成功需要勤奋英语(经典20篇)

星期六是中秋节，晚上，我回到家，抬头眺望天空，黑乎乎的一大片，连颗星星也没有。我多么渴望看见那在天空中闪闪发亮的星星和又大又圆的月亮呀!

我等着，盼着!

到了晚上十一点，路上的行人似乎也没有了，我呆呆地看着天空，心里非常失望，就走开了。等我洗好澡，再一次拉开窗帘布时，我得到了个意外的惊喜。

我大声叫爸爸妈妈：“爸爸妈妈、爸爸妈妈，快过来呀，我发现了那个又大又圆又亮的白玉盘了!”

爸爸妈妈跑过来了，也惊呼道：“真的呀，那又大又圆的月亮正挂在空中呢!”

可是，在月亮的旁边总是有许多烦人的乌云，一会儿就把月亮遮住，我那时就在想，月亮为什么就不会把乌云给“踢”开呢?

那月亮白里透亮，犹如一颗颗珍珠做起来的白玉盘，月亮走到哪里，哪里的云就亮堂堂，月亮那五彩环隐隐约约地把那些云变成了“五彩云”。多么美丽的夜空呀!

有几颗星星在月亮姐姐旁边玩耍，它们一个个眨着顽皮的小眼睛，在月亮金黄的光芒的照耀下，也变成了金黄色的了!

多么美的深夜呀!如此的美的夜让我久久不想去睡觉，可是，那眼皮子怎么也不听我的话，不知不觉的就自己合上，然后不知不觉得进入了梦乡。

站在成功的大门前，懒者未进先怕，妄自菲薄：“我真的没有希望了……”

站在成功的大门前，庸者悲叹命苦，生不逢时：“命运为何如此不公平，我为何没有机会，我为何不幸运……”

为何如此？你们怎么知道自己没有希望？怎么知道自己没有机会？我要大声疾呼：成功来自勤奋！

鲁迅先生曾说国，伟大的成绩和辛勤的劳动是成正比例的，有一分劳动就有一分收获，日积月累，从少到多，奇迹就可以创造出来。综观古今中外，有哪一个为人取得的成就不是勤奋刻苦的。

结果呢？明末医学家李时珍如不花整整27年的时间去跋山涉水，风餐露宿，“访采四方”，“搜罗百代”，就不能写成巨著《本草纲目》;陈景润如不夜以继日地演算，就不可能摘下数学王冠上的明珠;居里夫人如不顽强苦战四个春秋，不从400吨沥青、200吨化学药品和800吨水之中耐心地一点一滴地分离，一次一次地测量，就揭不开镭的奥秘;巴尔扎克如不每天用十六七小时如痴如狂地拼劲奋笔疾书，就不可能留下为人们所深深喜爱的巨著《人间喜剧》……够了，够了，不必多举例了，这些事例难道还不足以证明“成功来自勤奋”这一道理吗？

是啊，成功来自勤奋，成功在与勤奋，智慧不是自然的恩赐，而是勤奋的结果。只有把握住勤奋的钥匙，才能打开知识宝库的大门。

“勤奋补拙是良训，一分辛劳一分才。”因此，每一个有志于造福人类的人，都必须勤奋学习，勇于攀登。眼下，改革的大潮正冲击着我们这个文明古国的各个角落，摆在我们面前的是一条充满诱惑却又极富挑战性的路，在条路上，我们只有不懒惰，不胆怯，脚踏实地，勤奋刻苦，才能取得辉煌的成果。

同学们，让我们扬起生活的风帆，用勤奋去攀登指挥的峰巅，用知识的金砖敲开成功的大门吧！把自己火红的青春，献给光辉灿烂的明天！

[成功在于勤奋作文5篇

成长是需要磨练的。小时，刚开始学走路的时候，总摔跤，但是也因为了摔跤使我学会了走路；上小学的时候，因为刚开始的时候不用功，成绩不好，但是也因为那次的成绩使我发愤用功，让自己变成了优等生；上了中学，参加竞选，因为人缘不好，落选了，但是也因为那次的失败，使我注意到应当与同学融洽相处，在第二次的竞选中我成功了。由此，我得到这样一条经验：成长需要磨练。如果没有当初的摔跤，我可能现在都不会走路；如果没有当初的成绩，我可能现在还是一个差生；如果没有当初的落选，我现在还是一个自以为是,眼里没有他人的人

一粒沙砾进入蚌壳后，由于不停的磨练最终才变成一颗璀璨夺目的珍珠。只有不断的磨练，磨去各种棱棱角角，这样才能使自己变得更加圆润。

朋友当我们面对挫折的时候，不要灰心你大可以把它看做是一次磨练，阳光总在风雨后

成长需要磨练。

[成功需要磨练小学生作文

othing Succeeds Without a Strong Will

“Where there is a will, there is way” is an old proverb which almost everyone knows, but not all understand it so well. Actually, it means that if you are really resolved to do something, no matter how difficult it might be, never give up.

