2015年中考提高英语作文写作技巧【实用3篇】 作文（经典20篇）

游记就是我们一起组织去玩了以后回来老师布置写一篇游记的作文，大部分是这样的，那么我们写游记作文主要抓住那些关键呢。那我们同学在游览之后，怎样把它写下来，而且有充实的、活泼的内容呢?下文是小编整理的相关内容，欢迎阅读参考!

一、按游览的顺序描写景物。

写作时，要在认真观察和记忆游览的景物的基础上，按照见到景物的次序，来所写看到的景物。这样才能做到条理清楚、自然、明白，不致于杂乱。观察景物，通常有两种方法。一种就是定点观察。如站在公园某一角，对公园进行由远及近的观察。又如我们登上塔顶，从东南西北四个东南西北四个方向对塔下景物进行观察。二就是移动观察，它又叫移步换位法。就是随着脚步的移动变换位置，一处一处地进行观察。选好了观察点，就是确定好了写的顺序。如课文《参观人民大会堂》，按参观的顺序，依次写了五处的景物。先写大会堂正门的国徽和柱子，其次写中央大厅的天花板和地面，接着写大礼堂，然后写宴会厅和会议厅。这样，就有条理有重点地写下了在大会堂所看到的景物。

二、抓住游览重点，详写过程。

一次参观游览活动，看到的景物很多，我们不能记“流水帐”。要把看到的景物中印象较深的写下来，其余地可以写得简略些。我们在一边参观游览，一边要抓住景物的特点，进行仔细观察。比方说，我们要写游览看到的景物为主的记叙文，写作的重点就是把看到的景物重点写下来。对于我们看到的特别好的景物，我们要进行具体地描写，突出重点。对于重点的景物，要注意详细描写出它们的位置、大小、动态、静态、颜色等。如我们写“菊花”，颜色就有“红的如枫叶、白的如冰霜、黄的如麦穗”等等，菊花的形状就有像 “小姑娘的卷发，毛茸茸的小鸡，绣球”等等。我们要把过程写详细、具体，做到主次分明，详略得当，写出来的文章才能突出重点，清楚明白，才能写出游览的意义，才有教育意义。

三、略写前后，情、理、景相结合。

我们在写游览记时，应把开头和结尾写得简略些。开头要交待清楚时间、地点和人物。如《游善卷洞》的开头“我的故乡江苏宜兴有一处著名的游览胜地——善卷洞”。结尾应用议论或抒情的方式写下自己的感受。如《天然动物园漫游记》的结尾写道 “‘哈哈……’我们在欢笑声中结束了这次愉快的野游。朱库米天然动物园行的乐趣是无穷的，无怪乎世界各地前去游览的人络绎不绝”。这样，写的文章有头有尾，读起来给人一个完整的印象。我们要把感情融化于景物中，写出真意。写作时，我们要倾注自己的思想感情。

还有，我们在写景的同时，或探索人生真谛，或谈论思想问题，治学精神，使读者在领略自然风景的同时，受到启迪和教育。

[游记的写作有什么技巧

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

学生不愿写作文很大程度是由于学生对于作文有一种畏惧、厌烦的心理，认为作文是一项高难度的思维创造，认为没有什么可以写的，不知该怎样写。教师在指导学生作文时，要从各方面入手，消除学生对作文的畏惧感，激发学生的写作兴趣，提高学生的写作能力。

一、扩大阅读，丰富知识，为学生作文创作奠定基础。

作文是各种知识的综合运用，没有丰厚的知识，很难写出思想深刻、内容丰富、新颖别致的好作文来，所以教师要教育学生，要多读课外书籍，特别是那些名著，甚至自然科学知识，也要了解一些。正如培根所说“读史使人明智，读诗使人巧意，数学使人精微，博物使人深沉，伦理使人庄重，逻辑与修辞使人善辩”。为了更好地引导学生阅读和作文，教师可组织一些读书班会或专题沙龙，让学生交流读书心得体会，或以讲故事、开辩论会等形式来锻炼口才。再通过办手抄报、校园黑板报等形式提高学生的书面作文水平。学生在广泛阅读中，从古今中外名著和大量诗文中汲取了健康的思想和艺术精髓，同时也积累了大量词汇和第二手作文材料。通过阅读，学生视野开阔了，知识丰富了，思维活跃了，再不会为“无米之炊”而苦恼。

二、感悟自然，认真观察，培养学生的观察能力。

作文教学要激发学生的情感，启迪学生的悟性。在感悟中培养学生的观察能力，大自然中的一草一木、社会生活中的平凡小事，都可引发我们的思考。可是，面对美丽的大自然孩子们却无动于衷，或虽感到美，却又写不出来。生活中每天发生的事情非常多，孩子们往往求大，忽略了身边值得关注的小事，所以，也造成了无话可说，无事可写的情况。对农村学生来说，农村的风景优美，乡土气息浓厚，美丽的大自然又孕育了千姿百态的动植物。这既是作文教学的直观教具，又为作文教学提供了取之不尽、用之不竭的写作素材。教师利用这种优势，引导学生仔细观察，使他们“见景生情”。把这种情景教育引进小学作文教学中，会收到事半功倍的效果。如写一写家中养的鸡，教师可引导学生观察鸡吃食、鸡打架、鸡下蛋等等，帮他们列出观察项目，学生就会有目的的观察，写作时就不会无话可说了。让学生每天回忆发生的事，说一说、议一议，久而久之，学生就知道了什么事是有价值的了。事不在大小，在事情的内容。指导学生写自己熟悉而又真实的生活，而不是写那些“虚构生活”，让学生知道，说真话、写事实、叙真情就是作文。

三、激活思维，标新立异，培养学生的想象能力。

作文教学的每一个环节都离不开想象力。用想象力激发学生的写作兴趣。根据儿童少年的生理心理的特点，他们想象逐步从无意想象发展到有意想象，想象的兴趣浓厚。现在的世界是多彩的世界，小学生在做作文时应该多发挥想象力，来描绘未来的世界和多彩的生活。让学生张开想象的翅膀，任思维驰骋，想象力应该贯穿整个作文教学之中，没有想象力，学生作文思路就会闭塞，内容空洞，立意不新。所以学生的写作欲望靠想象来燃烧，观察力靠想象来培养，立意新颖靠想象去创造，思路靠想象去拓展，人物形象靠想象去塑造，语言的色调靠想象去渲染。

总而言之，作文教学要努力走进学生的内心世界，贴近现实生活，以人为本，趣字当头，重视写作灵性的启发和培植，在实践中求发展求提高。罗伯特·艾文斯认为，只要学生把作文看成是一种“自我放纵”，不受条条框框的限制，看到什么、听到什么、想到什么就如实地写什么。熟练地掌握写作技巧就不是什么难事了。

【导读】：散文诗兼有诗与散文特点的一种现代抒情文学体裁。它融合了诗的表现性和散文描写性的某些特点。从本质上看，它属于诗，有诗的情绪和幻想，给读者美和想象，但内容上保留了有诗意的散文性细节。

现在看见很多人喜欢和读散文诗，但是有的人对散文诗的基本认识还不是很清楚，所以造成了有些不知所措的感觉。现就仅仅个人来谈谈散文诗的写作和欣赏的方法。

散文诗兼有诗与散文特点的一种现代抒情文学体裁。它融合了诗的表现性和散文描写性的某些特点。从本质上看，它属于诗，有诗的情绪和幻想，给读者美和想象，但内容上保留了有诗意的散文性细节；从形式上看，它有散文的外观，不像诗歌那样分行和押韵，但不乏内在的音乐美和节奏感。散文诗一般表现作者基于社会和人生背景的小感触，注意描写客观生活触发下思想情感的波动和片断。这些特点，决定了它题材上的丰富性，也决定了它的形式短小灵活。

散文诗是一种近代文体，是适应近、现代社会人们敏感多思、复杂缜密等心理特征而发展起来的。虽然中国1000多年前就有类似散文诗的作品，欧洲在16、17世纪不少作家就写过很有诗意的散文，但作为一种独立的文学样式流行起来是在19世纪中叶以后。第一个正式用小散文诗这个名词，和有意采用这种体裁的是法国诗人波特莱尔。他认为散文诗足以适应灵魂的抒情性的动汤，梦幻的波动和意识的惊跳。在中国新文学中，散文诗是一个引进的文学品种。1915年2卷7期的中华小说界刊登的用文言翻译的屠格涅夫的四章散文诗(当时列入小说栏，译者刘半农)，是外国散文诗在中国的最早译介。1918年4卷5期的新青年杂志，发表了刘半农翻译的印度作品我行雪中的译文，文末所附的说明指出它是一篇结构精密的散文诗。散文诗这一名称从此开始在中国报刊上出现。对於这一文体的性质和特点，文学旬刊在1922年曾有过理论探讨，西谛(郑振铎)、滕固、王平陵等人都发表了意见。

关于散文诗的定义

一、散文诗，必须有两个特点：

其一，散文诗是诗和文的渗透、交叉产生的新文体。

散文诗是散文与诗嫁接出来的品种，这是没有疑问的。散文诗具有诗与散文的两栖特征，散文诗既吸收诗表现主观心灵和情绪的功能，也吸收了散文自由、随便抒怀状物的功能，并使两者浑然一体，形成了自己的独特性。可以说不熟悉诗与散文这两种文体，就很难创作散文诗。但是散文诗究竟是一种新的文体，还是如有人说的：散文诗是散文的诗和诗的散文？关键要看散文诗是否具有独特的艺术特征，或者说散文诗区别与诗和抒情散文的艺术特征是什么。

其二，散文诗有其独特的审视人生方式，即运用比较自由的形式抒写心灵或情绪及其波动。从总体上看来，散文诗是抒写心灵或主观情绪的文体。

波德莱尔是散文诗的最初创造者之一。他说过：当我们人类野心滋长的时候，谁没有梦想到那散文诗的神秘，－－声律和谐，而没有节奏，那立意的精辟辞章的跌宕，足以应付那心灵的情绪、思想的起伏和知觉的变幻。。他还说：散文诗这种形式，足以适应灵魂的抒情性的动荡、梦幻的波动和意识的惊跳。动荡、波动、惊跳，这说出了散文诗的主要艺术特征。

