傲慢与偏见英文读后感（精选20篇）

Its a short story by O.Henry that has moved me for a long time.Maybe most of you are familar with its name,that is,The Gift of the Magi.I have read it many times but every time I like to read it slowly and deliberately.I think "The Gift of the Magi"

is meant to be savored.

Maybe there is no necessity for me to repeat the main idea of the story.But Im

so fascinated with the short story that I want to retell it yo you,and to myself.

It happened to a very poor but blissful young couple named Jim and Della in the end of 18th century in England.Because of the maladies of that society and the effect of economic crisis,they worked hard but earned little.Life is very hard for them.Despite of this,their love to each other and the enthusiasm for life didnt changed at all.When Chrismas day was approuching ,Della used the money she got from selling her beautiful hair which she treasured very much to give Jim a fob for his grandfathers pocket watch.But Jim had already sold that watch to buy Della tortoiseshell combs to wear in her long hair,not knowing shed cut it off.

It appears that the gifts they gave each other have been useless.But I think they gave each other the best of what they had to make the other happy.Isnt that true love?We can image,in such rough conditions,as it said in the story,"Life is made up of sobs,sniffles,and smiles,with sniffles predominating."Itst absolute reasonable for them to be beaten by the misery.But the fact is that no matter how tough life had been,they wouldt lose heart.With strong faith and their love ,they did their best to make the other pleased."Whennever Mr. James came home and reached his flat ,above he was called Jimand greatly hugged by Mrs. James."Maybe this account is the best description of their love and struggle against hard life.It was said that the povertier life is ,the firmer and truer love is."Actually,theyd given the very best they had out of love.

"They are too foolish children in a flat,who most unwisely sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house.But in a last word,to the wise of these days,let it be said that of all who give gifts these two were the wisest."Said the writer in the last paragraph.Yes,they are wisest.They are the magi.Are there any reasons for us not to show respect for the young couple?

I remind my grandparents.They have spent fifty years together.No romantic words,no stirring behaviours,just comman even pedestrian life.But I can say love exists in every detail of their life.They have gone through war period,three years natural disasters,cultural revolution and so on.But no matter what happens,they are always considering for the other.Even now both of them have become old step by step,they still cared about each other.My grandparents,in my opinion,is a pair of lovers forever.

Love has nothing to do with money,possession or status.Its consideration,tolerance and respect.Its giving ones best to the other even it means sacrifice.Its affection which connects two persons hearts,and its reinforced by adversities.

Struggle against adversities.Nothing did they have,at least they owened love.Never give up as long as love exists.From"The Gift of the Magi",from Jim and Della and from my grandparents,I have learned a lot about love,life and hope.

This is a story book, the inside of the story is preposterous, quirky and funny; This is a but with more than pages of books, the show is just a little girl in a long afternoon met there can all kinds of animals and men; This is also a even in fairy tale books seem most ordinary book, all the characters in the story can speak, all with their own idea-this and any a fairy tale almost no different than any.

From beginning to end, the story is so strange. Alice has been somehow become bigger or smaller that I almost drowned by his own tears; She met a lot of animals and a lot of people, try to talk and talk to them, but they are not completely normal, and it is not friendly; She has not been ?

翻译：

中文：这是一本故事书，里面的故事荒诞不经，离奇而可笑;这是一本不过百余页的书，所展现的仅仅是一个小女孩在一个漫长的下午遇见的各种不可能存在的动物和人;这也是一本即使在童话书中都显得极其普通的书，故事中的所有角色都会说话，都有自己的想法——这与任何一个童话故事相比几乎没有任何不同。

从头至尾，整个故事都是那样的奇怪。爱丽丝一直莫名其妙地变大变小，以至于差点被自己的眼泪淹死;她见到了很多动物和很多人，试着和他们聊天说话，只是他们都完全不正常，而且并不友好;她一直不停地问这问那，但是对方——不管是谁都不会给她一个合乎常理的答案，可是爱丽丝居然还会相信!这一切都让我如此地哭笑不得。当爱丽丝梦游的时候，我好像也在梦游。看着一堆错误赫然摆在眼前，而我，却束手无策：这就是所谓的“仙境”吗?

"In order to property, money and position and the marriage is wrong; the marriage does not consider the above factors also stupid." This sentence can come to this book.

One distinctive characters in "her" lifelike; Clever sensible Elizabeth, sincerity, persistence, darcy, gentle tolerant Jane, frivolous superficial Lydia, no mind, Mrs Bennett relatively ineffective Mr Bennett, selfish snobbish miss bingley, mighty lady Catherine, boring Collins, and so on. Among them, admirable, sympathetic, or a smile. In addition, the dialogue between the characters in the novel is also a feature of the novel. Elizabeth witty words, Mr Bennett its sarcasm to him, for the khans rhetoric, Collins rap wording, which make readers view. Do you know of who "she" is? "She" is the author -- Jane Austen.

The book was welcomed by generations of readers, and love. "Pride and prejudice", published in 1813, a love story is novel, the novel of the communist party of China involves four marriage, but each have each characteristic.