In fact, strong will is a kind of good quality which successful people should own. A great man is always one who has a firm resolution and an inflexible spirit. One will never succeed all his life without a firm will to get the final victory. As a rule, great tasks are accomplished by men of strong will. For example, Dr. Sun Yatsen, the founder of the Republic of China, set the Chinese people free from the Manchurian rule through a long period of hard struggle. Many of his attempts failed and many of his followers were killed, but he had an inflexible spirit and stuck to his cause. Finally, he made the revolution of 1911 a success. The same is true of men in all walks of life.

It is quite obvious that there is nothing difficult in the world, if you make up your mind to do it, you will certainly accomplish your end. That stands to reason. So as for students like us, we should have a good attitude towards failure. Facing with difficulties and failures, keep heads up and never give up. Besides, we should make full preparation, though strong will help us overcome the difficulties, it is not for person who has no preparation.

[以成功为话题的英语作文4篇

勤奋，是学习的根本。没有了勤奋，就算在聪明，也不可能有大的成就。

我国着名的数学家华罗庚就是一个很好的例子。你可能会想，华罗庚能有那么大的成就，肯定在名牌大学上学。而这样想你就错了。华罗庚只读过初中，根本没上过大学。它的成功靠的是勤奋、刻苦地自学。

华罗庚原来也很调皮、贪玩，但他很有数学才能，经常在课上回答出许多同龄人不会的数学题。

可是，这么有才能的一个聪明的孩子却在念完初中时失学了。家中贫穷，没有办法供他上学。此后，他回到了家里，在自家的小杂货店做生意，卖点香烟、针线之类的东西，替父亲挑起了养活全家的担子。

然而，在华罗庚的心中依然放不下数学，依然酷爱数学。不能上学，就自己想办法学。一次，他向一位老师接来了几本数学书，一看，便着了魔。从此他一边做生意一边算账，一边学数学有时看书入了神，连客人都忘了招呼。傍晚，店铺关门以后，他更是一心一意的在数学王国里漫游。一年到头，几乎每一天都要花出十几个小时，来钻研数学，有时，甚至连觉都不睡了。还有的时候，睡到半夜，想起一到数学难题的解法他准会翻身起床，点亮小油灯，把解法记下来。

而后来，他却患上了伤寒病，经过半年的治疗，总算活了下来，但左脚却终生残疾了。而华罗庚并没有因为病痛而停止对数学的研究，他躺在床上，写出了许多着名的数学定理。在不懈的勤奋下，他终于成为了举世闻名的数学家。

不只华罗庚，还有牛顿、苏布清俄等许多着名的科学家、数学家、文学家，都是靠只勤奋获得成功的。从现在开始，我们就应像他们一样勤奋学习，为将来的成就做准备!

As the saying goes, "brothers, satisfy broken heart." A mans strength is too small, only have cooperation, can achieve. Man is standing in the far out at sea coast mast-head can have a ship, the need to promote, One mountain is in the far east has whose shimmering rays of the sun, need a set, One of the force is restless in its mothers womb, the maturation of maternal infant to nourish.

Cooperation is the path to success to mark. Danish astronomer with 30 years DiGu observation of the planet, precision accumulated extensive accurate and reliable information. But no good theoretical thinking and scientific arrangement, not a great discovery. Before his death DiGu will material to assistant Kepler, and told him the material preparation. DiGu accurate observation and the profound study of Kepler, combining finally leads the movement of the planets of the three laws of motion of the object, uncover secret. Without cooperation, the three laws of motion to the planet?

Cooperation is spread to the foundation of success. Many of the warring states period, and Lin xiangrus WanBiGuiZhao nov.1992, WangChongYong zhao zhao4 guo2s prime minister, as when lian Po old general prided himself on that very defy spirit, and everywhere. Lin xiangrus for the countrys interests to lian Po old rivalry everywhere. General In the old general understand Lin xiangrus on the original, very ashamed, personally to prime minister mansion QingZui auxiliary thorns. In dealing with national affairs of their cooperation, make an increasingly, JiangXiangHe as historical legacy. Without cooperation, which come national prosperity?

The train is bound for successful cooperation. In 1935, MAO zedong not before the zunyi meeting presided over the job. By chance, the influence of socialist left the situation is very difficult, forced march. The long march in zunyi meeting, held in zhou enlai, and WangJiaXiang insistence, established MAO zedong in the partys leadership, the new army under the leadership of the CPC in MAO zedong, seeking truth from facts, solidarity and cooperation, the battle is one by one. Since then, the communist party of China, the ideal ship across the narrow waterway, light avenue. Without cooperation, which to historic transition?

BC, chu, zhao 318, wei, Korea, yan five components of the coalition against aggression, qin, however, due to the heart, want to own interests, not very good cooperation, resulting in failure. If at all in the world cooperate, concentrated force, material and financial resources, is certain to beat the qin dynasty. Say so, with cooperation, can achieve.

Let the flower of success in the cooperation in the soil in the spring, the cooperation in the spring, let the success of spewing eagles flying in the sky in the cooperation. Let us have cooperation, hug success!

