傲慢与偏见读后感英文(精品20篇)

这部出自英国作家奥斯丁之手的浪漫爱情小说，其中一直夹带着浪漫最大的“敌人”——现实!没有浪漫的爱情就失去了其本身的美好的色彩，但小说中种种门当户对等一系列现实问题却充斥其间。

小说共写了四桩婚姻故事，可以说这四桩婚事代表了世界上各种类型的婚姻。文中着重描写的是最单纯、最纯粹的爱情——不是为了财富，不是为了地位，仅仅是和自己所爱的人在一起——达西与伊丽莎白的爱情。

其中最荒谬、最令人不齿的是贝内特家族的小女儿与威科姆的婚事。威科姆是一个表里不一的伪君子，险些欺骗伊丽莎白，后伊丽莎白在其舅舅舅妈的规劝以及自己理智冷静的控制自己的感情之下，没有上他的当。是谎言终究会被揭穿：达西戳穿了他的谎言。可是谁知小女儿放荡无知，竟和他私奔了!最后还是在达西的资助下才有钱成婚，婚后还自诩幸福。这种由无知导致两人不顾一切结婚，自以为幸福，却不知遭了多少人的唾弃、鄙视。

第二桩婚事明显简单了许多：结婚的目的就是为了金钱和财富，没有任何感情基础。夏绿蒂和科斯林可所谓门当户对，金钱成为他们俩唯一的挂钩。虽然婚后并不算幸福，但不得不承认，钱改善了生活，过的并不差。现在像这样为钱而婚的、没有感情的婚姻早已屡见不鲜。

宾利与简的爱情故事算是大众的表现了，两情相悦，众望所归。虽免不了过程有些曲折，但终究在亲友祝福、父母见证下完婚。婚后幸福而美满，和睦且融洽。

达西与伊丽莎白的爱情可算的上是难能可贵了。达西对伊丽莎白的一见不钟情，二见却倾心的感情一直持续了下去，伊丽莎白对他则算是日久生情。两个人闹过矛盾，吵过架，翻过脸，伊丽莎白还曾一度讨厌他，但最后在达西的耐心解释下，一封真情流露的长信，揭穿了威科姆的真实面目，为自己洗脱那些污蔑他的谣言，使伊丽莎白对他刮目相看。后来达西对伊丽莎白一家人给予帮助，一点也没有他那傲慢的特性和那种上流社会的偏见，终于感动了伊丽莎白——她曾今还拒绝过达西的求婚，达西竟然还能伸出援手，不变感情——文中许多描写两人心理的句子很值得回味。两人最终结成百年好合，也算是来之不易的幸福。

全文四桩婚事犀利批判当时社会多数人的婚姻价值观在于金钱财富，而文章中达西与伊丽莎白的爱情故事则犹如镜中花、水中月，似乎遥不可及。所以在追求爱情的路上，一定要坚持自己的信念，不要因为金钱、名利等现实因素而草草决定，要坚持寻找自己的真爱，要学会珍惜相爱的彼此，不要由于别人的一些话而改变自己，相信自己，幸福要自己去经营!

Book Review: “Camille”

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800s, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armands father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armands reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumass last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?

Jane. Love living in a parents, sponsor, grew up under the environment of treatment with peers, aunt abandon, cousin contempt, cousin insults and beating of a child… this is the dignity of the ruthletrample, but perhaps because it all, Jane. Love and faith of infinite indomitable spirit, a kind of inner personality can win.

In rochester, she never because he is a teacher and the family status meanness, but that they feel inferior is equal. Should not because she is a servant, but not respected by others. Also because of her integrity, noble and pure heart, no pollution, secular society for the shock, and rochester her as a spiritual and equality in the conversation, and slowly and deeply in love with her.

Jane eyre itself to us is a kind of simplified, is a fanpiaoguizhen, is a kind of pursuit of whole heart feeling, is a kind of simplified feelings and neglected, it is like a cup of water, purify every readers heart, also cause readers, especially female readers

Joy depicts the crisis of faith that overes Rabbi Banish of Komarov， who， having buried his four sons and two daughters. Only through the mercy of the God he has denied， manifest in a radiant vision of the dead Rebecca， his beloved youngest daughter， is the rabbi’s belief restored. The sense of wonder and the touch of heavenly joy that linger after the vision dissolves convince Rabbi Banish of the folly of judging God’s actions by human standards. The rabbi has interpreted the apparent tragedy of his children’s premature deaths as evidence of God’s alienation， forgetting that God is by definition inscrutable. That God’s purpose transcends man’s ability to prehend it is made clear to the expiring rabbi when the family dead approach his deathbed with arms outstretched to enfold him among them. For theirs is the kingdom of heaven to which a loving God has called them; and their deaths have evidenced not God’s wrath but his grace.

A version of Rabbi Banish’s deathbed revelation appears to Rabbi Nechemia in Something Is There. At twenty-seven he is already racked by the doubts that torment Rabbi Banish. So shaken is his belief in God that he deserts his rabbinical post in provincial Bechev for the flesh-posts of Warsaw. Although the prostitutes， unclean food， and shady business dealings which he witnesses there hold no attraction for the erstwhile rabbi， they intensify his revulsion from the world created by God and therefore his alienation from God himself. Unlike Rabbi Bainish， whose intimations of immortality and consequent rededication to God precede his radiant deathbed vision， Rabbi Nechemia cannot allay his doubts until the very moment of death， when a light he never knew was there flickered in hid brain.

While his dying words—something is there—resolve his crisis of faith， they e too late to affect the spiritual renewal attained by Rabbi Banish. No explicit promise of immortality， let along of salvation， attends Rabbi Nechemia’s vision. Perhaps grace is accorded Rabbi Banish because his doubt is triggered by devastating personal losses， and withheld from Rabbi Nechemia because his despair is the bitter fruit of idle speculation about the unknown. Whatever the reason， relatively few of Singer’s characters are granted at the moment of death the transcendent vision of unity between man and God that appears to Rabbi Banish in Joy. For the fortunate few， release from time into eternity is affected by a divine visitation which obliterates distinctions between past and present， living and dead.

