我需要勇气用英语怎么说(通用20篇)

成功与失败只有一步之遥，向前多走一步不需要多大勇气——题记。

人生重在积累，成功是一个从量变到质变的过程。一步登天只是人们对成功的幻想，脚踏实地才是一种平淡的真实。

“拔苗助长”的故事告诉我们，成功不能一味的走捷径。每一分收获都是由每一滴汗水堆积起来的。只要你愿意，向前多走一步不需要多大勇气。

伟大的发明家诺贝尔，他一生拥有355项专利发明。并广泛得到了世界人民的认可和好评。

1862年夏天，诺贝尔开始了对硝化甘油的研究。这是一个充满危险和牺牲的艰苦历程。死亡时刻都在伴随着他。在一次进行炸药实验时发生了爆炸事件，实验室被炸得无影无踪。五个助手全部牺牲，就连他最小的弟弟也未能幸免。他的邻居出于恐惧，纷纷向政府控告诺贝尔。此后，政府不准诺贝尔在市区内进行实验。但是诺贝尔百折不挠，他把实验室搬到市郊湖中的一艘船上继续实验。经过长期对失败的积累和研究，他终于发现了一种容易引起爆炸的物质——镭酸汞。他用镭酸汞做成炸药的引爆物，成功解决了炸药的引爆问题。

成功或许只是你在面对困难时的一种选择。

爱迪生一生有一千多项发明。他为了发明电灯，阅读了大量资料，光笔记就有四万多页，他试验过几千种物质，做了几万次实验，才发明了电灯;如晋代着名书法家王献之写字，用尽18缸水，最终成了一代书法大师;又如李时珍花了31年的功夫，读了800多种书籍，写了上千万字笔记，游历了7个省，收集了成千上万个单方。为了了解一些草药解毒的效果，吞服了一些剧烈的毒药，最后写成了中国医药学的辉煌巨着《本草纲目》;再如英国生物学家达尔文研究进化论，花了22年时间，写成了《物种起源》一书;还有法国着名物理学家居里夫人，历经了12年的实验，不怕挫折和失败，从几十顿的矿物质中提取了几克镭;古往今来，勤奋是人们获得成功的必要前提。

多一滴汗水的付出会是另一种收获，懒惰的去应付会是另一种结果。成功需要我们一步一步的去积累，成功与失败不是一步的距离，而是一步一步叠加起来的距离。

“平静的湖面练不出精悍的水手，安逸的环境造不出时代的伟人”，俄国着名物理学家列别捷夫如是说。很多时候坚持可以改变一种结局，当我们被挫折战败想要放弃的时候，记得告诉自己：向前多走一步不需要多大勇气。

竹子有勇气，它敢于与大自然抗争，当风吹来时，它弯弯腰，又挺起来了;花儿有勇气，它不仅在风和日丽的春天开放，还在冰天雪地中傲然怒放……每个事物地成长经历中都缺少不了勇气。 Bamboo has the courage to fight against nature. When the wind blows, it bent over and stands up again;The spring of wind and sun is open, and it is still proudly blooming in the ice and snow ... There is no lack of courage to grow in everything.

有一次，因为“十一长假”我的英语课调到了星期三晚上。虽然父亲以为这是不要紧的，而对于我来说是一次巨大的考验，因为晚自习的学习任务是最多的。前一天，我就为这件事烦的睡不着，可是这件事是一定要发生的，何必烦躁呢?我抱着好心态准备迎接“风吹浪打”。那一天和往常一样，一眨眼就过去了。晚上，我刚吃完晚餐就背着一大堆作业和英语书上课去了。

开始上课了，我又想起了回家作业，不禁变得无精打采。可我又对自己说：“在这，你不打起精神还是要补作业，为何不多学点知识呢?”我立刻打起精神来上课。一节课上完了，接下来是15分钟的休息时间，就马上迎接下一节课。我打开作业本立刻争分夺秒起来。时间一分一分地过去了，我从没这样与时间赛跑过。上课了，虽然没有把作业全部做完，可也完成了一大半。下一节课更为精彩，我完全忘了还有作业在身，老师还为我盖上了“EF”章。

回到家，当然少不了修整一番，可有个信念促使着我：“一定要把作业做完。”我顾不上吃水果喝果汁，立刻伏在案头写起来。夜深人静，大家都睡着了，唯独我一人还在写着作业，连笔和纸的摩擦声都听得一清二楚。当眼睛不由自主地要合上时，当哈欠连打时，我终于写完了。准备上床睡觉。这次调课是对我勇气的考验，如果我没有勇气，不可能抱着好心态去上课，更不能拿到老师的“EF”章，熬夜写作业就更不可能了。

