我需要勇气用英语怎么说【20篇】

生活需要勇气

悬崖峭壁上，一棵松树茁壮生长着。没有谁来施肥，没有谁来浇灌，可它依然快乐的生长着。尽管只有贫瘠的土壤，少的可怜的雨水，它依旧顽强的把根扎进岩石缝里，用根紧紧地抱住岩石，凭着勇气克服重重困难，努力地生长着。它是如此珍惜生命，尽管长得并不茂盛，但从不放弃一点儿生存的机会！它的这种毅力和勇气怎能不令我敬佩？我们人类也应该这样，遇到任何困难都要勇敢地面对，只要我们努力地去做，再大的挫折都不怕。

张怡宁，中国乒乓新的女领军人物，她的夺冠之路并非一帆风顺。从1999年到2003年她多次在重大赛事上，连连失利，这些挫折曾使她产生放弃打球的念头，但也正是这些挫折使她越来越清楚的认识到：&ldqu;当技术水平达到一定的高度之后，比赛就不仅是技术更是在比心理！&rdqu;张怡宁正是凭借着勇于面对挫折的勇气，才取得今天的成绩。

可见，在生活中处处都需要勇气。生活就像一望无际的大海，大风大浪总是难免的。每当暴风雨来临时，勇敢的水手满怀生存的勇气，不管风浪多么可怕，他总能坚持下去，最终得以平安归来；而怯懦的水手，早在真正可怕的暴风雨到来之前，就失去了生存的勇气，其航海之旅往往以失败告终。

大家可还记得，在汶川大地震中，有许多的幸存者们都被废墟给掩埋了。可是，他们却凭着顽强的毅力活了下来。是什么让他们有这么大的毅力？是勇气！是勇气让他们如此勇敢的面对死神，是勇气让他们创造了一个又一个的生命奇迹！大家不会忘记，那个&ldqu;可乐男孩&rdqu;的一句&ldqu;叔叔，我要喝可乐&rdqu;，逗乐了整个为这场大灾难而感到悲伤的中国；敬礼男孩的一个敬礼，体现出了人们面对灾难的的勇气。正是这种勇气，鼓励着人们与死神一争高低，坚强的活下去！

可是在生活中，有些人一遇到困难就会逃避。前段时间曾在报纸上看到，有一个大学生，家里很穷，国家帮助他上了大学，但他在学校因受了一点小小的挫折就跳楼自杀了。面对一点挫折，他怎么就那么懦弱，不热爱生命呢？不是有句话说&ldqu;不经历风雨，怎能见彩虹&rdqu;吗！所以说，不管遇到什么事，我们都应该勇敢地去面对，要有生活的勇气。

人生之路曲曲折折，难免遇到坎坷。在困难面前有两种人，因此有了两种不同的选择。一种人选择鼓足勇气，勇往直前；另一种人则是逃避，则是放弃！你会选择哪一种？

我想，答案是肯定的。

[中学优秀作文_生活需要勇气

忽然，就一瞬间。

心里面很难受。特别想就一直呆在家里头。做一个窝囊的没理想的人。自己其实也不是什么有理想人，就盼着过柴米油盐酱醋茶的平常日子。却发现，所有的平常生活都有平常人的不平常，每个人都为了生活努力的活着；就连那只狗，我家养着的那只狗，也都是一样的。反而我们这些学生，一点儿没真正尝到过什么酸甜苦辣的我们，没有接触过社会的世态炎凉、人情冷暖的我们，要求着高品质的生活，却不能完全可靠地去把握我们的人生。我们是那么的肤浅、不谙事理、不通世故。

生存。我站得不高，看得不远，我也不敢看得很远，每一次我只敢往前看半年的时间，好好走好每一个半年。

我需要勇气。请给我勇气。

我需要信仰。请给我信仰。

每当我无所事事的时候，我最喜欢做的一件事便是-观察同学们了。在大家的身上，我看见了许多人人易犯的通病，也学到了许多待人处事的道理，而其中影响我最深的便是——勇气。

有一句话说：“勇敢不是不害怕，而是明明害怕仍勇于面对。”从前的我，是个优柔寡断、没有主见又胆小的人，但在一位同学身上，我看到的勇气的重要。一直以来，我最害怕的就是别人的眼光了，因此每次一上台，便会手脚发颤、全身僵硬，一百分的准备总是只能表现出八十分。但自从我遇见她后，我从她大方从容的态度，自信而坚定的眼神中亲身体悟到“勇气”的力量，也从此立定了我改变自己的决心。

自信满分的她一直是个发光体，灿烂的招牌笑容、清澄如水的大眼睛便是她的注册商标，表面上的她就像天生不畏惧众人的眼光，在大家的注视下反而如鱼得水。但深入认识她后，我发现她其实是个不爱出风头、不爱表现的女生，在人前优秀的表现也非与生俱来的，这一切的关键全在于她过人的勇气，满满的勇气将平凡的容颜妆点得闪耀耀人，满满的勇气为她平凡的一举一动增添了无敌的魅力，满满的勇气更抚平了她镇定之下暗潮汹涌的紧张。从她身上我深刻体认勇气带来的改变，也让我能一步步改变自己更臻完美。

在她身上我发现勇气无穷的力量。勇气便是自信的源头，拥有勇气将使人可以克服障碍，拥有勇气将使我不恐惧他人的目光，拥有勇气更将使我成为一个魅力无限、自信满分的亮丽存在!

