为什么需要保护野生动物英语作文（精品20篇）

Panda is our country’s treasure,we should protect it.nowadays,we see from the TV that panda is less than before,it is not only because of the damage of the environment,but also the weakness of the panda.Everybody loves panda,it is so lovely,a panda has two black eyes,it is very lazy,it likes sleeping all the time.When we see its round body shape,we can’t help loving them.In order to see the lovely animal,we need to protect them.We must protect the environment,like not to throw the rubbish away,not to cut down the trees.We condemn such behavior that killing the animals.Protecting the animals is everybody’s job.

熊猫是我们国家的珍宝，我们应该保护它。现在，我们可以从电视上看到熊猫比以前少，这不仅因为环境的破坏，还因为熊猫自身的脆弱。

大家都喜欢熊猫，它很可爱，熊猫有两只黑色的眼睛，很懒，总是在睡觉。当我们看到熊猫圆圆的身形时，忍不住喜欢它们。

为了看到这些可爱的动物，我们需要保护它们。

我们必须保护环境，比如不随处扔垃圾，不砍伐树木。我们谴责杀动物的行为。保护动物，人人有责。

[怎么保护熊猫英语作文

一天，小明走在安静的小路上，突然，他看见草丛里有什么东西。

小明走到草丛前，一看。啊!原来是一只小鸟受伤了。小明心想：这只小鸟好可怜，我还是带小鸟回自己家，给它包扎一下。他手忙脚乱地跑回家。拿起药箱，小心翼翼、轻手轻脚得给小鸟包扎起来了。小明费了九牛二虎之力才把小鸟地伤包扎完了。小明就把小鸟放在一个篮子里。还要每天喂它谷粒吃，真的好辛苦啊!过了几天，小鸟的伤完全康复了。小明就把小鸟放回了美丽的大森林里去了。小明又能看见小鸟在天空中翱翔。心想：我又做了一件保护动物的事情。小鸟也心想：人类是我们的好朋友。

濒危动物是指所有由于物种自身的原因或受到人类活动或自然灾害的影响，而有灭绝危险的野生动物物种。从广义上讲，濒危动物泛指珍贵、濒危或稀有的野生动物。

保护濒危动物的作文400字（一）

我们不应该去破坏他们安详和谐的生活，我们也无权去破坏他们的生活，当然，更没有理由去指责伤害他们。

每当我们的饭桌旁摆上一道道香喷喷的菜，比如：蛇、青蛙、等动物。我们是不是应该想一想，我们每吃一种动物，就等于放走了多少对农民对庄家有害的虫。我们更是不是也应该换位思考一下，它们都在齐心协力的抓害虫，可人类不但不领情，反而把它们当做他们的食物，当作我们人类每天赚钱的东西，他们是多么可恶呀！

如今，地球上的许多生物已经很罕见了，甚至有的已经濒临灭绝了！如果地球上没有了动物，地球将会变成什么样，人类又将会变成什么样？

我想，是我们人类好好反省的时候了，如果再这样下去的话，我们将会成为动物们的敌人了，更别谈什么“与狼共舞”

人类，快点醒醒吧！保护野生动物，现在开始，还来得及！

保护濒危动物的作文400字（二）

动物是人类的朋友。动物离不开人类，同样，人类也离不开动物。

很久很久以前，动物和人类是一对好朋友。他们互相帮助、互相依靠、和睦相处，谁也离不开谁。但是，随着时间的推移，由于人类自身的原因，造成了动物与人类的关系恶化，而且有越来越严重的趋势。

首先，人类对动物的肆意捕杀，一方面造成了动物的大量减少，另一方面也造成了动物对人类的敌意不断增强，一定程度上破坏了动物与人类的友好关系。事实上，一直以来，人类残害动物的行为一直没有停息过，吃孔雀、吃猫头鹰、吃猴脑、吃丹顶鹤、吸熊胆，真是到了“万物皆入口”的地步！您想，这样怎么能不引起动物的愤怒呢？怎么能让动物不挺身而出、奋起反击呢？这也是造成了动物攻击人类、甚至伤害人类生命的重要原因。

