为什么需要保护野生动物英语作文【精选20篇】

Animals are friends of human beings. Most of them are lovely. I like giraffe the most. They are very tall and have many brown spots. They have very long necks, so that they can eat the leaves in high trees. Giraffes are gentle and lovely. They are friendly to people. When I go to the zoo, I always look at them. They move slowly. I can’t keep it as a pet, because it’s so huge. It’s a big pity.

动物是人类的朋友，大部分的动物都很可爱。我最喜欢的是长颈鹿，它们很高而且又很多棕色斑点。它们的颈很长因此可以吃到大树上的叶子。长颈鹿温驯可爱，它们对人类很友善。当我去动物园的时候我总喜欢去看它们。它们动作缓慢。我不能把它当宠物因为它太大了，这有点遗憾。

大家都认识熊猫，它们既可爱又机灵，不但淘气，还会自我保护。

熊猫很机灵。它经常让小林鼠自己跑出来让它吃，当然也会使用一些计策。

它还很淘气。有时，它趁猎人不在家，大摇大摆地闯进去，偷吃猎人的野味。吃完了，还把勺子仍得远远的，甚至把锅挂在树杈上。

当敌人来时，它能很好地保护自己，不被敌人吃掉。

但是，现在，像熊猫这样可爱的野生动物也越来越少了，豚鹿、梅花鹿那样的之前在小山坡上就能看见的动物，现在早已不见了踪影。

朱鹮、金雕、白鹤这些华丽、美丽的鸟儿们，在几亿年前曾经数不胜数，但现在只能在动物园里才能见到它们的美丽的模样了。

巨蜥、扬子鳄、蟒，这些动物虽然很危险，但也是重要的野生动物物种，对自然界的生态平衡也起着一定的作用。

说到这儿，你们想到了什么呢?我们不能因为他们的肉美味，就随便乱杀。它们可怜，是因为它们的兄弟姐妹越来越少;它们害怕，是因为自己有被杀的风险;它们生气，是因为我们的过度开发，它们的领地已经越来越小了。

从现在开始，不要再乱杀野生动物!从现在开始，不要再大量开发森林!不要再破坏动物和动物的家园吧!

Many wild animals are facing the danger of extinction，because the environment that they are living in has changed greatly。For example，with the developmet of cities，the using of insecticide and serious pollution，their living areas have bee narrowcr and narrower。Many of the wild animals，now are confronted with food crisis。At the same time，man is killing off species just for getting their fur，skin，horns，teeth and meat.In order to protect our resources of ecology，people should realize that the loss of any species is at least the loss of source of knowledge and a source of natural beauty。There fore，measures of the following should be taken:pollution standards are made to keepdown poisons; killing off certain rare species is prohibited; national parks should be set up as wild life，reserves.Only if we human beings take some drastic measures can wild animals be preserved。

人与自然有着密不可分的关系，一直以来，人类的生存与发展都离不开自然。自然有着丰富的资源供人类不断地开发利用，同时它不断给人们以优良新鲜的空气来生存。可以说，没有大自然，就没有人类今日的辉煌。

可悲的是，人类在利用自然时，大大地忽略了自然界的生物，为了牟取暴利，多少人昧着良心残忍地将动物杀害。眼见着藏羚羊只剩骨肉的尸体堆积如山，要的只是一张美的皮毛；老虎数量大幅度地减少，由原先的数以万计到如今的寥寥无几，为的就是虎皮和虎骨。或许那些人的良知早已泯灭，但这一幕幕生灵涂炭、不堪入目的场景不能令我们为之震撼、激愤？金钱能蒙蔽良知，却掩盖不了这悲剧不断地发生、重演。

我一直认为，爱护动物就是保护我们人类自己。试想一下，当地球上只有人类，再无其他生灵时，会是多么悲怆啊！再者，所有的生物组成了一条完整的食物链，人是最高统治者，但当一种又一种的生物灭绝时，食物链必是越来越贫乏，久而久之，当食物链只剩下人时，可想而知谁是盘中餐了吧。

俗语说得好：食在广东。广东一直是美食集锦之地。尤其是野味，在人们眼里是上好的补品，不仅营养丰富，而且味道与众不同。但毕竟是野生动物，在深山老林里带些病毒、寄生物是件平常之事，但一被人吃下去可就不得了了。例如闻其色变的“SARS”病毒就是野生动物传播的。

无论如何，保护动物已成了义不容辞、当务之急的事了，只有人与自然和平共处，才能不断发展、生存下去！

There used to be a lot of tigers. They used to live in the woods and mountains. However, people are cutting down trees and destroying their homes. There are fewer and fewer tigers out there. It is very important to protect the tigers. So, we should protect their homes.