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

The word, friend, covers a wide range of meanings. It can be a nodding acquaintance, a comrade, a confidant, a partner, a playmate, an intimate colleague, etc.

Everyone needs friendship. No one can sail the ocean of life single-handed. We need help from, and also give help to, others. In modern society, people attach more importance to relations and connections. A man of charisma has many friends. His power lies in his ability to give.

As life is full of strife and conflict, we need friends to support and help us out of difficulties. Our friends give us warnings against danger. Our friends offer us advice with regard to how do deal with various situations. True friends share not only our joys but also our sorrows.

With friendship, life is happy and harmonious. Without friendship, life is sad and unfortunate. I have friends in high positions and friends in the rank and file. Some are rich and in power. Some are relatively poor and without power. Some are like myself, working as a teacher, reading and writing, content with a simple life. We all care for each other, love and help each other. We feel we are happiest when we chat and exchange ideas with one another. With my friends, I know what to treasure, what to tolerate and what to share.

I will never forget my old friends, and Ill keep making new friends. I will not be cold and indifferent to my poor friends, and I will show concern for them, even if it is only a comforting word.

[参考译文]

“朋友”这个词的意义很广。朋友可以是点头之交、同志、知已、伙伴、玩伴、亲密的同事等。

人人都需要友谊，没有人能独自在人生的海洋中航行。我们给人以帮助，也需要别人的帮助。在现代社会，人们更重视关系和联系。一个有非凡魅力的人有许多朋友，他的力量在于他的奉献能力。

生活充满矛盾和斗争，我们需要朋友的支持，以帮助我们摆脱困境。朋友提醒我们警惕险滩。朋友主动给我们以忠告，告诉我们如何应付各种不同的局势。真正的朋友与我们同甘共苦。

有了友谊，生活幸福、和谐；没有友谊，生活变得悲伤、不幸。我有地位高的朋友，也有地位低的朋友；有的有钱有权，有的较穷且无权无势。有的和我一样教书，读读写写，满足于简朴的生活。我们都互相关心，互相爱护，互相帮助。我们觉得朋友们在一起闲谈交流思想时感到最开心。对我的朋友们，我知道该珍惜什么，容忍什么，分享什么。

我决不会忘记老朋友，同时继续结交新朋友。我对穷朋友绝不冷漠，而是关心他们，哪怕只是一句安慰的话。

[我们需要朋友英语作文及译文

生命是片辽阔草原，有许多路等你来走，只有有勇气的人，才会为自己选择一条合适的路;生命是大海中飘着的一只纸船，纸船上有一条鱼，如果这条鱼想自由，那么它将要要有足够勇气;生命是在森林中的一只小狼，母亲走了，它该怎么活?首先它要有勇气，要表现出一只狼那样威猛的气概;生命是冰天雪地中的一只小北极熊，它走失了，它将靠什么让纯嫩的自己坚强起来?是勇气!米歇潘曾说过一句话：“生命是一条艰险的峡谷，只有勇敢的人才能通过。”

不经历风雨怎么见彩虹?每个人都不能随随便便的成功。在生命的路上充满了坎坷，在生命的大海中拥有着风暴，只有有勇气的人才能走出那条坎坷的路，来到一条平坦的大路。只有有勇气的人才能在大海中劈波斩浪，奋勇前行，最后到达彼岸。

生命只有一次，我们要珍惜生命，决不让它白白流失拥有足够的勇气，让自己活的更加光彩有力!

每当我看到那些在风雨中昂首挺胸的花草,我会告诉自己:要好好珍惜生命,要像它们一样有勇气战胜困难,让生命充满光彩. 生命需要勇气作文树,砍断枝条还能再生;草,烧了...

勇气是一朵花。在清晨，它尽情的呼吸着空气;它愉悦的享受着微风;它自信的朝着朝阳……它仿佛在呐喊：我自信，我快乐。我有勇气做我真正的自己。 courage is a flower.In the early morning, it breathed the air as much as possible; it enjoyed the breeze with pleasure; it facing the sun confidently ... it seemed to be shouting: I am confident, I am happy.I have the courage to be my real self.

勇气什么?顾名思义，就是要有勇于面对自身错误并且努力克服自身不足的气概。勇气是我们取得成功必要条件之一，可以这么说只要你拥有了勇气就相当于你成功了一半。

在现实生活中，常常有人这么说，这是什么情况啊!怎么这道题目这么难，我肯定是想半天也想不出来，明天在等老师讲吧。或者是，这是怎么做成的啊!貌似好难啊，自己学了也是白学。诸如此类，这些都是缺乏勇气的表现。遇到这种情况，大家会怎么办?

