解释似乎比等到人家家中大乱再去解释更为合理。

To Live Happily All the Time

——about “Three Men in A Boat”

Most fairy tales end like this:“They live happily ever after.” But to George, Harris and J, “ever after” is far from enough. Their belief is to live happily ALL THE TIME. Who are these three guys? They are the “bestest” pals from a humorous English book — Three Men in A Boat.

Just take a look at these three funny guys: You can meet them anywhere at any time. All of them have great aspirations and plenty of passion. But in the morning, none of them like to wake up early. All of them want to be great explorers. But on rainy days, they all prefer to stay by the warm fireplace. Yes, it’s our Harris, George and J. And now, they are taking a vacation on the famous Thames.

They started off in a little boat, which none of them would like to drive. They kept explaining that they didn’t come out for fun—they were taking a rest because of some so called “dreadful disease”。 When they were traveling, they couldn’t stop making jokes on others. When they were cooking, they couldn’t stop the eggs from getting on their pans. when they finally gave up the boat and went home by train, they still couldn’t stop telling each other how clever it was to be “three men out of boat”……

Such a simple story has brought me lots of laugher and thoughts. I laughed over their funny troubles and funny talkings all along the trip. And also I found that I came to admire them after laughing each time. Because when they met something in trouble, or their own complicated jobs came, first, they would burst into laughter at once, and then started to solve the problem slowly with partience and happiness. Sometimes I was surprised by them. Because something that happens in our daily life such as losing the wallet, or a bad weather, will make every one of us complain and be upset for long. But how about the three men in the boat? They will certainly laugh at it first! They giggle, they grin, they smile. They have taught me how to laugh at trouble, to smile at hard work, and to laugh away tears. It’s a good way to face my blue days. As a student, I always complain about my homework, my parents, and my classmates. But George, Harris and J told me: there’s no point in complaining. Just face your life and try to find the good side of everything. And also remember to cherish friendship—like the three of them.

Yes, yes. Sometimes they seemed to be “cynical” or “lazy”。 But the fire of live, diligence, and happiness is burning in their hearts all the time. To them, the so called “dreadful disease” is only an excuse for their going out to relax. To them, all the trouble is the chance to use both patience and laughter. To them, all the hard work is the gift from God to make them stronger and happier.

Don’t just stare at the “happy ending” of “living happily every after”。 Think about the three men in the boat. They are common guys like you and me. But they are all very great—They have the ability to make themselves live happily ALL THE TIME.

假期读了两本书，期中一本是《傲慢与偏见》，它是简·奥斯汀的代表作。讲述了乡绅之女伊丽莎白·班内特的感情故事。

第一次读它的时间是在大学的图书馆，这次弄到一本英文版，其实国外作品英文版跟翻译版还是有差别的，翻译版多多少少都带有翻译者自已的一些理解与感情在里面，我觉的相当是二次创作。

如果你能读英文版，就不要读翻译版，差别在哪，不在故事，而在每句话带给你的想像力是不一样的。刚开始读起来有点吃力，可是读了几章后感觉就好多了。

读完后能够说，18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情又真实再此刻脑海中。

看完后对“傲慢与偏见”也有更深的体会。书中的世态人情在当下，又不何尝不是呢？

“傲慢让别人无法来爱我，偏见让我无法去爱别人。”

——摘自《傲慢与偏见》

因为班主任布置的经典小说的任务，我拿起了一直放在书架上的那本“外国名著”。——但是我并不喜欢。

对于我来说，那些枯燥的名著里并不会有现在言情小说里的轰轰烈烈，所以我一直对于名著有些抵抗。我也不知是不是先入为主的观念，所以让我觉得其他小说也理应如此。

但是当我翻开第一页的时候，我就有些惊讶，它并不像是其他小说一样开头就开始叙述感情线——也许是现在感情线主流小说的原因吧。

简·奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》语言非常精练，在故事方面有很大的空间，给人一个无限的遐想空间。若真用漂亮的词语来形容，我便要说：作者深厚的文字功底让我感觉像是做了一场梦，梦里如同掠过竹林的风，带给我竹林般的清凉，泉水般的清澈，让人随时随地沉迷于其中。

我能选择这本小说，应当是因为里面的爱情故事。当今的社会，有太多美好、不美好的故事了，所以当我每次觉得社会冷漠，并没有我想的那么温暖的时候，我就会寄情与网络上的言情小说，便一发不可收拾。

