傲慢与偏见读后感英文【热门20篇】

今早凌晨1:45正式熄灯，早8:15正式起床。

是因为看小说看得很晚。《傲慢与偏见》，简。奥斯汀。想象以后诸如此类的事情应不会少啊，但看的应该是课内书。

其中伊丽莎白和达西使我最喜欢的两个人。而简使我最想成为的人。我最喜欢的人物形象是达西，可能是由于我与性格与他有些相似的缘故吧。一开始，他给人的形象并不是那么的好，有一种瞧不起人的傲气，这可能与他看透了人与人的虚伪，所以觉得真正值得他欣赏的人实在是太少太少。可是从小说中其他的一些人物来看，他的感觉又不尝不是正确的呢?贝内特夫人及小说中的好几个人物形象都有势利卑微的毛病，而像贝内特家中的几个小姐妹粗俗放荡。正因为他善良真诚的品性，所以对于他所认识的人的品性有很高的要求。他很少说话，他说话时也总是带着评论家的语气，贝内特一家的几个姐妹在他眼中是没有高贵可言的，所以他的性格有一些偏激。非常自信的他在受到伊丽沙白的数落之后，逐渐明白了自己性格的弱点，所以后来也变很随和，而且说话做事彬彬有礼。他的性格的突变是爱的结果，爱的力量是巨大的，正是由于他对伊丽沙白的爱，爱的挫折使他认识到自己的弱点，从而实现了质的飞跃。他对爱情的观念由柯斯林变成了彬格莱。在生活中，有许多男子他们不也是有着许多这样或那样的缺点吗，可是他们总是固执己见，即使有了失败的爱情也不去分析自己的性格弱点，让爱情一次又一次地擦肩而过，这是多么的令人惋惜啊!

在重读名著傲慢与偏见前，写下这篇文，记录的，是我记忆中的傲慢与偏见。毫不怀疑重读后还会有新的惊艳，甚至再写读后感，因为一本好书是值得反复阅读的，每读一次都会带给你不同的感受。

简奥斯汀的作品这两年常常见诸于银幕，其生命力可见一斑。貌似简爱的作者夏洛蒂曾对她嗤之以鼻，总觉得这姑娘写着英国乡村屋檐下发生的琐碎小事，缺乏戏剧性和激情澎湃的赶脚。是的，如果说简爱像一曲奋进反抗的生命交响曲，傲慢与偏见就是一首悠闲细腻的田园小夜曲，个人有个人的爱，我更爱小夜曲。平凡人生虽然少了大风大浪的跌宕起伏，却更为平淡隽永，就像简奥斯汀借书中主人公之口表明的心迹，大意是说，城里来的人初到乡下还觉得新鲜，时日稍久就不耐烦了，觉得日子单调，人与人之间的交流总有新的话题，再小的空间也总也新的事物在发生，如果留意这有趣的一切，又怎么会觉得厌烦呢?所以她的文，总带着向上的朝气，让人不由自主地热爱生活，因为生活是多么生机勃勃的事情。

在傲慢与偏见中，开始时女主人公因为他人的诋毁和当事人的矜持高傲对当事人产生了非理性的偏见，直到后来在事态的发展中看清了事实真相，和当事人冰释误会，同时在摒弃前嫌，拿掉了有色眼镜后，发现了当事人可贵的品质和优秀的人格，正应了中国一句老话，日久见人心。她用了大量细腻的描绘来展现生活中的细节，这些细节勾勒出一个个活灵活现的人物，他们各自不同的背景，修养和思想，睿智的语言和风趣的调侃在文中随处可见，时时让人忍俊不住，没有说教，却充满生活哲理，让人有获益良多之感，不得不说，简奥斯汀可以说是有大智慧的人，虽然和我们不在同一时代，但她的很多处事信条至今仍然适用。

谈到傲慢与偏见，总要说到爱情。现在有很多关于爱情的命题，无非爱情重要还是生存重要之类的辩论。在傲慢与偏见中，钱一定是不可或缺的，志趣相投也同等重要，套用一句时髦的话来说，你是什么样的人就会吸引什么样的人前来。作者似乎热衷于对生活环境是否影响个人成长、个人品质如何在劣境中坚守等问题进行剖析，她的笔触总是很辛辣见底，离不开衣食住行，也赞美真爱的思想交流;恋人们必须正视现实洁身自爱，但是没有从相处中日久生情、有共同语言的那种显然也不合适。不激进，她看似略微矛盾的表述，却比别的女性文学更接地气。如果曾经被粗制滥造的言情搞得迷失方向，正可以借简奥斯汀的作品来洗重生。细读慢品傲慢与偏见的字里行间，有高贵的坚韧，也有邂逅的惊喜。或许作者想说的是，感谢生活赐予的机会，不强求也不懦弱，美好的情感永远是值得人们珍惜的。

《傲慢与偏见》是奥斯汀的代表作。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世 纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。这部社会风情画式的小说不仅在当时吸引着广大的读者，时至今日，仍给读者以独特的艺术享受。

奥斯汀在这部小说中通过班纳特五个女儿对待终身大事的不同处理，表现出乡镇中产阶级家庭出身的少女对婚姻此文来源于文秘家园情问题的不同态度，从而反映了 作者本人的婚姻观：为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的;而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。因此，她既反对为金钱而结婚，也反对把婚姻当儿戏。她强调理想 婚姻的重要性，并把男女双方感情作为缔结理想婚姻的基石。书中的女主人公伊丽莎白出身于小地主家庭，为富豪此文来源于文秘家园弟达西所热此文来源于文秘家 园。达西不顾门第和财富的差距，向她求婚，却遭到拒绝。伊丽莎白对他的误会和偏见是一个原因，但主要的是她讨厌他的傲慢。因为达西的这种傲慢实际上是地位 差异的反映，只要存在这种傲慢，他与伊丽莎白之间就不可能有共同的思想感情，也不可能有理想的婚姻。以后伊丽莎白亲眼观察了达西的为人处世和一系列所作所 为，特别是看到他改变了过去那种骄傲自负的神态，消除了对他的误会和偏见，从而与他缔结了美满姻缘。伊丽莎白对达西先后几次求婚的不同态度，实际上反映了 女性对人格独立和平等权利的追求。这是伊丽莎白这一人物形象的进步意义。

从小说看，伊丽莎白聪敏机智，有胆识，有远见，有很强的自尊心，并善于思考问题。就当时一个待嫁闺中的小姐来讲，这是难能可贵的。正是由于这种品质，才使她在此文来源于文秘家园情问题上有独立的主见，并导致她与达西组成美满的家庭。

在《傲慢与偏见》中，奥斯汀还写了伊丽莎白的几个姐妹和女友的婚事，这些都是陪衬，用来与女主人公理想的婚姻相对照。如夏绿蒂和柯林斯尽管婚后过着舒适的物质生活，但他们之间没有此文来源于文秘家园情，这种婚姻实际上是掩盖在华丽外衣下的社会悲剧。

One hundred and sixty years ago,when Charlotte Bronte created Jane Eyre,she could have never thought that it would become eternal.As a matter of fact, in the world of today,there are tens of thousands of Jane Eyre,each living in a readers heart,breathing with him the same air and sharing with him the same happiness and sorrow.Her rich mental world has become an inexhaustible resource of spirtual power.From Jane Eyre,people who are timid and shy get confidence and self-respect;people who feel imprisoned get independence and freedom;people who are lonesome get love and care.However, what I get from Jane Eyre is the courage of inner qestioning and self-exploring.

