为什么需要保护野生动物英语作文【汇集20篇】

星期六，天气晴朗，天空万里无云，一群鸟儿在树上叽叽喳喳地叫个不停，仿佛在唱着一曲曲动听的歌。这时，我看到有一只小麻雀停在我们的车子上。

爸爸急忙把小麻雀赶走，可是小麻雀还是一动不动地停在车子上。一会儿跳来跳去，爸爸就抓住了小麻雀，这时，我仔细地看了看这只小麻雀，它的羽毛还没有长全，还不太会飞，只能在车子上走来走去。我对爸爸说：“爸爸，你别抓呀!我们应该保护动物，不能伤害它们，这样是不对的。”说完，我听到树上的小麻雀不停地叫着，好像在说：“放了小麻雀，放了它!”于是，爸爸就轻轻地把小麻雀放在树枝上，让小麻雀自由自在地在大自然里生活。树上的麻雀们一看到我们把那只小麻雀放了，又叽叽喳喳地叫个不停，好像对我说：“你真是一个保护动物的好孩子。”

假如大自然没有动物，一切事物就没有生机，如果没有小草这些植物，食草的动物就生活不下去。从今天做起，保护动物，关爱生命，做一个大自然的小卫士。

春天到了，春风吹鼓了花苞，也吹来了可爱的小燕子。

一天，兰兰出来透透气，她的小猫也跟在后头。突然，一个黑影子掠过眼前，“哦，是一只小燕子！”兰兰在院子里好奇地来去，“咦？燕子窝在哪儿？”她便好奇地找了起来。

她终于在一丛桃花旁的墙壁上找到了燕子窝。

这时，小燕子正在练习飞行。那是一只羽翼未丰的小燕，只有稀疏的几根羽毛，它飞起来摇摇欲坠。不一会儿，在如兰兰担心的那样，那只小燕子很快就掉在地上。忽然，跟在兰兰身后的小猫窜了出来，它好奇地盯着小燕子，顿时，小猫扑向小燕子，受惊的小燕子惶恐地往一旁一跳，小猫扑了个空。见小燕子有危险，兰兰立刻把小猫抱了起来，小猫挣扎着，仍然妄想着把小燕子置于死地。这时，母燕回来了，在空中完成了一个完美的弧线，敏捷地将小燕子叼起来，衔在巢中，一起分享妈妈带回来的美食。看到小燕子一家团聚，兰兰开心地笑了。

“保护动物，动物是人类的朋友！”让我们一起保护动物，手牵着手，一起创建美好家园！

The earth is home to all of us live together, without the earth, we will not be able to survive. So, we should care for the earth to protect our environment.

Now, the environment and the earth has been destroyed seriously, such as: factories emit smoke, the sky to the blackened, moreover, the factory also emit dirty and smelly sewage, the river was dark; And, whats more, people also deforestation, hits the innocent trees are cut down, from time to time will blow winds.

You look, now the environment has been damaged so serious, we should start from their own care for the earth to protect environment, such as: save every piece of paper, because, each a piece of paper is made from trees, each producing one ton of paper, will burn a few big tree; Save every once electricity, every time because of the electricity, let power plant chimney smoke rose from the...

Human, please take good care of our home, to his home, please take good care of the earth to protect our environment.

地球是我们大家共同生活的家园，如果没有了地球，我们将无法生存。所以，我们要保护环境爱护地球。

现在，环境和地球已经被破坏的很严重了，比如：工厂里排放出滚滚浓烟，把天空都给熏黑了，而且，工厂里还排放出又脏又臭的污水，把小河都染黑了;而且，更严重的是，人们还乱砍乱伐，把一棵棵无辜的大树都砍伐倒了，时不时就会刮起一阵阵狂风。

大家快看，现在环境已经被破坏的如此严重了，我们应该从自身做起保护环境爱护地球，比如：节约每一张纸，因为，每一张纸都是用大树做的，每产一吨纸，就要消耗几棵大树;节约每一度电，因为每发一次电，就要让发电厂的烟囱冒出滚滚浓烟……

人类们，请大家爱护自己的家园，为了自己的家园，请大家保护环境爱护地球。

“我想回家，我想找妈妈……”一阵阵声音从教室里传出来，原来这是小鱼的呼唤。如果让你关在屋子里不出去，你会不会感到不快乐？鱼儿也一样！

在今天的教室里，多了几条活泼可爱的小鱼，看着它们在鱼缸里转来转去，一个声音从我的心中传出：“让小鱼儿回家吧，让它得到属于自己的自由！”于是，我们在老师的带领下，准备去放生小鱼。

