英语读后感通用20篇

暑假里老师给我们推荐了一本叫《父与子》的书。一看到书的标题我心里很纳闷，是不是老师弄错书名了，平时老师都叫我们看的都是名著或散文这一类的。这次破天荒怎么叫我们看一本漫画书。但转眼又暗喜，还真的谢谢老师推荐这么好的书。因为这是一本老少皆宜的漫画书。它出自德国漫画大师埃·卜劳恩之手。

一拿到书后我被书的画面深深吸引了。虽然里面没有文字表达，但那一幅幅有趣的画面，让我更了解里面的内容。

书中描写了一个头发短胡子长幽默搞笑的父亲和一个长头发喜欢搞恶作剧淘气可爱的儿子之间发生的一系列事情。

父亲非常幽默，也有一点严格，偶尔也有一点傻傻的。儿子即淘气又可爱的有时很聪明。比如有一次儿子的作业上课时不认真听，于是作业就全部写错。之后老师就让全体家长签字，签字的目的是为了让家长知道儿子在学校的学习情况。但聪明的儿子知道如果作业拿去让父亲签名的话，肯定会被父亲骂的。于是他想了一个和父亲玩签字的游戏。规则先让对方蒙着眼睛签字，于是儿子就趁父亲签字的时侯把作业打开，这样他父亲名字就不自不觉的签在了作业本上了。而儿子也过了“家长签字鬼门关”。

这样的故事很多很多。他们很勇敢。一天晚上，他们刚刚要睡觉，结果就碰见了一个圆头鬼，鬼一看到父子俩就想去吓他们。可他们并没有被吓倒。儿子反而冲了上去，把那个鬼的踢飞了。鬼立马捡起头，然后惨败而逃。

可对我而言我就胆小多了。记得有一次我去宋城，兴冲冲的来到“鬼屋”，但在门口排了整整排了一个多小时，当轮到我进去时，我的脚好像被什么东西拴住了似的挪也梛不开。由此可见我是一个多么胆小的人。

看了这本书，我也很想做一回书中的小主人公，因为这样可以无忧无虑的和父亲玩耍还有不被因为有太多作业所困绕。而有一个快乐幸福的童年。

《红楼梦》经过四大家族由胜而衰的过程和贾宝玉、林黛玉的感情杯具，展现了一段错综复杂的家族兴衰史，揭示了封建末世的人间百态。

其中元春省亲、宝钗扑蝶、黛玉葬花等经典情节，充满了诗情画意，被广为传诵;所塑造的多愁善感的林黛玉、聪明灵秀的贾宝玉、稳重端庄的薛宝钗等很多人物，形象丰满，风采各异。曲折生动的故事情节令人抚怀感叹，个性鲜明的人物形象令人永远难忘。

透过他们的人生遭遇，看到的不仅仅是一场场悲欢离合、命运浮沉的人生大戏，更是一部封建社会的百科全书。书中的人物之多、场面之盛，在中国古典小说创作史上是空前绝后的。

掩卷沉思，泪水长流。宝玉和黛玉杯具式的结果，让我感怀不已。可冷静思考，生活在封建社会的他们，结果自然是注定的。想到自我，成长在一个日新月异的完美新社会里，生活在一个幸福美满的和谐大家庭里，我要珍惜来之不易的机会，坚持浓厚的学习兴趣，持之以恒地刻苦学习、增强本领，用最优异的成绩去拥抱完美的未来!

暑假里我看了马克吐温著的《威尼斯的小艇》，其中短篇小说《百万英镑》是一部很好的作品，读了它使我感触很深。

《百万英镑》是讲一个贫穷、诚实的人，也就是这个故事的主人公收到了一对兄弟的信，信里装着百万英镑。原来这对兄弟打了一个赌，赌如果一个贫穷、诚实的人收到天上掉下的一百万英镑，他会有怎样的结果?哥哥认为他会饿死，因为他无法证明这些钱是他自己的，而且会受到别人的怀疑，就连银行都不会让他存钱。弟弟却认为他会过得很好。于是他们兄弟俩将一百万英镑的支票借给了这个贫穷又诚实又聪明的人，并出国呆了一个月。没想到在这段时间里，人们对这位突然暴富的罕见富翁，竟拼命地拉拢他，从免费吃饭，买衣服，到免费住宿，一个个像乞丐一样讨好他，并不断提高他的社会地位，一直到了除王室外最高的公爵之上!不光如此，他还得到了一位好妻子和三万英镑的银行利息，最后还从两兄弟那儿得到了一份很好的工作，过着非常非常幸福的生活。

看到这儿，我很羡慕这位如此“幸运”的主人公，真希望能和他一样幸运，但我又转念一想：人们之所以讨好他，还不是因为当时人们太看重金钱了吗?拜金主义是可耻的，不劳而获更不应该!金钱不是万能的，世界上还有许多比金钱更重要的东西——良心和品德……

When I was a middle school student, I’ve finished this book in Chinese.But when I read it in English,I really gain something new both in the way of expression and the spirit it shows to us.May be different ages to read the same book we will learn different things from it.At least, for my part, that is true.

Firstly,I would like to review some information about this book.Such as the background,major characters and the topic of it.

The Old Man and the Sea is a story by Ernest Hemingway, written in Cuba in 1951 and published in 1952. It was the last major work of fiction to be produced by Hemingway and published in his lifetime. One of his most famous works, it centers upon Santiago, an aging Cuban fisherman who struggles with a giant marlin far out in the Gulf Stream.