要说明上述两点，必须进一步区别散文诗与诗、与散文（尤其是抒情散文）的不同之处。

二、散文诗与诗、与散文（尤其是抒情散文）的区别。比如结构、语体、节奏等方面的不同。

（1）散文诗与抒情诗的区别。抒情诗由于要讲究句式的整齐或大体整齐和音乐韵律，因此，即便是自由体的抒情诗，在表现心灵或情绪时也不能不受到较多限制。正是为了突破限制，更舒卷自如地写出心灵的真实状态，于是才有散文诗这一文体的诞生。

散文诗与诗歌的不同之处在于散文诗经常运用描述和议论的表现手段。

与诗相比，散文诗没有诗的韵脚、节奏、音节、行数、排列，即没有诗歌的外形式的羁绊。散文诗的形式至少有如下几种：散文的形式，散文与诗交错排列的形式，即整段散的文字与单句(诗句)的交错。这是抒情诗不可能有的自由自在的形式。

（2）散文诗和抒情散文同是抒情文体，但散文诗独特的艺术特征是它的动荡、波动、惊跳。

承认散文诗是抒写心灵或情绪及其波动的文体，这与抒情散文的界限也就不难区分了。抒情散文总是离不开纪实，更不用说那些以记叙真人真事为主的叙事散文了。而散文诗几乎没有原原本本地记录真实人物和真实事件的。即使我们称为纪实的散文诗，究其实也是抒写的内心对现实生活的印象，不过这印象很少变形很少对现实生活作想象式的反映罢了。

在结构上，有人说，诗是以线抒写生活，散文是以面反映生活，散文诗是以点折射生活。散文大都有时空长度，都有线索；散文诗无需线索，篇幅较短，常常是作者情感燃烧的那一点辐射开来，而内在情绪则形成环环相扣的情感冲击波，冲动读者的心弦，进入诗的境界。

在语体上，散文诗的语言是抒情性的想象的语言，散文的语言是叙事性的现实的语言。散文诗的语言具有散文语言无法比拟的弹性美、丰富性和不确定性，情感含量和美感含量都比较大。散文为文，语言要求简洁洒脱，更多一些娓娓而谈，写清作者情之所系的来龙去脉，抒情也更细腻，句与句之间、段与段之间衔接较紧密。散文诗为诗，语言要求浓缩、跳跃，一般是跳跃式地联结意象，句与句之间，尤其是段与段之间，往往是似断实连的关系，这就留下较多的可供读者想象的空白美。

因此，散文诗既不是散文的诗，也不是诗的散文，它是具有完整性、特殊性、独立性的文体形式。

关于散文诗的结构

散文诗结构的基本方式大体有纪实性（直抒式）、想象式、哲理式和象征式四大类。

1、纪实性（直抒式），即意在象表，比较外露。比如写景抒情、叙事抒情等。或者说是心灵感受外部世界基本上是原原本本的，是什么就在心灵投影什么，很少变化。直抒胸臆的散文诗通常用此种方式。

小升初的脚步越来越近，要知道小升初是每位家长和孩子人生的转折，小编收集了小升初记事作文写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

一、记事中要围绕中心，抓住重点，不要面面俱到。重点部分(一般指事情发展高潮处)要详写，写具体，写详尽，给读者以深刻的印象。

二、写事不能离不开写人。同此在记事过程中，一定要把人物的语言、神态、动作、心理活动等写细致，写逼真，这样才能表达出人物的思想品质，才能更好地表达这件事所包含的意义，即文章的中心思想。

三、必须把事情发生的环境写清楚。因为任何事情总是在一定的环境中发生、发展的。环境写好了，写出特点来，还能渲染气氛，表达感情，使文章更生动。

四、要交代清楚时间、地点、人物、事件。让读者明白文章写的是什么人，在什么时候，什么地方发生了怎样的事。

五、找出事件闪光点。如果根据题目的要求选定了某件事，你就要对这件事进行认真的回忆，并仔细琢磨，反复思考，挖掘出这件事中含有的生活道理，或找出它闪光的地方。

六、小升初学生必须把事情发生的环境写清楚。因为任何事情总是在一定的环境中发生、发展的。环境写好了，写出特点来，还能渲染气氛，表达感情，使文章更生动。

1.开阔视野，多方面观察、感受生活

多方面观察和感受生活的意义在于：首先，可以从生活中获得丰富的写作材料。其次，可以使文章获得较深刻的思想意义。

多方面观察和感受生活，首先要尽量多参加社会活动，在生活中观察身边的各种人、事物和景物，把它们的面貌和特征装进大脑这个“仓库”。其次要留心身边的人和事，注意多听多看。

2.广泛阅读文章

广泛阅读为什么如此重要呢?一方面，它可以弥补我们体验生活的不足，使我们间接地获得许多生活材料及对生活的感受;另一方面，可以使我们博采众长，多方面地学习别人的写作方法和技巧。

广泛阅读应该采取正确的方法。在这方面，前人有过不少好的经验。比如粗读和精读相结合，就是一个行之有效的方法。

粗读，就是拣各种范文进行阅读，读的时候不必做详细分析。对那些好的文章，还需要精读。精读，不但要认真思考，读后还应该把这些记在本子上。

3.要多练笔

多练笔，可以加快从学习写作知识到会用写作知识的过程，可以说这是提高写作水平最关键的一环。

初学写作的同学，开始可先写一段表达思想感情的话，练习所有的话都围绕着中心来讲。接下来，看看表现中心的几部分安排得是否合理，学习掌握结构方面的知识。然后，再看这几部分哪些地方需要详写，哪些地方需要略写，学习写人、记事、描写景物方面的知识。最后，再考虑用词造句，并进行相应的练习。有了一定写作知识的同学，在练习写作时，也应该始终把思想感情放在第一位来进行。

2005年英语考纲有重大变化，其中之一就是作文考查的变化。新增加一篇小作文，使作文考查由一篇变为两篇，而原来的大作文的字数也由“不少于200字”调整为“150至200字”，满分20分。新增的作文是一篇100字左右的应用性短文，文体包括有信件、便笺、备忘录等，满分10分。既然是新增题型，就不会太难，但不好预测文体，这就要求考生复习时力求面面俱到，掌握写作规律及注意事项，尤其是对常见的应用文体如书信等

大作文的写作一般会给考生写作提纲，或图表，图画，或图文并茂。命题方式虽然多样，但题目涉及面往往是考生比较熟悉的内容，目的是测定考生语言的实际应用能力。要求表达清楚，文字连贯，中心突出，内容丰富，句式多变，句子结构和用词正确。

语言的应用能力不可能一蹴而就，必须厚积薄发，必须经过长期的实践锻炼。在提高英语写作能力方面，我觉得：一是要背大量的优秀范文，整段整篇地背，并转换为自己的语言，写作时自己能随心所欲支配。考试时避免套用以前死记硬背的几个范文，把一些不达意的词堆积在一起，没有统一性，无法很好地表现主题；二是要多动手。包括对背过的文章进行词语替换，句式转换，句子重组等，以及对某一主题展开写作。多动手才能提高笔下功夫，才能保证在考场上顺利写作。可以说背诵范文是培养语感，积累素材，掌握写作方法，动手写作是实践，是最终目的，这两者结合起来，就是“理论联系了实际”。另外，背诵范文应有针对性，写作训练也是一样，在训练中要掌握每一类型作文的写作规律，根据其每一类作文的写作特点——如提纲式作文就要求考生根据提纲提示的思路和规定的要点展开段落——全面训练，但不要带有押题的心理，靠背几篇范文就能应付考试的心态是不可取的。

下面说一下英语写作过程中的注意事项

一、认真审题

作文第一步是仔细审题，考生要仔细阅读试题要求及相关信息，如图表，图画，数字等，准确把握出题者意图。考研作文忌信手掂来，提笔就写，根本不审题，想到哪儿就写到哪儿，或完全凭自己想象编故事，置考试要求于不顾， “下笔千言，离题万里”。比如1998是一幅卡通画，老母鸡申明外加一首打油诗，讽刺一些企业把该尽职之事作为推销产品的承诺。如果考生说老母鸡很可爱，但爱自夸，然后说自己某个同学也爱自夸，这就偏离主题。2000年的作文“A Brief Histiry of World Commercial Fishing ”.它给出了两张图，从1900年的渔船和鱼量之比到1995年的渔船和鱼量之比的变化谈如何保护渔业资源，应从商业性滥捕鱼这一主题展开话题，有的考生却大谈环境污染。这就偏离了主题，因为题中自始自终都没有谈到环境污染问题。

有的同学没有审题习惯，或担心时间不够草草审题，最后发现文不对题，草草收场，这就影响了英语成绩，同时也会影响后两门考试的考试心情。

二、列出提纲

考试规定的时间是很有限的，所以不能花太多时间准备一个详细的提纲，但关键词提纲或粗略提纲还是非常有必要的。对原始材料分析归纳后要形成一个基本的框架。文章打算分几段写，每段大概怎样写，自数控制在多少，开头段落是道破主题，点名要旨，引人入胜还是先给出主题一般的背景情况和对主题进行浓缩的陈述呢，中间段落和结尾有怎样写呢。这些都要心中有数。有的考生习惯用汉语构思文章，逐句翻译提纲，当碰到某个词卡住时就翻译不下去，僵在那里。要注意列提纲是为了更好更全面的表达主题。主题的表达可有多种形式，不一定非要寻找一个特定的词或句子。考试时考生要充分调动大脑，灵活运用以前所学知识。

三、开始写作

一篇文章往往由四部分组成，标题(title)，首段(opening paragraph),主体(body paragraph),结尾段( concluding paragraph)。标题要新颖，能引起读者兴趣，首段的内容根据文章的体裁而变化，比如议论文可以从一种现象，一种观点出发引出作者的观点。记叙文往往交代人物和故事背景。主体是文章的主要部分，通过合适的语篇模式表达一定的观点，考生要围绕中心按一定顺序分层次有重点的展开叙述，描写，议论。结尾段是对全文的总结，论点上要与前面的叙述一致和统一。写作时要注意以下几点。

1、要统一，连贯。

选择那些最能体现中心思想最具代表性的材料，这些材料要共同表达一致的信息。选材时切忌胡子眉毛一把抓。词语堆积，不伦不类。前后及段落之间在逻辑关系上要紧密衔接，不能把没有任何逻辑关系的词放在一起。可以用恰当的关联词把思想连贯的表达出来。

2、用词准确，语法正确

考试时要特别注意语法，此语，语气，标点符号等，为了避免太多单词拼写错误，语法错误，不要为了追求词语的华丽而堆积一些自己也没把握的单词，不要刻意追求长句而写一些自己不知对错的有多个从句组成的长句。考试时最好选择自己最有把握的词汇，短语，句式。