就像上面提到的，自己总是认为自己不行，不会。但是大家是否有想过，自己也去亲自尝试尝试。如果没有，那么你是可怜的，自己就把自己一票否决了。无论做任何事我们都必须得有试一下的勇气。只有亲身尝试过后，才会下最后的定论。因此，想要做一个有勇气的人就必须对疑惑或者新鲜事物抱有试一试的态度。

想要成为有勇气的人光做到这点还是不够的。我们还要用知识武装大脑，增加自身的实力，实力是自信的源泉。而我们只有做到了自信，才会更加相信自己是可以的，是最棒的。从而让自己的勇气拥有了坚强的后盾。还有，我们要有钻研进取的精神，不轻易放弃一个可能的机会。这些都是成功的保障，都是让自己拥有勇气的必备条件。

我们头仰天，脚踏地。挺胸抬头，做一个有勇气的人，让勇气之花在我们的心头绽放。

勇气，是敢作敢为毫不畏惧的气魄。——题记

走遍天下，哪里都有勇气的影子，勇气的足迹。德•勇气大概是小学一年级的事了吧!

那个时候，我在我的老家读一年级。开学之前，我和我的几个伙伴一起去玩。那时已经是秋天了，在农村里，可谓到处都是已成熟的果实：红红的苹果，黄黄的柿子，青青的大枣，当然还有盛开的油菜花。当我们经过一个果园时，抬头一望：红红的苹果正向我们招手呢!

所以我们都不约而同地停下了脚步，打起了苹果的主意。不久，我们找来了一支很长的竹棒子，打树上的苹果，等我们每个人都有了一个苹果后，就丢掉“凶器”无声无息地跑掉了。回家的路上，我的心总是忐忑不安：应该把这苹果还给主人吧!

那不行，我们可是费了一番气力才得到的苹果，就这样没了?况且我又不敢去认错。但心中想到爸爸妈妈教我要有勇气认错，于是我鼓起勇气，走回去认错。结果万万没想到的是：看果园的老伯伯不但不断夸我是好孩子，还又摘了又大又红的苹果送给我。我明白了：品德好需要勇气。智•勇气小学五年级，我们班内的分化很大：好的学生非常好，而差的学生根本就只能做基础题。而且好学生从不向差学生请教。我的同桌阿兴，正是一个差生，他人品挺好，但学习就是不努力，因此成绩总上不来。他总戴着一副眼镜，眼镜架在那高高的鼻梁上，因为带了眼镜，显得眼睛又特别小。那一天下午的自习课上，大家做着数学作业。课室安静极了，就连一根针掉在地上都听得清清楚楚。我做着做着，发现这路上突然跳出来了一只“拦路虎”。我绞尽了脑汁都想不出来。看看我旁边的阿兴，已经做完了。我心想：要不问问他吧!

人和人是平等的。孔子也说要不耻下问呢!

于是，我硬着头皮，鼓起勇气，问他这题应该怎么做。阿兴先是一脸的惊讶，然后非常高兴，连忙跟我讲解，直到我懂为止。同时，通过这一题，我成为当时班上第一个与差生开始建立友谊的人。我懂了，学习需要勇气。体•勇气那是在初一下学期。那一天，天气很好。我们班在石门中学运动场上体育课。体育老师竟然说：“这一节课我们进行长跑测验，男生1000米，女生800米”。话音刚落，我的头脑就开始发涨：1000米呀!

那岂不是要跑两圈半?小学跑300米都已经跑得我上气不接下气，跑1000米以后，我不就丢了半条命?这时迎面吹来了春风，但我觉得是冷冷的。起跑之后，我被远远地甩在了最后。我无精打采地跟着后面小跑。突然听见我们班的那些女生在喊：“山哥，加油呀!

”我听了以后，想一想：不就1000米吗?一会就跑下来了。我拿不了第一，但是我毕竟也有参加呀!

体育重在参与。于是，我鼓起勇气，开始我的1000“长征”。虽然最后我还是倒数第一，但我已经尽了力。当然，没有勇气，我根本就跑不下来。我知道了，体育竞技也需要勇气。如果没有勇气，我就不可能得到老伯伯的夸奖;如果没有勇气，我就不可能得到那份珍贵的友谊;如果没有勇气，我就更不可能坚持跑完1000米长跑。生活需要勇气，勇气无处不在。如果没有勇气，我就不可能……

每一个人都是要经历许多坎坷之后才会成功，在人生坎坷的路途中我们最需要的就是勇气。塞万提斯说：有了勇气便能粉碎厄运。

我喜欢看中华达人秀，从中受到很多鼓舞。曾经看到一位姐姐，她失去了双腿，但依旧勇敢的站上了舞台。事情的是这样的：2008年的那场地震，她家的房子塌了，她自己先从房子里逃出来。后来，她发现爱人还在屋里，就回头去救。她让爱人先逃出去，自己随后就出。正当她往外跑时，屋顶上的砖块掉了下来，压住了她的双腿。从此这位年轻女人的命运就完全改变了。在她的生命里行走、奔跑这两个词就完全消失了。