Jane Eyre is a young orphan being raised by Mrs. Reed, her cruel, wealthy aunt. A servant named Bessie provides Jane with some of the few kindnesses she receives, telling her stories and singing songs to her. One day, as punishment for fighting with her bullying cousin John Reed, Jane’s aunt imprisons Jane in the red-room, the room in which Jane’s Uncle Reed died. While locked in, Jane, believing that she sees her uncle’s ghost, screams and faints. She wakes to find herself in the care of Bessie and the kindly apothecary Mr. Lloyd, who suggests to Mrs. Reed that Jane be sent away to school. To Jane’s delight, Mrs. Reed concurs.

Once at the Lowood School, Jane finds that her life is far from idyllic. The school’s headmaster is Mr. Brocklehurst, a cruel, hypocritical, and abusive man. Brocklehurst preaches a doctrine of poverty and privation to his students while using the school’s funds to provide a wealthy and opulent lifestyle for his own family. At Lowood, Jane befriends a young girl named Helen Burns, whose strong, martyrlike attitude toward the school’s miseries is both helpful and displeasing to Jane. A massive typhus epidemic sweeps Lowood, and Helen dies of consumption. The epidemic also results in the departure of Mr. Brocklehurst by attracting attention to the insalubrious conditions at Lowood. After a group of more sympathetic gentlemen takes Brocklehurst’s place, Jane’s life improves dramatically. She spends eight more years at Lowood, six as a student and two as a teacher.

After teaching for two years, Jane yearns for new experiences. She accepts a governess position at a manor called Thornfield, where she teaches a lively French girl named Adèle. The distinguished housekeeper Mrs. Fairfax presides over the estate. Jane’s employer at Thornfield is a dark, impassioned man named Rochester, with whom Jane finds herself falling secretly in love. She saves Rochester from a fire one night, which he claims was started by a drunken servant named Grace Poole. But because Grace Poole continues to work at Thornfield, Jane concludes that she has not been told the entire story. Jane sinks into despondency when Rochester brings home a beautiful but vicious woman named Blanche Ingram. Jane expects Rochester to propose to Blanche. But Rochester instead proposes to Jane, who accepts almost disbelievingly.

The wedding day arrives, and as Jane and Mr. Rochester prepare to exchange their vows, the voice of Mr. Mason cries out that Rochester already has a wife. Mason introduces himself as the brother of that wife—a woman named Bertha. Mr. Mason testifies that Bertha, whom Rochester married when he was a young man in Jamaica, is still alive. Rochester does not deny Mason’s claims, but he explains that Bertha has gone mad. He takes the wedding party back to Thornfield, where they witness the insane Bertha Mason scurrying around on all fours and growling like an animal. Rochester keeps Bertha hidden on the third story of Thornfield and pays Grace Poole to keep his wife under control. Bertha was the real cause of the mysterious fire earlier in the story. Knowing that it is impossible for her to be with Rochester, Jane flees Thornfield.

Penniless and hungry, Jane is forced to sleep outdoors and beg for food. At last, three siblings who live in a manor alternatively called Marsh End and Moor House take her in. Their names are Mary, Diana, and St. John (pronounced “Sinjin”) Rivers, and Jane quickly becomes friends with them. St. John is a clergyman, and he finds Jane a job teaching at a charity school in Morton. He surprises her one day by declaring that her uncle, John Eyre, has died and left her a large fortune: 20,000 pounds. When Jane asks how he received this news, he shocks her further by declaring that her uncle was also his uncle: Jane and the Riverses are cousins. Jane immediately decides to share her inheritance equally with her three newfound relatives.

St. John decides to travel to India as a missionary, and he urges Jane to accompany him—as his wife. Jane agrees to go to India but refuses to marry her cousin because she does not love him. St. John pressures her to reconsider, and she nearly gives in. However, she realizes that she cannot abandon forever the man she truly loves when one night she hears Rochester’s voice calling her name over the moors. Jane immediately hurries back to Thornfield and finds that it has been burned to the ground by Bertha Mason, who lost her life in the fire. Rochester saved the servants but lost his eyesight and one of his hands. Jane travels on to Rochester’s new residence, Ferndean, where he lives with two servants named John and Mary.

At Ferndean, Rochester and Jane rebuild their relationship and soon marry. At the end of her story, Jane writes that she has been married for ten blissful years and that she and Rochester enjoy perfect equality in their life together. She says that after two years of blindness, Rochester regained sight in one eye and was able to behold their first son at his birth.

Actually,not only do I inspired by Jane Eyres character,but also I am moved by the love of Rochester.I believe that every one of us may have thought about our Mr.Right after reading this book.He doesnt need to be so handsome .However,he must be good to us and take our things as the most important things.Yes, we are all expecting...

《傲慢与偏见》是奥斯汀的作品，当我还是17岁时我就大概了解了它，而仅仅限于了解，这就是说我只明白它是描述感情的。想想看，此刻我20岁了，直到昨日我才把这部作品看完，可是我也难以断定我从此就读懂了它，和它交上了朋友。这样说来，我仰慕它确实有这么长的时间了。

好比一个景点，入口处能引人入胜的话，那确实能给游客带来无限的遐想和憧憬。“凡是有钱的单身汉，总想娶位太太，这已经成了一条举世公认的真理。这样的单身汉，每逢新搬到一个地方，四邻八舍虽然完全不了解他的性情如何，见解如何，可是，既然这样的一条真理早已在人们心目中根深蒂固，所以人们总是把他看作自我某一个女儿理所应得的一笔财产。”就这样开了个头，一个有着五个单身女儿的家族是如何将女儿们嫁出去的故事就接连着展开了。讽刺而幽默的笔触，营造了整篇的简便氛围，我想挺适合在这个鸟叫蝉鸣的暑假里来消遣时光，更何况再过几天就是七夕了呢!

就感情主题来说，女主人公伊丽莎小姐和男主人公达西先生的结合是比较富有故事性的，“首因效应”(人们交往时往往第一印象会给人带来先入为主的效果)使伊丽莎小姐认为达西先生是个自高自大、傲慢无礼的家伙，而这个评价就当时舞会上达西先生的表现来说，也并没有冤枉他。“她还能够，但还没有漂亮到打动我的心，眼前我可没有兴趣去抬举那些受到别人冷眼看待的小姐。”换做是任何一个单身小姐，听到一个陌生男人这样含沙射影般地评价，都会生厌，何况伊丽莎小姐是个有着明亮眼睛的聪明善良而聪明的女人。自此，“傲慢”便成为达西先生的代名词，当然，至少在伊丽莎小姐前期的心中是这样认为的。而这个标签是否就是合情合理的呢当然，随着故事的发展，“偏见”也越发冒头了，当伊丽莎小姐拜访了达西先生的庄园起，她就意识到自我对达西先生确实缺乏公正了。能够说，是“偏见”的消解促成了他们的幸福。伊丽莎小姐存在偏见，而达西先生又何尝没有偏见呢他看不惯她父母亲的行为举止，也看不上她家的地位和财势，尤其是她家还有几个穷亲戚，而除了她和她姐姐吉英外，她的三个妹妹他都有或多或少的不满意。于是，他就越发傲慢了，更做出了妨碍她姐姐吉英和彬格莱先生的感情的事情。

就社会性来说，小说的讽刺之剑透过几对眷侣的终成击中了社会的某些风尚和流弊，而这也正增加了小说的社会意义，不至于与我先前所说的“纯情小说”同流。虽说伊丽莎小姐和达西先生的感情婚姻是以美满幸福结束，但他们在交往过程中的傲慢和偏见的构成正反应出社会的一些问题。当班纳特太太一心一意只为财产地位着想而不顾女儿们的真正幸福时的丑态，在让人捧腹之余，又生发出许多心酸。当婚姻成为攀附权贵的阶梯时，感情的影子在哪里柯斯牧师和卢卡斯小姐的婚姻，想想就不可思议，他们两个都是“聪明人”，在婚姻的路上研究得“面面俱到”，结果就干成了如此蠢事。如果说他们俩是有思想有见地的成年人，那韦翰先生和莉迪雅小姐的婚姻简直就是一场骗局、一场寻欢作乐的游戏。