3、足够字数，卷面整洁

绝对不能字数不够，即使一句话颠来倒去说也要凑够字数。字数不够，即使写的非常精彩，也不能拿高分。

四、修改

英语写作时考生由于仓促，紧张等原因，很容易犯一些简单的，一眼就能发现的错误。所以考生一定要留出几分钟时间用于修改。不要大幅度进行修改，更不要因为修改破坏卷面整洁，影响阅卷老师心情。修改时可以从以下几点进行

1、语法

包括时态是否一致，主谓是否一致，名词单复数是否对应，被动主动语态是否错用等

2、词汇

包括连接上下句或段落的关联词，习惯用语，固定搭配，词类混淆，误用及物不及物动词等。

3、拼写和标点符号

学生写好观后感和读后感，历来是一件较辣手的问题。要写好感想，指导是关键。今天小编整理了|如何写好读后感的写作技巧，一起来了解下吧：

一、格式和写法

读后感通常有三种写法：

一种是缩写内容提纲，一种是写阅读后的体会感想，一种是摘录好的句子和段落。

题目可以用《×××读后感》，也可以用《读×××有感》。

二、要选择自己感受最深的东西去写，这是写好读后感的关键。

看完一本书或一篇文章，我们的感受可能很多，如果面面俱到像开杂货铺一样，把自己所有的感受都一股脑地写上去，什么都有一点，什么也不深不透，重点部分也像蜻蜓点水一样一擦而过，必然使文章平淡，不深刻。

所以写感受前要认真思考、分析，对自己的感想加以提炼，选择自己感受最深的去写。你可以抓住原作的中心思想写，也可以抓住文中自己感受最深的一个情节、一个人物、一句闪光的语言来写，最好是突出一点，深入挖掘，写出自己的真情实感，总之，感受越深，表达才能越真切，文章才能越感人。

三、要密切联系实际，这是读后感的重要内容。

写读后感的重点应是联系实际发表感想。我们所说的联系实际范围很广泛，可以联系个人实际，也可以联系社会实际，可以是历史教训，也可以是当前形势，可以是童年生活，也可以是班级或家庭状况。

四、要处理好“读”与“感”的关系，做到议论，叙述，抒情三结合。

读后感是议论性较强的读书笔记，要用切身体会，实践经验和生动的事例来阐明从“读”中悟出的道理。因此，读后感中既要写“读”，又要写“感”，既要叙述，又必须说理。叙述是议论的基础，议论又是叙述的深化，二者必须结合。   读后感以“感”为主。要适当地引用原文，当然引用不能太多，应以自己的语言为主。在表现方法上，可用夹叙夹议的写法，议论时应重于分析说理，事例不宜多，引用原文要简洁。在结构上，一般在开头概括式提示“读”，从中引出“感”，在着重抒写感受后，结尾又回扣“读”。

五、原文不要过多，要体现出一个“简”字。

六、要选择材料。

读是写的基础，只有读得认真仔细，才能深入理解文章内容，从而抓住重点，把握文章的思想感情，才能有所感受，有所体会；只有认真读书才能找到读感之间的联系点来，这个点就是文章的中心思想，就是文中点明中心思想的句子。对一篇作品，写体会时不能面面俱到，应写自己读后在思想上、行动上的变化，摘取其中的某一点做文章。

七，写读后感应以所读作品的内容简介开头，然后，再写体会。

原文内容往往用3～4句话概括为宜。结尾也大多再回到所读的作品上来。要把重点放在“感”字上，切记要联系自己的生活实际。

八，记住两点写读后感：①写读后感绝不是对原文的抄录或简单地复述，不能脱离原文任意发挥，应以写“体会”为主。②要写得有真情实感。应是发自内心深处的感受，绝非“检讨书”或“保证书”。

读后感范文：读《去年的树》

《去年的树》这篇文章主要讲了一只小鸟和一颗大树是好朋友，冬天到了，小鸟离开大树，飞往南方。在飞往南方前，小鸟和大树做了一个约定，下一年的春天再回来给它唱歌。到了下年春天小鸟回来的时候。小鸟只看见树根立在那里。小鸟经过几十次对话终于找到了大树，可是已经被做成了火柴，小鸟对着用火柴点燃的灯火唱起了去年唱过的歌，这就是《去年的树》，是日本的作家美南吉写的。

（点评：这段话概括了课文《去年的树》的基本内容，也把作者介绍给大家。亮点在于比较完整地叙述了整个故事的发展，并把文章内容和作者放在最后介绍显得比较有特点。）

这个故事内容很丰富，让我难以忘记。从这个故事中，我明白了：人们要保护大自然和树，也要少点砍伐树木，而且还要遵守承诺。讲完了上面的内容，现在我来说一说我以前的一件事。记得那一天，体育老师让我们去自由活动，那时我和一个很好的同学约好在一个地方集合，我等了很久那个同学都没有来，我就去找他。我终于在一群人里面找到了他，谁知道他在和一些人在玩着什么游戏。我看到了就把他拉到我和他约好的地方，我就问他，他马上回答我，因为我已经忘记了，所以我才和他们一起玩的，对不起了，我下次一定会好好记住的。我听到这句话就跟他说，我可以给你一次机会，但下次一定要记住，我们答应别人的事情一定要做到。

（点评：这段话既说明了这个故事给作者带来的感受，也结合实际中自己的真实经历来叙述，显得真实和有感情。）

生活中，我们一定要遵守诺言，一定要做一个遵守诺言的人，才能赢得大家的尊重。

（点评：最后一段比较简洁，但是结合上文的案例，总结出了一个文章中心。）

想成为下一个海明威吗?或许只是想在校刊有自己的豆腐块，让自己的博客富有动人文字?小编收集了10条技巧提高你的写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

阅读优秀的作品：这是显而易见的，但立竿见影的方法。如果你不读更多的好作品，你就不知道如何写出更好的作品。优秀的作家都是从阅读别人的佳作开始，接着开始模仿，最后超越他们，形成自己的风格。尽可能的多读名著，在看内容的时候，更要留意文章的问题和写作的技巧。

随时随地记下你的灵感：随身带一本小笔记本(纳博科夫身上装满了小卡片)，当你对你构思的小说，文章，或是小说里的人物有什么灵感的时候，马上记下来。当你听别人谈话时的只言片语而所有顿悟时，或看到一段散文诗或是一句歌词让你很感动时，都可以马上当他们记下来。灵感总是转瞬即逝，你及时的记录下来，便可以成为你写作的素材。我的习惯是，为我的博客要写的文章列一个清单，不断的补充它。

随便涂鸦：面对整张的白纸，整版的白屏，无从开始，肯定恐怖。你会想：我还是看看邮件或是小憩一会了吧!先生，千万别这样。马上开始写，马上打字，你写什么没有关系，只是让我听到你敲键盘的声音吧。只要你开始写了，什么都好办了。像我的话，我喜欢先敲上我的名字和文章的标题，这应该不难吧，然后再慢慢的展开情节，全身心地融入进去…关键是：开始可以随便写写，随便涂鸦，但是尽快开始写正文。

先计划，再写： 这好像和“随便涂鸦”有些矛盾，实际上不是这样。在坐下来正式写之前，先做个计划或是脑子里先预演一下，这是非常管用的办法。每天跑步的时候想想要写的东西，或是散步的时间来个头脑风暴;然后把想到的记下来，做一个扼要的提纲;等真正准备好开始写了，可以很快的展开，因为思路和想法都有了。这里，有一个构思小说的三部曲，可以参考这个：Snowflake Method.

创新： 你需要模仿名家，这并不意味你要跟他们写得一模一样。你可以试试新的写法，从这里学一点，从那里学一点。渐渐地，你就会有了自己的风格，自己的文体，自己的思路。试试一些不一样的表达，或创造一些与众不同的表达方式，每一方法你都可以尝试，看看它到底怎么样，不好就不用呗。

修改： 你开始构思你的文字，然后试着写，让故事情节展开，最后你需要回过头再看看你都写了什么。这点很重要，很多写手一旦写好就不想修改，已经费时费力地写好了，还要再花时间修改，实在是一件吃力不讨好的活。但如果你想写得更好，你就要学会如何修改。好的作品是经过反复的推敲和修改而成的，这会让你的作品从平庸中脱颖而出。看看你写的东东，不仅仅是那些拼写和语法错误，还有那些无意义的词，混乱的结构，和让人搞不懂的句子。修改的目标是：更清晰，更直接，更鲜活。

简明扼要： 这是你在修改的过程中，最重要的一件事情。一句句，一段段的修改，把无关主题的统统都删掉。一个短句比一段冗长的废话更具说服力，大白话比晦涩的专业术语更受欢迎。记得：简单就是力量。

获取别人的反馈： 闭门造车不会有任何进步，让别人读读你的文章给你回馈，最好有经验的作家和编辑。他们见多识广，会给你很中肯和有见地的建议。认真的听，即使是一些批评，也接受它，忠言逆耳，这样只会让你写得更好。

是骡子还是马，拉出来溜溜：就你而言，你需要让别人读到你的作品。你的作品不是你想谁看谁就看的，让所有的人都读到你的文章。你就要出版自己的书，发表自己的短篇小说和诗歌，给出版社供稿。如果你已经开始写博客了，恭喜你，这是一个好的开始。若现在还没有人浏览过，你就需要把它放到流量更大的博客服务网站上去，让读者给你留言，给你提出建议。所有的人都会看你写东西，也许刚开始时会是件伤脑筋的事情，但这是每一位作家成长的必由之路，马上发表你的文字吧。

好开头和结尾： 开头和结尾是文章的重点。特别是开头。如果你不能在故事的开始就吸引读者，那他们就很难有耐心把整篇文章读完。所以投入更多的时间去考虑怎么写好开头，读者一旦对你开头感兴趣，他们会想知道得更多...写好开头后，再弄一个精彩的结尾，这会让读者更加期待你的下一篇佳作。

Where possible, reduce the use of "which," "who" "that" "whom" "whether... or not" etc.

少用关系代词

学会运用关系代词是你学习英文过程中的一个重要的阶段。学会少用它们则表明你取得了更大的进步。在校对你的作品时，仔细检查一下所有的which’s, who’s that’s和whom’s是否必要。删除不必要的关系代词会使你的文章更精彩。

Example:

Unnecessary: It is a truth that is universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.