其次，随着人类社会的不断进步，人类自身的一些不良行为，不仅破坏了地球环境，也破坏到了动物的生存环境。工厂的污水、汽车的尾气、对森林的过度砍伐等不良行为，都对大自然造成了严重的破坏，同时也对生存在大自然的动物造成了直接的伤害，使动物生存艰难，种类、数量越来越少，破坏了整个生态系统的平衡，最终使人类走向灭亡。

可见，动物与人类的关系已经到了严重恶化的地步，同时，也威胁到了人类自身的生存。人类难道还能这样执迷不悟、不知悔改吗？！我想，人类应该及时改变自身的不良习惯，爱护动物，保护地球环境。

作为一名小学生，我们应该从我做起，从现在做起，爱护我们的大自然，保护我们周围的动物。

让我们大家一起行动起来，爱护动物，善待动物，成为动物的好朋友，为改善动物与人类的关系做出自己应有的贡献吧！

保护濒危动物的作文400字（三）

当你品尝着一盘盘山珍海味时，你是否想过动物们正在一批批的减少？当你捕杀着一只只动物时，你是否听到动物在哭泣呢？美食家们，你们是否能让死去的动物一一复活？捕猎者，你是否能让动物死而复生回归大自然吗？

众所周知现在产于中国的野生动物越来越少了。野马 、高鼻羚羊、糜鹿等10余种动物已经完全绝迹，而大熊猫、长臂猴、老虎、野象、白鳍豚等十几种野生动物正面临灭绝的趋势！由于一小部分的人的无知，贪婪，愚昧，到处捕杀动物使得地球生态不平衡，造成了不可估量的损失！

自然界的变化和人类的人为活动也是有关系的，如战争、资源开发、人口增长及农村城市化等，造成了生存环境恶化，使得动物资源又一次遭到严重的破坏，濒危的野生动物日益减少。人们随意破坏生态平衡，大量捕杀动物，把捕到的猎物一一卖给饭店、宾馆、酒楼等，然后做成菜，再已高价卖给食客进行食用。饭店、宾馆、酒楼就为了钱杀死了这么多无辜的生命，满足某些人的嗜好。人们啊，醒醒吧！保护动物也就是保护我们自己。杜绝乱捕乱杀，让我们和动物生活在同一片蓝天下。

让我们从小做起，保护野生动物，关心野生动物，让更多人都能投到保护野生动物的行动中来。

Pet Raising

饲养宠物

Nowadays, with the improvement of the people’s living standard, some people form a habit of raising small or domestic animals as pets. Some raise small dogs or cats as their pets while others raise various birds or fishes as their pets.

如今，随着人们生活水平的提高，有些人形成饲养小的动物或者家禽作为宠物的一个习惯。有些人养小狗或猫作为宠物而有些人则饲养各种鸟类和鱼类为他们的宠物。

However, some people object to the idea of raising animals as pets. To them, animals have their own right to live a natural life like human beings. On the other hand, the way people raise animals as pets have a negative influence on the surroundings ,for example, dogs’ chasing people on the street and so on. What’s more, some animals will transmit some diseases.

然而，一些人反对饲养动物为宠物。对他们来说，动物们就像人类一样，有过自然生活的权利。另一方面，人们养宠物对环境有负面影响，例如，狗在街上追赶人等。更重要的是，有些动物会传播疾病。

In my opinion, I do not like the idea to raise animals at pets. We should not deprive them of their natural right. In this way, we will live in a peaceful world in harmony with the other living creatures.