勇气，是你做错事时，敢于承认;勇气，是你面临挫折时，敢于面对……我们要有勇气才能克服一切困难，解决一切问题，在人生路上更进一步。

勇气是什么?勇气是你在面对苦难，面对挫折时的一把利剑;是你和朋友吵架后的一种和好的信念;是你在面对-时一股能忍住-的自制力。勇气就在我们心中!就在那件事后，我明白了勇气的含义。

周末的一个上午，我正做着家庭作业，不知不觉早已过去一个多小时。我站立起来，伸了个懒腰，活动活动筋骨。这时我听到了一阵敲门声，我打开了门，门外站着舅舅和弟弟。弟弟常常到我家来玩，他非常调皮，就像从石头蹦出来的孙悟空一样爱上蹿下跳。我看着他在我家沙发上跳来跳去，头痛不已。突然，我的手不经意间挥到了爸爸茶桌上的那对金边白瓷茶杯，那茶杯摇摇晃晃地向右边倒去，并快速地往下掉。我伸手去接，可已经晚了，那茶杯就伴随着弟弟的一声叫喊，碎了。

我惶惶不安地想：这可是爸爸最心爱的茶杯呀，怎么办。怎么办。弟弟问我：“哥哥，怎么了?我听到了什么东西响了一声。”我支支吾吾回答道：“没事，你去玩吧。”舅舅和妈妈闻声走了过来，看到弟弟站在破碎的茶杯前，而我站在一旁。

舅舅立马大发雷霆，生气地对弟弟说：“你怎么能乱动东西呢?拿东西也分不清轻重。”弟弟大哭起来，我心里清楚弟弟是受了委屈才哭的，但是如果现在说是我打碎的话，那……妈妈在一旁安慰着弟弟，舅舅带着弟弟回去了，远远地，我还能听见弟弟的哭声。

我在书房焦急地想：怎么办呀?如果我不承认是我干的，我就不是一个诚实的人，弟弟以后也会怪我的。但是承认了错误，我肯定会被爸爸骂一顿的，真是进退两难啊!我在房间里急得来回踱步，额角上也冒出汗珠，手心也出汗了。“难道就没有万全之策吗?”我对自己说，真的是心急如焚。

到了吃晚餐的时候，我一点吃饭的胃口都没有，筷子在碗里来回拨着米粒。爸爸妈妈看我这个样子，关心地问：“炫炫，怎么了?”我突然间鼓起了勇气说：“爸爸、妈妈，其实那茶杯是我不小心碰到打碎的，跟弟弟没有关系。你们打我吧!我知道那是爸爸最心爱的茶杯。”爸爸坐着没有动，对我说：“茶杯打碎了不要紧，可以再买。但是你如果犯了错误却不承认，你就会慢慢地养成撒谎的习惯，一个人品质坏了就很难纠正了。勇于承认自己犯的错误就是一项很好的品质。爸爸，不仅不会怪你，还要表扬你!”

是啊，人要有敢作敢当的勇气。只要明白这个道理，我们才能在人生的道路中乘风破浪!勇气在我今后的生活中会带领着我披荆斩棘。无论前面是什么，我都会勇敢面对、勇于承担!

不经历风雨，怎能见彩虹?只有拥有真正胆量的勇士，才能夺得胜利的宝剑!成长也一样需要勇气，只有敢于迈出第一步，才能坐上通往胜利的彼岸之沱。

去年暑假，我在老妈的鼓励下去学游泳。虽说去之前老妈已经为我做足了心理工作，可到了游泳池边，我还是忍不住想逃跑——谁让我恐水呢!可我已经答应老妈要学游泳了。再说，不能一件事难做就不做，我一定要拿出点勇气，不能向困难低头!

我缩了缩身子，一屁股坐在泳池边，先把脚放进水里，适应水温，过了一会儿再慢慢地让身体浸在水里。终于，我克服了第一个困难，不再害怕水了。

就这样，我凭着自己的勇气，一天天学习着游泳技能：深呼吸、憋气、蹬腿……慢慢地，我的动作越来越熟练。最后，我享受着像鱼儿一般的自由，轻松地学习着游泳。可我还是有一样不敢尝试，那就是跳水。

和我同培训班的小朋友却最喜欢跳水了，每天上课前他们都要跳几次秀一下技能，或者像鱼儿一样边跳边在水中嬉戏。我看了非常羡慕，可就是没有勇气去挑战自我。一起学习的小飞看出了我的心思，把我拉到跳水台边，鼓励我试一试。她告诉我：每个人在成长中都会遇到害怕的事情，一定要战胜自己，勇于挑战没有经历过的事情，这也许能让你收获到意想不到的惊喜。听了她的话，望着她充满期待的眼神，我决定试一试。

我打了个寒战，一只脚摇摇晃晃地踩在跳水板上，另一只脚却迟迟不跟上。“你就试一试吧!”小飞轻轻地推了我一下，在她的鼓励下，我稳稳当当地站上了跳水板。“跳!跳!”其他同学站在泳池边为我鼓劲。我双眼一闭，心想：阿门保佑!老佛爷保佑!教练一定要救我……“嘭!”我一个猛子扎进了水里。此时，我脑子里一片空白，眼前一蓝，耳膜一震，也不知怎么的就游到了对岸，而且还是用标准的自由泳姿势!

