《追风筝的人》读后感英文（实用20篇）

当很多人都在推荐这本书时候我就很好奇这本书写的是什么，为什么那么多人推荐。追风筝的人，代表着什么意思呢？带着疑问我翻开了这本书。

追风筝的人，我终于明白了追风筝的人是什么意思了。虽然译后记里写到：对阿米尔来说，风筝隐喻他人格中不可少的部分，只有追到了，他才能成为健全的人，成为他自我期许的阿米尔。但我更愿意简单的认为，追风筝的人指的就是哈桑，那个陪他一起成长一起放风筝，每次为他追到风筝，在他夺冠那次不惜受辱都要保护那个蓝风筝的哈桑，那个被他背叛的哈桑。风筝，是他童年最美好的回忆，也是最痛的回忆。

索拉博自杀的那一段，我的眼泪止不住的流。为什么，为什么！为什么这么小的小孩子要承受这么多的痛苦，为什么！仅仅只是因为他是哈扎拉人？所以他的父母就要被当众击杀，所以他就要被凌辱，所以他就要被像个玩偶一样在音乐响起的时候必须跳着那滑稽的舞蹈？最近去了一趟南京__纪念馆，日本人对中国人的屠杀让我想起来塔利班对哈扎拉人的屠杀。以前都说爱国爱国，民族振兴，并没有什么太强烈的感觉，感觉那离自己很远，但这一次民族强大的信念第一次那么沉重的击打着我的心灵。对民族信念的麻木终有一天会让南京__重演，或者出现像塔利班对哈扎拉人的屠杀。我们不管在哪，不管变成一个多么优秀或多么糟糕的人，我们都代表着我们血液里流淌的民族。如果这个民族代表着懦弱，无能，我们每个人都是逃脱不了这种声音。所以所有的华人，无论在哪里，都会为这个民族的强大努力着，因为他们也是这个民族的一部分，他们也许不是中国籍，但也改变不了他们是中国人的事实。

全书都写的很压抑，很沉重，唯独与索拉雅的爱情是那么的让人赞许。美妙的一见终情，结婚前的坦陈与包容，婚后无子也坚守的婚姻，已经完全不是阿富汗人的作风，也自由了，也幸福了。虽然有些人说作者在后面有着浓浓的拜美情绪，但面对自由和平的美国和枪弹尸体的阿富汗，我想，作者并不是在拜美，只是对美好生活的一种向往，希望阿富汗的天空能再飘着那么多自由的风筝，让他重新回到那个记忆中的故乡。

也许每个人心中都有一个风筝，无论他意味着什么，让我们勇敢地追。

The Gift of the Magi is a short story wrote by O.Henry.This story tells that in the day before Christmas,a poor young couple exchanged gifts by sold the most precious thing of each,but resulted ordetracted, the two precious gifts all became useless things.While they got the most precious thing than any material objects——love.

After read this story,I learned how to respect others love and how to love others.In this story,they all lost the most valuable things——Jims golden watch and Dellas beautiful hair. Behind this, I saw they loved each other infinitely.They loved their family, they let me feel that cold Christmas Eve has become the warm heaven just because of their gifts. If Della only took one dollar and eighty-seven cents to pick gift,this story will probably lacking of shocking, and also cannot cause readers thinking.

In this materialistic society, people often use money to measure gifts.When bags of gifts which are packaging delicately in front of us,what can we see except empty and blank? Parents feel happy because of our simple greeting cards in their birthday,because of a few words of blessing.These gifts,simple but true.It cant be compared with those which built with a lot of money, outlined by luxuriance. What clever gifts! In some sense, they are invaluable.

Yes,in this materialistic society,some people think money is everything,the one who owns money,who owns all.No wonder a great amount of girls became mammonists,and want to marry richers;no wonder more and more men think that there is no true love,what girls love is their money. But I always believe sincere love is existed and its priceless. Even if you have millions of money, you cant change it into true love. Maybe money can let you get some feelings from girls, but those are hypocritical. When you no longer possess vast wealth, the hypocritical feelings will ended and left you extremely painful finally.Jim and Della were a happy couple, although they were poor, living in short of money.In their hearts, money is not important, the important thing is the affection from each other.As long as they have it, they felt happier than any millionaire.

Maybe some people will pour scorn on it and cannot understand what their done. If there is a good fortune and a sincere feeling in front of you at the same time, which one will you choose? I wouldnt hesitate to choose the later, because sincere feeling is priceless! I believe that true pay will have sincere return finally, and the one who have true love can have his or her happiness.

Nowadays,more and more people have been pressed to lose their breath by the reality.They forgot the persons they love,and the persons who love them.We need to care about others,no matter how much money we have.What our loved one need is how our concern about him or her. In some important days,dont forget to bring him or her some gifts.No matter what is it,how valuable is it,he or she would like it anyway.

Because it is the gift of the Magi.

The Olympic Games, which originated in ancient Greece, is the most distinguished sporting event in the world. Once every four years, the utmost athletes from all around are lured to gather together and spare no efforts to compete against each other and try to win a medal for the country that they represent. Frankly speaking, that was virtually all I knew about the world-famous Olympic Games before I had read a book entitled The Olympics published by Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. However, I found even more philosophy beyond just winning medals from reading the book, which was beyond my imagination and considerably inspiring.

Someone once said, “Were everybody on earth involved in some kind of sport, our world would be free of war for long.” Starting from three thousand years ago, the ancient Olympic Games has long been an event not only for competition but also for peace. In ancient times, no war was allowed between the cities during the Games, which was rather surprising to me since I could hardly imagine warriors actally putting down their weapons and give a break for peace. The precious tradition of peace continued: I would never fail to recall the scene of the opening ceremonies when North and South Korean athletes entering the stadium with their hands held together. The two neighboring countries that used to be enemies are no longer enemies during the Games. Instead they became friends. Speaking of the XX Athens Olympics, perhaps most people would have the same opinion that the most noable part of the opening ceremony arrived when Iraqi and Afghan representatives showed up. These two unfortunate nations, the people of which have undergone innumerable wars, are coming back again to take their own responsibility in world sports after recent invasions by America. The fearless people of Iraq and Afghanistan are once more sharing the spirit of the Games with people from the rest of the world.