可是当我看完了这本书，我真心觉得——当初的想法错了。

这个世上的事情，总要是看自己用什么角度去看的。在这部描写爱情与婚姻的小说里，和我当初看的文章大相径庭。小说围绕班奈特太太如何把五个女儿嫁出去的主题展开。书中一共写了四队青年男女的结合，作者一一加以比较，批判，爱憎分明的阐述了自己的爱情与婚姻观。富有傲慢的达西和睿智具有反叛精神的伊丽莎白，温柔体贴的简和有权有势的宾利，以及莉迪亚和威克姆，夏洛蒂与柯林斯。

不同的文体风格让我感受了不同的样子，如同一位叫做伊丽莎白的女孩所追求的一样——面包、玫瑰。若两者不可得兼，舍玫瑰而取面包者也。

有的时候，这才是现实，即使我们还不能理解，但是终有一天会面临压力。可是心中追求爱、追求美的欲望却不会停滞。

书中的平等。《傲慢与偏见》，这个书名便是在平等的观念下产生的。

取其精华去其糟粕，让我们回归眼下，期待能看到更多发展的雏鹰。

“根据我的书本知识，我坚信傲慢是一种流弊，人性在这一方面极为脆弱，因为我们很少有人不因为自己的某种品质或者其它什么而沾沾自喜、洋洋自得，不管这种品质是存在于真实中，还是仅仅存在于想象中。虚荣和傲慢尽管常被用作同义词，实际上却是两回事。一个人可能傲慢但不虚荣，傲慢是我们对自己的评价，虚荣则是我们希望别人如何评价我们自己。”

最近读了法国著名作家小仲马的代表作：《茶花女》，连读两遍，意悠未尽。我被书中男女主人公的爱情故事而感动，读到伤心之处，未免掉泪。

Recently read on behalf of the famous French writer Alexandre Dumass work: "La Traviata", read two times, will you not. I was touched by the book of love stories, read the sad place, it tears.

现代人都想得到真挚的爱情，都想得到异性的真爱，也时刻在讨论什么是爱?是否有真正的爱情?《茶花女》给了我们一个正确的答案：男女之间的情爱，是一种奉献、是一种给予、是一种忠诚，是牺牲、是无私，不是索取，更不是骗取;真心实意的为对方着想，为对方去做事任可牺牲自己的一切，能使对方幸福做为自己最大的快乐和满足。

The modern people want to get true love, want to get specific moments in the discussion of love, but also what is love? If there is true love? "La Traviata" gives us a correct answer: between men and women in love, is a kind of dedication, is a given, is a kind of loyalty, sacrifice, selfless, not to take, but not to cheat; have a genuine and sincere desire for the sake of each other, each other to do any sacrifice everything, can to make each other happy as his greatest pleasure and satisfaction.

我想每个人在通读小说，在为男女主人公悲欢离合而高兴、而担心、而落泪的同时，检讨一下自己在情感方面的得与失，才能更加珍惜自己的爱情，善待亲情和友情。

I think everyone to read novels, and happy, in grief at separation and joy in Union for the hero and heroine and worry, and tears at the same time, to review their own in the emotional aspects of the gain and loss, to cherish their love, treat affection and friendship.

one of the most interesting questions about gullivers travels is whether the houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of swifts satire. in other words, in book iv, is swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? if we look closely at the way that the houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

first we have to see that swift does not even take gullver seriously. for instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. also, when he first sees the yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. he says, "i must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. this is why swift refers to erasmus darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the beagle-to show how gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. but if lemule gulliver is satirized, so are the houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. they walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. as gulliver says, "it was with the utmost astonishment that i witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a vienese waltz. to my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the lord edmund burke" . as this quote demonstrates, gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. for instance, the leader of the houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of charles dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the kings and queens of england up to george ii. swift subtly shows that this houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of queen elizabeths husband.

swifts satire of the houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. one of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that guenivre has brought with him to the island. first she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. but when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "as i watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than mr. pope being fitted by a clothier. she dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. my horse sniffed the creature and turned away." it might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. but it makes more sense if we see that swift is being satiric here: it is the female houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century england. the houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress gullivers horse. gulliver imagines the horse saying, sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held mr. pope on her back makes me queezy .

a final indication that the houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the houynhms visits lilliput, where he visits the french royal society. he goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at gallilee). the scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "the creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

he has accomplished the scientists goal, but the scientist is not happy, for his livelihood has now been destroyed. swifts clear implication is that even though the houyhnhmns are smart, they do not know how to use that knowledge for the benefit of society, only for their own prideful agrandizement.

throughout gullivers travels, the houyhnhms are shown to be an ideal gone wrong. though their intent might have been good, they dont know how to do what they want to do because they are filled with pride. they mislead gulliver and they even mislead themselves. the satire on them is particularly well explained by the new born houyhnhm who, having just been born, exclaims, "with this sort of entrance, what must i expect from the rest of my life!" .