In a word, no matter from content and Austins novel narrative techniques, "pride and prejudice" is a classic.

“为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的;而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。”这句话正好可以来讲明这本书。

一个个鲜明的人物形象在“她”的笔下栩栩如生;聪明理智的伊丽莎白，真诚执著的达西，温柔宽容的简，轻浮浅薄的丽迪亚，没有头脑的贝内特太太，相对无能的贝内特先生，自私势利的宾利小姐，不可一世的凯瑟琳夫人，无聊透顶的柯林斯等等。他们中，有的令人佩服，有的令人同情，有的令人忍俊不禁。此外，小说中的人物对话也是小说的一大特色。伊丽莎白的机智话语，贝内特先生对他它的讽刺挖苦，为可汗的花言巧语，柯林斯的饶舌措辞，无不让读者大饱眼福。你知道当中的“她”是谁吗?“她”就是作者——简.奥斯汀。

这本书受到一代又一代读者的欢迎、喜爱。《傲慢与偏见》发表于1813年，爱情故事也是小说主线，小说中共涉及了四桩婚烟，但各有各的特点。

总之，无论从小说的故事内容和奥斯汀的叙述技巧来说，《傲慢与偏见》都不失为一部经典作品。

《简·爱》之后，今天又看完了《傲慢与偏见》，感觉蛮有味道的。与朋友聊天说看完这两本书，不知道为啥，却着实被鄙视了一般，也许吧，正经的公务员书籍会计书籍不去看，去看这么些杂书，着实太不正经。只是现在的记忆力越来越不行了，又让我想到了“快餐”这个词，既然如此，趁还记得，就记录下点点思绪吧。

女儿买回一本英文版的《傲慢与偏见》，沟起我对少年中学时代的回忆。

那年，正是我初二放假的时期，那天，我正聚精会神的“偷看”“第二次握手”。当我正如痴如醉的感动在握手的精彩故事情节时，大哥走过来，手里拿着一本书丢在桌面上，在丢下书的同时也丢下一句话：“好好看看，别成天自以为是，看完给我写读后感，我要检查的”，说完就走了。我愣了半响，半天没反映。拿起那本书一看，就是中文版的《傲慢与偏见》。

这是我看的第一本外国小说，看书之前，我并不明白大哥的用意，看完之后，才知道大哥的用心良苦。

因为出身在军人家庭，再因为优越的家庭环境，更因为是家中之掌上明珠，我总是昂首挺胸、目不斜视、目中无人一般，从来不知道天有多高地有多厚。除了长辈，除了大院里的孩子，除了需要关照的贫民百姓，对那些地方干部或一般阶层出身的孩子，我从不屑一顾，待人接物上从没给过好脸色、好语调。尤其是二个哥哥的同学到访，更是雪上加霜冷言冷语，这让二个哥哥很是头痛，虽不止一次的对我加以指责，只因我的反唇相击，令他们无奈则罢。

奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》，以日常生活为素材，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。它是一本既浪漫又现实的爱情故事，更是对人的个性和处世待人的一种行为和态度的认知。这本书，是我人生成长中第一个最为重要的认知转折点。

还是说说这本书吧，主人公是小贵族班纳特家的二女儿伊丽莎白和一个富家子弟达西，两个人的性格特色鲜明，一个直率坦诚但又略显固执，一个举止优雅事业有成而又有些目中无人的傲慢，这是刚开始阅读时的印象。

达西先生生于贵族家庭，年收入不下一万英镑，父母亲从小开始便教他保持高格调，并常常出入上流贵族社会中，慢慢养成了傲慢而目中无人的性格特点。处于贵族身份并且有着高收入的他，有着那份傲慢是应该的，只是，可贵之处在于达西的性格在于与伊丽莎白之间产生的爱情而彻底变化，由一个举止优雅但无比傲慢的贵族子弟变成乐善好施而又体恤他人、风度翩翩而举止依然不失风雅的上流人士。

伊丽莎白性格直爽坦诚，初入世事的她跟有着少女共同的特征，天真烂漫而对事物充满着好奇心，对爱情充满渴望而又谨小慎微。除姐姐吉英和父亲外，伊丽莎白与妹妹们的交流较少，我认为这也是作者在突出伊丽莎白成熟的特征。伊丽莎白的偏见是显而易见的，只是与其说是偏见，不如说是一种不服输的心理，而我觉得这倒是极为可爱的性格。

美好的事物总需要一波三折的过程来铺垫和润色。从开始第一次见面跳舞后伊丽莎白的偏见开始，伊丽莎白的眼中就只剩缺陷了，着实是一个傲慢的纨绔子弟，而他人对达西的所有负面评价都是对的，并且升值超过与他人的描述。直等到达西求婚不成，傲慢而客观的一封信，才导致伊丽莎白感情的转折，当然这次的打击也是达西性格的转变点。从此以后，伊丽莎白对事实的求证使得对达西的感情愈加升温，达西则变得越来越体恤他人。最后，达西准备再次向伊丽莎白求婚，伊丽莎白也在与内心斗争，达西的舅母对伊丽莎白的恐吓和威胁反而成为了这桩婚姻的催化剂，坚定了达西和伊丽莎白的心理。

