小升初英语个写作简单技巧【精彩20篇】

说明文是一种以说明为主要表达方式的文体。它是对客观事物的性状、特点、功能和用途等做科学地说明。它既不像记叙文那样重在记叙、描写和抒情，也不像议论文那样，重在阐明主张，批驳谬论。说明文通过说明客观事物，使人增长知识和技能。怎么写说明文比较好呢?下文是小编整理的相关内容，欢迎阅读参考!

一、要抓住事物的特征

一篇说明文写得好不好，主要看它有没有抓住事物的特征。写出来是不是使读者得到具体而明确的认识。比如，你参观了动物园，要向小读者介绍长颈鹿。什么是长颈鹿的主要特征呢?跑得快，斑纹美丽，这些都不是长颈鹿独具的特点。长颈鹿最主要的特征是脖子长。

那么，怎样去抓特征呢?

首先，要细致观察。文章是客观事物的反映，只有深入细致观察，才能对事物了解得清楚。

其次，要查阅资料。我们不能事事亲身经历，而说明文又要求特征准确。材料翔实，这就需要查阅有关的资料，靠前人总结出来的经验来印证。

最后。还要学会比较。世界上没有绝对相同的两片树叶。孪生兄弟，长得再相似，也能区别。抓住事物的特征，就是抓住这个事物区别于其他事物的不同特点，从共性中发现个性，从一般中找到特殊。事物的特征往往在同别的事物相比较中显示出来。比如，要说明中国是一个大国，这个“大”字就很有学问。你可以直接说，中国的面积有九百六十万平方公里，也可以用比较的方法来说明。中国的面积，与法国比，有十七个法国大;与日本比，有二十五个日本大;与英国比，有三十九个英国大;我们祖国的面积，相当于整个欧洲。这样一比较，既具体，又生动，很有说服力。

总之。要抓住说明对象的特征，一方面靠亲身实践，细致观察。另一方面又要善于向书本和有经验的人学习，同时还要周密思考。学会比较，努力去熟悉所要说明的事物。

二、说明要有条理

要想写好一篇说明文，除了要抓住事物的特征外，还要掌握事物本身的条理。依据事物本身的条理来说明，行文线索要清楚，层次要分明，不能想到哪里。写到哪里。说明文有两种，一种是说明具体事物，如介绍一种新品种;一种是说明抽象事物，如“什么是世界”?

说明具体事物的文章，可以由上到下，由前到后，由外到内，由主到次地写，使读者容易了解各部分的相互关系。有的同学在介绍具体事物的时候，没有事先根据这些事物的相互关系理清脉络，归纳分类，结果往往容易出现关系凌乱、层次不清的毛病。

说明抽象事物的文章，不但要说明事物是“这样的”，而且要进一步说明“为什么会这样”。这就要按照人们认识事物的规律，步步深入地加以说明，或由浅入深，或由表及里，或由具体到抽象，或由原因到结果，或由现象到本质，或由数量到质量，或由特殊到一般等等。例如，鸟为什么会飞?人为什么会做梦?都属于这一类。如果是说明事物的变化发展过程。可以按照时间的顺序。如果属于介绍生产技术，可以按照生产的程序。只有按照事物本身的条理，来确定说明的顺序。文章才能写得眉目清楚。

三、说明文的语言要确切、简洁、通俗

确切：要求语言要确切。用词准确，不能夸大和缩小。

简洁：语言简洁，就是精炼，干净利落，用尽可能少的话，把事物说清楚，不要罗嗦重复、拖泥带水。比如“大雪把铁路淹没无踪”：“下水游泳应注意些什么”，这两句话中的“无踪”和“下水”都是重复多余的话，应该删去。

通俗：语言通俗，就是运用群众中明白通顺的话，把本来是抽象的概念说得具体生动，把本来深奥的道理说得浅显易懂。例如：庄稼有了化学朋友，就不怕生物界敌人的进攻了。

[写作技巧：说明文

下面是小编收集的小学生写人的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

作文是写人记事的，或多或少都要写到人，而那些专门写人物的作文如何才能写好呢?要写好一个人物，无外乎是写人物的语言、行动、外貌(肖像)、心理等等。鲁迅先生说：“人物语言的描写，能使读者由说话看出人来。”这说明人物语言的重要。此外，写人物的行动、外貌(肖像)、心理等，也是必不可少的惯常写法，同样重要。

下面我就自己的感受和经验谈几点切实可用的方法或注意点：

首先，要写好人物作文，就要写自己熟悉的人。只有自己熟悉的人，才能感受得最真切最鲜活，对他(她)的一言一行，一颦一笑，才能有最直接的、深刻的印象。如下面例文《我是你爹》(见后文)，写的是作者非常熟悉的人，所以全文写来既栩栩如生，又给人非常亲切的感觉。如果你写一个陌生的人，虽然也能够写，但写出来的就可能毫无特色，会是千千万万个中的一个，这样写来不要说感动别人，有时就连自己都觉得别扭、生造。

其次，要凸显人物与众不同的个性。共性的东西人人都有，写得再多作用也是不大的。只有有特色的、独具个性魅力的东西，才能给人以冲击，才能给人留下深刻的印象，才能让人拍案称奇。

第三，不要什么都写，更不要事无巨细地写，要择其一二浓彩重墨地写。这当然是要根据主题需要去择取了，决不能无的放矢。如《我是你爹》中，“爹”的话语很少，前后加起来总共才三四句而已，可一个独特的“爹”的形象却跃然纸上了。

第四，要让人物的言行、心理、个性特征等符合人物的年龄、经历、身份、文化教养等特点。不要让一个两三岁的孩子说六十岁人的话，也不要让一个无文化的老太太专说些理论大话等，否则就是无视人物的年龄、经历、身份、文化教养等特点而乱写人物，是不能写好人物的，更谈不上写出个性特点了。

第五，写人物离不开写事、写细节。要仔细地观察人物的日常行为，挖掘他们的典型事例，而且事例要新颖，因为人物的性格和品质，是通过具体的事例表现出来的。比如我们要写一个热心肠的人，就要写他怎样帮助周围的人，或哪里有困难他就在哪里出现等事例。写事的时候，我们完全可以从细节方面入手。细节描写包括对人物的动作、语言、神态和心理活动以及特定的环境等的描写。描写一个人的时候，我们要把这个人的每一个能体现人物特点的动作都描写清楚、具体、详细。

我们来看这一段话：“回到教室，大家全都涌到郭枫面前，问：”坏小子，你捐一毛钱怎么能代表我们呢?‘郭枫眨了眨眼，骄傲地说：“其实我捐了100元!说捐一毛钱，那是逗你们玩的!’听了郭枫的话，同学们哭笑不得……”这一段话把细节描写得很好，“眨了眨眼”“骄傲地说”“哭笑不得”等词语把“郭枫”可气又可笑的性格描写得淋漓尽致。

写人，是小学作文训练的基本功之一。在记叙文中，人和事是不可分的，关键是看题目如何要求。要求写事的题目，文中的人要为事服务;要求写人的题目，文中的事必须为人服务。写人为主的记叙文，就是要通过一件或几件事，来表现人物一种或多种品质。写人的继续文，叙事不要求完整;记事的记叙文，虚实要求完整，而且要贯穿文章始终。

(一)通过一件事来写人

通过一件事来写人，通常是表现人物的一种品质或性格的一个方面。为了刻画人物，对所写人物必须进行必要的外貌、语言、动作、心理等方面的描写。但是，从以事写人这个角度来说，最好是选择一件最能反映此人某一特点的事，并把这件事写好。 在写事情的时候，要选择典型的事例。所谓典型，就是能集中反映中心思想的事，能够表现人物的好思想、好品质、美好情感的事。对小学生来说，选择典型事例，要着眼于小事，选择那些最能反映深刻意义的小事。这样的事表面上看，都是普普通通的凡人小事，但是其中却蕴涵着深刻的意义，这就是我们常说的"小中见大"。

(二)通过几件事写人

可以分成两种情况：以是用几件事表现某个人的一种品质;二是用几件事表现某个人的多种品质。 要注意：用几件事写人，这些事可以是完整的，作者必须把事情发生的时间、地点、人物、事件(起因、经过、结果)，一一交代清楚，也可以是不完整的，只着重于某几点进行叙述。更多的是在一篇文章中，有的事详写;有的事略写;有的事要求写得比较完整，有的事要求写得比较简单。 通过几件事写人，同样要对人物进行必要的外貌、行动、语言、心理的描写。

(三)学会刻画人物

写人的文章要会在叙事的过程中，对最能表现人物思想感情、性格特点的外貌、语言、动作、心理活动等方面进行描写，也就是学会刻画人物。

1. 也叫肖像描写，是通过对人物的容貌、神情、衣着、姿态、语调、外貌特征的描写。来揭示人物性格的一种方法。人物的的外貌和人物内心世界密切的联系，具体说：通过外貌描写，使人物的形象更丰满，能给读者留下深刻印象;通过外貌描写，揭示人物的身份;通过外貌描写，展示人物在特定场合的内心世界;通过外貌描写，表现人物性格、精神面貌和思想品质。

总之，外貌描写要和表现人物特点、突出文章的中心思想紧密配合。外貌描写要传神，切忌脸谱化，反对那种部分主次，从头写到脚、千人一貌的写法。

2. 语言描写有对话和独白两种。

对话是两个人或几个人的谈话;独白是人物的自言自语。语言是人物内心世界的直接表露，对表现人物的思想性格起重要作用。有个性特点的语言可以起到"闻其言，见其人"的作用。语言描写要注意以下两点：一是文章中人物的语言要精心筛选，把那些足以能表现人物的个性特点、最能表现中心思想的语言，写进文章中;二是好的语言描写，一定是符合当时的情景，符合人物的性格、身份、性别、年龄和文化修养等方面的特点。 对话描写有四种形式：说的话写在后面，说话人后面用引号;说的话在前，说话人写在后，用引号、句号;前后各引一句或几句，中间交代谁说的，用逗号;只写人物语言，不写说话人。这四种形式要根据实际需要灵活事业，避免行文死板。

3. 动作描写

是通过人物的行动、动作，来表现人物的思想性格的一种方法。一个人的行为、动作，往往是他的思想感情、性格特征的最真实的外化。看一个人，不仅要听他怎么说，更要卡他如何做，正所谓"听其言，观其行"，因此，动作描写是直接刻画人物形象，展示人物精神面貌，把人物写"活"的重要手段。那么，怎样描写人物的动作呢?

首先，要选择关键性的动作来写。一个人做事的时候，会有许多动作。但他们不可能、也没有必要把这些动作一个不少地都写出来。这就要求选择那些关键性的、最有意义的动作来写。

其次，要写准确。同一个动作可以用很多动词来表示，但只有那些有特色，最能反映人物气质的动词，才能把人写"活"。有一位作家说过，最难的不是写动作，而是写出有特点的动作，从动作中写出人来。

4.心理描写

心理的人物内心的活动，是无声的语言。人物内心世界，指人物内心的喜、哀、乐、忧伤、犹豫、嫉妒、向往等复杂的感情。在写人的文章中，恰当地描写人物心理，可以更有效地刻画人物，突出中心思想。心理描写的要求是：要真实，要有根据;人物的心理变化要自然，合情合理;心理描写要为文章的中心思想服务;在描写人物的心理活动时，要客观、谨慎，不能以己之心，度人之意。

小学生作文时，大多采用第一人称("我"活"我们")，采用这种人称作文，就不能用"他想" 的形式来写人物的心理活动，因为"我"不可能钻到别人的脑子里去看。此时，可以换一种方式--在描写人物的语言、神态、动作上下功夫，这样可能更合情理，使人感到真实可信。

心理描写除了用"我想"之外，还可以采用以下几种方法。

(1)提出问题，引入所想的内容。

(2)使用假设，流露心理活动。

(3)字里行间，流露着"想"。

(4)直接抒发心中所想。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

导语：套用一些英语作文模板可以得到分数的提高哦!下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的相关英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

Some people contend that ... has proved to bring many advantages (disadvantages)

有些人认为________有很多有利之处(不利之处)。

Those who argue for ... say that ...economic development of the cities.