在我看来，我不赞成。我们不能剥夺他们的自然生活的权利。在这种方式中，我们将与其他生物生活在一个和平的和谐世界。

[我最爱的宠物英语作文

At present,the endangered animals are increasingly fast.How to protect them become our priority.People are crazy about killing animals for their meat, fur.But it is wrong because that animals are our friends, we should try to protect them,instead of killing them to die out. Pandas are represents of endangered animals, which live in the forest and live on bamboos for food. They only depend on the nature reserves to live. We should stop killing animals, and protect them better

经典保护环境英语作文范文

It is very important to deal with the rubbish in cities. Rubbish must be thrown away or reused properly. Or it may cause a lot of problems. It may pollute the air and water. People may get ill when they breathe the polluted air or drink the polluted water.

Our city has started to face the problem. Some rubbish is sorted and sent to a certain place .Waste gas is cleaned before it goes into the air. Waste water is also cleaned before it is poured into rivers.

People should be prevented from throwing rubbish everywhere. We should try our best to take care of our environment and fight against pollution.

这是处理城市垃圾非常重要。垃圾必须扔掉或者重用。或者它可能会导致很多问题。它可能会污染空气和水。人可能生病时呼吸受污染的空气或饮用受污染的水。

我们的城市已经开始面临的问题。一些垃圾分类并送到某个地方。废气进入空气之前清洗。废水也在它倒入河流清洁。

人们应该阻止到处扔垃圾。我们应该尽我们最大的努力去保护我们的环境，与污染作斗争。

As we all know, the environment around us is getting worse and worse /more and more seriously today. Water is polluted, we have no clean water to drink. Many trees are cutting down, some animals are getting less and less. Some factories are pouring dirty air into the sky. The population is increasing faster and faster, resources are getting less and less…etc. Not only does it affect our lives and health, it also has a great affection in the future. People’s health has been greatly affected by air, noise and water pollution. Many people died of diseases. In order to live a better life, something must be done to stop the pollution. It’s our duty to protect our environment. We shouldn’t throw away rubbish everywhere. Trees are very helpful and important for us. We should plant more and more trees in order to live better and more healthy in the future.

If everyone makes contribution to protecting the environment, the world will become much more beautiful. In a word, if everyone pays more attention to our environment, there will be less pollution and our life will be better. “There is only one earth”, I hope everyone will protect our environment well.

[英语作文保护环境200字

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

Panda is one of the scarcest animals.People in the world like it very much.There used to be many pandas in China long ago.As the balance of nature was destroyed and the weather was getting warmer and warmer,pandas became less.But at present,the number of pandas is increasing year by year.There are now so many pandas that some are being sent to other countries so that people there can enjoy them.

Nowadays,the biggest nature park for panda in China is in Sichuan.There is a research centre for nature and wild life there.Scientists hope that one day they will have enough pandas to be set free and let them live in the wild again.

熊猫是最稀缺的动物之一。人非常喜欢。曾经有许多大熊猫在中国很久以前。作为自然的平衡被毁,天气越来越暖和了,熊猫变得更少。但目前,熊猫的数量逐年增加。现在有很多熊猫,一些被发送到其他国家,这样人们可以享受他们。

如今,最大的自然公园熊猫在中国是在四川。有一个研究中心的自然和野生动物。科学家们希望有一天他们会有足够多的熊猫时,被释放,让他们重新生活在野外。

Dolphin

In the vast ocean live many creatures with great intellectual and physical capacities.Dolphin is one of those great creatures,whose capacities to think and move at an astounding rate puzzle those who study their behaviors,Dolphins possess something that makes them different from all the other sea creatures.It is not strength or speed but the size of their brains.Dolphin s brain is almost the same size as that found in the human head.They live for a ling time.

Dolphins babies are born in the water.They can grow up to three and a half meters long.

Dolopins use sound to help them find their way,look for their food and talk with each other.Sound is just like their eyes and mouths.