她的爱人知道她残疾后，就离开了她。刚开始她总是有寻死的念头，但她在周围人的鼓励下，她勇敢的活了下来和命运抗争。又一次，不经意间她看到了达人秀这个节目，看到很多达人就是身边的人，甚至跟她一样有有残疾的人，都怀揣梦想勇敢地走上了舞台。她很想参加，可是怕自己会被别人嘲笑。在家人和朋友的鼓励下，她终于如愿以偿去中华达人秀舞台展示自己的才华。

她上舞台前，安了一条假肢，柱着一副普通的拐杖缓缓的来到舞台中心。一位观众为她端来了一把椅子，扶她坐上。她用自信的微笑和坚强唱出了一首《隐形的翅膀》悠扬的歌声飘荡在上海的夜空，掌声不断地响起……她用歌声告诉人们她很棒的！

人生的道路上，有许多坎坷，我们一定要学会勇敢去面对，你努力了，幸福就会萦绕在你的身边。就如李大钊先生说的那样：走过了奇绝壮绝的风景，才会体会到生活的乐趣。努力吧，朋友们，用坚强的勇气来战胜生活中的困难，那么胜利就会属于你。

[生活需要勇气初一优秀作文

我曾经看过这样一篇文章：说美国有一个恐高症患者，居然爬上了四十多层高的大厦。在当时美国人中有极多一部分都患有恐高症。当这个消息发出去时，所有人都惊呆了，居然会有人爬上那么高的大厦，而且这个人还是以恐高症的患者。当时多少媒体都在疯狂的报道他，因为在当时这是一件多么不可思议的事啊!

这天，在一个记者招待会上，有一名年近百岁老奶奶听说了这件事后，徒步走了一百多公里，为的就是来庆祝这位勇敢的小伙子。可是他却没想到，这样的庆祝，却创下了一个年近百岁的老奶奶，徒步走一百公里的世界纪录。当有位记者采访她时，她说：其实我更本没有想到自己走的是一百公里，我只想到我走的是一小步，只要走一小步，再走一小步，就可以了，因为走一步是不需要勇气的。

他们听了老奶奶的话，自然也就明白了，为什么以为恐高症的患者，可以爬上这么高的大厦。那是因为爬一小步也是不需要勇气的，只要爬一小步，在爬一小步，就会离成功不远了。这一秒不放弃，下一秒就一定会有奇迹。

我了这篇文章，我很感慨。为什么世界上的那些害怕这，害怕那的人们，你们为什么没有想到这点呢?对呀，走一步其实真的不需要勇气!

加油吧!那些曾经失败的人们，从新站起来，让自己变得更坚强，更勇敢!

留不住岁月的脚步，留不住儿时的童真，我跟着似水流年的岁月慢慢长大。一路收获，一路成长……

还记得小时候跌倒的情景吗？

那天风和日丽，我在家门口玩耍，突然不小心摔了一跤，磕破了膝盖。妈妈闻讯赶来，左看右看没有找到可以打骂的东西。妈妈说：“坏风儿，坏风儿害得宝贝摔跟头”我扑哧一声笑了，“妈妈，今天没有风。是我自己不小心摔倒的。”妈妈抬头看看天，是呀，天气闷热的连丝风都没有。妈妈没有说什么，她只是抚摸着我的头笑了。我忍受着疼痛，鼓起勇气站起来。

成长，需要勇气。跌倒了要有勇气站起来，犯错误了要有勇于承担错误的勇气。

转眼间，我快小学毕业了。在人生前行的路上，我们或许迷茫，不知所措。被一个个岔路口所迷惑，那将是对我们的考验。选择一条荆棘丛生崎岖不平的小路，还是选择一条通往光明之路的康庄大道？有勇气去选择，就要有勇气服输。不过没有彻底的失败，也没有完全的成功。一切还是需要一种坚持与坚强。我们还是要经过无数的黎明，无数的黑暗。但黎明之后是光明，黑暗之后是光明。

成长，需要勇气。面对挫折一笑而过，“一切都是瞬息，一切都将过去；而那过去了的，就会成为亲切的怀恋”

成长的路上，充满挑战，充满刺激与惊险。你是否能化险为夷？前方的路是未知的，或许黑暗，但我们不要为之放弃，有勇气把握自己的人生，有勇气挑战自己。

成长，需要勇气。磕磕绊绊的经历会让我们的阅历更加丰富精彩。

因为有了勇气,我才站在蹦极台上,低头向离我百米多高的草地上跳;有了勇气,我才能够站在舞台上,秀出我那优美的舞姿;有了勇气,也才有了家里书柜上那一张张证书,那一个个闪闪发亮的奖碑;因为有了勇气,才有了我辉煌的今天!

勇气,使我站在蹦极台上!