These kinds of characters are lost in their world because of the seducement of the material world. They doubt their formal faith and gradually give up what they believed. But after they have experienced so much hardship， they realize that they cannot adapt to the life of the outer world so they regress to the former life with formal faith. They realize the importance of God and they begin to think seriously about the relationship between man and God. At last they find their right way of their life.

A simple story, an ordinary man, an ordinary big marlin, in the vast sea happened seemingly ordinary and extraordinary experience.

This book is about a Cuban old fisherman named diego, a man fishing alone, in the 84 days after nothing caught a big marlin. This is the old man never seen nor heard of than his boat two feet longer a big fish. Big fish strength is big, dragging the boat drifted for two days and two nights, the old man has experienced in the past two days and two nights have never suffered tough test, finally put the big shark fin die, tied to the bow. At this time, however, encountered a shark, the old man and the shark dogfight, result the big marlin was shark ate up, old man finally dragged home only a pair of bare fish skeleton.

After reading this novel, I found that the old mans story is not only a symbol of the relationship between human and nature, and a symbol of the whole human spirit indestructible. In reality, though he failed, but in spirit, he is the winner. Here, the old man is not only represents a person, but to represent a force, a kind of spirit, that is to let a person admire perseverance, the spirit of never yielding. I also very admire the novel old fishermans will, he let me know how a man must be strong, cant meet the frustration is losing, that will never be a one thing.

一个简单的故事，一个平凡的老人，一条普通的大马林鱼，在茫茫大海上发生了看似平凡而又不平凡的经历。

这本书讲了古巴的一个名叫桑地亚哥的老渔夫，独自一个人出海打鱼，在一无所获的84天之后钓到了一条无比巨大的马林鱼。这是老人从来没见过也没听说过的比他的船还长两英尺的一条大鱼。鱼大劲也大，拖着小船漂流了整整两天两夜，老人在这两天两夜中经历了从未经受的艰难考验，终于把大鱼刺死，拴在船头。然而这时却遇上了鲨鱼，老人与鲨鱼进行了殊死搏斗，结果大马林鱼被鲨鱼吃光了，老人最后拖回家的只剩下一副光秃秃的鱼骨架。

读完这篇小说，我发现，老人的故事不仅象征着人与自然的关系，而且象征着整个人类坚不可摧的精神。在现实中，他虽然失败了，但在精神上，他却是胜利者。在这里，老人不仅仅是代表着一个人，而是代表了一股力量，一种精神，那是让人敬佩的坚韧不拔，永不服输的精神。我也十分佩服小说中老渔夫的意志,他让我懂得了一个人一定要坚强，不能遇到一点挫折就败退，这样永远也做不成一件事。

“Pride and prejudice” is the famous British writer Jane Austen masterpiece, the works in daily life for material, the romantic and reality love story.

Works of vivid reflects the late eighteenth to well into the nineteenth century in the conservative and block state of the British town life and ways of the world. Its social graffiti novel at that time if not only attracts the general reader, real to this day, still give the reader a unique art enjoyment.

First of all, from story to see, Elizabeth resourcefulness, have courage, these have vision, have very strong self-respect, and be good at thinking. Just then a an unmarried ladies the lady of speaking, this is valuable. And also it is this quality, just make her in love have independent initiative，and led to her and happy family of darcy. In my opinion, Elizabeth is worthy of praise.

In the way of the pursuit of love, be sure to a firm belief, not for money, fame, wealth, or any other cause carelessly decided to, want to hold to find true love. If the other party to some of the defect is himself cant stand, but also what cant change it, you should give up the resolute choice; Of course should also to cherish each other, not because of some of the others words, they change their decision, happiness to yourself to the business. This is the book want to communicate to the world is very precious words, is also to the heart of the pursuit of love chicken soup.

Reading this book, I be a lifetime earnings, enjoy the spiritual baptism.

更多热门文章：

《德伯家的苔丝》是哈代的代表作，是“威塞克斯系列”中的一部。它描写了一位农村姑娘的悲惨命运。看过这部小说后你有什么感触呢?下面是小编为大家整理的英文读后感范文，希望对你有帮助。

She was seduced by a so-called gentleman—Alec, and from then on her life totally changed from this loss of innocence. People looked down on her and respected her no more. Actually she did nothing wrong because before she was seduced she knew nothing of men. She was just a girl when she first met that terrible man.

She was forced by the gossips and the church to blame herself for this accident, so she thought she deserved nothing good. In order to get rid of the past she decided to go to a distant dairy farm but was still saying to herself that she was wrong. Maybe God didn’t agree with that, because the Lord gave her someone she loved with her whole heart and life—Angel Chare. Angel popped the question to her but she refused him without saying why. She said she loved him deeply and perhaps no one in the world could love him more than she did but she could not marry him for some unspoken reason. Angel wasn’t satisfied with this vague answer and did his best to win Tess. Somehow she agreed and they soon fixed the wedding day. Soon after their wedding Angel confessed the crime he committed to a woman long time ago and asked for Tess’s forgiveness. Tess was not at all angry and forgave Angel at once; in fact she was rather happy and excited for she also had things to confess.

She sat and told everything to Angel, hoping he would forgive her as he was forgiven but she was wrong. She was not forgiven, not as she thought she was. The woman pays.

Without Angel’s love, nothing meant anything to her. The result wasn’t important now. Tess was arrested for her murder of that so-called gentleman. Why? She still loved Angel and when he finally went back to her and asked for HER forgiveness, after he regretted what he had done unfair to Tess, she was desperate. That was too late—Alec had always told Tess that Angel would never come back so he won Tess’s trust. Unluckily Angel did come back and found Tess.! Everything was too late!

Tess was deceived and she lost Angel for the second time! The strengh of her love was so strong that she had forgotten the difference between right and wrong. Before that she had done nothing wrong but when she killed Alec, everything really changed! She became a criminal! How could it be? She was as pure and innocent as the good wife in the Bible. Her whole character was honest and faithful. Angel figured out at last that a person should be judged not only on what he has done but also on what he wanted to do!

