《阿甘正传》观后感英文【热门20篇】

《阿甘正传》是美国好莱坞拍摄的一部著名电影，曾获得1995年奥斯卡最佳影片，《阿甘正传》观后感。本片讲述了一个弱智孩子的成长故事，同时通过阿甘的经历，引出了美国近几十年发生的许多大事，还反映了很多社会现象。

通过观赏这部影片，我明白了四个道理。

第一，生命起伏不断，不要刻意地去改变。人的生命有喜有悲，有苦有乐，只有顺其自然才是真理。如果刻意去修改它，那么你的生命就是残缺的。就像阿甘的母亲所说，人生就像各式各样的朱古力，你不知道你将拿到哪一颗。

第二，当面临绝望时要坚强。阿甘的上司丹中校在战斗中失去了双腿，但是他并没有气馁，坐上轮椅，还是那么的自信、坚强，但是上帝是公平的，它让丹中校失去了双腿，也给了他巨大的财富－ 丹中校成为了阿甘虾船的大副，他们一起捕获很多的虾，成为了百万富翁。

第三，信守承诺。在影片中，阿甘一直扮演着一个愚蠢，又有些可爱的角色，但是他有一个巨大的优点 － 就是信守承诺。他的战友布巴牺牲后，阿甘并没有忘记之前对布巴的承诺 － 共同在海上捕虾。于是阿甘花了一大笔买了一艘虾船，但那时候海上已经有了太多太多的虾船。很多人笑话他，但他毫不在意，坚持自己的原则：傻人做傻事。坚持不懈，最后获得了巨大的成功。

第四，永不气馁。阿甘小时候腿脚有残疾，走路都是一瘸一拐，但后来他居然成为了跑得最快的橄榄球运动员。后来，阿甘遭受了一次感情的打击，他开始跑步，跑出了绿茵镇，跑过了加州，穿越了整个美国，跑到了大洋的彼岸，再折回，跑到了另一个大洋的彼岸，再折回。。。就这样，阿甘一直跑了三年。阿甘毅力激励了无数人，使他们重新充满了对生活的信心。一个从小残疾的儿童，长大后能够做出如此惊人的壮举，这是因为阿甘有坚强的意志，永不气馁的精神。

一根轻盈而洁白的羽毛随着风儿，缓缓地飘落在阿甘的脚下。羽毛纯洁平淡而美丽就象阿甘那平和的心。

好友推荐看《阿甘正传》说我也会为之感动，并要求我要写1000字的观后感，看后的确耐人回味，片中最喜欢阿甘妈妈的一句话：“你必须明白，你和你身边的人一样，你和他们并没有什么不同，没有。”阿甘母亲的这句话，激励着呵甘一步一个脚印地走出了自己的人生奇迹。从智商只有75分而进不了学校 ，直至母亲..才得以上学，到橄榄球健将，到越战英雄，到捕虾船长，到跑遍美国……阿甘以诚实，守信，勇敢和真诚，达到了许多智力健全的人难以企及的高度。

阿甘不是一个出类拔萃的人反而显着有些笨拙，但上天是公平的，令起点不高的人比天生优越感十足的人更早更深地认识到生活中的真实与残酷，幼年的阿甘腿有残疾，于是带上那笨拙的辅助工具，于是同伴们就讥笑、玩弄，还追赶着向阿甘扔石头。为了躲避同伴们的石头。伴着珍妮“阿甘，快跑的喊声”阿甘惊慌，拼命的奔跑跌倒了挣扎着爬起..随着铁架子破裂,最后他奔跑如飞了。那些追打他的同伴们只能眼睁睁的看着而束手无策。凭着惊人的奔跑速度，阿甘跑进了橄榄球队，进了大学并顺利毕业。参加了越战。在越南战场上，部队中了埋伏，在敌机的猛烈轰炸下,部队伤亡惨重,撤退令下，阿甘记起珍妮的嘱咐：“打不过，就跑。”阿甘转头越跑越快。他冲出重围成了唯一幸免的人。但他没有顾及自己的安危而一次次的返回去救出负伤的战友,阿甘的真诚,勇敢和善良让人震惊和感动..

我们常常会抱怨工作生活负担过重，而消极不前，情绪低沉郁闷。阿甘却信念单纯，目标清晰，即使先天不足，可爱的阿甘平常的心视之，并取得了成功。我相信，阿甘这种生活态度和坚强意志，信念才是达到阿甘生命之巅、获得最终辉煌之母。

阿甘有位伟大的母亲，阿甘一生始终如一的爱珍妮，战友巴布对阿甘说“等回了家，我们去铺虾”，阿甘为了实现巴布的遗愿，和失去了双腿的中尉干起自己并不熟悉的捕虾业，也为自己赢得了巨大的财富，可见阿甘是个守信感性的人，在他身上,我们看到了忠诚，守信，执着，友善这些人性中最为优秀可贵的品质,看到了对生命的执着,对生活的希望,做人的真诚，对信念的坚定。阿甘让我们的灵魂受到了洗礼，领悟了人生的意义。

片中经典语句：

妈妈说：你必须明白，你和你身边的人一样，你和他们并没有什么不同，没有。

人生就像一盒巧克力，你永远不知道你会尝到什么味道。

要向前走，就要甩掉过去。死是人生的一个部分。

我只是告诉自己，当我做一件事的时候，我就要尽力去做。

Film Review of Pride and Prejudice

Pride and Prejudice is a famous classic written by Jane Austen. I was attracted by the characters and plots of the film adapted from the novel.