The Old Man and the Sea served to reinvigorate Hemingways literary reputation and prompted a reexamination of his entire body of work. The novella was initially received with much popularity; it restored many readers confidence in Hemingways capability as an author. Its publisher, Scribners, on an early dust jacket, called the novella a "new classic," and many critics favorably compared it with such works as William Faulkners "The Bear" and Herman Melvilles Moby-Dick.

This book gives me a deep impression especially the description about the man’s braveness and persistence.

In this book, in order to suggest the profundity of the old man’s sacrifice and the glory that derives from it, Hemingway purposefully likens Santiago to Christ, who, according to Christian theology, gave his life for the greater glory of humankind. Crucifixion imagery is the most noticeable way in which Hemingway creates the symbolic parallel between Santiago and Christ. When Santiago’s palms are first cut by his fishing line, the reader cannot help but think of Christ suffering his stigmata. Later, when the sharks arrive, Hemingway portrays the old man as a crucified martyr, saying that he makes a noise similar to that of a man having nails driven through his hands. Furthermore, the image of the old man struggling up the hill with his mast across his shoulders recalls Christ’s march toward Calvary. Even the position in which Santiago collapses on his bed—face down with his arms out straight and the palms of his hands up—brings to mind the image of Christ suffering on the cross. Hemingway employs these images in the final pages of the novella in order to link Santiago to Christ, who exemplified transcendence by turning loss into gain, defeat into triumph, and even death into renewed life.

The major characters in this book are also vivid and lively.

Santiago?,the old man of the novella’s title, Santiago is a Cuban fisherman who has had an extended run of bad luck. Despite his expertise, he has been unable to catch a fish for eighty-four days. He is humble, yet exhibits a justified pride in his abilities. His knowledge of the sea and its creatures, and of his craft, is unparalleled and helps him preserve a sense of hope regardless of circumstance.

The marlin?,Santiago hooks the marlin, which we learn at the end of the novella measures eighteen feet, on the first afternoon of his fishing expedition. Manolin?,a boy presumably in his adolescence, Manolin is Santiago’s apprentice and devoted attendant. The old man first took him out on a boat when he was merely five years old. Due to Santiago’s recent bad luck, Manolin’s parents have forced the boy to go out on a different fishing boat. Manolin, however, still cares deeply for the old man, to whom he continues to look as a mentor.

Joe DiMaggio, although DiMaggio never appears in the novel, he plays a significant role nonetheless. Santiago worships him as a model of strength and commitment, and his thoughts turn toward DiMaggio whenever he needs to reassure himself of his own strength. Perico ?,Perico, the reader assumes, owns the bodega in Santiago’s village. He never appears in the novel, but he serves an important role in the fisherman’s life by providing him with newspapers that report the baseball scores. This act establishes him as a kind man who helps the aging Santiago.

Martin,like Perico, Martin, a café owner in Santiago’s village, does not appear in the story. The reader learns of him through Manolin, who often goes to Martin for Santiago’s supper. As the old man says, Martin is a man of frequent kindness who deserves to be repaid.

From the very first paragraph, Santiago is characterized as someone struggling against defeat. He has gone eighty-four days without catching a fish—he will soon pass his own record of eighty-seven days. Almost as a reminder of Santiago’s struggle, the sail of his skiff resembles “the flag of permanent defeat.” But the old man refuses defeat at every turn: he resolves to sail out beyond the other fishermen to where the biggest fish promise to be. He lands the marlin, tying his record of eighty-seven days after a brutal three-day fight, and he continues to ward off sharks from stealing his prey, even though he knows the battle is useless.

Because Santiago is pitted against the creatures of the sea, some readers choose to view the tale as a chronicle of man’s battle against the natural world, but the novella is, more accurately, the story of man’s place within nature. Both Santiago and the marlin display qualities of pride, honor, and bravery, and both are subject to the same eternal law: they must kill or be killed. As Santiago reflects when he watches the weary warbler fly toward shore, where it will inevitably meet the hawk, the world is filled with predators, and no living thing can escape the inevitable struggle that will lead to its death. Santiago lives according to his own observation: “man is not made for defeat . . . [a] man can be destroyed but not defeated.” In Hemingway’s portrait of the world, death is inevitable, but the best men (and animals) will nonetheless refuse to give in to its power. Accordingly, man and fish will struggle to the death, just as hungry sharks will lay waste to an old man’s trophy catch.

The novel suggests that it is possible to transcend this natural law. In fact, the very inevitability of destruction creates the terms that allow a worthy man or beast to transcend it. It is precisely through the effort to battle the inevitable that a man can prove himself. Indeed, a man can prove this determination over and over through the worthiness of the opponents he chooses to face. Santiago finds the marlin worthy of a fight, just as he once found “the great negro of Cienfuegos” worthy. HSantiago, though destroyed at the end of the novella, is never defeated. Instead, he emerges as a hero. Santiago’s struggle does not enable him to change man’s place in the world. Rather, it enables him to meet his most dignified destiny.

While it is certainly true that Santiago’s eighty-four-day run of bad luck is an affront to his pride as a masterful fisherman, and that his attempt to bear out his skills by sailing far into the gulf waters leads to disaster, Hemingway does not condemn his protagonist for being full of pride. On the contrary, Santiago stands as proof that pride motivates men to greatness. Because the old man acknowledges that he killed the mighty marlin largely out of pride, and because his capture of the marlin leads in turn to his heroic transcendence of defeat, pride becomes the source of Santiago’s greatest strength. Without a ferocious sense of pride, that battle would never have been fought, or more likely, it would have been abandoned before the end.