一上岸，大家纷纷过来问我感觉怎样，是不是一点也不可怕。我想了想，意味深长地说：“如果没有足够的勇气，我想，我永远都不能体会到尝试新鲜事物的乐趣。”

是啊，人在成长的过程中需要勇气，没有勇气展开双翅的小鹰永远飞不上蓝天!身为新一代的小学生，我们更多需要的是敢于尝试，勇于攀登!

爱要勇气母爱是伟大的，母亲为我们奉献了那么多，而我们也应该为自己的母亲做点什么，比如----对母亲说声“我爱你”。即使如此，我也从未对自己的妈妈说声----我爱你。并非我不爱她，只是我羞于启齿。我觉得正儿八经地对妈妈说那句话，挺别扭的。

吃晚饭时，妈妈匆匆地往嘴里扒着饭。她等会儿还要上班，要不是担心我和弟弟，她早就去找一份更好的工作了。想到这里，我的心“咯噔”了一下，张了张嘴，结结巴巴地说：“妈妈，我···我···”我好想把“我爱你”三个字说出来，可这三个字就像卡在喉咙里一样，怎么也说不出口，我脸红起来。“嗯?怎么了?脸怎么这么红?是不是发烧了?”妈妈搁下筷子，想看看我是怎么了，我仓促地说：“我们十月一日要放八天假。”我低下头来，想掩饰自己的脸红，可这一切在妈妈眼里却变了样，她以为我是怪她不陪我出去玩。她坐下来，有些愧疚的对我说：“我要上班，没时间陪你们，下次我休假陪你们去玩。”

晚上九点多，妈妈拖着疲惫的身体回来了，她到家后一刻也没闲着，洗碗，洗衣服，打扫卫生····我看着看着，眼泪就流了下来。我把她叫到客厅，把她按在沙发上，别扭地坐在她旁边，低下头，轻轻地对妈妈说：“妈妈，我爱你!”

我抬起头时，妈妈的眼眶里已经充满了泪水，我用自己的手帮妈妈擦去了泪花。我和妈妈相视而笑。妈妈笑得十分灿烂，十分美丽。

原来，爱是需要勇气大声说出来的。

留不住岁月的脚步，留不住儿时的童真，我跟着似水流年的岁月慢慢长大。一路收获，一路成长……

还记得小时候跌倒的情景吗?

那天风和日丽，我在家门口玩耍，突然不小心摔了一跤，磕破了膝盖。妈妈闻讯赶来，左看右看没有找到可以打骂的东西。妈妈说：“坏风儿，坏风儿害得宝贝摔跟头”我扑哧一声笑了，“妈妈，今天没有风。是我自己不小心摔倒的。”妈妈抬头看看天，是呀，天气闷热的连丝风都没有。妈妈没有说什么，她只是抚摸着我的头笑了。我忍受着疼痛，鼓起勇气站起来。

成长，需要勇气。跌倒了要有勇气站起来，犯错误了要有勇于承担错误的勇气。

转眼间，我快小学毕业了。在人生前行的路上，我们或许迷茫，不知所措。被一个个岔路口所迷惑，那将是对我们的考验。选择一条荆棘丛生崎岖不平的小路，还是选择一条通往光明之路的康庄大道?有勇气去选择，就要有勇气服输。不过没有彻底的失败，也没有完全的成功。一切还是需要一种坚持与坚强。我们还是要经过无数的黎明，无数的黑暗。但黎明之后是光明，黑暗之后是光明。

成长，需要勇气。面对挫折一笑而过，“一切都是瞬息，一切都将过去;而那过去了的，就会成为亲切的怀恋”

成长的路上，充满挑战，充满刺激与惊险。你是否能化险为夷?前方的路是未知的，或许黑暗，但我们不要为之放弃，有勇气把握自己的人生，有勇气挑战自己。

成长，需要勇气。磕磕绊绊的经历会让我们的阅历更加丰富精彩。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

In the matter of courage we all have our limits. There never was a hero who did not have his bounds. I suppose it may be said of Nelson and all the others whose courage has been advertised that there came times in their lives when their bravery knew it had come to its limit.

