傲慢与偏见读后感英文（优秀20篇）

《傲慢与偏见》是简·奥斯汀的代表作。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的资料和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。

《傲慢与偏见》在书中是男女主角感情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。人的缺陷太多，首先是心灵上的陷阱。要想在一生中成就一番事业，无论是知识、教养、还是感情、事业，都需要同自己心灵的种种浅浮的陷阱或阴影做斗争，经过各种误解和长时刻的反复的认识过程，慢慢由心灵克服各自弱点和毛病，而走向开放、洒脱、自由的必然结果。扰扰尘世，做人不易;茫茫人海，佳偶难见。然而没有感情不好勉强别人结婚，只要人品正直，追求美德，不放松向喜之心，不苟且、贪图一时之利欲，追求两心之和谐、相应，运用彼此的智慧，克服心灵上的缺点，终得如愿以偿。

人和人之间的相处总会有一些小小的摩擦，而这些摩擦，往往就是自己内心中所潜藏的弱点或毛病，要和别人能够更愉快的生活，就务必先了解到自己的缺点，并磨去他，其次是了解别人的内心，最后再互相深入彼此，如此一来，你会发现到社会上每一件人、事、物都是如此完美、光明，更进一步激发出你内心深处的感动，发挥出自己的专长去替这个社会、这个国家、这个世界服务，毕竟我门是万物之长，如果人们不再用心去关怀身边的人，不再去付出自己的一臂之力，那么还有谁要去完成这个任务呢?因此从此刻开始，我们就就应将自己原先所存有的毛病给除去，换上一个全新的自我，为崭新的未来打拼吧!

one of the most interesting questions about gullivers travels is whether the houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of swifts satire. in other words, in book iv, is swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? if we look closely at the way that the houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

first we have to see that swift does not even take gullver seriously. for instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. also, when he first sees the yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. he says, "i must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. this is why swift refers to erasmus darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the beagle-to show how gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. but if lemule gulliver is satirized, so are the houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. they walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. as gulliver says, "it was with the utmost astonishment that i witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a vienese waltz. to my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the lord edmund burke" . as this quote demonstrates, gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. for instance, the leader of the houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of charles dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the kings and queens of england up to george ii. swift subtly shows that this houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of queen elizabeths husband.

swifts satire of the houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. one of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that guenivre has brought with him to the island. first she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. but when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "as i watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than mr. pope being fitted by a clothier. she dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. my horse sniffed the creature and turned away." it might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. but it makes more sense if we see that swift is being satiric here: it is the female houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century england. the houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress gullivers horse. gulliver imagines the horse saying, sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held mr. pope on her back makes me queezy .

a final indication that the houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the houynhms visits lilliput, where he visits the french royal society. he goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at gallilee). the scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "the creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

he has accomplished the scientists goal, but the scientist is not happy, for his livelihood has now been destroyed. swifts clear implication is that even though the houyhnhmns are smart, they do not know how to use that knowledge for the benefit of society, only for their own prideful agrandizement.

throughout gullivers travels, the houyhnhms are shown to be an ideal gone wrong. though their intent might have been good, they dont know how to do what they want to do because they are filled with pride. they mislead gulliver and they even mislead themselves. the satire on them is particularly well explained by the new born houyhnhm who, having just been born, exclaims, "with this sort of entrance, what must i expect from the rest of my life!" .

《简·爱》之后，今天又看完了《傲慢与偏见》，感觉蛮有味道的。与朋友聊天说看完这两本书，不知道为啥，却着实被鄙视了一般，也许吧，正经的公务员书籍会计书籍不去看，去看这么些杂书，着实太不正经。只是现在的记忆力越来越不行了，又让我想到了“快餐”这个词，既然如此，趁还记得，就记录下点点思绪吧。

女儿买回一本英文版的《傲慢与偏见》，沟起我对少年中学时代的回忆。

那年，正是我初二放假的时期，那天，我正聚精会神的“偷看”“第二次握手”。当我正如痴如醉的感动在握手的精彩故事情节时，大哥走过来，手里拿着一本书丢在桌面上，在丢下书的同时也丢下一句话：“好好看看，别成天自以为是，看完给我写读后感，我要检查的”，说完就走了。我愣了半响，半天没反映。拿起那本书一看，就是中文版的《傲慢与偏见》。

这是我看的第一本外国小说，看书之前，我并不明白大哥的用意，看完之后，才知道大哥的用心良苦。

因为出身在军人家庭，再因为优越的家庭环境，更因为是家中之掌上明珠，我总是昂首挺胸、目不斜视、目中无人一般，从来不知道天有多高地有多厚。除了长辈，除了大院里的孩子，除了需要关照的贫民百姓，对那些地方干部或一般阶层出身的孩子，我从不屑一顾，待人接物上从没给过好脸色、好语调。尤其是二个哥哥的同学到访，更是雪上加霜冷言冷语，这让二个哥哥很是头痛，虽不止一次的对我加以指责，只因我的反唇相击，令他们无奈则罢。

奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》，以日常生活为素材，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。它是一本既浪漫又现实的爱情故事，更是对人的个性和处世待人的一种行为和态度的认知。这本书，是我人生成长中第一个最为重要的认知转折点。