以前有很多老虎。他们住在森林和山里。但是人们在砍伐树木而且毁坏他们的家园。那里有越来越少的老虎。保护老虎很重要，所以我们应该保护他们的家园。

保护动物英语作文二

Animals are close friends of humans. In particular, the existence of rare animals, the whole world has become very colorful.so we should protect the animals as possible we can.

I have recently heard that rare animals in zoos have even suffered from harm, it shocked me deeply. Incident stems from some people is not enough awareness of animal protection and anima indifference.

Bearing in mind the protection of rare animals are the responsibility for each of us, we should publicize its meaning, and to take effective measures.

I think in the near future the world will be more beautiful with our efforts.

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

Panda is known as the national treasure of China. The panda was a kind of ordinary animal in China long ago. However, for some reasons, too many of them have been killed. So the number of them is falling quickly.

At present people are taking an important measure to save pandas. People want to find a home for them, and recently, they have set up a nature park for them in Sichuan Province,which is called "Pandas Home. "There pandas can enjoy their life happily. There is a bamboo forest near the Pandas Home. So the pandas can find bamboos easily which they like to eat very much.

Because pandas are well protected now, the number of them is increasing every year. We hope that one day we will have enough pandas to set them free and let them live in the wild again.

Pandas are good friends of man. Man should try to protect them and ]et them live in the way they like!

I love the earth, love to the survival of our homes. Love her love her castle peak green water, green blue sky...

In the fields in the fragrance of flowers, butterfly and I play together, and laughter; In the lush forest, I chase, singing with a bird; Early in the morning, I go to on the plain with lightsome pace for an outing, mist curl up, white gauze of softly floating in the air. Suck the scent of flowers and plants, we enjoy the sun bath, I was intoxicated in the infatuated fantasy; At night, I sat in the paddy fragrance farm small courtyard, looking at the bright sky, listening to the cicadas liao, pre-pubescent, as if place oneself in a fairytale kingdom.

What a good environment! How can allow damaged?

Human technology, large discharge, endless exploitation of... Dinosaur extinction due to environment, and the human is to destroy themselves?

The historical mission to protect the environment and maintaining ecological balance cross-century generation to fall on our shoulders. Let us to love nature, love the earth, arm in arm, side by side, heart to heart to cast up a green environmental protection levee, defend the resources, protect environment, to defend the earth, to defend our beautiful homeland!

我热爱地球，热爱我们赖以生存的家园。爱她的青山绿水，爱她的碧草蓝天……

在四野飘香的花丛中，我和蝶儿一起嬉戏、欢笑;在郁郁葱葱的森林里，我与小鸟一起追逐、歌唱;清晨，我迈着轻盈的步履去原野上踏青，雾霭缭绕着、白纱般的柔柔地漂浮在空中。吮吸着花草的芳香， 欣享着阳光的沐浴，我被陶醉在这如痴如醉的梦幻里;夜晚，我坐在稻谷飘香的农家小院里，仰望着璀璨的星空，聆听着蝉鸣嘹响，蛙声如潮，仿佛置身于一个童话般的王国。

多么好的环境啊!怎能容许被破坏呢?

人类的高科技，大排放，无止地开采……恐龙因环境而灭绝，而人类却要把自己毁灭掉吗?

保护环境与维护生态平衡的历史重任要落到我们跨世纪一代的肩上。让我们都来关爱自然，热爱地球吧，手挽手、肩并肩、心连心地铸起一道绿色环保的大堤，捍卫资源、捍卫环境、捍卫地球、捍卫我们美好的家园吧!

Marine lives in fish and all kinds of chemical substances,is very important for human.But many people like throwgarbage into the sea,the sea will pollution.Cause fishdeath,water depletion.We should keep our environment,to protect the beautiful sea.

海洋里生存着鱼和各种化学物质,对人类很重要.但是许多人类喜欢向海里投垃圾,海水就会污染.导致鱼儿死亡,海水枯竭.我们应该保持环境,一起保护美丽的大海.