觉得_____的人认为，______ 城市的经济发展。

Some people advocate that ....

有些人在坚持认为_________。

They hold that ... 他们认为_________。

People, who advocate that ..., have their sound reasons (grounds)

坚持认为______的人也有其说法(依据)。

Those who have already benefited from practicing it sing high praise of it.

那些从中受益的人对此大家褒奖。

Those who strongly approve of ... have cogent reasons for it.

强烈认同_______的人有很多原因。

Many people would claim that...

有人会认为___________。

Just as the saying goes: "so many people, so many minds". It is quite understandable that views on this issue vary from person to person.

俗话说，""。不同的人对此有不同的看法是可以理解的。

To this issue, different people come up with various attitudes.

对于这个问题，不同的人持不同的观点。

There is a good side and a bad side to everything, it goes without saying that...

万事万物都有其两面性，所以，勿庸置疑，____________。

When it comes to ..., most people believe that ..., but other people regard ...as ....

提到_________问题，很多人认为_________，不过，一些人则认为______是____.

When faced with...., quite a few people claim that ...., but other people think as...

提到_________问题，仅少数人认为________，但另一些人则认为_________。

热点素材引入作文，既能使文章内容富有时代气息，又能彰显考生对社会的关注，因而受到阅卷老师的好评。小编收集了高考作文写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

招法一：小处切入，专注—点

热点素材，往往影响很大，涉及面广。我们必须从小处入手，寻找与作文主题相关的“点”，切忌面面俱到。如高考广东卷优秀作文《回到原点》片段：

头顶灰白的天空，翻过尘土飞扬的马路。我终于可以停下脚步，伫立在那熟悉又陌生的巷口。我知道，只要再迈一步，我便回到我人生的“原点”——那条打从我一出生便孕育我的老巷。那条充满西关风情，予我人生第一课的老巷。

踏着青石板路，我缓缓步入巷的深处。映入眼帘的是久违的西关老屋。深红的趟栊门前是三级浅平的石阶，某户人家的家猫正慵懒地躺在石阶上，享受正午到来前温和的阳光。

【解析】“回到原点”这个话题，可以选择的角度众多。本片段只是从小处着手，选取了作者熟悉的一个生活场景，这也是我们熟悉的画面，贴近读者生活，激发了阅读兴趣，引出了下文的思考。

招法二：概括热点，提炼主题

对于大家耳熟能详的事件，没有必要再做详细叙述，取而代之的应是对事件本身的高度概括，进而提炼出主题或结论。如高考大纲卷的优秀作文《没有人是一座孤岛》的片段：

顺手的小事，彰显的不只是一种向善的习惯，更是道德社会的脊梁。被“彭宇案”“许云鹤案”吓怕了的十八位路人，竟忍心看着可怜的小悦悦遭受两次车轮碾轧之苦却不敢只是顺手地将她拉到一边。冰冷的雨滴拍打的不仅是小悦悦摔倒下的那块土地，更是十几亿国人冷漠的心。还好，还好有人愿意伸手，还好有善良的拾荒阿婆陈贤妹愿意拉小悦悦一把。她这一拉，不仅是将小悦悦拉出濒临死亡的边缘，更是将我们这些旁观者拉出道德滑坡的冷漠世界。

一个拾荒者，有的却是超越众人的至善至美。她的善，不是惊天动地的英雄壮举，却足以使冷漠的灵魂为之震颤;她的美，不是沉鱼落雁闭月羞花，却足以让每个人都为她的魅力所折服。

【解析】考生由材料中修船工顺手补洞的善举，写到拾荒阿婆陈贤妹、十八位路人，因为这一事件影响极大，所以作者并未描述事件细节，而是高度概括，将重点放在了议论上面。

招法三：再现情景，抒发真情

热点素材若细节展示得并不充分，也有可能缺乏感人至深的力量。我们可以精选某些细节，再现情景，抒发自己的真情实感。如高考四川卷优秀作文《致张丽莉老师》的片段：

一切都来得如此突然，校车突然启动，学生惊慌失措，呆若木鸡。司机也惊呆了。可是他们看到了让他们更吃惊的一幕。您用自己的血肉之躯勇敢地迎上去，坦然地扑向那个庞然大物。在高大的校车面前，您是如此的渺小和微不足道。但是就是这样的渺小，却迸发出了惊人的力量，您“轻易”地推开了两个手足无措已经吓瘫的孩子。车轮肆意地从您的腿上碾过。学生得救了，您高位截瘫。

【解析】在叙述的人称选择上，作者选取了第二人称，既便于抒情，又便于说理。在叙事内容上，考生用情景再现的方式进行细节描写，在叙事真实生动的基础之上，增加了震撼人心的力量。

〖备考佳作〗考题 谈“才”与“德”

女子有才方是德

黄晓豪

“女子无才便是德”出自清代张岱的《公祭祁夫人文》，传统道德规范认为妇女无须有才能，“三从四德”才是好女人的标准。(开头引用古人观点，并加以评析，欲扬先抑。)

到了以中国男权为主的封建社会时期，为了达到更方便、更深刻压迫妇女的目的，“女子无才便是德”这一说法便迅速宣传开来。

当今社会追求的是“平等”。摒除压迫、反对压迫。因此“女子无才便是德”这一说法在当今社会必然是行不通的，反而“女子有才”则更适合当今社会。(适时亮出自己观点。)就拿相夫教子来说，一个有才华、智慧和理想追求的女子，更有助于家庭的和睦和下一代的成长。

阿里巴巴集团的创始人马云有如今的成就，离不开他妻子的竭力帮助和全力支持。马云就曾说过：“她(马太太)对我的帮助是全方位的，无论是事业上还是生活上，她都是全力理解和支持。”马云的妻子无疑也是个非常有才能的人，所以在接受采访时，马云才会颇为得意地说：“她不是那种真正的默默无闻型的女人，她的事业发展得很好，她是事业和生活双全的女人。”也正因为马太太“有才”，才能给马云事业上的帮助，铸就马云今天的辉煌。反之，倘若马太太没有任何才能，一无可取，她又以何以帮助马云?(选取热点人物马云，叙述相关事件，详写。)

李彦宏的妻子马东敏是一名博士，她的才能之显著是不容置疑的。她对李彦宏事业上的帮助就像推助器对机器的帮助。李彦宏曾经承认自己并不是一个喜欢冒险开拓的人，是他的妻子给了他勇气。在曼哈顿举行的大型庆祝晚会上，李彦宏就对马东敏赞赏有加，他深情地说：“她总能在最关键的时刻。冷静地提出最勇敢的建议。而事实证明她的那些充满东方智慧的建议，将我引上了正确的道路。”他还感激地说：“在百度的冒险创业历程中，每一步都是她推着我向前走的。”(选取热点人物李彦宏。叙述相关事件，详写。)

马东敏在事业上凭什么能对李彦宏有如此大的帮助呢?当然是凭着她过人的智慧和才能。

在现在这个追求平等的社会里，应该不能说一个人一无是处、一无所知，只需虔诚地接受别人对自己命运的安排便是德吧!在这个竞争激烈的社会里，无才，终将会被这个社会淘汰。

从众多事实来看，如著名作家巴尔扎克、体操王子李宁、SOHO公司的董事长潘石屹，都有一个十分有才能的妻子。而她们本身，也都拥有自己的成功人生。(略写，列举了丰富的材料。)

再从整个社会现象来看，“女子无才便是德”的说法也毫无正确性可言。而“女子有才”却更能适应时代的变迁，更能促进社会的进步，更有助于家庭的幸福和谐。因此，女子有才方是德。

【评析】本文不仅立意新颖，角度独特，所选素材也紧扣时代，拉近了与读者的距离，也有利于观点的证明。

古人写文章很讲究开头，称之“凤头”，西方的谚语也这样说：好的开头是成功的一半。

开头的方法有很多，如比喻开头法(山如眉黛，小屋恰似眉梢的痣一点。——《我的空中楼阁》)、引言开头法(鲁迅先生有两句诗：“横眉冷对千夫指，俯首甘为孺子牛。”这是他自己的写照，也是他作为伟大作家的全部人格的体现)、议论开头法(生命是一个选择的过程。在这过程中，有人“利”字为先，好处抢尽;有人“荣”字当前，虚实兼收;亦有人“德”字为重，铁肩道义。)、入物开头法(很久很久以前，也许在我的生命之树发芽的时候，我的生命之神就告诉我，我是一只火凤凰。那时幼稚的心灵无法参透凤凰的含义，长大了也是。)、写人开头法(夏日炎炎。鲁林从省城公安大学放假回家，来到A城地面，此地距离其老家梁山泊尚有一段路程，须乘班车，方可上路。)、叙事开头法(一年夏天，我和妻坐着海轮到了一个有名的岛上。——鲁彦《听潮》)、描景开头法(陌生的山花已有无数的开了。冷月下，却只见一犁春水，蓦然回首，总是充盈着泪水的双眼遥望寂灭的星空，总是随风飘动的思绪感叹树叶的凋零。——一考生《美丽一次》)、绘境开头法(十五那天，天热得发了狂。太阳刚一出来，地上已经像下了火。一些似云非云，似雾非雾的灰气低低地浮在空中，使人觉得憋气。——老舍《在烈日和暴雨下》)、定情开头法(我与父亲不相见已二年有余了，我最不能忘记的是他的背影。——朱自清《背影》)。

但究竟如何开头需要因文而定，因人而定，“文有定法，文无定法”就是这个问题。只要能够使阅卷者更好地理解和把握文章，且富有感染力和吸引力，就是成功的文章开头。

写作是最灵活的一种测试形式。写自己提前准备的表达是提分最有效的利器。下面是语文迷为大家提供的高分英语写作方法，希望对你有帮助。

一、“功能段落”突破CET写作

“To be or not to be: that is a question。”莎士比亚如是说。冲刺阶段，背模板还是不背?我的答案：背，但绝不是盲目地背。

整篇背诵模板不是最有效的方法，因为模板的写作思路是固定的，然而很多时候试题的命题思路可能与所背模板思路不同。因此，可能导致“所背非所考”，甚至导致文不对题，生搬硬套。

但是，无论四六级写作话题如何变化，一般都对应三个或两个汉语提纲。只要按提纲要求去写相应的内容段落，就做到了紧扣主题。历年写作提纲可以总结为六种功能段落：现象描述、危害分析(弊)、原因分析、建议措施、观点阐述(观点的本质为利弊：支持方观点等于分析“利”，反方观点等于分析“弊”)、意义阐述(利)。

下面，结合近年真题展示功能段落内容：

2011-06：Online Shopping

1.现在网上购物已成为一种时尚

2.网上购物有很多好处，但也有不少问题

3.我的建议

解析：本次四级作文对应四个段落分别是：现象、观点(利、弊)和建议。该类作文可以被称之为：观点对比型作文，对比的内容重点在利弊分析上。

2010-12：How Should Parents Help Children to Be Independent?