There is another story in this book that makes me deep in thoughts. There is no doubt that the most unusual Olympic Games ever in history is the 1936 Olympics held in Germany, which was then ruled by the Nazi Party. Led by Adolf Hitler, the Nazi believed that the so-called Aryan people were superior to all others in all aspects. They looked down upon Jews and blacks, the latter of which was a major constitution of the United States Olympic team. Despite the barrier that faced him, the African American Jesse Owens, who was a most outstanding runner and jumper, did all that he could and finally won gold medals for his country and went home a hero. This reveals another fact that no power on earth is able to hinder the sacred Olympic Games. For all participants, no matter what their gender, race, nationalities and backgrounds are, equality is distributed among every one who observes the Game’s rules.

At the XX Athens Olympics, our Chinese team did extraordinarily well. We ranked second on the medal lists for the first time in history. In my opinion, however, we should not only concentrate on the figure of medals; instead the strength and perseverance of those who failed to get any medals ought to be highly cherished. Whether ever success or failure, whether ever cheer or tear, whether ever medal or not, the never-gave-up spirits of athletes are always motivating us. I believe in the year 2008, the world will focus all their attention to Beijing, China, where the glory of the Games will continue to thrive forever!

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.

People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

These days Ive just finished the novel Uncle Toms Cabin that left a really deep impression on me and we can see.

It is a book written in 1852 in response to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Law， Uncle Toms Cabin has been considered as the most influential anti-slavery novel in that period and described by Stowe herself as a “series of sketches” describing the human cruelty of slavery， opens with a description of Arthur Shelbys Kentucky plantation during the antebellum period.

There are several impressive characters in this novel， George who is clever and brave;Harry， a beautiful and talented child who sings dances and mimes;Mrs. Shelby， a very religious woman;Sambo and Qimbo and so on. The major character Uncle Tom who was the most impressive in this novel was a devout Christian. He endured the miserable fate bravely and aroused the whites sympathy for slaves with his Christs sacrifice and the tolerance of returning good for evil. This novel focuses on the distinctive personalities of Uncle Tom deeply influenced by Christianity and the important role Uncle Toms Cabin playing on abolition; and the Significance of “Uncle Tom” to the harmonious worlds development， and the effect on modern people.

In the book， at the beginning， the author presents us a very beautiful image of a rather harmonious family who live a happy life. However， that beautiful image couldnt last long， the darkness came soon. The master of this happy family， Uncle Tom was arranged into a difficult situation. As Shelby， the not cruel master， he has incurred serious debts- prompting him sell some slaves to avoid financial ruin， so Uncle Tom， Shelbys loyal servant since childhood was sold to Mr. Haley， the slave trader. Uncle Tom remained loyal to his master， despite his betrayal and the risk of death at the cruel hands of a new master. The slaves at the plantation were very mournful， but Tom remained placid and tried to read his Bible for fort. On the steamboat to New Orleans， where Tom was to be sold， Tom befriended an angelic little girl， “Little Eva” St. Clare. Uncle Tom saved the five-year-old beauty from drowning， and she convinced her father to buy Tom for her own family. In her family， Tom enjoye.

d his life because of the girls love; Toms contentment does not last， however， because Eva soon falls ill. Dying， Eva asked Mr. St. Clare to free Tom after her death. But Mr. St. Clare is so sad by her death that he never legally freed Tom before he himself was killed trying to mediate a barroom scuffle. Mrs. St. Clare sold the slaves to settle her husbands debts and Tom was sold to Simon Legree who was so violent that beat his slaves brutally. At last， when Mr. Shelby， finally found Uncle Tom， he was almost died. After Tom was dead and buried， Shelby went back and freed his slaves.

As we all can see that Uncle Toms Cabin was an anti-slavery novel and it was even considered as one factor that caused the Civil War. In the novel， the slaves were sold from one place to another frequently， and their fate was tragic， with no exception- just like Uncle Tom， no matter he was under the control of kind masters or evil masters， he cant escape the misfortune of being sold from one master to another. We cant see any human right of them， so terrible.

As someone said， with more people realizing the inhumanity of slavery in the 19th century， slavery became one of the most important issues and it became more violent year by year in American society. However， slavery was not abolished irrevocably until ratification of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865， following the Civil War. After the passage of Fugitive Slave Act of 1850， Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote this novel Uncle Toms Cabin which publicized the evil of slavery to a wide audience.

Now we are in the 21st century， we may never e across such kind of thing. However， this book can always remind of us that there ever has existed this evil and we cant let it happen again. And “equality” 、“human right ” cant just be a slogan， we should make it e true really and always.

To Regain the Nature of Goodness

—— Review of ‘Oliver Twist

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those vermin-to-be to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

The Scarlet Letter attained an immediate and lasting success because it addressed spiritual and moral issues from a uniquely American standpoint. In 1850, adultery was an extremely risqué subject, but because Hawthorne had the support of the New England literary establishment, it passed easily into the realm of appropriate reading. It has been said that this work represents the height of Hawthornes literary genius; dense with terse descriptions. It remains relevant for its philosophical and psychological depth, and continues to be read as a classic tale on a universal theme.[6] Another consideration to note having to do with the books popularity is that it was one of the first mass-produced books in America. Into the mid-nineteenth century, bookbinders of home-grown literature typically hand-made their books and sold them in small quantities. The first mechanized printing of "The Scarlet Letter," 2,500 volumes, sold out immediately, was widely read and discussed to an extent not much experienced in the young country up until that time. Copies of the first edition are often sought by collectors as rare books, and may fetch up to around $6,000 USD.

A Tale of Two Cities is one of Dickens’s masterpieces; the story is an exposure of the contradiction before France Revolution-the appealing of “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” by France lower class.

The main clue of the novel is based on the terrible experience of Dr. Manette, the plot is very complex, attracting, and exciting. Lying at the heart of which we can see the themes from different people.

