雾都孤儿读后感《雾都孤儿》读后感（最新20篇）

《雾都孤儿》这本书反映了十九世纪初英国的社会底层的生活。主人公奥利费儿悲惨遭遇让人们同情不已。整个故事告诉人们这样一个主题：善良可以克服一切艰难，最终战胜邪恶，给人们带来真正的快乐和幸福。

这本书主要讲了奥利费儿是个孤儿，在济贫院中长大，不幸误入了贼窟。有一天，奥利费尔在街上被警察误捕，好心的布朗洛绅士救了他。后来奥利尔又被盗匪劫去参加抢劫，好心的主人罗斯小姐收留了它。原来，奥利费尔的同父异母兄长蒙克斯买通了贼中首领——老费金，企图把奥利费尔变成罪犯，自己霸占全部遗产。女贼南希找到罗斯小姐说出了一切，结果被老费金的手下赛克斯所杀死。之后，老费金走上了绞架，好心的绅士布朗洛揭发了蒙克斯的罪恶，并收养了奥利费尔。从此，大家一起过上了幸福的生活。

这本书语句描写非常优美如：“夜色一片漆黑，大雾弥漫。店铺的灯光几乎不能穿过厚厚的浑浊雾气，街道和房屋都笼罩在朦胧的黑暗中。”书中的钢笔画插图也画的非常生动细致，让我陶醉其中。

《雾都孤儿》揭露许多当时的社会问题，如救济院、童工、以及帮派吸收青少年参与犯罪等。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing theirkindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell thosevermin-to-beto learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

看了《雾都孤儿》，让我受益非浅，让我懂得了社会的冷酷与人的性格的残暴。我们要行动，帮助他们，挽救他们。

《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯第二部长篇小说。这位年仅二十五岁的小说家决心学习英国现实主义画家威廉·荷加斯的榜样，勇敢地直面人生，真实地表现当时伦敦贫民窟的悲惨生活。他抱着一个崇高的道德意图：抗议社会的不公，并唤起社会舆论，推行改革，使处于水深火热中的贫民得到救助。正因为如此，狄更斯历来被我国及前苏联学者界定为“英国文学上批判现实主义的创始人和最伟大的代表”。

对此，我有一些不同的见解：文学艺术是一种特殊的社会意识形态，它必然是社会存在的反映。但是，我们决不能把反映现实的文学都说成是现实主义文学，把“现实主义”的外延无限扩展。事实上，作家运用的创作方法多种多样，因人而异，这和作家的特殊气质和性格特点密切相关。狄更斯的创作，想像力极为丰富，充满诗的激情，他着意渲染自己的道德理想，处处突破自然的忠实临摹，借用一句歌德的话：它比自然高了一层。这和萨克雷、特洛罗普等坚持的客观。冷静、严格写实的方法有显着的区别。

奥利弗——一个孤儿，他被投入了一个充满贫困与犯罪的世界，忍饥挨饿，挨打挨骂，从来没有人关心他。邪恶的费金，残暴的比尔?赛克斯，以及一大群窃贼强盗。他们把奥利弗训练成一个神偷手，然后利用他去骗取钱财。可是奥利弗不愿去干这些事情，费金就对他拳打脚踢，迫使奥利弗到处流浪。幸运的是，他遇到了一群善良的人，对他无微不至的关怀，让奥利弗感到非常温暖。

Oliver Twist one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist an orphan who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain such as hunger thirst beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief as was written in all the best stories the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them or Rose read to him and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary as the famous saying goes The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing theirkindness they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay Goodness of all virtues and dignities of the mind is the greatest being the character of the Deity and without it man is a busy mischievous wretched thing no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore I a kind person want to tell thosevermin-to-beto learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodnecould conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodneis omnipotent yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me the nature of goodneis one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodneis to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodneis an utterly worthleperson. On the contrary as the famous saying goes ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’ he who is with goodneundoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodnein humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’ they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay ‘Goodness of all virtues and dignities of the mind is the greatest being the character of the Deity and without it man is a busy mischievous wretched thing no better than a kind of vermin.’

在下雨天读书是最惬意的事情了，刚巧，最近连续几天都在下雨。于是我便拿出了新买的《雾都孤儿》看了起来。

一开始，我只看书中那跌宕起伏的情节，没有认真去品味这本书。不过，它的情节也确实有意思，讲的是孤儿奥利弗在贫困院受到极不公平的虐待，经过几番波折终于离开了这个让他生不如死的鬼地方。但是他刚出狼穴又入虎口，误入了贼窝，被迫与凶恶的强盗一起偷东西，干了不少错事。但是在好心人的帮助下他终于查清了自己的身世并获得了最终的幸福……

第二遍翻开书的时候，我惊奇的发现这本书的背后竟然隐藏着无穷的内涵。这本书展现出了当时英国动荡不安的社会，揭露了那些虚伪的绅士的种.种恶行，体现出贫苦老百姓生活的艰辛。鞭挞了当时资本主义的黑暗与虚伪。在这本书中，奥利弗、南希、罗斯小姐都是善良的代表，他们在黑暗的笼罩下，不仅没有受到污染，而且还能留出一片纯净的心灵，一颗善良的心。黑暗并没有能使他们堕落，这更体现了他们高尚的品格。尽管南希最终没能活下来，但她引起的社会力量是无穷的。从而也引发了费金一伙人的灭亡。这不正告诉了我们一个流传了几千年的永垂不朽的真理吗?那就是邪恶永远打败不了正义!