1. 目前不少父母为孩子包办一切

2. 为了让孩子独立， 父母应该……

解析：该题目只有两个提纲：现象和建议，可以添加一个功能段落：原因。这样这篇作文就是“三段论”的形式：提出问题(负面现象描述)、分析问题(原因)、建议措施段。2010年6月CET也属于该种那类型。

2009-12：Creating a Green Campus

1. 建设绿色校园很重要

2. 绿色校园不仅指绿色的环境……

3. 为了建设绿色校园，我们应该……

解析：该段对应提纲如下：意义阐述(即分析：利或好处)、现象描述(解释绿色校园环境之外的因素)、建议措施段。

综合以上分析，六种功能段落已经涵盖住了以上考试的所有提纲。因此，如果能够掌握住六种功能段落的写作实际就掌握了四六级考试写作考题的最本质特征。那样的话，无论题目如何变化，我们准备都是有的放矢的。反观，死背模板容易导致生搬硬套，甚至文不对题。

二、写作短期提分方略

在了解了四六级考试在命题特点的基础上，考生在冲刺阶段最需要准备的是两个内容：思路和表达。思路解决怎么写的问题，表达解决写什么的问题。如果拿到一个作文题目，你知道应该按照什么思路去写，又知道应该写什么表达，这篇作文就已经成功了一半。

思路点拨：在本人所讲授的基础班、强化班、精品班等不同班型上都曾讲授到现象、原因、建议、利弊、观点分析时的逻辑：“一个中心，四个基本点”。具体内容：“以孩子(学生、事件)为中心，以家长[微博](老师、相关人员)、家庭(学校、管理机构)、社会、法规(道德意识)为基本点”。

试举例说明：以2010年12月真题为例，主题为子女教育话题。谈到子女，必然涉及到家长，孩子和家长组成家庭，千千万万的家庭组成社会，是什么在维护着社会稳定?法规和道德意识。这样我们就找到了可以入手去分析的五个方面：孩子、家长、家庭、社会、法规道德意识。如何使用这五个方面?比如分析家长溺爱孩子原因时至少可以从家长意识、家庭结构变化、社会背景角度去分析。

同理，2010年6月话题为学生英语学习，可从学生自身、教师教学、学校教学政策角度去分析。那么，如果主题不是孩子也不是学生，怎么分析?2011年6月主题为网络购物，分析时就以该事件为中心，可以想到相关人或物(买方：customers/clients/shoppers;卖方：online shops/stores;中间方：支付宝、淘宝等)，其管理机构(政府)、社会背景，相关法规是否健全等。

“一个中心，四个基本点”的分析逻辑形成一种立体化网状结构，考生运用该思维模式，只要能想到其中两到三点，思路问题即可迎刃而解。建议童鞋们首先将该思路背诵下来，以备将来可以在考场上灵活应用。

表达积累

表达分为四个层次：词句段篇。其中篇章层面只要按照提纲要求去组织文章即可，因此篇章方面不足为虑。段落方面按照“功能段落”的六种形式去识别，也小菜一碟。

词和句是表达的基本元素，也是语言质量的根本体现。在新东方教书的这几年中和参加四六级考试阅卷的经历中，看过无数学生的作文，深感学生词句方面能力的薄弱。同时结合过往教学中的成功案例，提出冲刺阶段表达积累的高效途径。

背写：思路+表达

很多同学考前也在背，背的滚瓜烂熟，脱口而出，觉得自己水平很牛!上了考场也顺利将文章写了出来，却得了一个很低的分数，为什么?因为单词都拼错了。冲刺阶段，请牢记：口头背诵得再好不等于能够写对。背写是提高写作和翻译唯一也是最有效的方法。

那么，背写什么内容哪?答案是思路和表达。思路上文中已有论述，遣词和造句的表达方面应该紧密结合功能段落来背诵有效句式和用词。考生不必刻意追求适用难词，但可以将常见词汇稍作替换：如，

exceedingly, extremely, intensely替换very;an army of/a great many/a host of 替换a lot of;advancement 替换 development; positive, favorable, promising(有希望的)， perfect, pleasurable, excellent, outstanding, superior替换good; give rise to, lead to, result in, trigger 替换cause; harbor the idea that, take the attitude that, hold the view that替换think; beneficial, rewarding替换helpful; bear in mind that替换remember; enjoy, possess替换have; shopper, client, consumer, purchaser替换customer……

表达精彩体现在三个方面：遣词、造句、连贯。大家可以结合以下例文感受这三个方面：

Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minute to write a short essay on the topic of To Help or Not to Help. You should write at least 120 words following the outline given bellow:

1. 帮助别人是一种美德

2. 但是帮助陌生人容易使自己陷入麻烦

3. 我的看法

首段阐述意义：In contemporary society, it should be a virtue for individuals to offer help to those who are in need. Without this morality, it is impossible for the society to be named “Harmony”. Apparently enough, it is of great importance/ significance/ value/ benefits for people to help each other, especially in difficulties。

二段描述负面现象：However, a host of people find it hard or troublesome to offer helps to strangers. We have been frequently informed that(A typical example is that) a warmhearted man —who lends a hand to an old lady—gets himself in trouble. Since helping others may trigger trouble, a few people refuse to offer help timely. And if we let/allow this situation to continue as it is now, we would not know where civilized society will be in the forthcoming future。

尾段我的看法或建议：As college students, we should bear in mind this virtue. However, it is essential that regulations should be worked out to support this virtue. In addition, it is suggested that we should offer aid to strangers in a safe way, such as dialing 12o or 110 for help. If we try our utmost to do so, the future of our society/ civilization will be promising, hopeful and rosy. (以上范文字数为202词，请自己酌情删减即可)

三、冲刺复习安排建议

总体原则：先背再写、阶段总结、适当模拟。

先背再写：基础较差同学一定要先背一些功能句式和教材相关范文，然后模仿该作文的思路和表达去写。背写的目的是积累语言表达实力，同时练习书写的公正和优美。建议书写较差的考生买本英语字帖练一下书写，也许你会有意外的惊喜。

阶段总结：每过一周就要问自己几个问题：所背诵的表达可以用来写什么类型的文章?该类文章的相关词汇或表达有什么?关键词如何避免重复?请记住：没有复习，没有巩固。

适当模拟：在熟练掌握背写了六种功能段落的思路和表达之后，可以结合适当题目在写作中运用所讲所背所总结提分词汇、句式。建议大家能够灵活运用，做到一例多用。比如我在多个班上讲过的关于英语学习的话题作文，可以写13次四级考试的作文。

题目：On English Learning

提纲：1. 英语学习很重要;2. 英语者所面临的困难;3. 如何学好英语

In contemporary world, English learning has gained great popularity and it is of great significance. (主题句) Firstly, based on a survey, a majority of tourists acknowledge that they prefer to speak English when traveling around the world. (调查法表述)Secondly, compared with the poor English speakers, good English-speakers are superior in many ways. (比较模板句式)

However, English learners may have a variety of difficulties or troubles in their learning. (主题句) For example, it can be noticed that a large number of students have difficulty memorizing words. Sometimes, it is difficult for them to understand the rules of grammar. In addition, though some are good at reading or writing, they can not express themselves freely in English。

Then, how to get a good command of (学好) this language? I am convinced that practice makes perfect. Only practice can enable one to speak and write fluently. And it is also through practice that one can master the rules of grammar and remember words, and there is no other way. (强调句式)

下面是小编为大家收集整理的记叙文的写作技巧，欢迎大家阅读参考!

怎样记叙好一件简单的事呢?

1、要交代清楚事情发生的地点、时间;要把事情的经过、因果写明白。一件事，总离不开时间、地点、人物、事件、原因、结果等六个方面的内容，因此，只有把这些方面写清楚了，才能使别人明白你写了一件什么事。

然而，交代这六个方面内容不应该呆板，要根据文章的需要灵活掌握。时间、地点也并不是非要直接点明不可的，有时候可以通过描述自然景物的特征及其变化，将它们间接表示出来。如“鸡喔喔叫了起来”，就是指天将亮了;“西边的太阳就要落山了”，指的是傍晚，等等。

2、要把事情经过写具体，并做到重点突出。在记叙文六个方面的内容中，起因、经过和结果，是构成事情最主要的环节。为了把事情写得清楚、明白，在记叙中一定要写好事情的起因、经过和结果，特别要把事情的经过写具体，给人留下完整而深刻的印象。

3、记叙的条理要清晰。一件事都有发生、发展和结果的过程，按照事情发展的顺序记叙，文章的条理就会清楚明白。

确定记叙的顺序以后，还要安排好段落层次。适当地分段，可以使文章眉目清楚。要做到记叙的条理分明，必须在动笔之前，仔细地想一想，文章应该先写什么，再写什么，然后写什么，把记叙的轮廓整理出来。写记叙文，必须考虑哪些先写，哪些后写，安排好记叙的顺序，否则就会头绪杂乱，条理不清。

那么，怎样安排记叙顺序才能使文章条理清楚呢?

1、运用顺叙。

顺叙，是按照事物发生、发展的先后次序进行叙述。这样写，可以将事物的发展过程，有头有尾地叙述出来，来龙去脉，十分清楚。运用顺叙写成的文章，它的层次、段落和事物发生、发展的过程是基本一致的。

顺叙有以时间为顺序的，有以事物发展规律为顺序的，也有以空间变换为顺序的。在叙事性的文章中，大多是以时间为顺序和以事物发展规律为顺序的。

按时间顺序进行叙述时，必须严格地安排好顺序，写清楚叙述的时间。现实生活中任何事情都不会突然发生，它总有一个发生、发展的过程。因此，作者常常要根据事情发生、发展、高潮、结局这一事情发展的规律来进行叙述，文章的层次也是清楚、明了的。

当然，有的文章事情比较简单，因而不一定非要写出事情过程的四个层次(发生、发展、高潮、结局)。

2、运用倒叙。

倒叙，就是把事件的结局或某个最突出的片断提在前面叙述，然后再从事件的开头进行叙述。

需要指出的是，运用倒叙的写法，必须注意交代清楚倒叙的起讫点，顺叙和倒叙的转换处要有明显的界限、必要的文字过渡。这些地方处理不好，会使文章脉络不清，头绪不明，影响内容的表达。

3、运用插叙。

插叙是指在叙述中心事件的过程中，由于某种需要暂时中断叙述的线索而插入的关于另一件事情的叙述。

需要指出的是，在运用插叙时不能打乱原来的叙述线索，要注意与上下文的衔接。这样，文章的结构不仅富有变化，而且叙述事情的条理非常清楚。

写作练习：旅游活动（中段考范文）

【单元财富运用】

假定你是李华，上周末和家人开车去大角湾度假。请你根据以下要点，给你的美国朋友Tom介绍你的旅游经历。

1. 出发时间：周六早上7点；

2. 准备物品：零食、衣服、相机等；

3. 旅游活动：游泳，欣赏海水、海滩、日出和日落等美景，吃海鲜，买纪念品；

4. 你的感受。

【注意】：1. 词数100；

2. 开头已给出，但不计入总词数；

3. 可以适当增加节，以使行文连贯。

Last weekend my family and I went to Dajiaowan Gulf for a holiday.______________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________

步骤1：认真审题，提炼要点。

一定体裁：记叙文，记叙一次旅游活动

二定时态：旅游发生在过去，因此描述旅游前的准备和过程都应该采用一般过去

时；而感想则可以用一般现在时或现在完成时。

三定要点：结合写作内容，整理和罗列要点。

表达旅游活动的常用词汇：

步骤2：整合信息，连词成句。

1. 星期六早上7点开车出发。

_____________________________________________________________________

2. 准备好零食、衣服、相机等。

__________________________________________________________________

3. 在海滩游泳，欣赏海水日出和日落等美景。

__________________________________________________________________

4. 吃海鲜，买纪念品；

___________________________________________________________________

5. 谈感受。

___________________________________________________________________

步骤3：连句成段，用上适当的关联词。

not only…but also…, where, what’s more /besides / in addition, then, because…..

【我的作文】

Last weekend my family and I went to Dajiaowan Gulf for a holiday.______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Directions:

Suppose you are a librarian in your university.Write a notice of about 100 words,providing the newly-enrolled international students with relevant information about the library.

You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.

Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter.Use “Li Ming”instead.

Do not write the address.(10 points)

参考范文：

Notice

Welcome you to this university and this new-bulided library. I am a libraian in our university and will give you relevent information about the library.

To begin with, there is circulation desk in the circulation hall so that you can borrow and return books more quickly and conveniently. Besides, the hours of loan books is during 9:00-17:00 from Monday to Friday so that you can take best advantage of the library. Moreover, the computer room in the library is big enough for you to search for some academic information charged by the hour so you must ensure that some money is left in your ID card.

I hope you will find the above information useful and I would be ready to discuss the matter with you to further details. If you have any questions about the library, please call 123456or send messages to 123456@abc. Wish you a good time during your colledge life.