Elizabeth is the heroine of the story. When she meets Darcy, a handsome, rich but arrogant man, on the party for the first time, she is dissatisfied with the proud manner of Darcy. Darcy looks down on those who are in a lower social class,

including Elizabeth. However, after getting to know the courage, independence and confidence of Elizabeth, he almost falls in love with her. But Elizabeth believes the lies of Wickham which causes her great prejudice to Darcy. She rejects Darcy’s propose marriage to protect her self-respect. Finally, Darcy goes away because he couldn’t tolerate Elizabeth’s sisters’ vulgar manners. He writes a long letter to explain his thoughts and love to Elizabeth. After reading it, Elizabeth feels guilty about

misjudging Darcy and regrets turning him down. As time goes away, Darcy gradually improves his pride and keeps helping Elizabeth’s family out from troubles. At last, Elizabeth removes the prejudice to Darcy and accepts his propose marriage.

From the film I learn that we can’t judge a man immediately by the first impression. If we are controlled by our subjective senses, it will easy cause prejudice and

misunderstanding and probably influent the developments of many events. To avoid this situation, we need more communication to understand others deeply by ourselves.

A review of the Pursuit of Happiness

“The Pursuit of Happyness” was released on the 15th of December 2006. It is a dramatic story based on a biography of Chris Gardner’s nearly one-year struggle with homelessness. Directed by Gabrielle Muccino, the film stars Will Smith as Chris Gardner, and co-stars Jaden Smith playing Chris’ son, Christopher Jr. For Will Smith’s performance in the film, he was nominated for an Academy Award and a Golden Globe for Best Actor. The ‘different’ spelling of the title, ‘Happyness’ is seen by Chris Gardner on the building outside the play centre is son attends, which Chris reminds the owners of the building multiple times that it is spelt with an ‘I’.

The film shows us the struggles Chris Gardner has with homelessness. He is bankrupt because he invested his life savings in portable bone-density scanners, which he thought hospitals would be interested in buying, but in the end hardly any doctors wanted one, as they considered it an ‘expensive luxury’. During the struggles, his wife Linda leaves to go to New York and Chris and his son are left in San Francisco with no income and living in a motel. Chris sees interest in become a stockbroker, but to become one he has to go through an internship. Meanwhile, Chris and his son are evicted because they can’t pay rent, and they are forced to go to a homeless shelter, and even one night had to sleep in the bathroom of the underground rail system. During his internship, he never once mentions his financial struggles and at one point he is asked to give one of his bosses 5 dollars for a cab, a sum that he can’t afford. After an intense six months, Chris is taken into the bosses’ office, and is offered a job as a stockbroker, the final scene shows him being in unbelief of the position he was offered and showing his happiness and gratefulness for the opportunity, Chris realises that his financial struggles are over as he now has a job with a regular income.

Christ was unfortunate, for he got a wife who was not understandable at all (though she has her own difficulties) and was in bad luck with his business. But he was very fortunate also, for he got a son who was very thoughtful and, I think, tough life experiences always make a great person. It is said that this movie is inspired by a true story, and I want to say, this movie does inspire me a lot. What impressed me most are: Christ’s wife left him because of life pressure; Christ’s love to his son and Christ’s strong belief towards life. Through these, I know that it is not easy to be a good husband and a good Papa, since in reality, only love cannot only make everything. And I also learn that one has to strongly believe in himself, no matter how difficult the situation is, but of course, hard-working is indispensable.

Can Hollywood, usually creating things for entertainment purposes only, create art? To create something of this nature, a director must approach it in a most meticulous manner, due to the delicacy of the process. Such a daunting task requires an extremely capable artist with an undeniable managerial capacity and an acutely developed awareness of each element of art in their films, the most prominent; music, visuals, script, and acting. These elements, each equally important, must succeed independently, yet still form a harmonious union, because this mixture determines the fate of the artists opus. Though already well known amongst his colleagues for his notable skills at writing and directing, Frank Darabont emerges with his feature film directorial debut, The Shawshank Redemption. Proving himself already a master of the craft, Darabont managed to create one of the most recognizable independent releases in the history of Hollywood. The Shawshank Redemption defines a genre, defies the odds, compels the emotions, and brings an era of artistically influential films back to Hollywood.

The story begins with the trial of a young banker, Andy Dufrense, victimized by circumstantial evidence, resulting in a conviction for the murder of his wife and her lover. After a quick conviction, Andy finds himself serving a life sentence at Shawshank prison, with no hope of parole. He exists in this prison only in appearance, keeping his mind free from the drab walls around him. His ability to do this results in the gaining of respect from his fellow inmates, but most of all from Ellis Redding. Ellis, commonly referred to as Red, finds gainful use of his entrepreneurial spirit within the drab walls of Shawshank by dealing in contraband and commodities rare to the confines of prison. Andys demeanor and undeniable sense of hope causes Red to take a deeper look at himself, and the world around him. Andy proves to Red and the other inmates that in the conventional walls of Shawshank prison convention will find no home in his lifestyle.

By creating the films firm foundation, the meticulously chiseled screenplay paved the way for this films success. Frank Darabont outdoes himself with the phenomenal adaptation of Stephen Kings equally noteworthy novella, Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption. In this novella, King demonstrates that he can break free from the genre he dominates and still create a marvelous piece of modern literature. Though the film mirrors the novella in many ways, Darabont illustrates a focused objective of improving upon the areas where the novella came up short, resulting in one of the best book to film transitions ever.