"In order to property, money and position and the marriage is wrong; the marriage does not consider the above factors also stupid." This sentence can come to this book.

One distinctive characters in "her" lifelike; Clever sensible Elizabeth, sincerity, persistence, darcy, gentle tolerant Jane, frivolous superficial Lydia, no mind, Mrs Bennett relatively ineffective Mr Bennett, selfish snobbish miss bingley, mighty lady Catherine, boring Collins, and so on. Among them, admirable, sympathetic, or a smile. In addition, the dialogue between the characters in the novel is also a feature of the novel. Elizabeth witty words, Mr Bennett its sarcasm to him, for the khans rhetoric, Collins rap wording, which make readers view. Do you know of who "she" is? "She" is the author -- Jane Austen.

The book was welcomed by generations of readers, and love. "Pride and prejudice", published in 1813, a love story is novel, the novel of the communist party of China involves four marriage, but each have each characteristic.

In a word, no matter from content and Austins novel narrative techniques, "pride and prejudice" is a classic.

“为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的;而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。”这句话正好可以来讲明这本书。

一个个鲜明的人物形象在“她”的笔下栩栩如生;聪明理智的伊丽莎白，真诚执著的达西，温柔宽容的简，轻浮浅薄的丽迪亚，没有头脑的贝内特太太，相对无能的贝内特先生，自私势利的宾利小姐，不可一世的凯瑟琳夫人，无聊透顶的柯林斯等等。他们中，有的令人佩服，有的令人同情，有的令人忍俊不禁。此外，小说中的人物对话也是小说的一大特色。伊丽莎白的机智话语，贝内特先生对他它的讽刺挖苦，为可汗的花言巧语，柯林斯的饶舌措辞，无不让读者大饱眼福。你知道当中的“她”是谁吗?“她”就是作者——简.奥斯汀。

这本书受到一代又一代读者的欢迎、喜爱。《傲慢与偏见》发表于1813年，爱情故事也是小说主线，小说中共涉及了四桩婚烟，但各有各的特点。

总之，无论从小说的故事内容和奥斯汀的叙述技巧来说，《傲慢与偏见》都不失为一部经典作品。

《傲慢与偏见》是简·奥斯汀的代表作。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。

《傲慢与偏见》在书中是男女主角爱情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。人的缺陷太多，首先是心灵上的陷阱。要想在一生中成就一番事业，无论是知识、教养、还是爱情、事业，都需要同自己心灵的种.种浅浮的陷阱或阴影做斗争，经过各种误解和长时间的反复的认识过程，慢慢由心灵克服各自弱点和毛病，而走向开放、洒脱、自由的必然结果。扰扰尘世，做人不易;茫茫人海，佳偶难见。然而没有爱情不要勉强别人结婚，只要人品正直，追求美德，不放松向喜之心，不苟且、贪图一时之利欲，追求两心之和谐、相应，运用彼此的智慧，克服心灵上的缺点，终得如愿以偿。

人和人之间的相处总会有一些小小的摩擦，而这些摩擦，往往就是自己内心中所潜藏的弱点或毛病，要和别人能够更愉快的生活，就必须先了解到自己的缺点，并磨去他，其次是了解别人的内心，最后再互相深入彼此，如此一来，你会发现到社会上每一件人、事、物都是如此美好、光明，更进一步激发出你内心深处的感动，发挥出自己的专长去替这个社会、这个国家、这个世界服务，毕竟我门是万物之长，如果人们不再用心去关怀身边的人，不再去付出自己的一臂之力，那么还有谁要去完成这个任务呢?所以从现在开始，我们就应该将自己原先所存有的毛病给除去，换上一个全新的自我，为崭新的未来打拼吧!