请注意

欢迎你来这所大学和这个new-bulided库。我是一个libraian在我们的大学会给你有关信息图书馆。

首先,在循环大厅有循环桌子,这样您就可以借并返回书更快更方便。此外,小时的贷款是在9:00-17:00从星期一到星期五,这样您就可以最好的利用图书馆。此外,在图书馆计算机房对你来说是足够大的去寻找一些学术信息按小时收取所以你必须确保一些钱留在你的身份证。

我希望你会发现上面的信息是有用的,我准备和你讨论此事进一步的细节。如果你有任何问题关于图书馆,请致电123456或123456 @abc发送消息。祝你一段美好的时光在你科莱奇的生活。

现在小学毕业如果想顺利进入一家好的中学可不是一件容易的事。下面是小编为大家带来的小升初作文写作六个注意，欢迎阅读。

小升初作文辅导，如何写好小升初语文考试中的应试作文，关系到整个小升初的结果，请注意以下几点。

1、如果根据题目的要求选定了某件事，你就要对这件事进行认真的回忆，并仔细琢磨，反复思考，挖掘出这件事中含有的生活道理，或找出它闪光的地方。

2、要交代清楚时间、地点、人物、事件，让读者明白文章写的是什么人，在什么时候，什么地方发生了怎样的事。

3、必须把事情发生的环境写清楚。因为任何事情总是在一定的环境中发生、发展的。环境写好了，写出特点来，还能渲染气氛，表达感情，使文章更生动。

4、一般要按事情发展顺序，把一件事的起因、经过、结果写清楚，不能颠三倒四，还应把事情的前因后果，来龙去脉写清楚。

5、记事中要围绕中心，抓住重点，不要面面俱到。重点部分(一般指事情发展高潮处)要详写，写具体，写详尽，给读者以深刻的印象。

6、写事离不开写人，在记事过程中，一定要把人物的语言、神态、动作、心理活动等写细致，写逼真，这样才能表达出人物的思想品质，才能更好地表达这件事所包含的意义，即文章的中心思想。

“铁打的校园流水的学生”，又到一年一度的招聘高峰期，新一届的毕业生们开始踏上漫漫求职路。下面是小编收集的毕业生简历的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

首先，是个人基本信息：

1、姓名：必须写。这好象没什么疑问，你得让HR们知道你是谁，否则真让你面试，都不知道该怎么称呼。这一点大家做的比较好，从没遇到过忘写名字的。当然，对于一个忘写名字的人，HR们是绝对不敢录用的，原因很简单，连自己的名字都能忘写，还有什么不敢忘的?

2、性别：最好写。在简历中不写性别的，女生居多，可能是怕被人知道了性别被歧视，但大部分HR是能够从姓名中判断出性别的，即使你的名字很中性，在面试中也还是会暴露，如果用人单位会有性别歧视，最终获得工作的机会也比较小，因此，建议还是标明性别比较好。

3、年龄：无所谓，想写就写，不想写也没关系。一般来说，刚毕业的大学生年龄也不会大到哪去，再说HR们又不是查户口的，但有些研究生毕业时年龄可能偏大，常常因为在35岁上而被年龄歧视，建议这些毕业生不要写年龄，否则会因为年龄问题把其他优点否定了，连个面试的机会都没有。

4、学历、学位、专业：一定要标明，这是HR们最关注的重点词之一。

5、政治面貌：视情况而定，如果不是党员，一般就不要写了;如果是党员，在投递大国企、事业单位时，一定要注明，这些单位对是否是党员还是很看重的，因此在同等条件下，党员有绝对有优势，而投递外企或私企时，影响不大。

6、身高体重：视情况而定，一般没必要写，除非你的身高体重能为你加分。找工作不是选美，大部分的工作对任职人员是没有身高体重的要求的，而且，对于一些身高体重不是非常标准的人来说，过早暴露一些无关紧要的信息，很可能让你失去展示自己其他优点的机会，道理很简

单，求职者无法明确知道HR们的选择标准，因此简历中要尽量展示优点，排除干扰。当然，如果岗位的任职要求中明确表明身高体重要求的，或者你寻找的是类似模特、空姐类型的工作，就一定要写明身高体重。

7、联系方式：一定要有。没有联系方式，HR们就无法联系到你，怎么可能收到面试通知呢?如今手机已经基本普及了，因此，简历的联系方式以留个人手机号码为宜，并注意保持手机通话畅通，以免错失HR们的来电通知。关于联系方式的位置，很多人喜欢放在前面，而HR建议可以放在后面，因为没有哪个招聘人员一上来就对你的联系方式感兴趣，还是把重要的信息放在前面好。

除此之外，还有一些毕业生的简历上会写明身体状况，往往就两个字：良好，也不是很必要，目前大部分企业在与员工签订正式合同之前，都会组织员工进行一些常规性的体检，这部分内容也不需要在简历中体现。

其次，是求职意向：

求职意向这一栏是很难写，原因有两个，一是应届毕业生没参加过工作，对工作没有有很深入的了解，很多毕业生在写简历的时候对自己到底能做什么、想做什么，没有明确的概念。二是应届毕业生的简历没有针对性，很多人的简历就是一站通，求职意向上写着无数个职位，而且有的职位跨度很大，没有丝毫的联系。这其实是一种让人摸不着头脑的做法，看起来好象是个全才，什么都能做，可是又没有明确的目的性，HR们不知道你到底能做些什么。求职者的这种心态可以理解，写少了怕局限了自己的选择，解决这个问题，其实有两种方法，一是明确自己的目的，可以看看师兄师姐们都做什么工作，有个大概了解，然后根据自己的兴趣进行选择，另一种做法则是多准备几份不同的简历，每份简历只写一个求职意向，简历的其他内容全部围绕着这一主题写，这样的简历看起来会更有针对性，也更容易受HR的青睐。

还有很重要的，毕业生要记住，有理想有抱负是好事，但一个公司录用毕业生，往往都是从最基层做起的，因此，求职意向不要写的太大，尽量挑选一些基层岗位，一开始就在求职意向上写上类似战略管理、某某经理这样的岗位，会让HR认为你好高骛远，像这样的大事，还是交给那些领导或是有经验的人去做吧。

此外，HR们透露，很多大企业在招聘应届毕业生时，是很少看求职者求职意向的，在企业看来，毕业生的可塑性极强，一个毕业生被录用后，企业会对其进行入职培养，并在实际工作中把毕业生改造成企业需要的人才，因此，对于毕业生的求职意向，一般不太关注。

第三，是教育背景/学习经历：

这一点没什么说的，只提两点：一是有些毕业生会把自己中学的学习情况写上，这个不需要，从大学写起就行，除非你的简历实在没内容;二是一些毕业生在校可能参加过一些相关技能的培训，这些培训经历也应该写到简历中。

第四，是工作经验/社会实践：

一般来说，应届毕业生没什么工作经历，所以在招聘过程中，HR们并不是很强调这一点。至于社会实践，可以把在校期间的实习或其他经历写上，如在学生会任某部长，做过哪些事，出过哪些力，取得过哪些成绩，写的过程中主要一定要写的详细，而不要只说大概，比如我任系学生会生活部长，组织过系辩论赛，这样写就不太详细，而是应该把在辩论赛中做了哪些工作、发挥了什么作用简单说一下。

切记一点，这部分简历不能随便乱编，你以为你编的天衣无缝，但是面试者往往几句话就能让你原形毕露。

最常见的情况，就是一些毕业生会写上自己担任学生会干部，很少看到没当过的，这会让HR怀疑真实性。不过也有特例的，有HR曾经碰到过一份简历，附着一张学生会干部任职证明，并不是说这份证明的含金量有多高，至少学生会的那个印章比空口一说可信多了。

另外，工作经历或社会实践要挑重点的写，而不是胡子眉毛一起抓，是个事儿就写上，个人觉得重要的要写在前面，主次分明。

第五，是课程：

毕业生往往只是在罗列自己学过的课程，没什么条理性，HR们看起来也比较乱比较烦。建议毕业生最好把自己的课程进行分类，比如管理系的学生，在写自己的课程时可以分为管理类、营销类、财会类、金融类、经济类等等，这样HR在看你的课程时就一目了然了，更有针对性。

此外，毕业生列课程时，要挑出与应聘职位相关的课程，而不是学过的课都写上。

第六，是计算机、外语水平：

一般来说，企业并不要求毕业生计算机过级，即使过级了，也未必计算机如何了得，更何况计算机等级考试的内容很多在工作中根本用不上。因此，简历中只要列明一些常用的办公软件，包括WORD、EXCEL、PPT熟练使用就行。

外语水平标明是四级或六级，很多毕业生在写英语能力时，常用的字眼是良好的听说读写能力。事实上，这是个很模糊的概念，如果可能，应该说的具体些，比如能和外国人自由交流或在某比赛中获得什么奖项，这样会更具竞争力，也能让HR们更好的了解你到底良好到什么程度。

第七，是奖励/证书/科研成果：

凡是获得奖励的都要写上，如奖学金、优秀干部等。

有些证书会增加获得面试的机会，这也是许多在校生热衷于考证的原因。有些证书可能并非考一次就能拿到，比如注会，有些同学认为没拿到证书不能写在简历里，其实这是错误的，可以把已经通过的科目写进简历，别无意间把自己的优势抹杀了。

科研成果，列出毕业论文或发表过的文章就行了，企业一般也不会期望毕业生能有什么科研成果的。

第八，是特长/爱好：

很多毕业生在这里会罗列很多词语，比如，性格开朗、待人热情、工作细心、办事高效、能吃苦耐劳、有较强的组织能力等等，用来突出自己很优秀，但事实上，这些特长词语，HR们基本不看。要想吸引HR们的眼球，你不如只挑几个词，在这些词的后面举个简单的例子证明，比如，你说自己组织能力强，你可以说自己独立组织了某某活动，在系里反响很好，受到了学校表扬等等;与工作相关的特长一定要展开写，比如你说自己写作水平好，HR们可能会误以为你是写散文、写诗歌的高手，对工作帮助不大，但如果写明自己非常擅长写应用文、各种报告等，就简单明了;此外，与职位无关的特长、爱好最好不要写，比如各种球类运动、唱歌等等，这些特长、爱好都是需要你以后在工作中有机会展示的，而不是在简历中，写多了，会让简历没有重点。

写完以上八个部分，基本就是一份完整的简历，如果其中的文字内容能做到流畅通顺，简明扼要，条理清楚，重点突出，就能算是一份优秀的简历了，以下部分，可以按照实际情况考虑是否需要增加：

首先是英文求职信、英文简历，应该附。虽然不是所有单位都对英语有比较高的要求，但艺多不压身，一份出色的英文简历会比“良好的英文听说读写能力”更具说服力，更好的展示了英文能力，不过需要注意的是，有很多毕业生的英文简历写得也不是太高明，只是把中文简历简单的翻译一遍，很多甚至就是用翻译软件随便翻译的，很生硬，这样的英文简历并不能为你加分，甚至也会过早的暴露出你的短板。因此，英文简历最基本的是不能有拼写错误或语法错误，不要简单翻译中文简历，最好找个懂英文的帮忙润色一下。

其次是学校推荐信、成绩单：很多HR认为，推荐信不过就是盖了学校公章的白纸，里面的内容基本是学生自己写的，可信度并不大，附不附并不重要，当然，如果你的院系导师愿意为你写一份真正的推荐信，那是最好了。而成绩单则可以让HR们从侧面了解学生的学习态度和努力程度，如果求学期间成绩很好，学分绩点较高，排名靠前，就一定要附，在简历的显著位置标明，如果成绩一般，附不附都可以，如果大学期间有过挂科补考的历史，那就一定不要附了。

第三是各种证书复印件：一般也不用附，除非企业明确要求。一般的企业在面试通过后或者报道时，会要求员工出示相关证书原件，比复印件更具说服力。

至于其他的如学校简介、专业简介，就更没必要了。如果你就读的是北大清华之类的院校，一般大家都会知道，其他院校，如果HR不了解，会在面试时询问，如果你把你学校说的很好，但大部分人都没听过，你的说辞就很难有说服力，甚至可能影响到别人对你简历真实程度的判断。

最后，再小结一下，写简历要注意的事项：

第一，简历要简，一到两页就够了，无关紧要的东西不要附，格式要有创新，不要让HR感觉是在填表格。

第二，简历要突出重点，最想传递的信息一定要重点突出，让HR一眼就能看到。

第三，检查检查再检查，简历中不要有明显字词语句错误。

第四，用事实说话，空洞的词语少写。

写作能力是人的语言表达能力的重要组成部分，所以,在汉语教学过程中，对于学生写作能力的培养十分重要。

1．词汇量有限,不能细致地进行表达:例如"我的妈妈是个好妈妈,她不但对我很好，她对每个人也都很好。她真是一个好妈妈。"简单重复的词语明显地限制了语言的表现力。

2．表达能力有限,难以组织一篇结构完整语气连贯的文章。由于学生还不太熟悉汉语的思维习惯和表达习惯，当他从写单句过渡到组织一篇文章,用汉语进行连贯的表达时，就常常会显得力不从心,写出来的文章常常是支离破碎或辞不达意。