While maintaining some of the poetic and moving dialogue of the novella, Darabont also proves that a films score can generate a great deal of emotional response from its audience, as dialogue does. He employs the cunning Thomas Newman, son of the legendary Hollywood composer, Alfred Newman. Darabont shows recognition for the films needs by employing Newman, who makes the gentle piano chords whisper softly to the viewer, as if a part of the scripted dialogue. Newman lends himself to individualism and tends to drive more towards the unique in the realm of score composition. His effort in Shawshank did not go unnoticed, as his score received an Oscar nomination in 1995. While unique and independent, Newmans score never once intrudes on your concentration or distracts from the film.

With work from vast array of talented scene designers, costume designers, composers, cinematographers, and various other Hollywood artists, the cast of The Shawshank Redemption had a strong foundation to work with. The marvelous cast of this film will dazzle you with some of the most convincing performances you will witness in a film. While both Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman shine as Andy and Red, respectively, the true spectacle of acting lies within the plethora of amazing supporting actors who easily disappear into their roles. Most noticeable of these, the veteran film star James Whitmore, who portrays the elderly Brooks Hatlen. Brooks, a man incarcerated for an unmentioned crime for so long that he finds himself attached to the Shawshank and the daily life he has lead. Each of these actors show a true dedication to their art, and a focused purpose in their motivations, creating a convincing setting that never once caters to anything unbelievable.

With all of the aesthetic touches and attention to cinematic detail, the most beautiful part of the film lies within its thematic material, such as its focus on the human desires for the most abstract concepts, like hope and freedom. These themes, which concern things the human spirit undoubtedly yearns for, seem so intricately woven into the plot that it easily draws its audience in to its story. Though full of hardened criminals, your heart will go out to these men as they display the most basic of human emotions, and deliver some of the most quotable lines in a film to date. Like a great novel, this film manages to succeed at greater things than simply entertaining an audience. Darabont tells his story most masterfully, illustrating principles and inspiring his audience to think. He leaves us a poignant film with a powerful message of hope, and redemption, something we all seek.

This film manages to redeem Hollywood in the eyes of people who feared it long lost in a dark sea of clichés and predictability. Darabont shows us that artists still work in the Hollywood studios and production facilities. These artists show their capability to produce art; real art that inspires you to look at the deeper aspects of life and the world around you. The Shawshank Redemption delivers much-needed breath of fresh air for anyone who realizes the capability of film. It proves that masters of the craft still live on this earth, and still bless us with timeless masterpieces that we will never forget.

“I’m not a smart man ,but I now what love is.”

是的，剧中能触动到我灵魂深处的并不是傻傻阿甘通过努力获得了多少的成就和荣兴，而是电影里第一百零八分钟当阿甘问珍妮的时候，这一句“I’m not a smart man ,but I now what loveis.”就那么的平铺直述,让我想就这么着了吧，对! 就是这一句，

把人的荣誉团队的荣誉甚至是一个国家的荣誉一遍一遍颁发给一位智力仅75的成年男人阿甘身上 ??多么讽刺啊??!的确，限入自满状态下年轻的老的灵魂统统被这不朽的阿甘讽刺到了。似乎是一件神奇的事情。但通过电影，阿甘做到了。轻轻地，如随风飘舞的羽毛般，他用75的智力嘲笑着当下社会的人。是啊，75的智力的确不够，不够他去恨，不够他去埋怨，不够他去攀比，没得选择，于是他只能去爱，用他全部的智力去爱，爱珍妮，爱他的妈妈，爱朋友，爱上司，哪怕是说他傻子、讨厌他、打他的人，因为他的智力让他永远也学不会怎样去恨、去算计，包括了他后天能跑的双腿，意外能打乒乓的双手，甚至于被枪击中的屁股，他是爱自己的，他也在乎自己所拥有的，哪怕是披荆斩棘，乘风破浪，哪怕是雨水太阳和星辰，他只知道如何爱，

而爱是世界上最伟大的力量，爱使人打开了心扉，平息了愤怒，化解了仇恨，安抚了孤独，振作了绝望 ，坚持了目标 总之， 爱的力量太强大了，就像太阳能溶化了冰川一样，就像傻阿甘跑进大学，被破格碌取，被历任总统接见，被代表着国家荣誉一样，是不可思议的。爱是人人都在向往和追求的精神领域，而物质社会却常常让人因为文字的精辟而忽略了内容的深沉。。于是在电影中的阿甘用爱表达一切时，世界都向他低了头。

智者说“行为的状态大多时候是通过精神或思想过滤后表现的”。是我们，太聪明了，知道什么叫好与不好，知道什么叫妒忌，知道什么叫欲望，什么叫膨胀，什么叫聪明，可我们知道得太多了，占用了自己智力太多的百分比，而爱就望尘莫及。所以，好多人向世界低了头，因为怎么也学不够爱的艺术。喜欢阿甘是他因为不如好多人聪明却取得中此非凡成就与财富吗?哈哈，，，我更清楚的知道我才没有他那么傻。。

只有充满爱 才能获得新生。

Everyone knows that Meryl Streep is the high priestess of drama, but she never gets enough credit for her comedy skills. That should change with The Devil Wears Prada, a sinfully funny, deliciously glossy take on the 2003 best seller by Lauren Weisberger, who denies writing it as a poison-pen letter to her former boss, Vogue editor Anna Wintour. The names have been changed, of course, to ward off lawsuits. Stepping up to the plate as imperious fashion editor Miranda Priestly, Streep knocks every laugh out of the park. More remarkably, she humanizes a character who was little more than a bitch in Manolos on the page.