还是说说这本书吧，主人公是小贵族班纳特家的二女儿伊丽莎白和一个富家子弟达西，两个人的性格特色鲜明，一个直率坦诚但又略显固执，一个举止优雅事业有成而又有些目中无人的傲慢，这是刚开始阅读时的印象。

达西先生生于贵族家庭，年收入不下一万英镑，父母亲从小开始便教他保持高格调，并常常出入上流贵族社会中，慢慢养成了傲慢而目中无人的性格特点。处于贵族身份并且有着高收入的他，有着那份傲慢是应该的，只是，可贵之处在于达西的性格在于与伊丽莎白之间产生的爱情而彻底变化，由一个举止优雅但无比傲慢的贵族子弟变成乐善好施而又体恤他人、风度翩翩而举止依然不失风雅的上流人士。

伊丽莎白性格直爽坦诚，初入世事的她跟有着少女共同的特征，天真烂漫而对事物充满着好奇心，对爱情充满渴望而又谨小慎微。除姐姐吉英和父亲外，伊丽莎白与妹妹们的交流较少，我认为这也是作者在突出伊丽莎白成熟的特征。伊丽莎白的偏见是显而易见的，只是与其说是偏见，不如说是一种不服输的心理，而我觉得这倒是极为可爱的性格。

美好的事物总需要一波三折的过程来铺垫和润色。从开始第一次见面跳舞后伊丽莎白的偏见开始，伊丽莎白的眼中就只剩缺陷了，着实是一个傲慢的纨绔子弟，而他人对达西的所有负面评价都是对的，并且升值超过与他人的描述。直等到达西求婚不成，傲慢而客观的一封信，才导致伊丽莎白感情的转折，当然这次的打击也是达西性格的转变点。从此以后，伊丽莎白对事实的求证使得对达西的感情愈加升温，达西则变得越来越体恤他人。最后，达西准备再次向伊丽莎白求婚，伊丽莎白也在与内心斗争，达西的舅母对伊丽莎白的恐吓和威胁反而成为了这桩婚姻的催化剂，坚定了达西和伊丽莎白的心理。

我感觉这本书除了传达傲慢与偏见对人之间交流的阻碍外，同样在说明，如果爱一个人，另外一个人和自己是相似的，而且幕后做的事情总比眼前多的多。达西为了伊丽莎白，默默的帮韦翰还清了债务，并给了一定的财务支持，并最终促进了丽迪亚的婚姻而不致闹成笑话。而这一切，若非舅母柯林斯的回信，也许伊丽莎白永远也不知道达西所做的所有。而伊丽莎白，作为女性的内敛美也是表现的惟妙惟肖。母亲对达西的冷落和嘲讽，伊丽莎白的内心是如此忐忑不安与痛苦，默默承受心中的愧疚。眼神表达的情感是无法掩饰的，伊丽莎白直率而不愿高攀他人，但在几次与达西见面而不敢直视，脸胀通红，伊丽莎白所拥有的女性美展现的如此可爱……

说实话，对书中的爱情故事，因年少，我看的似懂非懂，也并不再意。而对书中女主人公伊丽沙白那补实真诚，以及在跟傲慢无礼的男主人公达西对话时表现出来的聪明才智，特别的欣赏和敬佩。

书中的对话机智幽默，妙趣横生。记得其中一句“如果你果真聪明的过人，那么你傲慢的就会有分寸”，也就是说，没有分寸的傲慢，是一种无知和无礼的表现，更是幼稚和自负的可怜。当一个人把自己看的比其他人都略高一等的时候，总会摆出一幅高高在上的姿态。在日常生活中，不经意间，我们不知不觉的也会成为傲慢与偏见的主角，而我就是无法认知自己的毛病成为了书中的主角，这是很可悲的。在读完这部著作后，我才体味到了它的价值所在。

很感激我的大哥，这本书对我日后的成长，起到了翻天覆地的变化。最起码，我的行为和态度有所改善，待人接物不在那么傲慢无礼，最重要的是，我懂得了什么叫尊重，在我成长的日子里，常常告诫自己：“尊严不是与生俱来的，而是要有内涵，用智慧和能力获得成就，那才是真正的有尊严；高傲也不是天生的，无知的高傲自己而贬低他人，这只会令他人看不起自己。真正有尊严、有才学的人绝不会如此妄自菲薄”。

《傲慢与偏见》中的人物刻画细腻，令人赏心悦目。这是一部优美而平和的作品，有很多值得我们深思的道理，值得一读。子曰：“朝闻道，夕死可矣。”吾曰：“阅毕一书，得一道足矣。”

同夏洛蒂·勃朗特一样，奥斯丁也是牧师的女儿，奥斯丁从小和家人住在父亲任职教区的牧师住宅里，度过的安定、祥和的童年。由于早年受教于父亲，奥斯丁从中获得了广博的知识和良好的修养。虽然她的一生如此短暂，但，就生命的高度而言，奥斯丁的确创造了自己的奇迹。她的小说，都是经过反复的修改后才正式成文的。而《傲慢与偏见》的成就也正是对她的肯定。

虽然这篇小说的主要篇幅都是谈婚论嫁，却并不同于一般的爱情小说。就我个人而言，更倾向于把它定位为世态小说。正如众多的世态小说一样，奥斯丁的《傲慢与偏见》也带有通俗浅显的特点，但其最终能够脱颖而出，却不是偶然的。“精心选择的语言”和“机智幽默”代表了《傲慢与偏见》艺术形式方面的本质。奥斯丁曾说，她创造小说，像是用一支又尖又细的画笔，在小小的一块象牙上轻描慢绘。而我，对于这点，在看完这部小说后，有着深刻的体会。奥斯丁善于通过幽默讽刺的对话表现人物的性格特点。因而，在我看完小说后，感觉书中的每一个人物都给我留下了很深刻的印象。