Santiago’s pride also motivates his desire to transcend the destructive forces of nature. Throughout the novel, no matter how baleful his circumstances become, the old man exhibits an unflagging determination to catch the marlin and bring it to shore. When the first shark arrives, Santiago’s resolve is mentioned twice in the space of just a few paragraphs. Even if the old man had returned with the marlin intact, his moment of glory, like the marlin’s meat, would have been short-lived. The glory and honor Santiago accrues comes not from his battle itself but from his pride and determination to fight.

Santiago dreams his pleasant dream of the lions at play on the beaches of Africa three times. The first time is the night before he departs on his three-day fishing expedition, the second occurs when he sleeps on the boat for a few hours in the middle of his struggle with the marlin, and the third takes place at the very end of the book. In fact, the sober promise of the triumph and regeneration with which the novella closes is supported by the final image of the lions. Because Santiago associates the lions with his youth, the dream suggests the circular nature of life. Additionally, because Santiago imagines the lions, fierce predators, playing, his dream suggests a harmony between the opposing forces—life and death, love and hate, destruction and regeneration—of nature.

This book gives me courage of conquering all kinds of difficulties .And I have the belief that the most beautiful thing is the process that we make our best to achieve our dream,and never say give up .

在《红楼梦》第十三章——《秋爽斋结海棠诗社》中，我知道了大观园中各姐妹平日里都喜欢写诗作乐，看见一些新奇的东西就忍不住吟诗。但是从林黛玉的《咏菊》、《问菊》、《菊梦》这三首诗中，我又可以知道林黛玉并不只是一个喜欢哭泣的女孩，还是一个才华横溢的女孩。这使我有点佩服她聪明过人。

在本书第十六章——《慧紫鹃试探宝玉情》中我知道了聪明的紫鹃想让黛玉和宝玉的这门婚事早办成，就发挥了她的聪明才智，用一句假话去试探宝玉。宝玉却将假话信以为真，就很伤心。看来，我预料的没错——宝玉对黛玉的情是真心的，没有半点假意。

宝玉这种纯真的爱深深地打动了我，看了后，我非常激动，不知不觉热泪盈眶，久久不能忘怀。

暑假的时候，我看了丹麦作家安徒生的一篇优美童话——《丑小鸭》。

丑小鸭非常可怜，一生下来便很丑，所以人们都称它“丑小鸭”，母鸭妈妈嫌恶它，兄弟姐妹们常常嘲笑它，森林里的动物都奚落它。寒冷的冬天到了，鹅毛般的大雪纷纷扬扬的飘落着，别的动物都有一个温暖的家，可丑小鸭却没有，多少次几乎被冻死------

但它勇敢的站了起来，它顽强的跳跳呀，飞呀，尽管一次次失败，但它仍然坚持着，最后，丑小鸭终于飞了起来，而且它在湖中看到了一只美丽的天鹅，这只天鹅自由地飞翔在湛蓝的天空，它就是人们以前奚落的丑小鸭!

teacher’ pain, and can see that HuoDa trembled her pen when she wrote here .

Many muslims are firmly opposed to muslims and non-muslims in love, marriage, or even because of this, they take it for granted to oppose the hui and the han nationality.But obviously, they confuse the relationship between ethnic and religious beliefs, so they cause many tragedies. There are many students around me.They love deeply with each other, but because of the nation the opposition in the home, and become tragedies one after another .All of them are the protagonist in the novel.

In addition, I want to express some of my personal opinion. Although the national unity, although I am a Muslim, I want to tell everyone clearly that many muslims are becoming more and more stupid, more and more extremism.There is a sense of superiority in their innate character , thinking they are better than any other nations. They always try their best to find the faults of others, to criticize others, what is hated most. Real islamic culture has been twisted, and what they present to others is more of a brutal, violent, radical, split. That is why a classic literature has been criticized .

“作者的想象力在神游翱翔：荒诞不经的传说，具体的村镇生活，比拟与影射，细腻的景物描写，都以新闻报道般的准确性再现出来。”——诺贝尔文学奖的颁奖词。

哥伦比亚当代作家加西亚·马尔克斯的名字是与“魔幻现实主义”联系在一起的，但展现其高超的魔幻现实手法的则属《百年孤独》，此作品使马尔克斯走上了1982年诺贝尔文学奖的领奖台，从此奠定了其在拉美魔幻现实主义文学的地位。

仅仅书名而已，作者就已成功地把时间与空间的距离拉开，给人以遥远的感觉。作品以布恩蒂亚家族7代人的兴衰史见证了马孔多这个小镇的繁华与没落，直到小镇被一阵飓风吹走，从此世上再也没有马孔多，只留下百年的孤独。这一百年的时间跨度里，小镇上发生了很多离奇古怪的事情，而这些故事在马尔克斯疯狂的魔幻想象描绘下变得那么真实与讽刺。