Streep teams up hilariously with Anne Hathaway as Andy Sachs, the "smart fat girl" (shes a mere size 6) who applies for the job as Mirandas junior assistant at Runway magazine. Andy, a journalism major at Northwestern, had her eye on The New Yorker, but is told that if she can run the gantlet of Miranda for a year, there is no publishing Everest she cant climb. Before you can say "makeover,"Andy is transformed from a gawky giraffe into a swan who can trade up in lovers -- from sweet chef (Adrian Grenier) to literary stud (Simon Baker) -- and from cotton blends to chicest of Valentino, Chanel, Donna Karan, Bill Blass, Galliano and Prada. Guys who know squat about labels can take pleasure in the uberbabes wearing the threads.

Director David Frankel makes expert use of the light touch he brought to HBOs Entourage and Sex and the City. And screenwriter Aline Brosh McKenna leeches out the books malice in favor of wicked sass. Does the movie bite the fashion hand that feeds it? You bet. But it also pays due respect to the artful details turning the wheels of an industry that only seems frivolous. Theres no doubt Andy learns much from watching Miranda at work, even with all the insults and fools errands. The script tries to paint Miranda into a corner -- the lonely careerist who cant keep a husband or find personal happiness -- but Streep wont wallow in the cliches of victimhood. In a party of a movie, her performance is a comic and dramatic tour de force. comic and dramatic tour de force.

Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS. He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank thats the meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to foretime and dont stay in-place. Although so many people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing, Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life, complaining that A Gan shouldnt save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gans help. The movie is intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportunity to ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if only there is perseverance.

When I first saw The Truman Show I came out of the theatre amazed. This is your first clue that you are watching something different from your normal Jim Carrey movie. I love the dialogue, camera shot, performances, direction, music, and running time of this movie. There is nothing I would do to change it. I came away from The Truman Show feeling inspired which is the goal of good filmmaking Jim Carrey was outstanding as Truman, underplaying him, not making him too comic or too dramatic, but giving true sincerity when asked. He deserved an Oscar nomination. Ed Harris has always been a good actor, but in this movie hes a great actor. He plays Christof with such arrogance and bullheadedness that you dont know whether hes helping or destroying Truman. He and the director, Peter Weir, deserved their Oscar nods.

Weir, who directed the great Witness, uses different camera angles to make you feel like youre actually watching The Truman Show and not a movie. He ends it before you get tired of the concept and helped Carrey and Harris give immaculate performances. Andrew Niccol script is a real star in the movie too because of its inventiveness and ingenuity. Overall, The Truman Show is what I like to call a true American classic.

The Terminal is a good film that is funny, entertaining and deals with some good ol fashioned drama situations. It felt very much like a documentary at times, maybe due to the fact its based on a true story from the 1980s, but that didnt retract from the enjoyment factor. To say its a story all about the trials and tribulations of just one man is perhaps a little too shallower way to sum it up but at certain times, you do wonder if the films going anywhere. Such it is that the film DOES contain a few laughable moments adding to its comedy tag.

These come at certain intervals and everything in-between is just filla. So there are some good, comic moments but in my opinion, there arent as many funny parts to make you laugh all the way through. The film deals with slapstick humour in parts such as slipping over a wet floor or walking into a window. Its those sort of moments that do sort of distract from the film slightly.

Some of the stories within the film also feel generally annoying in the sense of the point of them being there. The film was supposed to be about one man (Hanks) I thought, NOT solely about anyone else and so I was rather surprised to see the little story about the food/cafeteria delivery worker attempting to get one of the other airport workers to fall in love with him. Things like that were flawed and distracted from the actual film. As I said before, that particular story line acted as a filla; a way of upping the film length and it was disappointing.

Hanks acting is good and although his accent was terribly annoying early on, I managed to adjust accordingly and with stand it all the way through. The character Gupta is also rather amusing; using the simple concept of forcing people to slip up on his own polished floor merely for his amusement was rather odd- odd but funny none-the-less. Zeta-Jones character and performance was also tolerable. She wasnt in the film much I didnt notice but its a good feeling when you realize Hanks has someone to really relate to as you stat to feel as if your feeling sorry for Hanks if you get into it too much and the acting from Zeta- Jones is some relief at least.

All in all I think youll enjoy The Terminal if youre the patient type. Its got a bit of humour, a bit of tragedy, a hint of romance and some moments where youll really feel good for the characters as they finally get what they want after the last half an hour or so was probably built up to will it/they or wont it/they not to mention the film itself on Hanks struggle with staying in the airport.