在众多人物当中，首先吸引我注意的是美丽温柔的简。当然，不得不说，她让我想到了和她性格很像的一个人，我的姐姐。总是那么温柔，善良。从一开始，我便对她有了一定的好感。当宾利先生出现的时候，我真心为他们祝福，希望他们可以幸福。只是，他们为何那样缺乏自信。明明相爱的两个人，却因为羞涩、缺乏自信而不能正视自己内心的渴望，勇敢得追求属于自己的幸福。明明相爱的两个人，却险些因为误解而错过。他们太善良了，而善良的附属品往往是软弱。好在，最后的结局是令人欣慰的。

主人公伊丽莎白和达西先生之间的爱情，可谓是经历了重重困难。我对达西的认识，也紧随着伊丽莎白的感情而逐渐变化。诚然，从一开始，傲慢的达西先生并不十分令人欢迎，甚至，的确是让人讨厌。伊丽莎白对他的偏见也由此而展开。并随着小说情节的发展，更加深了彼此之间的误会。男主人公达西的傲慢和女主人公伊丽莎白的偏见，都带有明显的阶级性。因而，误会并非出于一系列的偶然，而是由于他们不同的阶级地位所造成的。生活在上流社会的达西，有着显赫的地位。他的这一份傲气是可以被理解的。但最终他们克服了障碍，幸福的在一起。暂且抛开当时特定的社会背景，就小说本身而言，我很欣赏小说中的男女主人公。

伊丽莎白有着自己独特的见解和胆识，敢于追求自己的幸福，这就使她避免因屈服于现实和虚荣心，而成为婚姻的奴隶，正如她的好朋友夏洛特那样。达西更固然有着傲慢的本性，但并不足以阻止他成为一个受欢迎的人。更何况，他又有着那么多可贵的品质。当他意识到自己与伊丽莎白之间的误会时，选择了把问题解释清楚，还原真相的同时，也证明了自己的清白。达西欣赏伊丽莎白的率真，也原谅了她。他用理性的眼光看待周围的人和事，并不因为本内特太太的无理、莉迪亚的轻狂而影响到他对伊丽莎白的感情。

与此同时，他更是默默地帮助了本内特一家人。正如达西自己所说，他做的这些都是为了她。因为爱她，达西先生不顾祖母凯瑟琳的阻止，选择了和自己社会地位并不相当的伊丽莎白。

我欣赏伊丽莎白和达西的那一份真诚，他们并没有因为讨好彼此而改变自己最纯真的本性，也不刻意去营造或者伪装自己给别人的印象，而总是展示自己最真实的一面。伊丽莎白和达西，简和宾利先生之间的爱情，都与夏洛特和柯林斯不同，不是因结婚而结婚，更不是建立在纯粹以金钱和物质享受的基础上。他们是彼此相爱的，他们相信，依靠品德而结合的爱情，才能永久、幸福。而作为柯林斯夫人的夏洛特，不得不忍受丈夫种种不好的行为，凭借物质力量获得的尊重和羡慕，并不能让她真正的幸福。这两种截然不同的爱情观，渗透了人类历史发展的过程。

人生如此短暂，如果仅仅是一味的追求物质欲望的满足，纵有家财万贯，精神世界却空虚贫乏，最终不能感悟到生命的真谛。其实，傲慢与偏见，都是我们人性中很常见的弱点。在现实的人际交往中，我们往往会因为第一印象，而主观地给别人下定义，造成彼此之间的误解。只有在长久的观察和接触之后，才能对人有较为深入客观的了解和认识。正如小说中的男女主人公一样，正是因为了解而改变。小说中本内特太太可是贯穿全文的一个重要角色。我承认，她并不是一个贤惠的妻子，也不是一个体贴的母亲。她的一举一动总会引起别人的反感。可以说，她主要以负面形象存在。但有一点却是不容置疑的，她是爱她的孩子们的。

虽然她的做法总是不被人理解，甚至过于神经，但他所做的这些都是为自己的女儿们着想，希望她们都能有个好的归宿。其实，在当时特殊的社会背景下，她的行为又似乎是可以被理解的。我想，不仅是在爱情和婚姻方面，做人理应如此，不管对谁，不卑不亢，凭自己的人格魅力和优秀品质，去赢得他人的尊敬。或许，这才是“对人性最透彻的了解”的意义所在。

“凡是有钱的单身汉，总想娶位太太，这已经成了一条举世公认的真理。这样的单身汉，……人们总是把他看作自己某一个女儿理所应得的一笔财产。”简·奥斯汀在《傲慢与偏见》中描写了几对年轻人的爱情故事，小说没有重大的历史事件为背景，而是以幽默细腻的笔触展现了18世纪末19世纪初英国乡村中产阶级生活的画面，表明了作者对于爱情的态度。像夏洛蒂和柯林斯那样互不了解、没有爱情的婚姻是不会幸福的，而聪明、美丽、自尊的伊丽莎白与达西的感情则是建立在相互了解与尊重的基础上，他们才是幸福的。