译文:

拥有合作，才能拥抱成功

俗话说“兄弟一心，齐力断金，有关合作的英语作文，作文素材《有关合作的英语作文》。”一个人的力量太小，只有拥有合作，才能拥抱成功。一人之力是站在海岸遥望海中已经看得见桅杆尖头了的一只航船，需要风浪的推动；一人之力是立于高山之巅远看东方已经光芒四射喷薄欲出的一轮朝日，需要朝霞的映衬；一人之力是躁动于母腹中的快要成熟了的婴儿，需要母体的滋养。

合作是通向成功的指向标。丹麦天文学家第谷用30年时间精密观察行星的位置，积累了大量精确可靠的资料。但不善于理论思维和科学整理，未能有重大发现。临终前第谷将资料交给助手开普勒，并告诫他按这些资料编制星表。第谷的精确观察和开普勒的深刻研究相结合，终于引出行星运动三大定律的发现，揭开天体运动的秘密。没有合作，哪来行星运动三大定律？

合作是铺向成功的基石。战国时期的蔺相如多次立功，并使完璧归赵，被赵王重用，担任赵国宰相时，廉颇老将军居功自傲，十分不服气，并处处刁难。蔺相如为了国家的利益，对廉颇老将军处处相让。在廉颇老将军明白了蔺相如的初衷后，非常惭愧，亲自到宰相府辅荆请罪。他们在处理国家事务中精诚合作，使赵国日渐兴旺，将相和被传为历史佳话。没有合作，哪来国家兴旺？

合作是开往成功的列车。1935年遵义会议前，不主持中央工作。受左倾机会主义的影响，红军的处境非常艰难，被迫长征。红军在长征途中召开了遵义会议，在周恩来、张闻天和王稼祥的坚持下，确立了在全党全军的领导地位，新的党中央在的领导下，实事求是、团结一致、精诚合作，红军的胜仗是一个接着一个。从此，中国共产党的理想航船，跨越过了最为狭窄的航道，驶向光明大道。没有合作，哪来历史性转折？

公元前318年，楚、赵、魏、韩、燕五国组成联军抗击秦国的侵略，但是，由于人心不齐，只想自己的眼前利益，不能很好的合作，导致失败。若各国在当时精诚合作，集中各国的兵力、物力和财力，是一定能够打败秦国的。所以说，拥有合作，才能拥抱成功。

让成功之花在合作的土壤里盛开，让成功的清泉在合作的泉眼中喷涌，让成功的山鹰在合作的蓝天中翱翔。让我们拥有合作，拥抱成功吧！

[英语作文：拥有合作，才能拥抱成功

人的一生短暂而又漫长，其生活历程更不平坦 ，虽然人人都希望时时顺利，

但这是不可能的。无论什么职业做什么事的人，每个人都会在生活、学习或工作中遇到各种各样的困难和挫折。观察许多名人的成功之路，我们不难发现，他们都是从挫折中磨砺出来的。

有这样的一个故事，在美国有一个人，他二十一岁时，做生意失败;二十三岁时，角逐州议员落选;二十四岁时，做生意再度失败;二十六岁时，伴侣去世;二十七岁时，一度精神崩溃;三十四岁时角逐联邦众议员落选;三十六岁时，角逐联邦众议员再度螺旋;四十五岁时，角逐联邦参议员落选;四十七岁时，提名副总统落选;四十九岁时，角逐联邦参议员再度落选;然而，就是这样一个屡战屡败的人，在他五十二岁时，他终于获得了成功，当上了美国第十六任总统!

这个人就是林肯。作总统的林肯有着如此坎坷的路途，作为世界闻名的大文豪马克·吐温也同样有着不凡的人生。他曾经经过商，做过打字生意，办过出版公司，结果亏了30万美元，但他没有就此颓废，而是鼓起勇气，振作精神重新走创作之路。他很快摆脱了失败的痛苦，利用自己的天赋开辟了文学创作中一片属于自己的天地。

通过这两个故事，我想你一定会明白了成功是需要坚韧的毅力和非凡的勇气的。一个人经历一些挫折并不是坏事情，“自古雄才多磨难，从来纨跨少伟男。”在我们成长的道路上，有坦途，也有坎坷;有鲜花，也有荆棘。在你伸手摘去美丽的鲜花时，荆棘同时会刺伤你的手。如果因为怕痛，就不愿意伸手，那么对于这种人来说，再美丽的鲜花也是可望而不可及的。

成功永远属于挑战失败的人。人的一生要经历许多的挫折和考验，在我们前进的道路上只要有勇气、有胆识有智慧就一定能够战胜荆棘，即便是弄得遍体鳞伤，至少也可以证明了“我能行”，我是勇敢者。

勤奋是通向成功的必经路。每个人都应该勤奋。

爱因斯坦曾经说过：“成功等于百分之九十九的勤奋加百分之一的灵感。”这句话是说，无论天资如何聪颖，没有勤奋，是无法成功的。古今中外的事实都证明：勤奋是成功的钥匙

晋代大书法家王羲之的儿子王献之，幼年时就开始练习书法。他自幼刻苦练习，对学习书法如痴如醉。王羲之十分看好这个儿子，觉得王献之能成大器。果然，王献之没有辜负父亲的期望，刻苦习字，在写完了家中“十八大缸水”后，他的书法技艺终于入木三分，成长为一个书法大家。试想，没有经过“十八大缸水”的刻苦练习，王献之就是再有书法的天资，也成不了书法家。