书中的主人公奥利弗是一个孤儿，但是他从来没有放弃过追求美好生活的理想，即使是身陷险境，即使是痛失双亲，即使是遭人殴打，即使是被误认为小偷，他依然坚持不懈着，为着自己的目标而奋斗，最终不就获得了自由、得得到了幸福吗?我们在现实生活中有时也会遇到一些困难，有时甚至会想着退缩，这时候，想一想奥利弗那坚持不懈的精神，就会获得坚持下去的信念!从而完成哪些困难。

《雾都孤儿》用最直观的故事告诉我们面对困难的时候不要畏缩，坚持不懈就能战胜困难、取得胜利。同时也告诉我们，真正的正义是不会受黑暗与虚伪的诱惑的，在心里留一片纯净，留一颗善良的心……

初次翻开《雾都孤儿》这本书，是在一个午后，阳光暖暖的射在我的脸。 在此之前，我看过同名的电影，电影中小主人公清澈的眼睛给了我十分深刻的印象。但是电影毕竟是短短的一个多小时，很难讲述出那长长的人生，于是我翻开了这本书。看了几页后，小奥力弗的形象便跳进我的脑海中。于是读着这本书就不再是看着简单的文字了，仿佛真实的生活在我的脑海中演绎着。

故事讲述的是一个名叫奥力弗.退斯特的弃婴在孤儿院里被悲惨地教育了9年，然后又被送到棺材老板那儿当学徒。由于难以忍受的饥饿和暴力以及侮辱，他逃亡伦敦。又不幸误入贼窝，期间被一位善良的的老绅士班布尔先生收留。但又被那一伙贼绑回贼窝。最后善良的女扒手南希为了营救奥利佛，不顾贼头的监视和威胁，向班布尔报信，说奥利佛就是他找寻已久的外孙儿。南希被贼窝头目杀害，警察随即围剿了贼窝。奥利佛终于得以与亲人团聚。

这本书给我的第一个感触就是：看着这本书，好几次泪水打湿了我的眼睛。不仅是为了小奥力弗.退斯特的悲惨遭遇，更是为他的善良，南希和其他小扒手的无奈，甚至是老犹太费根。书中每一个人都有这鲜明的性格。奥力弗.退斯特虽是书中的主人公，但我觉得奥力弗不是他一个人，而是孤儿院里的所有孤儿甚至是所有的在苦难中的孩子，也许他们最后都没有奥力弗的幸运，但奥力弗的幸运也只是作者对于生活的美好希望，在当时年代更多的人只能是拥有奥力弗的朋友狄克的悲惨结局。“这个孩子面色苍白，瘦骨如柴，面颊凹了进去，眼睛显得又亮又大。拼命省料的教区施衣——他的贫儿号衣——在他弱不禁风的身上仍显得宽松肥大;他幼嫩的身体却像老人一般干枯了”这就是狄克的真实形象，可以说是所有贫儿的形象，迎接他们的只有死亡。看到这，我哭了，眼泪并不能起到什么作用，但至少代表着触及灵魂的感触。

在书中并不起眼，但是不能没有的人就是女扒手南希，她的形象是世上母亲的形象，看到可怜的而有善良的小奥力弗，她不顾背叛他所爱的人塞克斯，也不顾自己冒着被抓，被处以绞刑的危险，为小奥力弗逃出悲惨的生活，最后掺死于塞克斯的拳头之下。没有太多对于南希的描写，但是她的内心世界读者能略微感受得出来：无助，愤怒，矛盾。她与习艺所的曼太太形成了鲜明的对比。可憎的曼太太贪婪地剥削着那些可怜的小生命，却从来不为自己的行为感到可耻，也许我们也不能太多地责怪于曼太太，生活的残酷造就了人们的残酷。只是在一些勇敢的人心中残存的那一点善良给予了我们那么一点感叹，但是最后的命运仍逃脱不了悲惨的死去。

这本书给我的第二个很深的感触就是主人公小奥力弗的勇敢的精神，虽然在黑暗的习艺所里饱尝了生活的艰辛，但是并没有给这么一个美好的心灵蒙上灰尘。由于饥饿他向干事提出需要一碗稀粥时，被那些干事认为“这2孩子将来一定会被绞死。在当学徒的时候他面对人们对于他母亲的羞辱，奋起反抗。他啊也许是由于初生牛犊不怕虎，竭尽全力反抗着。后来逃亡到伦敦后，纯洁的心灵让人们感到可笑。其中有一段话让我记忆尤深“那些都是老先生的，在我还热病快死掉的时候，是那位好心的先生把我带到他家里去，照看我养好了病。哦，求求你们把这些都送回去吧，把书和钱还给他。你们要我一辈子待在这儿都可以，我只求你们把这些东西送回去，不然他们应定会以为我逃跑了的，你们可怜可怜我，把书和钱送回去吧”这是小奥力弗被抓后说的话。我不禁被他维护尊严的行为所打动。一个人活着就要有尊严。

这本书给我第三个很深印象的就是作者的写作手法 个性化的语言是狄更斯在人物塑造上运用得十分出色的一种手段.书中的流氓,盗贼,妓女的语言都切合其身份,另外狄更斯的语言中充满了讥讽的韵味。仿佛一个人的表情中带着辛酸的笑，让人读完之后不禁无奈的一声叹息。

合上这本书我没有太多的感慨，只有一个：人活着只要不断地向这梦想千金不需要顾虑太多，不要向命运低头，命运永远在我们手中。

在暑假里，我读了一本书，名叫《雾都孤儿》它是英国著名作家，查尔斯。狄更新写的。在这本书中，他运用了幽默夸张的语言，讽刺了英国社会底层生活的黑暗。文章有着强烈的感情，使人无不引发深思。

这本书以伦敦为背景，讲述了孤儿奥立弗悲惨的身世以及遭遇。他出生在济贫院，他的母亲在生下他后便去世了，后来他就一直生活在如同地狱一般的济贫院，被人们当作物品一样被送来送去，受尽折磨，从未得到过母爱和家庭的温暖。在他九岁时，便被人送进棺材店，因为不堪忍受非人的待遇，艰苦逃难，却又不幸误入贼窝被迫与狠毒的费根一伙，历经无数艰苦和心酸，最后在，好心人的帮助下转危为安，过上了幸福的生活。