Sydney Carton

When I read the chapter pertaining to interrogation on Charles Darney, intuition tells that the lawyer assistant who feels at ease with his eyes fixed on the ceiling must be a very special man, which turned out to be right when I finished the whole book. He seems indifferent about everything, even his love. He is brilliant but he thinks otherwise, or rather, he thinks he is inferior to others. Even his master thinks that if he worried about this or that, he would make a great success. Feeling of humbleness is the fatal point leading the loss of his beloved one. If Lucie Manette lives with him, he thinks, she would sustain much hardship. At the end of the story, he sacrifices his life for his love willingly.

Many people say that love is selfish and egocentric, but the temperament of Sydney Carton tells us that love can be sublime and pure. Through this, Dickens tells us loving someone doesn’t mean you should live together with him or her. You can help your beloved one silently, even sacrifice for love. This is universal fraternity, I think, which is the sublimation of normal love. And also, Dickens may indicate that true love really exists, regardless of the situation is full of commotion or not.

Charles Darney

He’s born at a family of royal lineage-the son of Marquis. Regret and abomination fill in his mind for the cruelty and the crime his family have done to the poor. He determines to quit the right of inheritance of his family and moves to England to acting as a French teacher. When he comes back to France, his notorious and sadistic uncle who holds the succession of the family doesn’t welcome him. His uncle is doomed to death because of his cruelty. When he returns to England, he proposes marriage to Lucie Manette. He knows his proposal may not be accepted by Dr.Manette, for he is the son of the enemy of Dr.Manette. After the France Revolution breaks out, he returns to France again to save a servant. But unfortunately, he’s cast into prison.

Lucie Manette

She goes to France with Jarvis Lorry to take her father back, she shows great sympathy to Sydney Carton, and she prayed his husband would get an early deliverance from captivity.

She is a kind-hearted lady made of love and sympathy; she is also the incarnation of elegance.

Dr.Manette

As a victim of the gloom society, he lives a miserable and contradictory life. After releasing from prison, the only thing he does is making shoes, which become worse when he comes across a harsh situation. He loves his daughter just as she does to him, even when he knows that Charles Darney is the son of his enemy, he allow the proposal. And when he notices his daughter was totally down to know the fact that her husband was put into prison, he promise to her that he will rescue him out. He spares no effects to do that, in vain, though.

From this person, Dickens may tells that love between the lower-class family members are as pure as crystal.

Jarvis Lorry

An elderly manager at Tellsons Bank and a dear friend of Dr. Manette. He is very loyal to Dr. Manette. He accompanies them all the time without considering his own life.

Couple Defarge

They’re the leader of the revolution. Ernest Defarge, to some extent, is a good man. He was the servant of Dr.Manette, he provides accommodation for him. But his wife, Madame Defarge, is really a wicked woman. She knits all the time, she wants to kill all the people who lead a richer or happier life just out of envying and revenge. The result turns out to be dramatic: she’s killed by herself as a consequence that the gun goes off by accident.

Resurrection maybe is the main theme in the novel. Dickens here implied that he doesn’t agree the upper class treat the poor badly, meanwhile, he doesn’t agree the lower-class to overthrow the upper class. He hopes that they can live in harmony with each other. Underneath the lines, Dickens wants his readers to be careful that the same sort of revolution that so damaged France wont happen in Britain, which is shown to be nearly as unjust as France. But his warning is addressed not to the British lower classes, but to the aristocracy. He repeatedly uses the metaphor of sowing and reaping; if the aristocracy continues to plant the seeds of a revolution through behaving unjustly, they can be certain of harvesting that revolution in time. The lower classes do not have any agency in this metaphor: they simply react to the behavior of the aristocracy. In this sense it can be said that while Dickens sympathizes with the poor, he identifies with the rich: they are the books audience, its "us" rather than its "them". Crush humanity out of shape once more, under similar hammers, and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.

A simple story, an ordinary man, an ordinary big marlin, in the vast sea happened seemingly ordinary and extraordinary experience.

This book is about a Cuban old fisherman named diego, a man fishing alone, in the 84 days after nothing caught a big marlin. This is the old man never seen nor heard of than his boat two feet longer a big fish. Big fish strength is big, dragging the boat drifted for two days and two nights, the old man has experienced in the past two days and two nights have never suffered tough test, finally put the big shark fin die, tied to the bow. At this time, however, encountered a shark, the old man and the shark dogfight, result the big marlin was shark ate up, old man finally dragged home only a pair of bare fish skeleton.

After reading this novel, I found that the old mans story is not only a symbol of the relationship between human and nature, and a symbol of the whole human spirit indestructible. In reality, though he failed, but in spirit, he is the winner. Here, the old man is not only represents a person, but to represent a force, a kind of spirit, that is to let a person admire perseverance, the spirit of never yielding. I also very admire the novel old fishermans will, he let me know how a man must be strong, cant meet the frustration is losing, that will never be a one thing.

一个简单的故事，一个平凡的老人，一条普通的大马林鱼，在茫茫大海上发生了看似平凡而又不平凡的经历。

这本书讲了古巴的一个名叫桑地亚哥的老渔夫，独自一个人出海打鱼，在一无所获的84天之后钓到了一条无比巨大的马林鱼。这是老人从来没见过也没听说过的比他的船还长两英尺的一条大鱼。鱼大劲也大，拖着小船漂流了整整两天两夜，老人在这两天两夜中经历了从未经受的艰难考验，终于把大鱼刺死，拴在船头。然而这时却遇上了鲨鱼，老人与鲨鱼进行了殊死搏斗，结果大马林鱼被鲨鱼吃光了，老人最后拖回家的只剩下一副光秃秃的鱼骨架。

读完这篇小说，我发现，老人的故事不仅象征着人与自然的关系，而且象征着整个人类坚不可摧的精神。在现实中，他虽然失败了，但在精神上，他却是胜利者。在这里，老人不仅仅是代表着一个人，而是代表了一股力量，一种精神，那是让人敬佩的坚韧不拔，永不服输的精神。我也十分佩服小说中老渔夫的意志,他让我懂得了一个人一定要坚强，不能遇到一点挫折就败退，这样永远也做不成一件事。

每个人的心中是不是都有这样一个风筝，它在风中漂浮，手中的线控制着前进的方向，如果有一天线断了，会有人给你将风筝追回来吗？即使有，追回来的还是你那只飘在空中摇曳的风筝吗？我想不是的。