香港环保先驱温石麟在回忆自己怎样走上以保护自然为己任的道路上来时，首先想到的是自己的生物老师——他大学预科的生物教授。这位外籍老师是他爱护自然的最初的带领者。一次，他们去香港海边作海岸生态考察。那位老师站在退潮的烂泥里，告诉正在寻找生物样本的学生们：你们可以取上来观察，但是，完事后要放回原位，因为他们是属于这里的，我们是大自然的观察者，不应该破坏、扰乱大自然的平衡。这位赤脚站在烂泥里的教师，一直引导着他的学生走向尊敬生命、爱护自然的生活。

Environmental protection is our era is full of controversy, but it is very important to protect the environment, how we can do environmental protection, how the most environmentally friendly, how to calculate the environmental protection, in the following, we will know.

Environmental protection refers to environmental protection. Environmental protection refers to the human beings to solve the real or potential problems, to coordinate the relationship between human and environment, to protect the sustainable development of economic society and take the action of the general term.

Now, in our life, the most serious environmental problems is the soil has been destroyed, climate change and energy waste. According to the reference news reported that the 110 countries can reduce the degree of arable land. In Africa, Asia and Latin America, the bare land has become vulnerable due to the disappearance of forest vegetation, the excessive exploitation of arable land and over grazing of pastures. The earth mother has become sallow and emaciated, please take good care of our mother earth. Some experts predicted that in the near future sea level will rise, many islands will be submerged.

How do we stop it? In fact, the protection of the environment is not as difficult as it is, as long as we start from the minor matter, will make the earth a new, for example: more use of environmental protection bags, as far as possible to avoid using plastic bags; as far as possible to take the bus, as much as possible to reduce vehicle emissions; usually more than walking, riding a bicycle, exercise and protect the environment...... In addition and many, many, as long as we start from the minor matter, every a little makes a mickle, will let the escheat of the earth before the appearance.

Let us fight for the future of the earth!

环保是我们这个时代充满争议的流行词，但同时是保护环境中极其重要的一点，我们如何做到环保，如何最环保，怎样才算环保呢，在以下内容中，我们将知道。

环保是指环境保护。环保是指人类为解决现实的或潜在问题，协调人类与环境的关系，保障经济社会的持续发展而采取的各种行动的总称。

现在，我们生活活中，最严重的环保问题就是土壤遭到破坏，气候变化和能源浪费。据参考消息报道，110个国家可耕地的肥沃程度在降低。在非洲，亚洲和拉丁美洲，由于森林植被的消失、耕地的过分开发和牧场的过度放牧，裸露的土地变得脆弱了。大地母亲已经变的面黄肌瘦，请好好保护我们的大地母亲!有专家预计，在不久的将来海平面将升高，很多岛屿都将会被淹没。

那我们该如何制止这一切的发生呢?其实，保护环境并没有想象中的那么难，只要我们从小事做起，就一定会让地球焕然一新的，比如：多使用环保袋，尽量避免用塑料袋;尽量坐公交车，尽可能的减少汽车排放的废气;平时多步行，骑自行车，锻炼身体又保护环境……除此之外，还有很多很多，只要我们从小事做起，积少成多，积沙成塔，就一定会让地球重还以前的面貌。

让我们为地球的将来而奋斗吧!

[关于保护环境的满分英语作文精选

I like a lot of animals, but my favorite animal is the panda. She comes from China, why did I love her? Because she is very cute, but she was very shy. Her body stout like bears, but the first round tail short, black and white fur and white head and body clear. She staple food of bamboo, but also addicted to love drinking water, most of the giant pandas homes are located near the water in streams, the nearest will be able to drink clear spring.

Animals are natural resources that people have wasted all through our history. Animals have been killed for their fur and feathers, for food, for sport, and simply because they were in the way. Thousands of kinds of animals have disappeared from the earth forever. Hundreds more are on the danger list today. About 170 kinds in the United States aloneare considered in danger.

动物是自然资源，人们已经浪费了整个历史。动物已为他们的皮毛和羽毛，食物而被杀，运动，因为他们在路上。成千上万种动物已从地球上永远地消失了。今天，数百人在危险中。对170种美国aloneare危险。

Why should people care? Because we need animals, and because once they are gone, there will never be any more.Animals are more than just beautiful or interesting. They are more than just a source of food. Every animal has its place in the balance of nature. Destroying one kind of animal can create many problems. For example, when farmers killed large numbers of hawks, the farmers stores of corn and grain were destroyed by rats and mice. Why? Because hawks eat rats and mice, with no hawks to keep down their numbers, the rats and mice multiplied quickly.