(用两个 that’s，读起来很别扭)

Better: It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.

-- Jane Austin

注：被动语态修饰的名词通常不须用关系代词。

Unnecessary: In 1970 India dedicated a nuclear power plant near Bombay, which was built with American assistance.

Improved: In 1970 India dedicated a nuclear power plant near Bombay, built with American assistance.

Unnecessary: During this period, Churchill spoke for a nation which was undivided and curiously happy, as it has never been in my lifetime, before or since.

Improved: During this period, Churchill spoke for a nation undivided and curiously happy, as it has never been in my lifetime, before or since.

Unnecessary: Justice theories have a long tradition, which goes back to Plato and Aristotle in the 5th century B.C.

Improved: Justice theories have a long tradition, going back to Plato and Aristotle in the 5th century B.C.

Unnecessary: Shirley Temple’s father blew nearly the entire $3 million that she made by tap dancing which made her famous in the movies.

Improved: Shirley Temple’s father blew nearly the entire $3 million she made tap dancing her way to fame in the movies.

Unnecessary: We told them they were the victims who deserved sympathy the most.

Improved: We told them they were the victims, most deserving of sympathy.

Unnecessary: Only a person who is oblivious* to the facts of modern life would doubt the need of vocational education today.

Better: Only a person oblivious to the facts of modern life would doubt the need of vocational education today.

Unnecessary: Not everyone in North America likes the taste of green tea, whether it contains caffeine or not.

Better: With or without caffeine, not everyone in North America likes the taste of green tea.

Unnecessary: Usually the Washington family married people who were socially better off than themselves, but the second marriage of George’s father was an exception.

Better: Usually the Washingtons married their social betters, but the second marriage of George’s father was an exception.

Unnecessary: In some instances, a letter can take ten days by air and six to eight weeks by ship to reach the person to whom the letter is addressed.

Better: In some instances, a letter can take ten days by air and six to eight weeks by ship to reach its intended receiver.

导语：作文一直是考试中最重要的一道题目，得作文者得天下，下面我们来看看作文加分技巧和攻略。

写人，免不了要描写人的动作，因为一个人的思想、品质、性格和作风，往往能通过行为动作来表现。如同学们学过的《金色的鱼钩》一课中，有这样一段描写老红军的话：“他坐在那里捧着搪瓷碗，嚼着几根草根和我们吃剩的鱼骨头，嚼了一会儿，就皱着眉头硬咽下去。”

这段话描写了红军老班长连续五个动作。用“坐、捧、嚼、皱、咽”五个准确的动词，写出了老班长在二万五千里长征途中，为照料小战友、日夜操劳、精神疲乏的神态。“捧”字，突出了老班长对那几根草根和“我们”吃剩的鱼骨头的珍惜：“嚼”、“皱”、“咽”三个动词，写出了草根和鱼骨头难以咽下以及老班长饥饿的程度。通过这些动作的描写，表现了红军老班长在艰苦的条件下，顽强抗争的坚毅性格和舍己为人的崇高品质。

怎样描写人物的动作?

(一)描写人物动作，最重要的是注意观察。

在日常生活中要格外留心，观察周围各种人形形色色的行为动作，特别要注意不同的人的动作特征，抓住特征仔细地反复地进行观察。

如下面例段：

1、小丽抿着嘴，弓着腰，蹑手蹑脚地，一步一步慢慢地靠近它。靠近了，靠近了，又见她悄悄地将右手伸向蝴蝶，张开的两个手指一合，夹住了粉蝶的翅膀。小丽高兴得又蹦又跳。

2、他弯着腰，篮球在他的手下前后左右不停地拍着，两眼溜溜地转动，寻找“突围”的机会。突然他加快了步伐，一会左拐，一会右拐，冲过了两层防线，来到篮下，一个虎跳，转身投篮，篮球在空中划了一条漂亮的弧线后，不偏不倚地落在筐内。

捉蝴蝶、打篮球，都是我们常见的活动，有的甚至是同学们亲自参加过的。但写起来却不具体。上述两段描写，由于作者观察仔细，把捉蝴蝶，打篮球的动作、神态写得栩栩如生。

(二)是要抓住最能突出人物性格、身份特点的动作描写。

请看下列例段：

1、他50多岁了。戴着一副高度近视眼镜。他战战兢兢取下眼镜，用衣服的下摆随手擦了擦镜片。“嗯嗯……”他刚要讲话，忽然想起了什么，手忙脚乱地在盘子里找了找，又匆匆往口袋里掏了掏，掏出了一盒火柴，这才放心地又“嗯嗯”两声，站直身子，用特别响亮的声音说：“现在开始看老师做实验!”

2、教室里打得乌烟瘴气。毛老师气咻咻地站在门口，他头上冒着热气，鼻子尖上缀着几颗亮晶晶的汗珠，眉毛怒气冲冲地向上挑着，嘴却向下咧着。看见我们，惊愕地眨了眨眼睛，脸上的肌肉一下子僵住了，纹丝不动，就像电影中的“定格”。我们几个也都像木头一样，钉在那里了。

3、老人的双手很灵巧。一个泥人在他手里诞生，只要几分钟。看他又拿起一团泥，先捏成圆形，再用手轻轻揉搓，使它变得柔软起来，光滑起来。接着，又在上面揉搓，渐渐分出了人的头、身和腿。他左手托住这个泥人，右手在头上面摆弄着，不一会儿，泥人戴上了一顶偏偏的帽子。

上述三段都抓住了最能突出人物特点的动作。

例一写的是一位高度近视的老教师。通过“用衣服的下摆擦镜片”、“手忙脚乱地在盘子里找”、“匆匆地往口袋里掏”等动作的描写，写出了一个高度近视、动作不利索且有点“糊涂”的老教师的特点;例二，主要抓住性格暴躁的人生气时，面部表情动作的特点来描写的。如：“气咻咻地站在门口”、“头上冒着热气”、“眉毛怒气冲冲向上挑”、“嘴向下咧着”、“肌肉纹丝不动”等，把生气时的面部表情写得生动而逼真。例三则是抓住捏泥人的动作特点，写出了一位心灵手巧的老艺人形象。

(三)是要准确而恰当地运用动词且不重复。

读读下列例段，看看各段中带点的词的作用。

1.他左脚尖顶住起跑线，膝盖一弯，稳稳地蹲着。两手就像两根木柱插在地上，整个身体微微前倾，那架势，就像一只起飞的雄鹰。

这短短的几句话中，用了“顶、弯、蹲、插、倾、飞等”6个动词，把赛场上运动员起跑的预备姿式描写得准确而逼真。

2.她挤进大门，把担子撂下地;走上前去，将地上的草揽好，用膝头压着，俯下身，双手使劲勒紧草腰子，提起来，扔到院墙角落。

段中带点的这些动词用得非常贴切。写出了一个能干、利索、有力气，干活熟练的农村姑娘的形象。

3.她看见奶奶站起来，双手抓着锅盖向上揭。吃力地揭了几次，才稍稍揭开一条缝。一股浓烟从灶口冲出来，差点熏着奶奶的脸。奶奶随便用袖子拂了拂布满皱纹的脸，又摇摇头，自言自语地说：“老了，不中用啰!”

这段话描写的是一位老奶奶干家务活的动作。用“揭、冲、熏、拂、摇”等动词，准确而恰当地写出了老人干活动作的特点。上述各例说明，描写人物的动作必须选用准确、恰当的动词，才能具体形象地写出人物的动态形象。

Directions:

Suppose you are a librarian in your university.Write a notice of about 100 words,providing the newly-enrolled international students with relevant information about the library.

You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.

Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter.Use “Li Ming”instead.

Do not write the address.(10 points)

参考范文：

Notice

Welcome you to this university and this new-bulided library. I am a libraian in our university and will give you relevent information about the library.

To begin with, there is circulation desk in the circulation hall so that you can borrow and return books more quickly and conveniently. Besides, the hours of loan books is during 9:00-17:00 from Monday to Friday so that you can take best advantage of the library. Moreover, the computer room in the library is big enough for you to search for some academic information charged by the hour so you must ensure that some money is left in your ID card.

I hope you will find the above information useful and I would be ready to discuss the matter with you to further details. If you have any questions about the library, please call 123456or send messages to 123456@abc. Wish you a good time during your colledge life.

请注意

欢迎你来这所大学和这个new-bulided库。我是一个libraian在我们的大学会给你有关信息图书馆。

首先,在循环大厅有循环桌子,这样您就可以借并返回书更快更方便。此外,小时的贷款是在9:00-17:00从星期一到星期五,这样您就可以最好的利用图书馆。此外,在图书馆计算机房对你来说是足够大的去寻找一些学术信息按小时收取所以你必须确保一些钱留在你的身份证。

我希望你会发现上面的信息是有用的,我准备和你讨论此事进一步的细节。如果你有任何问题关于图书馆,请致电123456或123456 @abc发送消息。祝你一段美好的时光在你科莱奇的生活。

熟悉考场写作三个步骤的时间分配：

第一步：审题、确定立场、列出理由最少3分钟最多5分钟。

要避免两个极端：((只需要在草稿纸上用英文单词或汉语列出各个理由，防止遗忘))

用时太少，理由没有想清楚就开始写作，不仅造成文章逻辑结构不清，还会引起行文中频繁的修正，欲速则不达;

用时太多，不要追求一次思考就能把每一条理由及相关例证都想出来。其实想出两条之后就可以动笔，各个理由的例证可以写到该段时边思考边写。这一点你不必怀疑，只要你的思维还是正常的，一定能做到。

第二步：正文写作。最少22分钟最多26分钟。

a.各段写作时注意对段落的不同部分给予不同的重视。

主题句给予最大重视，注意炼句，别说你不想写主题句，主题句可以使读者和笔者本人更清晰该段落写什么。各段中支持性细节写作不必遵循相同的模式。有n 种选择可供参考：1. 举具体事例 2. 说对方相对缺点3. 使用数据 4. 使用假想例子 5. 使用类比、比喻、引用等修辞手段来论述。 哪一种你最容易想出来，就用哪一种。

b.考前将文章开头、结尾、例证、让步等各种句套背熟练,并且练习和模考时把他们用熟，要象做完型填空一样对待考场作文。别试图在考场上再现去决定比如哪种开头好，怎样结尾好。使用自己选种的套话。

c.当被告知还有5分钟结束时，一般你已经该写到最后一条理由，或者已经在做结尾。要确保文章有结尾段。(不排除将他和最后一条理由的末段结合在一起的可能性。)

第三步：检查。需要1-3分钟，有侧重点地检查。

1、句法：确保每句话是完整的，有谓语，且简单句只有一个谓语。

2、时态：文章绝大部分使用的是一般现在时;一般现在时第三人称要使用单数;使用过去发生的事例时用的是过去时;

3、主谓一致

按此三步，持续练习5篇以上，可以确保时间问题。

整洁

1、TWE要求必须用铅笔写作文，你要自己准备好铅笔和橡皮。橡皮要有韧性，太硬会擦破纸，有错误要擦干净再改;

2、第一遍写作时要求字迹不要太大也不要太小，通常一行写10-12个左右单词为宜。如果书法不好，可以在考前练习写一下斜体的26个字母的写法 .