Tess didn’t want to be seduced by man and she had no power to defend herself so she lost her innocence and that’s all! Angel also did the wrong thing and it was even more serious than Tess’s crime but HE was not blamed for it. Why it is always the woman who pays? Why they are always hurt? Why was Tess’s girlish purity lost? Why does the wrong man take the wrong woman? Why do the bad often ruin the good? Why is beauty damaged by ugliness? Women are too weak! Thousands of years of history have shown us that women have always been treated unfairly!

In old China there was a culture, which didn’t think of women as human beings. If you asked one if he was the oldest in his family, he would probably answer “the oldest one” even if he had some elder sisters. If you asked why then he would say, “Ha, they are not included!”

People gave birth to many girls in order to have only one boy to keep the family name going. They thought girls had no use for the family. They would be married and go to live with their husbands’ home and be their wives some day sooner or later. So they were extremely hard on girls.

Girls should be hard working, faithful, loyal, intelligent, and virtuous and the most important thing was she must be a maiden! If her husband was the first man who touched her then she was a good girl, a good wife no matter how she thought. If she wasn’t, then she would gain a very bad reputation and nobody would dare to go near her. What about men? People did not care whether he was an experienced man or not, nor did they care about his character. They thought man equals power and power equals rights…

Now let’s not be so bitter. Nowadays women’s situations have become much better. Some are because of the change of society and some are because of civilization. Just let those poor painful women like TESS be just a memory.

Crazily, but truthfully, I finished reading the most part of the novel "A Tale of Two Cities" in just one day. Lost in the story, I felt like being together with the characters and experiencing the same exciting events. Soon it came to an end. To tell you my feelings, its infinite sadness and a strong emotion that can drive me to cry.

The story is set in London and Paris at the time of the great French Revolution. It shows the causes of revolution and its effects on peoples day-to-day lives. Before the revolution, the King and the aristocracy treated their people cruelly in France. The common people were extremely poor and miserable. The crops in the fields were poor as if even the land shared the misery of the people. And there were so heavy taxes that all the villagers had nothing to hand over at last. On the other hand, the aristocracy made their will as the law by using money and gold. There were no justice, no equality and no fairness. Just as what happened to Dr Manette,he wrote to the Minister to show the crime what Marquis Evremonde had done, resulting in himself being arrested and sent to the prison Bastille without any reason.

Then this situation of darkness was needed to be changed. As people such as the Defarges prepared and arranged, at length the Revolution came to break out. When the Bastille was captured and the King was tried and put to death as well as many other aristocrats, things didnt go on as what they had been expected. The situation stayed the same, or even worse. The prisoners from the Bastille were set free while more prisons were filled with people who had done no wrong again. People who once lived on the bottom of class took the charge now and their heart had been full of evil. The only thing they wanted to do was to revenge. And these so-called "patriots" would like to see more and more innocent prisoners going to the guillotine and thats their joy. As the novel wrote,” In everything they did were merciless, for they had been hardened in the fires of suffering and the touch of pity could make no mark on them".

Equality and fairness is what people seek,which led to the French Revolution.As a consequence,neither equality nor fairness was got after the revolution.And thats the tragedy of the history.I was heavyhearted when reading what Sydney Carton said before death and I burst into tears finally.

人们普遍认为《简·爱》是夏洛蒂·勃朗特“诗意的生平写照”，是一部具有自传色彩的作品。下面是语文迷网整理的简爱英文读后感范文，供大家参考选择。

篇1：《简爱》英文读后感

Jane Eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. After we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, Jane Eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:

We remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.

We remember her pursuit of justice. It’s like a companion with the goodness. But still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.

We remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. In her opinion, everyone is the same at the God’s feet. Though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.

We also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…

When we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.

Actually, she wasn’t pretty, and of course, the ordinary appearance didn’t make others feel good of her, even her own aunt felt disgusted with it. And some others even thought that she was easy to look down on and to tease, so when Miss Ingram met Jane Eyre, she seemed quite contemptuous, for that she was obviously much more prettier than ‘the plain and ugly governess’. But as the little governess had said: ‘Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soulless and heartless? You think wrong!’ This is the idea of equality in Jane Eyre’s mind. God hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but instead, God gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. Her idea of equality and self-respect impress us so much and let us feel the power inside her body.

In my mind, though a person’s beauty on the face can make others once feel that one is attractive and charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same beautiful as the appearance, such as beauty cannot last for, when others find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a falsity, it’s not true, they will like the person no more. For a long time, only a person’s great virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as AN EVERLASTING BEAUTY, just as Kahill Gibran has said, that ‘Beauty is a heart enflamed and a soul enchanted’. I can feel that how beauty really is, as we are all fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but as there are great differences in our souls, and from that, we can know that whether a man is noble or ordinary, and even obscure, that is, whether he is beautiful or not.

Her story makes us thinking about life and we learn much from her experience, at least, that is a fresh new recognition of the real beauty.

篇2：《简爱》英文读后感

I first read "Jane Eyre" in eighth grade and have read it every few years since. It is one of my favorite novels, and so much more than a gothic romance to me, although thats how I probably would have defined it at age 13. I have always been struck, haunted in a way, by the characters - Jane and Mr. Rochester. They take on new depth every time I meet them...and theirs is a love story for the ages.

Charlotte Brontes first published novel,www.99zuowen.com, and her most noted work, is a semi-autobiographical coming-of-age story. Jane is plain, poor, alone and unprotected, but due to her fierce independence and strong will she grows and is able to defy societys expectations of her. This is definitely feminist literature, published in 1847, way before the beginning of any feminist movement. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why the novel has had such a wide following since it first came on the market. It is also one of the first gothic romances published and defines the genre.

Jane Eyre, who is our narrator, was born into a poor family. Her parents died when she was a small child and the little girl was sent to live with her Uncle and Aunt Reed at Gateshead. Janes Uncle truly cared for her and showed his affection openly, but Mrs. Reed seemed to hate the orphan, and neglected her while she pampered and spoiled her own children. This unfair treatment emphasized Janes status as an unwanted outsider. She was often punished harshly. On one occasion her nasty cousin Jack picked a fight with her. Jane tried to defend herself and was locked in the terrifying "Red Room" as a result. Janes Uncle Reed had died in this room a little while before, and Mrs. Reed knew how frightened she was of the chamber. Since Jane is the narrator, the reader is given a first-hand impression of the childs feelings, her heightened emotional state at being imprisoned. Indeed, she seems almost like an hysterical child, filled with terror and rage. She repeatedly calls her condition in life "unjust" and is filled with bitterness. Looking into the mirror Jane sees a distorted image of herself. She views her reflection and sees a "strange little figure," or "tiny phantom." Jane has not learned yet to subordinate her passions to her reason. Her passions still erupt unchecked. Her isolation in the Red Room is a presentiment of her later isolation from almost every society and community. This powerful, beautifully written scene never fails to move me.