人为什么要在乎?因为我们需要动物，因为它们一旦消失，就永远不会再出现。动物不仅仅是漂亮或有趣的。它们不仅仅是人类的食物来源。每一个动物在自然界的平衡有它的地方。毁灭某种动物会导致许多问题。例如，当农民杀死为数众多的鹰，他们谷物和粮食的商店被老鼠破坏。为什么?因为鹰吃鼠类，没有鹰控制它们的数量下降，鼠类就会迅速繁殖。

Luckily, some people are working to help save the animals. Some groups raise money to let people know about the problem. And they try to get the governments to pass laws protecting animals in danger. Quite a few countries have passed laws. These laws forbid the killing of any animal or planton the danger list. Slowly, the number of some animals in danger is growing.

幸运的是，有些人正在努力帮助拯救动物。有些组织筹钱以便让人们了解这一问题。他们试图让政府通过保护濒危动物的法律。很多国家已经通过了法律。这些法律禁止任何动物或杀害濒危名单。慢慢地，某些濒危动物的数目正在增长。

Oceans becoming more acidicThe worlds oceans are slowly getting more acidic, say scientists.The researchers from California say the change is taking place in response to higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.The lowering of the waters pH value is not great at the moment but could pose a serious threat to current marine life if it continues, they warn.Ken Caldeira and Michael Wickett, from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, report their concerns in the journal Nature.Increasing use of fossil fuels means more carbon dioxide is going into the air, and most of it will eventually be absorbed by seawater.

Once in the water, it reacts to form carbonic acid.Scientists believe that the oceans have already become slightly more acidic over the last century.But these researchers have tried to predict what will happen in the future by combining what we know about the history of the oceans with computer models of climate change."This level of acidity will get much more extreme in the future if we continue releasing CO2 into the atmosphere," said Dr Caldeira."And we predicted amounts of future acidity that exceed anything we saw over the last several hundred million years, apart from perhaps after rare catastrophic events such as asteroid impacts."If carbon dioxide release continues unabated, ocean pH could be reduced by as much as 0.77 units, the authors warn.It is not absolutely clear what that means for marine life, however.

Most organisms live near the surface, where the greatest pH change would be expected to occur, but deep-ocean lifeforms may be more sensitive to pH changes.Coral reefs and other organisms whose skeletons or shells contain calcium carbonate may be particularly affected, the team speculate. They could find it much more difficult to build these structures in water with a lower pH.In recent years some people have suggested deliberately storing carbon dioxide from power stations in the deep ocean as a way of curbing global warming.But Dr Caldeira said that such a strategy should now be re-considered."Previously, most experts had looked at ocean absorption of carbon dioxide as a good thing - because in releasing CO2 into the atmosphere we warm the planet; and when CO2 is absorbed by the ocean, it reduces the amount of greenhouse warming.

一天，小明走在安静的小路上，突然，他看见草丛里有什么东西。

小明走到草丛前，一看。啊!原来是一只小鸟受伤了。小明心想：这只小鸟好可怜，我还是带小鸟回自己家，给它包扎一下。他手忙脚乱地跑回家。拿起药箱，小心翼翼、轻手轻脚得给小鸟包扎起来了。小明费了九牛二虎之力才把小鸟地伤包扎完了。小明就把小鸟放在一个篮子里。还要每天喂它谷粒吃，真的好辛苦啊!过了几天，小鸟的伤完全康复了。小明就把小鸟放回了美丽的大森林里去了。小明又能看见小鸟在天空中翱翔。心想：我又做了一件保护动物的事情。小鸟也心想：人类是我们的好朋友。

一天，天气晴朗，我吃完早饭，就拿着一个渔网和一个瓶子高高兴兴地去小河边玩。

我看到了小河里有一群群可爱的小蝌蚪，像许多小逗号一样，在水里快活的游了起来游去。我心想：“如果把小蝌蚪捞起来，拿回家，就可以每天玩了”。于是我一下子捞住了几只小蝌蚪，装进瓶子里，高高兴兴地跑回家。

晚上，吃过晚饭，我就坐在沙发上听收音机，收音机里边说了一句话：“保护动物，人人有责”。于是我赶快拿出“动物百科全书”来看，原来青蛙是益虫。

第二天，我拿着瓶子跑到河边把小蝌蚪放了，它好像在说：“小朋友，谢谢你，我一定快快长大变成青蛙，消灭害虫”。

小朋友们，以后我们都要爱护小青蛙，因为它们能吃许多的害虫，保护庄稼，是我们人类的好朋友。

In my mind，nothing can delight me so much as caring for animals.