3．自己不知道自己的文章里写的是什么。这是一种很特殊的现象，多发生在华裔孩子身上。看起来文从字顺的一篇作文,但它的作者却不会读它。为什么?因为作文是在家长帮助下写出来的，遣词造句反映的是家长的思维。这样的作文练习根本起不到练习的作用。

4．畏惧写作文。有些学生在读书和默写甚至造句方面都表现不错,但由于害怕写作文，几乎放弃坚持了几年的中文学习。

一、日记书信体结构

一位学生在作文《校园生活剪影》中用酸、甜、苦、辣、咸为五个小标题，以日记体的形式记录了校园生活的丰富多彩。再比如，一位考生的作文《写给小蜜蜂的一封信》，就是一篇书信体的作文，作者用蜘蛛大哥给小蜜蜂回信的形式，展开想象，列举了梅花傲雪怒放，蝴蝶破茧而出的事例，有力地说明了幸福是通过辛勤劳动得来的观点。

二、题记式结构

在正文前引用名言或自撰几句富有意蕴的话，或展示主题内容，或阐述写作缘由，谓之题目记。

一位考生的作文《特殊拍卖会》中有这样一段题记：“如今，科技在不断发展，人们生活水平在不断提高，可是我们的生态环境却在不停地遭到破坏，照这样下去，一百年，一千年，一万年以后，地球会变成什么样呢?”正文则写了地球遭到严重污染，一瓶水拍卖到2亿元，一瓶空气拍卖到80亿元的故事，题记揭示了文章的主要内容，体现出与众不同的构思，结尾还有一段后记：“再见了，自食恶果的人类，再见了，可怜的地球!人类，好自为之吧!但愿地球不会在宇宙中消失，也愿你们能让地球恢复原有的青春。”这段后记点明文章的主旨，与题记遥相呼应，浑然一体。

三、戏剧影视式结构

有些作文以剧本分镜头的形式，设置一两个人物，两三处场景，有的还配以画外音，用集中的矛盾冲突个表现主题，如话题作文“善良”，有位考生采用话剧形式写的作文《善良归家》，作者以其丰富的想像力，编述了善良被抛弃又回到人间的故事，巧妙地设计了四个具体的场景，在这四个场景中情节和语言都富于变化。如刚开始面对金钱时，善良是“满怀希望地招着手”;两次被拒绝后，面对权力时，善良是“挥动着沉重地双手”。剧本写了金钱、地位、权力抛弃善良的结局、时光老人的言行，再加上画外音的巧妙运用深刻地表达出人们需要善良，善良是人世间最宝贵的这一主题。这比那些空喊口号的文章要深刻得多，立意也高远得多。特别是结束时，时光老人的话语和画外音的设计，可谓是画龙点睛，余味无穷。

四、说明广告文体结构

巧妙地化用应用文体，是结构创新的又一技巧。

“做人”这个话题，一般考生都写成记叙文或议论文，而一位考生却采用说明文的形式写成《“人生灵”使用说明书》，可谓独出心裁!文章从产品品格、配料、特点，保质期、使用方法到主要功能，还有注意事项等，全面阐释了作者对做人这一话题的观点。

还有的采用医生诊断书的形式如《患者吴诚信的就诊报告》，有的采用广告书形式，如《纯天然诚信口服液》，作者从广告的创作中受到启发，对于子虚乌有的“纯天然诚信口服液”，运用广告创意渲染包装，将其捧上天，而结尾则道明3个月后，厂家倒闭，，两者对比，意味深长。

五、引用古今文体结构

高考话题作文“心灵的选择”，有位考生独辟蹊径，套用古典诗词《孔雀东南飞》，写了一篇题为《孔雀西北飞》的古诗作文，全诗套用《孔雀东南飞》的句式，五字一句，表达了作者大学毕业后选择去西北支教的心理历程，这种旧瓶装新酒的形式令人耳目一新，该文成了当年高考满分作文。

再比如《孔二哥考大学》则套用鲁迅的小说《孔乙己》而作，虽是一篇游戏之作，作文只将几个词替换，整篇小说的风格却大相径庭，文章揭露了当今社会高考的弊端，让读者在笑过之余，悟出其中的道理。

总之，文章的结构多种多样，要不拘一格，根据实际情况灵活运用，使你的文章光彩夺目，出奇制胜。

导语：2016年高三开学已经一个星期了，高三的同学们是不是又投入了紧张的高考一轮复习中，下面小编整理了一些高考满分作文写作技巧，供大家鉴赏!

1、随时随地记下你的灵感 随身带一本小笔记本(纳博科夫身上装满了小卡片)，当你对你的构思小说，文章，或是小说里的人物有什么灵感的时候，马上记下来。当你听到别人谈话的只言片语所有顿悟时，看到一段散文诗或是一句歌词让你很感动时，都可以马上当他们记下来。灵感总是转瞬即逝的，你及时的记录下来，可以成为你写作的素材。我的习惯是，为我的博客要写的文章列一个清单，不断的补充它。

2、专门的写作时间 每天找一段没有任何打扰的时间作为专门的写作时间，让这成为习惯。对我而言，清晨的时间是最佳的，午饭，傍晚，或者深夜的那段时间也可以。无论你是做什么工作的，把写作当作每天必须完成的任务去做。每天至少写半个小时，当然有一个小时更好。如果你跟我一样，是一个全职的作家，你需要写更多的小时，请你不要担心，这只会让你写得更好。

3、读优秀作家的作品 这是显而易见的，但却是立竿见影的方法。如果你不读更多的好作品，你就不知道如何写出更好的作品。优秀的作家都是从阅读别人的佳作开始，接着开始模仿，最后超越他们，形成自己的风格。尽可能的多读著作吧，再看内容的时候，更要留意文章的问题和写作的技巧。

4.好开头和结尾 开头和结尾是文章的重点。特别是开头。如果你不能在故事的开始吸引读者，他们很难有耐心把整篇文章读完。所以投入更多的时间考虑怎么写好开头，读者一旦对你开头感兴趣，他们会想知道得更多...写好开头后，再弄一个精彩的结尾，这会让读者更加期待你的下一篇佳作。

5、采用对话式的文体 很多人写的很正式，但是我发现最好是写得像我们说话一样会更流畅，更通俗。这样一来，读者看起来会更舒服。刚开始这么写并不容易，你需要坚持这么做。也许，会带来另一个问题，为了读起来更口语化，你需要打破一些语法规则(就像我的前一句那样)。因为如果生搬硬套语法，会让你的文章看起来很不自然。但是如果没有其他原因，不要破坏语法规则。你需要知道你在做什么，为什么这样做.

6、集中精神 写作是一件一心一意的事情，在嘈杂的环境或是同时干别的事情，是不可能写的好。写作需要一个安静的环境，需要一点点柔和的背景音乐。那怕是最低要求，你需要在全屏(没有其他软件得干扰)的条件下，使用WriteRoom， DarkRoom，Writer这些写作软件，不受打扰的写作。关掉邮箱，关点MSN和Gtalk，关掉电话和手机，关掉电视，清理掉书桌上无用的东西。清除与写作无关的一切杂念，现在就是写作的时间，好像把自己放进一个盒子一样，没有任何打扰地进入写作状态。

以下是英文写作翻译频道为大家整理的《简单英语作文翻译：关于运动会的谈话》，供大家参考。

Hi,Jack,we’re going to have our school sports meeting on the playground next week.It will last three days from Thursday to Saturday.We have many competitions in running,such as 100-metre race,200-metre race,400-metre race and the .Please be on time,wear your sports shoes and take a bottle of water. Good luck to you!

嗨，杰克，我们要有我们学校的运动会在操场上下周。它将从星期四持续到星期六三天。我们在跑步比赛，如100米跑，200米跑，400米跑和接力赛。我们也有跳远，跳高等等。我知道你很擅长跑步。请参加男子400米的比赛， 星期五上午10:30，请准时，穿上你的运动鞋，带上一瓶水。祝你好运！

不论诗歌，还是散文，传统认识集中体现在一般写作教材上，对其定义的认识既不准确统一，又片面地强调社会属性。不合乎文体本质属性的传统文学体裁定义在本书中一概不提。需要的是最终表现作者个体生命本真的文体定义。散文是一种作者写自己经历见闻中的真情实感的灵活精干的文学体裁。

作者在散文中的形象比较明显，常用第一人称叙述，个性鲜明，正象巴金所说“我的任何散文里都有我自己”，总之可以说是表现自我。这就需要大胆无忌。正如鲁迅所说“任意而谈，无所顾忌”，他还推崇曹操及魏晋散文的“力主通脱”。又如刘半农所说，散文要“赤裸裸地表达”。还如一些人所说，“我是怎样一个人，就怎样写”，“心口相应，信口直说”，“反正我只是这样一个我”。写真实的“我”是散文的核心特征和生命所在。这是定义的最大要素。

散文语言十分重要。首要的一条是以口语为基础，而文语(包括古语和欧化语)为点缀。其次是要清新自然，优美洗练。此外，还可以讲究一些语言技法，如句式长短相间，随物赋形，如多用修辞特别是比喻，如讲音调、节奏、旋律的音乐美等。

必须明确一个散文写作观念，这就是散文的唯一内容和对象是作者的感情体验。所有教材都提出了散文要写感情，但却是作为一种必备因素和一种内在线索。应当强调指出，感情不是片面的因素，也不仅仅是线索，而是散文的对象。散文写人写事都只是表面现象，从根本上说写的是感情体验。感情体验就是“不散的神”，而人与事则是“散”的可有可无、可多可少的“形”。朱自清的《背影》不是要记录回家和父子离别的琐事，而是要吐露一种对父亲及失败了的父辈的怜惜和敬爱。刘真的《望截流》，重点不是顺理成章的工程本身或建设者业绩，而是一种回归历史进步主流的内心感受。散文一开始就使自己沉浸在一种突如其来的悲喜交集的感情体验中，由此生发联想——小时候跟着妈妈赶集差一点丢失，四十年代初一度离开部队，“文革”中被迫放下笔等。最后又面对横江截流的宏伟场面，激情满怀。感情体验，是散文的内在结构。有了它，就可以天马行空地起草。这一点，不能不明朗和确定。有了散文的内在结构——感情体验，只要再明确外在结构的核心就可以写好散文。外在结构的核心是细节。

散文和小说一样，建立在细节的描写和叙述的基础上，但细节的排列组合方式不同。可以说，小说组合细节是“以盘盛珠”，而散文则是“以线穿珠”。小说的“盘”是一个社会的横切面，具备冲突，各种阶层、力量的人物或隐或显。而细节只能在这样的“盘”中有机地展开。散文的“线”，就是感情体验，或多或少，随手拈来，任情挥洒——以感情体验的表现为准。由此，我们说散文(应称艺术散文)，是最自由的文体，散漫如水，手法灵活。只要弄清以上四点，写真实自我及由此生发的个性口语、感情体验和细节描写，就掌握了散文写作的要领，什么意、章法(如文眼)、意境等等一般化认识都不必过于拘谨地学习，其它文体理论知识和写作基础理论都会讲到。