政府把香蕉园三千名罢工者的尸体装上火车运到海边扔掉，那辆火车竟有200节车厢，前、中、后共有3个车头牵引;俏姑娘雷麦黛丝最后抓着雪白的床单升天而去;雷贝卡只要情绪失控就会贪婪地大吃泥土和墙上的石灰，并且拼命咂吮指头;布恩蒂亚家族的第七代传人最后被蚂蚁吃掉……在马尔克斯想象中的世界里，这些扑朔迷离的故事情节很多来自印第安神话、东方传说以及《圣经》典故。雷麦黛丝升天来源于阿拉伯神话《天方夜谭》;而马孔多一连下了四年零十一个月的大雨则是《圣经·创世纪》里有关洪水浩劫以及诺亚方舟故事的移植……充满想象力的情节看似荒诞，实质是作者对本土国家落后、封闭、缺乏现代性、边缘化的讽刺与担忧。“作为一个深深植根于本土、关心祖国人民命运、严肃反思本族历史的作家，他骨髓里浸染的本土化的东西使他能够始终站在拉美民族立场，发现民族被殖民化、被奴役，最终却仍被现代历史遗弃的命运。”于是，他站在现代历史的角度，洞见拉丁美洲的孤独。

那些看似发生在久远时代的故事如今读来却使人深思。马尔克斯在书末悲伤地感叹：“马孔多这个镜子似的(或者蜃景似的)城镇，将被飓风从地面上一扫而光，将从人们的记忆中彻底抹掉，羊皮纸手稿所记载的一切将永远不会重现，遭受百年孤独的家族，注定不会在大地上第二次出现了。”

于是，我想起了马尔克斯对诺贝尔文学奖的致答词：“对我们来说，最大的挑战是缺乏为了使生活变得令人可信而必需的常规财富，朋友们，这就是我们孤独的症结所在。”

在《三国演义》中，我最喜欢足智多谋的诸葛亮，草船借箭是他的壮举之一，令我挥之不去。一次，阴险狡诈的曹操派兵攻打东吴，用大船与他们交战，恰巧大雾弥漫。刘备的大军正缺箭，不过诸葛亮的机智帮了刘备的大忙。他让士兵们扎大量的稻草人安在船上，把船放到水中，每只船上点了几根火把，人站在船舱中。刚好大雾朦胧，曹军看不清，把箭全射到稻草人的身上。再把箭集中起来就可以用了。几天后，这些箭都被用来攻击曹军了。

真是大快人心。

《 Notre Dame cathedral》 is one known far and wide romantic faction  strength which Victor Hugo writes . I take advantage of this summer  vacation free time, read this great work.

Notre Dame cathedrals story, actually was one at that time social  epic poem, since brimmed with really.  Friendly.  Beautiful, also the  flow selfish desire and is false.  Regardless of is good beautiful Asmelada ,or has the ugly semblance, Cacimodo with one pure mind, they represent the great amount the  lower level populace which suppresses;  Perhaps is sinister Coloud, he is appears by the theocracy face, all load bearing one kind of  authors ponder.The author in this work, for with the clown, was beautifully friendly  and wickedly does the best annotation, or take above three people as  the example, the rebel Asmelada has the  beautiful semblance and the chaste good mind, as well as pitiful  destiny, but Cacimodo, he withstood destiny deceive  nicely, the innermost feelings is his misery is graver, but Coloud maintained the benighted social rights and interests, he had brutally. Void mind and evil passion.  Good person physique hateful, but the  evil person actually says the appearance shore however, bright set  off, social unfair manifest.

But the article result also is when the opposition society until  criticism:  All beautiful is good all swallows by the might and the  evil, the lower level peoples weak strength in under the king power  rule, in the benighted society, only can be reduced to ashes.  Was  palatial Notre Dame cathedral, how many world tragedy testimony once,  in Hugo the novel, he as if had the life breath, he sheltered Asmelada ,exposed Coloud the crime, regret the  populace attack the magnificent feat which dark actually heroically  devoted...

Another the question which is worth pondering is:  Who is the hero?  Asmelada or Cacimodo?  I  think all is not, but is in the article by the Louis 11 rank smell of  blood suppression rather for sacreficed the populace gate, Asmelada with Cacimodo is not in  them the representative, Asmelada is loves  with the beautiful symbol, Cacimodo not many represents is unfortunate  and the pain.  But they, all suffer a tragic middle ages ignorant evil forces devastate, one each one painful soul is bleeding, flows the  tear.  Merely is Notre Dame cathedrals above engraves " the destiny  "?  They are in middle ages France, despotism sacrificial victim.

The entire story rich tragic color, the plot intense is moving,  exciting.  Author Hugo through " Notre Dame cathedral " this story,  but also disclosed at that time the dark societys essence to the  people.  This fascinating story likes that Ccimodo clocks  sound equally shocks several generation of readers minds.

近期，我读了《岳飞传》，这本书是我看过的书中最好看了一本!

本书的主人公是岳飞，是这本书中英雄人物中的杰出代表。岳飞生活在距今一千多年的两宋之际，当时金兵南侵，北宋灭亡，中原大片土地沦丧，百姓深受其害。面对国家危亡，岳飞胸怀报国大志，毅然走上抗金大道，多次取得胜利，后来岳飞遭到奸臣陷害，蒙受不白之冤，屈死在风波亭上。这本书告诉我们，做人要正直，要善良。假如我是作者的话我就不会让岳飞死在秦桧、张邦昌那些大奸臣们的手掌上，我会让岳飞带兵打仗，征杀战场，收复中原的大好山河。