走在山间的小路上，我不由得心想：我是多么依依不舍呀！我抱着鱼缸不敢走得太快，怕鱼儿在鱼缸里会动荡不安，可又怕走得太慢会让它在水中的伙伴等得太久。我们好不容易走到了盘龙山脚下，啊，这里山清水秀，鸟语花香，真的让人流连忘返！

我们来到池塘边，池塘里的水清澈见底，碧波荡漾，不时有黑色的小蝌蚪在水中自由自在地游着，好不快活！

准备放生了，我们小心翼翼地将小鱼倒入水中，那一刻，我是多么地不舍呀！小鱼在水里游来游去，像是在感谢我们，又像在和我们告别……可我硬是转身离开了，心里异常沉重。回去的路上我看到路旁的小草在向我点头，玉兰树似乎在向我点赞。我的心情也逐渐好转了，因为我知道我今天做了一件令自己都敬佩的事！

“劝君莫食三月鲫，万千鱼仔在腹中。”我们一定要保护动物，让所有的动物朋友都能得到属于自己的自由和快乐！

To protect the environment, as early as in "no desiccation jersey have fish, deforestation and hunting," the old adage. Today, we should know how to protect the environment is to protect ourselves, we not only use resources rationally, whenever they better protect the environment, let environment eternal youth, always service for our human survival and development, as a student, is now mainly to create a green campus.

Have a period of time, the campus of debris-brick everywhere, forget to turn off the faucet spouted flow a... Corridor between, not to mention the, everyone has experience, after the sweeping, turn round and then will find that the ground has been some people into different ornament, these things often let me hanging with ancient, these cases often let me deadly serious today, the campus is a small society, students in the campus of a management system cannot achieve good care environment, out of the campus into society, the environment, and how? Thats more dare not imagine.

The classmates, save our earth! You should immediately take action, starts from the minor matter, starts from now, start from the care for the campus environment. We picked up a piece of paper, a drop of water, we save, a heap of rubbish, we clean the, we love a tree seedlings, a frog, a blade of grass, plant a tree, the environmental protection as own duty, use own practical action to protect the environment, to create a green campus.

保护环境，早在“不涸泽有鱼，不焚林而猎”的古训。在今天，我们更应懂得保护环境就是保护我们自己，我们不仅合理利用资源，更竭心尽力保护环境，让环境永葆青春，永远为我们人类的生存发展服务，作为学生，现在主要是创建绿色校园。

得有段时间，校园里果皮纸屑随处可见，忘关掉的水龙头哗哗地流着……楼道间，就更不用说了，大家是有亲身体验的，扫完后，转身就会发现地面已被有些人点缀成另一番景象，这些事情常让我吊怀远古，这些情况常让我警言今日，校园就是个小社会，同学们在有管理制度的校园中都不能做到爱护环境，走出校园，进入社会这一大环境，又能怎样呢?那就更不敢设想了。

同学们，救救咱们的地球吧!大家应立即行动起来，从小事做起，从现在做起，从爱护校园环境做起。一片纸，我们捡起，一滴水，我们节约，一堆垃圾，我们打扫，我们爱一棵苗，保一只蛙，种一根草，栽一棵树，把保护环境作为自己应尽的义务，用自己的实际行动保护环境，创建绿色校园。

蝴蝶、狐狸……这些小动物尽管十分弱小，可是它们却有着让人不得不佩服的“自我保护大绝招”。

一说到狐狸，人们立刻会想到”狡猾”这一词。没错，狐狸是非常狡猾的动物，一旦发现猎人，它便会悄悄地跟在猎人后面，等猎人布置好了陷阱，狐狸就在陷阱旁边留下一种特殊的气味。当然，我们无法闻到这一气味，只能用特殊的科学仪器才可以检测出来。只要另一只狐狸闻到了这种气味，就绕过机关。所以猎人们总是很奇怪：狐狸怎么这么难捉呢?