Mrs. Reed decided to send Jane away to the Lowood School, a poor institution run by Mr. Brocklehurst, who believed that suffering made grand people. All the children there were neglected, except to receive harsh punishment when any mistake was made. At Lowood, Jane met Helen Burns, a young woman a little older than Jane, who guided her with vision, light and love for the rest of her life. Janes need for love was so great. It really becomes obvious in this first friendship. Helen later died from fever, in Janes arms. Her illness and death could have been avoided if more attention had been paid to the youths. Jane stayed at Lowood for ten years, eight as a student and two as a teacher. Tired and depressed by her surroundings, Jane applied for the position of governess and found employment at Thornfield. The mansion is owned by a gentleman named Edward Fairfax Rochester. Her job there was to teach his ward, an adorable little French girl, Adele. Over a long period the moody, inscrutable Rochester confides in Jane and she in him. The two form an unlikely friendship and eventually fall in love. Again, Janes need for love comes to the fore, as does her passionate nature. She blooms. A dark, gothic figure, Rochester also has a heart filled with the hope of true love and future happiness with Jane. Ironically, he has brought all his misery, past and future, on himself.

All is not as it seems at Thornfield. There is a strange, ominous woman servant, Grace Poole, who lives and works in an attic room. She keeps to herself and is rarely seen. From the first, however, Jane has sensed bizarre happenings at night, when everyone is asleep .There are wild cries along with violent attempts on Rochesters life by a seemingly unknown person. Jane wonders why no one investigates Mrs. Poole. Then a strange man visits Thornfield and mysteriously disappears with Mr. Rochester. Late that night Jane is asked to sit with the man while the lord of the house seeks a doctors help. The man has been seriously wounded and is weak from loss of blood. He leaves by coach, in a sorry state, first thing in the morning. Janes questions are not answered directly. This visit will have dire consequences on all involved. An explosive secret revealed will destroy all the joyful plans that Jane and Rochester have made. Jane, once more will face poverty and isolation.

Charlotte Brontes heroine Jane Eyre, may not have been graced with beauty or money, but she had a spirit of fire and was filled with integrity and a sense of independence - character traits that never waned in spite of all the oppression she encountered in life. Ms. Bronte brings to the fore in "Jane Eyre" such issues as: the relations between men and women in the mid-19 century, womens equality, the treatment of children and of women, religious faith and hypocrisy (and the difference between the two), the realization of selfhood, and the nature of love and passion. This is a powerhouse of a novel filled with romance, mystery and passions. It is at once startlingly fresh and a portrait of the times. Ms. Bronte will make your heart beat faster, your pulse race and your eyes fill with tears.

I read a very interesting book, the name of the book is called "Tom Sawyer, I like the book in the little hero and some story happened on him.

Tom is a naughty, naive and lively children, but in the eyes of an adult who is also a real bad boy, he naughty, like mischief, play truant, the nature is the norm, not only in this way, he make trouble method also each time, let a person elusive, small-scale operations. Although he is a very bad very bad child, but also to make people laugh: penalty was painting the walls, and could come up with a good way to make a friend for him to complete, and make friends with him to take a variety of foods and toys for a chance to paint the walls. In this way, Tom not only comfortable, leisure and suddenly gained a lot of gifts.

Let me more impressive is the story of Tom and huck and Joe three people formed a team when the pirates fled to a desert island. In this adventure, he met with difficulties, but he didnt lose heart, dont give up, again and again to challenge difficulties bravely, until down with difficulty.

After reading this book, I feel that we meet with difficulties dont get discouraged, and strive to insist on. Tom lives full of sunshine also tells us: as long as there is joy, have a dream, a dream can come true!

我读了一本非常有趣的书，书的名字叫《汤姆索亚历险记》，我很喜欢这本书中的小主人公以及在他身上发生的一些故事。

汤姆是一个顽皮、天真并且十分活泼的孩子，但在大人的眼里他同时也是一个不折不扣的坏孩子，他调皮、喜欢恶作剧、逃学这些自然是家常便饭，不仅这样，他捣蛋的方法还一次比一次厉害，让人琢磨不透，防不胜防。他虽然是一个很坏很坏的孩子，但也会做出让人捧腹大笑的事情：被罚粉刷墙壁，竟能想出好办法让小伙伴替他完成，并让小伙伴们拿各种各样的食物和玩具来跟他换一次刷墙的机会。这样一来，汤姆不光悠闲自在，而且一下子就收获了很多礼物。

让我印象比较深刻的是故事中汤姆与哈克再加上乔三人组成了一个团队逃到了荒岛上当海盗。在这次冒险中，他遇到了种种困难，但他并不灰心，也不放弃，一次又一次勇敢地向困难挑战，直到打倒困难为止。

读了这本书以后，我觉得遇到困难我们不要轻易气馁，而要努力奋斗，坚持下去。汤姆充满阳光的生活里也告诉我们：只要有欢乐，有梦想，美梦便可以成真!

"In order to property, money and position and the marriage is wrong; the marriage does not consider the above factors also stupid." This sentence can come to this book.

One distinctive characters in "her" lifelike; Clever sensible Elizabeth, sincerity, persistence, darcy, gentle tolerant Jane, frivolous superficial Lydia, no mind, Mrs Bennett relatively ineffective Mr Bennett, selfish snobbish miss bingley, mighty lady Catherine, boring Collins, and so on. Among them, admirable, sympathetic, or a smile. In addition, the dialogue between the characters in the novel is also a feature of the novel. Elizabeth witty words, Mr Bennett its sarcasm to him, for the khans rhetoric, Collins rap wording, which make readers view. Do you know of who "she" is? "She" is the author -- Jane Austen.