[托福作文写作时间分配技巧

1、要美化自己，而不是丑化自己。要显现自己的高境界、大抱负、多知识、同情心，要显现自己以天下为己任的豪情。不要出于反衬别人等考虑而故意丑化自己，如果让评卷老师以为你真就是那样，那就麻烦了，因为中考是选拔性考试。从某个角度讲，评卷老师评卷的过程就是一个选择淘汰对象的过程。

2、字数以600-900字为宜。不能给人凑字数的感觉，但也不能拖得太长，不允许加纸条。喜欢写长文的同学，开篇要注意不要放得太开，开口不要太大，能跳过去的就跳过去，要相信读者的理解能力。要注意节省篇幅，要防止高潮来了没地方写了。切忌三段文。要突出的句子(扣题的、表现主旨的、文眼、点睛之笔、抒情议论、议论文的分论点等)最好单独成段。

3、看到题目后，可先搜索一下自己以往所写的优秀作文，看有没有可以再利用的。须要注意的是一定要不牵强。

4、要力避前松后紧、虎头蛇尾。有些同学构思、提纲拟好后，开头反复推敲，精雕细琢，后来发现时间不够，于是草草收兵。此外，要谨慎对待修改。修改一般只着眼于字词方面的，可用米尺比好之后划两横。结构方面不能修改。要保持卷面的整洁美观，要努力做到改动少而效果好。

5、如果偏题或者离题，作文的主要分数就失去了。为防止跑题，可从如下几点做出努力：一是将材料、引语和话题联系起来思考，不可单看话题;二是看自己确立的观点能否用话题所给材料来证明;三是想一想这则材料当初发在媒体上登载是要达到一个什么效果的。万一跑题了，要考虑逆挽，使文章形成一种欲扬先抑的结构形态。

6、一定要完篇。熟话说，好文章是凤头、猪肚、豹尾。没有豹尾，老鼠尾巴也要有一个，绝不能写半头文。用半篇文章给你评分，怎么会得高分?

7、特别要注意不能缺题。不是万不得已，不要以话题做标题。拟题是显示你才气的一个好的平台，不能轻易放弃。缺题影响远不止2分。正好给了评卷老师扣分的理由。

8、文章要有一至两个亮点。学而思老师建议：如果是记叙文，应该用抓人的情节和生动的描写表现你的真情，记叙文不能没有描写。如果是议论文，就一定要有12个典型的论据，就应该有纵横捭阖，很深刻的见解。如果是微型小说一定要有巧妙的构思。这个亮点还可以是一句富有哲理的警句，也可以是一个精彩的比喻，也可以是一个超常的搭配(酽酽的歌喉)。总之，要能使评卷老师精神为之一震。

9、行文中要多次扣题，要一路扣题一路歌。材料、引语和话题中的相关文字至少在文中出现三次以上。开头三句话内应点题一次，结尾应回扣标题，’回眸一笑百媚生’。中间至少扣题一次。几次扣题事实上也是在不断地提醒自己不要跑题。有球场上叫暂停的效果，可以调整思路和写法。

10、思想要健康。’思想健康’不是说要你只说冠冕堂皇的话，不是要你刻意拔高，’健康’是针对’病态’、’庸俗’而言的，它的底线是不能欣赏违背法律法规和偏离社会道德的事。恋爱题材是考场作文的禁区，无论考生写得如何缠绵悱恻，真挚动人，因其行为是中学生日常行为规范所不允许的，这类作文自然得不了高分。

11、观点不可太绝对，要留有余地。’义正’未必要’辞严’，’理直’未必就要’气壮’。联系现实生活时，涉及社会黑暗面时，要有分寸，不要一味指责。’质问京山大冤案’。批评家长、老师和社会要与人为善，抱着协商与治病救人的态度，要提建设性意见。不可尖刻、讽刺、挖苦，甚至恶意地进行人身攻击。

12、临场写作时可以根据题意和你的表达需要想像一个或一类读者就在你的面前。如以’沟通’为话题作文，写与家长的沟通，可想像父母就在身边;写’沟通’之艰难和必要，就好像误解过你的人正在听你倾诉;写国际间通过沟通走向合作，就设想自己参与了国与国的谈判。即使所写文章没有明确的阅读对象，你也可以想像此文是写给你的语文老师的。你要知道，你的文章的惟一读者是那位跟你的语文老师非常相似的人。写记叙文，且最好将主人公设定为自己。想想阅卷老师的喜好，说他们想听的话。尽可能赢得评卷老师的同情。

13、写法上可以求新，要考虑，怎样表现更智慧，更艺术，更有可读性;但更要求稳。我的意见是大家一定要在一种比较稳的情况下，确有把握时才可写小小说或者是写戏剧，或者是写别的，确有把握之后才写这种文体，如果没有把握的话，就选择比较稳妥的老的文体，老的写法。

14、不可按上年或前几年的中考作文思路行文。求新、求变是人们所追求的，中考作文也不例外。但若按上年或前几年的中考作文思路行文，甚至拿来套用，机械模仿，不懂灵活应变，就会吃力不讨好，这也是失分的点。因为阅卷者大都是相对固定的，对以前的中考作文非常熟悉。不主张写诗歌、文言文。

15、苦于材料缺乏则可以突出自己的爱好。你如果喜欢体育，那你就像体育记者一样，叙体育、议体育，只要切合题意就好。你如果喜欢听××的歌、看××的书、爱好上网……你就可以将自己这一方面的经历和感受与命题联系起来。那样就不愁内容贫乏、文思枯竭。不要瞎编乱造。靠编故事骗取老师的眼泪从而获得高分的时代已经一去不复返了。

16、充分发挥自己的优势。擅长形象思维、会刻画人物的同学可选择记叙文，擅长抒情的同学可选择散文。初中生一般不提倡写议论文。

17、精写前几段，给评卷老师留下一个好印象。要精雕细刻，要出彩。比如，可开门见山，直奔主题;可制造悬念，引人入胜;可提出问题，引人注意;或巧用排比、比喻、拟人等修辞手法，或。巧述故事，引人入胜，或巧用题记，揭示主旨，或巧用诗文显诗意。写好结尾和过渡段。阅卷老师一般是S型的扫描全文。结尾可画龙点睛，发人深思;或总结全文，照应开头;或虚笔拓展，扩大容量;或精辟议论，深化主旨。

18、要给自己充足的构思时间，不要急于动笔，’宁停三分，不争一秒’，因为写作是’开弓没有回头箭’的，写到一半，突然发现，呀，把题目理解错了，或没领会好命题的要求。最可怕的是文章写到一半，又想另起炉灶。时间没了，心情也坏了。干着急。建议打草稿，防止’三边工程’(边立项，边设计，边施工)。考场作文不宜见异思迁，边写边改。要贯彻一种构思。一旦构思已定，就不要轻易改变。

技巧一：首尾呼应，凸显主旨

(首)都说生活的船不能没有理想的帆，都说生活的理想就是为了理想的生活，而理想的生活中最快乐的时光，便是梦想的花季。

(尾)花季中，我希望自己能永远记住先哲的那句良训：生活的船不能没有理想的帆。生活的理想就是为了理想的生活。(选自湖荆州中考满分文《把梦想带给花季》)

技巧点拨：首尾呼应是考场作文中最实用的方法之一，一般情况是作者先在开头提出文章的中心，然后在结尾时再次强调，照应开头，从而使文章的中心鲜明突出。你看，在上例中，小作者运用首尾呼应的方式，以优美的诗一般的语言凸显了文章的主旨――理想的生活中最快乐的时光，便是梦想的花季。

(首)有一种光华，笼罩着中华民族的精神家园;有一种火苗，跃动在民族灵魂的奥林匹克山上;有一种烈焰，温暖了绵远的文明情思，那就是友善!

(尾)我们不能因为屡受伤害就失去与丑恶斗争的信心，因为我们需要守卫我们的精神火种――友善!(选自河南中考满分文《守卫精神的火种》)

技巧点拨：这是一篇考场议论文的开头与结尾，与上例相比，此例为简洁明快，开头提出论点，迅速入题，结尾再次反复，呼应开头，加强了论证的力度。

技巧二：言为心声，呼唤号召

让我们大家行动起来吧，把爱心带给他人，带给那些失学儿童，带给那些孤寡老人……带给身边的每一个人。当你把爱心献给他人时，你也获得了莫大的幸福。要相信，只要人人都献出一份爱，世界将变成美好的人间。(选自湖北荆州中考满分文《把爱心带给他人》)

二十一世纪，我们是祖国的春天，我们不是我们的父母，热情奔放是我们的性格，我们不需要守那些规矩，打破陈规，让我们脑中的那团热情火燃烧得更猛烈，把我们的笑声、爱心串在一起，让全世界笼罩在爱之中。要笑就笑个痛痛快快，要哭就哭个歇斯底里，不要压抑自己，不要让那陈旧的观念束缚着，不要随便改变自己，请记住我的名言：“我就是我，给我一点阳光就这么灿烂。”(选自福建省中考满分文《给一点阳光就这么灿烂》)

技巧点拨：考场作文讲究情感真挚，要写出自己对真善美的呼唤，对假丑恶的鞭挞。这种情感不仅局限于自己，还可以在文章结尾发出真挚的呼唤，号召大家一起去追寻真善美，一起去鞭挞假丑恶。上面小作者真情呼唤，言为心声，表现了自己美好未来的向往之情。第二段小作者言词急切，个性十足，表情达意毫无遮掩，向所有的同龄人发出了真情的呼唤，有力的突出了主题，给读者以强烈的心灵震撼。

技巧三：巧妙发问，引入深思

自然的色、自然的香、自然的味、自然的美，这一切都源于自然。自然是伟大的。是神奇的。它与生活是那么的近，那么的紧。品味自然，不就同品味生活了吗?