初读小说中译本是大约十多年前的事了，那时只是醉心于伊丽莎白与达西这对淑女绅士之间曲折但终成正果的爱情，加之喜欢小说流畅俏皮的文笔，所以一连读了好几遍。

与小说同名的电影同样令我着迷，它在对小说的整体把握与剪裁、演员的表演、配乐等方面均可圈可点。电影限于篇幅删去了一些次要人物和情节，但伊丽莎白与达西、简与彬格莱、夏洛蒂与柯林斯以及莉迪雅与韦翰这四对年轻人的恋爱婚姻仍然脉络清楚、不枝不蔓。演员的表演可称上佳，达西由最初的傲慢到情不自禁到放下架子倾心相爱，伊丽莎白优雅聪明、自信自尊，班纳特太太缺乏修养、忽喜忽嗔，柯林斯谄上倨下、滑稽可笑，还有凯瑟琳夫人傲慢无礼、出言荒唐，无不纤毫毕现，特别是后三位配角略带夸张的表演，实在令人忍俊不禁。电影的配乐也非常符合影片诙谐幽默的气氛，凡柯林斯出场必配以轻快富于跳跃感的音乐，凡凯瑟琳夫人出场则配以沉重庄严的背景音，给影片增色不少。

但若吹毛求疵的话，影片还是有几处不足。其一是莉迪雅与韦翰私奔后达西才特地前往伊丽莎白家，向她说出韦翰过去的卑劣行径，而小说则安排达西求婚遭拒之后即给伊丽莎白写信，解释韦翰之事。达西之所以要解释，是因为伊丽莎白误会了他，令他自尊心受挫，而待到私奔之事发生后，韦翰的品格已经暴露，解释已无太大必要。因此立即解释似乎比等到人家家中大乱再去解释更为合理。

十八世纪的英国，社会上社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，而有一本书，它的作者用着最真实的语言，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情——《傲慢与偏见》。

故事主要以发生在那个时代的四门婚姻为主题，其中最主要的，自然是发生在女主角伊丽莎白·班纳特与男主角费茨威廉·达西之间的爱恨情仇。伊丽莎白是个勇于追求爱情、漂亮聪明、坚强可爱的中产阶级女子。故事主要以她对达西先生从一开始的厌恶到尊敬，再到爱慕为线索，也穿插了在几个发生在她身边的幸福或不幸的婚姻。

十八世纪，大英帝国正处于国家发展的巅峰时期，而奥斯丁却把视线关注在英国乡间，她以朴实的文笔描写出乡村里的各种爱恨情仇以及人们的心理变化和情感。当时英国乡间的生活在作者看来是惬意悠闲的，纯朴中包含平凡自然，但是整个英国社会的影响力始终波及着乡村，如势利、炫耀、虚荣和对婚姻的看法。

看了这本书后我想了很多，不仅是当时人们对婚姻的评判标准，还有他们对爱情的理解。在当时的社会，婚姻结缔的幸福条件就是男方有丰厚的家产，女方有不错的嫁妆，这样的婚姻就会被众人羡慕。可是这样的结合真的会给人们带来精神上的满足吗?诚然，这样的婚姻类似于一种资产合并，以钱作为婚姻的基础，在我看来是不明智而且可笑的。“什么是爱情”，这个问题似乎当时的大部分人都不能真正理解其实对于这样的社会状况，或许会有那么一些人在心里默默地反抗。所以我佩服伊丽莎白敢恨敢爱的性格，她能正视自己内心的想法而不被物质生活冲昏头脑，我想这样的人真的很可贵，在我看来，她便是那个时代的勇士。

最令我感动的情节是书中伊丽莎白在搞清楚之前对达西的误会后她所表现出来的坚持。看过这本书的人都了解，伊丽莎白消除对达西的偏见后，他们对彼此产生了日益增长的感情，而伊丽莎白对这份感情的坚持和风雨无阻的与之同行，是令人感动的。

很多时候，我们都会忽略事实的真相，因而对一个人一件事产生错误的注解。所以我们应该学会正确的判断和耐心的摸索，这样，或许我们能看到一些很美好的人。

只有了解才会有改变，当偏见化成真诚，那便是最幸福的时刻。

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.

People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.

In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

I read a very interesting book, the name of the book is called "Tom Sawyer, I like the book in the little hero and some story happened on him.

Tom is a naughty, naive and lively children, but in the eyes of an adult who is also a real bad boy, he naughty, like mischief, play truant, the nature is the norm, not only in this way, he make trouble method also each time, let a person elusive, small-scale operations. Although he is a very bad very bad child, but also to make people laugh: penalty was painting the walls, and could come up with a good way to make a friend for him to complete, and make friends with him to take a variety of foods and toys for a chance to paint the walls. In this way, Tom not only comfortable, leisure and suddenly gained a lot of gifts.

Let me more impressive is the story of Tom and huck and Joe three people formed a team when the pirates fled to a desert island. In this adventure, he met with difficulties, but he didnt lose heart, dont give up, again and again to challenge difficulties bravely, until down with difficulty.

After reading this book, I feel that we meet with difficulties dont get discouraged, and strive to insist on. Tom lives full of sunshine also tells us: as long as there is joy, have a dream, a dream can come true!