我感觉这本书除了传达傲慢与偏见对人之间交流的阻碍外，同样在说明，如果爱一个人，另外一个人和自己是相似的，而且幕后做的事情总比眼前多的多。达西为了伊丽莎白，默默的帮韦翰还清了债务，并给了一定的财务支持，并最终促进了丽迪亚的婚姻而不致闹成笑话。而这一切，若非舅母柯林斯的回信，也许伊丽莎白永远也不知道达西所做的所有。而伊丽莎白，作为女性的内敛美也是表现的惟妙惟肖。母亲对达西的冷落和嘲讽，伊丽莎白的内心是如此忐忑不安与痛苦，默默承受心中的愧疚。眼神表达的情感是无法掩饰的，伊丽莎白直率而不愿高攀他人，但在几次与达西见面而不敢直视，脸胀通红，伊丽莎白所拥有的女性美展现的如此可爱……

说实话，对书中的爱情故事，因年少，我看的似懂非懂，也并不再意。而对书中女主人公伊丽沙白那补实真诚，以及在跟傲慢无礼的男主人公达西对话时表现出来的聪明才智，特别的欣赏和敬佩。

书中的对话机智幽默，妙趣横生。记得其中一句“如果你果真聪明的过人，那么你傲慢的就会有分寸”，也就是说，没有分寸的傲慢，是一种无知和无礼的表现，更是幼稚和自负的可怜。当一个人把自己看的比其他人都略高一等的时候，总会摆出一幅高高在上的姿态。在日常生活中，不经意间，我们不知不觉的也会成为傲慢与偏见的主角，而我就是无法认知自己的毛病成为了书中的主角，这是很可悲的。在读完这部著作后，我才体味到了它的价值所在。

很感激我的大哥，这本书对我日后的成长，起到了翻天覆地的变化。最起码，我的行为和态度有所改善，待人接物不在那么傲慢无礼，最重要的是，我懂得了什么叫尊重，在我成长的日子里，常常告诫自己：“尊严不是与生俱来的，而是要有内涵，用智慧和能力获得成就，那才是真正的有尊严；高傲也不是天生的，无知的高傲自己而贬低他人，这只会令他人看不起自己。真正有尊严、有才学的人绝不会如此妄自菲薄”。

《傲慢与偏见》中的人物刻画细腻，令人赏心悦目。这是一部优美而平和的作品，有很多值得我们深思的道理，值得一读。子曰：“朝闻道，夕死可矣。”吾曰：“阅毕一书，得一道足矣。”

This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following

Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?

The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane

met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In

dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

读了奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》让我知道了原来在遥远的欧洲不仅有罗密欧与朱丽叶那样悲壮的爱情，像莎翁那样的古典哥特式的美，原来也有市井家，回归生活的美。简单，精致，如同“两寸牙雕”，却窥视出了整个社会。

弗兰克奥康纳说：“我认为简。奥斯汀是英国文学史上最伟大的技巧局将一样，她在文学方面炉火纯青，就像莫扎特在音乐方面的完美无缺一样。”《傲慢与偏见》的语言如同掠过竹林的风，带给我竹林般的清凉，泉水般的清澈，让人可以随时随地的沉浸其中。那细腻的语言，缜密的思维，为我拉开了英国田园风光的帷幕，不经意间勾勒出了一个浪漫纯美的童话，却又那么的贴近生活。

这是一部描写爱情与婚姻的小说。小说围绕班奈特太太如何把五个女儿嫁出去的主题展开。书中一共写了四队青年男女的结合，作者一一加以比较，批判，爱憎分明的阐述了自己的爱情与婚姻观。富有傲慢的达西和睿智具有反叛精神的伊丽莎白，温柔体贴的简和有权有势的宾利，以及莉迪亚和威克姆，夏洛蒂与柯林斯。

贝内特夫妇五个女儿待字闺中，没有子嗣，依照当时的法律，他们死后家产须由远房内侄柯林斯继承，因此把五个女儿嫁到有钱人家，成了贝内特太太最大的心愿。于是在这样的背景下展开了整个故事的架构。虽然作者在作品中没有重大的社会矛盾，但她以女性特有的细致入微的观察力，真实的描绘了她周围世界的小天地，尤其是绅士淑女间的婚姻和爱情

风波。其实小说中的班奈特太太是当时社会大多数人的缩影，爱情对她们来说是不可靠的奢侈品，她们只看重物质，看重权势。所以当富有单身的宾利来到内瑟菲尔德庄园，便成了众人注目的焦点和谈论的话题，以及小说中对军官们到来，小镇人民细微的表情和言语的描写，将当时社会风气展现的淋漓尽致。