Duckling ", once again to the cygnet when one was young what experience sobs, feel sincere being glad to marvelous change of ugly duckling , just start a loving heart to self ugly child but feel to the ugly duckling mother. Ugly duckling in culture "is bitten by the duck , the group is pecked at by chicken, that woman servant person the poultry farm is kept watch on kicks, suffer hardships within winter". But, he had better been thinking of a heart being thankful all the time: "Oh, thank God! I be so ugly as to even hunting dog not have bitten me"! ; And, he is to be full of hopes all the time: "I go up to think that I still go to the extensive world well ". "I need to fly to them , fly to these elitist bird "! Behind reason why , setback having suffered innumerable time in him, he finally has become a swan from ugly duckling: "But he is that are one clumsy no longer, Oxford grays , the duck both ugly and make people dislike that, be one swan "! Thereupon, I have known: Face the setback that self suffers, we ought to have a heart being thankful to thank parents having given birth to us , thank nature giving us the chance existing down; We ought to all the time be full of hope that we need to firmly believe that the setback is temporary , the road is circuitous , future is bright, always have the bright spring day a sheet of to belong to us! Be considerate, I think of: We face the people who suffers reverses in course of , are still anybody disregarding the colleague who is us , our student,we do not ought to go to bite ugly duckling like the "duck" , not ought to go to peck ugly duckling like "chicken" , not ought to go and kick ugly duckling, but be to ought to believe in like the "poultry farm woman servant people ", he also will be as "so young , so good looking " as self one day!

Despite I’ve not in my childhood yet, I still prefer reading fairy-tale stories. The tales, which accompany with me in my old days, often make me think of some precious experience and sensation which only belong to children. This summer I’ve review this kind of tale, which was published in 1940. It’s the world-famous fairy-tale by the French author, Antoine de St-Exupery, The Little Prince.

As many other fairy-tales, the outline of The Little Prince is not very complex. “I”, the narrator of the story, is a pilot whose plane has something wrong and lands in the Sahara. In this occasion, the pilot makes the acquaintance of the little prince, a little boy from another planet, the Asteroid B612. The little prince has escaped from his tiny planet, because he has some quarrel with a rose, which grows on his planet. In that case he left his own planet and took an exploration at some neighbor asteroids.

On his all-alone journey, the little prince meets different kinds of people, which includes a king, a conceited man, a tippler, a businessman, a lamplighter and a geographer. From these people he gets a conclusion that the grown-ups are very odd. Following the instruction of the geographer, he descends in the Sahara, on the earth.

Traveling on the earth, the little prince, who sees a garden of five-thousand roses, is overcome with astonishment and sadness, as he considers his rose is unique in the universe before. At that time a fox appears. The fox, who tell the little prince about the meaning of the word “tame”, becomes his new friend. At the time to say farewell, the fox makes him know that his rose is unique because she is his rose and tamed by him. From that the little prince begins to treasure friendship and be responsible to his rose.

At the anniversary day of his descent of the earth, rejecting the pilot’s advice, he goes back to his own planet by bite of a snake. “It’s too far. I can not carry this body with me. It’s too heavy.” he said. He tells his friend, the pilot, he must be responsible for his rose, so he has to go back. At the end the author doesn’t tell us the ending directly. Maybe it’s more significant for us to imagine, and for more, think over.

One of the important characters is the rose. Growing on the planet, she is very beautiful, but her coquetry and vanity suffer the little prince a lot. In spite of they love each other, he soon becomes unhappy. On the time of his departure, he just knows she certainly loves him. The character of the little prince actually represents the children, and their native thoughts and deeds. On the contrary, the inhabitants on the other planets, such as the king, the businessman and the conceited man, they also reflect the defects in the grown-up’s world. The real theme of this fairy-tale with a little sadness, I guess, is the consequence of pure love and friendship in our lives, but not others “matters of consequence” of the grown-ups.

这两天我又重新读了一遍德国幽默大师埃·奥·卜劳恩的不朽杰作：连环漫画《父与子》，读了之后我感觉特别快乐。

这本书可以称得上是老少皆宜。它主要描绘了一对父子的故事，画面虽然简单，一般都只有四小幅图，却为我们展现出一段段生动有趣的故事，描绘出父与子之间的天伦之乐，让人读后感觉心里暖暖的，很温馨，很感人。书中的父亲风趣幽默，对儿子既严厉又疼爱，特别是为了纠正儿子的一些小错误，也会打他的屁股;书中的儿子聪明可爱，时常用小聪明捉弄爸爸，但遇到有人嘲笑他的爸爸时，他又总是打抱不平。通过这本书，我们看到了一对善良的父子、一对亲密的父子，既让人忍俊不禁，又给人无比的感动。

《菊与刀》的作者鲁斯·本尼迪特女士曾经分析过大和民族国民性中的矛盾特性，即“当人们提及日本人时，仍然使用一系列令人极为迷惑的，‘但是，又……’等词句……一个严肃负责的观察家在描述日本以外的民族时，是不会一方面说这个民族彬彬有礼，同时又加上一句说但是，‘他们又很蛮横、傲慢’;不会说某一个国家的民族无比顽固，又说‘但是，他们也极易适应激烈变革’，‘……从很大程度上讲，日本人既生性好斗又和平礼让，既穷兵黩武，而又崇尚美感;既顺从而又憎恨受人摆布……’。对于日本人矛盾的国民性，早已成为日本论著中的论述脉络，无数的矛盾在理性思维推理下无法成立，然而却又如此真实存在。而太宰治，以及他的代表作《人间失格》大概是能证明这个命题的最有力论据。