小说在人物塑造方面采取的是单性描述，并不是多重矛盾性格的复杂描述，“一就永远是一”.吉英小姐单纯善良，一个贤良淑德形象，永远不会认为想到某人某事的阴暗面;伊丽莎白聪明活泼又独立，一个智慧女人形象，永远有自我的想法和原则;曼丽虽说描述不多，但其学术才女的形象跃然纸上，一切都是从书上得来的东西来解释生活;吉蒂和莉迪雅小姐是未成年，自有一种幼稚的疯狂女生特质。这五个女儿的形象如此，而其他人也是描述得极为成功的，虽然免不了有种单调的感觉，甚至于就整个故事情节来说，也比较直接，没有九曲回肠的曲折美，但这也或许就是奥斯汀本小说的特色吧。

我很久以前就有机会看《傲慢与偏见》，但说句心里话，当时我并不认为这本书有多好，甚至只看了个开头就放到了一边，心想：语言如此贫乏，故事又无激动人心之处，怎么会成为世界名著呢?

这次我是在偶然间弄到这本书，由于书的主人极力推荐，我满腹狐疑，才决定看完之后再对此书下一个自己的定论。这种想法推动下，我花了一些睡觉时间将它看完，于是对它的看法大为改观(当然，假如一点好感都没有，那我也就没那种耐心用睡觉时间来看它了)。

不过，我这里所谓的改观，并非指完完全全、彻彻底底地改变了原先的看法。我所谓的改观，是指现在才发现它并非毫无优点。

先说说我发现的优点吧。从风格上看，它有与众不同之处，这是毫无疑问的，大多数书都是从男性的角度看世界，即使是《简·爱》和《呼啸山庄》，也基本上从男性的角度来写，而《傲慢与偏见》则明显地充满了女性思想色彩，包括世界观及生活方式。这一点在写作内容上得到最好体现：假如是男作家，写出的作品大多具有惊险色彩(只是强弱一些的问题)，而本书中，最激动人心的一段也不过是威克姆与伊丽莎白之妹私奔(而且结局并不悲惨)，作者能想到的最恶劣的行径，也只是一些人与人之间的简单欺骗;贯穿全文的一件事就是母亲如何嫁女儿。这一系列的事实，都表现了这本书的女性化，而这类书在那个时代当然极少，所以我认为这是本书极大的成功之处。

一部好的小说应当可以反映一个时代的风貌，就这一点而言，此书也表现得相当成功。读了这本书，头脑中不难形成当时欧洲女性社会的状况——所有女子都以嫁出去作为一种荣誉，而不管嫁给谁，婚娶成了妇女唯一的人生目标，真正的感情既少见，又难以被理解，作者深刻揭露与批判的正是这些。

谈到缺点，我想与其他书作比较：就运用语言的能力而言，它不及《基督山伯爵》;就故事的曲折丰富性而言，它不及《乱世佳人》;就表现社会现实的高度而言，它不及《钢铁是怎样炼成的》;就人物心理描写而言，它不及《呼啸山庄》。虽然这些缺陷很大程度上是由它要描写的社会现实决定的，但一本名著出现这么多的漏洞，毕竟是太过分了。

读完这本书，我极想将它与《乱世佳人》进行完全深入的对比。这两本书在故事内容，情节发展上太相似了，就连人物选取也如出一辙：达西对应瑞德，伊丽莎白对应斯佳丽，宾利对应维希礼，简对应媚兰。前两者间关系都由感情封冻到暖化，再到热烈;后两者的感情则始终如一。唯一不同之处是，前者以和平为背景，后者以战争为背景。所以我将《傲慢与偏见》称为和平版《乱世佳人》，试想，让宾利处在乱世，他必然会与维希礼一样落魄。相反，维希礼在开始时也是十分体面的绅士。

但在感情的激烈斗争与转化上，《傲慢与偏见》完全无法与《乱世佳人》对比，《乱世佳人》以战争为背景，那么感情冲突自然容易表现，尤其是战争的宏大场面(例如亚特兰大溃退，北军围城)，这一幕幕都是如此激动人心，以至于读者难以释卷。这些对《傲慢与偏见》来说是无法达到的艺术效果。对整场战争及战后的社会问题，《乱世佳人》也都表现得很成功，于是这本书的境界也就由儿女私情升华为对国家、对社会的深刻思索，这些也是《傲慢与偏见》的匮乏的东西。

从整本书的艺术性来看，《傲慢与偏见》的确不及《乱世佳人》。但这在深刻思索后的确不难发现，也不难理解。奥斯丁作为女作家，并无太多人赞同(当时社会意识就认为女子无法写小说)，这当然造成了女作家在许多写作才能上不及男作家(例如世界观及知识的丰富性)。尽管我可以原谅这些不足，但相对于同样的女作家夏洛蒂与艾米莉，奥斯丁也显然有这些方面不足。所以至今我还坚信，《傲慢与偏见》的确有许多过人之处，但毛姆将它列为世界十大著名小说之一就未免言过其实了。

读了《傲慢与偏见》给我带来了很深的感触。

本片主角是班纳特家的五个女儿，势利眼的母亲一见到富家公子宾利和达西前来小镇，便逼不及待安排女儿钓金龟。大女儿跟宾利的爱情开始发展得很顺利，但在关键时刻却产生了波折。而女儿伊莉莎白则对态度高傲的达西存有严重的偏见，两人明明相爱却不断在言语中剌痛对方。幸好最后误会冰释，五个女儿都有了好结果。

从这个发生在英国的.情故事，男主角傲慢，女主角偏见，两人经历了很多的悲欢离合，终于排除了以前的误解，走到一起，过上幸福快乐的日.的故事中，我们可以看到的是什么呢?--人性，尊严，.情...

奥斯汀在这部小说中通过班纳特五个女儿对待终身大事的不同处理，表现出乡镇中产阶级家庭出身的少女对婚姻.情问题的不同态度，从而反映了作者本人的婚姻观：为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的;而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。因此，她既反对为金钱而结婚，也反对把婚姻当儿戏。她强调理想婚姻的重要性，并把男女双方感情作为缔结理想婚姻的基石。书中的女主人公伊丽莎白出身于小地主家庭，为富豪.弟达西所热.。达西不顾门第和财富的差距，向她求婚，却遭到拒绝。伊丽莎白对他的误会和偏见是一个原因，但主要的是她讨厌他的傲慢。因为达西的这种傲慢实际上是地位差异的反映，只要存在这种傲慢，他与伊丽莎白之间就不可能有共同的思想感情，也不可能有理想的婚姻。以后伊丽莎白亲眼观察了达西的为人处世和一系列所作所为，特别是看到他改变了过去那种骄傲自负的神态，消除了对他的误会和偏见，从而与他缔结了美满姻缘。伊丽莎白对达西先后几次求婚的不同态度，实际上反映了女性对人格独立和平等权利的追求。这是伊丽莎白这一人物形象的进步意义。

从小说看，伊丽莎白聪敏机智，有胆识，有远见，有很强的自尊心，并善于思考问题。就当时一个待嫁闺中的小姐来讲，这是难能可贵的。正是由于这种品质，才使她在.情问题上有独立的主见，并导致她与达西组成美满的家庭。