散文可以主要分为记叙散文和抒情散文(仍按传统的不明确的说法)两种。下面将两种散文的模式列出，供初学者和高等教育应试者选择使用。

一、记人散文模式

【开头】①感情化语言概括叙述。我和该人，重点在后。介绍该人，如肖像描写。②两者关系及该人精神特质的议论。

【中间】▲一种情况：一件事。从开头、发展到结尾，细致叙述和描写。

▲另一种情况：几件事。每件事即每层次前，可以用对该人精神特质的一个因素领起。以对该人的感情体验及整体议

二、论来贯穿几件事。

【结尾】①重申特质，照应开头。②深化感情关系，发出感慨。

三、抒情散文模式

【开头】1叙述自己与景物的关系。2议论景物和自己。

【中间】1描写景物，分出层次，细致动人。2联想发挥，更大意义。

【结尾】感慨

四、散文写作——构思、联想、语言

散文，往往通过生活中偶发的、片断的事象，去反映其复杂的背景和深广的内涵，做到“一粒沙里见世界，半瓣花上说人情”。要达到这种境界，构思是关键。

构思，是作者对一篇作品的整个认识过程，从他对外界事物的最初感受到成篇的全过程。就是进入下笔阶段，也仍然在思考，在探索，在继续认识所要描写的对象，深入发掘其底蕴和内涵。这是一种复杂的、艰辛的、严肃的精神活动，是对作家人格、修养、功力的考验。由于事物间的联系是深邃而微妙的，作家要善于由表及里，从纷繁错综的联系里，发现其独特而奥妙的联系点，才能够从“引心”到“会心”，由“迎意”到“立意”。

构思的奥妙，不同的作家有不同发现。于是就出现了种种不同的构思方法。秦牧的构思方法，有人叫做“滚雪球”。他写散文，起初的感受只是一点点，如一片小雪花，随着题材的增加，体会的深入，联想的开展，那感觉一步步膨胀起来，就象滚雪球一样。这里可贵的是最初的感觉，照秦牧的话说，它是事物的“尖端”部分，最富有“特征”的部分，一旦被作家抓住，就象一粒饱满的种子，落到肥沃的土壤里，作家用思想、感情的阳光雨露恩泽它，使它萌发成丰富的果实。这是一个核心，越滚越大，形成统一的构思。他的名篇《土地》、《社稷坛抒情》就是很好的例子。

徐迟的构思方法，叫“抓一刹那”。这“一刹那”他认为是事物的“精华”部分，最有“光彩”部分。抓住这“一刹那”，就抓住了头绪，抓住了中心，零散杂乱的材料才得以集中，才有了归宿。如他的《在湍流的涡漩中》的创作，正反两方面的教训都可以说明这个问题。

杞麓湖的述说

尹汉胤

通海，一片令人留连遐思的土地，静静地深居在云贵高原腹地。高耸绵延的大山，舒缓地环抱着它。在厚重的大山怀抱中，它就像一个熟睡的婴儿，宁静而安详。远远望去，它又像是深宅大院中精美小巧的后花园，隔绝了外界尘世的纷扰，沉淀着岁月，品味着生活，幽雅地经营着自己秀美的河山。千百年来，通海人在这块土地上自给自足地繁衍生息，保持着自己独特的生活节奏，悠然地度过一个个寒暑晨昏。

眼前那一片诱人的湖水——杞麓湖，阳光下波澜不兴，沉静如一面铜镜。望着它平静不语的水面，会使人感觉在那水中不知蕴藏着多少秘密。其实通海的历史变迁，特别是700年前，发生在此的那一幕动人心魄的烽烟历史，都深藏在那湖中。

公元1252年，后来成为元宪宗的蒙哥为灭亡南宋统一中国，命其弟忽必烈统率10万大军平定云南。蒙古铁骑从宁夏六盘山绝尘而来，以锐不可挡之势，迅速灭亡了与中原割据了500多年的大理国。尘埃落定，蒙古骑兵屯军在杞麓湖畔。水草丰美的杞麓湖，成为了他们的高原牧场。从此，北方游牧民族剽悍勇武的血液，溶入了这高原湖泊。

历史兴衰，朝代更替。当年的马背民族，早已放弃了骑射，弃甲归田。地理环境的改变，使当年蒙古军户的后代生活发生了根本的变化。他们学会了造船，在杞麓湖中捕鱼，开垦农田插秧种稻，在这片土地上开始了新的生活。美丽迷人的杞麓湖畔，在彝族、傣族、哈尼族那动人的情歌中，又融入了悠远的蒙古长调，那歌声寄托着蒙古族对遥远故乡的思念，那歌声述说着蒙古族在陌生土地上生息繁衍的历史。那歌声盘旋萦绕在杞麓湖畔，那歌声将这片高原湖泊与遥远的蒙古草原连结在了一起。

走进通海蒙古族聚居的兴蒙乡，见街上的房屋建筑形制严格而美观。房屋墙上，多饰有花砖砌成的风火墙，屋脊上雕塑有精致的龙头。一问才知，通海的蒙古族早在明朝，便有人出外学习建筑。清朝时，蒙乡的泥瓦匠已遍布滇中南地区。通海的聚奎楼、清真寺，个旧的宝华山营庙，开远的弥勒寺，蒙自的四角楼，昆明西山的西园、南屏街兴文银行、翠湖卢汉公馆，都有通海蒙古族工匠参与建造。乡间更流传着蒙乡建筑祖师旃班的故事。传说蒙乡人的建筑技艺是鲁班传授给旃班，再由旃班传授给了蒙乡人。每年的农历四月初二，是鲁班向旃班赠送《艺经》的日子，旃班也在此日收徒。为此，蒙乡人将四月初二这一天定为“鲁班节”。每到鲁班节，外出做工的工匠，都要回乡聚集在鲁班祠，各路工匠聚在一起喝茶、饮酒、交流技艺。通海兴蒙乡的建筑业不仅在云南享有盛名，而且已成为兴蒙乡的一大产业。

穿行在一座座房屋院落间，见乡里的蒙古族青年，脸型线条硬朗，有着明显的北方民族特征。想不到在异乡水土生存了700多年，其民族基因依然那么清晰地保留在脸上。可看着他们现代化的住房，时尚的服装，我又有些疑问，不知在他们心里是否还保留着自己的民族文化传统。走近乡政府，一座昂首奋蹄的骏马雕塑，醒目地矗立在门前广场上，使人精神为之一振。“蒙古人历滇750周年纪念”几个大字使我意识到，岁月地域虽隔绝了他们的故土，放弃了传统生活，但那飞鬣扬鬃的骏马，依然是他们传承凝聚民族精神的象征。

在供奉有蒙古先祖成吉思汗、蒙哥、忽必烈的“三圣宫”，3位蒙古先祖的塑像，目光威严地凝视着前方。如他们有知，一定会为自己这一支流落他乡的子孙感到骄傲。如今兴蒙乡居住有5000多人，其中97%是蒙古族。漫漫7个世纪，这一支蒙古族，在远离故乡的云南杞麓湖畔，与当地各民族和睦相处，和谐地融入了这片红色土地，并用自己的勤奋智慧，创造着自己新的生活，赢得了云南各民族的尊敬。

见证了兴蒙乡700年历史的杞麓湖，700年中与兴蒙乡同悲共喜、相守相依的杞麓湖，在默默期待，期待着兴蒙乡在新的世纪里创造出更加辉煌的未来。

《人民日报》 ( 2006-07-04 第15版 )

追寻青藏铁路精神(人民论坛)

唐 宋

青藏铁路全线通车之际，上千名中外记者踏上吉祥的天路，去掀开神山圣水的神秘面纱。一位在美国定居的华侨特意飞回祖国买票，她要带自己的两个孩子坐首趟列车翻越昆仑山，去感受文成公主当年进藏的旅程。

“赫赫我祖，来自昆仑。” 在中华民族文化史上，昆仑山被尊为“万山之宗，龙脉之祖”。河源昆仑，是炎黄子孙不可磨灭的情结和象征。在绵延5000多年的浩瀚历史中，很多朝代都曾探源三江源，这种历尽艰险的探索，是对地理方位的考察，对神话传说的验证，更是对民族之根的探求，对理想精神的追寻。

今天，在古人可望而不可即的“世界第三极”，青藏铁路矫若游龙，飞舞于世界屋脊。建设青藏铁路过程中锤炼的挑战极限、勇创一流精神，镌刻在地球之巅，激荡于江河之源。

世界上海拔最高的铁路、世界上穿越冻土区里程最长的高原铁路、世界海拔最高的冻土隧道、世界最长的高原铁路桥……青藏铁路建设者以科技创新挑战世界极限，攻克了“高寒缺氧、多年冻土、生态脆弱”三大世界性难题，青藏铁路被国际社会誉为“可与长城媲美的伟大工程”。很多人感喟，如果没有雄厚的国力，没有勇攀科技高峰的精神，就不可能创造出在平均海拔4000米以上修建高原铁路的人间奇迹。

“艰苦不怕苦，缺氧不缺精神，风暴强意志更强，海拔高追求更高。”从青藏铁路建设者的口号中，人们看到了艰苦奋斗、自强不息、坚韧不拔地创造历史伟业的精神。面对生命禁区高寒、缺氧的恶劣环境，面对技术更复杂，条件更恶劣，保障更困难，任务更艰巨的严峻考验，十万筑路大军没有退缩，没有气馁，用长达五年的艰苦奋战，改写了世界铁路建设史。“白天劳累扯块白云擦把汗，爽;夜晚孤寂摘颗星星点盏灯，酷。”铿锵有力的宣言，以苦为乐的精神，感动了中国，震撼了世界。

上了青藏线，就是做奉献。在十万筑路大军中，有眼睛肿得睁不开依然坚守岗位的隧道工程指挥者，有在昆仑山地震时冲进隧道与塌方作抗争的班长，有放弃国外高薪的工作机会选择青藏线的大学生，有参加过青藏铁路一期建设的“老铁道兵”的儿子，有接到孩子的电话就忍不住流泪的母亲……这些无私奉献的青藏铁路建设者，怎不让人由衷赞叹，感佩不已?!

“登昆仑兮四望，心飞扬兮浩荡。”两千年前的屈原，留下了脚踏祥云游览昆仑的梦想。“而今我谓昆仑：不要这高，不要这多雪。” 1935 年，长征中的中央红军翻越岷山，面对如海的雪峰，毛主席写下了《念奴娇·昆仑》，抒发了改造中国与世界的理想和抱负。而今，奔驰在雪域高原的列车昭示世人：勤劳智慧的中国人民有志气、有信心、有能力不断创造非凡的业绩，有志气、有信心、有能力屹立于世界先进民族之林。

走一趟青藏线吧，去感受古老而现代的昆仑文化，去丈量中华民族的精神海拔，去追寻荡气回肠的青藏铁路精神。

文章摘要：经过我的一个个发明人类的社会将会更加美好?要是煮熟了放在碗里，像泄了气的皮球一样软软的。中考作文写作技巧及方法天兵天将不是很威风吗。谁叫他敬酒不吃吃罚酒呀；By——熙瑞。”“大姨允许你玩一会儿。月眼睁睁的看着雨倒下了，就倒在自己身前；你不会让老师失望的，对吧。

1.严谨的布局：

正所谓万事开头难，不过只要开了个好头，这篇作文就会很好写了。

凤头：是文章的首段，是阅卷老师首先入眼的地方，一定要做好整篇文章的中心把握，要做到下文与首段上下连贯，紧密结合，要通过开头使下文有可写之处，开头要达到让阅卷老师耳目一新的效果。例如，巧用排比，比喻，拟人等修辞手法，并且通过这些修辞手法，而统领全文主旨。

猪肚：在一篇上好的文章中，分段都会恰到好处，而当文章中只有一大段或两三段时，这篇文章即使文采再出众，也不会有太高的分数，因为阅卷老师在中考判卷时，每三分钟就要判出一份作文，工作量相当大，如果不善于分段，阅卷老师可能失去耐心，从而看不完，就会草草的给出分数。所以，在我看来，一篇文章至少要分6-8个段，但不是一行或几行一段，而是要看起来像豆腐块，一块块整齐的排列在一起，使文章紧中有松，松弛有度。要看上去整篇文章是一个整体，而不是零散的。

豹尾：在文章的最后处，应当让主题更突出鲜明，升华主题思想，使豹尾抽起来!或让人感到峰回路转，柳暗花明或更进一步的特殊效果。在文章末尾，应当再次点题，紧扣中心思想，让贯穿始终的中心思想继续延伸，引人深思。特别是要在结尾处，与开头形成呼应，对比，递进等等，来引发阅读老师的共鸣!