I have found mine a good many times. Sometimes this was expected--often it was unexpected. I know a man who is not afraid to sleep with a rattle-snake, but you could not get him to sleep with a safety-razor.

I never had the courage to talk across a long, narrow room. I should be at the end of the room facing all the audience. If I attempt to talk across a room I find myself turning this way and that, and thus at alternate periods I have part of the audience behind me. You ought never to have any part of the audience behind you; you never can tell what they are going to do.

留不住岁月的脚步，留不住儿时的天真，我跟着时间慢慢长大。一路收获，一路成长……

还记得小时候跌倒的情景吗？

那天风和日丽，我在家门口玩耍，突然不小心摔了一跤，磕破了膝盖。妈妈闻讯赶来，看到是一块石头把我绊倒了。妈妈说：“坏石子，坏石子害得宝贝摔倒了”我扑哧一声笑了，“妈妈，石子又没有长脚。是我自己不小心摔倒的。”妈妈看了看，是呀，没有说什么。妈妈没有说什么，她只是抚摸着我的头笑了。我忍受着疼痛，鼓起勇气站起来。

成长，需要勇气。跌倒了要有勇气站起来，犯错误了要有勇于承担错误的勇气。

转眼间，我快小学毕业了。在人生前行的道路上，我们或许会遇到很多困难，不知所措。有勇气去面对，就要有勇气征服。不过没有彻底的失败，也没有完全的成功。一切还是需要一种坚持。

成长，需要勇气。成长的路上，充满挑战。我们是否能化险为夷？前方的路是未知的，或许黑暗，但我们要有勇气把握自己的人生，有勇气挑战自己。

成长，需要勇气。磕磕绊绊的经历会让我们的生活更加丰富多彩。

[作文成长需要勇气450字

成长的过程，是人生最美妙又最美好的一个阶段，成长的过程就像打翻了五味瓶，酸甜苦辣样样都会尝遍，但也只是苦辣中的辛酸，辛酸中的甜蜜，甜蜜中的乐趣。能从辛酸中体会到乐趣，那就是你的勇气。

――题记

从你学走路开始，稚嫩的小脚丫第一次接触到地面，学着放开爸爸妈妈的搀扶，并学着自己站立。这需要的是什么?勇气。

第一天上幼儿园，你强忍着眼泪与爸爸妈妈说再见，挥动的小手中藏的是什么?勇气。

小学开学的第一天，爸爸妈妈因有事而不能来接你，望着身边个个同学的家长都在嘘寒问暖，失望的你自己收拾好书包，只好找到姐姐，一起回家去。这需要的是什么?勇气。

大雨中，你左盼右等，始终不见妈妈，最后你冒着雨，孤独的身影消失在大雨中……这需要什么?勇气。

考试考糟了，你流下了悔恨的眼泪，坦诚地向父母交代。这需要什么?勇气。

当得知爷爷得了肺癌之后，你表面上装做没事，依然爷爷说说笑笑，但背地里却不知流了多少眼泪，能够大胆地哭，这需要什么?勇气。

成长过程中的困难，如一道道牢不可破的大铁门，勇气则是你唯一不变的钥匙。

如果你前方有一座山岭，你是选择后退还是攀爬？如果你前方有一条河流，你是选择后退还是渡涉？如果你前方有很多困难，你是选择投降还是挑战？想必大家都选择后者，那你问问自己，你是否有前行的道具——勇气？

那年，是秋菊盛开的季节，也是我战胜自己，勇敢向前的开始。

“为什么？为什么……”我狠狠地踢着墙壁，泪流满面：“为什么天这样不公平，为什么？”那时，是我最痛苦的一次，我喜欢学习，喜欢音乐。可是，就在科比的前两个星期，我意外摔伤了手，而且，还是那只可亲的右手，我不能再带着它遨游于书的海洋，可是，写字成了我最大的障碍，我憎恨那个操场，是它绊倒了我，我憎恨那些同学，他们都在嘲笑我……我关闭自己的心灵窗户，什么也不愿去做，什么也不愿去听，只是每天都在想：“科比，歌咏比赛，科比，歌咏比赛……”我一次又一次，一遍又一遍地默念着，我想去参加科比，更想去参加歌咏比赛，可是……

时光总是那样急匆匆，两个星期一眨眼就过去了，我的手还没有痊愈，我没有去参加科比，因为老师说我写字不好看，不让我去，而歌咏比赛，过两天就开始了，那是自由报名的，我想……“请参加比赛的同学到后台报名。”喇叭重复着那几个字，我双眼盯着舞台，紧张地握着拳头，想站起来，却觉得身体很重，到底是去还是不去？终于，我坚决地站了起来，走上了舞台，这是我的勇气。“命运就算曲折离奇，命运就算……”优美的歌声回荡在校园里，流进了人们的心灵，更流进了我的心灵，在我的生命中萦回。