海豚

大海里住着许多智力发达、身体强健的动物,海豚就是其中之一.它反应灵敏、动作迅速,让那些研究它们行为的人们深感震惊.海豚拥有一些与其它海洋生物不同的地方,它的优势不在于它的力量和速度,而在于它的大脑.海豚的大脑与人脑大小一样大.它们的寿命很长.海豚在水里生育,它们能长到三点五米长.

海豚利用声音帮助自己认路、觅食与彼此之间交谈.声音就像它们的眼睛和嘴一样.

导语：你有养过小动物吗?你最喜欢的小动物是什么呢?下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

My favourite animal is tortoise. Tortoise walk not fast. But I like the tortoise. Why? Because, tortoise is a cute animal. It have a short tail and a four short foot. It have a little head and a hard shell. They are forty-five little and cute tortoise in My home. They like to play in the water. When they afraid some thing. They wall run fast. They like to eat the fish. I often buy some small fish to them to eat. They can catch the fish fast. First, they fake(假) sleep. When the fish swim near they mouth. They catch the fish fast and bit the fish head. So, the fish die. They can eat the fish. In winter. They like to sleep in the sand. When they sleep, they don’t eat any food.Because

they wall hibernation. But, when they are thirsty. They come out of the sand. So, we must give water to them to drink.

I love the tortoise. I hate the eagle. Because, the eagle often eat the tortoise with it sharp mouth.My favourite animal is tortoise.

英语作文翻译：

我最喜欢的动物是乌龟。乌龟走不快。但我喜欢乌龟。为什么?因为乌龟是一种可爱的动物。它有一个短尾巴和一四短脚。它有一个小脑袋和一个硬壳。他们是我家里四十五只可爱的小乌龟。他们喜欢在水里玩。当他们害怕某些事情。他们墙跑得快。他们喜欢吃鱼。我经常买一些小鱼给他们吃。他们能很快抓到鱼。首先，他们伪造(假)睡眠。当鱼儿游近它们的嘴。他们抓鱼快，咬鱼头。所以，鱼死了。他们可以吃鱼。在冬天。他们喜欢睡在沙滩上。当他们睡觉时，他们不吃任何食物。

他们墙冬眠。但是，当他们渴了。他们从沙子里出来。所以，我们必须给他们水喝。

我爱乌龟。我恨鹰。因为，鹰经常用它锋利的嘴吃乌龟，我最喜欢的动物是乌龟。

我喜欢的小动物是黄雀。黄雀嘴巴尖尖的、小小的，长着一对黑黑的小眼睛。它还有一身漂亮的绒毛，可讨人喜爱了。

一天放学刚回家，就听见黄雀发出了清脆的响亮鸣叫声，我连忙跑过去看。哪知黄雀见我过来，竟不叫了。我有些失落，正要回房间写作业，却发现黄雀吃起食物来了。只见它用嘴啄着用谷子做成的鸟食，时不时又去小杯子里喝一些清水。最令我惊奇的是，黄雀居然会吐壳!是的，它每吃一颗谷子就会有谷子壳落在它的笼子里，可小黄雀还是有点不讲卫生，有些谷子壳掉到笼子外面了。它眯着眼睛，完全一幅惬意样，可真是可爱呀!

还有一次，黄雀把水喝完了，妈妈把它专用的小杯拿出来倒水。我趁机把手伸进笼子，摸了摸黄雀的毛。它的毛很柔软，让人感觉很舒服。黄雀也把身子缩成一团，小眼睛注视着我，活像一个小毛球。我笑了笑，把手松开，关好笼子，它便像从前那么活蹦乱跳了。

听了我的介绍，你也喜欢上可爱的小黄雀了吗?

My home have a lovely and naughty little white dog, its name is small white.

The small white to sleep. A noon, it will find a warm place, carefree played a big sleep, no matter what you call it, call it, its like not to hear, in the left ear, right ear out, dont ignore you.

Once in it when sleeping, I secretly hid the its food, it woke up, cant find my dinner, it is like a cat on hot bricks, like boiled dumplings, worried, "wang wang" barked, seems to shout "things I? Im not hungry!"