我国古代的著名天文学家张衡也曾经说过：“人生在勤，不索何获。”我认为，张衡的这句话正是说只要努力了、勤奋了，即使没有达到预期的目的，自己也别气馁，因为勤奋本来就应该是我们每一个人的一种生活态度。是庸庸碌碌、无所作为地度过一生，还是勤奋刻苦、多长本事、做一个对社会有贡献的一个人？这个答案不言自明。

我们现在每一个人都处在学知识、长本领、打基础的阶段。古人言，少壮不努力，老大徒伤悲。汉朝时的朱买臣，小时候因家境贫寒，为了维持生活，他每天都得上山砍柴，可他好学不倦，常常背着柴火，一边走一边看书学习，最终成为了国家的丞相。

居里夫人为了得到纯净的放射性元素，在一个破棚子里夜以继日的工作了四年，忍受着各种元素对他们身体的刺激。为了体验镭的生理效应，他们还不止一次被镭射线烫伤。她的勤奋使她一生两次获得诺贝尔奖。

现在我们的条件要比居里、朱买臣好得多，然而好的条件并没有让我们更加勤奋，反而是更加慵懒。勤奋正是现在人所缺的一种品质。如果我们也能像前辈们一样勤奋，那世界上一定会有更多成功的人。

愿我们勤奋努力，获取通向成功之门的钥匙。

许多人都会问我认为成功最需要什么,我会毫不犹豫的说:“是自信，一个人连自信都没了，他怎么还能成功呢？”自信，顾名思义，就是自己对自己有信心，每件成功的事背后，都少不了自信。

记得那是前一段时间发生的一件事，我在家里做奥赛题，可那道题特别难，我算了好几遍都没算出来，我想这道题我肯定算不出来，正准备看书上答案时，又一想，我这不是自己对自己失去信心吗？我这不是自己放弃自己吗？成功的 背后需要自信和汗水，相信自己，我一定能行！又过了一会，经过冥思苦想，终于把这到题做出来了。

是啊！成功不是靠投机取巧，成功不是靠花言巧语，成功靠的是自信和辛苦的汗水呀！

两个人比赛，一个对自己充满信心，心里想的我能行！我一定能赢，另一个人对自己不抱希望，心里想着我如果输了该怎么办？你们说，他们两个谁能赢？答案是肯定的：第一个人一定赢，因为他对自己充满信心！

自信是成功的第一步，也是最重要的一步，如果这一步你走不好，那你将永远与成功擦肩而过！

[有关于成功需要自信作文

比尔盖茨的成功激发了无数人的梦想，几乎有那么一段日子，无数人以他为榜样，无数人以他为偶像，疯狂的追求，似乎只要有天赋，有无数的努力，付出和汗水，下一刻，谁都可以成为世界首富。实则不然，盖茨的光芒太大，几乎遮住了他的家世。他的成功的确是自己无数的努力换来的，但这之中不乏有他家人的帮助。盖茨从哈弗辍学时曾遭到家人的强烈反对，他的家人质问他：“你凭什么在这个世界上生存下来，就凭你是哈福大学的辍学生?”而盖茨的回答更加有力，他说：“就凭我爸爸是名律师，妈妈是哈弗大学的董事长，难道这还不够吗?”

如果说盖茨已经有些遥远了，那么郭敬明确实为不少人所熟知，他由作品《幻城》出名，而后又发表诸多大作，发展成自己的企业，如今资产过亿，而他，也是富二代。

说这些，并无贬斥之意，也不是对富二代的偏见，毕竟成功都和自身的努力分不开，富二代也可以是拼二代。只是想说，纵然努力可以和天赋可以给以成功和财富，但许多外在的因素也是很重要的，能够年纪轻轻便一步登天的人毕竟是少数。除了天赋和努力，我们还应该要有耐心和长远的眼光。

成功需要等待。

人的一生不可能是一帆风顺的，必定会遇到许多次的困难与失败。当我们遭遇这些人生的必修课时，是选择放弃呢?还是坚持呢? The life of a person cannot be smooth sailing, and he will encounter many difficulties and failures.When we encounter these compulsory courses of life, do we choose to give up? Or do we persist?

那是一个周末的早晨，太阳公公用一束束金光唤醒了我，我轻轻地用手揉了揉迷糊的眼睛，忽然间想起了昨天妈妈对我的交待：“进进，明天妈妈单位忙，没有时间回来了!你要一个人在家啦!”“妈妈，你不要担心，安心工作!我长大了，会照顾好自己!”

说干就干!好好照顾自己，怎么可能让自己饿肚子呢?这就来煎几个荷包蛋来当早餐。

先学着妈妈的样子，在平底锅里倒入少许油，再拿来一枚蛋往锅沿一敲，“哎呀!”力道重了些，蛋壳连着蛋液一起流到了锅里。顿时锅里发出“嚓嚓”声，油不停地往外溅!一眨眼的功夫锅里乌黑一片，面目全非了!煎个蛋怎么这么难?搞得我都打算放弃了!就在这时，叶老师经常鼓励我的话语又萦绕在我耳边：“倪进，做任何事都要坚持!遇到困难时要勇于面对，只要你肯动脑，办法总比困难多!”