2.细腻的文笔：不管是记叙，议论还是散文;不管是写人写事还是写景。都要用细腻的文笔呈现出来，使文章中点更突出，让阅卷老师在看试卷的过程中，有深思，放慢阅读速度和重复阅读的情况出现，让阅卷老师身临其境，从而使文章更具灵性。

3.贯穿始终的思想感情：在一篇布局格式上很得当，错落有致的文章上，还必须要有一条贯穿始终的思想路线，这条线就像鱼的脊椎一样重要，这条线一定要清晰，明确，千万不可含混不清。

把握好这几点，一篇好的中考作文已经大致成型，不过要想在中考中脱颖而出，这仅仅是开始。

新闻，是指通过报纸、电台、广播、电视台、互联网等媒体途径所传播信息的一种称谓。小编收集了新闻稿件的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

一、培养新闻触角和新闻敏感，善于发现新闻线索，是写好第一篇新闻稿的意思准备

同是大学生记者，共同生活在同一个环境里，也都到实践中去了，到学生中去了，为什么有的记者能写出漂亮的新闻作品，而有的记者仍然发现不了新闻线索，或者说发现不了有意义的新闻线索呢?为什么有的学生记者通讯员总是埋怨没有什么东西可写，而一再要求编辑老师为他们提供采访的话题，说到底这就是一个新闻敏感的问题。

什么叫新闻敏感或新闻触角呢?简言之，它就是新闻工作者识别新闻的敏锐能力。一个具有新闻价值的事情，别人不能看出它是新闻，而你却一下就能识别它是新闻，这就是新闻敏感。没有一定的新闻触角和新闻敏感，就很难写出一篇像样的新闻稿。美国新闻学家卡斯柏.约斯特在《新闻学原理》一书中的一段话，形象的阐述了新闻敏感对于记者的重要性。他说：“一个不善于辨别色彩的人，不能成为一个画家;一个不懂得和谐的人，不能成为一个音乐家;一个没有‘新闻敏感’的人，也不能成为一个新闻记者。”(1)培养新闻触角和新闻敏感，善于发现新闻线索，就能够当事情还在“风起于清萍之末”时，就敏感地察觉到它，并预见它的去向，从而比较得心应手地写出一篇新闻稿。

当然，新闻敏感不是与生俱来的，而是记者在采访实践中不断培养训练获得的。在大学生记者群中，不乏这样的人，他们刚开始成为一名学生记者，通讯员的时候，由于都是刚刚从中学来到大学，不用说缺乏新闻触角和新闻敏感，就是基本的新闻知识也不具备。但是，他们经过一段时间的新闻工作实践，刻苦学习，勤奋笔耕，终于成为了一名有一定新闻敏感和写作能力的校园记者。二、积累新闻素材，选好新闻题材，找准新闻角度，是写好第一篇新闻稿的前提。

人民艺术家老舍曾经对初学写作的年轻人说过：“先收集材料，越多越好。”周立波也认为“材料少了不好办。”有个外国记者说：“你要有作为吗?*8小时写稿不行，要做24小时的记者。”这些都说明积累素材对写作的重要意义。作为一个初学写作的大学生记者，更应该重视积累新闻素材。新闻素材是进入记者视野并被记者所意识，所采摘的生活现象，即从社会生活摄取而来的、尚未通过提炼和加工的原始材料。没有新闻材料的积累过程，就谈不上新闻写作的问题，作为记者，要积累新闻素材，必须重视自己的“笔记本”。法国作家果戈里便有一个近五百页的笔记本，他总爱把自己每时每刻看到的、听到的传闻趣事、警句谚语随时记到这个笔记本上。他说：“一个作家。应该象画家一样，身上经常带着铅笔和纸张。一位画家如果虚度了一天，没有画成一张画稿，那很不好。一个作家如果虚度了一天。没有记下一条思想，一个特点，也很不好。”每一个大学生记者，要写好一篇新闻稿，就必须养成随得随记的习惯，把在校园内看到的一切与师生相关、有可能产生新闻的素材积累起来。一个校报记者在几年的采访过程中积累起来的“笔记本”，将成为他从事新闻写作和研究工作的“万宝囊”。

角度，是新闻写作向自然科学借用来的一个概念。报道的角度，是记者认识被报道对象的思想方法及对被报道对象各“侧面”把握水平的综合反映的结果。它在一定程度上能说明记者处理采访的素材、挖掘材料的新闻价值的流程。大量散漫在笔记本上和记忆中的材料，如何进入新闻的既成轨道中呢?找出它之所以构成为新闻的特殊由头，就为记者进入材料的世界打开了一个突破口，开启了一扇大门;同时，找出最便于读者接受的角度，实质上是对材料的归纳和梳理，并对读者认识、接受事实起到了一个“导读”的作用。

要写好一篇新闻稿，可以注重这样几个角度：

第二、特色角度，有些节日的庆祝活动每年都大同小异，但我们如果找准了该年活动的特色内容进行报道，就能写出有价值的新闻。

分享或讨论以及反映相关话题，请到论坛讨论

第三、读者角度，要注意研究同全校师生的物质生活和精神生活竟紧密相连、普遍关心的问题，选择发生在师生学习、生活中的“小事”，以小见大，才能增强新闻的吸引力。作为一个大学生记者，只要经常深入到同学们的教室、寝室、图书馆、运动场，注意观察他们的学习和生活状况，了解他们的意见和要求，从他们的意见和要求，从他们最关心、最想知道的内容入手，才能写出有意义的新闻。

第四、时间和空间角度。有些新闻事实，在不同的时期、不同的空间其重要的程度也会发生一定的变化。有的事实发生在去年算不了新闻，但发生在今年却要算新闻了;有的事实发生在a学院算不了新闻而发生在b学院却又算新闻了;有的事件和话题，在一定时期内迫切需要解决，对实际工作能起推动作用;有的问题在一定时期内成为师生关注的焦点。

三、掌握新闻写作的一般技巧，提炼新闻主题，是写好第一篇新闻稿的关键

大学生记者要写好一篇新闻稿件，就必须掌握各种新闻体裁写作的一般技巧。如果是学写第一篇新闻稿，至少要做到以下几点：

第一、基本掌握标题的制作技巧。标题是文章的眼睛，一篇新闻稿若有一条新颖别致的标题，就能象磁石那样牢牢地吸引编辑和读者的注意力。

第二、学会写导语。导语是消息的开头，是消息中最有价值的部分。国外新闻界有人称导语是“抓心的手”这就是极言导语吸引作用的。没有好的导语，就算不上成功的新闻稿。

第三、基本熟悉各种新闻体裁的写法和结构。不熟悉各种新闻体裁的基本写法，就无法比较得心应手地进行新闻写作。而谋篇布局的好坏在一定程度上决定新闻稿件在受众和编辑眼中的“身价”

第四、理解和掌握新闻写作的基本方法——用事实说话。摆事实，用事实说话，这是新闻独特魅力所在，也是新闻事业不可代替的价值所在。初学新闻的大学生记者往往用自己的主观评价和臆断代替大量的重要的新闻事实，使写出的新闻或空洞无物，或言不及义

而孕育新闻主题，则是提高新闻稿价值的应有之义。新闻主题是一篇报道的主旨，我们写任何东西，都要有一个明确的目的，到底要表现什么、反映什么，若是心中无数，势必信笔涂鸦，不知所云。如果要反映记者对生活现象和社会问题的基本态度和看法，使写出的新闻报道吸引人、鼓舞人、引导人、就必须注重提炼新闻主题。清代的袁枚对“主题思想”的问题讲的精彩。他把漂亮的句子比做一大堆铜钱，古代的铜钱外圆内方，可以用绳子穿起来，一串铜钱叫“一贯”，袁枚认为，文章的主题就好比是穿钱的绳子，要是没有一个明确的主题思想来统帅你的文字，那你写的东西就像撒满一地的铜钱，不能派上用场。如获得1986年全国高校校报好消息一等奖的《小郎和日本姑娘喜结良

缘》(3)，如果作者只是轻描淡写地描述去婚姻本身，而不是站在“为中日友谊写下了新篇章”、日本姑娘向往中国、追求自我存在价值的高度，就不会使这篇消息给人以启迪和教育，也就成不了一篇好消息。

新闻主题是整篇报道的灵魂，它隐藏于新闻素材之中，一旦我们把它发掘出来，它就会统领全篇，成为整篇报道的中心内容。我们要站在时代和社会的高度，坚持实事求是、不落俗套、贴近生活、读者至上等原则，运用追根究底法、对比联系法、见微知著法等方法，提炼和深化新闻主题。

四、虚心请教，大胆投稿是写好第一篇新闻稿的必要过程

请教的时间，可以贯穿到新闻采访写作的全过程。如何培养新闻敏感，寻找新闻线索可以请教;如何拟订采访提纲、选好新闻题材、提炼和表现新闻主题可以请教;如何使写出来的新闻更加符合新闻写作的要求，更加精彩，更应该虚心向学长、师长请教。

一篇新闻概写好后，还得大胆投稿。有的初学新闻的学生记者，或者认为自己的作品羞于出手，即使写好了，也不敢或不愿寄出去，或者总是过分要求稿子的质量，一而在，再而三的修改，结果错过了报道的时机。其实，由于校园存在范围小、易于捕捉、头绪少等特点，如果不抢时间积极投稿，就会让别人抢得先机，即使你写得再好，也只能算作又一次练笔了。

当然，大胆投稿不是盲目投稿。如果没有任何目的，打的是无准备之仗，再好的稿子也可能石沉大海。因此，作为一个大学生记者，一定要认真研究传播媒介，研究它的版式结构、专栏设置、报道风格、出版或播出周期甚至编辑部的人员构成、编辑姓名及联系电话等。是邮寄的，还要弄清楚通讯地址，保证所投稿件万无一失地寄到编辑部。这样一来，就可以在写稿之前，针对传播媒介的特点，引导自己的创作思路和方法，对写作内容和形式作出必要的限制;在新闻稿写好之后也能够有的放矢地投递到报纸等媒体的相应版面、专栏及编辑手中，从而大大增强新闻稿见报几率或播出几率。

总之，作为初学新闻的大学生记者，如何写好第一篇新闻稿是十分关键的，也不是轻而易举的事情。大学生记者只有勇于实践，大胆尝试，深入采访，勤奋笔耕，不断提高新闻采访写作的技巧，才能写出更多更好的新闻作品。

一、说明文的特点

说明文是一种对事物作客观说明的一种文体，目的在于给予读者知识。中学生对说明文的写作最感头痛，往往举步维艰。其实，说明文的写作并非像同学们所害怕的那样，只要理顺了头绪，把阅读说明文和写作说明文结合起来，以阅读课文为写作借鉴的范例，多观察、多分析、多练习，就能逐步学会选用恰当的说明方法，正确而有条理地说明事物的特征

第一，要写好一篇说明文，首先得分清说明文和记叙文的区别。说明文的写作是授人以知，让人明白，记叙文写作目的是以情感人、让人动情。说明文只是说明事物的特征，阐明原理，介绍知识，说明是手段。说明文与议论文的区别，主要在于说明文的目的主要是说明，议论文的目的则主要是说理；说明文要求把实体事物或抽象事理本身的情况说清楚，议论文则要求提出个人对议论对象的看法或主张

第二，要完成一篇说明文，须将说明文的特点烂熟于心。说明文的特点主要有说明性、知识性、科学性、实用性。只有很好地掌握了说明文的这些特点，才能将说明文写好

第三，须将说明文的类型分清楚，如果从内容上而言，说明文可分为事物说明文和事理说明文，如果从表达方式上分，可以分为平实说明文和科学小品文事物说明文：以具体事物为说明对象，将事物是怎样的作为说明重点，对事物的状态、性质、功能、构造、发展变化等特征，进行科学说明。事理说明文：以事物的发生，发展变化以及相互联系的成因等为说明对象的说明文，说清怎么样和为什么，使人不仅知其然，还要知其所以然平实性说明文：是指用平实、简洁、明白的语言对事物的外形，内部结构，功用及种属关系加以较客观的说明，用词造句一般不带感情色彩和主观倾向，很少使用描写，更少使用修辞手法

［例文］ 水

在地球上，水是分布最广的一种物质。可以说，地球上到处都是水的寓所。地球上到底有多少水呢？有人粗略地估计，认为整个地球的水量，包括空中、地上、地下的水，总共将近14亿立方公里。