我读了一本非常有趣的书，书的名字叫《汤姆索亚历险记》，我很喜欢这本书中的小主人公以及在他身上发生的一些故事。

汤姆是一个顽皮、天真并且十分活泼的孩子，但在大人的眼里他同时也是一个不折不扣的坏孩子，他调皮、喜欢恶作剧、逃学这些自然是家常便饭，不仅这样，他捣蛋的方法还一次比一次厉害，让人琢磨不透，防不胜防。他虽然是一个很坏很坏的孩子，但也会做出让人捧腹大笑的事情：被罚粉刷墙壁，竟能想出好办法让小伙伴替他完成，并让小伙伴们拿各种各样的食物和玩具来跟他换一次刷墙的机会。这样一来，汤姆不光悠闲自在，而且一下子就收获了很多礼物。

让我印象比较深刻的是故事中汤姆与哈克再加上乔三人组成了一个团队逃到了荒岛上当海盗。在这次冒险中，他遇到了种种困难，但他并不灰心，也不放弃，一次又一次勇敢地向困难挑战，直到打倒困难为止。

读了这本书以后，我觉得遇到困难我们不要轻易气馁，而要努力奋斗，坚持下去。汤姆充满阳光的生活里也告诉我们：只要有欢乐，有梦想，美梦便可以成真!

Based on Mark Twains novel, The Millionaire Pound Note takes an interesting satirical look at the hypocrisy stemming from class distinction in the 50s England. England is a country where class and wealth are given extreme significance, especially among the rich. The film shows the hypocrisy that existed among these people, how the rich are quick to change face when in an instant they find out that youre a man of wealth and how within the next moment they revert back to their condescending selves when all wealth is lost.

Interestingly, The Millionaire also briefly looks at how the English perceived Americans in that era. Rich Americans were welcomed as outsiders and the poor were quickly shunned away. The fact that hes an outsider either makes him more appealing or the complete opposite. The story sticks to the main theme by emphasizing on the hypocrisy of the upper class society but at the same time it also creates a balance that prevents the movie from being a mockery of the British society. The movie drags at some point but the love story appears at the right time and there is plenty of comedy to keep one entertained. A charming Gregory Peck totally nails the part and the luminous Jane Griffiths is a treat. Reginald Beckwith, as Pecks sidekick Rock is amusing. The ending is a little predictable but the director does an overall good job by rounding it up and presenting his points.

百万英镑读后感英文【3】

Mark Twains short story of "one million pounds" is a very good work. The article on the "money is everything," "money is omnipotent," the idea of a satire, to expose the ugly face of capitalist society.

"One million pounds" is about a poor, honest man, that is, the heroine of this story has received a pair of brothers, the letter sent to him inside one million pounds. The brothers had made a bet, gambling, if a poor, honest people who come knocking on the door received the one million pounds, he will be what kind of results? Brother that he would starve to death because he could not prove that the money was his own, will be subject to other peoples doubts, and even the banks do not let him save money. His younger brother that he would lead a very good, and therefore they have the brothers of one million pounds will be loaned to check the poorest people, and spent 30 days abroad. Did not expect that during this period of time, people have the rare fortune suddenly rich, has tried to cozy up to him, from the free food, buy clothes, free accommodation, like a beggar, like to please him, and continue to improve his social status until the exception of the highest outdoor Wang Duke on! Not only that, he also has been a good wife and 30,000 pounds of bank interest, and finally from two brothers got a very good job. Lived a very, very happy life.

See here, I am so envious of the "lucky" the heroine, but at the same time I would like to: people reason to curry favor with him, not just because when people value money too it? Worship of money is shameful and should not be reaping more! Money is not omnipotent, the world than money, there are many more important things … …

I just finished reading the English "Annie diary. This is my first time to see the book. The first time I see in elementary school, English. At that time, still cant read, feel nothing. And now, it seems, has deep deep feeling.

Anne frank a jewish girl. She could and ordinary girl live a happy life, but her parents to be hiding in the attic. (www.lz13.cn)Little Annie all hide in the attic of dark, avoiding the Nazis killing. She couldnt close to nature, and friends to play like before. In the shadow of death, Annie only a diary to a torrid every day. For her diary as her friends, she can only rely on and talk to a friend. She is in her diary written a lot of racial discrimination, silent, more is to the outside world, to nature yearning, for life.

From her diary, I could imagine that she was helpless, fear, but more calm and calm. This is a great girl.

After reading the "Annie diary, my heart is very heavy. The Nazi racism, destroying much like Anne as innocent lovely child. War is abhorrent, it lets the human experience is destined unscathed.

Thanks to "Annie diary, let people see war, let people to think ugly, go for unfortunate people mourn.

Let history repeat, dont ever ask world peace.

The author pays homage to Hans Christian Andersen‘s compassionate tale with this faithful adaptation. Kids can relate to the duckling‘s dilemma; part of the growing-up proceis pulling away from those around you and developing a strong sense of self. Children have also witnessed or experienced the teasing that is part and parcel of childhood.

This agelestory speaks acrogenerations with its reaffirming message. In this age of instant gratification, Andersen‘s tale reminds readers that some things are worth waiting for and that a pleasure deferred (whether by choice or necessity) is often the sweetest one of all.

Pinkney‘s descriptive passages resonate with the splendor of nature‘s beauty. The glowing watercolors, filled with intricate details, make each blade of gravisible, and the delicately drawn, nearly transparent mosquitoes are as ethereal as they are in life. The subtle details incorporated into the scenes--a frog catching a passing fly at the pond and a tiny mouse perched by a crate in the old woman‘s cottage--make children take another look.