然而作者奥斯汀是一个具有批判精神的女性，于是她塑造了一个追求纯粹的爱情，多少有些藐视权贵的伊丽莎白。虽然小说写于19世纪初叶，但是她所阐述的爱情观与婚姻观放在当下中国却也依旧是那么热点的问题。看到社会中充斥着的拜金主义，炫富事件，小三，包养等心中竟升起一种荒凉，但这也并非真爱的缺失，而是社会问题。我个人认为这种狂热的拜金主义是因为社会制度的不够完善，本来在一个市场经济国家，对金的崇拜，对物质的追求是很正常的事，然而在中国却显得有些病态了，因为在中国没钱你便无法在这个社会生存下去，在“生存”这把悬于头顶的大刀压迫下，拜金现象自然变得严重，人间的真善美也在死亡的威胁下大大贬值。而在国外，特别是欧洲，因为社会保障制度的完善，哪怕你没钱，你还可以生存，所以在国外对艺术，对学术的追求热情远高于中国，同样在那样一个安逸的社会里，爱情观也让现代中国青年向往。

在我看来婚姻的奠基本来就应该是爱情，如同伊丽莎白所追求的一样。面包与玫瑰的选择，若二者不可得兼，取玫瑰而舍面包也。这种选择或许是因为我还没有面临生活的压力，但是追求爱，追求美的确是发自内心的呼吁。

但这只是个人的做出的选择罢了，在经济学中的一个重要基本假设

那便是人的欲望是无限的，而资源是有限的，所以人们总是在不停的面临选择，而我只是出于个人偏好更侧重精神，愿意承受更大的机会成本而已。同样，有些人更侧重于物质，这只是一个选择，没有对错可言。然人毕竟是社会性动物，当大部分人做出了同样的选择，那这个选择便成了一种风气，久而久之，便成了一种习俗。之所以将题目设为“两寸牙雕”，不仅是因为《傲慢与偏见》的精巧细致，更是因为通过这个“牙雕”窥见了当时的风气，抛开爱情不谈，还有其他的一些感慨。

首先让我感慨的是当时人们对法律的敬畏和遵守因为整个故事的构架便是在依据当时法律贝内特夫妇死后财产由远房内侄继承这个源动力的作用下进行的，可见当时法治发展的水平。

其次是平等，“傲慢与偏见”这个书名便是在平等的观念下产生的，达西因为在交际舞会上不肯与他

人跳舞，让伊丽莎白认为他十分傲慢，以至于产生了偏见。要认识和结交朋友都必须与他人一同跳舞，随时更改舞伴，尽兴而为，虽然这个平等具有局限性，但这些应该便是现在欧洲国家自由，平等，法治等观念的雏形。这些从两寸牙雕中观察出的细末，让我回眼中国的当下，期待能发现更多的进步雏形。

“凡是有钱的单身汉，总想娶位太太，这已经成了一条举世公认的真理。这样的单身汉，……人们总是把他看作自己某一个女儿理所应得的一笔财产。”简·奥斯汀在《傲慢与偏见》中描写了几对年轻人的爱情故事，小说没有重大的历史事件为背景，而是以幽默细腻的笔触展现了18世纪末19世纪初英国乡村中产阶级生活的画面，表明了作者对于爱情的态度。像夏洛蒂和柯林斯那样互不了解、没有爱情的婚姻是不会幸福的，而聪明、美丽、自尊的伊丽莎白与达西的感情则是建立在相互了解与尊重的基础上，他们才是幸福的。

初读小说中译本是大约十多年前的事了，那时只是醉心于伊丽莎白与达西这对淑女绅士之间曲折但终成正果的爱情，加之喜欢小说流畅俏皮的文笔，所以一连读了好几遍。

与小说同名的电影同样令我着迷，它在对小说的整体把握与剪裁、演员的表演、配乐等方面均可圈可点。电影限于篇幅删去了一些次要人物和情节，但伊丽莎白与达西、简与彬格莱、夏洛蒂与柯林斯以及莉迪雅与韦翰这四对年轻人的恋爱婚姻仍然脉络清楚、不枝不蔓。演员的表演可称上佳，达西由最初的傲慢到情不自禁到放下架子倾心相爱，伊丽莎白优雅聪明、自信自尊，班纳特太太缺乏修养、忽喜忽嗔，柯林斯谄上倨下、滑稽可笑，还有凯瑟琳夫人傲慢无礼、出言荒唐，无不纤毫毕现，特别是后三位配角略带夸张的表演，实在令人忍俊不禁。电影的配乐也非常符合影片诙谐幽默的气氛，凡柯林斯出场必配以轻快富于跳跃感的音乐，凡凯瑟琳夫人出场则配以沉重庄严的背景音，给影片增色不少。

但若吹毛求疵的话，影片还是有几处不足。其一是莉迪雅与韦翰私奔后达西才特地前往伊丽莎白家，向她说出韦翰过去的卑劣行径，而小说则安排达西求婚遭拒之后即给伊丽莎白写信，解释韦翰之事。达西之所以要解释，是因为伊丽莎白误会了他，令他自尊心受挫，而待到私奔之事发生后，韦翰的品格已经暴露，解释已无太大必要。因此立即解释似乎比等到人家家中大乱再去解释更为合理。