其实我看过很多遍这部影片了，每一次看总能或多或少有点收获。但是，在3月30日晚上在教学楼1310再一次观看这部影片后，我感觉收获的东西更多了。

影片以一片羽毛的飘落为影片的开始，以前我不太懂，但这次我感觉到了，这片羽毛的飘落不正是如同一个降落人间的生命，当这片羽毛在天空中飞行，经过高楼、树、汽车等，你不知道它要去哪里，会落在哪里，这不恰恰说明了人这一生如同羽毛的飘落一样都是未知数吗？最后这片羽毛飘落到了阿甘的脚下，开始了阿甘着传奇的一生。

阿甘生下来智商只有75，但他的母亲为了他以后的生活，于是想办法把他送进了正常人的学校。如同小时候的我们一样，总有坏孩子欺负人，阿甘也是常常受欺负，这时一辈子他喜欢的告诉他，跑。于是，他跑了起来，甩掉了追赶他的人，越跑越快，跑进了大学，跑成了橄榄明星，民族英雄，国会勋章获得者，乒乓球明星，百万富翁。

同样和阿甘命运（阿甘的智商缺陷）差不多的丹上尉（越战中失去了双腿）却总是抱怨生活，抱怨老天，甚至抱怨阿甘救了他，没有和他祖辈一样成为烈士，而是一个没有双腿的怪人。但是抱怨了半天，他改变了什么？没有，一点都没改变，丹上尉依旧过得天天喝酒买醉的生活，可见生活不会因为你无休止的抱怨改变。但是，后来他看见执着的阿甘为了完成好朋友巴布成为捕虾船长遗愿而忙碌的时候，他第一次被阿甘深深地感染了，决定和阿甘一起捕虾，正是这个改变，成就了丹上尉成为了百万富翁、娶了个漂亮老婆。我想，丹上尉如果仍然像以前一样抱怨生活的话，他永远不会成功。

影片又以一片羽毛结束，这或许是一种结束吧，对阿甘传奇人生画上了一个句点，但我猜想，它未尝不是一个开始，一个小阿甘的开始。

以上就是我对这部影片的个人看法，由于本人实力有限，肯定有写的不恰当、不完整的地方，还望老师给与指教。

初恋50 First Dates

What would it feel if I can wake up everyday forgetting what happened for the last whole year?

Lucy in the movie “50 First Dates” told me this feeling. Every morning when she woke up, she only rememberred the Sunday of last year which was her father’s birthday, also the date she had the car accident which made her only keep memory before Sunday, so she always felt happy living the same habit as what she did on Sunday a year ago with the kind set-up by her father and brother. After meeting Hey, she could only remember who he was on the same day. But after one night, he became a stranger to her. She couldn’t even recognize he was the one she used to date and love everyday. Hey tried his best to give her a new different meeting every day so as to win her smile and regain their “First Date”. Hey made her tapes every morning to help her remember what happened the day before and the last whole year. Lucy thus felt grateful with all she had when she woke up everyday. On the same day, she always had the same deep gratitude to face Hey with her sweet smile. What a beautiful feeling it is to always feel thanksgiving and to always

appreciate each other’s effort. A touching story between a memory lost woman and a devoted man taught all of us, normal people, the essence of love. When two people can thank each other for their devotion everyday like what they did for each other on first date, love can forever be refreshed and energetic. On Lucy’s side, people with memory will ask for more than yesterday and become critical of their partners day by day, while people without memory will feel grateful for their life and the people around them everyday.

In the movie, when one day Lucy decided to break up with Hey to let him rebuild his life by burning all their diaries and tapes, I cried for Hey’s broken heart. For her, it was just one day feeling. For him, it was long-term affection and connection. It was easier for her than him to give up their love. On Hey’s side, people with memory will always remember the past happiness and

treasure it for the rest of their life, while people without memory will easily give up at the end of the same day.

What a ruthless feeling it is to end a relationship just after one minute thought. People with fragile mind would easily ruin a long-term relationship no matter what reason they have. The torture between Lucy and Hey tells us the fatal factor to do harm to intimacy between a couple is their fragile mind of

balancing emotion and reason. Thus most of couple lose their trust for each other after experiencing this weakly testing broke-up.

飓风Taken

What is the right relationship between the father and the daughter? There is no certain answer. But the love of Brains to his daughter must be one of the best ones.

His daughter, a young pretty 17-year-old girl was kidnapped during a tour in Paris. Brain got the news and hurried to France to take his daughter. He found that the gangsters that kidnapped his daughter were connected with an old friend which made him exetreme angry. He finally found the place where was holding an auction selling young virgins and broke in successfully taking his daughter away.

No matter how hard and stressful the situation was, and how dangerous things he faced, he never went back just because of the greatest love of a simple father. In the movie, we are all moved not only his actions of kindness, but also his insistance and the greatest of all- a fathers love.

魔术师THE ILLUSIONIST FACTS

When word of the famed Eisenheims (Ed Norton) illusions reaches Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell), the ruler attends one of the magicians shows in order to debunk the performance. But when the princes intended, Sophie von Teschen (Jessica Biel), assists the magician onstage, Eisenheim and Sophie recognize each other from their childhoods, and pretty soon theyre totally hot for each other. As the clandestine romance continues, the princes best cop (Paul Giamatti) is charged with exposing Eisenheim, even while the magician gains a devoted and vocal public following. Before long, Sophie turns up dead, and the logical suspect is Eisenheim himself.

一线声机"Cellular" has the setup for a solid straight-ahead thriller: A kidnap victim who does not know where she is being held phones a total stranger who must then stay connected on his cell phone to find her before she is killed. Joel Schumacher scored earlier with a similarly phone-themed Larry Cohen story, "Phone Booth." As executed by tone-deaf director David R. Ellis, however, "Cellular" becomes an unintentionally hilarious cousin to Brian de Palmas "Raising Cain" and "Snake Eyes."