Today I have read Helen Keller’s “Three Days to See”.I have read this article in the chinese teaching material when I was in high school.This article impressed me.It told me how lucky we are.We should aprrecaite that we are healthy.Healthiness is riches.So today I read this article again.Whenever I read this article,compare with Helen Keller,I think we should treasure our life,god has given us sight so we can see a lot of good things,so we can know how beautiful this world is,so we can know how wonderful we can live in our coloreful life.

Helen Keller,blind and deaf from infancy.Stricken with a serious illness at the age of nineteen months,Keller survived from the illness but was left permanently unable to see and hear.In this article,three day of sight,we can see,how precious it was as for Helen Keller.What would you want to look at if you had only three days of sight?Helen gives her answer in this famous essay.I always think that people can realize the importance of the sight and sound only after they have personally expericenced the dark and silence life.Darkness would make him more appreciative of sight,silence would teach him the joys of sound.

This short story tell people how Keller take advantage of having the privileges to see,hear,and speak.Some people,unfortunately,are blind,deaf,and mute.These unfortunate people take more time to appreciate life and they are always waiting for the miracle all their life.The author,Helen Keller,is one of such person who is blind,deaf,and mute.She strongly believes that people,who are fortunate to have such senses,take life for granted.She also strongly believes these people should live in the fullest,meaning,accomplish lifes when they can do this today,do not leave it for tomorrow.

One can die at any moment,no matter how healthy or in what physical shape he is.As for this,Helen came across many instances.She had asked her friend what she had seen after taking a walk through the woods,and her friend replied,“Nothing in particular.” Her friend gave she this answer,because her friend become accustomed to see the routine of their surroundings,and her eyes only can be attracted by startling and spectacular things.I think if we only have sight for 3 days we will give another answer.

I appreciate Hellen Keller.Her life is a miracle,she stronly face the difficulties which can detroy one’s mind of living.Her life is a tragedy,but the world in her heart is full of love.Her spirit will encourage all of us,forever.

简.奥古斯丁的力作《傲慢与偏见》在将近200年的历史中，折服过众多的善男信女，经过解除傲慢与偏见给正常沟通造成的障碍，最终演绎出有情人终成眷属，在世上传为佳话。

起初读了《傲慢与偏见》是为了消除人们对我的偏见，尤其是剩女们对我的偏见。

昔日的堂堂清华博士后怎样做起剩女的文章？沦落到这地步？鄙视之意溢于言表。

以往我从事水资源项目的时候也有不少人疑惑，为什么不为诺贝尔努力，做没有技术含量的水？我当时回答是解决我国水资源问题能给国家和社会带来多大的效益？我就算获得诺贝尔奖能够创造这么大的效益？

知识的价值在于它能够给社会带来多大的益处，而不在于荣誉、科技水平等，虽然也有这种因素，但毕竟不是核心的价值。那么给国家带来1-2万亿直接经济价值的水问题的解决应当远远超过获得诺贝尔奖的价值了！如果研究间接价值恐怕怎样也有5-6万亿吧。所以，我当时就能够义无反顾的执着地追求。

对剩女的问题而言，虽然时代的提高和社会的发展，也许妇女的婚恋早已经不是唯一的生活目的。可是在任何社会，尤其在此刻的我国，婚恋仍然是大多数女人的生活最主要的部分，甚至是全部。最少是生活不可或缺的重要部分。如果在很多方面很出色的女孩因为各种原因一时嫁不出去甚至终身嫁不出去，那么能够肯定的说耽误她的终身。如果我能够帮忙找到意中人，过着美满的婚恋生活，那么在某种程度上说挽救了她的一生。因为婚恋问题的解决不仅仅能够使她享受天伦之乐，也能够帮忙她在事业上更有信心。如果我解决一群人甚至一个群体的问题，那么这一事情的社会价值将是不可估量的。

当然，我相信绝大多数剩女是最终不会选择嫁不出去甚至终身嫁不出去的！那么在大多数剩女认识到婚恋在她人生中的价值的一天，客观的经济效益也是能够预期的。这样经过产生巨大的社会效益的同时不仅仅能够挽救我，也许还能够挽救我的事业。

在《傲慢与偏见》文中，我没有想到自我也受到很好的教育，原先我自我的傲慢也是沟通的主要障碍之一。虽然我也是时常告诫自我尽量避免无谓的错误，消除不该有的误解和损失，可是毕竟江山易改本性难移呀！最要命的是我自我有足够的理由并且确信我的观点的时候就是很难做到给人不“傲慢”的印象。我只好更努力学会倾听的艺术消减不良后果了。