读完这本书，我的心情久久不能平静，抬头看着灯光下水杯的阴影，我明白有光就有影子。奥利弗的勇敢，布朗娄先生，梅里太太，露丝小姐的善良与邪恶的盗贼们形成了鲜明的对比，就像灯光下的物体一样，它们有虚有实虚，影子是虚的，体现的是正义，而影子却是恶，但是，邪恶终究战胜不了正义。就像钢琴上有52个白键，有36个黑键，而白键永远比黑键多，正所谓邪不压正。无论何时何地，善人总比恶人多。勇敢善良的奥立弗虽出于淤泥，却丝毫不染。而我们也没有见过他失败。因为他早已看透了这个邪恶的世界，他明白，只有去拼搏，去奋斗，才会让自己活得更好。而我们也不是应该明白这个道理吗?无论做什么事情都要去努力，都要去拼搏才能成功，不会失败。所以让我们行动起来吧，去努力去拼搏，让自己的明天更加的辉煌。

《雾都孤儿》是十九世纪英国最杰出的小说家查尔斯.狄更斯创作的一部小说。

小说中的主人公奥立弗.退斯特从小失去了父母，是一个孤儿。他是在济贫院里长大的。那里的生活非常艰苦，食物非常简单，通常是一碗玉米粥、一块干面包，奥立弗.退斯特在这样的环境中度过了九年。

奥立弗.退斯特非常不幸，但他也是幸运的，他曾被迫加入强盗的行列，但他没有泯灭天良。后来通过亲人、朋友的帮忙，奥立弗.退斯特终于弄清了自己的身份，并得到了一部分遗产：八百英镑。好心的布朗罗先生把奥立弗.退斯特当作亲生儿子来看待，奥立弗.退斯特建了新家，过上了幸福的生活。

书中最让人感动的是，十岁的奥立弗.退斯特被迫从济贫院里逃了出来，不料被一个名叫杰克的窃贼盯上。杰克把奥立弗.退斯特带到了贼窝，那些贼们妄想把奥立弗.退斯特训练成一个小偷。奥立弗.退斯特受尽了百般折磨，他不断地想方设法逃离，并十分顽强地与敌人搏斗，终于逃了出来。奥立弗.退斯特是宁愿过着流浪的生活，也宁死不愿去当小偷。

看完了这本书，我深切地感受到奥立弗.退斯特的命运是多么的曲折不幸。但他凭借着刚毅顽强的意志、坚持不懈的精神战胜了生活中碰到的一个个困难，终于让自己过上了美好的生活。奥立弗.退斯特真是好样的!

与奥立弗.退斯特相比，我真是太幸福了!我有一个幸福的家，爸爸妈妈很爱我!我要好好地珍惜这一切!更要努力学好知识，让自己成为一个有用的人，来回报家庭，回报社会呀!

有一天，我从书架上发现了一本狄更斯的《雾都孤儿》，便抽出来看，一下子就吸引了我。

故事讲述的是一个名叫奥力弗.退斯特的弃婴在孤儿院里被悲惨地教育了9年，然后又被送到棺材老板那儿当学徒。由于难以忍受的饥饿和暴力以及侮辱，他逃亡伦敦。又不幸误入贼窝，期间被一位善良的的老绅士班布尔先生收留。但又被那一伙贼绑回贼窝。最后善良的女扒手南希为了营救奥利佛，不顾贼头的监视和威胁，向班布尔报信，说奥利佛就是他找寻已久的外孙儿。南希被贼窝头目杀害，警察随即围剿了贼窝。奥利佛终于得以与亲人团聚。

这本书给我的第一个感触就是：看着这本书，好几次泪水打湿了我的眼睛。不仅是为了小奥力弗.退斯特的悲惨遭遇，更是为他的善良，南希和其他小扒手的无奈，甚至是老犹太费根。书中每一个人都有这鲜明的性格。奥力弗.退斯特虽是书中的主人公，但我觉得奥力弗不是他一个人，而是孤儿院里的所有孤儿甚至是所有的在苦难中的孩子，也许他们最后都没有奥力弗的幸运，但奥力弗的幸运也只是作者对于生活的美好希望，在当时年代更多的人只能是拥有奥力弗的朋友狄克的悲惨结局。“这个孩子面色苍白，瘦骨如柴，面颊凹了进去，眼睛显得又亮又大。拼命省料的教区施衣——他的贫儿号衣——在他弱不禁风的身上仍显得宽松肥大;他幼嫩的身体却像老人一般干枯了”这就是狄克的真实形象，可以说是所有贫儿的形象，迎接他们的只有死亡。看到这，我哭了，眼泪并不能起到什么作用，但至少代表着触及灵魂的感触。

这本书给我的第二个很深的感触就是主人公小奥力弗的勇敢的精神，虽然在黑暗的习艺所里饱尝了生活的艰辛，但是并没有给这么一个美好的心灵蒙上灰尘。由于饥饿他向干事提出需要一碗稀粥时，被那些干事认为“这2孩子将来一定会被绞死。在当学徒的时候他面对人们对于他母亲的羞辱，奋起反抗。他啊也许是由于初生牛犊不怕虎，竭尽全力反抗着。后来逃亡到伦敦后，纯洁的心灵让人们感到可笑。其中有一段话让我记忆尤深“那些都是老先生的，在我还热病快死掉的时候，是那位好心的先生把我带到他家里去，照看我养好了病。哦，求求你们把这些都送回去吧，把书和钱还给他。你们要我一辈子待在这儿都可以，我只求你们把这些东西送回去，不然他们应定会以为我逃跑了的，你们可怜可怜我，把书和钱送回去吧”这是小奥力弗被抓后说的话。我不禁被他维护尊严的行为所打动。一个人活着就要有尊严。