想到这里，我又鼓足勇气再试一次。先把锅里的油热一下，用手在表面感觉一下，发现油热了赶紧把火调小。拿来一枚蛋不轻也不重地往锅沿边一敲，蛋清伴着蛋黄流进了锅里。不一会儿，看着鸡蛋边缘微微地变黄了就翻个身，接下来，我又做了几个。我看着胜利的成果，心里开心极了!拿来手机给妈妈发了一通短信：“妈妈，您上班辛苦了!回来给你加餐!”

这真是一次成功的尝试!我发现这次尝试后的成功让我无比的幸福，心情是无比的激动!通过尝试，我才发现生活是如此地美好。更重要的是妈妈眼中的小宝贝长大了!

曾经多少次面对学习感到彷惶，曾经多少次感到前途一片迷茫，曾经多少次写作文时感到束手无策。如今作文是语文考试的重中之重，要想把作文写好唯一的选择就是——读书

因为只有多读书才有更多的路可以走。

自从我读书，使我对我的人生又有了新的希望;自从我读书以后，让我又有了新的梦想，而我决定用我这张满羽毛的翅膀来展翅翱翔，飞向我朝思暮想的清华大学。我的未来不是梦……每当这首歌在我耳边响起，我多么渴望着句话能用在我身上。

多读书，好读书，读好书。读书，必须理解你读这本书的内涵，不要一味的去死记硬背，应找到窍门。在这日新月异的社会，没文化什么事也干不了。眼看我就要升入初中了，而我的作文却仍然有病句。现在我参加了兴趣小组，每个星期可以去两次图书室，每次去的时候都带着之前准备的笔、本，把好词好句记到上面，等到写作文是用上，他会对你的文章大有帮助。千万不要是到用时方很少。

我通过读书看到作者经常把诗句写到作文中。像少壮不努力，老大徒伤悲;一寸光阴一寸金，寸金难买寸光阴;三更灯火五更鸡，正是男儿读书时……这些诗句就是教导我们要珍惜时间，勤奋努力。

窗前明月光，疑是地上霜;明月几时有，把酒问青天;峨眉山月半轮秋，影入平羌江水流;人有悲欢离合，月有阴晴圆缺……这些诗都是写月亮的。

这么多的诗句，它的意思不读书怎能知道，不读书，又怎能把作文写好?

每天晚上躺在床上，望着这灰暗的墙壁，我碾转反侧，总感觉有个鬼魂在瞪着我。就连上厕所都不敢去。忽然，一道光线从窗户的缝里射到了床上。我猛然坐起，仰望天空，只见天空中挂着一轮毫不起眼残月。仔细观察，我发现其实残月也很美，有了残月的陪伴使我渐渐进入了梦乡，在梦里我迷路了，是残月给我照路，指引我方向。从中我明白了：“我们不能小瞧任何一个不起眼的东西，即使是蚂蚁，他们联合起来也能把大堤击垮。所以说我们不能放过任何一本书，即使是一本破书，一本小书，或者也带我们走向成功的道路。

游说过：“纸上得来终觉浅，绝知此事要躬行”这句诗的意思是：“光从书本上得来的东西总还是浅薄，需要亲自去实践才能搞个明白，所以我们要敢于实践。

朱熹说过：“问渠那得清如许，为有源头活水来。”这句诗的意思是河里的水之所以这么清澈，是因为有源源不断的胡说从源头流来。这首诗就是要我们要多吸取知识，多读书，这要才能懂更多的道理。

陆游还说过：“死去元知万事空，但悲不见九州同。王师北定中原日，家祭无忘告乃翁。”这首诗是陆游临死前做的。写了他为看不到祖国统一而感到悲哀。他让孩子们等到祖国统一时，千万不要忘了告诉他。

我送同学们一句话：“只有那些曾抱住几块脆弱的木板，在狂风暴雨里颠簸的人，才会体会到一个晴朗的天空是那么可贵。”

伟大的发明家爱迪生曾经说过：“天才是由一分的灵感和九十九分的汗水组成。”的确，我们在站在平地上仰望那些巨人泰斗时，何曾想过，他们也曾与我们站在同一位置，不同的是他们找到了通往成功的阶梯——勤奋。

勤奋，是成功之门的钥匙。哪里有勤奋，哪里就有成功。孙敏苏秦若不是悬梁刺股，日夜苦读，怎能学问大增?祖狄刘琨闻若不是闻鸡起舞，勤练剑法，怎能成其报效国家之才?匡衡若不是凿壁借光，刻苦读书，怎能成为一代名家?王羲之若不是勤奋练字，“墨池”为证，怎能以著名书法家之名酬勤?

反之，失去勤奋，成功亦会远离。南朝诗人江淹，文思敏捷，才艺过人，被世人称为“妙笔生花”可是他仅仅陶醉在别人的赞许中，整日优哉游哉，最后文笔枯竭，只落得个江郎才尽的下场。够了，够了，不要再多举了。成功在于勤奋的道理不胜枚举了。

凡事勤则易，凡事惰则难。 现实和理想，一个在脚下，一个在心中;一个实在，一个浪漫;一个把握现实，一个展望未来。只要你肯勤奋刻苦，你的理想就会变为现实。勤奋是火，点燃理想之灯;勤奋是灯，照亮人生之路;勤奋是路，引导我们走向成才的明天!既然成才的航船要以勤奋为风帆，就让我们升起勤奋之帆，去乘风破浪吧!