技巧点拨：一篇好的文章做到言有尽而意无穷，要具有哲理启发性。如同欣赏一支优美的乐曲，曲虽终但余音缭绕，给人留下无穷的韵昧。你看，在上面一段文字中，作者在结尾巧妙发问，引发读者思考，将文章的意蕴加以深化。体现出作者思考的深刻性与独特性。

不同的话有不同的影响，不同的角度有不同的视野，不同的哈哈镜有不同的成像，不同的心情会有不同的行动，不同的花有不同的花香和样子，不同的评价造就孩子不同的命运。何必要让自己狭小的视角不公地评价一个人、伤害一个人，何必要熄灭风中的烛光，何必要让所有的孩子都成为一个模子里刻出来的无个性的模型?(选自湖北省中考满分文《哈哈镜中的我》)

技巧点拨：这段结尾针对老师的评语表达了自己的看法，先用排比句的形式说明每一个学生都有自己的个性，老师不必磨灭学生个性，最后再以问句结束，启示人们进行思考，深化了文章的内涵。

技巧四：引用佳句，多姿多彩

“野芳发而幽香，佳木秀而繁阴，风霜高洁，水落而石出”，2017年来，生活让我懂得了放弃!为了我的理想，为了更多的人可以读书，我必须放弃!(选自广州中考满分文《从天空想到的》)

想到这里，我又记起了一位名人说过的一句话：“身边的书多着呢，只要发觉，肯定会学到很多……”(选自陕西中考满分文《阅读身边的人》)

明日歌中说：“明日复明日，明日何其多，我生待明日，万事成蹉跎……”希望大家能把握今天，创造出美好的明天。(选自四川内江中考满分文《创造美好的明天》)

佐拉说：“人生――只有两分半种的时间，一分种微笑、一分种叹息、半分种的爱……”在我看来，在我陶醉于欣赏母亲的梳妆中，那一分钟的微笑不是勉强，那一分钟的叹息之后不再是叹息，而是爱的传递，母亲将她对生命的爱，对生活的爱，对亲人的爱融于平日的点滴中，我忘情天其中了……(选自吉林省中考满分文《陶醉》)

技巧点拨：古今中外，名言佳句很多，作文结尾之时，若能巧妙引用，定能使文章增色许多。这里列举几例分别引用了诗文佳句、名人言论，既增添了文采又加深了文章的意境。效果很好，同学们应加以学习，此外，引用的范围可大些，如俗语、谚语、流行歌词等均可引用。

技巧五：抒情议论，气势不凡

其实宁静就是那么简单，一个浅浅的微笑，一句贴心的话语，一颗能包含一切的心灵，足以使一张紧绷的脸松弛开来，让笑容在人们脸上轻轻地绽开，那笑容就如徜徉在天边的云朵，轻轻地点缀着那片蔚蓝的天，清新而自然，(选自广州中考满分文《从天空想到的》)

春光似海，青春如花。青春是美丽的，美丽的青春在于奋斗，在于拼搏。愿天下的人们都能让自己的青春绽放出花一样的馨香!(选自吉林省中考满分文《花样年华》)

技巧点拨：这两段文字发于心，出于情，运用排比、比喻修辞，以优美的文字抒发内心真实情感，并配以适当的议论，使文章结尾气势不凡，强劲有力。

技巧六：景物烘托，情景合一

风停了，暴雨也结束了，太阳重新露出了笑容，两代人的那扇玻璃也被那片残阳熔化了。太阳在远处逐渐隐去，消失在一片晚霞中，两者混为一体，没有距离。(选自广州中考满分文《雨中品读》)

技巧点拨：这段结尾的特点十分突出，景物烘托的作用也很明显，小作者通过对雨后景物的描写暗示了两代人之间情感隔阂的消失，情与景有机地结合在了一起。含蓄隽永。余味无穷。

此刻，一缕阳光从外面射进病房，我感到自已真像一棵受伤的小树沐浴着它。呵，成长的路上，虽然风云莫测，但是阳光毕竟很好!我想。(选自湖北省仙桃市中考满分文《在阳光下成长》)

技巧点拨：这段结尾突出阳光的作用，将阳光与成长结合在一起，暗示自己成长道路虽不平坦但充满阳光，表达出一种乐观向上的情绪。既照应了主旨，又显得情韵深厚。

导语：屈原是中国最伟大的浪漫主义诗人之一，也是我国已知最早的著名诗人，世界文化名人。他创立了“楚辞”这种文体，也开创了“香草美人”的传统。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的中考作文素材，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

屈原所在的时期正是中国即将实现大一统的前夕，“横则秦帝，纵则楚王。”屈原因出身贵族，又明于治乱，娴于辞令，故而早年深受楚怀王的宠信，位为左徒、三闾大夫。他为实现楚国的统一大业，对内积极辅佐怀王变法图强，对外坚决主张联齐抗秦，使楚国一度出现了一个国富兵强、威震诸侯的局面。但是由于在内政外交上屈原与楚国腐朽贵族集团发生了尖锐的矛盾，由于上官大夫等人的嫉妒，屈原后来遭到群小的诬陷和楚怀王的疏远，最终被逐出郢都，到了汉北。顷襄王二十一年，秦将白起攻破郢都，几起几落的屈原悲愤难捱，遂自沉汨罗江，以身殉了自己的政治理想。屈原在20多年的流放生活中，始终关心着楚国的命运，陆续地写出了《离骚》、《天问》、《招魂》、《哀郢》等诗篇，表白了自己不愿与黑暗腐朽的势力同流合污的立场和决心。

高中课文《屈原列传》、《离骚》、《湘夫人》等，都说到屈原。

【原文再现】

屈平疾王听之不聪也，谗谄之蔽明也，邪曲之害公也，方正之不容也，故忧愁幽思而作《离骚》。“离骚”者，犹离忧也。夫天者，人之始也;父母者，人之本也。人穷则反本，故劳苦倦极，未尝不呼天也;疾痛惨怛，未尝不呼父母也。屈平正道直行，竭忠尽智，以事其君，谗人间之，可谓穷矣。信而见疑，忠而被谤，能无怨乎?屈平之作《离骚》，盖自怨生也。上称帝喾，下道齐桓，中述汤、武，以刺世事。明道德之广崇，治乱之条贯，靡不毕见。其文约，其辞微，其志洁，其行廉。其称文小而其指极大，举类迩而见义远。其志洁，故其称物芳;其行廉，故死而不容。自疏濯淖污泥之中，蝉蜕于浊秽，以浮游尘埃之外，不获世之滋垢，皭然泥而不滓者也。推此志也，虽与日月争光可也。

——摘自《屈原列传》

【素材评析】

在屈原的作品《涉江》一诗中他自己写到：“吾与重华游兮瑶之圃，登昆仑兮食玉英。与天地兮同寿，与日月兮齐光。”这是屈原受到奸臣谗陷，被楚王流放时，在愤激之下而写的。正如司马迁所说：“信而见疑，忠而被谤，能无怨乎?”所以作诗《离骚》泄愤。但是，屈原的高洁之处，在于他无论遭受什么样的打击与谄害，但他总是执着地坚持自己的操守，所以司马迁赞美到：“推此志也，虽与日月争光可也。”

【适用话题】

适用“肩膀”、“位置与价值”、“我想握住你的手”、“感情亲疏与对事物的认知”、“责任”、“理想”、“执着”等等。

大作文开头段往往要包含如下几个关键内容，即，介绍背景，引出有争议的话题，阐述对立观点和陈述作者自己的观点。无论使用还是不使用模板，这几个关键信息是一定要包含在开头段落当中的，不然云里雾里，只能是适得其反。

首先It is quite common these days.。。介绍背景，或者用The issue of ... is a complex and sensitive one。这样的句型来引出有争议话题，然后千篇一律地分别介绍对立双方观点，如Some individuals believe that..., while others hold the view that....最终用Personally, I agree with....至此，内容上完美无瑕，但恐怕考官心中已经大大打下“模板”两个字的烙印，这无疑对于想取得6分及以上的同学最不利的事情。下面，我们就来说说到底应该如何突破“模板病”。

例如，一道雅思写作高频题目，讨论到底大学应该教授实用性课程（如计算机和商科课程）还是传统课程（如历史和地理）。我们依然按照开头段应该包含的关键信息开始写作，但是却可以这样轻松突破：

These day there is a growing tendency for college students to have difficulties in finding jobs when they graduate.(介绍背景)A large number of people hold the opinion that lack of practical knowledge, among other things, contributes to this situation. In light of this, they contend that college teachers should lay more stress on practical courses than on traditional ones. (引出有争议的话题，并阐述大多数人的观点)For my part, I am in favour of their viewpoint。(作者观点)

这一段写得非常灵巧，第一句结合题目背景，介绍现如今有一种趋势，即大学毕业生很难找到工作，紧接着作者陈述有许多人认为这是由于学生缺少实用性的知识，并因此提出大学应该更多关注于教授实用性的知识，这一句将有争议话题的其中一方观点用因果链条清晰阐述。最后一句表达作者自己的立场，就是支持前面大多数人的想法。总的来看，这一段只提及了对立双方的其中一方观点，然后表达自己支持这一方观点。这就是一种对于开头段模板的超越，简单可行，只对其中一方观点清晰论证，然后表达自己的立场，无需对另一方观点赘述。这固然超越了八股文一样的“一些人认为……另一些人认为……，我认为……”，而是以四两拨千斤的方式，重点讲解一方观点，然后巧妙表达支持的态度。

另一道可以参考的题目是有关人们认为对于罪犯不应该只是关在监狱里，而应该对他们进行教育和劳动改造这样一道题目。我们依然给出这样一段：

How to handle criminals is a problem that all countries and societies face。(引出有争议的话题)Traditionally, the approach has been to punish them by placing them in prisons to pay for what they have done. Some, however, advocate for trying to make them better with training and education and it seems they may have a good point.