这本书给我第三个很深印象的就是作者的写作手法 个性化的语言是狄更斯在人物塑造上运用得十分出色的一种手段.书中的流氓,盗贼,妓女的语言都切合其身份,另外狄更斯的语言中充满了讥讽的韵味。仿佛一个人的表情中带着辛酸的笑，让人读完之后不禁无奈的一声叹息。在书中狄更斯成功地刻画了一连串人物，如教区干事班布尔，贼头儿犹太老头和慈善学校的学生诺亚，破屋大盗蒙克斯等等。没有一个不刻画得栩栩如生，形象逼真。但是，作品中最成功刻画的人物还是主角奥立佛以及女偷南茜。奥立佛天生就是一个有道德的人，懂得知恩图报。他吃了很多很多苦，但最后总算遇到好人。不管是布朗鲁先生，还是梅里太太，或是梅里小姐，对待奥里佛都如同亲人一般，尽管他是个“贼”，他们都同情他，收养他，并使他接受良好的教育，最后还弄清了他的身世，争回他的遗产。在描写奥立佛所有的事件中，我最钦佩的还是第六章节中讲他受嘲讽时奋力抵抗这一事件，如同作者所说的那样“从表面上看我所记述的是那么微小又不重要，可是事实上他对奥立佛的前途及发展却间接地影响，并产生了重大的变化。”奥立佛虽说在贫民院中长大，本身就没有自由，受人使唤，但他还是一个自尊心极强的人，面对诺亚的人身攻击，他显得异常激动。而因为诺亚对奥立佛死去的母亲的恶毒侮辱使他义愤填膺，热血沸腾。“他立刻跳了起来，一把掀翻了桌椅，然后揪住诺亚的喉管，用尽全身暴怒中的力气抖动着诺亚，一直抖得诺亚的牙齿发出格格的响声，然后又聚集了他全身的力气给诺亚狠狠一拳，直把他打翻在地。”奥立佛激烈的反应令我迷惑，按常理来说，他一直是个文静的，温和的，虽受到非人虐待却是个垂头丧气自甘倒霉的少年，此刻却凝聚全身的力量揍诺亚。是什么力量使他敢于做出这样的决定，或许不应该是“决定”吧，强烈的愤怒感使他失去了理智，他不允许别人对他的母亲有丝毫的侮辱。虽然奥立佛对他的母亲毫无印象，记忆中从来就不知道母亲长什么样子。然而，对母亲的尊重感却一直伴随着他。所以，当诺亚侮辱他的母亲时，奥立佛显现出从没有过的激动。这一事件的结果是奥立佛受到了毒打并被关押起来。狄更斯在写这一细节时不仅是为下文埋下伏笔，还更深刻地刻画了作品的主人公奥立佛的形象，为维护母亲的尊严而不顾一切 在书中并不起眼，但是不能没有的人就是女扒手南希，她的形象是世上母亲的形象，看到可怜的而有善良的小奥力弗，她不顾背叛他所爱的人塞克斯，也不顾自己冒着被抓，被处以绞刑的危险，为小奥力弗逃出悲惨的生活，最后掺死于塞克斯的拳头之下。没有太多对于南希的描写，但是她的内心世界读者能略微感受得出来：无助，愤怒，矛盾。她与习艺所的曼太太形成了鲜明的对比。可憎的曼太太贪婪地剥削着那些可怜的小生命，却从来不为自己的行为感到可耻，也许我们也不能太多地责怪于曼太太，生活的残酷造就了人们的残酷。只是在一些勇敢的人心中残存的那一点善良给予了我们那么一点感叹，但是最后的命运仍逃脱不了悲惨的死去。奥立佛和南茜是这部作品中两个最具有代表性的人物，这是不可否认的。狄更斯在刻画这两个人物时也用了绝妙的手法。然而，在这里我想谈的是另一个形象人物蒙克斯。蒙克斯是奥立佛同父异母的兄弟，但此人却残忍无比，为得到弟弟的财产而不惜毁掉自己的弟弟。我觉得狄更斯在描写蒙克斯的行为时用了巧妙的安排。而蒙克斯这一角色正反映了当时社会上一些贵族子弟的放浪的行为。蒙克斯是聪明人，他知道怎样才能安心地获得弟弟的财产。狄更斯在刻画蒙克斯这一人物形象上可谓是步步为营。首先，蒙克斯是在找班布尔先生时才出现的，作者在前文中并未提到他，以致于我在读到班布尔先生与陌生客人见面这一情节时，直觉就告诉我这一作品的情节将达到另一高潮。神秘人现身，定是有好戏，但我没有想到这个所谓的神秘人竟会是奥立佛的哥哥，而且没想到在后文中他竟扮演了如此重要的角色。狄更斯赋予了蒙克斯“聪明”的头脑，设置了一个无衣无缝的计划，而蒙克斯在施行这一计划时也不吝于跟盗贼首领犹太老头合作，可谓是为达目的不择手段。最后他们的计划还是败露，蒙克斯也是惨败收场。我想，狄更斯把奥立佛的哥哥写成一个贪婪、残暴、无耻的人，一方面能使作品的剧情达到高潮，另一方面也充分展示了现实社火中为达目的而不顾亲情的悲惨现象。作者用这种犀利的笔锋讽刺当时的社火，同时又希望能唤醒那些可悲的人们，唤醒他们的良心与觉悟，唤醒所有人民的觉悟。