故事中女主角伊丽莎白第一眼看到男主角达西就是不顺眼的，加上男主角个性的傲慢，继而对他有了偏见。而男主角达西，是个不受人欢迎的傲慢男子，也不屑于周遭冷淡的人际关系，对他来说，傲慢也许是有理的，偏见却很无情，这两者产生的冲击是免不了的。两个人之间也因此而常有针锋相对的言辞，彼此之间的傲慢和偏见就造成了一开始的不愉快与误解，但是经过种.种事件的澄清，彼此又渐渐产生一点点的感情。达西代表着“傲慢”,伊丽莎白代表着“偏见”,他们一开始都被自己的情绪所牵引。接着一连串对达西不利的流言，更让伊丽莎白对达西反感。当达西向伊丽莎白求婚而遭到拒绝时，他说了一句话：“要是我耍一点手段，把我内心的矛盾掩饰起来，一味地恭维你，使你相信我无论在理智方面、思想方面以及其他各方面，都是对你怀着无条件的纯洁的爱，那么也许你就不会有这些苛刻的责骂了。可惜无论是什么样的伪装，我都痛恨。”达西没有为了讨好伊丽莎白，而改变他的傲慢性情。伊丽莎白也表现了很真实的自己，彼此都不刻意去营造给人的印象，表现出了最真实的一面。而开始的时候，伊丽莎白一直活在自己的偏见之下，而忽略思考事实的真相，经过达西的解释和自己的判定，才最终找到幸福的归宿。

傲慢与偏见，是我们很常见的弱点和毛病。每一个人其实都很轻易被自己的主观印象所驱使，因而轻易对别的人下不正确的注解，进而造成了彼此之间的误会。一个人所给予的第一印象固然可以影响到很多事，但并非一定不会改变，要有更加深入的了解，才能有更客观一点的论点，就似乎故事中女主角对达西的看法，就是因为了解才有所改变。因此，在现实生活中我们应该要善于发现身边人的优点!

最近读了法国著名作家小仲马的代表作：《茶花女》，连读两遍，意悠未尽。我被书中男女主人公的爱情故事而感动，读到伤心之处，未免掉泪。

Recently read on behalf of the famous French writer Alexandre Dumass work: "La Traviata", read two times, will you not. I was touched by the book of love stories, read the sad place, it tears.

现代人都想得到真挚的爱情，都想得到异性的真爱，也时刻在讨论什么是爱?是否有真正的爱情?《茶花女》给了我们一个正确的答案：男女之间的情爱，是一种奉献、是一种给予、是一种忠诚，是牺牲、是无私，不是索取，更不是骗取;真心实意的为对方着想，为对方去做事任可牺牲自己的一切，能使对方幸福做为自己最大的快乐和满足。

The modern people want to get true love, want to get specific moments in the discussion of love, but also what is love? If there is true love? "La Traviata" gives us a correct answer: between men and women in love, is a kind of dedication, is a given, is a kind of loyalty, sacrifice, selfless, not to take, but not to cheat; have a genuine and sincere desire for the sake of each other, each other to do any sacrifice everything, can to make each other happy as his greatest pleasure and satisfaction.

我想每个人在通读小说，在为男女主人公悲欢离合而高兴、而担心、而落泪的同时，检讨一下自己在情感方面的得与失，才能更加珍惜自己的爱情，善待亲情和友情。

I think everyone to read novels, and happy, in grief at separation and joy in Union for the hero and heroine and worry, and tears at the same time, to review their own in the emotional aspects of the gain and loss, to cherish their love, treat affection and friendship.

《傲慢与偏见》这部小说虽然主要篇幅都是谈婚论嫁，但却不被视为爱情小说，而被视为世态小说。书中的时代背景造就了不同的爱情观，在这部书中，作者把恋爱和婚姻置于比一般言情小说更为宽广的社会环境中，里面人物的活动大多是开放性的，理性的，现实的，反应了她那个时代的世态人情，然而又不会让人感觉通俗浅显，她对人物鲜明形象和故事情节的生动刻画，能很好的引起读者的兴趣，“精心选择的语言和机智幽默”代表了《傲慢与偏见》艺术形式方面的本质。

这篇小说是以达西和伊丽莎白的爱情故事为主线的，他们最开始的互相讨厌,后来慢慢地互相爱慕。在当时人们以财富来衡量一个人,在那个年代的英国,爱情要受到社会,阶级,家庭,还有很多方面的因素的制约和考验，因为所生活的环境不一样，男主角达西是一个出生，财产，地位和教养都非常好的人久而久之的优越感，让他产生了一种傲慢的态度;而女主角伊丽莎白地位比较低，财产少，出于自己强烈的自尊心，就会对那些地位高，而且傲慢的人产生一种偏见;于是傲慢与偏见就这样阻隔在他们两人之间，成为他们的障碍，并为此蒙蔽了自己的眼睛，在经历了一系列波折后，他们的爱情成功的战胜了他们的傲慢与偏见，灰姑娘的美丽童话终于有了一个完美的结局。