Suddenly, it triumphantly walked to come over to see me, like Sherlock Holmes, seemed to have answers, eyeing up and looked at me and after a while, quickly ran up and grabbed my trousers, tried to pull back, I also dont be afraid, go forward hard, alas, because of the small white teeth are sharp, so I was it to pull over.

Small white repeatedly "begged" me, his eyes reveal anxiously look, Im helpless, gave it the food into the cupboard.

Small white immediately as found the family dog, mingled, as if in said "thank you, master!"

How, this is the interesting thing between I with small white!

我家有一只既可爱又淘气的小白狗，它叫小白。

小白贪睡极了。一到中午，它就会找个暖和的地方，无忧无虑地睡起了大觉，不管你怎么叫它，喊它，它都像没听见似的，左耳朵进，右耳朵出，一点也不理睬你。

有一次，在它睡觉时，我偷偷地把它的食物藏了起来，它醒时，找不到了美餐，简直是像热锅上的蚂蚁，又像沸腾了的饺子，心急如焚，“汪汪”地叫个不停，似乎是在喊“我的事物呢?我饿得不行了!”

忽然，它看见我得意洋洋地走了过来，像福尔摩斯一样，似乎有了答案，便虎视眈眈地看着我，过了一会儿，迅速地跑过来，咬住了我的裤子，拼命地往后拽，我也不干示弱，使劲地往前走，唉，由于小白的牙齿锋利，所以我被它拉了过去。

小白再三“恳求”我，眼睛里露出了焦急地神情，我无可奈何，把藏在柜子里的食物给了它。

小白顿时像找到了家的小狗一般，悲喜交集，好象在说“谢谢你，好主人!”

怎么样，这就是我和小白之间有趣的事!

每年四月的第二周，是上海四鸟周。其实，我们不仅仅要保护鸟类，还应当保护野生动物，保护环境!

截止目前，上海分布有陆生野生动物四百八十余种：鸟类三百九十七种，兽类四十二种，两栖类十四种和爬行类三十六种。野生动物的数量正在日益减少!动物们是人类的朋友，是社会的财富，我们应当保护好它们!

动物是人类的朋友，植物是大自然的天然屏障;谈水是我们的生命之泉;而环境则是大自然赐给我们的宝贵财富!我简直不能想象没有动物、植物、淡水和环境的生活是什么样儿的!人们总是把“环保”这个词挂在嘴边，但始终没有采取行动!

大自然已经向我们人类发出了危险的警告，如果再不保护环境的话，是会遭到大自然的报复的。为了创造美好的环境，我们要珍惜大自然的每一份礼物，从自己做起，从小事做起，保护有限的自然之源，保护人类赖以生存的环境!

愿我们的生活更加美好!

我们的身边，经常看到伤害动物的行为，那些残忍血腥的行为让我们沉痛不已。保护动物，人人有责，希望每个人都能够做到，还动物们一个幸福和谐的家园，不要让人类成为它们心里的噩梦。

从前，有一个一年级的小学生小明，他的父亲天天到外面去打猎，没时间管他的学习。因此，他的成绩一直都不好。每天晚上，他的父亲都会捕来几只动物。他的父亲这样残杀动物，小明很伤心。“爸爸，不要再杀动物了，您知道杀动物是一件多么严重的事吗？这样会破坏生物链的，到头来，受损的还是我们呀！”小明说。他的爸爸严厉的回答说“你这么小懂什么？有时间就好好弄弄你的学习成绩吧！如果不打猎，靠什么吃饭？怎么供你上学？”小明说“那我好好学习，每次都得奖学金，你是不是就不打猎了？”“对，只要你的奖学金，我就不打猎”从此，小明就天天都努力学习。果然，在初中的时候学校答应只要他考试得第一名的时候就会给他奖学金。他的父亲也信守诺言，再也不打猎了。