Wherever I go and whatever I do, I usually keep in mind that animals are angelsfrom the heaven, which bring us endless comfort and pleasure.

I have been apanda lover since my childhood.

Panda is so lovely that brings fun to peopleand they are regarded as the treasure of our country.

Unfortunately，such a rare species is now faced with the danger ofbeing extinct。What I am eager to do is to raise people’sawareness of animal protection and appeal to more people to care for our earthcompanies.

翻译：

我认为，没有什么能够像关心动物一样让我快乐。不管我去到哪里，在做些什么，我会时刻牢记动物是来自天堂的天使，带给我们无尽的舒适和快乐。

我从小开始就是一名熊猫爱好者。熊猫是如此可爱，给人们带来乐趣，而且它们是我国的国宝。不幸的是，这种稀有物种现在正频临灭绝的危险。 我想要做的是提高人们保护环境的意识，呼吁更多的人关心我们地球的伴侣。

[保护熊猫的英语作文4篇

Today, Dameisha took me to see the sea, because I have never seen the sea. I was thinking of the sea all the way. I saw on TV the sea is very beautiful, I feel that the sea should be like this: blue water, spray gently lying in the arms of the sea. On the beach there grows many palm beach, lying quietly in many shells, conch. A few crabs to climb. Should be against the background of blue sky, the sky the sun, seagulls flying, this beautiful picture of you! What an intoxicated! I feel relaxed and happy.

Can be when I saw the sea of a moment, I am disappointed, the mood suddenly changed. Because my eyes of the sea is dark, is muddy, is not angry, is not confident. Some just inferiority. I know that the sea is not so, but people are polluting into this.

Now, human beings in order to live, a large number of cutting trees, cut and not planted, how many of the previous tropical rain forest, now is flat, how many trees, now replaced by high-rise buildings. Factory emissions, air pollution, and no trees to release fresh air. And plant emissions of toxic wastewater, so that water in the small fish, shrimp have been poisoned, and the river afloat smelly fish dead bodies and garbage, all this is how terrible ah!

Lets go and embrace the nature! To protect nature! Let everything in the world be beautiful.

今天，大姨带我去大梅沙看大海，因为我从来没有见过大海。我一路上都在想大海的样子。我看见电视上的大海很漂亮，我觉得大海应该是这样的：碧蓝的海水，浪花轻轻的躺在大海的怀抱中。海滩上生长着许多的椰树，海边静静的躺着许多贝壳，海螺。几只螃蟹爬来爬去。映衬着的应该是蔚蓝的天空，天空上的一轮红日，海欧飞来飞去，这景象多美呀！多令人陶醉呀！我心情轻松愉快。

可当我才看见大海的一瞬间，我失望了，心情一下子变的沉重了。因为我眼前的大海是灰暗的，是浑浊的，是没有生气的，是没有自信的。有的只是自卑。我知道大海原来不是这样的，而是被人们污染成这样的。

现在，人类为了生活，大量砍伐树木，砍了又不栽，以前有多少热带雨林，现在是平地，以前多少树木，现在取而代之的是高楼大厦。工厂排放的废气，污染空气，又没有树木放出新鲜的空气。还有工厂排放出的有毒的废水，让水里的小鱼，小虾都被毒死了，河面上浮着发臭的鱼的尸体和垃圾，这一切又是多么的可怕呀！

让我们去拥抱大自然吧！去保护大自然吧！让世界上的一切都变得美好。

我们要保护野生动物，因为我们保护野生动物，野生动物对我们人类也会很友好。

比如说燕子，燕子能帮我们把田里的害虫吃掉。如果我们人类杀害捕捉它们，它们会吃掉那些常常来搔扰我们的蚊子，让我们更好地生活吗?没有了燕子，我们的周围变得很多害虫，这些害虫对我们人类有很大的坏处呀!