我们是草，渺小的草，但是我渴望拥有花的美丽。这个世界上许许多多的案例告诉我们，每一棵草都会开花，只有这棵草足够努力。 We are grass, small grass, but I long for the beauty of the flower.Many cases in this world tell us that every grass will bloom, and only this grass is working hard.

诗人艾青曾这样描写礁石的形象：“一个浪，一个浪，无休止地扑过来，每个浪都扑在礁石的脚下，被打成碎片，它的身上、脸上到处都是伤痕，但它依然挺立在那儿，含着微笑，面对海洋。”希望我们是诗人艾青笔下的礁石。人生的道路坎坎坷坷，曲曲折折，但只要具备了礁石的勇气和精神，就一定能够成功。身残志坚的张海迪不是说过吗?“即使翅膀断了，心也要飞翔。”作为健全人，我们难道不更应该拥有这种意志和毅力吗?

成功犹如一束灿烂的阳光，风雨就是每个成功人士都必须经历的一些挫折、困难……成功人士的背后，谁不是经历无数的挫折、困难，谁不是受过磨难的呢?

世界闻名的伟大的发明家——爱迪生，他之所以闻名世界，是因为他付出过无数的汗水，受到过许许多多的挫折才得来的。他发明了电灯丝，也是他经过无数次的实验、研究得来的。他失败过，但他从不气馁，而是吸取教训，一而再、再而三地反复实验，最后终于成功了。他不就是经历了风雨才得阳光的吗?

失败了，别泄气，因为我们还很年轻，其实，跌倒了也不要怕，因为我们拥有世界上最珍贵的两样东西：青春和健康。别再为一次的跌倒而对生活失去信心，别碌碌无为耗费令人羡慕的资本——青春，牢牢把握住青春吧!“盛年不再来，一日难再晨。及时当勉励，岁月不待人。”只要奋斗过、追求过、拼搏过，即使失败也无怨无悔。请记住，最后成功的往往不一定是最有才华的人，而是能够忍耐、懂得克制和从不轻易放弃的人。所以，我们失败后需要的不只是聪明，更重要的是那种甘愿重新再来的傻劲!

每一棵草都会开花，前面阻挡我们的小小失败算什么，我们要相信，失败并不可怕，只有当我们直面失败，战胜失败，我们才能迎来胜利的曙光。那个时候，我们一定会绽放出最美的花朵!

古人云：“一生之计在于勤。”那么，勤奋在我们的生活中又有怎样重要的作用呢？唐宋八大家之首韩愈曾经说过：“业精于勤而荒于嬉，行成于思而毁于随。”由此可见，勤奋，是成功的基石。

“头悬梁锥刺股”的故事，众所周知。战国时苏秦，夜间读书，苦心钻研；困倦欲睡时，就用锥子刺自己的大腿，使头脑清醒。汉代孙敬好学，读书时用绳子把头发系再放梁上，以防止打瞌睡，以督促自己努力攻读。苏秦和孙敬都通过勤奋刻苦的学习，成就了一番事业。“书山有路”，“学海无涯”，而通向成功的最佳途径便是“以勤为径”，“以苦作舟”了。

元代王冕，出生农家，小时候帮人家放牛、干杂活。有一天，他借到一本早就想看的书，但白天在寺院干活，忙的喘不过气，所以只好在晚上读书。可是没有钱买油灯于是他每天晚上在佛殿的长明灯下读书。后来，他成了元代著名的画家、诗人。王冕的成功，不正是来自于长明灯下的勤奋苦读吗？正所谓“聪明出于勤奋，天才出于积累。”成功与勤奋的确是分不开的。

古希腊德摩斯梯尼，希望成为雄辩家，但口吃严重。于是，他勤奋锻炼。为了使舌头灵活，他甚至口含小石子练习朗读……最终，他成为了著名的雄辩家。“勤能补拙是良训，一分辛苦一分才。”无论我们天资如何，或聪或敏，或昏或庸，只要愿意付出辛勤的汗水，收获，总会是有的。

“伟大的成就总是与辛勤的劳动成正比的。”这是鲁迅的一句话。这句话，铿锵有力。没错，成就是与劳动成正比的。付出多少，就收获多少。只要我们前进了，成功就离我们更近了一步。

颜真卿曾经说过；“黑发不知勤学早，白首方悔读书时。”趁现在满头青丝尚未泛白，让我们努力学习，用勤奋开拓成功之路。因为，勤奋，是成功的基石。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

我想，每个人一定体验过成功的喜悦和失败的沮丧，当然，我也不例外，那件刻苦铭心的事，记载着我成功时的喜悦心情！

我现在在学电子琴，已经六级了，前面的几次考级我都顺利通过，所以，我对自己的琴技很有信心。听熊老师讲，南昌市马上要举行才艺预赛，通过就可以参加江西省比赛。听熊老师这么一说，我们几个一起学琴的小伙伴十分兴奋，想到可以参加南昌市比赛，而且通过了还能在江西省比赛，就特别高兴。比赛前几个星期，我们天天刻苦练琴，夏日的炎热没有把我们赶出家门，屋外孩子们的嘻闹声失去了往日的吸引力。