整部作品没有滂沱的气势，没有曲折跌宕的情节，但就是这种简单，至今深深地吸引着我们。奥斯汀短暂的一生几乎都是在英国的乡间度过的，也许就是周围朴素，宁静的氛围孕育了她淡然的气质。并不能因为没有丰富的经历，就对她的对于事物的分析能力有所怀疑，读过〈傲慢与偏见〉的人一定会为她细腻、敏锐的情感所折服。在写〈傲慢与偏见〉时，她只是一个十几岁的女孩，难道这不是一种天赋吗?她的确很少接触“外界”，但思想存在，想象存在，这一切的存在就足够。

《傲慢与偏见》是一部非常优秀的小说，也是我看过的最喜欢的书籍。

导语：《狂蟒之灾》在蜿蜒流长的亚马逊河流域的雨林深处，生活着古老而神秘的舒尔族。他们与世隔绝，以食人蛇为叩拜图腾。围绕着舒尔族人的传说和秘密让雨淋之外的人们振奋不已。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

Every preconceived notion audiences might have about "Anaconda" is correct. This supposed serpentine shocker features doomed adventurers wading through murky water while a deadly snake approaches and "Jaws"-like music throbs. The plot retraces a formula employed by countless predecessors to kill off its supporting characters in a predictable sequence. And theres the bad guy with the foreign accent, and the requisite romance between handsome anthropologist and shapely journalist. Its all here, as is an ironic comfort in watching such a well-worn tale from the dark side.

Dr. Steven Cale (Eric Stoltz) is heading down the Amazon in search of an undocumented Indian tribe. Joining him is Terri Flores ("Selenas" Jennifer Lopez), a filmmaker charged with recording Dr. Cales quest. Ten minutes into their voyage, snaky Paul Sarone (Jon Voight) jumps aboard and commandeers the boat to begin a Captain Ahab-style hunt for his gigantic underwater nemesis: the titular anaconda upon whose nonexistent shoulders this movie rests. Despite satisfactory performances from the cast, the films human characters remain secondary to this nasty snake and the special effects that created it.

Scary, this movie isnt. The faux serpent, albeit an impressive creature, looks wholly unrealistic as it zips through water and air like a Saturday morning cartoon character. And such schlocky touches as the anacondas penchant for regurgitation are more gross (and funny) than frightening. What chills there are spring more from standard stalk-and-startle techniques than from the creepy characteristics associated with snakes. Director Luis Llosa ("The Specialist") shot "Anaconda" in Brazil, and the tropical setting imbues his movie with much-needed authenticity and cinematic richness. Llosa advances the story at an absorbing clip that never bores the audience, and he wisely eschews any high-minded discourse about good and evil. As cheesy, predictable horror flicks go, "Anaconda" squeezes considerable life from its limited aspirations.

同夏洛蒂·勃朗特一样，奥斯丁也是牧师的女儿，奥斯丁从小和家人住在父亲任职教区的牧师住宅里，度过的安定、祥和的童年。由于早年受教于父亲，奥斯丁从中获得了广博的知识和良好的修养。虽然她的一生如此短暂，但，就生命的高度而言，奥斯丁的确创造了自己的奇迹。她的小说，都是经过反复的修改后才正式成文的。而《傲慢与偏见》的成就也正是对她的肯定。

虽然这篇小说的主要篇幅都是谈婚论嫁，却并不同于一般的爱情小说。就我个人而言，更倾向于把它定位为世态小说。正如众多的世态小说一样，奥斯丁的《傲慢与偏见》也带有通俗浅显的特点，但其最终能够脱颖而出，却不是偶然的。“精心选择的语言”和“机智幽默”代表了《傲慢与偏见》艺术形式方面的本质。奥斯丁曾说，她创造小说，像是用一支又尖又细的画笔，在小小的一块象牙上轻描慢绘。而我，对于这点，在看完这部小说后，有着深刻的体会。奥斯丁善于通过幽默讽刺的对话表现人物的性格特点。因而，在我看完小说后，感觉书中的每一个人物都给我留下了很深刻的印象。

在众多人物当中，首先吸引我注意的是美丽温柔的简。当然，不得不说，她让我想到了和她性格很像的一个人，我的姐姐。总是那么温柔，善良。从一开始，我便对她有了一定的好感。当宾利先生出现的时候，我真心为他们祝福，希望他们可以幸福。只是，他们为何那样缺乏自信。明明相爱的两个人，却因为羞涩、缺乏自信而不能正视自己内心的渴望，勇敢得追求属于自己的幸福。明明相爱的两个人，却险些因为误解而错过。他们太善良了，而善良的附属品往往是软弱。好在，最后的结局是令人欣慰的。

主人公伊丽莎白和达西先生之间的爱情，可谓是经历了重重困难。我对达西的认识，也紧随着伊丽莎白的感情而逐渐变化。诚然，从一开始，傲慢的达西先生并不十分令人欢迎，甚至，的确是让人讨厌。伊丽莎白对他的偏见也由此而展开。并随着小说情节的发展，更加深了彼此之间的误会。男主人公达西的傲慢和女主人公伊丽莎白的偏见，都带有明显的阶级性。因而，误会并非出于一系列的偶然，而是由于他们不同的阶级地位所造成的。生活在上流社会的达西，有着显赫的地位。他的这一份傲气是可以被理解的。但最终他们克服了障碍，幸福的在一起。暂且抛开当时特定的社会背景，就小说本身而言，我很欣赏小说中的男女主人公。

伊丽莎白有着自己独特的见解和胆识，敢于追求自己的幸福，这就使她避免因屈服于现实和虚荣心，而成为婚姻的奴隶，正如她的好朋友夏洛特那样。达西更固然有着傲慢的本性，但并不足以阻止他成为一个受欢迎的人。更何况，他又有着那么多可贵的品质。当他意识到自己与伊丽莎白之间的误会时，选择了把问题解释清楚，还原真相的同时，也证明了自己的清白。达西欣赏伊丽莎白的率真，也原谅了她。他用理性的眼光看待周围的人和事，并不因为本内特太太的无理、莉迪亚的轻狂而影响到他对伊丽莎白的感情。

与此同时，他更是默默地帮助了本内特一家人。正如达西自己所说，他做的这些都是为了她。因为爱她，达西先生不顾祖母凯瑟琳的阻止，选择了和自己社会地位并不相当的伊丽莎白。

我欣赏伊丽莎白和达西的那一份真诚，他们并没有因为讨好彼此而改变自己最纯真的本性，也不刻意去营造或者伪装自己给别人的印象，而总是展示自己最真实的一面。伊丽莎白和达西，简和宾利先生之间的爱情，都与夏洛特和柯林斯不同，不是因结婚而结婚，更不是建立在纯粹以金钱和物质享受的基础上。他们是彼此相爱的，他们相信，依靠品德而结合的爱情，才能永久、幸福。而作为柯林斯夫人的夏洛特，不得不忍受丈夫种种不好的行为，凭借物质力量获得的尊重和羡慕，并不能让她真正的幸福。这两种截然不同的爱情观，渗透了人类历史发展的过程。

人生如此短暂，如果仅仅是一味的追求物质欲望的满足，纵有家财万贯，精神世界却空虚贫乏，最终不能感悟到生命的真谛。其实，傲慢与偏见，都是我们人性中很常见的弱点。在现实的人际交往中，我们往往会因为第一印象，而主观地给别人下定义，造成彼此之间的误解。只有在长久的观察和接触之后，才能对人有较为深入客观的了解和认识。正如小说中的男女主人公一样，正是因为了解而改变。小说中本内特太太可是贯穿全文的一个重要角色。我承认，她并不是一个贤惠的妻子，也不是一个体贴的母亲。她的一举一动总会引起别人的反感。可以说，她主要以负面形象存在。但有一点却是不容置疑的，她是爱她的孩子们的。

虽然她的做法总是不被人理解，甚至过于神经，但他所做的这些都是为自己的女儿们着想，希望她们都能有个好的归宿。其实，在当时特殊的社会背景下，她的行为又似乎是可以被理解的。我想，不仅是在爱情和婚姻方面，做人理应如此，不管对谁，不卑不亢，凭自己的人格魅力和优秀品质，去赢得他人的尊敬。或许，这才是“对人性最透彻的了解”的意义所在。

"The gift of the magi" tells a story like this: in order to buy a platinum fob chain for her husband as a Christmas gift, his wife, sold a head of show hair. And her husband for the same purpose, sold the ancestral gold watch for his wife bought a set of combs. Although each others gift lost use value, but they get more important things than feelings, love, is priceless.