读完这部小说，我心里久久不能平静。奥立佛是个坚强、善良、聪慧和勇敢的天真男孩，却经历了坎坷的人生，最终雨过天晴，迎来了幸福的生活。而我们现在是生活在蜜罐里，在福窝中，却经常抱怨，总是不满足。但我们可曾想过，世界上还有许许多多贫困的孩子，正面对着失去亲人，漂泊流浪的生活，或许是面对辍学的困境和挨饿的局面。他们充满着对生活的热爱，憧憬着明亮的教室，向往着可口的食物或者是保暖的衣服。面对这些渴望生活的贫困的孩子，我们能视而不见吗?能袖手旁观吗?当我读到狄更斯笔下的贫民院孤儿的生活时，我的头脑中总会闪现出在电视上看到的非洲难民的画面。旧社会贫民的生活是贫困的，挨饿受冻是很平常的事情，而在21世纪里，在这个文明的时代，饥饿、恐惧、挨冻依然存在。在看到奥立佛被虐待，被殴打的情节里，我又不时地联想到了常常在大街上看到的那些卖艺和乞讨的孩子。听说这些衣衫褴褛的孩子们也是误入了一个黑帮组织，不管是卖艺得到的钱还是乞讨而得到的钱，硬或是偷来的钱，也要上交他们的“头儿”。这就是文明的社会吗?那些孩子的命运，他们的生活，和狄更斯笔下的孤儿奥立佛的生活又有什么区别呢?奥立佛是幸运的，能够遇到善良的人。而在现实社会中那些误入不明组织的孩子们，他们的命运会怎样，能够遇到好心人吗?我想不会的，他们的结局或许是像这部作品中的南茜那样，或者是饿死、病死。这也是这个所谓的文明社会的必然结果。社会越是进步，人类越是文明，那些不良分子也就越猖狂，而不幸误入他们手中的孩子们命运就越悲惨。所以，我们更需要用爱心去帮助那些在困境中的人们，帮助他们摆脱困境，迎来幸福的生活。

这部作品让我联想到许多现实生活中的情景，对我触动很大。现在，我倒要回过头来看看狄更斯的艺术魅力和写作才能。狄更斯是维多利亚时代批判现实主义的代表人物，在写这部作品时他还是个青年，这时的他希望运用他的小说改革社会，但他对社会的了解还不够深刻，对当时的统治阶级还寄托着美好的希望。在这部作品中也充分体现了他的这种思想。通常情况下，在优秀的现实主义小说中，故事情节往往是在特定环境作用下的人物性格发展史，即高尔基所说的“某种性格典型的成长和构成的历史”。然而，狄更斯不同，他不拘任何格套，想要多少巧合就安排多少巧合。如奥立佛第一次跟小偷上街被掏兜的就是他亡父生前的好友布朗鲁先生;他在盗贼第二首领赛克斯的劫持下入室行窃被偷的恰巧是他的亲姨妈露丝·梅里家;还有，他去送信时因匆忙而撞到的人竟然就是他的哥哥蒙克斯，并在这一相撞中就让蒙克斯感到他就是自己要寻找的弟弟。这一连串的巧合在情理上无论如何是说不过去的，然而，狄更斯自有丰富的想象和巧妙的构思，在具体的情节描写中充满着生活气息和激情，使读者在阅读时紧张得喘不过气来，对这种本来是牵强的，不自然的情节也不得不信以为真，而且对此产生莫大的兴趣，迫不及待地往下阅读。这就是狄更斯的艺术世界魅力。此外，从政治角度来讲，这部作品提出了孤儿的社会地位这个非常现实的问题，以及和这个问题直接相关的官员的素质问题，社会上一些违法组织问题以及在各阶层的人们的心理倾向和精神疾病长问题。狄更斯虽然提出了这些问题，但他所想到的解决这些问题的方式是不现实的。这也是因为青年时期的他对社会还没有深刻的了解。而随着他的社会阅历的丰富，对社会的了解也更深，他的思想也慢慢地成熟，这在他以后地作品中就能体现出来。狄更斯运用他广阔深刻的语言给予读者的有时是开怀大笑，有时是会意的微笑，有时却是流泪的痛苦的笑或是无奈的麻木的笑。然而，无论是哪一种笑，都给予了资本主义社会的无尽的讽刺。

我用急不可待的心情读完了这部作品，吸引我的不仅是作品中设置的层层悬念，还有狄更斯绝伦的艺术魅力，而我收获的是无尽的感慨。

《雾都孤儿》写于《济贫法》通过之时。英国正经历一场转变，从一个农业和农村经济向城市和工业国家的转变。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’， he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’， they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’

Here I am sitting on a couch alone thinking about what I have just finished reading with tears of sadness filling my eyes and fire of indignation filling my heart which revived my exhausted soul that has already been covered by the cruelty and the selfishness of the secular world for a long time. It is truly what I felt after reading Oliver Twist written by the prominent British author Charles Dickens.

The resonance between me and the book makes me feel not only the kindness and the wickedness of all the characters in the novel but what this aloof society lacks and what I lack deep inside. These supreme resources I’m talking about right now are somewhat different from minerals oil that we usually mention. They’re abstract like feelings and some kinds of spiritual stimulation that all of us desire anxiously from one another —— love and care.

Those charitable figures whom Dickens created in the novel are really what we need in life. They showed love and care to others just as the gentle rain from the sky fell upon the earth which was carved into my heart deeply.

Mr. Brownlow is one such person.

The other day he had one of his elaborate watches stolen by two skilled teenage thieves Artful Dodger and Charley Bates and thought naturally it was Oliver who was an orphan and forced to live with a gang of thieves that had done it because he was the only one near by after the theft had taken place. Being wrathful he caught Oliver and sent him to the police station where the ill-tempered unfair magistrates worked. Fortunately for him Oliver was proved innocent by one onlooker afterwards. With sympathy Mr. Brownlow took the injured poor Oliver to his own home. There Oliver lived freely and gleefully for some months as if he were Mr. Brownlow’s own son. One day however Mr. Brownlow asked Oliver to return some books to the bookseller and to send some money for the new books that he had already collected. The thief Oliver once stayed with kidnapped him. After that he disappeared in Mr. Brownlow’s life. Searching for a while Mr. Brownlow had to believe the fact that he had run away with his money. But dramatically they came across each other again a few years later. Without hesitation Mr. Brownlow took Oliver home for the second time not caring if he had done something evil.