美丽的前方属于坚强的人，坚强的人拥有勇气，勇气则使前行更美丽，因为，前行需要勇气！

[前行需要勇气作文

寒风呜咽着从江面吹过。岸边，血，溅起一道完美的弧线，映着江面上泛红的太阳，画面就此定格……

项羽，一个神话般的人物，就这样血洒江面，就这样强悍了一生却懦弱地选择了死……

是的，懦弱。这个曾经在别人眼中神勇无比的巨人，在我眼中，至少在最后那生死抉择的瞬间，是懦弱的.他退却了.选择死，每个人有不同的说法.我的理解是：因为他没有活下去的勇气。

项羽一生可以说是辉煌的，而正因如此，他不懂胜败乃兵家常事，他接受不了失败，无法正确面对自己的失败，不懂得就算这次输得干干净净，也还有希望东山再起.他不懂，也不愿意去懂，于是，选择了死。

和项羽完全不同，却得到最后胜利的人———刘邦，一生和项羽作对，失败了无数次，却屡败屡战.他只赢了一次，只赢了项羽唯一输的一次.赢得就如同项羽输的那么彻底.刘邦赢得了一切，而项羽却输掉了一切。

为什么?我的回答是：勇气。

刘邦的勇气是可贵的，或许他有点苟且偷生，但至少他在失败后有活下去的勇气和信心.这是项羽比不上刘邦的地方，也是项羽失败最致命的原因之一。

其实，很多事情都需要勇气。

面对失败需要勇气;

承认失败需要勇气;

弥补失败需要勇气;

所以，生活也需要勇气。

因为，生活，本就是一个不断在挫折中完善自我的过程。

虽说失败乃成功之母，但要迈过失败这道坎，对于常人来说，需要能够承受失败所带来的巨大痛苦，需要有勇气在痛苦中总结经验和教训，需要有勇气去面对世人的热嘲冷讽，需要有勇气去坚定自己的意志和毅力，这样，才能一步一步走向成功。

偶有闲暇，回顾自己走过的五十年人生历程，事业虽然无成，但五十年的人生历程，每向前迈上一步，每一步都是艰辛，每一步都需要勇气。

孩提时代，几个小伙伴仅凭一盒火柴，一把烟火，便敢上山捣马蜂窝。有时，小伙伴们个个都被马蜂蜇得头青脸肿，好几天不能消散。现在想来，真是初生牛犊不怕虎，但正是这种不怕虎的稚嫩行为，培养了我们克服困难战胜困难的勇气。如果没有这种初生牛犊不怕虎的勇气，我们就无法品尝马蜂的美味，我们就无法有难以忘怀的童趣。

上世纪八十年代初，本人高中毕业第一次参加高考便榜上无名。失败的痛苦比马蜂蜇得更难受！但我不甘心，不甘心一辈子在农村修理地球，不甘心一辈子脸朝黄土背朝天！哪时的高考虽百里挑一，但凭着自己的决心和毅力，凭着不言败的勇气，经过两年的复读，终于考上师范大学。大学毕业时，第一次走上讲台，内心虽忐忑不安，但台下几十双求知的目光却给予了我勇气，这勇气让我在讲台上一站就是两年。

往事如烟，第一次恋爱，第一次跳槽，第一次写文章向报刊投稿，第一次写诗，第一次走上领导岗位。多少次的第一次，多少次的成功和泪水，都有勇气相伴！

[成功需要勇气作文550字

如果没有勇气，成龙不会拍出那么多武打片;如果没有勇气，那些现在红得发紫的明星也不会有那么大的成就。做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。

我们都很勇敢?是的。如果我们不勇敢，怎么可能脱离妈妈温暖的羊水来到这个美好而又残酷的世界。没有勇气，我们不可能经历无数的挫折，然后长大。做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。

勇敢其实并不难。经常会有这种话语：“你真胆小。”“你要勇敢!”“…………”但是你要知道，你是勇敢的，至少，你也勇敢过。做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。

听到这些话语，你会很郁闷吧?其实并不需要郁闷。只要你知道：“我是勇敢的!”其实你本来就很勇敢。其他人也是这样。所以你不要嘲笑别人不勇敢。大家都是勇敢的。做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。

第一次上台演讲，第一次表演节目，第一次当着很多人的面发表对另一个人的看法……人生中有很多第一次，这些第一次中，你都会觉得自己并不勇敢。其实你是勇敢的。做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。

挫折是必须面对的，成长中必定有挫折。不经过风风雨雨，没有挫折的磨练，你必定不会成功。而面队这些挫折时，需要勇敢。你可以不勇敢，但是你不能永远不勇敢。做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。

