傲慢与偏见读后感英文【推荐20篇】

傲慢与偏见，是我们很常见的弱点和毛病。每一个人其实都很轻易被自己的主观印象所驱使，因而轻易对别的人下不正确的注解，进而造成了彼此之间的误会。、

《傲慢与偏见》故事主要说的是十八世纪在英国发生的四门婚姻。其中最主要的，自然是发生在女主角伊丽莎白·班纳特与男主角费茨威廉·达西之间的爱恨情仇。伊丽莎白是个勇于追求爱情、漂亮聪明、坚强可爱的中产阶级女子。故事主要以她对达西先生从一开始的厌恶到尊敬，再到爱慕为线索，也穿插了在几个发生在她身边的幸福或不幸的婚姻，揭示了作者对那个时代女人生活与爱情的理想和期望。

故事中女主角伊丽莎白第一眼看到男主角达西就是不顺眼的，加上男主角个性的傲慢，继而对他有了偏见。而男主角达西，是个不受人欢迎的傲慢男子，也不屑于周遭冷淡的人际关系，对他来说，傲慢也许是有理的，偏见却很无情，这两者产生的冲击是免不了的。两个人之间也因此而常有针锋相对的言辞，彼此之间的傲慢和偏见就造成了一开始的不愉快与误解，但是经过种种事件的澄清，彼此又渐渐产生一点点的感情。

达西代表着“傲慢”，伊丽莎白代表着“偏见”，他们一开始都被自己的情绪所牵引。接着一连串对达西不利的流言，更让伊丽莎白对达西反感。当达西向伊丽莎白求婚而遭到拒绝时，他说了一句话：“要是我耍一点手段，把我内心的矛盾掩饰起来，一味地恭维你，使你相信我无论在理智方面、思想方面以及其他各方面，都是对你怀着无条件的纯洁的爱，那么也许你就不会有这些苛刻的责骂了。可惜无论是什么样的伪装，我都痛恨。”达西沒有为了讨好伊丽莎白，而改变他的傲慢性情。伊丽莎白也表现了很真实的自己，彼此都不刻意去营造给人的印象，表现出了最真实的一面。而开始的时候，伊丽莎白一直活在自己的偏见之下，而忽略思考事实的真相，经过达西的解释和自己的判定，才最终找到幸福的归宿。

从中 我们可以知道一个人所给予的第一印象固然可以影响到很多事，但并非一定不会改变，要有更加深入的了解，才能有更客观一点的论点，就似乎故事中女主角对达西的看法，就是因为了解才有所改变.所以学会理解他人。

Its a short story by O.Henry that has moved me for a long time.Maybe most of you are familar with its name,that is,The Gift of the Magi.I have read it many times but every time I like to read it slowly and deliberately.I think "The Gift of the Magi"

is meant to be savored.

Maybe there is no necessity for me to repeat the main idea of the story.But Im

so fascinated with the short story that I want to retell it yo you,and to myself.

It happened to a very poor but blissful young couple named Jim and Della in the end of 18th century in England.Because of the maladies of that society and the effect of economic crisis,they worked hard but earned little.Life is very hard for them.Despite of this,their love to each other and the enthusiasm for life didnt changed at all.When Chrismas day was approuching ,Della used the money she got from selling her beautiful hair which she treasured very much to give Jim a fob for his grandfathers pocket watch.But Jim had already sold that watch to buy Della tortoiseshell combs to wear in her long hair,not knowing shed cut it off.

It appears that the gifts they gave each other have been useless.But I think they gave each other the best of what they had to make the other happy.Isnt that true love?We can image,in such rough conditions,as it said in the story,"Life is made up of sobs,sniffles,and smiles,with sniffles predominating."Itst absolute reasonable for them to be beaten by the misery.But the fact is that no matter how tough life had been,they wouldt lose heart.With strong faith and their love ,they did their best to make the other pleased."Whennever Mr. James came home and reached his flat ,above he was called Jimand greatly hugged by Mrs. James."Maybe this account is the best description of their love and struggle against hard life.It was said that the povertier life is ,the firmer and truer love is."Actually,theyd given the very best they had out of love.

"They are too foolish children in a flat,who most unwisely sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house.But in a last word,to the wise of these days,let it be said that of all who give gifts these two were the wisest."Said the writer in the last paragraph.Yes,they are wisest.They are the magi.Are there any reasons for us not to show respect for the young couple?

I remind my grandparents.They have spent fifty years together.No romantic words,no stirring behaviours,just comman even pedestrian life.But I can say love exists in every detail of their life.They have gone through war period,three years natural disasters,cultural revolution and so on.But no matter what happens,they are always considering for the other.Even now both of them have become old step by step,they still cared about each other.My grandparents,in my opinion,is a pair of lovers forever.

Love has nothing to do with money,possession or status.Its consideration,tolerance and respect.Its giving ones best to the other even it means sacrifice.Its affection which connects two persons hearts,and its reinforced by adversities.