文中两个主人公，一个是高贵的少爷，吃喝不愁，有学上，有梦想，有方向；一个是服侍少爷的仆人，吃住全凭自己努力，未来一片迷茫。在这样的环境下，两个有阶级区分的人成了‘朋友’，所谓的‘朋友’也只不过是自己的一厢情愿吧。我们在文中可以看到多处描写，少爷没把仆人当成朋友，而仆人已经对少爷死心塌地，甘愿为之奉献生命。

有时候在想，这本书究竟是悲剧呢还是算比较完美的结局呢？我想这个故事一开始就是悲剧来的，它以阿富汗的历史为背景，描写了两个男孩成长与心灵救赎的故事，首先背景是凄苦的，看似富足的家庭，当战争来临的时候，也必须抛弃一切奔走他乡，为自己，为亲人，为生命。其次，战争带来的始终的是无尽的死亡，从作者描写阿富汗整个落败的情景可以看出，昔日繁华的街道已经不复存在，往日故人的笑脸也已荡然无存。

战争唯一的好处是-从这本书的描写来看，它给了主人公心灵救赎的机会，这个机会也许是他一直等待的，但从他接收到要远赴阿富汗救出仆人的儿子的时候，他还是吓到了，只不过他这次没有退缩，没有像小时候看着仆人被凌辱的时候，选择了默默走开，而是终于鼓起了勇气，敢于面对这个糟糕的世界，我相信他在出发的那一刻，可能是报着必死无疑的信念的，因为这是他欠仆人阿桑的，不仅仅是他的忠心，他的生命，还有那被忽视了的友情。

如果没有阶级的划分，也许我们可以想象，两个孩子是天真无邪的，可以成为好兄弟、好伙伴、好朋友。

看了《追风筝的人》这篇文章对我来说是一个沉下心来读书的开始，一个深入思考的开始。不得不承认，在之前的很长一段时间里，我几乎对读书丧失了兴趣。经常是拿起一本书——放下。看起来，我与书无缘了。但总会有一个转折点的。当我看到《追风筝的人》这个书名，引发了我无限的联想。又看到它的封面——黄昏的天空。一层层斑斓云彩中有一片蔚蓝天空，仿佛把人带到更深更广远的世界。一只拖着长长尾巴的风筝在天空中翩翩起舞。因为一个书名，因为一个梦境，我买下了它。

故事的开始，在阿富汗。说起这个我们的邻国，并不是一个太平世界。我们总会把它与战争、难民、死亡联系在一起。让我们想起的总会是一张张惊恐的脸，没有轻松，更不会有笑容。这不是什么童话故事，也并非喜剧。

似乎一切都是注定的。阿米尔和哈桑，是一对从小一起长大的主仆，或者说伙伴。阿米尔少爷会说的第一个词是爸爸，而哈桑会说的第一个词是阿米尔。那将是他们一生最重要人的名字。阿米尔为了得到爸爸全部的爱，不惜陷害哈桑一家；哈桑为了自己的主人，受尽耻辱，最终奉献出生命。

是阿米尔错了吗？他胆小、懦弱、自私，看到哈桑被阿塞夫一群人欺负，却装不知道。但他在逃跑的那一刻，心里是多么复杂。最终他确定“为了赢回爸爸，也许哈桑只是必须付出的代价，使我必须宰割的羔羊……他只是个哈扎拉人，不是吗？”事实不是这样的，哈桑还是阿米尔同父异母的亲弟弟。然而这个被爸爸一生深埋的秘密揭开时，哈桑已经死在战争的枪下。

是他错了吗？当我们读完这本小说，无不为他的不幸所悲伤，为他的忠诚、纯真、善良所感动。但经历了一系列事情，看到主人对他的态度，哈桑还会认为这一切值得吗？他为什么还要一次次的献身？难道他也认为自己只不过是一个低贱的仆人吗？还是为了朋友阿米尔，他情愿付出一切，我们不得而知。这也许对他来说是一个美好的结局吗？

但有一点可以确定，无论是阿米尔还是哈桑，都没有错，他们原本都是纯真善良的孩子。因为种族，使他们有了高低贵贱之分，被逼向世界的两极。这个故事震撼了每一个人的心灵，他向我们再一次发出最深的呐喊：我们要和平！我们要平等！

《追风筝的人》讲述了12岁的阿富汗富家少爷阿米尔与他父亲的仆人之子哈桑之间的友情故事。小说的文字细腻温暖，就像是书的橘黄色封面上如火的晚霞。绚烂的空中，一只带着两条长长尾巴的风筝在轻轻飞舞，它的牵绊所在，就是那个追风筝的人。

故事的开始，从阿米尔和哈桑两小无猜的童年写起。爬树，摘桑葚，恶作剧，这跟所有调皮捣蛋的男孩子们的童年没什么两样。他们朝夕相处，他们疯玩笑闹，他们一起成长。本以为这是个关于男孩子间的伟大友情的故事，但文中提到哈桑会说的第一个词时，我意识到，哈桑对阿米尔，不只是哥们儿义气，那是对友谊的绝对忠诚。

哈桑嘴边的第一句话必是：“阿米尔。”

他们的共同爱好在于风筝，阿米尔是放风筝能手，而哈桑是追风筝能手，他俩无疑是黄金搭档。然而在现实里，他们并不是并肩前进的。因为他们一个是少爷，一个是仆人的儿子。他们注定不是一个世界的人。这让我想到阿来的《尘埃落定》，即使在和仆人索郎泽郎玩得亲密无间时，麦其家的这个傻瓜少爷也很清楚：“即使是奴隶，有人也有权更被宠爱一点。”或许之于阿米尔，哈桑只是他“宠爱的仆人”，说到底还只是仆人。所以在哈桑信守承诺为朋友追到风筝而受到凌辱时，懦弱的阿米尔并没有站出来，他安慰自己：哈桑只是仆人。他以“少爷”的姿态掩盖了他的无能，也扼杀了一段友情。