One day he heard a sound of whirring wings, and up in the air he saw a flock of birds flying high. They were as bright as the snow that had fallen during the night, and their long necks were stretched southward. Oh, if only he could go with them! But what sort of companion could he be to those beautiful beings?

‘I am too ugly even for a dog to eat,‘ the duckling thought. Jerry Pinkney‘s poignant text and rich artwork convey the timeleappeal of this tale of hardship and redemption. Anyone who has suffered the sting of ostracism can sympathize with the ugly duckling‘s plight and will relish the uplifting conclusion.

One of the most interesting questions about Gullivers Travels is whether the Houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of Swifts satire. In other words, in Book IV, is Swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? If we look closely at the way that the Houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact Swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

First we have to see that Swift does not even take Gullver seriously. For instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. Also, when he first sees the Yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. He says, "I must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. This is why Swift refers to Erasmus Darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the Beagle-to show how Gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. But if Lemule Gulliver is satirized, so are the Houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. They walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. As Gulliver says, "It was with the utmost astonishment that I witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a Vienese waltz. To my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the Lord Edmund Burke" . As this quote demonstrates, Gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the Houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. For instance, the leader of the Houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of Charles Dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the Kings and Queens of England up to George II. Swift subtly shows that this Houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of Queen Elizabeths husband.

Swifts satire of the Houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. One of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that Guenivre has brought with him to the island. First she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. But when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "As I watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than Mr. Pope being fitted by a clothier. She dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. My horse sniffed the creature and turned away." It might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. But it makes more sense if we see that Swift is being satiric here: it is the female Houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century England. The Houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress Gullivers horse. Gulliver imagines the horse saying, Sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held Mr. Pope on her back makes me queezy .

A final indication that the Houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the Houynhms visits Lilliput, where he visits the French Royal Society. He goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at Gallilee). The scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the Houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "The creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. Slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

本篇小说是简·奥斯汀在英国的巅峰时期写的，她写的这篇小说，趣味不失，却又讽刺了乡村人的势力、炫耀、虚荣，和对婚姻的扭曲看法。她用自己与众不同的文笔，表述了两种不幸与幸运的婚姻。

小说围绕着柏纳特太太如何让把女儿嫁出去的主题展开故事。其中以二女儿的婚事为主线。男主人公达西富有、高贵、但却十分高傲;二女儿伊丽莎白年轻、任性且聪明活泼，对达西心存偏见。爱情在两人之间忽隐忽现，步履维艰，但最终还是打破了这种傲慢与偏见。小说在两人幸福美满的婚姻中落下帷幕。柏纳特先生的五个女儿很好的表现了当时乡村社会的女性：大女儿简温文尔雅，心地善良;二女儿伊丽莎白聪明有主见，对事物有着自己独特的看法;三女儿玛丽相貌不突出，但知识渊博，品行端正;排行第四的凯蒂和小女儿莉迪亚，个性浮夸，整天不务正业，只顾贪享玩乐，不知天高地厚，莉迪亚因为单纯愚蠢，被一点利诱就骗上钩。

奥斯丁认为不幸的婚姻大致有两种情况，一种是伊丽莎白的闺蜜夏绿蒂的婚姻，她因为总是担心自己的空世不好，怕自己老了都嫁不掉，所以嫁给了一个没有教养、行为粗鲁，但比较在钱的男人，夏绿蒂为了过上较好的生活，不惜每天夜晚无耐地忍受这个满身恶习的人。还有一种是莉迪亚的婚姻，她因为年纪轻轻而愚昧无知，只因为一个男人外表俊美而内心虚伪，深深地迷恋上了他，最后酿成无法收拾的后果，结婚后，当知道丈夫整天沉迷于赌博，充当无业游民，心里一定满是后悔与无耐。

这篇文章用两个主角的爱情故事告诉我们一个道理，不要被第一印象所迷惑了。伊丽莎白一开始对达西的也有偏见，达西一开始也瞧不起伊丽莎白，有一段时时间伊丽莎白也被一虚假的人和事物蒙蔽了双眼。后来，伊丽莎白才发现达西是个善良、正直的人，达西也发现伊丽莎白是个端庄、美丽的女孩。看一个人不能只看他的表面，要看他做的事、他说的话，他的一举一动，才会发现一个人的真实面目。

这篇关于婚姻的著名小说是一本百读不厌的书。简·奥斯汀用有详有略的写法叙述了四组奇异的婚姻。道理与生活的奥秘深藏其中，等待你去挖掘，思考，品味，你就可以体会。

I have the good story is called "the wizard of oz".

Cute girl much rosie aunt and uncle Henry, amber live in Kansas prairie, lived a simple life.

Tornado came, dorothy and the dog toto volume to a strange place. Suddenly, a fairy appeared and said, "want to go home, just look for the oates king." So we started dorothy with toto, the way, they met a scarecrow, he is a thinking mind; Tin man alive heart; The cowardly lion to courage. Together they find otzi king, climbing wading, find ways to solve the problems one by one and defeated the fierce tiger and bear. Finally met oates king, but oates king, the king asked them to beat west evil spirit, they have killed the west evil spirit with buckets of water. Because western bride what all not afraid, only afraid of water. But Mr King, is an old man, and dorothy depends on own strength to go home, the desire of the partners are achieved.