功夫不负有心人，我们的曲子一天比一天弹得熟练，到最后，都能把曲子背下来了。我左盼右盼，终于盼到了比赛这一天，我们穿戴一样的衣服，兴致勃勃地来到比赛的地方。参加比赛的人还真不少，有不少人利用赛前一点时间还在练习呢！看到这一切，刚才还很高兴的我，一下子变得紧张起来。随着参赛的人一个接一个的上台演奏，我的心更加怦怦的跳个不停。终于轮到我们上场了，我们演奏的是《梁祝》，我努力让自己镇静了下来，一个个优美的音符从我的手指头中跳出来，评委被我们的琴声吸引住了，给了我们很高的分数，我们顺利通过了预赛，我们沉浸在无比喜悦中。在江西省的比赛中，我们表现出色，获得了金奖！我再一次尝到了成功时的喜悦。

成功永远属于努力拼搏、不怕艰辛的人，不信你去试试吧！

如果不出意外，我们的人生将会长达几十年甚至一百年之久。日子每天都是一样的丰富或单一，但这完全取决于每个人的经历。就好比，人们每天都有可能出现的错误。

有人说：一失足成千古恨。此话流传了百年，令许多人都感同身受。但我觉得，其实并不。每个人都会犯错，错误时人们与生俱来的行为之一，和生来会眨眼，会哭会笑是一个道理。当然，并没有任何人想犯错。然而我们要做的，不是在“失足”后让自己恨，让别人恨，而应该站起来认识到自己为什么会“失足”而不再摔第二次。

在五年级的数学模拟考中，碰巧我吃坏了肚子。整整一个多小时的心神不宁让这次的成绩没有出乎意料的差。本来我很平静，因为此时已经为自己找好了一大堆的理由，尽管我自己也知道在自欺欺人。本想着模拟考并不被重视，一回到家却被母亲堵了个正着，本想老实坦白，话到嘴边却成了一串胡编乱造的数字，和我的成绩实在差太远。等到母亲半信半疑地找出试卷时，她的脸也犹如暴风雨般乌云密布。

静默了许久，母亲终于开口，但她第一句话并不是“为什么考那么差”而是“为什么要骗我?”“怕您生气。”我坦白。母亲并没有接话，而是指着我卷子上一道错题，看着我的眼睛问道：“这道题是怎么回事?”“考试的时候粗心..肚子也不舒服....”可母亲打断了我的话，重复了一遍刚才的问题。我低下头，小声地吐出两个字：“错了。”“那错了应该怎么办?”“我下次不会再错了...”我的话被母亲再一次打断，母亲笑着摆摆手：“错了，应该改正。把错误的改成正确的。而不是以更多的错误去掩盖一个本微不足道的小错误。错误人人都有，但学会去寻觅正确的，并不是人人都行，所以有的人才会重新站起来，而不是一错再错。”

人，应该从错误中学习正确，而不应以“一失足成千古恨”来遮掩你寻找正确的方向。

曾经有个科学家说过：“成功是要有百分之一上午天赋加上百分之九十九的努力换来的!” Once a scientist said: "Success is one percent of the morning talent plus 99 percent efforts!"

在我认为成功就是：“刻苦+勤劳+奋斗=成功。”只要有理想，就要努力，刻苦奋斗才会换来成功的果实。……

即使你没有天赋也可以用努力换来，因为有句谚语说得好!：“笨鸟先飞，早入林。”

科学家要制造宇宙飞船，如：神舟五号、六号，都是要通过一次一次的实验，反反复复的思考，该如何来设计，该如何来安装系统……才取得成功。

没有失败哪来的成功!

也比如说：作家，写文章一样，一部要拿去拍成电视剧的剧本，如果文章材料(题材)选得不好，不能过编剧这一关，就必须要重写。作家也是反反复复，日复一日的这样写。最后才能成功的。作家还有一定的时间限制。如果在规定的时间内，不能写出剧本，就不能写出受视效果最高的剧本，就不能成为一名实力派作家。

所以，成功是来之不易的。

这也像我做数学题一样。一道难题考住我了我的思维，那我必须要结合以前的知识去思考，努力的想，才会想出答案来。才能把这到题做出来。

当然，成功是要看过程，不能单单只看一个结果。那如果我做数学题时，只写一个正确答案在那，说不出我的思考过程，那老是会说我的答案是抄下来的呢!