Perhaps most of us would feel confused about Mr. Brownlow’s reaction. But as a matter of fact this is just the lesson we should learn from him. Jesus said in the Bible. “Forgive not seven times but seventy-times seven.” Why is that? Because forgiveness is our ability to remove negative thoughts and neutralize them so our energy may be spent on doing what we came here for. We cannot move forward in our future if past issues cloud our thinking. Stop put Mr. Brownlow into the list of your models. Always give people a second chance no matter what they might have done. That’s also a substantial part of loving and caring others.

Then there are Mrs. Maylie and Rose Oliver’s other benefactors. Maybe the reason they loved and cared Oliver was not because of forgiveness. In my point of view it was trust. They had faith in Oliver when he was considered to be a filthy burglar who tried to break the front door of Maylie’s at midnight. But this wasn’t how these two ladies saw the whole thing. They denied Oliver’s crime immediately and listened attentively to Oliver’s own description of his miserable life. They were deeply touched by Oliver’s strong perseverance and astonishing vitality. Accordingly they remedied Oliver’s body and heart and turned him into a different boy. He began to wear appropriate and clean suits which were tailor-made for him and receive education.

As far as we can see it is trust that helps us all live together without precaution. Sometimes trust can even lead us to miracles which we often expect to come about so why not trust? Trust yourself trust others and you’ll salute miracles every single day.

In the novel though the young Oliver again and again fell for conspiracies of those hideous thieves who tried to torture Oliver’s body and poisoned Oliver’s heart intensely he always lived on and tried hard to seek for his own life. Then I realized what supported him all through were actually beliefs. In most cases what you believe is what you’ll become. Believe that you are unlimited that you can do anything you commit to doing and when you do your accomplishments will know no bounds. You control your beliefs and that is how you ultimately control your life. It’s all dictated by your attitude.

In the final analysis love and care contain numerous forms there are love of forgiveness love of trust etc. but they all come from your beliefs in life. When someone tells you he’s deceived you forgive him anyway when someone tells you what he’s done trust him anyway and when you face adversities while chasing your dreams think about your beliefs then what hinders you will become a piece of cake in no time.

So find out “Olivers” in your life and do as Mr. Brownlow and Mrs. Maylie do: love them and care them which cost nothing but save much. They enrich those who receive without impoverishing those who give. They can be certain smallest words or actions but the memory of them sometimes last forever.

Charles Dickens said:“Love makes the world go around.” These immortal words have inspired and will keep on inspiring us to chant the melody of love and to say the prayer of care forevermore. Let us therefore enjoy life and treat other people lovingly. These principles are the roots and foundations of beliefs supporting this article and our mission together.

最近读了英国作家查尔斯•狄更斯写的《雾都孤儿》，这是我今年读书计划的第一本书。我随着本书故事情节的不断深入而迷醉在里面，为狄更斯那幽默、富有想象力的写作技能禁不住地不停地啧啧称羡。

首先狄更斯爱憎分明，对奥利弗•退斯特的成长经历给予了无限的同情，对邦布尔先生的官僚作风，对贼首老犹太——费金的阴毒嘴脸……给予了无情地揭露和鞭挞。一切看上去又是那么顺理成章——罪恶总将毁灭，善良总将有好报!

本书的书名叫做《雾都孤儿》，很显然小说应该围绕着奥利弗•退斯特这个孤儿来写。可我看到后面，却看不到奥利弗•退斯特的出现场次，相反越看到后面越是更多的出现了正、反人物的正面较量。以布朗罗先生、露丝小姐为代表的正面人物在南希小姐的通风报信帮助下，一举将贼首费金、两号人物赛克斯一网打尽。这和看到这篇小说的广大读者的心愿是完全吻合的，我一边看一边希望那些可恶的人物能够尽快消失掉。狄更斯满足了我的愿望——让赛克斯的脖子被一条绳子的活扣套住而气绝身死，让老犹太走上绞刑台，走完他丑恶的一生。应该说小说着力要表达的并不完全是奥利弗•退斯特的可怕遭遇，相反小说着力要表达的恰恰是作者自己的良好愿望——善必将战胜恶，正义的阳光必将普照大地!而奥利弗•退斯特在其中只不过起到一个正反双方进行交手的连接点的作用，这是我个人的看法。

一个孤儿带着他懵懂的眼睛来到了这个世界上，通过其不幸的遭遇揭露出人性的光芒和丑陋，善良和残忍。在经过了苦痛，在善良人的帮助下，小奥利弗•退斯特才走上了正常的人生轨道，这或许告诉我们这样的一个真理——社会有时并不如我们想像得那样美好，光明和黑暗，善良和残暴，宽容和野蛮如一对孪生兄弟一样，将会永远相互抗衡——既相互依存又互相对立着发展下去。

朋友们!睁大你雪亮的眼睛，看清楚这个你身边最真实、最丰富、最迷茫的社会现状吧!

最后需要说明的是，《雾都孤儿》这部小说肯定还有我的理解能力达不到的地方，这需要我继续研读本书内容，并结合我的社会实践，总结、挖掘出更多狄更斯在这部小说中所要表达的意思来，愿与广大的狄更斯迷共勉!

《雾都孤儿》这本书讲的是主人翁奥利弗尔·退斯特是在济贫院里出生，后来在弃婴堂里生活了九年，然后又被警官带回济贫院，像奴隶一样拍卖，最后被棺材店老板领走，过了一个月左右，奥利弗尔·退斯特独自前往伦敦，在路上遇到一个小偷，之后他就进入了贼窝。后来，有一次偷窃活动，他的同伙把一个老先生的包抢走了，奥利弗尔·退斯特被抓住了，奥利弗尔·退斯特向老先生说了自己的处境，然后这个老先生就收留了他。让他过上了一段幸福美好的时光。有一次，他去给人送钱，半路被那同一个贼劫去，被参加一次入室抢劫，被子弹击中，抢劫失败后，半路被扔在路边。第二天，被被抢劫的那一家救去。最后，主人翁的两家联合，还有警察，用正义力量击败贼窝。

这本书让我懂得了世界上存在的邪恶比正义多，最终正义能击败邪恶。

It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday’s.” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday.

Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it…to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced, sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday) went to him (Friday’s father), he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.

Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island” as he called it. I feel that Robinson’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.

Befoe had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.

《雾都孤儿》这本世界名著无情地揭露了资本主义社会的虚伪、冷酷、残暴，也描写了主人公儿时的悲惨以及成年后的改变……

主人公奥利弗刚出生就失去了妈妈，在寒冷的冬夜之中流落街头，无家可归。随后，他被人们送进了贫民习艺所——一个及其黑暗的地方，孩子们在这，都要不停地干活，直到死亡……

童年时的奥利弗就是生活在这样一个残酷黑暗的地方，饱受折磨、饱受虐待，可年幼的他，无力反抗……

在他逐渐成长后，奥利弗遇到了一位贵人——一位彬彬有礼、心地善良、饱读诗书的布朗罗先生。布朗罗看奥利弗有着善良的本性，面对困难不屈服、不软弱、不低头、不弯腰的精神，于是，布朗罗收留了可怜的他。

是布朗罗先生伸出了援助之手，让奥利弗远离了污浊可怕的黑暗世界，让奥利弗学会帮助别人，最后，让奥利弗下了决心——一定要成为一个无比优秀的人……

读完《雾都孤儿》，我深深地感受到人性的扭曲与社会的虚伪，与此同时，也感受到主人公那种不向命运低头、不屈服于命运安排的精神。

不管世界有多么肮脏，只要你的心灵是纯洁的，就好。

《雾都孤儿》是本世界名著，它讲述的是发生在19世纪的一个动人的故事。书中的主人翁奥利弗·特威斯特是一个孤儿，他的童年是在济贫院里度过的。因不堪忍受棺材铺老板娘的压迫，他向伦敦逃去。路上，他遇上了一个外号机灵鬼的人，把他骗进了贼窝，在两次偷盗中，他都遇到了好人，把他留在家里抚养，但又一次次的被抓回去。由于南西的良心发现，告诉了他偶然听到的一个秘密，说他的同父异母哥哥为了财产，要杀他，于是向警察告密，逮捕了贼窝的人，但出于同情，奥里弗放过了他的哥哥。奥里弗的灾难终于结束了，他被第一次的偷窃对象——那位老绅士收为义子。奥里弗这才知道，他以前偷窃两个对象竟然是他父亲的好友和他的亲姨妈。

奥利佛虽然在黑暗的习艺所里饱尝了生活的艰辛，但是并没有给这么一个美好的心灵蒙上灰尘。由于饥饿他向干事提出需要一碗稀粥时，被那些干事认为“这孩子将来一定会被绞死”。在当学徒的时候他面对人们对于他母亲的羞辱，奋起反抗。也许是由于初生牛犊不怕虎，竭尽全力反抗着。后来逃亡到伦敦后，纯洁的心灵让人们感到可笑。其中有一段话让我记忆尤深“那些都是老先生的，在我还热病快死掉的时候，是那位好心的先生把我带到他家里去，照看我养好了病。哦，求求你们把这些都送回去吧，把书和钱还给他。你们要我一辈子待在这儿都可以，我只求你们把这些东西送回去，不然他们应定会以为我逃跑了的，你们可怜可怜我，把书和钱送回去吧”这是小奥利弗被抓后说的话。他那种维护尊严的行为深深打动了我。是啊，一个人活着就要有尊严!

整部小说曲折惊险，让人不仅为奥里弗的身世叹息，对资产阶级和坏人的愤怒，被善良人所感动，为奥里弗最后幸福的生活而高兴。而使奥里弗逃离魔爪起最大作用的三个人物，两个是在两次奥里弗陷入危难时，没有计较他偷了东西，而是十分同情他，并帮助了他的老绅士和他父亲的老朋友。

而另一个是南西，她虽然是贼窝的一分子，但她没有被肮脏的环境染黑了心，她知道悔改，知道去怜悯一个孤儿，这说明她的本质是善良的。南希最后死了，但正因为她的死才召唤出惊天动地的社会正义力量，正是她的死，注定了邪恶势力的代表——费金团伙的灭顶之灾。

奥利弗、老绅士、他父亲的老朋友包括南希都是善良的代表，他们都出生于苦难之中，在黑暗和充满罪恶的世界中成长，但在他们的心中始终保持着一片纯洁的天地，始终有着一颗善良的心，种种磨难并没有使他们堕落，反而更显示出了他们坚强、圣洁、出淤泥而不染的高贵品质。也正因为他们几个的同情，奥里弗才得救，也因为他们充满爱的帮助，使世界上少了一个受苦的孩子、少了一个窃贼，又多了一个善良的人。如果世上的人都想他们一样富有同情心的话，便不会有受苦的人，不会有那么多被社会所抛弃的人，更不会有被生活所迫而从事犯罪的人。

读完这本书，我心中久久不能平息。可怜的奥利弗，在已经失去家人的痛苦下还受到这么多折磨。真不知道他瘦弱的躯体下，有着怎样的意志，能使他坚持不懈，使他在饥饿、寒冷、孤独、痛苦下顽强的斗争，向美好生活前进!