在现实生活中，不管是爱情还是友情或者是同事同学之间的一些感情也很容易受一些主观的因素的影响，成为我们成长路上的阻碍，我们在与他人的交流和交往过程中，多多少少都会有一些大大小小的摩擦，这其中也会暴露我们的很多缺点和毛病，在这过程中，我们要善于发现自身的缺点和问题，学会从自身上找毛病，然后再认真的改掉，正如傲慢与偏见那样隐藏在自己身上的毛病，要学会去面对并改正，然后在和周围的人交流，你会发现前面的路会平坦很多，而你所需要的爱情或友情叶惠美进展的更加顺利。

少一些傲慢与偏见，多一些理解和宽容，也许下一个路口，你就会豁然开朗，然后发现事情并不像想象中的那样复杂。

英俊骄傲的绅士达西先生，美丽聪慧的淑女伊丽莎白的小姐，由于傲慢和偏见而产生的爱情纠葛为线索，描写了四段姻缘故事，文笔辛辣而滑稽，是小微很喜欢的一部作品哦!有兴趣的同学赶快去图书馆吧!

《傲慢与偏见》是简·奥斯汀的代表作，也是简·奥斯汀最早完成的作品，她在1796年开始动笔，原名《最初的印象》，通过婚姻问题的描写展示了当时英国社会的生活画面。小说讲述了乡绅之女伊丽莎白·班内特的爱情故事。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。并多次被改编成电影和电视剧。

《傲慢与偏见》或许是全世界最伟大的爱情小说之一，它“告诉你女性有权过得更好，而不应认为女性理所当然就该怎样”。“反对日常性别歧视”组织的创始人劳拉·贝茨说，是“第一次有人说女性的思想值得倾听”。《傲慢与偏见》于1813年问世。这本书在评论界得到欢迎，沃尔特·斯科特爵士赞扬奥斯汀“笔法巧妙”，“把平凡普通的事务和角色变得有趣”。

《傲慢与偏见》描写中产阶级男女的爱情与婚姻。在奥斯汀之前，18世纪后期的英国小说中有一股女性感情潮流，充满伤心流泪的感伤情调和为忧郁而忧郁的嗜好。《傲慢与偏见》克服了这种倾向而接近于现代生活。她在小说中运用喜剧的手法表达对生活的严肃批评，探索女主人公从恋爱到结婚中自我发现的心理过程。女主人公和达西的婚姻是作者颂扬的“为天下有情人树立一个榜样”的幸福婚姻。

“傲慢让别人无法来爱我，偏见让我无法去爱别人。”

——摘自《傲慢与偏见》

因为班主任布置的经典小说的任务，我拿起了一直放在书架上的那本“外国名著”。——但是我并不喜欢。

对于我来说，那些枯燥的名著里并不会有现在言情小说里的轰轰烈烈，所以我一直对于名著有些抵抗。我也不知是不是先入为主的观念，所以让我觉得其他小说也理应如此。

但是当我翻开第一页的时候，我就有些惊讶，它并不像是其他小说一样开头就开始叙述感情线——也许是现在感情线主流小说的原因吧。

简·奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》语言非常精练，在故事方面有很大的空间，给人一个无限的遐想空间。若真用漂亮的词语来形容，我便要说：作者深厚的文字功底让我感觉像是做了一场梦，梦里如同掠过竹林的风，带给我竹林般的清凉，泉水般的清澈，让人随时随地沉迷于其中。

我能选择这本小说，应当是因为里面的爱情故事。当今的社会，有太多美好、不美好的故事了，所以当我每次觉得社会冷漠，并没有我想的那么温暖的时候，我就会寄情与网络上的言情小说，便一发不可收拾。

可是当我看完了这本书，我真心觉得——当初的想法错了。

这个世上的事情，总要是看自己用什么角度去看的。在这部描写爱情与婚姻的小说里，和我当初看的文章大相径庭。小说围绕班奈特太太如何把五个女儿嫁出去的主题展开。书中一共写了四队青年男女的结合，作者一一加以比较，批判，爱憎分明的阐述了自己的爱情与婚姻观。富有傲慢的达西和睿智具有反叛精神的伊丽莎白，温柔体贴的简和有权有势的宾利，以及莉迪亚和威克姆，夏洛蒂与柯林斯。

不同的文体风格让我感受了不同的样子，如同一位叫做伊丽莎白的女孩所追求的一样——面包、玫瑰。若两者不可得兼，舍玫瑰而取面包者也。

有的时候，这才是现实，即使我们还不能理解，但是终有一天会面临压力。可是心中追求爱、追求美的欲望却不会停滞。

书中的平等。《傲慢与偏见》，这个书名便是在平等的观念下产生的。

取其精华去其糟粕，让我们回归眼下，期待能看到更多发展的雏鹰。

“根据我的书本知识，我坚信傲慢是一种流弊，人性在这一方面极为脆弱，因为我们很少有人不因为自己的某种品质或者其它什么而沾沾自喜、洋洋自得，不管这种品质是存在于真实中，还是仅仅存在于想象中。虚荣和傲慢尽管常被用作同义词，实际上却是两回事。一个人可能傲慢但不虚荣，傲慢是我们对自己的评价，虚荣则是我们希望别人如何评价我们自己。”

Love, can give new life; love, you can give people the sun-like warmth; love, you can give people unlimited happiness and joy.