The book was welcomed by generations of readers, and love. "Pride and prejudice", published in 1813, a love story is novel, the novel of the communist party of China involves four marriage, but each have each characteristic.

In a word, no matter from content and Austins novel narrative techniques, "pride and prejudice" is a classic.

“为了财产、金钱和地位而结婚是错误的;而结婚不考虑上述因素也是愚蠢的。”这句话正好可以来讲明这本书。

一个个鲜明的人物形象在“她”的笔下栩栩如生;聪明理智的伊丽莎白，真诚执著的达西，温柔宽容的简，轻浮浅薄的丽迪亚，没有头脑的贝内特太太，相对无能的贝内特先生，自私势利的宾利小姐，不可一世的凯瑟琳夫人，无聊透顶的柯林斯等等。他们中，有的令人佩服，有的令人同情，有的令人忍俊不禁。此外，小说中的人物对话也是小说的一大特色。伊丽莎白的机智话语，贝内特先生对他它的讽刺挖苦，为可汗的花言巧语，柯林斯的饶舌措辞，无不让读者大饱眼福。你知道当中的“她”是谁吗?“她”就是作者——简.奥斯汀。

这本书受到一代又一代读者的欢迎、喜爱。《傲慢与偏见》发表于1813年，爱情故事也是小说主线，小说中共涉及了四桩婚烟，但各有各的特点。

总之，无论从小说的故事内容和奥斯汀的叙述技巧来说，《傲慢与偏见》都不失为一部经典作品。

读了奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》让我知道了原来在遥远的欧洲不仅有罗密欧与朱丽叶那样悲壮的爱情，像莎翁那样的古典哥特式的美，原来也有市井家，回归生活的美。简单，精致，如同“两寸牙雕”，却窥视出了整个社会。

弗兰克奥康纳说：“我认为简。奥斯汀是英国文学史上最伟大的技巧局将一样，她在文学方面炉火纯青，就像莫扎特在音乐方面的完美无缺一样。”《傲慢与偏见》的语言如同掠过竹林的风，带给我竹林般的清凉，泉水般的清澈，让人可以随时随地的沉浸其中。那细腻的语言，缜密的思维，为我拉开了英国田园风光的帷幕，不经意间勾勒出了一个浪漫纯美的童话，却又那么的贴近生活。

这是一部描写爱情与婚姻的小说。小说围绕班奈特太太如何把五个女儿嫁出去的主题展开。书中一共写了四队青年男女的结合，作者一一加以比较，批判，爱憎分明的阐述了自己的爱情与婚姻观。富有傲慢的达西和睿智具有反叛精神的伊丽莎白，温柔体贴的简和有权有势的宾利，以及莉迪亚和威克姆，夏洛蒂与柯林斯。

贝内特夫妇五个女儿待字闺中，没有子嗣，依照当时的法律，他们死后家产须由远房内侄柯林斯继承，因此把五个女儿嫁到有钱人家，成了贝内特太太最大的心愿。于是在这样的背景下展开了整个故事的架构。虽然作者在作品中没有重大的社会矛盾，但她以女性特有的细致入微的观察力，真实的描绘了她周围世界的小天地，尤其是绅士淑女间的婚姻和爱情

风波。其实小说中的班奈特太太是当时社会大多数人的缩影，爱情对她们来说是不可靠的奢侈品，她们只看重物质，看重权势。所以当富有单身的宾利来到内瑟菲尔德庄园，便成了众人注目的焦点和谈论的话题，以及小说中对军官们到来，小镇人民细微的表情和言语的描写，将当时社会风气展现的淋漓尽致。

然而作者奥斯汀是一个具有批判精神的女性，于是她塑造了一个追求纯粹的爱情，多少有些藐视权贵的伊丽莎白。虽然小说写于19世纪初叶，但是她所阐述的爱情观与婚姻观放在当下中国却也依旧是那么热点的问题。看到社会中充斥着的拜金主义，炫富事件，小三，包养等心中竟升起一种荒凉，但这也并非真爱的缺失，而是社会问题。我个人认为这种狂热的拜金主义是因为社会制度的不够完善，本来在一个市场经济国家，对金的崇拜，对物质的追求是很正常的事，然而在中国却显得有些病态了，因为在中国没钱你便无法在这个社会生存下去，在“生存”这把悬于头顶的大刀压迫下，拜金现象自然变得严重，人间的真善美也在死亡的威胁下大大贬值。而在国外，特别是欧洲，因为社会保障制度的完善，哪怕你没钱，你还可以生存，所以在国外对艺术，对学术的追求热情远高于中国，同样在那样一个安逸的社会里，爱情观也让现代中国青年向往。

在我看来婚姻的奠基本来就应该是爱情，如同伊丽莎白所追求的一样。面包与玫瑰的选择，若二者不可得兼，取玫瑰而舍面包也。这种选择或许是因为我还没有面临生活的压力，但是追求爱，追求美的确是发自内心的呼吁。

但这只是个人的做出的选择罢了，在经济学中的一个重要基本假设

那便是人的欲望是无限的，而资源是有限的，所以人们总是在不停的面临选择，而我只是出于个人偏好更侧重精神，愿意承受更大的机会成本而已。同样，有些人更侧重于物质，这只是一个选择，没有对错可言。然人毕竟是社会性动物，当大部分人做出了同样的选择，那这个选择便成了一种风气，久而久之，便成了一种习俗。之所以将题目设为“两寸牙雕”，不仅是因为《傲慢与偏见》的精巧细致，更是因为通过这个“牙雕”窥见了当时的风气，抛开爱情不谈，还有其他的一些感慨。

首先让我感慨的是当时人们对法律的敬畏和遵守因为整个故事的构架便是在依据当时法律贝内特夫妇死后财产由远房内侄继承这个源动力的作用下进行的，可见当时法治发展的水平。

其次是平等，“傲慢与偏见”这个书名便是在平等的观念下产生的，达西因为在交际舞会上不肯与他

人跳舞，让伊丽莎白认为他十分傲慢，以至于产生了偏见。要认识和结交朋友都必须与他人一同跳舞，随时更改舞伴，尽兴而为，虽然这个平等具有局限性，但这些应该便是现在欧洲国家自由，平等，法治等观念的雏形。这些从两寸牙雕中观察出的细末，让我回眼中国的当下，期待能发现更多的进步雏形。

This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following

Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?