在那烈日当空的一天里,爸爸妈妈同我一起去蹦极,有多少次我摇着头,耷拉着小脑袋,跺着脚,掉着金豆豆,我哭着,闹着,不去就是不去,而今天,长成大姑娘的我,心中充满了勇气,再加上爸妈的一声令下必须跳,我只好闭着眼睛,心扑通扑通地跳,走上了蹦极台,经人一推,终身一跳,啊尖叫声回荡在天外,此时,我已用勇气战胜了恐惧,作文生活需要勇气,初中一年级作文《作文 生活需要勇气》.

勇气,让我站在了绚丽的舞台上.

我还小,那一次比赛中,心中对台下几百双锐利的眼睛充满了恐惧,在台下准备的我,急得直跺脚,眼泪在眼眶了直打滚,吵着不上台,可最后,在妈妈的利诱下,爸爸的鼓励下,我还是上了台,那一次,过于紧张,抢拍了,没得奖!可回到家后,我反思了一下,心理立刻有了勇气,在又一次的小童星比赛中,我又凭着勇气,战胜了困难,有了勇气再次让我获得了金牌!

勇气,令我的获奖证书、奖杯堆积如山!

生活中就该有勇气,因为有了勇气,我才有荣誉、进步!

在人的一生中，都会经历很多磨难，每个人都必须经历这些磨难才能够成长。没有捷径可走。经历人生的悲、欢、离、合后才能领悟到人生的道理。而经历这些磨难大家首先需要的就是勇气。

“同学们，这个星期就学到这，放学!”老师在讲台上宣布到，台下的同学都欢呼起来：“欧耶!放学咯!终于回家咯!”由于上初中后，同学们一个星期才回家一次，所以大家都非常想念父母的唠叨，想念家庭的温暖。终于熬到星期五了，大家都异常兴奋。渐渐的，同学们都走了，班里只剩我和班长了。糟糕了，怎么妈妈还不来啊!“小倩，怎么啦?还不走吗?我的家长来接我咯!我先走啦!你走最后记得关好门窗哦!”班长边说边收拾课本。已经迫不及待的想飞到她妈妈身边了。“恩，你先走吧!我等人。”我冷静的说到。其实心里早已经急得不成样了。滴答滴答。时间过得飞快，天空已经渐渐演变成橙色，太阳不见了。只有几朵云闲来无事在空中飘飘荡荡，我的妈呀!天黑了学校里会不会闹鬼啊!神呀，你可别吓我啊，我小小的心脏承受不起这么重大的打击。心里越想越慌，越想越忐忑。突然脑子闪过一个想法，对!问老师借手机打电话给妈妈不就得ok了么?心动不如行动!说干就干!手忙脚乱的收拾书包，关好门窗，抱着忐忑的心走到办公室里，语文老师呢?语文老师呢?目光匆匆扫过每一个角落。“同学，请问你找哪位老师啊?”身后的人向我肩膀上一搭，“啊!”吓得我尖叫一声。慢慢转过头“呼!”原来是语文老师，被吊起来的心顿时放了下来。“老师，我……”“恩?怎么啦?”“我……”“别紧张啊，有事慢慢说。”哎，怎么退缩了呢?说好的呢。说好要问老师借手机的啊!怎么办?难道又退缩么?我怎么这么没用啊!怎么办，怎么办?“你到底怎么啦?”老师问道，已经来到这一步了，难道又要退缩么?难道我一辈子都这么担小?反正已经来到了。死就死吧!呼，冷静点，别急，慢慢来。会成功的。“老师，我想问你借手机，打个电话给我妈妈。”在自己不断的鼓舞下，一股脑的说了出来。心开始噗通、噗通、噗通。狂跳。“哦。就这么简单?给!”老师从衣服的袋子里掏出手机，递到我的眼前。我打了一串熟悉的电话号码后，传来“嘟、嘟、嘟……”的声音。“喂，你好，请问你是哪位?”耳熟的声音传来。“妈妈，是我啦!你在哪?怎么还不来接我?”“哦，宝贝啊，妈妈在广州这边哦，现在还赶不回来，你还剩多少钱?”“恩?大概，40多吧。”“哦哦，够了，够了，你自个儿打的回去。就这样啦，开车呢，拜拜”“嘟嘟嘟……”我还没来得及反驳，妈妈就挂了电话。断了电话后我懵懵懂懂得站着。眼前陷入了黑洞，心一下子跌下了深渊。天啊!你没开玩笑吧!快来打救我吧!过了几分钟，清醒了过来，面对现实吧!但脑海里一次又一次地浮现出妈妈跟我说过的那则新闻。一名出租车司机贩卖女孩到西安等等，让妈妈来接吧!时间转眼而过，学校都快空无一人了。她该不会不来了吧?哎，我怎么办呢?怎么这么没用呢?走，去试试看去，我可以的。不知不觉间来到了乘坐出租车的地方。腿还在发抖，但也没办法啦!不来都来了!豁出去了!“那个，去岳埔多少钱?”“岳埔吗?上车吧!17”“恩。”慢慢的发现司机走的那条路是正确的，心也定了下来。

付过钱，蹦蹦跳跳地回家了。站在家门口，我再也压抑不住此时此刻我兴奋的心情。

经历了这些后，我懂了人生需要是勇气!你们认为呢?