做什么事情都需要勇气，成长，也一样。想要快乐，想要成功，必须勇敢。

生活需要成功的喜悦，生活需要挫折苦痛，生活需要欢乐的笑声……生活更需要奔向前方的勇气。 那一次，我和二伯一起去游泳馆游泳。我一看到游泳池就迫不及待地套上救生圈向浅水池奔去。刚要下水，二伯走过来，拍拍我肩膀，对我说：“小子(昵称)，这么大还游浅水池，套上救生圈，上深水池去。”我听后，心想：“虽然套上救生圈，但如果一不一小心，还可能有危险……”二伯好像明白我的心思：“有二伯在，怕什么?男子汉要有勇气。”

我将信将疑地下了深水池。 刚游了一会儿，我心上的石头算是放了下来。哪知又有“险情”，二伯游过来说：“嘿，过来，二伯教你游泳，把救生圈摘掉。”我怕得嘴直抖。二伯严肃地说：“要有勇气呀!要有勇气呀!男子汉大丈夫的话，该大胆。男孩子嘛，就要会游泳。”经过一番心理教育，我脱下了救生圈。二伯一巴掌把我的头压进水里。

“呼，呀，呼”，我的嘴直冒泡。我心想：“要有勇气，才能战胜困难。”我凭着这个信念坚持了一分多钟。二伯终于放手，笑着说：“小子真棒!” 接着，二伯让我由他的手扶着游泳。我想了想：“好像很危险，但不这样我不管怎样也学不会游泳呀?嗯，来就来吧，旁边还有救生员。但救生员个个面黄肌瘦，能行吗?不还有二伯吗?”“好!”二伯扶着我的身子游了起来，起初我还很怕，但二伯对我说：“你只胆大心细，有十足的勇气往前，保证你行。”我听后，心中的怕已抛到了九霄云外。 想起我刚才害怕的样子，我惭愧…… 生活需要勇气。它能克服困难，它能消灭害怕的心理，它能让你自信十足。

从你学走路开始，稚嫩的小脚丫第一次接触到地面，学着放开爸爸妈妈的搀扶，并学着自己站立。这需要的是什么?勇气。

第一天上幼儿园，你强忍着眼泪与爸爸妈妈说再见，挥动的小手中藏的是什么?勇气。

小学开学的第一天，爸爸妈妈因有事而不能来接你，望着身边个个同学的家长都在嘘寒问暖，失望的你自己收拾好书包，只好找到姐姐，一起回家去。这需要的是什么?勇气。

大雨中，你左盼右等，始终不见妈妈，最后你冒着雨，孤独的身影消失在大雨中……这需要什么?勇气。

考试考糟了，你流下了悔恨的眼泪，坦诚地向父母交代。这需要什么?勇气。

当得知爷爷得了肺癌之后，你表面上装做没事，依然爷爷说说笑笑，但背地里却不知流了多少眼泪，能够大胆地哭，这需要什么?勇气。

成长过程中的困难，如一道道牢不可破的大铁门，勇气则是你唯一不变的钥匙。

在我们的生活中，勇气是必不可少的。

以前，我很胆小。在幼儿园里，我总是静静地坐在最后面的角落里，一声不吭。吃午饭的时候，有不想吃的菜，不想喝的汤，不敢告诉老师；有时肚子太饿，吃完一碗，也不与老师说添饭，吃完了就听话地去午睡，与老师，同学很少打交道，就连回家也不怎么主动说话。

到了大班，我随姑姑一起去了海口，我变得更孤僻了，我无法适应那里的环境，在学校就连老师叫我，也不理会。

到了学前班，我依然很文静。这时，有一个开朗的小朋友经常与我一起玩。渐渐地，胆子大了，我慢慢懂得主动与人交流，谈话。

一年级的时候，我仍像一只小兔子，但在课堂上却能见到我大胆的一面，因为我喜欢举手回答问题。

二年级以后，我越来越活泼，经常参加各种活动，下课以后到处疯跑，所以总是碰伤，跌伤。比起以前，真是天壤之别。

在以前，无勇气就无朋友；现在，有了勇气这种力量，我有了许多朋友。

《文静的小女孩》中，蝴蝶让>孤独的小女孩拥有许多朋友；《勇气叩响成功的大门》中，法拉第依靠勇气和才能进入了英国皇家学院那高贵的大门……我明白了，没有勇气就不会成功，就像房子不打地基就不行，无论友情，商业，>投资……都不能缺少————勇气！