This is my favorite story books because dorothy and partners with wisdom and strength, to overcome all difficulties.

我有本好故事名叫《绿野仙踪》。

可爱的小女孩多萝茜和亨利叔叔、艾姆婶婶住在堪萨斯州大草原上，过着简单的生活。

龙卷风来了，把多萝西和小狗托托卷到一个陌生的地方。突然，一个仙女出现了，说：“想回家，就先找奥茨大王。”于是多萝西带托托出发了，路上，他们遇稻草人，他要一个会思考的脑子;铁皮人要颗鲜活的心脏;胆小狮要胆量。他们一起去找奥茨大王，爬山涉水，想方设法解决了一个一个的难题，打败了凶猛的虎头熊。最后终于见到了奥茨大王，可是奥茨大王要他们打败西方魔女，他们用桶水打死了西方魔女。因为西方魔女什么都不怕，唯一害怕水。但是奥茨大王是个老头，于是多萝西就靠自己的力量回家了，伙伴们的愿望也都实现了。

这是我最喜欢的故事书，因为多萝西和伙伴们拥有智慧和力量，战胜一切困难。

If a woman has even a tiny sense of dignity, she must shoulder any number of sacrifices rather than have her love varnished with venal character by asking for money from her lover. Extravagances, luxury as well as all other empery pleasures are valuelein front of love. As long as you love me, I ask for nothing else.

-------Marguerite(La Dame Aux Camellias)

Whenever I lingered over the magnificant story, I cannot help deeply touched by the bitterly sweet love, which struck the world as gentle as an April shower, as pure as a blowing snow, as heady as an old wine. It condensed a paradise into a kept woman’s heart, which caught and held us transfixed against prejudice in mind and greed in nature, , and provided a journey that brought home to us a comprehensive understanding of love.

Marguerite, as a kept woman,did not undergo the usual penalty of confronting wrinkles appeared under her eyes, the first death of a courtesans, but was endowed enough fortune to enjoy an unselfish and gorgeous love during her ephemeral life, witch came as a wonderful oasis to lead supply a new prospect in a disparate desert, appeared as a miracle medication to heal her wound in the sinful life, figured as a brisk spring to refresh and revitalize her lonely heart, and emerged as a great beacon of courage to kill all her bad habits in the past and make a firm determination to seek for a peaceful but fantastic life with her loved one.

Lingering between the words, we could completely feel how kind and dignified she was. She refused Armond although she knew he was really loved her with his soul. because of her gloomy despair of life, she did not turn up in his life as a figure who was sad, ill, gay with a giant sadder than grief, besides witch, who spit blood and spent a hundred thousand francs in a year. Touching this words, how can we avoid our zealous sympathy for her? She bickered with the marquis and drove him away from her family, because she hated and refused to be treated as merchandise. Touching her deeds, how could we deny our high respect for her? At last, she renounced all her hope and life just because another woman’s name. What she e although you may get hurt, but it is the only way you can live absolutely. But what she experienced, what she faced and what she did made her a real sublime angle and an eternal ideal woman in people’ heart.

However, no matter what devout wish, no matter what gorgeous love, or no matter what strong struggle, the society was so stone stubborn that it would never show any mercy for a kept woman. Just as Armond said, when God allow a kept woman to accept a real love, it is indeed a grant comfort, but also remorselepunishment, for the man holds the cruel authority to say to his lover, “ Your love is just a kind of commodity”, though the woman had devoted all her heart and spirits to her loves. It cannot denied that it was Marguerite’s joyous fortune to have Armond in her poor destiny, but at the same time, it is also have to be admitted that what a hopeletorture she tolerated and what a disappointed suffering she endured at the last part of her life. It was really too much to her. We even cannot tell what kind our feeling soared inside our bosom, but just happy with her, sad with her, waiting with her, wishing with her, and disappointed with her……

shall we criticize Armond for his foolish and brute deed to Marguerite as he got the same hurt by his horrible vengeance? Shall we condemn Armond, father for his selfish monologue which destroys the kind woman’s dream? Shall we judge the motionlemerchant and policemen’s actions before the dying woman?

Book Review: “Camille”

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800s, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armands father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armands reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumass last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?

I have never thought so thin a book which is called The Catcher in the Rye can influence me so much. It makes me feel very impressive. And after reading this book， I have aroused many thoughts about it.

In todays literature world， The Catcher in the Rye is to be recognized as a modern classic. After reading this book， adults can increase the understanding of teenagers; young people can increase the understanding of their future life. No matter whom after reading this book will improve their ability about to be vigilant against the reality. It also can make you choose one self-reliance way to your future easily.

This book told us a profound significance story. The of this novel Holden hated all the hypocritical things and really wanted to pursuit the pure reality at first. Because of the development of his society， he finally submits to the development process of the social reality. It deeply show the loneliness， loss， pain of younger generation which is grow up after the World War II in U.S.

Well， I think that though Holden used to seeing the reality of Bourgeois society， and he must promise with realistic society in the end， he also have many courage to have a try to rebel against the hypocritical world. This spirit should be set up if we want to improve the process of the world.

Now， we live in a country， which is in great reformation， and everything in the process of changing development. Well， with the development of our country; peoples thought also is in the change. At the same time， many peoples thoughts start confusion and depression. They forgotten their initial dreams and have no enthusiasm gradually. So， in the end， they began to yearn for mediocrity and have nothing to do.