就连一个一年级的小学生都懂的道理，难道那么多的猎人就想不清吗？你们有没有想过，假如你是一只动物，人类无缘无故的就把你杀了，你会愿意吗？肯定是千万个不愿意。俗话说得好“己所不欲，勿施于人。”你自己都不愿意，那动物们会愿意吗？就因为捕猎，现在都有多少种动物灭绝了，你们知道吗？已经800种了，这个数字看起来是不大，但是把每种动物的数量加起来，你们知道是多少吗？你们算过吗？破坏生物链，对人类一点好处都没有。

动物是大自然留给人类的无价之宝，所有的动物都是人类的好朋友，为什么就不能和睦的相处在同一个家园里呢？他们的生存与我们的生存，有着密切的关系。

保护动物，人人有责，这不是一句口号，而应该是一种行动。让我们一起保护动物，不要让它们再受到伤害了！

Everybody likes a small animal! Such as dogs, cats, turtles and so on. My home have a pet dog. He is a little yellow, his whole body is yellow. He has a pair of watery big eyes. Yellow is a little male dog. When he grow up, can help us tube of the house.

One day, the little yellow swept away.com by the bad guys to catch, I was so sad. I want to, I later cant play with you, a little yellow. A few days later, huang came back again, I dont mention how happy heart.

Huang, you are my good friend, bring me a lot of fun. I really like you.

The Marine life environment is a complex system including seawater, sea water content and suspension, seabed sediment and Marine life.The abundant biological resources, mineral resources, chemical resources and power resources of the sea are the indispensable resources of human beings, which are closely related to the survival and development of human beings.

The main objective of Marine conservation is to protect Marine life resources so that they are not depleted for sustainable use.Special priority should be given to protecting Marine life that is valuable and endangered.According to the relevant departments of the investigation, due to overfishing, accidental killing of non-target to allow hunting of Marine, coastal tidal flats in the engineering construction, mangrove deforestation, widespread Marine pollution, at least 25 in the worlds most valuable fisheries resources exhausted, whales, turtles, manatees and many other Marine animals are in danger of extinction.With the expansion of Marine development, the potential for greater damage to Marine biological resources is expected.

Marine conservation of the first task to stop the excessive use of Marine biological resources, secondly we must protect Marine habitats or niches, especially their migratory, spawning, feeding, avoiding DiHai coast, beaches, estuaries, coral reefs, to prevent the heavy metals and pesticides, oil, organic matter and eutrophication of nutrients, such as pollution of the sea.To maintain the renewable capacity of Marine biological resources and the natural purification capacity of seawater, maintain the balance of Marine ecology and ensure the sustainable development and utilization of the sea.

今天早晨，阳光明媚，万里无云，我的几个伙伴约我去野外玩。

郊外的景色绚丽多彩。各种各样的野花争奇斗艳，欣然怒放。青青的草地踩上去软软的，嫩绿的草叶上撒满了晶莹的露珠，在太阳公公的照耀下，显得格外刺眼。树林里，树木高大挺拔，翠绿的叶子挂满了枝头，郁郁葱葱的。忽然，我们听到了灰雀那婉转的叫声，我们四处寻找，终于在一颗树枝上看到了它，这只灰雀真可爱，两只眼睛炯炯有神，胸脯长着深红色的羽毛，尾巴一翘一翘的。他看到我们过来，一下飞到另一颗树上去了。小伙伴看见了小灰雀，赶忙拿出弹弓准备攻击它。我一看急了：小鸟是人类的好朋友，我们怎么可以伤害它呢？我连忙阻止小伙伴，说：“大家看，小鸟在自由自在地飞来飞去多开心呀，我们还是不要伤害它吧。”小伙伴听了，惭愧地放下弹弓，并低下了头。