This is a story about a small puppet - the old carpenter Ze Pide will laugh cry a piece of wood can be carved puppets, and to obtain life as the son of a small puppet. T-shirt to sell the old carpenter for a small puppet school. But the little puppet bent on fun, deceived many times and experienced the frustration again and again ... Finally, he fell into a large whales belly, the old carpenter Pi Panuo meet with an accident, after this adventure, Pino Cao has finally grown up, he becomes an honest, hardworking, kind, has become a real boy.

Although most of this story is about a small puppet setbacks in the process, but that the reader can think of this story contains a strong love. Pinocchio is no textbooks, old carpenter Pi Panuo own shirt for a book to a small puppet, despite their being affected by cold, but also with the greatest power to bring a small puppet happy, what a great father ah.

My childhood, love is the mother, because she is always guarded, love me, but my father was only concerned about a few. As I was growing up, and gradually understanding father. Mother to the warmth of love, and my father but it is tough to love.

Even my fathers work very hard for me to learn he would not be negligent. As I progress, I did not praise, but only a "test better next time, for the best results of their own"; if I was losing, they will like the ancient emperor issued a "decree"; "next some point to do! "then that is a few long-winded, but at this time, in his words, not a lot of criticism, but about encouraging ... ...

In fact, every father loves his children are not directly shown, but from the heart silently hope that their children can be sensible, healthy and happy ... for the happiness of children, although work to hard, do not complain a word.

You cherish the love of your father. In the future, rely on their own achievements to return his father to express his gratitude to you and your love strong

I learned from Pinocchio to be afraid of the difficulties and face.

This winter vacation, I read one of the world famous book called one thousand one night. It is also called Arabian Nights，This is an ancient book, there are many old stories about people in Arabia.

Once upon a time, there was a king, he married a woman every day, but the next morning the king killed his wife. After three years, he has killed more than one thousand women. Once, the prime minister’s daughter thought of a way to prevent the king’s cruel killing. Then, the girl asked the king to marry her. Every night, she told a wonderful story to the king, and when the king want to kill her, her story was getting into the most exciting part, so the king has to give up. Night after night, the girl told about one thousand one nights, and finally, it affected the king to change his mind about her. This is the origin of one thousand one night.

In this book, there are a lot of very strange story, the story of the fisherman and the devil , fisherman and four-color fish story, the story of Aladdin and the Magic Lamp and so on, some stories tell about the brave spirit of adventure, and some praise people’s brave daring to fight with the evil forces. there are humorous, sad, interesting, horrible, tragic and all sorts of stories.

爱情没有浪漫就失去其美好的色彩了。小说中种.种关于门当户对，以及财富对婚姻的考量却充斥其中。

伊丽莎白为自己家人的行为给自己带来的影响万分懊恼，达西也因此劝宾利先生离开简，后来自己也是在理智与情感较量之后万分矛盾地向伊丽莎白吐露心事。所以说什么是爱情?那种纯粹的感情，爱的不顾一切，单纯的洁白如雪的爱情是不是真如镜中花水中月，是不是只不过是人们心中的美好幻想和追求罢了，而现实生活中人们总是寻找二者之间的最佳平衡点。

伊丽莎白在知道威克姆的真实面目前对其充满好感，她的姨妈却说这样的青年托付终身不会幸福，因为他没有财产没有稳定收入，伊丽莎白接受这样的看法，并且主动克制了自己的感情，呵呵这样并没有给伊丽莎白抹黑，只会让我们看到一个真实理智的伊丽莎白，聪明理智的姑娘。

达西继承祖业，生活无忧无虑，在上流社会里也是受人尊敬，在那样的地位，一切的美德都不为过，慷慨大方，助人为善，这些东西无助与对他形象的丰富，对他倒是没什么评价。

有一个细节的描述很有意思，伊丽莎白和她的舅妈舅舅到彭伯利-达西的庄园去游玩时，不小心遇见达西之后，mr.gardiner和达西先生的交流让伊丽莎白非常满意，她觉得达西应该知道自己的亲戚不都是那种举止让人厌烦的人。这样的心理描述的确很有意思，伊丽莎白已经非常在乎达西的感受了，如果不是的话，她的亲戚如何的糟糕又关达西何事?再者，伊丽莎白是不是也有那么一点的虚荣心呢，这无损她的可爱，反而使她更加可爱!谁不有一点点呢?