Perhaps we can learn from this book to find our own shadow. To a certain extent that it reflects many characteristics of the adolescents， and we can also see the dark side of the society. With the materials progress， the spiritual world is inevitably producing some changes. At that time， what we need is a change which can make our dream into a reality. Therefore， what we should do is not to hope， not to wait， not to plain， but from now on， just start from your own efforts and watch your initial dream. Youd try your best to create the life you want with your own hands.

故事中女主角伊丽莎白第一眼看到男主角达西就是不顺眼的，加上男主角个性的傲慢，继而对他有了偏见。而男主角达西，是个不受人欢迎的傲慢男子，也不屑于周遭冷淡的人际关系，对他来说，傲慢也许是有理的，偏见却很无情，这两者产生的冲击是免不了的。两个人之间也因此而常有针锋相对的言辞，彼此之间的傲慢和偏见就造成了一开始的不愉快与误解，但是经过种.种事件的澄清，彼此又渐渐产生一点点的感情。达西代表着“傲慢”,伊丽莎白代表着“偏见”,他们一开始都被自己的情绪所牵引。接着一连串对达西不利的流言，更让伊丽莎白对达西反感。当达西向伊丽莎白求婚而遭到拒绝时，他说了一句话：“要是我耍一点手段，把我内心的矛盾掩饰起来，一味地恭维你，使你相信我无论在理智方面、思想方面以及其他各方面，都是对你怀着无条件的纯洁的爱，那么也许你就不会有这些苛刻的责骂了。可惜无论是什么样的伪装，我都痛恨。”达西没有为了讨好伊丽莎白，而改变他的傲慢性情。伊丽莎白也表现了很真实的自己，彼此都不刻意去营造给人的印象，表现出了最真实的一面。而开始的时候，伊丽莎白一直活在自己的偏见之下，而忽略思考事实的真相，经过达西的解释和自己的判定，才最终找到幸福的归宿。

傲慢与偏见，是我们很常见的弱点和毛病。每一个人其实都很轻易被自己的主观印象所驱使，因而轻易对别的人下不正确的注解，进而造成了彼此之间的误会。一个人所给予的第一印象固然可以影响到很多事，但并非一定不会改变，要有更加深入的了解，才能有更客观一点的论点，就似乎故事中女主角对达西的看法，就是因为了解才有所改变。因此，在现实生活中我们应该要善于发现身边人的优点!

《雾都孤儿》揭露许多当时的社会问题，如救济院、童工、以及帮派吸收青少年参与犯罪等。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing theirkindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell thosevermin-to-beto learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

---Book Review: “Camille”

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800s, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armands father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armands reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumass last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

在《傲慢与偏见》这部电影中，我很喜欢达西先生，他是一个很呆板中有着羞涩，傲慢中有着可爱的人。然而我想在这部片子中我最印象深刻的是伊丽莎白了。

伊丽莎白无疑是幸运的，除了她自身的优秀与自尊，她对爱情与婚姻的态度都决定着她的不凡，她能够坚守自己对爱情的渴望。对于一个女性而言，她拥有着天真率直以及理智自尊自爱，最重要的更是她的傲骨，她拒绝collins，这不仅是一种勇气也是一种对自身优秀的肯定。优秀的女人会被仰慕，被欣赏，有时也会被贬低，就如鲁迅先生捧与挖中说的一样，压下去，捧起来。虽然很多女性都有了觉醒，但依旧是不够的，对于剩女这个身份，很少有女性欣然接受，但正是剩下了，才是优秀中的优秀，毕竟男性不愿娶一个过于优于自己的女性，无论压还是捧，都不愿娶。

伊丽莎白的确是幸运的，如果自身的优异来源她本身，那么他父亲如此的了解她，也赞同她，就的确是一种运气了。我自始至终都认为班纳特先生最喜欢的一定是这个自信可爱聪明的二女儿，他开明，睿智，虽然有时迫于伊丽莎白母亲的施压，但关键时刻，重要之事，他都会做出最正确的判断，伊丽莎白拒绝collins的之后，他说，如果你不嫁给他，你会和你妈妈绝交。但是，如果你嫁给他，我就会给你绝交。当时真心爱死这个开明的父亲了，可爱，还有点冷幽默。

然而最庆幸的更是MRDary的存在，因为自己的优秀是自己决定的，有长者爱护是比较好得到的，然而要找一个欣赏自己，接受自己的伴侣确实一件难事，这让我想到人生下来就是注定孤独的，因为思想注定是孤独的，世界上没有两个完全相同的人，思想也没有，那么再是知音也不可能完全接纳理解自己。所以能找到一个比较相似的人，也是很不容易的，有的恋人当年爱的死去活来，最后还是一句不合适分手，要融入对方的世界其实很难，尤其是你陌生甚至带有一点排斥的世界。

达西是傲慢的，带有偏见的，伊丽莎白也是如此，正是这样有些相似，再加上价值观也没什么缺陷，于是他们幸福的在一起了，然而并不是所有的伊丽莎白都找的到配得上她的人，灰姑娘的外表高贵的心，这些公主有很多剩了下来。

相信自己，永远没有错。不愿委屈，不仅是孤高，更是爱护自己，自尊自爱自立自强不息。