The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane

met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In

dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

One of the most interesting questions about Gullivers Travels is whether the Houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of Swifts satire. In other words, in Book IV, is Swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? If we look closely at the way that the Houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact Swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

First we have to see that Swift does not even take Gullver seriously. For instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. Also, when he first sees the Yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. He says, "I must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. This is why Swift refers to Erasmus Darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the Beagle-to show how Gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. But if Lemule Gulliver is satirized, so are the Houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. They walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. As Gulliver says, "It was with the utmost astonishment that I witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a Vienese waltz. To my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the Lord Edmund Burke" . As this quote demonstrates, Gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the Houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. For instance, the leader of the Houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of Charles Dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the Kings and Queens of England up to George II. Swift subtly shows that this Houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of Queen Elizabeths husband.

Swifts satire of the Houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. One of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that Guenivre has brought with him to the island. First she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. But when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "As I watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than Mr. Pope being fitted by a clothier. She dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. My horse sniffed the creature and turned away." It might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. But it makes more sense if we see that Swift is being satiric here: it is the female Houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century England. The Houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress Gullivers horse. Gulliver imagines the horse saying, Sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held Mr. Pope on her back makes me queezy .

A final indication that the Houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the Houynhms visits Lilliput, where he visits the French Royal Society. He goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at Gallilee). The scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the Houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "The creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. Slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

It is wrong to get married for the property, money and position; Get married and does not consider that above-mentioned factors are unwise too . So, she objects to getting married for money , objecting to regarding the marriage as a trifling matter . She emphasizes the importance of the ideal marriage , and regard men and women;s emotion as the foundation stone which concludes the ideal marriage .

The woman protagonist in the book Elizabeth comes from the little landlord;s family, reaches the west to have deep love for for the rich and powerful people sons and younger brothers. Reach the disparity of ignoring family status and wealth of the west, propose to her, but is refused. Elizabeth;s misunderstanding and prejudice to him are a reason, but a main one is the arrogance that she dislikes him.

Reach the thes of the west in fact status; the reflections of difference, exist this kind arrogant, Not having common thoughts and feelings between he and Elizabeth, the marriage that can not have lofty ideals . Elizabeth watches conducting oneself in society and a series of behavior of reaching the west personally afterwards, See he change the proud conceited expressions of passing by, dispel misunderstanding and prejudice to him, Thus concluded the happy marriage with him.

Elizabeth resourcefulness, have courage, visionary, have very strong self-respect, and be good at thinking. It is because of this quality, just make her have independent opinion on the emotional problems, and prompted her and the darcy composition content family.

Books as the name implies, pride and prejudice, and in the book is male leading the obstacle of the love, but in the real society is also a communication barriers between people, but also in the right attitude towards themselves, treat things in a stumbling block. In real life, we will also often because of his unilateral idea but myself with others, so we have to overcome the "pride and prejudice", take the initiative to understand others. Each person actually are easy to be driven by their own subjective impression, and therefore easy to incorrect comment on other people, thus caused the misunderstanding between each other. A man give first impression is can affect many things, but not must not change, want to have a more in-depth understanding, in order to have a more objective point argument, just like the heroine of the story of darcys view, is because understanding just change. The book reaction of social reality is so hit the nail on the head, she is about marriage, has nothing to do with love.

伊丽莎白聪敏机智，有胆识，有远见，有很强的自尊心，并善于思考问题。正是由于这种品质，才使她在情感问题上有独立的主见，并促使她与达西组成美满的家庭。

书如其名，傲慢与偏见，在书中是男女主角爱情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。在现实生活中，我们也会经常因为自己单方面的想法而是自己与他人隔开，所以我们要克服“傲慢与偏见”，主动了解他人。每一个人其实都很容易被自己的主观印象所驱使，因而容易对别的人下不正确的注解，进而造成了彼此之间的误会。一个人所给予的第一印象固然可以影响到很多事，但并非一定不会改变，要有更加深入的了解，才能有更客观一点的论点，就好像故事中女主角对达西的看法，就是因为了解才有所改变。此书反应的社会现实确是如此一针见血，她讲的是婚姻，与爱情无关。

每天的傍晚，是儿子学习，我的读书时间，我喜欢这份宁静、温馨和从容。就是伴着这份宁静从容，我读完了英国女性作家简·奥斯汀的代表作《傲慢与偏见》，并看完了它的同名电影与电视剧。虽然上学期间读过这部小说，但也只是走马观花，一味追求故事情节，这次细细品读，才发现它的真正魅力，让人久久回味。

英国女性作家简·奥斯汀出生于18世纪的英国乡村小镇，她没上过正规学校，但受到较好的家庭教育，她终身未婚。奥斯汀的作品以轻松诙谐的笔调，描绘了当时英国乡村中产阶级日常生活与田园风光，尤其是绅士淑女间的婚姻爱情风波，一扫当时文学界假浪漫主义潮流。

《傲慢与偏见》全书讲述了四桩不同的婚姻，展现了奥斯汀的婚恋观，在她眼里，其中的两桩婚姻是不幸的：一是伊丽莎白的好友夏绿蒂、表兄柯林斯的婚姻，完全建立在经济基础之上;二是伊丽莎白的么妹丽迪雅与威尔的婚姻，完全建立在初次相识与美貌之上。夏绿蒂是一个聪明的女子，但却接受了自高自大、愚蠢的柯林斯的未婚，只因家里没有多少财产。对于婚后生活，夏绿蒂也抱无所谓的态度。这样的婚姻状况在现代也非常具有现实意义，我认为单纯的以物质为基础的婚姻是没有生命力的，在一个感情淡而无味的婚姻里，人的乐趣何存?夏绿蒂固然可以把生活安排得井井有条，但是她的精神世界永远是苍白的，她安排与柯林斯每天见面的时间只有几分钟，她是多么聪明，但又是多么可怜可悲啊，一个无财产的女子就这样成为一个时代的悲剧。