水是无色透明的液体，可为什么大海是蓝的，而湖水是碧绿的呢？原来这是阳光给它们染上的。阳光中的红光、橙光和黄光这些较长的光波被不同深度的水吸收了，蓝光、紫光和一部分绿光的波长较短，一遇到水面便四面散开或反射回来。所以湖水蓝中透绿。海水更深，散射、反射的蓝、紫光更多，就泛碧蓝色了。

比较纯净的水加热到100℃就会沸腾，降低到0℃以下就要结冰。在高山上，只要加热到80℃以上水就会沸腾；海平面上，只要72℃左右水就沸腾；矿井里，水到100℃以上才沸腾。

在大自然中，水无时无刻不在动，不在变，但万变不离其宗，它基本存在三个地方：空气里、地下、地表；它的基本形态是三种：气态、液态和固态。

［评析］这篇给人第一印象是散，其主要毛病是没有按一定的中心组织材料、安排顺序，只是东抓一点，西抓一点，一个方面才说了几句，又急急忙忙去说另一方面。结果是哪一方面都没有说明白。

世界上万事万物，都有其自身的质的规定性，一个事物的特征是区别于其他事物的标志。我们要说明一个事物，必须抓住这事物的特征，才能把被说明的事物准确地清晰介绍给读者，让人们对这事物有确切明白的了解。但事物与事物间的情况又各不相同，有的事物的形态、性质、发展等比较单纯，我们说明这类事物时，不妨将面展得开一点；有的事物的形态、特点等复杂而多样，往往有很多方面的特征。我们在介绍这类事物时，不可能在一篇说明文中面面俱到，只能根据需要，一次谈一两个特征。写这类事物的说明文时，更应该注意把握一个明确的说明中心，并以此安排说明顺序。水这篇主要毛病就是没有抓住一个要说明的中心，并以此组织材料、安排顺序，从而给人的感觉就是散而乱，什么问题均没有说明白。比如水是一种液体，并且具有无色、无嗅、无味的特征，可以这样来说明：

［例文］ 水

水是什么样的物体呢？

水是液体。石块和木块有一定的形状，无论放在桌子上或者盒子里，它们都不会改变自己的形状，都是固体。水就不同，放在圆杯子里就成为圆形，放在方盒子里就成了方形，它没有一定的形状。

水是无色透明的。有人说水是白色的，这话错了。拿水同牛奶比较一下就会明白，牛奶才是白色的，水是什么颜色也没有的。如果把一根筷子插入牛奶里，我们就看不见它。再把一根筷子插入清水中，我们能够透过清水看见插入的筷子。

水是无嗅、无味的。怎样来区分无色透明的烧酒和水呢？光凭肉眼是毫无办法的。只要闻一闻，尝一尝就能正确无误地区分了。烧酒有酒的气味和味道，而水却什么气味，什么味道也没有。

因此，在正常的情况下，水是无色、无嗅、无味的液体。

［评析］这篇说明文抓住了水是无色、无嗅、无味的液体这一特征为的中心，围绕这个中心组织材料，选择了比较说明的方法，拿水同木块、石块比形状，拿水同牛奶比颜色，拿水同烧酒比气味、比味道。相互比较以后，水的特征得到了充分的显示。

在说明事物过程中，为了突出有些比较抽象、陌生，一时难以讲清的事物的特点，增强说明效果，常常要采用比较的说明方法。有比较才有鉴别，比较是人们在认识事物中常用的一种思维方法，把大家熟悉的事物或通俗易懂的道理去和抽象的、陌生的作比较，使大家对事物有所了解，让读者产生由此及彼、由表及里的理解过程，最终充分认识事物的特征。这是因为事物的特征往往可以在同另一事物的比较中显现出来。这里需要指出的是，比较的先决条件是要找出比较事物之间可以值得比较的共同点，然后方能通过比较的方法来同中求异，说明事物的各自特点。换言之，在进行比较时，必须有相同之点才能作比。就拿上文说吧！在就物体的形态来比时，把水和石块、木块相比；就物体的颜色来比时，把水和牛奶来相比。倘若反过来，把水和牛奶放在一起比形态，把水和烧酒放在一起比颜色，岂不引起一片混乱！另外，还要注意到；被比较的事物是说明的对象，用作比较的事物是应该大家相当熟悉和非常具体的。比如上面选用的牛奶、石块等都是熟悉的和具体的，所以大家容易理解、容易接受。如果用作比较的事物比要说明的对象还要难以理解，是陌生的、是抽象的，那么，根本就无法达到说明的目的。

作文练习题

一、（某物）的自述

二、青少年吸烟害处大

三、写一篇说明文，向低年级同学介绍你学得较好的某门课程的学习方法，或是你所擅长的某种技艺、运动，注意综合运用各种说明方法。字数在600字以上。

提示《（某物）的自述》，这是填空式半命题。题面中的自述，规定说明是以第一人称的身份作自我介绍，而作自我介绍的又是某物，这就是说，要求用拟人化的手法介绍某物，要写得人格化，富有情趣，生动活泼。

至于究竟是介绍哪一种物，这可以由作者自己确定，题目对此并无限制。作者确定某物，主要从自己对某物的熟悉，了解的程度决定，应量力而行，不要硬写自己不熟悉、不懂的内容。动手写作之前，还应该认真地收集、查阅有关资料，或向有关人员作些了解，力求对自己所要介绍的某物了如指掌，以免犯知识性、科学性的错误。

写《青少年吸烟害处大》这篇说明文，要抓住青少年这个年龄层次，阐释吸烟害处大的所以然。

一是要避免泛泛而谈，只是一般地说说吸烟害处大，而不是强调吸烟对青少年为什么尤其有害，这就离开了题目的中心；

二是要避免杂乱无序，只是东一点、西一点地说吸烟害处大，而不是按照事理本身的逻辑安排结构，这就不能言之有序；

三是要避免想当然，只是凭自己的道听途说、一知半解去说吸烟害处大，而不是言之成理、言而有据地作科学阐释，这就不能以知益人。

因此，要写好这篇说明文，一定要抓住青少年吸烟害处大这些关键进行具体、详细的说明；要按照由一般到特殊、由浅到深、由近到远的顺序安排结构；要综合运用举例说明、比较说明、数字说明等方法。还要准确运用专门术语。

写一篇说明文，向低年级同学介绍你学得较好的某门课程的学习方法，或是你所擅长的某种技艺、运动，注意综合运用各种说明方法。字数在600字以上这不是一个具体题目，只是对这次写作说明文的一些要求。

这篇说明文的读者对象──低年级同学。

这篇说明文的写作目的──把自己的经验介绍给低年级同学。

这篇说明文的说明重点──怎样学好某门课程。具体来说有：自己对这门课程特点的认识；学习这门课程的过程中行之有效的一些方法；值得注意的一些问题等等。

这篇说明文的说明方法──可综合运用一些说明方法。如下定义、举例、比较、图表、数据等说明方法。

这篇说明文的篇幅──600字以上。

因为是向低年级同学介绍，因此，语言要尽量准确、简明、平实。尽量用深入浅出的话来阐释，举例要结合教材。

因为是向低年级同学介绍，因此，说明顺序要明晰、头绪要简单，如可以采用先总说、后分说、然后再总说的结构、也可以按照自己对这门课程规律性认识的顺序来写。

高考即将到来，语文作文对成绩的影响是很大的，大家一定要多看多练，提升作文水平。小编收集了临场作文的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

1、拿到考试卷，如果完成了基本的填写姓名等程序以后，可以先看看作文题，注意既然要看，就要看得仔细，以免没看清楚，引起错觉，影响后面的正式审题、答题。可以先看有一个准备，但不要先写作文。因为作文太耗时间和精力。考试开始的时候是精力最好的时候，这时候要用来解决前面的基础题。等到正式准备做作文时，还要仔细看题，要确保万无一失!

2、时间安排

花60分钟时间写作文是比较适当的，用8-10分钟构思很重要。因为，一旦写到一定字数发现思路不好，无论时间还是空间都来不及了。相信高考作文审题难度不大，但一定要审，之后再构思基本框架，根据自己的习惯，写个关键字的提纲(自己能看明白就行，主要的立意，哪些材料，还有哪些名言等)，开头部分最好在草稿纸上写好，修改，再誊抄。一定要仔细研究题目，审题不慎，满盘皆输。

3、标题

标题是文章的眼睛，也是阅卷教师对文章的第一印象，自拟题目，要确切、精练、生动、新颖、有意蕴。但坚决不能刻意求新，弄巧成拙!更忌涂改。当然，如果是命题作文，就不必为此烦神了。

4、文体

高考作文通常是“文体不限”(也有要求写议论文和记叙文)，但不代表没有文体，用什么文体写作，就要符合该文体的要求。记叙文要三分之二的篇幅落足于叙述，议论文反之。写记叙文，叙事务必清楚，情节设置或曲折或感人，不能是演绎中心的流水账;注意运用景物渲染和细节刻画、首尾呼应、伏笔过渡等写作技法。议论文，中心要突出，观点要鲜明;文章思路要清晰：或并列，或正反对照，或递进;论据要充分，表达要简洁，要懂得根据论点裁剪材料。还可以采用书信体，但务必符合书信格式，不能出现真实姓名和地点，要情真意切。

5、内容：精彩的构思必须用丰富的内容来支撑，丰富的内容必须紧扣主题。

要注意文章的主题不要偏离社会的主流价值观。虽然现在强调高考作文只要能够自圆其说，怎样的观点都可以，但这里必须有个度，这个度就是社会的主流价值观。不要触及敏感的政治事件，少谈宗教、政治话题，不要单纯发牢骚，不要写早恋、文革、批判政府无能等敏感话题。记叙文最好要有细节描写。推己及人，以情动人。议论文切忌大话、套话、废话，要避免空发议论，无情而“抒情”，无病呻吟，滥提口号，乱发号召，空表决心等等。议论文必须有分析，如果只是材料的堆砌就不叫议论文。

6、结构

高考作文的思路，务必清晰。除掉首尾，中间部分可以采用段首点题的方式，彰显文章的思路;也可以采用小标题的方式组织文章(慎用!)。另外，文章的段落安排，一定不能出现少于五段的情况。最好在5—8个自然段。

7、开头和结尾

考场作文最忌含蓄。高考作文的开头和结尾，必须做到开头起笔入题，结尾点明主旨。要确保开篇简洁，语句通畅，绝对不能出现病句和错别字，书写上也不能涂抹。要充分利用首因效应，在开篇给阅卷者留下良好的第一印象。开篇字数不宜过多，最多五句话，并且一定要有点明文章中心的句子。开篇确立的主旨，一方面要符合题目要求，另一方面必须贯穿全文。切不可前后矛盾。

文章的结尾也是阅卷看得相对仔细的地方。结尾亦不能草率。也要精心构思。或卒章显志，点明主旨;或画龙点睛，升华主题;或预留空白，引发想象或思考;或点题，首尾呼应。

8、语言

应试作文的表述要朴实大方，干净利索。严禁文白夹杂;严禁使用别人看不懂的方言;严禁使用别人看不懂的词汇;少用长句多用短句;尽量避免欧式的语言表述方式;多引用名言警句;引用流行的通俗歌曲歌词;但要注意：在作文中不要插上几句英语或网络语言(广东明令禁止采用)。总之，表达要符合现代汉语的语言规范，要简明、连贯、得体，要准确、鲜明、生动。

9、字数

应试作文一定要看清字数的要求，一定要写够数量或稍微超过50—100字才好。全文不要超过900字，写多了容易画蛇添足。

10、书写与卷面

书写要认真，卷面要整洁。不写繁体字、不写不规范的简化字(注意不要把“己”写成“乙”，注意修改的要求)。特别是民间流传的简化字，可以算作错别字，要扣分的。尽量写楷体字，一笔一画清清楚楚，不要写草字。标点符号，注意格式。近年高考作文评分标准中，“字体工整”是一项重要的评分细则。一般不要求写得好看，但要求书写整齐易辨认。总之，书写规范，卷面整洁，给阅卷老师留下好印象，至关重要!