After reading it, I ask: arent rich couple, but it can in the ordinary day make such a remarkable thing: for the sake of each other, regardless of their completely. It is because they love each other, so would do such extraordinary things. By contrast, how much I pay for others? In life, I always for a little dispute, with others, haggle over every ounce, finally do more harm than good, bad credibility instead, why dont I learn from them, care about each other, and what is bad? I should really reflect on yourself.

"Lover one constant love", only care about each other and love each other, for the sake of others, the world wouldnt be so indifferent and cold.

《麦琪的礼物》讲述了一个这样的故事：为了给丈夫买一条白金表链作为圣诞礼物，妻子卖掉了一头秀发。而丈夫出于同样目的，卖掉了祖传的金表给妻子买了一套发梳。尽管彼此的礼物都失去了使用价值，但他们从中获得比情感更重要的东西——爱，却是无价的。

读完之后，我深有感触：一对并不富有的夫妇，却能在平凡的一天做出这样一件不平凡的事情：为对方着想，完全不顾自己。正是因为他们互相爱着对方，所以才会做出这样不平凡的事情。相比之下，我为别人付出的又有多少呢?在生活中，我总是为了一点小纠纷，与别人针锋相对，斤斤计较，最后得不偿失，反而坏了信誉，我何不学学他们，互相关心，又有什么不好呢?我应该认真反思自己。

“爱人者人恒爱之”，只有互相关心、互相关爱，为他人着想，世界才不会这么冷漠、无情了。

故事中女主角伊丽莎白第一眼看到男主角达西就是不顺眼的，加上男主角个性的傲慢，继而对他有了偏见。而男主角达西，是个不受人欢迎的傲慢男子，也不屑于周遭冷淡的人际关系，对他来说，傲慢也许是有理的，偏见却很无情，这两者产生的冲击是免不了的。两个人之间也因此而常有针锋相对的言辞，彼此之间的傲慢和偏见就造成了一开始的不愉快与误解，但是经过种.种事件的澄清，彼此又渐渐产生一点点的感情。达西代表着“傲慢”,伊丽莎白代表着“偏见”,他们一开始都被自己的情绪所牵引。接着一连串对达西不利的流言，更让伊丽莎白对达西反感。当达西向伊丽莎白求婚而遭到拒绝时，他说了一句话：“要是我耍一点手段，把我内心的矛盾掩饰起来，一味地恭维你，使你相信我无论在理智方面、思想方面以及其他各方面，都是对你怀着无条件的纯洁的爱，那么也许你就不会有这些苛刻的责骂了。可惜无论是什么样的伪装，我都痛恨。”达西没有为了讨好伊丽莎白，而改变他的傲慢性情。伊丽莎白也表现了很真实的自己，彼此都不刻意去营造给人的印象，表现出了最真实的一面。而开始的时候，伊丽莎白一直活在自己的偏见之下，而忽略思考事实的真相，经过达西的解释和自己的判定，才最终找到幸福的归宿。

傲慢与偏见，是我们很常见的弱点和毛病。每一个人其实都很轻易被自己的主观印象所驱使，因而轻易对别的人下不正确的注解，进而造成了彼此之间的误会。一个人所给予的第一印象固然可以影响到很多事，但并非一定不会改变，要有更加深入的了解，才能有更客观一点的论点，就似乎故事中女主角对达西的看法，就是因为了解才有所改变。因此，在现实生活中我们应该要善于发现身边人的优点!

Elizabeth resourcefulness, have courage, visionary, have very strong self-respect, and be good at thinking. It is because of this quality, just make her have independent opinion on the emotional problems, and prompted her and the darcy composition content family.

Books as the name implies, pride and prejudice, and in the book is male leading the obstacle of the love, but in the real society is also a communication barriers between people, but also in the right attitude towards themselves, treat things in a stumbling block. In real life, we will also often because of his unilateral idea but myself with others, so we have to overcome the "pride and prejudice", take the initiative to understand others. Each person actually are easy to be driven by their own subjective impression, and therefore easy to incorrect comment on other people, thus caused the misunderstanding between each other. A man give first impression is can affect many things, but not must not change, want to have a more in-depth understanding, in order to have a more objective point argument, just like the heroine of the story of darcys view, is because understanding just change. The book reaction of social reality is so hit the nail on the head, she is about marriage, has nothing to do with love.

伊丽莎白聪敏机智，有胆识，有远见，有很强的自尊心，并善于思考问题。正是由于这种品质，才使她在情感问题上有独立的主见，并促使她与达西组成美满的家庭。

书如其名，傲慢与偏见，在书中是男女主角爱情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。在现实生活中，我们也会经常因为自己单方面的想法而是自己与他人隔开，所以我们要克服“傲慢与偏见”，主动了解他人。每一个人其实都很容易被自己的主观印象所驱使，因而容易对别的人下不正确的注解，进而造成了彼此之间的误会。一个人所给予的第一印象固然可以影响到很多事，但并非一定不会改变，要有更加深入的了解，才能有更客观一点的论点，就好像故事中女主角对达西的看法，就是因为了解才有所改变。此书反应的社会现实确是如此一针见血，她讲的是婚姻，与爱情无关。

奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》，正如她自己所说，是在两寸象牙上细细的雕刻，它是奥斯汀的代表作。这部反映婚姻问题的小说是作者作品中最受欢迎的一部，也是她本人最喜欢的作品。作品生动的反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。其社会风情化似的小说不仅在当时吸引着广大的读者，时至今日，仍给读者以独特的艺术享受。她是第一个现实地描绘日常平凡生活的小说家，在英国小说史上起了承上启下的作用。

整部作品没有滂沱的气势，没有曲折跌宕的情节，但就是这种简单，至今深深地吸引着我们。奥斯汀短暂的一生几乎都是在英国的乡间度过的，也许就是周围朴素，宁静的氛围孕育了她淡然的气质。并不能因为没有丰富的经历，就对她的对于事物的分析能力有所怀疑，读过〈傲慢与偏见〉的人一定会为她细腻、敏锐的情感所折服。在写〈傲慢与偏见〉时，她只是一个十几岁的女孩，难道这不是一种天赋吗?她的确很少接触“外界”，但思想存在，想象存在，这一切的存在就足够。

不知为何，“纯情小说”之类的东西已经不能勾起我丝毫的兴趣，也许我会在某个花好月圆之夜，触景生情而冲动地去翻开一本“纯情小说”的第一页，然而，我很难保证我会读到第三页。何为“纯情小说”?在个人看来，就是那些为写爱情而写爱情的矫情之作，通篇下来，只是看到男女主人公尽做些无聊至极之事，而这些情节又常常让人发笑，笑过后只是会让人断定作者和主人公们一样低智商、低趣味。所以，怀着对爱情的美好憧憬，我会在一大堆小说中留意着描写爱情故事的小说，但有怀着它不要让我失望的强烈希冀。毕竟，我一向相信爱情，超过婚姻的相信。