勇气能使你一生受益匪浅，勇气是生活中必不可少的一把金色的钥匙；勇气就像一缕灿烂的阳光；勇气就是一个能帮助你解决困难的可爱精灵！

[生活需要勇气作文6篇

相信大家都很熟悉一句话：“只有失去的才懂得珍惜。”初次见此话心中充满不屑，“哼，存在的时候都不重要，失去了才不会有多痛。”只是当一件事真是的发生在我的眼前，我才知道，去珍惜、去爱也需要勇气。

那是去年暑假，为了笑笑我使劲浑身解数脱离母亲的掌控自己一个人回到泉州。刚下飞机的我感到如释重负的轻松。在机场看见父亲，竟没有太多的感情，离开的这一个月，我和父亲没有通一次电话，没有一次聊天，在我的内心世界里，母亲已占去了太多的空间，父亲为了公事这几年更是极少回家，我们见面的机会都很少，何况他一回来就只跟母亲吵个没完没了，再加上我们性格的差异，我们也就渐渐疏远了。

坐着车接回笑笑，竟然比看到父亲还要开心，父亲抿着嘴一言不发，途中几次想开口，却又好像没有找到适合的话题而闷闷不乐。说实话，这些我都看在眼里，但却没有什么牵动，就好象看着一个陌生的司机。

到了家，父亲主动搬行李到了楼上，他在包里搜索了好久，才在一个不起眼的角落里找到了家的钥匙。进了家门，他只是匆匆交代几句，就头也不回的走了。那一瞬间，竟然还是充满着不舍，原来血肉亲情是不能忘的，也是忘不掉的，即使从没有说出过爱，其实对方心里也清楚不过。这几年来，所有物质的要求能达到的他都一一满足我，虽然他看不到我心里的悲伤。

接下来，一个人坐在诺大的房子里发呆，突然回想起儿时，父亲用他的大手抱起我，用胡子轻轻地扎我，我一边笑一边打他，而他只是傻傻的笑。父亲从不回家吃午饭，妈妈告诉我他要照顾奶奶，中午要陪奶奶。晚上回到家也是吃过饭后就匆匆的走了，那时每次我都会隔着铁门喊：“老爸，快快回家!”他总是一点头就匆匆消失在电梯那一个小小的封闭的空间里。夜渐渐黑了，笑笑依偎在我的怀里，我竟有一种莫名其妙的思念。不，绝不是想母亲，这种思念很复杂，很奇怪，连我自己都说不清。我好希望有一双大手抱紧我，告诉我不要怕黑夜的降临，那是一个全新的开始。但没有人这么做。

终于明白，那是女儿对父亲一种特殊的想念。终于明白，自己心里是一直爱他的，只是没有勇气说出来，就像电视上的肥皂泡沫剧演的那样，怕说穿了，明白了自己的心，被伤害之后会更痛苦。会害怕遭到冷淡的回应。其实，我们之间的隔阂，仅仅是没有勇气。没有勇气去珍惜对方，没有勇气说出一个爱。其实我们心里的清楚得很，只是相处的太少，就像陌生人一样。只要自然的把那一个千古缠绵的字说出来，你会发现，他一直都爱着你，也和你一样，没有勇气说出来。

我一直期待我们之间的关系也能像别的家庭一样很自然。这一次，我要为了我自己，也为了爱我的人，鼓起勇气努力一次，把那层薄薄的窗户纸捅破，说自己的感受。也许，那扇窗户的背后，装的是满满的幸福。

不知是谁将“父爱如山”给予了父亲，也许是你，也许是我，也许是他。

——题记

母亲，总是把幸福有形地传递给我，而父亲您，却将这幸福套上了神秘的纱衣。

我曾认为，我的幸福是来自母亲的，我的悲伤是来自父亲您的，可是，当姐姐说：您曾在她面前夸赞我，表扬我时，我落泪了，整个心都在此刻幸福着。可是，心中却划过了一道寒流，划得我好心酸，好心痛。我不敢相信，一向冷眼不语的您，竟然是这样的关心我，看重我。于是，我开始向耳朵质疑，向自己质疑，不停地问自己：难道自己的的耳朵打小差?难道自己在做梦?一串串的问题，就像是断了线的珍珠，洒落在地，让人急促，让人绕脑。

父亲啊父亲，为何把幸福包装的如此神秘莫测?为何把幸福遮掩的如此“完美”?明明是爱我的，又为何不去将它显现?面对别人说爱我，面对别人来赞我，听到的永远只是别人，而不是我。这样的幸福，是会变成天空中落寞的雨滴的，又为何遮掩她幸福的光环呢?

父亲啊父亲，知道吗，我是多么渴望得到您的爱，又是多么想说一声："我爱您”。可是，我发现，我做不到，我被一种叫做“勇气”的东西所击倒。曾有多少次，曾有多少天，曾有多少个春夏秋冬，我在背后默默的望着您——望见了您生病的身体，望见了您手指上的伤痕，望见了您变瘦了的躯干，做女儿的我，怎能不想说：“父亲，您辛苦了，一定要注意身体啊!”可我却没有说出口，心中的那份爱，就这样，久久不能释怀!