1948年，太宰治写下《人间失格》后便跳河_，《人间失格》无疑成为天鹅之作。作为一部典型的自传体小说，故事的主人公大庭叶藏是太宰治人生轨迹的复刻。大庭叶藏近乎固执地认为自己是一个“边缘人”，他性格敏感且脆弱，与女友相携_自己虽然幸存却因为女友遇难而获教唆_罪而锒铛入狱;他思想反动，参加非法的右翼社团;他终于静下心与一个女子相爱并结为夫妻，却因为歹人玷污了他的妻子，致使他一步一步地走向堕落。他选择吸毒，不时寻找短见。后来，大庭叶藏被送进了精神病院，抛弃了整个世界，然而却也可怜地被世界抛弃。

不同于川端康成的传统日式写作，或是村上春树式的脱亚派写作，太宰治的颓废无赖派在日本文坛上一枝独秀。

太宰治塑造的大庭叶藏，显示出的最显著特征就是骄傲和懦弱同时存在的典型日式矛盾性，即拒绝一切妥协，然而却对现实无力也无心调和，这是对大庭叶藏或者说是对太宰治的颓废最合理的描写。纵观太宰治一生的经历，对比《人间失格》中大庭叶藏，两人就像是实像和镜像一般，不谋而合。太宰治短暂的一生中，有五次携不同情人_的经历(除最后一次外，其余四次均获救，而他的情人无一逃脱厄运)，这样的特别经历，即使是在战后日本作家频繁_的怪圈下(如川断康成，三岛由纪夫等作家)，也是十分罕见的。

一个作家的写作常受到社会环境以及个人经历等多方面原因影响，参照太宰治的经历以及日本战后作家群风格纷繁复杂的现象，可见太宰治的写作与社会环境有着莫大的关系。

太宰治生于明治42年，卒于昭和23年，日本经历着对外殖民受挫、战争失败_投向美国、封建传统社会_向现代化转变、武士道忠诚遭到质疑等种.种创伤。人们开始对那个年代彷徨、迷茫，而敏感、犀利的太宰治迅速感受到这些变化，这些变化在他身上得到催化，造就了他的颓废。一方面，他骄傲地认为“即使悲哀会因此尾随而至，也无所谓，一辈子只要有过一次狂暴的欢乐就够了”，但是，在另一方面，他却又只敢向上天控诉:“不抵抗，何罪之有?”

这种矛盾，造成对太宰治，或者严格说是他笔下的大庭叶藏的评价在学术界争论颇大，痴迷者有之，围攻者更是不在少数，客观来说，即使他生前死后一直处于毁誉参半的境况，但对他的评价，还是依然需要按照某个日本作家所说的“无论是肯定他还是否定他，他的作品总拥有一种不可思议的魔力，在今后很长一段时间李，太宰笔下生动的描绘都会直逼读者灵魂，让人无法逃脱”。诚然，当读者的感情与作品产生共鸣是，才是真正意义上的阅读，包括颓废以及懦弱等等，太宰治的笔戳向了那个时期人们心中不愿意或不敢提起，却又难以回避的懦弱，这不免有些令人尴尬，日本右翼作家三岛由纪夫更是直接地道出了对太宰治的不满，但是回过头想想，苏醒懦弱难道不是一种呼唤人性的行为吗(包括三岛由纪夫本身因无法接受日本法西斯覆灭而选择的_，也可以算作是某种懦弱)?在某种程度上，这无异是上帝一般的存在的。

然而，这样一个人，某些时候如神一样启迪、解放世人的人，却以死作为谢幕，而不是苟活于世，究竟那一个更值得肯定一些，我们无从解答。如他所提的问题一样:“请问上天:不抵抗何罪之有?”大概是只有上帝能回答得了吧。

These days, I read the book "pride and prejudice", immediately mixed feelings in the heart, mind, and Im ripping mad. "Pride and prejudice" mainly about the British in the 19th century social middle class farmer Mr Daughters of romantic story. Eldest daughter JiAn gentleness docile, beautiful, with weak character of rich kids bentley love at first sight, but at a crucial moment had twists and turns. Second daughter, Elizabeth smart beautiful, have ambition, have definite view, darcy met with riches. A withdrawn, introverted darcy is proud, but love for Elizabeth stubborn personality independence, but his love for the first time but it was rejected, finally found upon Elizabeth darcy is not prosperous, the pursuit of the good qualities of love. At the same time, the bentley also get a friends support and JiAn meet again, two couple then became lovers.

By reading this book, I learned that in the early 19th century British society on the marriage between the upper and middle class society and the world human sentiment, and the author of the true love can go beyond the conflict between different classes, eliminates arrogance, eliminate prejudice, to achieve a perfect marriage of this ideal state.

这几天，我读了《傲慢与偏见》这本书，心中顿时百感交集，思绪万千，心情久久不能平静。《傲慢与偏见》主要讲的是英国19世纪处于社会中产阶层的农场主柏纳特先生几个女儿的婚恋故事。大女儿姬安温柔善良，美丽可人，与性格软弱的富家子弟宾利一见倾心，但在关键时刻却产生了波折。二女儿伊丽莎白聪慧清丽，有志气，有主见，与家产万贯的达西相识。达西性格内向，孤僻高傲，却对伊丽沙白独立倔强的个性产生了爱慕，可他的第一次求爱却遭到了拒绝，最后达西发现伊丽莎白身上具有不图富贵，追求真情的可贵品质。同时，宾利也得到朋友的支持与姬安再次相见，两对新人便结成了眷属。

通过读这本书，我了解到19世纪初期英国社会上层与中层不同阶级之间在联姻上的门第观念和世事人情，以及作者塑造的真正的爱情可以超越不同阶层的对立，消除傲慢，消除偏见，达到完美婚姻的这一理想境界。