这一段在观点描述上是“出于模板而胜于模板”的典范，范文中将观点一演变为“传统上，人们都采取关监狱这种方法”，这就用陈述事实的方式，巧妙避讳了直接表达有些人认为应该把犯人关在监狱里；而观点二以及作者观点合并为一句，用一个and巧妙连接成一个并列句。开头段关键信息一网打尽。

掌握写作技巧，对写作具有重要的意义，任何否定写作技巧在写作中的客观作用的观点无疑是错误的。小编收集了如何训练写作技巧，欢迎阅读。

第一，写作技巧是实现作者写作意图的重要条件。一般来说，作者的写作活动都具有一定的写作意图。所谓的写作意图，就是指作者打算在文章或作品中表达什么样的生活和思想内容，以及通过这种表达达到什么目的。而要使这一写作意图圆满实现，就必须依靠写作技巧。

第二，写作技巧是构成文学作品艺术性的内在因素。文学作品的艺术性，即文学作品反映社会生活或表达思想感情所达到的完美程度。这种艺术性的取得，决定于作者的世界观、创作方法和写作技巧。在具体的作品中，艺术性表现在作家在一定世界观的指导下，运用各种写作手法，创造出具有审美价值的艺术意境我典型形象，从而给读者带来审美愉悦。文学作品的艺术性虽不同于形式美，但它更多地体现在与内容和谐统一的艺术形式之中，而艺术形式的完美创造，则依靠写作技巧。

那么什么是写作技巧的操作训练呢?

(一)师法生活

生活是写作的源泉，丰富多采的大自然和人类社会，不仅为我们提供了取之不尽的写作材料，而且为我们提供了生动鲜活的关于写作形式与写作技巧的深刻启示。例如，巧合与悬念，往往是某些生活事件展示在人们面前时固有形式或“手法”;对比与映衬，常常是构成大自然优美景观及“艺术”美感的重要因素和“手段”;“人有悲欢离合，月有阴睛圆缺”作文人网 你也可以投稿，人生和自然的规律中寓含着曲折美、变化美、节奏美;“蝉鸣林逾静，鸟鸣山更幽”，常见的景象中包含着动与静相反相成的艺术辨证法则……因此，我们学习写作技巧，必须首先向生活学习。只有勤于观察生活，深入体验生活，才能使自己的写作技巧真正得到提高。

(二)阅读、借鉴

即从古今中外的优秀文章(以及音乐、绘画等艺术形式)中汲取营养。凡优秀的文章，内容和形式的完美程度都较高，其写作技巧往往是娴熟而又富于创造性。多读优秀的文章，在注意思想内容的同时，注意其写作技巧，看作者是运用哪些来表现思想内容，实现写作意图的，并且分析这些写作手法的具体运用情况及其所取得的写作效果。在此基础上，还应结合实际(写作者自身的思想和艺术修养的实际与题材和表现对象的实际)进一步思考，看哪些手法可以“拿来”，经过改造为我所用。这样，久而久之，潜移默化，自己的写作技巧，自然会有所提高。

(三)经常练笔

这是具有本质意义的技巧“操作训练”。清人唐彪写道：“谚云，‘读十篇不如做一篇’。盖常作则机关熟，题虽甚难，为之亦易;不常做，则理路生，题虽甚易，为之则难。沈虹野云：‘文章硬涩由于不熟，不熟由于不多做。’信哉言乎!”多写才能熟，熟才能生巧，这是不可更易的规律，任何企图改变或超越这一规律的人，永远也掌握不了写作技巧，永远也写不出好文章。只有经常写，反复写，才可能在写作者身上固定下一个写作技巧的“概括化系统”，一个“自动化的”写作“行动方式”。懂得了这一点，我们就会懂得那些语言艺术大师们为什么谆谆劝诫“我们大家都应该写、写、写，写得尽量多”了。

写作技巧的掌握是有一个过程的。这个过程可以分为两个阶段。一是“技能”阶段，一是“熟练”阶段。“技能”阶段，是无法之中求有法，能过观察、体验、多读、多写，学习并掌握了一些写作的基本手法，且能将它们运用于写作实践。这是掌握写作技巧的第一阶段。“熟练”阶段，是有法之中求变化。在第一阶段的基础上，进而掌握了包括写作的辨证艺术在内的多种写作手法，并能将它们纯熟自如、富于创造性地运用于写作实践。这是掌握写作技巧的第二阶段。古人说：“学诗当识活法。”“所谓活法者，规矩具备，而能出于规矩之外;变化不测，而亦不背规矩也。”识得“活法”，并能运用“活法”是掌握写作技巧第二阶段的重要标志。

掌握写作技巧，对写作具有重要的意义，任何否定写作技巧在写作中的客观作用的观点无疑是错误的。但是，我们也不能把技巧绝对化，走到唯技巧论的极端。因为，决定文章价值的主要因素，还是内容，脱离了丰富而深刻的内容，文章的审美价值乃至艺术性，也就不复存在了。这一点，尤其应该引起初学写作者的重视。

在语文教学中，对教师而言，最难教的是作文；对学生来讲，最难写的也是作文。因此，如何激发学生的写作兴趣，提高学生的写作水平，成为作文教学的根本任务。

一、留心生活，学会观察

所谓观察，就是用眼睛去看。要远“观”近“察”，事事留心，时时注意，并养成一种习惯。被誉为世界短篇小说之王的法国作家莫泊桑曾拜当时著名作家福楼拜为师。一天，他把自己坐在屋里编的准备写成小说的故事讲给福楼拜听。福楼拜听后，说：“我劝你不要忙于写这些虚拟的东西，你每天骑马到外面转一圈，把路上看到的一切准确地、细致地记录下来。”于是莫泊桑意识到福楼拜是教他首先学会用眼睛去观察生活，认识生活，练好观察这一基本功。从此他花了一年左右的时间，每天外出观察，终于写成了小说《点心》，并成为世界著名的小说家。后来莫泊桑在总结自己的创作经验时，说：“对你所要表现的东西，要长时间很注意地观察它，以便发现别人没有发现过和没有写过的特点。任何事物里，都有未被发现的东西……”鲁迅也曾说过：“留心各样的事情，多看看，不看到一点就写。”这是鲁迅长期创作的经验总结。由此可见，要想写好文章必须重视观察事物，提高观察能力。

不少学生作文脱离实际，生编硬套，字词不够废话凑，像挤牙膏似的想一句写一句。如何改变这种现象呢？我们先来看峻青的《海滨仲夏夜》一段中的描写：“夕阳落山不久，西方的天空，还燃烧着一片橘红色的晚霞。大海也被这霞光染成了红色……”这段文字确确实实是描写海上的晚霞，绝非别处，只有在海上。

作者抓住了海滨夏夜的特色，用“橘红色”来形容晚霞，用“染成了红色”写海水的色彩，用“燃烧”一词生动地描绘了晚霞的情态。为什么峻青能把海滨夏夜的景写得如此逼真形象呢？是因为作者以生活为写作素材，通过细致入微的观察、感受和思考，才把这一景色写活了。所以，在作文教学中，我们应鼓励学生全景式的扫描生活，用自己的眼，以自己的心去理解、感受生活，挖掘生活中最熟悉的，最能打动心灵的宝藏，写真人真事，抒真情实感。“必须寻到源头，方有清甘的水喝。”这“源头”就是我们的五彩缤纷的生活，让生活成为学生自己真正的创作源泉吧。

二、练写随笔，积累素材

茅盾说：“应当时时刻刻身边有一支铅笔和一本草簿，把你所见所闻所为所感随时记下来……”。写随笔，就是给学生以充分的自由：选材自由，命题自由，文体自由，字数自由。只管写自己最熟悉、最感兴趣、印象最深的人或事。可议论，可抒情，可记叙、随心所欲。洋洋洒洒几千字，不嫌多；点点滴滴几十字，不嫌少：有话则长，无话可短，尽兴而写，随意而止。这样不自觉地培养了学生的观察事物的兴趣和能力。他们写的内容起初比较简单，渐渐地，观察视野不断扩大，就从身边的小事写开去，写社会、写人生。内容越来越丰富：班级的生活与风波，家庭的欢乐与忧愁，社会见闻等等，真是大到宇宙，小到自我，尽入笔底。有个学生对校园常作细致观察，从景到人，从人到事，连续写了校园生活之

三、课外阅读，学会迁移

现在有不少学生在“题海战术”中苦斗以提高分数，“重理轻文”的现象较为严重，以致于有些学生“两耳不闻窗外事，一心只读理科书”，平时很少课外阅读，缺乏写作材料，对作文望而生畏。要使学生作文有话可说，有物可写，必须注意积累写作材料，提倡多阅读文章。杜甫说：“读书破万卷，下笔如有神。”“破万卷”是说书读得要多，书读得多，知识才厚实，才能博古通今，写起文章来才能左右逢源，才“如有神”助。但仅仅靠多读是不够的，“唐宋八大家”之一的韩愈说：“学以为耕，文以为获。”这是说阅读是写作的先导，没有读的“耕耘”，就没有写的“收获”。因此强调学生对所读之书还要进行熟读精思，融会贯通，积累材料，让它成为自己写作的“源头活水”，学会迁移，并运用到作文中去。作文时，吾意所欲言，无不随意所欲，内容应笔而生，如泉之涌，滔滔不竭。

导语：2017中考马上要来了，你作文素材准备的怎么样啦?小编偷偷告诉你优美段落的收集对于写作文很有帮助哦，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的中考作文写作素材，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

1.生活中一些微不足道的小事，只有你细细去品味时，你才会发现里面包含着许多人生的哲理。人生的奇妙之处就在这里，通过一件小事让我感悟了人生，也许在你看来很平常，而我却觉得耐人回味，值得思索。

2.每个人的这双手，都是美丽的。如果你每天让这双手一直不断地为人民服务，为人民创造幸福，这才是真正的美!勤劳的农民利用这双手在田野里耕出自己的一片地来;工厂里的工人利用这双手来做出更好的产品;老师们利用这双手来教育自己的学生。这些人都是拥有了一双美丽的手。

3.没有花香，没有树高，我是一棵无人知道的小草。”每当听到这首令人感动的歌，我就仿佛看到了绿色的小草，看到了那坚强、默默无闻的小生命，也看到了生命价值的存在。

4.春雨无声无息地下着，花儿探出了头，草儿伸直了腰，大树焕然一新，远处的山朗润起来了，河里的水涨起来了。一切都是那么清新自然。雨点敲打着窗户，落在雨伞上，滴在脸颊上，更夹杂着桃花的幽香，让人陶醉其中。

5.秋雨缠缠绵绵，重雾深锁，万木萧萧，撑天的大树经雨洗礼，显得格外苍劲，它们记录了这一年来的景致。远山的红叶满山遍野，金色的稻田一望无垠，尽显尊贵。

6.有这样一句话“人有两个宝，大脑和双手”，通过这句话我们可以了解到，双手对于我们是非常重要的，我们每天都离不开双手，无论我们是做什么的，手是必须要用的，我们每个人都拥有一双美丽的手。

7.“谁言寸草心，报得三春晖。”也许是48小时的守护感动了儿女吧!看!放大镜下那绿色的小“产床”上，一个个晶莹的鱼卵上面，摇动着一面面晶莹的小旗帜，小鱼长尾巴了啊!我又一次怦然心动，那分明是一片洒满阳光的芳草坡，那一面面摇动的旗帜，是生命的旗帜，感恩的旗帜，在向辛劳的父母致意，在向这充满爱的世界致意!