Ellis seems to have unwittingly spliced together two different films with

mismatched tones: Kim Basinger as the kidnapee and Jason Statham as the kidnapper occupy the deadly-serious, straight-to-video thriller half, while Chris Evans as the rescuer and William H. Macy as a police officer seem to be in a "Saturday Night Live"-alum action comedy. Nowhere else is the disjointedness in tone more apparent than when Basinger and Evanss performances are placed side-by-side during their conversations: The scenes keep cutting between an overwrought Basinger wringing out every drop of melodrama, while a blissfully inept Evans seems to be channeling a cross between Chris Kattan/Jimmy Fallon and Ben Affleck/Keanu Reeves.

Meanwhile, Ellis pulls out tricks intended to generate thrills and surprises. He throws in out-of-nowhere "shocks," a la "Final Destination"; he throws in

flashbacks; he throws in a gun-blazing Macy in Jerry Bruckheimer action-hero slo-mo; and yet, Ellis has no handle on staging any of them competently. Case in point: "Cellular" is the proud owner of one of the most ineptly scored chase sequences ever, as if Ellis simply heard a snippet of the songs lyrics ("...where you gonna run to?") literally and paid no attention to the inappropriateness of the accompanying music (which just bop, bop, bops along). (The song is even reprised during the closing credits, which itself is misbegotten in conception.)

And yet, for all of its failures as art, "Cellular" is always entertaining for those very same faults

只要今天够努力，幸福明天就会来临。

这是一个根据黑人投资专家Chris Gardner的传记性图书《The pursuit of happyness》这一真实的故事改编的电影主人公克里斯·加德纳的成长过程并没有父亲的陪伴，28岁才第一次见到父亲。于是当他也做了父亲的时候，他发誓要做一个称职的好爸爸。然而天不遂愿，这位单身父亲屡遇不顺，遭遇失业等不幸，和年幼的儿子相依为命、流离失所。为了儿子的幸福，加德纳咬紧牙关重新振作，处处向机会敲门，并毛遂自荐进入一家证券公司工作，从最底层的员工做起。终于皇天不负苦心人，他最后成为知名的金融投资家。之后，他慷慨解囊，热心捐助公益活动，成为全美知名的慈善人物。而过程中支持他咬紧牙关的最大动力，除了宝贝儿子外，就是他始终相信：只要今天够努力，幸福明天就会来临。

幸福从那里来?当一个人屡屡遇到不幸的时候，你是否坚持了你的梦想，你是否为了幸福而坚持不懈了呢?

影片开始时克里斯·加德纳在人潮涌动大街上迷失在一张张笑脸中茫然地伫立“为什么人人都快乐，我却不能这样呢”。片尾当克里斯·加德纳通过试用再次来到那里时，他为自己鼓掌振臂。

你要幸福，那就去追求。

Harry Potter is a series of seven fantasy novels written by British author J. K. Rowling. The books chronicle the adventures of the eponymous adolescent wizard Harry Potter, together with Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, his best friends. The central story arc concerns Harrys struggle against the evil wizard Lord Voldemort, who killed Harrys parents in his quest to conquer the wizarding world, after which he seeks to subjugate the Muggle (non-magical) world to his rule.

阿甘正传是部励志的电影。阿甘小时候是名双脚不利索，智商低得儿童。一直被其他孩子欺负，只有珍妮真心对她好。也正是珍妮让他的双脚施展出了才华。

阿甘并不聪明，或许正是他的不智慧才会让他一生有如此的成就吧。他重视亲情、友情、爱情。对于现在的社会，正是在呼吁我们对情感的重视，在这部影片中，我最崇敬的便是阿甘的母亲。虽然作为一名单身母亲，但她还是认真细心正确的养育着阿甘。何况阿甘是一名“特殊”的孩子。

面对着阿甘的“特殊”，阿甘母亲还是把他当正常的孩子养育，让他上正规学校，叫他如何面对现实。她正是展现了母爱的伟大……现实中，更是有那么多的母亲为自己的孩子付出了一切，让我们感动流泪。感谢父母对我们的养育、栽培!

本影片在没有冰河时代那种有搞笑和赏心悦目也没有那种惊奇的搞怪夸张幻想在里面，只是很似人的故事情感的塑造了一个人物的思想和被改变到最后的为了救罗素和kevin和查尔斯的战斗让故事有了一个很好的体现人的性情和理想愿望等。他在为了完成心爱人的愿望将他们的房子放到天堂瀑布不懈努力坚强执着一定要将这件事做完而放弃了kevin被查尔斯抓走而为了房子放弃营救，看出他心里情绪是多么在乎他妻子的愿望不为过之后，看了妻子留给他的……而想通。之后他在回想到与罗素、kevin和狗的生活，这些让他感受到了朋友的重要。他就马上行动去救罗素。他就把所有房子里的东西让自己……在有失去房子他那时的心里和最后罗素坐在房子旁数车的色彩，说明人物已经从过去的悲伤中走了出来，这里可以体现整部片子的人物生活性情的改变，说明我们现实也许要……

Gua Sha is a movie about the differences between American and Chinese culture. Xu datong is a video games designer in St. Louis. When his father visits from China, he performs Gua Sha (a Chinese traditional treatment) on his grandson, which leaves bright red marks on the skin and causes a lawsuit of child abuse. In the court, Datong loses his mind so that finally he loses custody of his son. I think this scene is shocking and thought-provoking to most of the Chinese audiences. But the most impressing scene to me is the ending. Datong wants to see his son in Christmas eve, he has to climb a pipe to the ninth floor which his son lives. I think the pipe is not only a pipe, but also a gap, a deep gap between American and 5000-year Chinese culture. He wants to climb over the gap and he will never succeed, perhaps no Chinese people really could succeed.