而哈桑，倔强到固执地相信着这段友情。他从来不会对阿米尔说“不”，他小心地鼓励着有些自卑的阿米尔，甚至为他的一句话就可以“吃烂泥”。记得有这样的细节，在哈桑受辱前，阿塞夫试图说服哈桑把蓝风筝让给他，然而哈桑不答应，只因给阿米尔的承诺。于是，伴着古尔邦节宰杀绵羊的情节，哈桑的悲剧犹如那只黑耳朵绵羊的悲剧，他眼睛里有着为了崇高目的而牺牲的坚定。

在神的面前他们同是人，但在现实中，他们的出身就是他们友谊的最大障碍。王子与庶民永远站在不同的位置，他们最初的一点点差异，在社会、教育、舆论的推搡下，犹如蝴蝶效应般渐渐有了千差万别。友谊，经受不起这巨大裂痕而被撕裂——阿米尔偷偷地把钱放在哈桑枕头底下。

哈桑知道阿米尔的想法，他最后一次成全阿米尔的心意——永远离开了阿米尔的家。

长大后生活在如天堂般的美国，远离硝烟弥漫的阿富汗，阿米尔仍然有着挥之不去的愁绪，仍然想着那令他魂牵梦绕的故土，是哈桑，那个最忠于他的奴仆，不，是童年的伙伴，是他最愧对的人，让他的心灵永远处在忏悔与不安中。到后来阿米尔获悉哈桑竟是自己同父异母的兄弟时，悔恨与伤痛纠结于心。

中年的阿米尔偶然得知了哈桑的消息，不顾危险，前往家乡阿富汗，开始了救赎。然而哈桑却再也没有机会听到阿米尔的忏悔了，他死了。

阿米尔最后救回哈桑的儿子索拉博，以之来救赎自己的灵魂。

不论之后阿米尔怎样愧疚怎样赎罪，伤害依然发生过。赎罪唯一改变不了的事实就是罪。而后来哈桑与他同父异母的事实被揭露，不可谓不是一个讽刺。

那么我们，活在相对平等的社会里的我们，是不是就可以坦诚地举起右手发誓自己从未辜负一段友情呢?有些情感并非无法逾越身份等级的鸿沟，而是无法逾越人心。

This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following

Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?

The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane

met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In

dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

毕业以后的三年里，从来没有忘记过读书，有的时候可以在书中看到我自己，随着书中情节变换，心情随之变得喜悦或是忧愁，但是合上书本的时候，一切都又回复了平静，我喜欢这样的感觉。

最近在读《追风筝的人》，终于读完，泪流了……

故事的情节，我不再说了；故事的笔触，也不再表述了；故事的结局，不再评论；故事的巧合，不再追究。

我想说：

我为哈桑和哈桑儿子索拉博的懂事，感到心疼！

我为阿米尔的坦诚感到震惊。

也为阿米尔和哈桑感情的真挚感动！

也为阿米尔最终找到了索拉雅感到欣慰。

毕竟都有各自的归宿。

读到索拉博自杀的情节，眼睛有些模糊了，因为是我不想看到的。或许他的行为感动了“真主”（不知道是否存在），最终结束了从前的生活，人生的轨迹才得以转变。或许在冥冥之中，人生是规划好的，但是没有谁是被注定的，不是吗？

读完这本书，忽然想到一位朋友，一个懂事，给我说出埋藏心中数年的事情，我感动。可是又找不到合适的语言来形容，除了心里的感动，我还能说什么呢？也唯有在心底深深地祝福，祝福历经磨难的人有个好的归宿！快乐健康地生活着！

这是一个关于亲情、友情、爱情、责任的故事。偷窃、救赎、成长，是贯穿全文的三个词语。“为你，千千万万遍”是书中最打动人的一句话，它代表忠诚，真挚的友谊，还有不变的奉献。这本书叫《追风筝的人》，这是一个讲述爱与救赎的故事。

书中讲述了阿富汗富家少爷阿米尔与他父亲仆人的儿子哈桑之间的友情故事。阿米尔和哈桑是好玩伴，阿米尔生性懦弱，为了赢得爸爸的好感在风筝大赛中勇夺冠，哈桑保证追到第二名的风筝，在途中被阿塞夫等人围困在角落里施以暴力与侮辱，阿米尔目睹了一切，但只是蜷缩在阴暗的角落里默默注视。为此，他惭愧不已，无法面对哈桑，最后甚至栽赃他，让他永远离开了这个家。后来，苏联入侵阿富汗，爸爸带着阿米尔逃到白沙瓦，把家留给拉辛汗照看。多年后，阿米尔在美国上大学，毕业后成为了作家并结婚。几年后，身患绝症的拉辛汗从巴基斯坦打电话给阿米尔，让他去救哈桑的儿子索拉博，并告诉了他一个惊人的消息——哈桑是阿米尔爸爸的私生子。阿米尔得知哈桑竟是自己同父异母的兄弟时，他不顾危险，前往家乡阿富汗，得知了哈桑的死讯，他费尽周折找到了哈桑的儿子索拉博，完成了人性的救赎。

这是一个压抑而残忍的故事。哈桑勇敢、善良、忠诚，一直在为阿米尔奉献，但最后却没有一个好的结局——因为种族歧视而被当街枪毙。为了阿米尔能够得到父亲的赞赏，哈桑受到不堪的凌辱;面对阿米尔的污蔑，他和阿里选择离去;当阿米尔的房屋需要看守时，他又毅然选择坚守到被枪杀。但这一切，换来的只有阿米尔无声而懦弱的回避。

这也是一个美丽而充满温情的故事。无论是阿米尔的父亲勇敢地挺身而出，救出差点被敌人欺侮的女同胞，还是为了救出哈桑儿子索拉博而被阿塞夫毒打的阿米尔，抑或是一生默默无闻不求回报的阿里，当然还有忠诚勇敢的哈桑。哈桑的无私、忠诚，爸爸的血性、仁爱，阿米尔的感恩……书中的人们，在战火纷飞的年代，告诉我们人性的珍贵和伟大。