《英语教学方法与策略》读后感

为了提高自身的英语教学质量和效率,我从学校图书馆借来《英语教学方法与策略》一书,利用业余时间认真地进行了研读,获得了不少教益。

这本书由鲁子问和康淑敏两位专家编写,由华东师范大学出版社出版,可以作为英语教学设计方向研究生教材,也可以作为中小学英语教师设计培训教材使用。我认为在英语学科骨干教师研修班接受培训期间读读这样一本书是再合适不过的。这本书介绍了教学方法与教学策略的相同与差异,提出了教学方法与策略的选择与整合的方法,介绍了英语教学方法的实践操作方法,包括情景教学法、交际教学法、任务教学法和自主学习教学,然后分析了英语教学过程的策略及实践操作方法,并从英语知识教学的策略及实践操作方法、英语技能教学的策略及时间操作方法两方面对英语教学方法与策略的行动研究提供了系统的指导。

编者用六章分别讲了教学方法与教学策略、英语教学方法的实践操作、英语教学过程的策略及实践操作、英语知识教学的策略及实践操作、英语技能教学的策略及实践操作和英语教学方法与策略的行动研究。

该书对相关理论进行了系统、简要的讲解,主要的内容是对英语教学实践的指导与分析。每一节都采用“准备-学习-实践”三部式结构,不仅讲解理论,而且注重教学实践。在每一节的理论讲解之后,都设计了“实践分析”专栏,以强化理论与实践的直接联系。在看每一节的时候,我都是跟着该书的编排形式在不断地调整自己的思维。在准备环节,编者会给出一个案例,让读者思考,遇到此类教学问题该如何解决,此时,我的大脑就会回忆我在教学中有没有遇到过,我又是如何解决的,然后思考怎样才能解决得更好;在学习环节,编者给我们提供了最系统的理论知识,此时我就很认真地研读每一条理论,认真理解每一个概念,为今后的教学活动积累必要的理论知识;在实践部分,我仔细地看了每个实践活动,对于一些比较有价值的活动自己在教学中也尝试着使用。

本书的优点是:1)语言浅显易懂。不像平常的教育着作,带着很多专业术语。2)内容很实用。书中不但简要地介绍教育理论,还举出大量的课堂活动例子,很适合各个层次的外语教师参考。3)描述很细致。书中谈到英语教学中很多细节的东西。4)编排符合读者习惯,发人深思。书中每一章节都会在适当的位置上安排一个文本框,给出一些名词解释或让读者讨论或思考一个问题。如:请讨论,您如何看待Practice makes perfect.它与数量原则有什么关系?训练中如何把握训练的量?

这本书让我羞愧于自己在教学理论和策略方面知识的匮乏,更让我明白英语教学的成功应体现在“培养学习者在真实的情景中有效使用英语的能力”我是一个率性而为的人,很多时候只是随心而教学,不会严格遵循某一教学模式。所以一直以来,教学成绩都没有取得重大突破,而我本人也一直为此烦恼,这本书教会我许多有理论支持的教学方法。如:语法翻译法、直接教学法、认知法、自然法、社团教学法、沉默教学法、全身反应法、暗示教学法。从书中我悟到了想成为一名优秀的教师必须充分认识到“教必有法”的原则性和“教务定法”的灵活性特点之间的统一关系。教师不应拘于一法一策,囿于一方一圆,而是要因地制宜,因材施教,将各类方法加以组合和调配,在吸收、借鉴已有教学方法的基础上,创造性地发挥,逐步形成富有教师个人特色的教学风格。在教学实践中,我根据教学环境、教学目标、教学内容、学生的需求和自身的教学风格适丰富了一下教学方法和策略,收到了一定的效果。

我最受启发的是书中的如下观点:呈现学习任务时,应当向学习者描述任务中的问题发生的物理背景、组织和社会文化背景。并且,问题的呈现必然是有趣的或吸引人的,目的是引导学习者的积极参与。让学习者体现到伸手可及的成功;教学活动的设置应考虑学习者的兴趣,需要和情感;老师可以和学习者商量课堂活动的内容并建议学习者把他们感兴趣的学习材料带回班上。让我陷入长久的沉思的是这个观点:“personalities and relationships are important for motivation”即:教师的性格及其与学习者之间的良好关系在调动学习者学习方面很重要。文中提到“即使我们不能完全改变自己去满足不同学习者的需要,但我们可以主动了解学习者感兴趣的话题,如:流行音乐,年轻人喜欢的电影,新车,科技的发展等。看到这里,对于学生为什么没有积极参与我自以为精心准备的课堂活动,我似乎找到了答案:设计活动时,我只是从教材内容和个人兴趣出发。当学生冷淡对待活动时,我只会埋怨大的学习环境不好,埋怨学生不配合,极少去思考是否学生对内容感兴趣,是否活动的难度适合学生,课堂指令是否清晰等因素。文中还指出:即使学生会使用老师准备好的语言结构,也明确活动的目的,但如果他们缺乏信心,也不会积极参与…所以,对学生及时得体的鼓励相当重要,借用李阳老师的话就是鼓励学生 “Enjoy losing face. Enjoy making mistakes ”总之,要踏上英语教学的成功之路,进行方方面面的准备工作是必要的,

对于以后的教学,我将努力改变陈旧的教学理念,尝试新的教学模式,自始至终把学生放在中心位置:把激发学生的学习热情放在首位,发挥交际教学的优势。是时候改变沉闷的课堂气氛,还学生一个愉快的学习环境了!是时候彻底解放学生,还学生一个可以自主学习的空间了!