It’s about assimilation into American culture, and not assimilation in an “International” city, like SF or NY or LA or Chicago, but St. Louis, MO (actually shot there). Really great acting, interesting story.

Gua Sha is a treatment in traditional oriental medicine in which a wooden board repeatedly slides across the patient’s acupuncture acupressure massage points. It works in similar principles like that of acupuncture acupressure massage. This method would inevitably leave bruise on the skin, and the story begins here, when the visiting grandpa who does not speak any English used this traditional practice to treat the grandson when both son and daughter-in-law were at work.

Sadly, in US, this is a story that repeats itself many times in the area where many oriental immigrants lives and all of these are due to simple misunderstanding between cultures.Gua Sha: Step-by-Step, by Arya Nielsen.If an acupuncturist is trained in Classical Chinese medicine, they will do this technique in their practice for pain, and for acute or chronic illness.

人生就像各种各样的朱古力，你永远不会知道那一块属于你。”阿甘母亲的这一理解，向我们阐明了：每一个人的生命轨迹都是存在，而且是独一无二的

阿甘，正是听着这样的教诲，一步一个脚印地踩出属于自己的生活的奇迹。从智商只有75分而不得不进入特殊学校，到橄榄球健将，到越战英雄，到虾船船长，到跑遍美国，阿甘以先天缺陷的身躯，达到了许多智力健全的人也许终其一生也难以企及的高度。

在影片的开头和结尾你都会看到：在广阔的蓝天下，一根轻盈而洁白的羽毛从天而降，缓缓地降落在阿甘的脚下。这其实是影片在暗示：这个世界上，如果有人把生命看得像羽毛般纯洁，平淡而美丽，那么，这个人一定是阿甘。

阿甘天生就注定不是一个出类拔萃的人。但上天又是如此公平，往往，它会令起点不高的人比天生优越感十足的人更早，更深刻地认识到生活的真实。幼年的阿甘腿有残疾，阿甘的母亲不得不为儿子套上一个笨重的铁架子，以辅助行走。放学后，同伴们在路上讥笑他，玩弄他，追赶着扔石头。女同学珍妮喊道：“阿甘，快跑。”阿甘惊慌，拔腿就想跑，跌倒了挣扎着爬起。渐渐地，铁架子不在束缚着他，他奔跑如飞。同伴们追不上他，眼睁睁的束手无策。这是阿甘人生中的第一个奇迹。

跑得快真是好世界。凭着惊人的奔跑速度，阿甘进了橄榄球队，以后又进了大学并最终顺利毕业。不久，他参加了越战。在越南战场上，阿甘的部队中了埋伏，一声撤退令下，阿甘记起珍妮的嘱咐：“打不过，就跑。”阿甘于是转头就跑。他成了唯一幸免的人。看到这里，观众大概都会发笑。阿甘如果不是跑得快，就不可能后来返回去救出负伤的战友;阿甘如果不回去拯救战友，那么阿甘也就不是阿甘了。

阿甘因战功显赫而受到总统接见。这是导演为我们准备的一幕喜剧，但我们却不会为此而觉得夸张，可笑。有的人常感觉生活负担过重，面前困难重重，因此整天垂头丧气，郁郁不欢。阿甘的信念这样的单纯，目标这样的清晰，即便先天不足，前有穷山恶水，他也以平常心视之，并最终一一跨过，这并不是说愚人之福，保持这种态度和意志的人，信念能减轻他许多关于生命的重负，而使他达到生命之巅。

阿甘一生中只有一种爱支撑人生，那就是母爱;阿甘一生只爱一个女孩珍妮，除此他永远心如止水;他可以为了纪念死去的战友布巴，而干起自己并不熟悉的捕虾业(仅仅是由于布巴的一句话)。。。。。。在生命的每一个阶段，阿甘的心中只有一个目标在指引着他，他也只为此而踏实地，不懈地，坚定地奋斗，直到目标的完成，新的目标的出现。没有单纯的抉择就不会没有心灵的杂念;而没有心灵杂念的人，大概才能够在人生中举重苦轻。

阿甘的一生中出现了许多奇迹，但这些奇迹没有、也绝不会引导你去羡慕他，你只会欣赏和阿甘一起的那些岁月、生命和历史，体味个中的苦甜，以期“跨越缺陷，完美人生”

还是一贯的梦工场的高水准，画面精致细腻，人物生动传神，故事情节曲折动人，最重要的是它以最简单易解的方式说明白了一个道理，那就是——世界上没有任何捷径和秘籍，唯一的制胜法门就是相信自己。

不想再说更多的剧情，因为它真的很出色。看的过程中，频频出现人们会意的笑声，整个氛围相当的轻松和惬意。这个片子做得非常地道，一点儿也没有是由西方人演绎的感觉，不论是故事还是其中传达的意境，不论是画面还是其中的细节，都是东方式的;唯一特别的可能就是出现的现代的口语，比如ok之类的。