《追风筝的人》译者李继宏曾说：“对阿米尔来说，风筝隐喻他人格中必不可少的部分，只有追到了，他才能成为健全的人，成为他自我期许的阿米尔。”当阿米尔费尽周折，将饱受凌辱的侄子索拉博带回美国，他已经追到了那只风筝。结局并不完美，但这是新的开始，索拉博因精神伤害完全失去感情，唯有说起风筝，才会不自觉地笑起来。曾经，哈桑为阿米尔追风筝，“为阿米尔，千千万万遍。”而现在，阿米尔为哈桑的孩子追风筝，“为哈桑，千千万万遍。”

“我追。一个成年人在一群尖叫的孩子中奔跑。但我不在乎。我追，风拂过我 的脸庞，我唇上挂着一个像潘杰希尔峡谷那样大大的微笑。

”故事的结尾是温馨而唯美的，看着它，我们似乎可以看见为索拉博追逐风筝的阿米尔，似乎，也可以从他的微笑中，窥探到那寻求爱与救赎的心。

每个人生命中都有一只风筝,义无反顾地去奔跑、追逐，在幸福与痛苦的交替中感悟生命的真谛。

The tale of two cities is a historical story， one of Dickens’ long fictions.The background to the novel is the revolution of France .It portrayed a brutal and bloody story ， but it also contained love and friendship.

In the novel， Dickens sarcastically described a typical cruel nobleman—marquis of Evermonde . When he was young he and his brother stole a countrywoman by force and killed her family .What’s worse ， he used his power to imprison Dr Manette ， a kind and honest man who knew all the things they had done and wanted to disclose their crimes . In order to hide their crimes. Marquis of Evermonde and his brother threw Doctor Manette into prison for 18 years . During these 18 years，Doctor Manette lost his freedom and suffer a great in spirit .

I felt unthinkable that Marquis of Evermonde and his brother killed people just as easily as they killed chickens. They deprived other people’s freedom as they liked and they thought it was normal and unremarkable. They had never realized that they had done something wrong or something improper. Because their nature was cruel and evil， like demons. There is an old saying which means： People who commit too many crimes will kill themselves. After all， there is justice in the world. The demons can’t be rampant forever. Because the world will not forgive them. They will pay their lives for their crimes. Let’s see the consequence of the Marquis，’’He lay there like a stone with a knife pushed into his heart.” I think it was just what he ought to gain and it is a real exciting scene.

The Marquis’ death was just the beginning of people’s resistance to the nobleman. Gradually more and more people joined in the revolution. One after another nobleman were sentenced to death and their heads were cut down . However， some innocent people were implicated in the revolution. Charles Darney was one of them He was the nephew of Marquis of Evermonde. To the opposite of his uncle， Darney was a kind and independent young man.

Dickens spoke highly of kindness mercy and love in the novel too. This is the other thone of the novel when Doctor Manette was released from prison. It was his daughter Lucie who took care of him and helped him return to normal. During this time， Dr manette and Lucie knew Charles Darney and Sydeny Carton， the two young man fell in love with Lucie at the same time . At last， Lucie married Chares Darney .Dr Manette accepted Darney as his son-in-law although he knew that Darney was the nephew of the man who threw him into prison for18 years. This is the love between father and daughter. And Sydeny Carton ， the very great man ，loved Lucie deeply. He promised Lucie that he would do everything for her happiness. He did it truely ，he sacrificed himself instead of Darney who looked the same as him. This is love for lovers . This is the most wonderful thing in the world. It also reminds us that no matter how no matter when there is true love existing. At the end ， Lucie， Dr Manette and Darney arrived in England safely.

The tale of two cities is different from other historical fictions. Its characters and main plots are fictional under the real background of the revolution of France. The author made the experience of the fictional charactor Dr Manette as the main clue.The plots are complicated， and they are flexuous and dramatic. The structure is complete and rigorous.

Dickens had dear love and hate. He praised those who ought to be praised and attacked those who ought to be attacked. The motivation of the novel maybe just warn the English dominators. But I think we can learn something meaningful from the tale of two cities.

最近读了法国著名作家小仲马的代表作：《茶花女》，连读两遍，意悠未尽。我被书中男女主人公的爱情故事而感动，读到伤心之处，未免掉泪。

Recently read on behalf of the famous French writer Alexandre Dumass work: "La Traviata", read two times, will you not. I was touched by the book of love stories, read the sad place, it tears.

现代人都想得到真挚的爱情，都想得到异性的真爱，也时刻在讨论什么是爱?是否有真正的爱情?《茶花女》给了我们一个正确的答案：男女之间的情爱，是一种奉献、是一种给予、是一种忠诚，是牺牲、是无私，不是索取，更不是骗取;真心实意的为对方着想，为对方去做事任可牺牲自己的一切，能使对方幸福做为自己最大的快乐和满足。

The modern people want to get true love, want to get specific moments in the discussion of love, but also what is love? If there is true love? "La Traviata" gives us a correct answer: between men and women in love, is a kind of dedication, is a given, is a kind of loyalty, sacrifice, selfless, not to take, but not to cheat; have a genuine and sincere desire for the sake of each other, each other to do any sacrifice everything, can to make each other happy as his greatest pleasure and satisfaction.

我想每个人在通读小说，在为男女主人公悲欢离合而高兴、而担心、而落泪的同时，检讨一下自己在情感方面的得与失，才能更加珍惜自己的爱情，善待亲情和友情。

I think everyone to read novels, and happy, in grief at separation and joy in Union for the hero and heroine and worry, and tears at the same time, to review their own in the emotional aspects of the gain and loss, to cherish their love, treat affection and friendship.

In the sun, I read this thick, childhood, heart suddenly a strange shame and remorse, think of themselves and the lives of a great disparity in Gorky.

Year-old death of his father, to follow the kind of grandmother came to the grandfather"s home. Here, he knows many things, but also see a lot of things, he see the selfish, greedy, brutish, two uncles; simple friend Little Gypsy; mean, stingy, greedy, tyrannical, brutal grandfather; every day life in the cruel, stupid, infighting among family members and arguments, and from between good and evil, Alesha ignorant to understand that a number of reasons.

Compared with him together, our childhood is bright and happy; no pain and struggle, has been a carefree life. From this point on it seems we already have far cry on with Alesha, we have a lot, but we still do not know enough I just want luxury this world a better and more want.