寒风呜咽着从江面吹过。岸边，血，溅起一道完美的弧线，映着江面上泛红的太阳，画面就此定格……

项羽，一个神话般的人物，就这样血洒江面，就这样强悍了一生却懦弱地选择了死……

是的，懦弱。这个曾经在别人眼中神勇无比的巨人，在我眼中，至少在最后那生死抉择的瞬间，是懦弱的.他退却了.选择死，每个人有不同的说法.我的理解是：因为他没有活下去的勇气。

项羽一生可以说是辉煌的，而正因如此，他不懂胜败乃兵家常事，他接受不了失败，无法正确面对自己的失败，不懂得就算这次输得干干净净，也还有希望东山再起.他不懂，也不愿意去懂，于是，选择了死。

和项羽完全不同，却得到最后胜利的人———刘邦，一生和项羽作对，失败了无数次，却屡败屡战.他只赢了一次，只赢了项羽唯一输的一次.赢得就如同项羽输的那么彻底.刘邦赢得了一切，而项羽却输掉了一切。

为什么?我的回答是：勇气。

刘邦的勇气是可贵的，或许他有点苟且偷生，但至少他在失败后有活下去的勇气和信心.这是项羽比不上刘邦的地方，也是项羽失败最致命的原因之一。

其实，很多事情都需要勇气。

面对失败需要勇气;

承认失败需要勇气;

弥补失败需要勇气;

所以，生活也需要勇气。

因为，生活，本就是一个不断在挫折中完善自我的过程。

在不断成长的过程中，勇气，对于我来说最重要，是最不可缺少的。今年夏天我又通过勇气，学会了一项运动——游泳。

游泳，对于他人来说，可能是一项简单的运动，但对我，就是难上加难了，因为我以前没有接触过游泳，就连去海边，也只是坐在沙滩上，静静的看着别人的在海里嬉戏，所以游泳的真实感受，在我眼里，是充满神秘的，是充满未知的，是需要探索的。

第一次真正的走进游泳馆，我东瞅瞅西看看，眼睛对一切都充满着好奇，游泳馆里有两个泳池，一个大的和一个小的，了解了大概的环境，妈妈带我去找了教练，学习游泳，正式开始了，教练先让我趴下，学习游泳的基本动作，不一会儿我就学会了，心里暗暗得意，我还以为游泳有多难呢，原来这么小菜一碟，看来很快就能“出师”了。

教练看我学得八九不离十了，就让我下到泳池里，扶住泳池的边缘，说。：“不要紧张，身体放松，肩膀不要耸起，胳膊伸直，像我这样用嘴深吸一口气，然后把头伸进水里，用鼻子呼出。”这时，我的脑袋里突然出现了两种声音，一个声音说：“把头伸进水里会呛着水的，太难受了。”另一个声音说：“伸进水里顶多会呛，又没什么大事，赶紧做吧。”但是两个声音中，我选择了后者，深吸了一口气，猛地扎进水中，但没想到，顽皮的水娃娃，穿进了我的鼻子里，使我喝了一大口水，我被呛得不行，想要放弃，可又有点不甘心，在和自己一番激烈的斗争后，我鼓起勇气，对自己说：“你一定可以，加油！成功在前面等你。”然后又扎进水里练了起来，虽然前几次都失败了，但我仍没有放弃，默默为自己打气：“失败乃成功之母，加油。”终于在最后成功了，之后的每一节课里，我克服了许多困难，用勇气闯过了一关又一关的难题，功夫不负有心人，我终于学会了游泳。

在我的生活中需要勇气，它陪伴我克服困难，闯过心里的难关。

它是成功创业者的无穷财富，它是意志不坚者无法逾越的鸿沟，它也是生活必不可少的调味品，它就是挫折。

暴风雨来临时

“妈，你看，我考了满分，第一名呐!”我得意地盯着那犹如盛开的花儿一般鲜艳的一百分，手舞足蹈的比划着我是怎样怎样攻克一个个难题的，妈妈却一如往日的平淡，说：“千万别骄傲，可不能大意啊!”可是这时已是骄傲的我又怎么会有心思听进去呢?