关心和爱护小动物是我们每个人的责任和义务，因为，动物和我们人类一样，都是地球上的居民

尊敬的广大市民朋友：

“十八大”报告明确提出建设美丽中国的新构想，把生态文明建设放在突出地位，凸显了人与自然、人与社会和谐共生的重要性。大家知道，我们生活在一个庞大的生态系统中，许许多多的生物组成了我们周围的生态系统，野生动物就是其中的重要组成部分，是人类的朋友，保护发展和合理利用野生动物资源，对改善自然环境，促进人与自然的和谐，保持生物多样性，维护生态平衡，建设美丽中国有着重要意义。近年来由于人类不加限制的开发利用，导致了大量物种灭绝，资源种类减少，生态环境退化，人类生存环境日趋恶劣。为了缓解人与自然的矛盾，顺应自然发展规律，我们必须行动起来，从我做起，从现在做起，伸出我们的双手，献出我们的爱心，以实际行动保护和拯救野生动物，建设好美丽家园、美丽中国。

每年5月是野生动物保护宣传月。每年5月3日-5月8日是爱鸟周。

阜康市林业局是我市野生动物资源保护管理的职能部门，长期以来在宣传普及野保知识及法律法规和查处野保案件方面做了大量工作，市内野生动物生存、发展环境得以改善，野生动物物种逐年增多。但目前社会对保护野生动物的认识不足，滥捕、滥猎、滥食野生动物时有发生，保护野生动物的氛围亟待加强。因此我们呼吁全体市民行动起来，积极参与支持野生动物保护，为此我们提出如下倡议：

一、 全民动员，奉献爱心，保护和珍爱野生动物。

二、 不非法猎捕、杀害野生动物;

三、 不在集贸市场和其他场所非法销售野生动物及产品;

四、 餐饮行业不将野生动物及产品作为菜肴进行销售、广告，餐馆的名称不以“野味”字样冠名;

五、 客货承运业主自觉拒运野生动物及产品;

六、 广大市民自觉拒吃野生动物及其产品;

七、 广大市民积极举报非法捕杀、贩卖、食用、运输野生动物及产品的行为。

星期日早上一家人刚刚吃完饭，爸爸说：“儿子咱们去钓鱼吧。”儿子回答道：“小鱼也是一条生命呀，我怎么能伤害他呢？”“没事儿，世界上的鱼，到处都是伤害一条而已。”爸爸说着。儿子拿爸爸没有办法，只好跟着爸爸去钓鱼。

爸爸和儿子来到河边，爸爸坐在床头，嘴里叼了根烟，闭上眼睛悠闲地坐在船头等鱼儿上钩，而儿子呢，非常着急，他一定要想一个办法阻止爸爸伤害小鱼儿，儿子眼珠子咕噜一转，想出了一个办法来，他掏出一张纸拿起笔，来写信。

爸爸仍然在等待儿子的信，写完了，他马上跳下了河，游到鱼钩旁，把信从脖子上摘下来，儿子眼看鱼儿就要被爸爸钓上来，他手忙脚乱地把信挂上去，儿子把鱼钩拽了一下，又以迅雷不及掩耳之速游了上来，爸爸感觉到鱼钩往下沉了一下，立刻睁大眼睛喊道：“儿子，咱们有鱼吃了，猜猜，你长什么样呢？”儿子在心里头哈哈大笑。可爸爸钓上来发现，是一张纸。爸爸把纸条展开上面写着，今天我们不，想来，敬礼，鱼儿！

爸爸很快就认出这是儿子的字迹，爸爸才明白儿子的用意，从此爸爸再也不伤害动物了，儿子高兴极了。

I have a very beautiful cat.Its colour is white or yellow .its name isHaahua .Ithink it is my favourite cat .she likes sleep playing with the bell .she love ratting meat ,Though it is a kind of animals ,I treat it as my friend .sometime I give her some fish or pork to eat .When she sees the fool she begin to cry miao miao .As if she is very hungry and thirsty .Wherever I amwalk she follws me .

How happy I am !How nice my friend is !I love her more and more .