Yes ah, we often parents do not cook, mouth open for food, only to parents for their shelter Guzhao, not herself from the world battles. Now we have to expect should repent, should not waste anything, and learn to cherish everything we have now will suffice.

From now on test, we must stand up and do not just want to experience difficulties with such a withdrawal, escape, or take a shortcut, should have confidence in ourselves, life always something or someone will give you pain and even despair, but we should be like what how the kind of insisted. In this way, you can again find joy in pain, in despair to find hope. Yes, dark past, the dawn will always come, as long as you still maintain the confidence that something is immortal, has all the treasure, then your light will come, because you know how to cherish.

当很多人都在推荐这本书时候我就很好奇这本书写的是什么，为什么那么多人推荐。追风筝的人，代表着什么意思呢?带着疑问我翻开了这本书。

追风筝的人，我终于明白了追风筝的人是什么意思了。虽然译后记里写到：对阿米尔来说，风筝隐喻他人格中不可少的部分，只有追到了，他才能成为健全的人，成为他自我期许的阿米尔。但我更愿意简单的认为，追风筝的人指的就是哈桑，那个陪他一起成长一起放风筝，每次为他追到风筝，在他夺冠那次不惜受辱都要保护那个蓝风筝的哈桑，那个被他背叛的哈桑。风筝，是他童年最美好的回忆，也是最痛的回忆。

索拉博自杀的那一段，我的眼泪止不住的流。为什么，为什么!为什么这么小的小孩子要承受这么多的痛苦，为什么!仅仅只是因为他是哈扎拉人?所以他的父母就要被当众击杀，所以他就要被凌辱，所以他就要被像个玩偶一样在音乐响起的时候必须跳着那滑稽的舞蹈。最近去了一趟南京__纪念馆，日本人对中国人的屠杀让我想起来塔利班对哈扎拉人的屠杀。以前都说爱国，民族振兴，并没有什么太强烈的感觉，感觉那离自己很远，但这一次民族强大的信念第一次那么沉重的击打着我的心灵。对民族信念的麻木终有一天会让南京__重演，或者出现像塔利班对哈扎拉人的屠杀。我们不管在哪，不管变成一个多么优秀或多么糟糕的人，我们都代表着我们血液里流淌的民族。如果这个民族代表着懦弱，无能，我们每个人都是逃脱不了这种声音。所以所有的华人，无论在哪里，都会为这个民族的强大努力着，因为他们也是这个民族的一部分，他们也许不是中国籍，但也改变不了他们是中国人的事实。

全书都写的很压抑，很沉重，唯独与索拉雅的爱情是那么的让人赞许。美妙的一见终情，结婚前的坦诚与包容，婚后无子也坚守的婚姻，已经完全不是阿富汗人的作风，也自由了，也幸福了。虽然有些人说作者在后面有着浓浓的情绪，但面对自由和平的美国和枪弹尸体的阿富汗，我想，作者并不是在拜美，只是对美好生活的一种向往，希望阿富汗的天空能再飘着那么多自由的风筝，让他重新回到那个记忆中的故乡。

导语：《三国演义》是中国四大名著之一。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

Recently I have read a famous Chinese classical novel-The romance of the Three Kingdoms and I felt benefit a lot. Let me tell you about my feelings.

The romance of the Three Kingdoms is one of the four great Chinese master pieces. It was written by Luo Guanzhong, who was born in 1330. It describes nearly 200 characters and tells the story from the late Eastern Han dynasty to the unified of Jin dynasty.

The minute I started to read this book, I was deeply impressed by the sentence at the beginning of the novel: "The empire, long divided, must unite; long united, must divide." It is so philosophical. It reflected the main history of the Three Kingdoms, from the rebellion of the Yellow Turbans to the replacement of the division of the country into Three Kingdoms (Wei, Shu and Wu) by the Jin Dynasty. In these periods, it showed a lot of heroic deeds, and what the heroes did had made a brilliant history. In this novel, the hero I admire mostly is Guan Yu, the general of Shu.

"A man of enormous height, nine spans tall, with a two-foot-long beard flowing from his rich, ruddy cheeks. He had glistening lips, eyes sweeping sharply back like those of the crimson-faced phoenix, and brows like nestling silkworms. His stature was imposing, his bearing awesome." This is Guan Yus appearance. He was called as hero not only because of his handsome looking, but because of his precious characters.

He is the embodiment of loyalty, wisdom and bravery. Once, when Guan Yu was having a battle with Cao Cao (the Master of Wei), he lost connection with Liu Bei(the Master of Shu), and finally he had to surrender because Liu Beis family was with him. Cao Cao appreciated Guan Yus talents, he provided a fabulous palace and lots of money to Guan Yu. Despite Guan Yu was taken good care of in the Cao Cao’s camp, but his heart was still with the Liu Bei’s camp. He had never given up looking for his master. As soon as he got the news of Liu Bei, Guan Yu had forced five passes and slew six captains, finally he found his master. His behavior showed not only his loyalty to his master but also his bravery.

Admittedly, Guan Yus death is also a lamentable. Because of his complacency, he looked down on the army of Wu, lost Jingzhou (an important City), finally, he flopped, and was killed by his personal enemy.

With his personal likes and dislikes, regardless of the consequences, it led to the disruption of the alliance between Wu and Shu, the whole situation was changed greatly.

Guan Yu’s lesson tells us: No matter how talented you are, you’d better remain modest and be humble.