《傲慢与偏见》是奥斯汀的作品，当我还是17岁时我就大概了解了它，而仅仅限于了解，这就是说我只知道它是描写爱情的。想想看，现在我20岁了，直到昨天我才把这部作品看完，不过我也难以断定我从此就读懂了它，和它交上了朋友。这样说来，我仰慕它确实有这么长的时间了。

好比一个景点，入口处能引人入胜的话，那确实能给游客带来无限的遐想和憧憬。“凡是有钱的单身汉，总想娶位太太，这已经成了一条举世公认的真理。这样的单身汉，每逢新搬到一个地方，四邻八舍虽然完全不了解他的性情如何，见解如何，可是，既然这样的一条真理早已在人们心目中根深蒂固，因此人们总是把他看作自己某一个女儿理所应得的一笔财产。”就这样开了个头，一个有着五个单身女儿的家族是如何将女儿们嫁出去的故事就接连着展开了。讽刺而幽默的笔触，营造了整篇的轻松氛围，我想挺适合在这个鸟叫蝉鸣的暑假里来消遣时光，更何况再过几天就是七夕了呢!

就爱情主题来说，女主人公伊丽莎小姐和男主人公达西先生的结合是比较富有故事性的，“首因效应”(人们交往时往往第一印象会给人带来先入为主的效果)使伊丽莎小姐认为达西先生是个自高自大、傲慢无礼的家伙，而这个评价就当时舞会上达西先生的表现来说，也并没有冤枉他。“她还可以，但还没有漂亮到打动我的心，眼前我可没有兴趣去抬举那些受到别人冷眼看待的小姐。”换做是任何一个单身小姐，听到一个陌生男人这样含沙射影般地评价，都会生厌，何况伊丽莎小姐是个有着明亮眼睛的聪明善良而聪明的女人。自此，“傲慢”便成为达西先生的代名词，当然，至少在伊丽莎小姐前期的心中是这样认为的。而这个标签是否就是合情合理的呢?当然，随着故事的发展，“偏见”也越发冒头了，当伊丽莎小姐拜访了达西先生的庄园起，她就意识到自己对达西先生确实缺乏公正了。可以说，是“偏见”的消解促成了他们的幸福。伊丽莎小姐存在偏见，而达西先生又何尝没有偏见呢?他看不惯她父母亲的行为举止，也看不上她家的地位和财势，尤其是她家还有几个穷亲戚，而除了她和她姐姐吉英外，她的三个妹妹他都有或多或少的不满意。于是，他就越发傲慢了，更做出了妨碍她姐姐吉英和彬格莱先生的爱情的事情。

就社会性来说，小说的讽刺之剑透过几对眷侣的终成击中了社会的某些风尚和流弊，而这也正增加了小说的社会意义，不至于与我先前所说的“纯情小说”同流。虽说伊丽莎小姐和达西先生的爱情婚姻是以美满幸福结束，但他们在交往过程中的傲慢和偏见的形成正反应出社会的一些问题。当班纳特太太一心一意只为财产地位着想而不顾女儿们的真正幸福时的丑态，在让人捧腹之余，又生发出许多心酸。当婚姻成为攀附权贵的阶梯时，爱情的影子在哪里?柯斯牧师和卢卡斯小姐的婚姻，想想就不可思议，他们两个都是“聪明人”,在婚姻的路上考虑得“面面俱到”,结果就干成了如此蠢事。如果说他们俩是有思想有见地的成年人，那韦翰先生和莉迪雅小姐的婚姻简直就是一场骗局、一场寻欢作乐的游戏。

小说在人物塑造方面采取的是单性描写，并不是多重矛盾性格的复杂描写，“一就永远是一”.吉英小姐单纯善良，一个贤良淑德形象，永远不会认为想到某人某事的阴暗面;伊丽莎白聪明活泼又独立，一个智慧女人形象，永远有自己的想法和原则;曼丽虽说描写不多，但其学术才女的形象跃然纸上，一切都是从书上得来的东西来解释生活;吉蒂和莉迪雅小姐是未成年，自有一种幼稚的疯狂女生特质。这五个女儿的形象如此，而其他人也是描写得极为成功的，虽然免不了有种单调的感觉，甚至于就整个故事情节来说，也比较直接，没有九曲回肠的曲折美，但这也或许就是奥斯汀本小说的特色吧。

There is no doubt that Pride and Prejudice is well-known, the book that is written by Jane Austen has an influence on the culture.As far as I’m concerned ,the ending of the fiction is wonderful, Elizabeth and Darcy won their happiness, leading a colourful life .

First of all, let’s learn about the author who is Jane Austen .She was unmarried all her life. She was born in a mid-class family and was brought up in a comfortable environment with harmonious surroundings, so there’s not too many conflicts in her sight neither in her novel. In Pride and Prejudice she talked different ideas about love and marriage through different characters.

Jane Austen disclosed mid-class young ladies’ different ideas of marriage and love through describing the different ways in which the Bennet girls doing with their marriage problems,and this undoubtedly shows the writer’s idea about love and marriage: it’s wrong to get married just for property, wealth and status while neither would it be without caring about those elements.Jane Austen just attached great significance to marriage through her novel

by telling people that marriage should be regarded carefully.

Then, let’s get close to story.The details is that Mr. Bennet is an English gentleman with an estate in Hertfordshire. He has five unmarried daughters but no sons while his inheritance must be inherited by a male, so Mrs. Bennet has been keen to seek husband for her daughters with great enthusiasm.

One day the Bennets had a new neighbor called Bingley who was a wealthy bachelor and followed be the target of Mrs. Bennet. At a ball Bingley fell in love with Jane Bennet who’s the oldest daughter of the Bennets. Bingley’s friend Darcy also came to the ball and struck the sights, many girls liked him while he thought all of them couldn’t suit his preference, including Elizabeth. Mr. Darcy always shows others a impression of pride, having found this Elizabeth began to hate Mr. Darcy.

Before long Darcy fell in love with Elizabeth Bennett because of her lovely behavior, while Elizabeth is disgusted by his pride and has a prejudice about him. The official Wickham was welcomed by the villagers, and Elizabeth also took a shine to him. Wickham told someting about darcy,which increased Eli’s prejudice about Mr. Darcy. At

another ball Mr. Darcy invited Elizabeth to dance with him, but Eli refused him. Eli’s elder male cousin Mr. Collin came to Hertfordshire to inherit the Bennetts property by rules, he wanted to marry with one of the Bennets. Having known that Jane was already engaged with Mr. Bingley, he asked Elizabeth to marry him but was seriously rejected. At last he proposed to Charllote who was Eli’s friend.

Mr. Collins was good at flattering and he got the pastorate with the help of Lady Catherine. Once his family was invited to Rosings Garden by Lady Catherine. Elizabeth also went there with Mr. Collin and Charllote. There she met Mr. Darcy who’s Lady Catherine’s nephew.Then Mr. Darcy came to the Collins’ and confessed his love for Elizabeth, of course he was rejected impolitely.

Afterwards Mr. Darcy wrote a letter to Eli in order to remove her misunderstandings of him. Elizabeth’s uncle and aunt were also impressed by Mr. Darcy’s politeness. Gradually Eli’s prejudice of Mr. Darcy disappeared. Eventually they became couple.

In my opinion ,on the one hand,I think Elizabeth has personality ethic which caused her independent idea about love and marriage and in consequence she earned a happy

life. There’re also Eli’s sisters’ love stories served as contrasts to the female subject’s ideal marriage, such as Charlotte and Collin’s life: they do had a luxury life, but there’s no real love between them and this kind of marriage is surely a tragedy of society.On the other hand,Darcy is brave ,he did do his best to pursuit his love.