上帝在给你关闭着一扇门的同时，也一定给你打开了另一扇门，说不定，走过另一扇门风景会更好。——题记

《阿甘正传》讲述了主人公福雷斯·甘从幼年到少年再到青年的成长经历，他从人人口中口娘养的傻瓜成为一名真正的成功人士。听老师说，这部电影当时上映时曾在世界上引起了巨大的轰动，通过观看这部电影，改变了我很多的想法。

主人公阿甘的一生充满传奇色彩，他为人善良、讲义气、信守承诺，也正因为他的这些优良品质，他收获了友情、爱情和荣誉。从珍妮到布巴再到丹中尉等，阿甘与他们都成了生死之交。虽然阿甘天生腿不好，总带着一股傻气，但他凭借着自己的坚毅、努力，逐渐超越了自我，创造了奇迹。他从跑步到踢足球，到参军、打乒乓球，再到捕虾，一直都有所建树。最后，他获得了多个荣誉，成为了百万富翁，也与他从小的好朋友珍妮结为了夫妻，并有了自己可爱的孩子。

观看这部影片，使我明白了：不管做什么事，都要做好自己该做的，并坚决不做自己不该做的；不要瞧不起任何人，更不要认为某个人傻。因为我们永远不知道将要发生什么，将要面对什么，就像电影中阿甘说的那样：“只有做傻事的人才是傻”，看起来傻的人说不定就是运气最好、最精明的人。

所以，我们要正确对待每一个人，学会宽容，学会坚持，学会专一，学会讲诚信，学会做自己该做的事，只有这样，我们才能成为一个有作为的人。

Hope is the whole theme of the movie.

Before Andy went into the Shaw shank, the topic here is nothing but metamorphosis, fighting or killing time. Confusion, dirty, fear, despair gathered together to create a harsh environment. The prisoners have no human rights at all. They are free to sell the warden their cheap labor. After Andy’ coming, although this unwilling banker can not change the oppression and abuse of prisoners, he at least brought hope, a breath of life, even liberty. This hope is different from the verbal warden said, "I am the light of the world. I would not have you follow the dark" because he is a downright "false Christ" by the name of Christ. He is just a matter of the devils trip. His brutal disposition is to let the prisoners succumbed to "discipline and the Bible", and even "Want you to eat you eat, want you to pee you pee ". Everyone in Shaw shank is institutionalized, resulting in the death of the Brooks, leading to Red’s still having no rights and intendance to bring the" instructions "of the brand, losing hope that his life will not always be like a normal person. The warden is precisely to completely obliterate the hope of Shaw shank prisoners for the future.

“The Shaw shank Redemption” is successful and impressing in the territory of moralizing audiences. All virtuous quality of every role make us happy from the bottom of our hearts., Moreover, the background music in company with the plot also delight us at the same time. To sum up, it is not only a movie, but also a flawless display directing us to freedom and goodness.

It is the first time that I have watched “The Shaw shank Redemption”, which is said to be one of the most meaningful movies in the world. At the beginning of the movie, I felt embarrassed about the sexual scene. Then, with the plot developing, I found that this is a movie almost all actors of which are female. However, it is still full of warmth and touch. I indulged in it at once.

I am moved by Andy’s willing self-punishment. He knew he is innocent, but he was actually sorry for that he dismissed his wife and didn’t give her enough love and care, which led to her death indirectly. Therefore, he undertook the seventeen-year experience in jail without any complaints. It is a behavior out of redemption, which is magnanimous in fact.

At the same time, the negative roles also impress me a lot. The warden is so greedy and vicious that he compels Andy to assist him in wealth accumulation and tax evasion, otherwise Andy would be violated by a bunch of gays. And the guard was extremely selfish and cruel. He can punish any prisoner in any way at any time without a guilty conscience. The most common punishment is brawl. There’ no need worrying about taking responsibility of the prisoners’ death. For another thing, prisoners do not dare and have no access to sue them/ For another, they can make up the causes of their death to cover the truth. The prisoners’ lives are actually in their hand. To some extent, they are like some governors.

Why does it impress me a lot? Firstly, it is institutionalizing which wrecks humanity. In the prison, no doubt that Red lives a relatively easy life, and also, he is very wise. He can meet anyone’s needs. He knows the nature of the life in the prison clearly. He said to Andy, “Hope is dangerous”, which is intellectual man’s tongue. In real life, people will say, "Red is very seasoned" and so on. But, as these so-called "wise men", Red had never thought of fighting, let alone influencing or changing others. He just conforms to the rules in order to protect himself. He doesn’t change until Andy’s appearance, which eventually leads him to the freedom.

Brooks, of course, the librarians, is another most shocking role. His whole life is a profound reflection of the "institutionalized" servants life. Brooks spent a lifetime in the prison. After he was finally released on parole, got free, and left the familiar surroundings, familiar people, he felt loss of his value, and he can not find his place. He had the freedom of the body but in fact, his soul had been strangled. The world belonging to him has been compressed to a minimum. Eventually he can only choose to end his life. Why should arrange such a role as Brooks? I think the director is trying to tell us, if Andy doesn’t appear, the vast majority of prisoners, including Red, can be Brookes in the near future. Isn’t Brooks like too many people in real life?

Andy imparted other prisoners some useful knowledge, which created a positive atmosphere. That went a long way in their redemption. That is to say, Andy’s atonement had a great impact on others and made them feel regretful sincerely. Just as Red put it, It takes a strong man to save himself, and a great man to save another. Andy is great.