我们生活在密罐里，福窝里，却总是抱怨，总是不满足。但我们可曾经想过，在世界上，还有多少孩子，正承受着巨大的痛苦;正在和饥饿、疾病作战;正面对着失去亲人，漂泊流浪的生活。他们充满着对生命的渴望，对生命的热爱，可是苦难和他们作对。所以，我们现在要珍惜自己的幸福，用我们的双手和大脑，做一个对祖国有用的人，来回报社会。

奥利弗——一个孤儿，他被投入了一个充满贫困与犯罪的世界，忍饥挨饿，挨打挨

骂，从来没有人关心他。邪恶的费金，残暴的比尔?赛克斯，以及一大群窃贼强盗。他们把奥利弗训练成一个神偷手，然后利用他去骗取钱财。可是奥利弗不愿去干这些事情，

费金就对他拳打脚踢，迫使奥利弗到处流浪。幸运的是，他遇到了一群善良的人，对他无微不至的关怀，让奥利弗感到非常温暖。

当我想到一个九岁的孩子，在伦敦被迫加入罪恶累累、堕落不堪的小偷、强盗、亡命之徒的行列之中。但他并未放弃，在他的心中仍向往着一个美好的生活，多次在好心人的帮助下，终于过上了自己所想往的生活。我真觉得奥利弗真勇敢、真坚强。

而我们生活在蜜罐里，福窝里，却总是抱怨，总是不满足。但我们可曾想过，在世界上，还有许多孩子，正承受着巨大的痛苦；正和饥饿、寒冷、疾病作战；正面对着失去亲人，飘泊流浪的生活。他们需要别人的帮助，但更需要不屈的精神、勇敢的精神。

我要学习奥利弗的坚强不屈的精神、勇敢的精神。我们也要学习善良的布朗洛，是他伸出了援助之手帮助奥利弗的。

看了《雾都孤儿》，让我受益非浅，让我懂得了社会的冷酷与人的性格的残暴。我们要行动，帮助他们，挽救他们。

我向大家推荐的书是这《雾都孤儿》，这里面突出了一个典型人物，可怜、凄惨、悲苦的南希，她生活在一个残忍的世界中，却挣扎着要忠实于她所爱的人。她为了帮助奥利弗，而背叛了她所爱的人，最后遭到了坏人的毒手……经过这一连串的事奥利弗却坚强不屈，勇于斗争，所以我向大家推荐这本书。

《雾都孤儿》中主人公的英文名字为Oliver Twist，而Twist其英文意思是“扭曲，曲折，使苦恼”，这暗示着主人公Oliver的一生很坎坷，要经历很多的痛苦。在这个对社会进行抗议的情节剧式的小说中，奥利弗被当作一个主人公，其目的不是要触动我们的文学敏感性，而是要打动我们的情感。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse.

While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end.

One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness.

I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

狄更斯通过《雾都孤儿》塑造了小奥利弗的形象，整部小说揭露各种丑陋的嘴脸及残酷的社会现实，表现了《雾都孤儿》难能可贵的仁爱思想。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

One of Dickens most enduringly popular stories is Oliver Twist, an early work published 1837-8. Like many of his later novels, its central theme is the hardship faced by the dispossessed and those of the outside of tolite society. Oliver himself is born in a workhouse and treated cruelly there as was the norm at the time for pauper children, in particular by Bumble, a parish council official or eadle The story follows Oliver as he escapes the workhouse and runs away to London.

Here he receives an education in villainy from the criminal gang of Fagin that includes the brutal thief Bill Sikes, the famous artful Dodger and Nancy, Bill whore. Oliver is rescued by the intervention of a benefactor - Mr Brownlow - but the mysterious Monks gets the gang to kidnap the boy again. Nancy intervenes but is murdered viciously by Sikes after she has showed some redeeming qualities and has discovered Monk sinister intention.

The story closes happily and with justice for Bumble and the cruel Monks who has hidden the truth of Oliver parentage out of malice. Accusations were made that the book glamorised crime (like the ewgate Group of the period) but Dickens wisely disassociated himself from criminal romances. His achievement was in fact in presenting the underworld and problems of poverty to the well-off in a way rarely attempted previously.

最近，我看了一部书，书名叫《雾都孤儿》。正如书名一样，这是一部描写苦难的书。看完这本书后，我的心情久久不能平静下来，我被主人公的每一个事件深深地牵动着。

书中讲述了一个孤儿悲惨的身世及遭遇。主人公奥里弗在孤儿院长大，他的童年过着吃不饱、穿不暖的生活。后来他被送到了一个棺材店里当学徒，但因不能老板娘的侮辱，他后来含恨而走，可是却又误入贼窝，被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，他曾被善良的布朗罗先收留，但是又被凶徒带走，扒手们策划让他做一个小偷，但他不失善良本色，于是一次抢劫被成功阻止，奥利弗被冷枪击中。幸亏同行的一位小偷救下了他。之后，奥利弗历尽无数辛酸，最后被善良的女扒手营救。奥利弗终于得以与亲人团聚。但南希却被贼窝头目杀害了。警察之后围剿了贼窝。读完后，我既为奥利弗获得幸福而高兴，又为南希最后的死去而悲伤。可见小说内容曲折，让读者眼界大开。同时小说中的情节更让我感触很多：他在这里度过的幼年是那样的阴暗，始终没有一句亲切的话语或是一道亲切的眼光照亮过。““眼泪即顺着奥利弗的脸颊滴了下来，跟着一是滴，接着泪水连成了一条线”，“这孩子拼命想忍住泪水，却怎么也止不住，他索性双手捂住面孔，泪珠从他那纤细的手指头缝里汹涌泻出……”像这样的描写还有很多，每一个词语都深深地打动了我。想想我们的童年有着父母最亲切的爱，我们生活在蜜罐里一样。但是有时我们却仍不满足，时常的发些脾气。读完这本小说，我的眼泪不知流了多少次，但最后终于苦尽甜来。小说描写了善与恶，美与丑，正义与邪恶的斗争，赞扬了人们天性中的正直与善良。书中善良的人很多，正是因为有了他们，才使得奥利弗得到了温暖，是他们让一个孤儿不再受苦，同时奥里弗也没有向侮辱屈服，折磨也没有改变他那善良的本性，这也是小说的一个闪耀点。

读了这部小说后，让我受益匪浅。让我看到了社会的冷酷和人的性格之分，让我读懂了奥里弗不弯腰、不低头的精神和那善良的本性。