所以，我还认为成功是看过程，而不是看结果。

我从小就开始学习画画，从幼儿的初级班，慢慢的升到初中的高级班，其中的那个中级班，就是我的学画过程。我还几得当开始学习的时候，老师叫画一个苹果，红红的，大大的，可我却把那个红红的、大大的苹果画成了扁扁的、小小的“红鸡蛋”了。

可我经过来势的教导，一次次的画，反反复复的修改，一连就画了二三十个苹果，当我画到五十遍时，我才终于画好了一个像摸像样的苹果来。中级班正是美术的一个阶段，如果中级班没学好，那以后美术的成才之路你将一无所有。所以，我为了给以后打下良好的基础，我拼命的画，一练就是十多张。那就一个字：“苦”。可实际我相信“十年寒窗中状元——先苦后甜。”

成功不会向你招手，也不会向你开启成功的大门，只有你自己努力，才能走向成功……

当今社会，想要成功就必须努力向上，无论是事业有成的商人还是赫赫有名的学者，人们只会看到他么成功时的喜悦，可是是会注意他们艰辛的汗水呢，作文一名中学生，努力向上是必备的品质。

努力向上我把它理解为，小草在砖缝里发芽生长，翠绿的仙人掌在干涸的沙漠里汲水生长，一个正在学步的孩子对到后再爬起，我们在生活中努力学习。但是谁是生活中最美的人呢，是懂得努力向上的人，它们拥有最顽强的意志和永不言败的精神，比如说，那失去双腿的张海迪，他努力向上才成为残疾人心中的天使;双目失明的大作家奥斯特洛夫斯基，他疾病缠身，但仍然不失去对生活的勇气和对写作的乐趣，愤然将自己的经历写成了钢铁是怎样炼成的，还有失聪的音乐家贝多芬他奏响了生命的奇迹。

现实中这样的人还有很多很多，但我们只是最普通的人，我们就像明亮的星空里最微弱的恒星，我们更要努力向上，才会给祖国和中华民族带来新的希望。

2016年高考即将要来临了，以下是一篇高考作文预测，标题为：成功需要勇于创新，包含了范文和作文点评，供大家学习参考!

阅读下面的材料，按照要求写一篇不少于800字的作文(60分)

浙江义乌小商品是中国乃至世界小商品批发零售的集散地。2015年01月14日，小商品城的业主们，向中央文明办买断了“中国梦年画”的全部版权，目前已有123家企业获得授权，涵盖了1400种商品。将其印制在小商品上。

成功需要勇于创新

世界最大的小商品零售和批发集散地。浙江义乌小商品城经营者们，买断中国梦漫画的版权，将其印制在自己小商品上。这一新颖独特精美的包装设计，深受世界儿童和大人们喜爱，使得印有“中国梦”的小商品漂洋过海，销量数倍增长。从这一举动不难看出，本来平凡无奇的小商品，只要加以创新，就会收到意想不到的结果。可见，成功需要勇于创新。

成功，不能一成不变。成功需要不断地创新。早在战国时期，商鞅就提出“重农抑商”政策，这有利于当时建立和维护以农业为主的封建专制国家，因而，这条规则被历代君王沿用。可是这条规则到了后来，给中国带来了什么?由于重农抑商，抑制了中国资本主义萌芽的发展，让社会迟迟不能向前推进，中国始终还是一个农业国。而西方的商业如此发达，最终，我们也没有挡住外商的进入，昔日的“天朝上国”逐渐被西方兴起的资本主义工业国甩在了身后。因此说，发展需要变革，发展需要创新，创新需要的是勇气。

成功，要换位思考。就是将自己看做别人，再用别人的眼光看问题。二战时期，美国的蒙格利特将军，别出心裁的将对手的照片摆放在自己的办公桌上，别人对他这种有违常理的做法迷惑不解。将军却说：“我摆放敌人的照片，时常把自己想象成是敌人，想象如果我是他，下一步会怎样做。”正是由于蒙格利特将军非常规地换位思考，让他取得了许多次战役的漂亮胜利。由此可见，换位思考，站在对方角度揣摩自己，这是聪明的举动，智者的行为。

成功，要永不止步。

成功的人是没有止步的，这个过程结束了，下一个又开始了。他本是个木匠，靠着自学，成为画家，荣获世界和平奖。然而，面对已经取得的成功，他永不满足，而是不断汲取历代名画家的长处，改变自己作品的风格。他60岁以后的画，明显地不同于60岁以前。70岁以后，他的画风又变了一次。80岁以后，他的画的风格再度变化。这个人就是齐白石。据说，他的一生，曾五易画风。正因为白石老人在成功后仍然马不停蹄，所以他晚年的作品比早期的作品更为成熟，形成独特的流派与风格。将原用高温处理的金属，改用冷水处理，可以延长其使用寿命;将原本发射上天的火箭，改造为钻井火箭，减小施工难度……通过这样多的成功事例，我们可以看到，勇于向传统规则挑战，打破陈规，会不断取得进步发展。所以说，成功人士是没有止步的。

成功需要勇于创新，但创新不能一成不变;成功需要换位思考;成功需要永不止步，才能做出更大的贡献。所以说，只有探索创新，敢于打破常规，我们才能不断走上成功之路啊!

【作文点评】

1.题目《成功需要勇于创新》比较精准地揭示材料和文章的中心。拟题准确、字数标准。

2.开篇引述材料，简要论述，得出结论，即提出中心论点。语言简捷快速入境，是良好开头。

3.中间三段运用递进式、并列式的论述结构，思路清晰=提出分论点+引述+阐述+结论。

4.结尾总结上文，收束全篇，首尾照应，展示美好的未来。这样的结尾语言简捷干练。