伊丽莎白的么妹丽迪雅是另一种情况的婚姻。在五姐妹当中，她行为最为放荡无知，每日只知与军官调情。她贪恋威尔的美貌，冲动的跟威尔——一个表面温文尔雅，实际生活放荡的人私奔，置家人的感受于不顾。后经达西的慷慨解救，两人才苟合结婚，婚后丽迪雅还在家人面前炫耀幸福，实在是一个非常自私自利的女人。嫁给了一个伪君子，可想而知婚后生活如何拮据，全靠伊丽莎白与达西救济生活。

奥斯汀所推崇的是后两桩婚姻：伊丽莎白与达西的婚姻，吉英与彬格莱的婚姻。美丽而文雅的吉英与活泼机智的伊丽莎白对待婚姻的态度是理智聪明的，她们的婚姻建立在爱情基础之上，但也不排除物质与相貌的因素。达西在初次见到伊丽莎白的舞会上并未对伊丽莎白的外貌产生好感，也反感她家人的低俗无知，但是随着越多的接触，发现了伊丽莎白的可爱之处。伊丽莎白也在越来越多的接触中发现了达西的美德，消除了对达西的偏见，成就一桩美满的姻缘。尽管他们在门第与教育上存在差异，但婚姻生活是依然是美满幸福的。

在奥斯汀的笔下没有惊心动魄、激情四射的爱情故事，更多是的理智与道德，所以，奥斯汀的爱情观是理智的。在我看来，爱情是美好的，以爱情为基础的婚姻才能经受住婚后油盐酱醋的平淡，真正的爱情不会因为形体的接近或远离而改变，真正的爱情是日久生情，而非一见钟情。

《傲慢与偏见》在对人性的描写上也是深入的。傲慢与偏见属于人性弱点最常见到的两种。出身高贵、财产雄厚、地位高高在上的上流人最容易染上傲慢的习气，对贫穷、粗俗的人瞧不上眼，达西就是其中一例。而地位低下、财产少而又有强烈自尊心的人在面对骄傲的优越者时则以偏见相对抗，这是另一种扭曲的傲慢，伊丽莎白就是一个典型。伊丽莎白最初看不惯达西的傲慢，受风度翩翩的威尔的蛊惑，更对达西的人格产生严重的偏见，但随着深入了解，才发现误会了达西。但是她能勇敢地纠正自己的观点，摆正自己的态度，这一点是值得尊重的。而达西在初次求婚遭拒的情况下，敢于正视自己的缺点并积极改正，这才成就了这桩美满的姻缘。

不难想象，如果达西在初次求婚遭拒后傲慢依然故我，如果伊丽莎白在了解真相后没有面对达西的勇气，那么他们之间永远都会存在着一条不可逾越的鸿沟。人与人之间相处，总会有摩擦，有冲突，有误会，但只要你勇于面对自己的不足，积极改正自己的缺点，削去自己的棱角，小处说，能达到人人和谐、群组和谐，大处说达到社会和谐、世界和谐

其实我没怎么看过《傲慢与偏见》这本书，但就在前段时间追过这个电视剧，我从中感触多多。

故事里也讲了爱情观。当一个人在一段爱情里卑微到尘埃，那么离结束也不远了。故事里唐楠楠为了心爱的男友将学费让给他读书，自己赚钱养他，最后男友跟富二代在一起，对唐楠楠只说愧疚。在这里，真是心疼她120次，在一段爱情里做到这样真真正我是服了的。

在一段感情里，付出多的那个人最容易受伤，全身心付出，回报也许就是负数。在爱情的脚步中，两个人要步调一致，一个人走太快，另一个人甩太远，很危险。

所以后来与朱侯面临是否分开一年的时候，她选择了悄悄离开，她懂得了不能让爱情成为实现梦想的绊脚石，希望两个人一起进步。

其实故事的结尾还挺让人意外的，我满以为两人在一起了皆大欢喜，这个故事就可以圆满结束了。没想到后面还有这样一段，算是与前面被抛弃的感情有个交代。经历之后，才会成长。

这部影视告诉我们做人不能够恃强凌弱，要与人和睦相处，自己遭到怠慢也要心平气和的对待。在爱情的道路上，不要动不动就倾其所有，很多时候，与其卑微到如尘埃一般让人不屑一顾，不如留一些骄傲和疼爱给

自己，放下自己所有的傲娇与偏见，好好的享受当下的生活，轰轰烈烈的爱一回，给自己一个机会，也给对方一个机会!那句“以爱一个人的名义放弃自己的梦想，会失去自己的自尊”!这句台词很有杀伤力!

这个电影给我印象最深刻的一个画面。现实世界，谁没有遭遇过这样那样的“被偏见”，而有时你无力辩驳。偏见与偏见之间高高垒起的那堵傲娇。偏见即矛盾，矛盾即摩擦，摩擦即火花，火花崩开的笑料。真爱无关金钱，无关社会地位，甚至无关星座合不合，没有固定的公式，大部分都只是偶然发生。

谁的青春没有遇见过几个渣男?谁的过往不曾有过灰头土脸?那些年的年少轻狂，沉淀成现在的成熟老练。梦想、爱情、尊严，年少时热血满腔，如今再回忆，更似是中二附体，饶是成熟的心态，依然无法招架。

Not long ago I just read the English version of "Diary of Anne Frank." In fact, this is not the first time I read this book. When I first read it in elementary school, and read the Chinese version. Then still small, still can not read, that means nothing. Now it seems there feeling very deeply.

Anne Frank was a Jewish girl. She could and ordinary girl, living a happy life, but she was not hiding different parents attic. Anne all day hiding in dark little attic to escape the Nazis killing. She could not get close to nature, can not be friends like before play. In the shadow of the shadow of death, Anne only keep a diary to get through tough every day. For her, the diary as her friends, her only friends can rely on and talk. She wrote in her diary a lot, there are silent on the racial discrimination complaint, more of the outside world, the natural yearning for thinking about life.

From her diary, I can imagine she was helpless, fear, but a more leisurely and calm. This is a great girl.