其实,单纯阅读只是一个浅层理解词句的过程,我们可能在阅读中很感动,很受启发,但是,几个星期或几个月后,可能我们的思维又回复原状;若把我们的所思所想写下来,联系我们的教学或生活实际加以变通,可能会更长久地影响我们;而如果把我们学到的经验及时应用在教学中或生活中,我们的学生或我们自己则会终身受益,这才是阅读的目的。“热爱阅读、高效阅读、创新阅读”让我们互勉!

[英语教学方法与策略的读后感

《爷爷一定有办法》是书香流动活动张云鹏借到的第一本绘本。这本书张云鹏曾在4岁时通过“绘本小屋”借阅过，只是他对此已无印象了。

我们是通过如下方式进行阅读的：第一晚由给张云鹏阅读，让他对此书的内容有了初步的了解;第二晚由妈妈给张云鹏阅读，他对此书中的附属小——老鼠一家产生了深厚的兴趣，这就是孩子与众不同的欣赏角度;第三晚由张云鹏给、妈妈阅读，让他对的内容有了的理解。

《爷爷一定有办法》故事内容简洁、易懂，整个故事中浓浓的爱贯穿着始终，让人情不自禁的感叹：“啊!原来这就是!”布满星星、月亮的兰面料在爷爷手中演绎的如此神奇，爷爷为约瑟想出的一个个办法感动着我们的心，这就是爱的力量。

说实在的，《朝花夕拾》这本书，有点难读，其一，语言令人难懂。如果不静下心来看的话，是一点儿也看不懂。

朝花夕拾这名字非常美，带有诗意。但是书中文章可是非常的令人难以读懂。

书中有些文章好像是一个人蒙了纱一样，看不清面目。

书中最令我难忘的是“藤野先生”这一篇。鲁迅以前在日本学医，藤野先生是鲁迅先生的老师。藤野先生全名藤野严九郎。文中写道，中国人要被日军枪毙的情景。围观的中国人都喊起来：“万岁!”这声万岁不知道他们是怎么喊出来的。他们竟然不知道耻辱!鲁迅写道，这声欢呼是每一次枪毙都有的，但是在他听来，却特别刺耳。

文中还写道，“中国是弱国，所以中国人当然是低能儿，分数在六十分以上的便不是自己的能力了……”此话让人非常愤怒。想到以前的中国是出于底层，我就感到即悲伤，又气愤!

这本书写了鲁迅那个年代所发生的一些有趣、悲伤、气愤的一些事。非常的真实。

文中有些外国语言，我想，因该是一些专业术语喝一些人的名字。

在书的导读部分最后一句写道：作品的语言清新、朴实，亲切感人，是现代回忆散文的典范之作!

没错，这本作品的确是现代回忆散文的典范之作!

《伊索寓言》是我最喜欢看的一本书。相传这本书是古希腊奴隶伊索所著，里面讲述了一个个简明生动、寓意深刻的故事，让人深受启发，所以我特别喜欢看这本书。

其中，我最喜欢《树和斧子》这个故事。它讲述了一个樵夫砍材的艰辛和快乐生活。有一次他砍材的时侯把斧子柄弄断了，就求助大树的帮助。大树帮助了樵夫，给了他一截树枝做斧子柄。樵夫把大树砍倒了。一棵老橡树看到同伴们被砍倒时，气愤地感慨：都是大树葬送了他们的生命。如果它不给樵夫帮助，樵夫就无法砍伐树木。现在大树被砍倒了，大家都要跟着遭殃，所以大树不应该盲目帮助对自己有危害的人。这个故事警示示人们要分清是非，谨言慎行。

读着读着，我不禁想起了《农夫和蛇》《东郭先生和狼》这两个故事，是啊，帮助对自已有潜在威胁的对象时，一定要小心。否则，哪怕一点小小的帮助，也能带来灭顶之灾。

《伊索寓言》就像是一个魔术袋，它让我明白了什么是真什么是假，什么是善什么是恶，什么该做什么不该做，所以我深深地喜欢上了这本书。

今天我读了一个故事，故事中说到一个大财主大摆酒宴。席间划拳行令喧闹如潮，一个老头因牛肉没嚼烂而卡住喉咙，顿时大汗淋漓，翻白眼，众人纷纷为他想办法处理，把老汉左右折腾，老头儿气得大喊而吐出牛肉，财主见状要各位回家说：“有了前车之鉴，要想不再发生这样的灾祸，酒肉不可吃，三餐不可有”。

读了这个故事之后，我想起了爷爷跟我讲小时候学走路的事。当时我刚学会了走路，没走几步就会摔倒，但是当时自己都站不起来，然后爷爷把我抱起来放在地上让我接着走，现在想想自己不想站起来，可能是再也不想学走路了，但是我并没有因为摔倒而放弃了学走路。

因噎废食，故事中的财主，因为老头儿被噎着，而放弃了三餐时，我意识到不能因为受到挫折而放弃做这件事情，虽然老头儿因为吃牛肉噎着了。但是是老头儿急于说话所造成的，所以财主因此放弃三餐是不对的，而是要找到事情的原因。

读了这个故事使我知道两个道理，酒肉不可吃，三餐不可有是不对的可以在请别人吃饭的时候尽量不要说话，还有要是想说话就等到嘴里没有东西在说话才对。