This is a great novel that depicts the countless legendary stories. We can learn not only the characters of the heroes, but also the political and military strategies. It is a best way to experience the profound Chinese ancient culture. Tiancheng(Daniel)Dai

【参考译文】

最近我读了一本著名的中国古典小说>，我觉得受益匪浅。让我告诉你我的感受。

三国演义是中国四大名著之一。这是罗贯中写的，他出生于1330。它描述了近200个字，讲述了从东汉晚期到金朝统一的故事。

从我开始读这本书的那一刻起，我就对小说开头的一句话印象深刻：“帝国，长期分裂，必须团结;长期团结，必须分裂。”。它反映了三个王国的主要历史，从黄巾起义到国家部门更换成三个王国(魏、舒、吴)由晋。在这些时期，它表现了许多英雄事迹，英雄们做了辉煌的历史。在这部小说中，我最敬佩的英雄是舒将军关羽。

一个身材高大，身高九米，长着一二英尺长胡须的男人从他那红润红润的脸颊上流出。他有着闪亮的嘴唇，眼睛像深红色的凤凰一样深深地向后扫着，眉毛像刚开花的蚕。他的身材很高，他的举止令人敬畏.“这是关羽的样子。他之所以被称为英雄不仅是因为他英俊的外表，而是因为他珍贵的品格。

他是忠诚、智慧和勇敢的化身。有一次，当关羽和曹操(魏的主人)发生战斗时，他失去了与刘备(舒的主人)的联系，最后他不得不投降，因为刘备的家人和他在一起。曹操欣赏关羽的才华，他为关羽提供了一座华丽的宫殿和很多钱。尽管关羽在曹操的营地里得到了很好的照顾，但他的心仍然在刘备的营地里。他从未放弃寻找他的主人。关羽一听到刘备的消息，就强行传了五关，打死了六个上尉，最后他找到了他的主人。他的行为不仅表现出他对主人的忠诚，而且表现了他的勇敢。

诚然，关羽的死也是悲惨的。因为他的自满，他看不起吴的军队，失去了荆州(一个重要的城市)，最后，他失败了，并被他的仇人杀死。

他不顾个人好恶，不顾后果，导致吴与舒的同盟破裂，整个局面发生了重大变化。

关羽的教训告诉我们：无论你多么有天赋，你最好保持谦虚和谦虚。

这是一部描写无数传奇故事的伟大小说。我们不仅可以学习英雄人物，而且可以学习政治和军事战略。是体验博大精深的中国古代文化的最佳途径。田成(丹尼尔)

导语：《达·芬奇密码》小说集合了侦探，惊悚和阴谋论等多种风格，并激起了大众对某些宗教理论的普遍兴趣。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

Informal feedbacks and opinions about “The Da Vinci Code”

Okay, at first I have to admit that “The Da Vinci Code” is an amazing book. When I read in mid-parts, sometimes I just wanna to ask, “Okay, okay, what is happening?” It is a horrible period to let an eastern person to understand western religions in sudden. And so, this book basically is in love with the western religion issues.

Honestly, the author is a genius that he organizes plots and conflicts so dramatically and delicately. It’s like a gift. Reading the book is taking a roller coaster, and even worse, your eyes are forced to be close, the world is full of empty black and you got no idea what the railway go next. Everybody seems like suspect. There is absolutely an organization that was killing people and tried to hide something, which is the secret truth. Langdon knows that. Langdon figured the secret organization--priory of Sion at last, and it shows everything is related, the death of Saunière led Langdon all the way to Rossiyn Chapel, with finding “the rose line” the first prime meridian (RGO) that located France, Paris, Louvre. Where the story ends.

I can not understand that why the followers of Christianity and Catholicism would ever think that pain is good for people and human kind is meant to be guilty because they make the “God” or “Guesses Christ” mad or hurt. Actually I am a real big fan of Christopher Hitches, so now you see. The keystones are in great demand. Everybody wants them, and the truth behind of the keystones. They are delish. Christianity and Catholicism want it because it tells where the secret documents that could destroy the religion is. Where the San-greal is. Dramatically, San-greal is not a real cup, but a woman. Mary Magdalene. Mary Magdalene was legend by the wife of Guesses, who born the true blood of royal (Guesses Christ). The conflict only have one aim that are the keystones and behind of them, which is the San-greal. The plot descripts different personality well, and discovers the characteristics behind different force that was struggling the San-greal distinctly. In order to understand what is happening, and what are the symbols, characters, numbers really mean, and understand why the followers of the religion will be so obsessed, the reader have to place himself in the version of a total western guy, or a follower. Because of the different believe probably, I could not comprehend some of the strange behaviors (I mean they are weirdoes) that author described in story, but as a horror plus suspense fiction, I think “The Da Vinci Code” is better then “Sherlock Homes”.

I quite enjoy the reading, and thanks for the ones that borrow the book to me.

【参考译文】

“达文西密码”的非正式反馈与意见

首先，我必须承认“达文西密码”是一本了不起的书。当我在中间阅读时，有时我只想问：“好吧，发生了什么事?“让东方人突然了解西方宗教是一段可怕的时期。所以，这本书基本上是爱上了西方宗教问题。

老实说，作者是一个天才，他组织情节和冲突如此戏剧性和微妙。这就像一个礼物。读这本书是坐过山车，更糟糕的是，你的眼睛被迫关闭，世界充满了空黑色，你不知道什么是铁路去下一步。每个人似乎都怀疑。绝对有一个组织在杀害人们，试图隐藏一些东西，这就是秘密的真相。兰登知道。兰登认为，秘密组织——锡安隐修会在最后，它表明一切都是相关的，对sauniè重新死亡导致兰登一直到Rossiyn Chapel，找到“玫瑰线”第一本初子午线(RGO)，位于法国，巴黎，Louvre。故事结束的地方。

我不明白为什么基督教和天主教的信徒会认为痛苦是对人有益的，而人类是注定有罪的，因为他们使“上帝”或“猜测基督”疯狂或伤害。其实我是一个真正的Christopher Hitches的球迷，所以现在你看到的。重点是需求量很大。每个人都希望他们背后的真相，并重点。他们是美味。基督教和天主教希望它，因为它告诉的秘密文件，可以破坏宗教是。在三真是。戏剧性的是，三大是不是一个真正的杯，但一个女人。Mary Magdalene。Mary Magdalene是传说的猜测妻子，谁出生的皇家皇家血(猜测基督)。冲突的目标只有一个，为重点，在他们的背后，是三大。剧情描述了不同的个性，不同的特点，找出背后的力量，挣扎着的三大明显。为了了解发生了什么，什么是符号，人物，数字真的意味着，并理解为什么信徒的宗教将如此痴迷，读者必须把自己在版本的总西方家伙，或追随者。因为不同的相信，我不能理解一些奇怪的行为(我的意思是他们是怪物)，作者描述的故事，但作为一个恐怖加悬疑小说，我认为“达文西密码”比“家园”。

我很喜欢阅读，感谢那些借我的书。