蝴蝶尽管没有狐狸那样的机智，可是它一旦遇到敌害，就立即使出它的第一招——“隐身术”，飞入花丛中去，并使翅膀像花一样平展开来，使敌害分不清哪一个是花儿，哪一个是蝴蝶。如果被敌害辨认出来，蝴蝶便使出第二招：飞到敌害的眼旁，撒出一种粉末，使敌害睁不开眼睛，趁机逃之天天。

陆地上的动物都有自我保护妙招，海底生物当然不能落后了!大家来看看它们的神通吧：

刺纯生活在地中海，全身长满了刺，平时贴在身上，一旦遇到危险，便立刻大口喝海水，使身体膨胀成球形，针刺向外竖起，静候敌犯。

海底的鼠鱼一旦遇到了天敌，肠子立即产生一种气体，肚子急剧膨胀，使体积增大好几倍，如同一只充满氢气的气球，迅速浮上海面，逃出敌手。

隐鱼自我保护的方式很妙，时常躲进海参肚子里，从肛门进去，从口中出来，有时海参遇到侵害，经常会丢下下半截，隐鱼就在劫难逃。大家不用为海参担心，因为这也是海参的自我保护方法之一，再过几天，海参就会长出新的下半截。

I have a white dog.Its name is Bobo.She is a female dog.She comes from Beijing,China.She has two big eyes and a small month.She wears white clothes.

She often walks around at home.It has nothing to do.She likes eating ice-cream so much,So do I.When I eat ice-cream,she will look at the ice-cream carefully.So I will give her some to eat.

动物是我们人类的好朋友，我们不能伤害它们，但有些人却为了自已的利益，不顾那些可怜的小动物的生命，去践踏它们，捕杀它们。

记得那是今年暑假的一天，我和姥姥在公路的一边坐着聊天，我看见一只小猫想穿过马路去吃对面的一块肉，谁知，小猫刚走到马路中间，一辆大卡车过来了，司机先生一边按喇叭，一边嘴里骂道：“死猫走开。”小猫还没理解了司机的意思，司机先生已不耐烦了，他一踩油门，一个小生命就这样死在了满载货物的大卡车的车轮下。我看着这一幕又气愤又伤心，为了纪念这只可怜的小猫，所以我想把这一天——7月2日设立为保护动物节。

到了每年的这一天，人们都要为保护动物做贡献，要让小动物轻松愉快地度过这一天，不能让它们受到伤害，小动物不管到了谁家，人们都要热情招待它们，最后，我们还要用各种不同的方式去宣传小动物对人类的帮助。让世界上的每一个人都要保护小动物。

我盼望这个节日早日诞生。

在我们生存的环境中，动物一直都和我们形影不离。

我们常见的动物又小鸟、青蛙、蜜蜂、鱼，还有很多家畜等等。

针对不同的动物，我们有不同的看法，理论上对于苍蝇、老鼠、蟑螂等害虫，人们总是抱着杀之而后快的心理，可还有更多的动物，它们是间接或是直接为人类服务的，是人类的朋友，我们应该去保护它们。

猫是一种家养的动物，看上去活泼可爱，它有一种本能就是抓老鼠，而老鼠是最怕猫的，也是人类最痛恨的，因此我们应该保护猫。

青蛙是一种夏天在水边常见的动物，它们以吃害虫为生，在有水的庄稼地里，它们会吃掉所有的害虫，让庄稼长的粗壮高达，因此我们应该保护青蛙。

蜜蜂是一种在花丛中经常出没的小动物，它们会采集花粉，制成蜂蜜，同时能让各类植物得以授粉结果，促进植物生长。科学家爱因斯坦曾经说过：“如果蜜蜂消失，人类最多只能活四年。”可见蜜蜂的重要性，因此我们应该保护蜜蜂。

当然也不是一概而论，比如说：狼、蛇、老虎，等凶猛动物，人类很害怕他们，可并不能说要消灭它们，甚至有些还需要去刻意保护它们。因为它们有很多正在逐年减少，乃至灭绝。追根求源是因为人类的高速发展，无休止的猎杀等等，破坏了生态平衡，动物们的食物链出现了断层，久而久之，人类会自食其果，导致毁灭。

保护动物，是我们当代文明人面临的一个重要问题，该如何去保护，值得我们深思。我认为保护动物应从我做起，不去恶意的捕杀小动物，对珍惜动物更应实施法律保护。对于生长繁殖快的有害动物，适当的予以杀灭，其中还有很多细节需要深思。

保护动物，让动物和我们共同健康的生活在我们美丽的家园吧!

导语：小时候的我们都喜欢吃糖，可是糖吃多了，我们的牙齿就不好了，我们要保护好我们的牙齿，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的相关英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

My mother always tells me not to eat too much candy, but I just couldn’t control myself. Once, I felt my teeth hurt and did not feel like eating. My mother took me to see the dentist and I was so afraid. The doctor used his machine to fix my teeth, I was terrified and cried. Since then, I realize the importance of taking care of my teeth. So I do not eat the candy too often. I will wash my teeth before I sleep, what’s more, the ice food and the sour food will be rejected by me. My friends envy me for having the white teeth, for I look so healthy and beautiful.