After reading the "Diary of Anne Frank", my heart is very heavy. Nazi racial discrimination, maiming and killing innocent pretty much the same as Annes children. War is always nasty, it makes human experience is a market catastrophe.

Thank you "Diary of Anne Frank" and let people see the ugliness of war, to get people to think about and condolences for the unfortunate people.

Do not like history repeating itself, pray for world peace forever.

参考翻译

不久前我刚看完了英文版的《安妮日记》。其实这不是我第一次看这本书了。第一次看的时候我才上小学，看的是中文版的。那时还小，还读不懂，觉得没什么意思。而现在看起来，却有很深很深的感触。

安妮 弗兰克是个犹太女孩。她本可以和普通女孩一样过着快乐的生活，但她却不得不同父母躲到阁楼里。小小的安妮整日躲在阴暗的阁楼里，躲避着纳粹的捕杀。她无法亲近自然，无法和朋友们像以前一样玩耍。在死亡阴影的笼罩下，安妮只有记日记来度过难熬的每一天。对于她来说，日记就像她的朋友，她唯一可以依赖和倾诉的朋友。她在她的日记里写下了很多，有对种族歧视的无声的控诉，更多的是对外面世界，对自然的向往，对人生的思考。

从她的日记中，我可以想像出她当时的无助，惶恐，但更有从容和镇定。这是一个了不起的女孩。

看完了《安妮日记》，我的内心很沉重。纳粹的种族歧视，残害了多少像安妮一样无辜可爱的孩子。战争从来都是可恶的，它让人类经历的是一场场劫难。

感谢《安妮日记》，让人们看到了战争的丑恶，让人们去思考，去为不幸的人们哀悼。

愿历史不要再重演，祈求世界永远和平。

Love, what a familiar words, in everyones mind has a pure love, love is selfless love, it is a vast, only live in the ocean of love, just can enjoy love. And I read the education of "love the book, I truly understands love border.

This permeated with the love of the novel contains profound, send out the sort of full-bodied emotional strength is really very great. "Love education" introduces the Italian child amway in a school year ten months of ke is written diary, containing the classmate of love between, the sister and the love between children and parents, teachers and students of love between between love and love for his country, make the person is in love like reading the bosom of growth.

Love is like air, every day in our side, because its no shadow intangible is often ignored by us, but we cant live without it, actually the meaning of it have been integrated into life. But many people cannot feel. Love is great, because it not only to the individual character, but also to the whole nation is proud of dignity and emotions. Love is an endless travel, you walk while watching very relaxed, every day there will also be for something new comprehension, learning and full up. Then, just want to continue to go on, and even enthusiasm, dont care how long it will last. This time, such feelings already sublimate is a love, for a life of love. Read the love of education ", I walk into amway ko life, witnessed how they study, live, how to love. In touched, I find love contain the for the pursuit of living.

Through the ages, how much love true story ah, visible, love is everywhere. We are born, they immersed in the ocean of love, the love of parents and grandparents love. Gradually grew up and went to school, and teachers love, students of love. Love is like air general, love is all around us, we never left it, leaving the love person, is not a soul is a man. Love can make the person rescue, love can make the prodigal son back, love and can inspire people infinite strength.

Is love, that we can be happy grow up healthily, is love, and gives our inner warmth. Interpersonal love is great, love is forgiveness, love is inclusive. Love is the source of love and education, education is closely linked. Many feel a love, it is a more warmth; Give much a love, it is a more happy. In the future days, let us together bathed in the ocean of love.

在傲慢与偏见这部电影中，我很喜欢达西先生，他是一个很呆板中有着羞涩，傲慢中有着可爱的人。然而我想在这部片子中我最印象深刻的是伊丽莎白了。

伊丽莎白无疑是幸运的，除了她自身的优秀与自尊，她对爱情与婚姻的态度都决定着她的不凡，她能够坚守自己对爱情的渴望。对于一个女性而言，她拥有着天真率直以及理智自尊自爱，最重要的更是她的傲骨，她拒绝collins，这不仅是一种勇气也是一种对自身优秀的肯定。优秀的女人会被仰慕，被欣赏，有时也会被贬低，就如鲁迅先生捧与挖中说的一样，压下去，捧起来。虽然很多女性都有了觉醒，但依旧是不够的，对于剩女这个身份，很少有女性欣然接受，但正是剩下了，才是优秀中的优秀，毕竟男性不愿娶一个过于优于自己的女性，无论压还是捧，都不愿娶。

伊丽莎白的确是幸运的，如果自身的优异来源她本身，那么他父亲如此的了解她，也赞同她，就的确是一种运气了。我自始至终都认为班纳特先生最喜欢的一定是这个自信可爱聪明的二女儿，他开明，睿智，虽然有时迫于伊丽莎白母亲的施压，但关键时刻，重要之事，他都会做出最正确的判断，伊丽莎白拒绝collins的之后，他说，如果你不嫁给他，你会和你妈妈绝交。但是，如果你嫁给他，我就会给你绝交。当时真心爱死这个开明的父亲了，可爱，还有点冷幽默。

然而最庆幸的更是MRDary的存在，因为自己的优秀是自己决定的，有长者爱护是比较好得到的，然而要找一个欣赏自己，接受自己的伴侣确实一件难事，这让我想到人生下来就是注定孤独的，因为思想注定是孤独的，世界上没有两个完全相同的人，思想也没有，那么再是知音也不可能完全接纳理解自己。所以能找到一个比较相似(我指的不完全是性格，更多的是人生观价值观世界观诸如此类)的人，也是很不容易的，有的恋人当年爱的死去活来，最后还是一句不合适分手，要融入对方的世界其实很难，尤其是你陌生甚至带有一点排斥的世界。

达西是傲慢的，带有偏见的，伊丽莎白也是如此，正是这样有些相似，再加上价值观也没什么缺陷，于是他们幸福的在一起了，然而并不是所有的伊丽莎白都找的到配得上她的人，灰姑娘的外表高贵的心，这些公主有很多剩了下来。

相信自己，永远没有错。不愿委屈，不仅是孤高，更是爱护自己，自尊自爱自立自强不息。