As a matter of fact,everyone has shortcomings ,after reading the story ,I did realize that we should find our advantages and disadvantages by ourselves.Moreover,it’s necessary for us to try our best to get over shortcomings.I am aware that we ought to get along with others with the same attitude.The right that seeking for happiness is equal for everyone.therefore,we should value the things that we have,and cherish the chances.

更多热门文章：

《傲慢与偏见》这部小说虽然主要篇幅都是谈婚论嫁，但却不被视为爱情小说，而被视为世态小说。书中的时代背景造就了不同的爱情观，在这部书中，作者把恋爱和婚姻置于比一般言情小说更为宽广的社会环境中，里面人物的活动大多是开放性的，理性的，现实的，反应了她那个时代的世态人情，然而又不会让人感觉通俗浅显，她对人物鲜明形象和故事情节的生动刻画，能很好的引起读者的兴趣，“精心选择的语言和机智幽默”代表了《傲慢与偏见》艺术形式方面的本质。

这篇小说是以达西和伊丽莎白的爱情故事为主线的，他们最开始的互相讨厌,后来慢慢地互相爱慕。在当时人们以财富来衡量一个人,在那个年代的英国,爱情要受到社会,阶级,家庭,还有很多方面的因素的制约和考验，因为所生活的环境不一样，男主角达西是一个出生，财产，地位和教养都非常好的人久而久之的优越感，让他产生了一种傲慢的态度;而女主角伊丽莎白地位比较低，财产少，出于自己强烈的自尊心，就会对那些地位高，而且傲慢的人产生一种偏见;于是傲慢与偏见就这样阻隔在他们两人之间，成为他们的障碍，并为此蒙蔽了自己的眼睛，在经历了一系列波折后，他们的爱情成功的战胜了他们的傲慢与偏见，灰姑娘的美丽童话终于有了一个完美的结局。

在现实生活中，不管是爱情还是友情或者是同事同学之间的一些感情也很容易受一些主观的因素的影响，成为我们成长路上的阻碍，我们在与他人的交流和交往过程中，多多少少都会有一些大大小小的摩擦，这其中也会暴露我们的很多缺点和毛病，在这过程中，我们要善于发现自身的缺点和问题，学会从自身上找毛病，然后再认真的改掉，正如傲慢与偏见那样隐藏在自己身上的毛病，要学会去面对并改正，然后在和周围的人交流，你会发现前面的路会平坦很多，而你所需要的爱情或友情叶惠美进展的更加顺利。

少一些傲慢与偏见，多一些理解和宽容，也许下一个路口，你就会豁然开朗，然后发现事情并不像想象中的那样复杂。

The Gift of the Magi is a short story wrote by O.Henry.This story tells that in the day before Christmas,a poor young couple exchanged gifts by sold the most precious thing of each,but resulted ordetracted, the two precious gifts all became useless things.While they got the most precious thing than any material objects——love.

After read this story,I learned how to respect others love and how to love others.In this story,they all lost the most valuable things——Jims golden watch and Dellas beautiful hair. Behind this, I saw they loved each other infinitely.They loved their family, they let me feel that cold Christmas Eve has become the warm heaven just because of their gifts. If Della only took one dollar and eighty-seven cents to pick gift,this story will probably lacking of shocking, and also cannot cause readers thinking.

In this materialistic society, people often use money to measure gifts.When bags of gifts which are packaging delicately in front of us,what can we see except empty and blank? Parents feel happy because of our simple greeting cards in their birthday,because of a few words of blessing.These gifts,simple but true.It cant be compared with those which built with a lot of money, outlined by luxuriance. What clever gifts! In some sense, they are invaluable.

Yes,in this materialistic society,some people think money is everything,the one who owns money,who owns all.No wonder a great amount of girls became mammonists,and want to marry richers;no wonder more and more men think that there is no true love,what girls love is their money. But I always believe sincere love is existed and its priceless. Even if you have millions of money, you cant change it into true love. Maybe money can let you get some feelings from girls, but those are hypocritical. When you no longer possess vast wealth, the hypocritical feelings will ended and left you extremely painful finally.Jim and Della were a happy couple, although they were poor, living in short of money.In their hearts, money is not important, the important thing is the affection from each other.As long as they have it, they felt happier than any millionaire.

Maybe some people will pour scorn on it and cannot understand what their done. If there is a good fortune and a sincere feeling in front of you at the same time, which one will you choose? I wouldnt hesitate to choose the later, because sincere feeling is priceless! I believe that true pay will have sincere return finally, and the one who have true love can have his or her happiness.

Nowadays,more and more people have been pressed to lose their breath by the reality.They forgot the persons they love,and the persons who love them.We need to care about others,no matter how much money we have.What our loved one need is how our concern about him or her. In some important days,dont forget to bring him or her some gifts.No matter what is it,how valuable is it,he or she would like it anyway.

Because it is the gift of the Magi.

I think that if a person has an unselfish love, then it is a person who has all the noble qualities. In "" Love of education "" This touching book, everywhere that has a high-quality people.

"" Love of education "" This book is the hero - a fourth-grade boy An Like a vision, in diary forms, ranging from four-year in October the first day of school, has been written in July next year. Record An Like moving around various stories, the parents wrote in his diary of the dissuasive enlightening article, as well as nine teachers in the classroom, read the exciting story of the month. Each article is touching.

"" Love of education "" one chapter is written in a child chimney sweeping chimney sweeping earned 30 coins lost, and not return home, so the students are passing with their own money to help him, did not take students put their own money, presented flowers to him. I think this section was the most moving, because we usually encounter difficulties in their own always wanted to get help, and we usually have difficulties encountered in man-hours should also do our best to help him, not being the person you help will be someone else, love to pass it down this way. I believe that children chimney sweeping re-later someone else will.

After reading the article, I thought of the Sichuan earthquake in May this year, the Shenzhen peoples active contributions to the disaster, donations, let me once again feel the Shenzhen this "city of love" love.

one of the most interesting questions about gullivers travels is whether the houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of swifts satire. in other words, in book iv, is swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? if we look closely at the way that the houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

first we have to see that swift does not even take gullver seriously. for instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. also, when he first sees the yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. he says, "i must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. this is why swift refers to erasmus darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the beagle-to show how gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. but if lemule gulliver is satirized, so are the houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. they walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. as gulliver says, "it was with the utmost astonishment that i witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a vienese waltz. to my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the lord edmund burke" . as this quote demonstrates, gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. for instance, the leader of the houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of charles dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the kings and queens of england up to george ii. swift subtly shows that this houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of queen elizabeths husband.

swifts satire of the houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. one of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that guenivre has brought with him to the island. first she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. but when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "as i watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than mr. pope being fitted by a clothier. she dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. my horse sniffed the creature and turned away." it might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. but it makes more sense if we see that swift is being satiric here: it is the female houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century england. the houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress gullivers horse. gulliver imagines the horse saying, sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held mr. pope on her back makes me queezy .

a final indication that the houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the houynhms visits lilliput, where he visits the french royal society. he goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at gallilee). the scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "the creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

he has accomplished the scientists goal, but the scientist is not happy, for his livelihood has now been destroyed. swifts clear implication is that even though the houyhnhmns are smart, they do not know how to use that knowledge for the benefit of society, only for their own prideful agrandizement.

throughout gullivers travels, the houyhnhms are shown to be an ideal gone wrong. though their intent might have been good, they dont know how to do what they want to do because they are filled with pride. they mislead gulliver and they even mislead themselves. the satire on them is particularly well explained by the new born houyhnhm who, having just been born, exclaims, "with this sort of entrance, what must i expect from the rest of my life!" .