【参考译文】

我的妈妈总是告诉我不要吃太多的糖果,但我就是无法控制自己。有一次,我的牙齿很疼,不想吃东西。妈妈带我去看牙医,我很害怕。医生用他的机器修理我的牙齿,我吓坏了,哭了。从那时起,我意识到保护牙齿的重要性。所以我经常不吃糖果。在我睡觉之前我要刷牙,而且,我不吃冰的食物和酸的食物。我的朋友羡慕我有洁白的牙齿,因为我看起来很健康又美丽。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

The picture shows the pollution caused by chimneys of the factories in cities. Often, the sky is covered by large clouds of smoke from chimneys. The air is nearly suffocating, especially in the evening as it becomes cold and the smoke is spreading everywhere. The scene reminds us of the end of the world.

From the picture we can infer that the drawer of the picture intends to convey to the readers that unplanned factories has brought about great hazards to the city air condition. Due to planning mistakes, factories were usually placed in the center of cities, among residential and business districts. Besides, nearly every block has several chimneys for the heating system, which makes the whole city immersed in thick columns of smoke. As a result, respiratory diseases have been reported to be rising and old people dying of the worsening air pollution.

Pollution is really a hot issue in the world. If we don’t take useful measures, we may live in terrible surroundings, and some unexpected results may come out in the end. So, what we should do is to bring down the problems caused by chimneys. For one thing, factories with chimneys should be moved out of the center of the city and it should be made sure that the waste gases are at least not poisonous. For another, other means of heating should be developed to stop using coal. In a word, in the city there should be no coal, no chimney, and no smoke to pollute the air.

we all know that the panda is a kind of lovely animals, but its behavior, some children are not completely know. In order to solve this mystery, recently I have made an observation about it.

The panda is a kind of precious animal, is very attractive. Its shorter in four rubber slow action. On the face of fuzzy embedded with a pair of black eyes. Combined with a black and white hair, more beautiful and lovely.

Pandas like to walk leisurely on the flat ground, play happily. Sometimes looked up people, sometimes low head, as if in search of something, and like to think. When it is happy, somersault on the ground, like a big ball rolling on the ground.

The panda when sleeping, belly up. Sometimes, patting his stomach with his front PAWS, sometimes, it push to the legs, was turned over. I thought it waked up, in fact, it is still in sleep. Waked up just turn it up, with his front PAWS rubbed his change to eyes, curiously at the people, with for she walked away to the other side of the fence to sit down, as if to clear his mind. (pupil composition nets)

When the panda eat, often straight body sitting cross-legged, PAWS grab fresh bamboo leaves to her mouth. It loves to eat fresh bamboo leaves, bamboo stem, and milk and eggs. Pandas eat and drink drink throat. It came to the pool, fell down, the ball pool, lower the head, plump plump to drink up. See the face of it, really makes people laugh.

The panda is one of the worlds rare animals, is a darling of the zoo. Its every move, add fun to tens of thousands of visitors.

Oh behalf of the University Students’ Union， I， the Chairman of the Union ， am earnestly calling for yo ur active participation in our environmental protection campai gn. It is the duty of every global villager; man just can not sustain his glorious c i vilization without a rewarding environment， which will be possible only if man makes considerable efforts to protect the environment.

Do you cherish precio us opportunities to volunteer in our joint efforts in environmental protection? Here is a great one not to be missed by any enthusiastic youth; Right next Saturday， our university is to run a publicity campaign to advocate environmental protection across the city. The University Students‘ Union will be in charge of recruitment of volunteers. Let’s join our h ands and take action immediately.

哦代表大学生联盟,联盟的主席,我认真要求字数积极参与我们的环保信缘gn。全球每一个村民的责任;人就不能维持他的光荣c vilization没有有益的环境,这将有可能只有让人相当大的努力来保护环境。

你珍惜precio我们志愿者的机会在我们的共同努力,环境保护?这是一个很好的一个不容错过的青春热情,下星期六,我们的大学是运行一个宣传活动,倡导环境保护整个城市。大学学生会将负责招募志愿者。让我们加入h and并立即采取行动。

[英语作文如何保护环境

There are all kinds of animals in the world . My favorite animal is rabbits. It has two long ears, a pair of red eyes, and a short tail. It likes jumping. It likes eating carrots and cabbages. It is one of the worlds most lovely animals.