暴风雨来临时

不久，数学便挂起了红灯笼，地理也差点挂了科，一向对知识钻研细腻的我怎能忍受得了这般打击?我哭了，窗外风雨交加如同我的心，泪水早已模糊了我的眼睛，然而祸不单行，一向对我疼爱有加的奶奶也离我而去了，我如遭雷击，常在夜里哭醒，那段日子对我来说仿佛没有阳光;班主任也说我整天“沦陷”，妈妈察觉我整日闷闷不乐，她并没有说什么，只给了我一句话“少年壮志不言愁”这番良言像一阵清新的春风，吹醒了我昏昏欲睡的头脑，像一场绵绵的春雨，润泽着我心头潜滋暗长的幼苗。我理解了母亲的话，也理解了母亲的一片苦心，于是，我开始了改新。

暴风雨来临后

我不再沉浸于悲伤之中，而是勇敢地直面挫折，悲痛似乎已变得微不足道。每天放学回家，我都不停地在脑中回想自己在课上哪一环节做得不好，哪里应继续做下去那一应该进……很快我又临来了期末考试，我一丝不苟的答完了最后一道题，千斤重的心终于放下了，我笑了。结果和我预想的一样，我坐上了原来的宝座，阳光也有暗淡的时候，但生命的花朵永远鲜艳，当我又一次捧回满分的试卷，我和妈妈都真正地笑了，开心的眼睛里跳跃着青春的火花。

失败之后接踵而来的是成功，是生活让我彻底领悟了“落后就要挨打”“风雨彩虹，铿锵玫瑰”想要成功，就要挫折，生活需要挫折，因为有了它，才会有明天的辉煌与成功!

该向成功者学习经验还是向失败者要方法?这是个问题。今天S君的一个问题难住了我，作为一个失败者，好像是没有资格去讨论该如何成功的话题，既然问到了我，也只好从个人失败的经验出发，以失败者的身份去讨论一个关于如何才能成功表白的话题。

按照S君的话来讲，他和爱慕对象还处于暧昧阶段，两人中间隔着窗户纸，他的内心像冬天里的一把火，这阵子突然就想去表白，一直苦恼纠结于表白之后的各种不堪和尴尬。这一下子让我回想起当时和一个女孩子表白的场景:男朋友?NO!闺蜜?NO!普通朋友?NO!意识到连朋友都做不了的时候有一点怅然若失，心里油然而生出一种愧疚感，像个做错事的孩子手足无措般期待着爸妈的宽容和安慰。于是，我等来了“何必在一棵树上吊死”的安慰。那时，我觉得她太敞亮了，一下子给了我一个小太阳般的温暖。后来没再联系，也不是不想联系，一想到大家都挺忙，都有各自的生活，一下子又冒昧闯入别人的生活，始终害怕再次体验像孩子般等待被宽慰的心情。电影情节中对喜欢的人的恋恋不忘，充其量满足了内心的不甘和遗憾。

S君一直纠结于他对爱慕对象的感觉，害怕表白成功后是否能始终如一，从一而终。我笑他 想太多，都还没表白成功就考虑以后的事情了。倒是他的直接反而有一种说不上来的神圣感，处于情感强烈交替状态的人总是爱玩弄文字游戏，“喜欢和爱”，“你不懂我，我不怪你”。“你和我是不同的两类人”。处于情绪低落状态的弱势一方又总是逞强去辩解，赢了道理又如何?人家都已经懒得和你去理论了。如果你要问我，我平时怎么老是强调自己的观点，老是爱跟别人去辩解，或许这就是原因吧!

体会不了孤独，始终难以明白在一起的可贵。对于一个失败者而言，最不能忍的不是情感孤独，最难忍的是思维孤独，就正如你很喜欢一个人，可她的举手投足间，她的话题你始终插不上一句话，这种隔阂让你立刻就把她当做花瓶，远远地观赏了。距离产生美，在思维层面碰撞不出火花，想要在情感层面打通任督二脉，那是痴人说梦。

闲聊中，S君突发奇想:我默默在她身边照顾她，陪伴她，让她依赖我，事事都离不开我，我想这样成功的几率会大大增加了吧!这样做成功的概率有多大我不清楚，就记得这是电影上经常出现的桥段，电影是梦，而梦又常常是反的，这大概是痴人说梦而已吧!

喜欢一个人，你连说出口的勇气都没有，你有什么勇气坚持到最后给她幸福呢?或许你会说，陪伴是最长情的告白，那你确定你不是她众多云备胎中的一个?爱真的需要勇气!可是电影中却常常忽视现实去探讨爱情的诸多形式和可能性，如果你还没有准备好，那就先看看电影，电影里的比你的精彩!

学了20课“花的勇气”，我似懂非懂的，常常在想，什么是勇气呢?只是在冷风冷雨中拔地而起的小花有勇气吗?那还有什么是勇气?我想不通!

星期五，妈妈对我说：“宝贝，你的头发长长了，该去剪剪了，好不好?”(要知道，我从小一直是留长发的)我想了想班里把头发剪短的女生，李卓然，吴雨涵等剪得也挺漂亮的，再想想每天要梳头，夏天到了，时间长了不洗头头上还会有异味，就答应了妈妈。

星期六，爸爸带我去理发，刚到理发店门口，我迈不动步子了，我想：“好不容易才长长的头发，被理发师三下两下就剪掉了，多可惜呀，再说了，我剪短发不好看那就更倒霉了。”想到这，我对爸爸说：“爸爸我不想剪头发了，行吗?”“那可不行，说话不能出尔反尔啊!”爸爸说。这时，我看到路边的小花，想到了20课“花的勇气”，心想：“小花都那么有勇气，我还怕剪头发吗!”说着，我就和爸爸走进了理发馆。

坐到椅子上，理发师三下两下剪出了一个发型，我闭着眼睛不敢看自己变成什么样子，爸爸说：‘睁开眼睛看看吧，挺好看的!我睁开眼一看，自己变成了另一个模样，还真不难看!