《傲慢与偏见》是简·奥斯汀的代表作。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的资料和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。

《傲慢与偏见》在书中是男女主角感情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。人的缺陷太多，首先是心灵上的陷阱。要想在一生中成就一番事业，无论是知识、教养、还是感情、事业，都需要同自己心灵的种种浅浮的陷阱或阴影做斗争，经过各种误解和长时刻的反复的认识过程，慢慢由心灵克服各自弱点和毛病，而走向开放、洒脱、自由的必然结果。扰扰尘世，做人不易;茫茫人海，佳偶难见。然而没有感情不好勉强别人结婚，只要人品正直，追求美德，不放松向喜之心，不苟且、贪图一时之利欲，追求两心之和谐、相应，运用彼此的智慧，克服心灵上的缺点，终得如愿以偿。

人和人之间的相处总会有一些小小的摩擦，而这些摩擦，往往就是自己内心中所潜藏的弱点或毛病，要和别人能够更愉快的生活，就务必先了解到自己的缺点，并磨去他，其次是了解别人的内心，最后再互相深入彼此，如此一来，你会发现到社会上每一件人、事、物都是如此完美、光明，更进一步激发出你内心深处的感动，发挥出自己的专长去替这个社会、这个国家、这个世界服务，毕竟我门是万物之长，如果人们不再用心去关怀身边的人，不再去付出自己的一臂之力，那么还有谁要去完成这个任务呢?因此从此刻开始，我们就就应将自己原先所存有的毛病给除去，换上一个全新的自我，为崭新的未来打拼吧!

【编者按】傲慢，偏见，这两个毋庸质疑的贬义词，让简。奥斯丁的作品成为精致的象征一时之间闻名遐迩，从而傲慢与偏见也成为了脍炙人口的伟大著作。

奥斯汀的〈傲慢与偏见〉，正如她自己所说，是在两寸象牙上细细的雕刻，它是奥斯汀的代表作。这部反映婚姻问题的小说是作者作品中最受欢迎的一部，也是她本人最喜欢的作品。作品生动的反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。其社会风情化似的小说不仅在当时吸引着广大的读者，时至今日，仍给读者以独特的艺术享受。她是第一个现实地描绘日常平凡生活的小说家，在英国小说史上起了承上启下的作用。

Austen pride and Prejudice, as she said, is in the details on 2cm ivory carving, it is the masterpiece of Austen. This reflects the Marriage Novels by the author is one of the most popular works, is also her most loved works. Works vivid reflects the late eighteenth Century to early nineteenth Century in a conservative and occlusion of the British town life and the ways of the world. The social customs of a novel at that time not only to attract a large number of readers, today, still give the reader a unique artistic enjoyment. She was the first to describe reality daily life of ordinary novelist, played an important role in the history of the British novel.

整部作品没有滂沱的气势，没有曲折跌宕的情节，但就是这种简单，至今深深地吸引着我们。奥斯汀短暂的一生几乎都是在英国的乡间度过的，也许就是周围朴素，宁静的氛围孕育了她淡然的气质。并不能因为没有丰富的经历，就对她的对于事物的分析能力有所怀疑，读过〈傲慢与偏见〉的人一定会为她细腻、敏锐的情感所折服。在写〈傲慢与偏见〉时，她只是一个十几岁的女孩，难道这不是一种天赋吗?她的确很少接触“外界”，但思想存在，想象存在，这一切的存在就足够。

The whole film without the torrential imposing no twists and turns, ups and downs, but this is simple, still attracted us deeply. Austen short life, almost all spent in the British countryside, perhaps the surrounding plain, quiet atmosphere gave birth to her indifferent temperament. Not as rich in experience, they have skills in analysis of her to doubt, read pride and Prejudice people will be fine for her, a keen sensibility at. Write pride and Prejudice, she was a teenage girl, isnt this a gift? She has very little contact with "outsiders", but there is thought, imagination, the existence of all this is enough.

范文二

Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters.

The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.

The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.

Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.

范文三

Pride and Prejudice is a novel written by the famous English writer, Jane Austen, who was the sixth children in a family of seven and was born in the village of steventon in Hampshire in 1775 and died of Addison’s disease in 1817. The book first published on 28 January 1813 by the bookseller Thomas Egerton who had also published Sense and Sensibility, the original version of the novel was written in 1796-1797 under the title First Impressions .

Pride and Prejudice is a love story, mainly tells the love between Elizabeth and Darcy. It divided into 2 volumes and is composed of 42 chapters altogether. The major characters are Mr. Darcy, A rich and proud young man. Elizabeth, the second eldest daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet. Mr. Bingley , A rich young bachelor. Jane, the first daughter of Mr. and Mrs.Bennet. The story begin with Bingley’s arrival. One day when Mrs.Bennet hear Bingley has taken Netherfield, a house near her’s. She is so happy and arranged one of her five daughters marriage with him. At a ball, luckly, Bingley and Jane fall in love at the first sight. Darcy, a friend of Bingley’s , was attracted to Elizabeth, a lively and spirited girl. But Darcy greatly offends her by his supercilious behavior and this dislike is increased by Wickham, a dashing young militia officer of the unjust treatment he has met with at Darcys hands. One day when Darcy and Bingley’s two sisters disgusted with the vulgarity of Mrs. Bennet and her two youngest daughters, effectively separated Bingley and Jane. Meanwhile, Collins, a cousin of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, married charlotte, a friend of Elizabeth’s, for Elizabeth’s refuse to marry him. But One day Darcy send Elizabeth a letter, in which he justifies the separation of his friend Bingley and Jane and make it clear that Wickham is. So Elizabeth changed her opinions and ideas toward him. Once when Elizabeth visited her uncle and aunt in the north of England, she met Darcy there and witnessed his changes through series of behaviors, no longer pride and become gentle and attentive, all these made their marriage arranged, and they also suitably provided for Bingley and Jane’s reunited and engaged. The story ends with both their happy marriages.

My point of view towards the masterpiece of Jane Austen’s is that this novel reflects the English human sentiment of the end of 18th century and the early of 19th century under the circumstance of conservative，and tells us the difference ways and attitudes to marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet’s five daughters’. Thereby reveal the author herself attitude towards marriage, that is love and marriage based on money, property and social status is not perfect, but it is also stupid Without considering all of these. There, the author emphasize the importance of ideal marriage, meanwhile, to be opposed to love & marriage based on money or property and to be opposed to people’s laugh love & marriage off. The author takes the affection/love as the cornerstone of ideal marriage between male and female. Elizabeth as the leading character in this novel, was born in the family of squireen’s, and is loved by Darcy. Darcy propose marriage to her in spite of difference in the possession of property and social status, but is refused by Elizabeth for his pride , the novel demonstrate that if the pride of Darcy’s existed ， there will be no love and also happy marriage between Elizabeth and he, it is really nice that Elizabeth witness the changes of Darcy’s through series of behavior in the following days. viewing that he is no longer pride and then eliminating her prejudice to him, finally engaged with him and leading a happy marriage. The author described that female is in pursuit of independent personality and equal right through several different attitudes of Elizabeth for Darcy’s propose marriage. Meanwhile, demonstrate Elizabeth’s independent understanding for a happy marriage. In this article, the writer described several unperfect marriages of Elizabeth’s sisters and close friends, aimed at making a sharp contrast with Elizabeth’s beatific marriage and revealed that marriage without love but base on social status and property actually is a kind of public tragedies. Humorous, ironical, polished language and real storyline is also occurred in this article.

更多读后感范文：