In our country, the number of wild animals is becoming smaller and smaller. Some of them are even dying outThe dangerous methods we human being has taken are as follows:

We have been cutting the trees to build houses, so the home of animals is intruded and they have to find new places to live. In this process, some of them died in the new environment.

The abuse of pesticide has also been endangering the life of wild animals.

In addition, in order to earn money, people have been killing the rare wild animals.

In that we have realized the threat of our behavior to our best friends, we should take actions to change such a condition by taking the following methods:

We should protect the wild animal by protecting the environment that they live in and protect themselves, not to hurt them. At the same time, we should establish more natural reserves for the wild animals.

I believe as long as work together to protect the wild animals, our life will be more and more comfortable.

保护动物

It was a fine day today and the sun was bright。 I visited Beijing Zoo with my classmate， He Song。 The animals were so interesting that all the people loved them。 When a bear asked for some food by waving its ann， a visitor threw something to it。 At once I went up to him and said without thinking，Dont do that。 Its bad for it。 If you really love them， take good care of them。 His face turned red and answered he wouldnt do that again。

这天是个风和日丽的好天，我和同学贺松去了北京动物园。动物们是那么可爱，大家都十分喜欢它们。一只熊挥动着胳膊向人们要吃的，一个游客就投进去了什么东西。我想都没想就走过去说：“不要那样做。你的做法对它们没好处。如果真的喜欢它们，就就应爱护它们。”他的脸红了，并且回答说他不会再那么做了。

This is the composition about to protect and love our environment. Indeed, we only have one earth, it is essential and imperative for us to treat it nicely. Or else, we will be the one suffering. As a matter of fact, a great number of animals and plants had extinct. All this was substantially because of we human being. And a large number of them are endangered. If this does not imply that we are not obliged to do something, the world is going insane and will be destroyed. To stop this from happening, we have many options. First and foremost we should start from ourselves. Do as what a perfect citizen should do. Then, restrain the factories from polluting, this can be done by establishing laws and rules. If we united as one, nothing is impossible.

In order to support Beijing to hold the 2008 Olympic Games and protect our environment,an activity was organized by the Young League and Students Union of our school during the week from June 3rd to June 8th.

All the students in the senior grades took active part in it.Some students cleaned the playground,watered the young trees and flowers,and removed weeds.Some students collected waste paper,old books,empty cans and old toys.They had them sorted and sent them to the recycling center.

The activity is really instructive.Now we all have realized how important protecting the environment is.

I love how they decide to sit by me,whatever room of the house I am in,and sleep in my empty bed next to me.I love how they use their noses as tools to make me pet them.I love how they smell like corn (more like corn chips,its just a dog thing) after theyve been asleep or while they are sleeping.I love my puppy who I will have to say goodbye to soon.I will miss everything about him but I love the time I have spent with him.Whatever happened with me and the ex,he sure did raise a hell of a dog.Or maybe it was just my dogs own self,maybe he was just always going to turn out that loving.Either way,I love them and think they have saved my life.

[写动物的英语作文100字

阳光灿烂的一天，小熊在家里看电视。电视上说废旧电池有很大的危害。小熊看到以后，心急如焚，自言自语地说：“废旧电池对环境会造成很大的污染要怎么办呢？”小熊一直想啊想啊……突然它眼睛一亮，想出了个好点子。小熊准备组织一个回收废旧电池的活动。

于是小熊向邻居小袋鼠借了一辆三轮车，在车前挂了个牌子，上面写着：“回收废旧电池，送花一盆。”接着小熊把自己种的的花朵插在花盆里，有各种各样的花，五颜六色，真漂亮。鲜花整整齐齐地摆放在三轮车上，小熊和小袋鼠就高高兴兴地出发了。小袋鼠拿着一个喇叭在喊：“回收废旧电池喽！回收废旧电池喽！送花啦，送花啦！”

这时，小兔子兴高采烈地跳到小熊面前，拎着一袋废旧电池，电池有红的、蓝的……小兔兴高采烈地说：“小熊，我有废旧电池要给你。”小熊高兴得手舞足蹈，接过电池后，给了小兔一盆红彤彤的的玫瑰花。小猪见了也急匆匆地跑回家拿来一袋废旧电池给小熊，小熊也同样给小猪一盆鲜花。接着小动物们也纷纷带着旧电池来了。

最后小熊收集了满满一车的废旧电池，它高兴极了！它把这些废旧电池送到回收站，然后它就高高兴兴地回家了。我们要向小熊学习，不能随手乱扔废旧电池哦，要做一个爱护环境的好孩子！