我想，我从不敢剪发，到走进理发馆，从敢看自己变成什么样子到睁开眼睛，这都是一种勇气吧!

啊，今天我“品尝”到了勇气滋味!

生活需要勇气。有了勇气，也就有了动力；有了动力，我们才会为之去奋斗。

是呀，一个人如果连勇气都没有，又怎么能做好一件事呢？那么在失去勇气后，又该如何将勇气找回来呢？就听一下我的故事吧。

还记得一个周六，爸爸带着我去千丝岩玩。我穿过一条长长的林荫小路，直奔天门。哇！天门也太高了吧！我能爬得上去吗？我心里像吊着十五个水桶——七上八下。

我紧紧地抓住两旁的铁链，手脚并用，一步一步向上爬，刚爬几步，我的脚就已经发颤了！都不听我使唤了！这时，我回头一看，哇！这么高，我的腿吓得发软，向上爬也不是，往后退也不行，我正左右为难！妈妈似乎看穿了我的心思，语重心长地说：“这困难就像弹簧，你弱它就强。这困难又像两只老虎狭路相逢，勇者胜。”听了妈妈的鼓励，我又继续往上爬了。爬着爬着，终于爬上了峰顶，我感到自豪。

站在峰顶，欣赏着千丝岩的美丽风光，真是“一览众山小”啊！我激动万分，庆幸自己找回了勇气，战胜了困难！

原来，战胜他很简单，只要有足够的勇气，勇气一遍又一遍的在我灰心气之时，为我插上自信的翅膀，让我飞向成功的殿堂。

“什么是勇气?”有人会问。“勇气是一种看不见，摸不着的东西。”有人会答。看不见?摸不着?我不禁产生了疑问，因为勇气总能在我迷茫是帮我找到成功的光亮。

毛毛虫变成蝴蝶需要勇气，虽然在这次变形之后毛毛虫将会发生巨大的变化，他将从受人啜泣的虫子变成美丽的蝴蝶，但是你知道么，这通向新生的梦之路上，是多么危机重重，它必须在毫无保护自己能力的情况下，抵御自然的灾害，抑制天敌的进攻，每一项人类看似简单的事情，对于毛毛虫来说，需要付出多么巨大的勇气。唯有战胜自己，无所畏惧的虫子，才可以展开美丽的翅膀，在花朵的簇拥下翩翩起舞。

谈起勇气，让我很自然的就想起了一个人。他就是董存瑞。那是多么伟大的勇气才可以鼓舞他作出那样的举动。当炸弹举在头顶时，董存瑞的表情是安详，幸福的。因为他明白，即使自己的生命再宝贵,但是在同祖国的和平相比起来，就变得渺小起来。这种对于祖国，对于革命的忠诚，就是出于一种勇气，一种大无畏的精神。以至于他在祖国的利益与尊严面前，毅然放弃了自己的生命。

我们的生活也需要勇气，当遇到难题时，要拿出能解决它的勇气。在遇到困难时，要拿出能克服它的勇气。当受到挫折时，要拿出站起来的勇气。在尝到成功时，要拿出更加努力的勇气。

勇气推动前进的动力!

放暑假了，晚上我们小区里的很多小朋友会下楼玩耍，有滑旱冰的，有打羽毛球的，有下棋的，有骑自行车的。

看着邻居的小朋友骑着自行车，在小区的空地上转来转去，我羡慕极了，如果我也有一辆这样的小自行车兜兜风那多威风啊!于是我吵着要爸爸妈妈买一辆自行车。

第二天爸爸推着自行车来到了我的面前，一辆蓝色崭新的小车，小小的轮子，黑色的把手，握着特别得舒服，车子非常漂亮，我高兴极了，我迫不及待的下楼去骑了。

我坐上自行车学着别人的样子骑起来，可车身歪歪斜斜的怎么也平衡不了，摔了好几次，膝盖也擦破了皮，我生气极了，也害怕摔倒，想放弃学骑自行车。爸爸说：“没关系的，慢慢来，你把握方向，如果要斜倒的话自己用脚踩地上平衡住就可以了。”爸爸的话鼓舞了我。我鼓起勇气，再来!我小心翼翼的踩着脚踏板，开始摇摇晃晃，跌跌撞撞，骑着骑着我掌握了方法，骑地越来越稳了，在小区里转圈，迎面吹来的风打在脸上，耳边的风呼啸而过，感觉好极了!

我会骑自行车了，大家为我叫好，说我学的快，爸爸更夸我有勇气战胜困难，旁边不会骑的小朋友也用羡慕的眼光看着我，我心里也甜滋滋的。在小区里兜了一圈又一圈。

勇气给了我无限的快乐和生机!