我还举个例子。比如说青蛙，青蛙也能帮我们吃田里的害虫，可以说是田里的警察。我们支捕杀他们，一旦没有了青蛙，田里的害虫越来越多，害虫不断地吃菜，难道我们会有美好的丰收吗?

我还举个例子。比如说啄木鸟，啄木鸟是森林中的医生，它可以帮我们吃掉树里的害虫，让树恢复健康。我们杀害它们，树木的害虫会越来越多，树木会慢慢地减少。地球上没有树，会发洪水、地震。

我最后举个例子。比如说猫头鹰，猫头鹰捉田鼠，是对我们人类有好处的，人类却常常捕猎它们。没有猫头鹰，田鼠会增加。田鼠吃的庄稼和菜就更多了，我们人类一样没有好的收成。

所以，我们要保护以上的动物。同时，我们还要保护其他的野生动物!

2月25日，天气格外的“阴沉”，寒风呼呼的咆哮着，但却没有丝毫影响我们快乐的心情，妈妈带我和妹妹要去杭州野生动物世界玩咯。一路上，4岁的妹妹不停的问我：“姐姐，那里有老虎吗？”“姐姐，猴子屁股是红色的吗？”“姐姐……”

“打住，去了你不是知道了吗？”看着车子缓缓驶进停车场，我的心雀跃起来，终于到了。跨入动物园，映入眼帘的是一个巨大的地球，喷泉喷出的水珠飞舞在空中。远处，动物的叫声此起彼落，我们加快脚步，拐进被绿叶笼罩的的长廊。

走过长廊，我们急忙追上观光火车的脚步。只见火车上是黑压压的一片，好不容易找到了一个位置，就听到了火车启动的声音，太棒了！兴奋的心情早已抵过了寒风吹在脸上的刺痛感，我的眼睛紧紧的盯着窗外，期盼能看到一只动物。快看，是袋鼠，车厢里响起了快乐的吼叫声，哪儿有袋鼠？只见那袋鼠妈妈长着一张长长的脸，雪亮的眼睛如黑珍珠一般璀璨，温和又晶莹，我不禁迷上了这双美丽的眼睛。

我们又乘着游览车，来到了“虎啸深山”。放眼望去，只瞧见了一大片翠绿色树叶密密麻麻的叠在一起，如一片绿色的屏障，可哪儿有老虎的身影？我的眼睛急切地寻找，终于看到了一个虎斑色的身影，是东北虎！看啊，那雄壮威武的东北虎站起来了，只见它昂着头，张着血盆大嘴，打了个哈欠。那尖刀般的牙齿，还真是令人不寒而栗，它那一双绿眼睛射出凶光，比猫咪那温和的眼睛凶猛许多。这时，老虎一声吼叫，就像雷鸣一般，震的整个山头都颤抖起来。它优美矫健的身姿，与刻在骨子里的王者气势，似乎在告诉我们这个世界有了它才耀眼。

接下来的行程，我们看到了大象、狮子、天鹅、斑马、猴子等等很多动物，还看了动物明星们精彩的演出。我和妹妹像两个快乐的小精灵，从头到尾叽叽喳喳、手舞足蹈，直到离开动物园的时候，还是一步三回头，恋恋不舍。

这一次去野生动物世界，收获可真多呀！我觉得我们每个人都应该行动起来，从身边的小事做起，去爱护动物，与他们和平友好的生活在这个世界上。

One day，my mother bought two little rabbits for me.I’m very happy.

From that on，the two little rabbits became my good friends. They have two little ears， red eyes，with white and fat boby. They’re marvellous.

Everyday，they play with each other happily. One day，I couldn’t find them. I asked my mother: ”Where are they? ” My mother told me that She didn’t know. At last，I found them in the grass. They were very dirty. I was angry，but when I looked at their lovely faces，I was happy again.

I love my little rabbits，and they love me. They are my good friends forever.

参考译文：

一天，我妈母亲给我买了两只小兔子。我特别的开心。

从那天起，两只小兔子成为了我的好朋友。它们有两只小小的耳朵，红红的眼睛和一个又白又胖的身子。它们很了不起的。

每日，它们互相玩的很开心。一天，我找不到它们了，我问我的母亲，“它们哪去了？”我母亲告诉我她不清楚。最后，我在草坪发现它们。它们很脏。我很生气，但当我看到它们那可爱的脸，我又开心起来了。

我爱我的小兔子，他们也爱我。它们是我永远的朋友。