8.“昨天”阳光明媚，天上的云像棉花糖，让人感觉好想咬一口;天上的云，像妈妈的手，让人感觉那么柔软，让人感觉那么温柔。它还会变：一会儿变个狗;一会儿变个大蛋糕在头顶，一会儿又变成了一对一本正经的石狮子。

9.这棵石莲让我很感动。做人要像石莲一样坚忍不拔，像昙花一样不张扬，只有这样，我们才能十全十美。

10.走一条崎岖蜿蜒的道路必定会遇到许多困难，一路上难免磕磕碰碰的。可是“不经历风雨怎能见彩虹”，没有经历过跋山涉水的辛苦，哪能领略到达目的地的喜悦呢!有人说走平坦的路多好呀，一直走下去，一路风雨无阻。没错，走平坦的路确实轻松，但就像白开水一样，淡而无味，毫无乐趣。

11.雨，好像是千万个魔指，好像是千万条琴弦，弹出了千变万化的声音。春雨柔软，哺育万物;夏雨粗犷，自由奔放;秋雨苍凉，看尽人世;冬雨肃杀，令人畏惧。因季节而变化，情调各异。雨色美，雨声更加动听。

12.可爱的雨，一滴滴落在脸颊上，痒痒的，不用穿雨衣，便可以漫步在雨中。在户外呼吸泥土的芳香，踯躅漫步。奔放的雨，如刚出世的婴儿，哇哇大哭，将对世界的美好，一股脑全洒了出来;温柔的雨，如一位沉默的学者，无声胜有声;纯洁的雨，嗒嗒地下着，倾诉着自己的小秘密;狂暴的雨，吐露出心里所有的不满，任闪电如银蛇挥舞着，吞噬着那酷辣的太阳。

13.当生活给我们了悲伤和痛苦后，我们不要悲观，而是要用微笑去面对，因为这样我们就会走出困境，向着光明迈进，生活也会因此变得更好美好，所以说我们要用笑容面对生活，生活就会回报给我们笑容。

14.这是一次不平凡的经历，正因草地上的小花给予我启迪，让我明白不是只有主角才会散发光芒。其实很多时候，我们或许只能担任一个小小的配角，但在自己的生命历程中，我们每个人都是主角。

15.夏雨唤醒了荷叶，荷花。一池的清凉让太阳不再刺眼，不再炙热。满池的荷叶被打得笃笃响，似一个个跳跃的音符，律动出欢快的节奏。

16.我望着外面的雨，不知不觉的睡着了。在梦里，有爱我的爸爸和妈妈，还有疼我的哥哥，也许只有在梦里，我才能开心的笑一次，真希望自己一直都在做梦，不想醒来。

17.冬雨如泣如诉，在乡下，两岸茅屋炊烟阴阴沉沉，粗糙的线条被雨水浸染了，浓郁散开来。不知是哪个小毛孩，又打破了碗，打破了这宁静。

18.盛夏，清风徐来，月升东山。老槐树上虽然没有小喜鹊，但知了却不停地名叫着，鱼塘里蛙声大作，动物的叫声编织了一首新的交响曲。

19.在千姿百态的道路中，你会选择哪一条呢?“我会选择一条崎岖、蜿蜒的道路。”这是我心底最深的感受。我喜欢刺激、喜欢挑战。崎岖、蜿蜒的道路可以给人新鲜与刺激、磨炼和挑战。诸如此类，我成长的历程让我尝到了人生四大滋味。

20.幸福是许多人都追求的，而且很多人花了老大的心思寻找幸福都没有找到，其实幸福就在我们的身边，是需要我们用心体会的，我的感受就是幸福就在我身边，一天都没有离开过我，甚至在我生病的时候。

21.春天，学校变成了花的乐园，五彩缤纷的鲜花，弯着腰做早操的嫩草邀我们一同玩耍。我们在花园似的校园里赏花，逗草，感受大自然的美。夏天，虽然烈日当空，可我们学校的“保护伞”可发挥了作用，我们一起在郁郁葱葱的大树底下踢足球，赛跑，玩得可开心了。秋天，树叶开始了自己的旅程，我们捡起落叶，把它们“变成”精美的书签，让树叶笑得更可爱。冬天，我们在温暖的课室里谈心，看书，学习，让整个冬天充满欢笑。

22.街上，乘凉的人很多，男女老少，三五成群，还有小朋友呢!老爷爷们拿着烟斗，胸有成竹地谈论着今年的收成;老太太们轻轻地哼着催眠的歌谣，不停地拍着怀里甜睡的宝贝孙孙，姑娘小伙子们正在争论着什么，时而发出阵阵欢声笑语;那些天真无邪的儿童，正在追捕着繁星似的萤火虫。

23.在花坛中，在苗圃里，你一眼都能看见那绿油油、散发着它独特气味的小草。小草不与花儿争鲜艳，不与树木争高大，它甘愿做陪衬，甘愿用自己的身躯装扮出花儿的艳丽，显示出树木的高大。它们是一位幕后使者，心甘情愿让自己当陪衬供人们欣赏，虽然人们很少谈论它们，但它们已经满足了，因为它们已经默默无闻地奉献了，已经没有缺憾了。我又一次被它们震憾了，不求多美丽，不求多高大，默默无闻地奉献着自己的一切，这一生命价值又在它们身上闪光。

24.有一个广告说道：如果再不节约水，地球上的最后一滴水，将是我们人类的泪水。读后振聋发聩，令人如醍醐灌顶。为了我们子孙后代的未来，为了人类的繁荣昌盛，为了不让我们绝望的泪水成为地球上最后一滴水，让我们每一个人，从现在开始，从一点一滴做起，珍惜每一滴水。

25.经过一次再一次的摔倒，让我突然明白了什么——人生和骑车子的过程是一样的，人生的道路上不可能是一帆风顺的，注定有许多坎坷和绊脚石。不管遇到怎样的困难只要我们能够勇敢的面对，坚强的去战胜它，我们的前途就是光明的，生活就充满了阳光。

26.生活对于我们每一个人来讲，并不是一帆风顺的，我们都会遇到各种各样的困难和挫折，都会有阴天下雨的时候，当面对生活当中的这些时候时，我们不要悲观，要用微笑来面对生活，那样我们就会获得快乐。

27.我轻轻摘下那片叶子，将它放到一个透明的小玻璃鱼缸里，让那对父母放松一下紧张的身心，可它们还有点儿舍不得，一直在那片水草周围徘徊游动。为了不让它们遭受离别之苦，我把小鱼缸吊放进大鱼缸里。就这样，大鱼感觉到它们的宝宝就在身边的“育儿箱”里，终于放心进食了。

28.鲜花的美丽，是因为它得到了阳光的爱;小树的茁壮，是因为它得到了了雨露的爱;我们的健康成长，是因为在生命的每一天里，得到了母亲博大的爱……

29.啊!夏夜的田野啊，宁静安逸!到现在，我才明白“人生难得几回醉”这个句子的意思，大概这农家的生活就是一樽醇美的浓酒，有谁能够不醉呢?

30.从小草身上，我感悟到了生命的价值——坚强、默默无闻。它们只是一棵棵路边的无名草，但却以它们的实际行动充分演绎了生命价值的凯歌。

31.可爱的雨，一滴滴落在脸颊上，痒痒的，不用穿雨衣，便可以漫步在雨中。在户外呼吸泥土的芳香，踯躅漫步。奔放的雨，如刚出世的婴儿，哇哇大哭，将对世界的美好，一股脑全洒了出来;温柔的雨，如一位沉默的学者，无声胜有声;纯洁的雨，嗒嗒地下着，倾诉着自己的小秘密;狂暴的雨，吐露出心里所有的不满，任闪电如银蛇挥舞着，吞噬着那酷辣的太阳。

32.“明天”风吹雨打，天上的云顿时变了脸，成了“黑脸张飞”让人感觉天有不测风云;让人感觉想拿吸尘器把它吸了。它更是会变：一会儿变个大妖怪来吓人;一会儿变个大狮来吼人;一会儿又电闪雷鸣，吓得人直哆嗦。

33.爸爸，您对我的爱是无私的，现在我已经懂事了。以后，如果您眼花了，我来做您的眼睛，如果您的背弯了，我来做您的拐杖。因为您才会有今天的我，让我明白了感恩的重要。

34.看了这个故事，使我懂得了一个道理，那就是珍惜自己所拥有的，虽然那个孩子从未见过自己的妈妈，但是他拥有妈妈给的一切，这就是一种幸福，我们要懂得珍惜自己所拥有的一切，只有这样才能在失去的时候不后悔。

在我们作文中，不管是写人，记事，也常常会有景物描写。那么写景应注意什么呢?

⒈写景要按方位顺序，由近及远，由远及近，由上而下，由下而上，由里到外，由外到里，或由中间到四周等等有次序地描写，要主次分明，详略得当。

⒉可以按景物的类别来写，如山、水、花、鸟;瀑、石、峰、洞;亭、台、楼阁等。要写出景物的光、色、味;既要写它的静态，也要写它的动态，还可以写出它的环境气氛。

⒊要仔细观察，抓住在不同季节里景物的不同特点进行描写，不要硬编乱造，凭自己的想象来写。

⒋写景中也可以具体地写些人和事，若让人、景、事三者交融一体来写，可以使作文更为感人。

⒌写景物时不要忘掉自己与景物之间的关系，要有意识地把自己的感情、感受写进去，这样使人读了会产生一种身临其境之感。叶圣陶老爷爷写的《记金华的双龙洞》不是具有这样的特点吗?

⒍适当地、正确地引用前人描写景物的诗词歌赋，也可以为作文增色。这就需要你平时多加阅读和积累，别等用时再去找。