如果，我再勇敢一点，您怎能不明白女儿爱您的心?如果，您再勇敢一点，女儿怎能不懂您如纱的爱?好想好想大声地说：“我爱您”好想好想大声地说：“我理解您”可那仅差1%的勇气却到了哪里?我好想好想牢牢地将它握住，将他送进自己的内心。

爱，真的需要勇气!

也许是千百次努力挥之一去，无数次的失败让我迷茫。我在每次看着失败的同时也在仰望着这个世界，为什么命运总是那么的不公平，让拥有的多一些的人拥有更多。付出的一切的一切早已他可曾看到，我觉得我的人生活的好失败啊!

一直都在追赶，无数次的想放弃，却都没有狠下心。每次想放弃是总问问自己为什么走到这里，我不敢放弃，也没有放弃的权利。好像大海中寻找大陆的船，永远找不到家的方向。每次考试，总看着别人在哪里谈笑风生，只能自己默默为自己揪心。就感觉同样都是人，为什么人与人差别就那么大，为什么我每次的努力都失败。

渐渐地，我几乎都变得麻木了，或许那些扎进我心已经太多次了，早已感觉不到疼痛。我觉得不仅仅在学校，在家里，父母总是喋喋不休的谈论别人怎么样，总是故意在提醒我。我也是感觉做父母的太失败了，我也不愿意在一个不理解我的家庭之下生活一辈子，我也不想永远做那个配角。但没办法上天总是在磨难我。

经历了一个学期的高中生活，我也明白了些许。学习在很多时候就是一种方向的坚定，方法的坚持，行为的坚守，新鲜过后的持之以恒与反复不断的时间。路很长，走的也许会慢些，去掉浮躁敢以淡泊，用智慧和辛勤走在正确的道路上我们就一定能成功。

每次当我感到已经用尽全力的时候，我总会告诉自己再加把劲，就快成功了。上天或许在某些方面是公平的，当你想要得到一些东西，就要失去一些东西。我已经努力的在忘记，但是总有些东西是忘不掉的，因为真正的忘记是不需要努力的。

感谢那几个让我真正看清我自己的人，你们让我认识到了自我，让我有了拼搏下去，活下去的理由与勇气。把我从黑暗中拽了出来，我觉得我不会再去想放弃了，坚持下去，为了我的梦想，为了新安，为了高人一等。

人的一生，谁都想活得有模有样，可是，世事难料，预测与结果总是存在着差距，当这种差距让人难以接受时，活着也需要勇气。

今天在网上看到这样一条消息：一男子从南京长江大桥桥面跳入江中，从60多米高的空中落水后，求生本能让他拼命在江水中挣扎，面对及时划船赶来营救他的渔民还连声道谢，但是该男子最终因内脏受损不治身亡。为什么要到悲剧发生后才产生求生的本能呢?那不是太晚了吗?

前两天，我们这里一位有名的摄影老前辈离我们而去了，听说他是因为听到自己得了不治之症而对生活失去了希望“吓死了”。而就在十天前，他还给我们上了一堂课，也许他是因为年纪大了，也许因为他的身体虚弱，也许因为他太用心讲解，以至于他脸上不断在流汗，当汗水滴落到他的讲稿和作品上时，他才用袖子胡乱擦一下，继续激情四溢的演讲。他的作品和他对艺术不断追求的执着感染了我，让我又重新树立信心，再次拿起封存起久的相机记录我身边的故事。这样一位老艺术大师面对生命都是如此的脆弱，何况年轻气盛的新一代呢?在面对情感困惑、债务缠身、生活窘迫等等不幸时，他们选择活着需要更大的勇气。

人活着难免会遇上一些难以跨越的人生关口和不幸，容易产生放弃和轻生的念头。据统计，我国每两分钟有1人死于自杀，每年自杀人数为28。7万。而南京长江大桥自1968年建成至今，累计超过2000人在此跳桥身亡，在一些寻短见者的眼中，南京长江大桥已成为了他们心中的“自杀圣地”。人们在遇到不幸时，通常会选择退缩、逃避、放弃，而不是勇敢去面对，拿出勇气活下去。其实，如果死都不怕了，活着又怕什么呢?与其鼓起勇气想方设法地死去，倒不如鼓起勇气好好活着。

朋友，不管生活有多么艰难，多么无奈，多么没趣，我们都应该拿出足够的勇气，战胜生活中的种种不幸和不尽人意，好好活着，象《活着》里的福贵一样顽强地活着。因为活着也是一种勇气，活着就有希望。