在追求爱情的路上，一定要坚定自己的信念，不要因为金钱、名利或其他原因而草草决定，要坚持寻找真爱。如果对方的某些缺点是自己所不能容忍的、而且也是自己所无法改变的话，就应该果断选择放弃;当然也应该要珍视彼此，不要由于别人的一些话就改变自己的决定，幸福要自己去经营。

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.

People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

爱情与婚姻是人类恒久不变的话题，在《傲慢与偏见》里，简·奥斯汀用她理智而诙谐的笔调为我们讲述了五个婚姻故事，阐释了婚姻的真谛：爱情。婚姻应建立在爱情的基础上，而以金钱或者外貌、情欲为目的的婚姻是难以幸福的。而且爱情的建立，必须经过双方深入的了解，抛除虚荣心与偏见，客观的认识对方的品格，只有优秀的品格才能获取爱情。

Love and marriage is a constant topic among human, In Pride And Prejudice, Jane Austen told a story about five marriages for us in her rational and humorous writing tone, which explains the truth of marriage: love. Marriage should be based on love, while it can’t have access to happiness when just based on money or appearance. And a deeper knowledge is needed when we start our affection . Exclude vanity and prejudice, and think about each others moral character objectively, and we can know someone better and more exact---- only good moral character deserves real love.

书中的两对恋人，伊丽莎白和达西，以及简与宾利，他们的婚姻虽然也不排除相貌与家世的考虑，但主要是建立在爱情的基础上。尤其伊丽莎白和达西的爱情故事最为人津津乐道。他们由相互厌恶到最终相爱并且结为连理，此番曲折中，他们逐渐相互了解，解除偏见，抛弃毫无意义的所谓体面，最终认识到并且爱慕上对方的美德。而伊丽莎白对达西的求爱先拒绝后答应，更是展现了她对无爱婚姻的蔑视。相反，伊丽莎白的朋友，夏洛特，她认为自己既不美，又没有钱，出于经济方面的考虑，选择了与愚蠢而又肤浅的柯林斯结合，过上有保障但没有乐趣的婚姻生活。同样，伊丽莎白的妹妹以及父亲的婚姻也是不幸的，他们在美貌的皮相面前昏了头，忽略了对方的品德，导致终生遗憾。

The two pairs lovers in the book, Elizabeth and Darcy, Jane and Bingley, mainly based their marriage on love and excellent moral character, though thinking about looks and family background to small extent. Elizabeth and Darcys love story is most relished especially. During twisting journey from they hated each other to finally fell in love and got married, Elizabeth and Darcy gradually got to know each other, removed prejudice, and discard meaningless so-called face. Eventually they realized and fell in love with the virtues of each other in readers’ expectation and wishes. Furthermore that Elizabeth refused Darcys courtship before accepting, still further show her defiance of marriages without love. On the contrary, Charlotte, Elizabeths friend, who thinks she is not beautiful besides having no money, chose to combine with stupid and shallow Collins out of economic considerations, and lived a ensured but dull marriage life. Similarly, Elizabeths sister, Lydia, as well as her fathers marriage is unfortunate, for they were confused by the beauty of appearance, while ignoring the moral character. They would be bound to regret for their choice all their life .

总而言之，在婚姻面前，我们必须向爱情看齐；在爱情面前，我们必须以人的品德为准；在品德面前，我们必须客观公正。

All in all, we must be for love alignment in the face of marriage; and we must will be subject to moral character in the face of love; and we must be objective and fair in the face of judging the moral character.

To Regain the Nature of Goodness

—— Review of ‘Oliver Twist

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those vermin-to-be to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

The Scarlet Letter attained an immediate and lasting success because it addressed spiritual and moral issues from a uniquely American standpoint. In 1850, adultery was an extremely risqué subject, but because Hawthorne had the support of the New England literary establishment, it passed easily into the realm of appropriate reading. It has been said that this work represents the height of Hawthornes literary genius; dense with terse descriptions. It remains relevant for its philosophical and psychological depth, and continues to be read as a classic tale on a universal theme.[6] Another consideration to note having to do with the books popularity is that it was one of the first mass-produced books in America. Into the mid-nineteenth century, bookbinders of home-grown literature typically hand-made their books and sold them in small quantities. The first mechanized printing of "The Scarlet Letter," 2,500 volumes, sold out immediately, was widely read and discussed to an extent not much experienced in the young country up until that time. Copies of the first edition are often sought by collectors as rare books, and may fetch up to around $6,000 USD.

Let me tell what I feel after reading the great work Jane Erye.I was really move by Jane Erye after closing the book.What a kind and good woman!Mrs Eyre had a heart of gold.She really loved everyone around her,and gave others help sincerely.She respected herself and did her best to do everything.I really love her.She are both a great teacher and a good friend of mine.Sometimes when I am confuse,I will think of her.I will imagine what will she do if she is I.Why not read Jane Erye my friends!

Book Review: “Camille”

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800s, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armands father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armands reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumass last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?