Struggle against adversities.Nothing did they have,at least they owened love.Never give up as long as love exists.From"The Gift of the Magi",from Jim and Della and from my grandparents,I have learned a lot about love,life and hope.

这部出自英国作家奥斯丁之手的浪漫爱情小说，其中一直夹带着浪漫最大的“敌人”——现实!没有浪漫的爱情就失去了其本身的美好的色彩，但小说中种种门当户对等一系列现实问题却充斥其间。

小说共写了四桩婚姻故事，可以说这四桩婚事代表了世界上各种类型的婚姻。文中着重描写的是最单纯、最纯粹的爱情——不是为了财富，不是为了地位，仅仅是和自己所爱的人在一起——达西与伊丽莎白的爱情。

其中最荒谬、最令人不齿的是贝内特家族的小女儿与威科姆的婚事。威科姆是一个表里不一的伪君子，险些欺骗伊丽莎白，后伊丽莎白在其舅舅舅妈的规劝以及自己理智冷静的控制自己的感情之下，没有上他的当。是谎言终究会被揭穿：达西戳穿了他的谎言。可是谁知小女儿放荡无知，竟和他私奔了!最后还是在达西的资助下才有钱成婚，婚后还自诩幸福。这种由无知导致两人不顾一切结婚，自以为幸福，却不知遭了多少人的唾弃、鄙视。

第二桩婚事明显简单了许多：结婚的目的就是为了金钱和财富，没有任何感情基础。夏绿蒂和科斯林可所谓门当户对，金钱成为他们俩唯一的挂钩。虽然婚后并不算幸福，但不得不承认，钱改善了生活，过的并不差。现在像这样为钱而婚的、没有感情的婚姻早已屡见不鲜。

宾利与简的爱情故事算是大众的表现了，两情相悦，众望所归。虽免不了过程有些曲折，但终究在亲友祝福、父母见证下完婚。婚后幸福而美满，和睦且融洽。

达西与伊丽莎白的爱情可算的上是难能可贵了。达西对伊丽莎白的一见不钟情，二见却倾心的感情一直持续了下去，伊丽莎白对他则算是日久生情。两个人闹过矛盾，吵过架，翻过脸，伊丽莎白还曾一度讨厌他，但最后在达西的耐心解释下，一封真情流露的长信，揭穿了威科姆的真实面目，为自己洗脱那些污蔑他的谣言，使伊丽莎白对他刮目相看。后来达西对伊丽莎白一家人给予帮助，一点也没有他那傲慢的特性和那种上流社会的偏见，终于感动了伊丽莎白——她曾今还拒绝过达西的求婚，达西竟然还能伸出援手，不变感情——文中许多描写两人心理的句子很值得回味。两人最终结成百年好合，也算是来之不易的幸福。

全文四桩婚事犀利批判当时社会多数人的婚姻价值观在于金钱财富，而文章中达西与伊丽莎白的爱情故事则犹如镜中花、水中月，似乎遥不可及。所以在追求爱情的路上，一定要坚持自己的信念，不要因为金钱、名利等现实因素而草草决定，要坚持寻找自己的真爱，要学会珍惜相爱的彼此，不要由于别人的一些话而改变自己，相信自己，幸福要自己去经营!

导语：《高老头》这部作品在展示社会生活的广度和深度方面，在反映作家世界观的进步性和局限性方面，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

The sun setting, I pull the curtain aside and open the window, taking a deep breath, and feeling the vicissitudes of life.

Be faced with he money, great father is worth of nothing.

At that time, money is the capitalist new signs of the times, and father is just something that when the patriarchal clan system residual feelings.

Concerning father’s love corroded by money, whats left? Sighing…

Saddened by her solitude in the falling dusk, she is assailed by wind and rain. I never thought that, they decided to choose money instead of love. Extreme egoism flooded all moral principles. Father Goriots property was bled white and abandoned. Originally the spoiling under the money is so heartbreaking.

He was glowing with pain and memory, always hiding in the lonely grave.

Obedient just quietly indulgence, in exchange for you is just being betrayed.

Father Goriot still adhere to love them, as in the past, there is no reason, nor whether it is worthwhile, maybe, in his heart, so this is love.

The story happened in the past, but affects the future.

In our society, who are the only children in us, and it is groeing up in the doting parents’ love ? The same is the interpretation of love, at different times, what is the difference? As children, to accept the same care, what difference does it make? The same parents, giving this selfless care, and usually in the Father Goriot "refuse to realize ones error"?

It is often said, “This is the product of the society”。 Yes, the society originated from the people, for people in the final analysis, it is still the problem! Human nature on the one hand is missing, that led to all the problems of society the arch-criminal.

Their son is of far-reaching.

Ive seen in a magazine that a story:

Kim was born in a rich family. A few years ago parents opened the gold mine and accumulated vast wealth, becoming the richest man in the village. Rich family make little Kim be spoiled, and develop a wayward character that she love leisure and hate labour. She learned to smoke, drink alcohol, and spend a lot of money. In the countryside, her monthly expense is two thousand yuan, let the other kids out of,. When she was lack of money, she would ask parents for money, sometime little criterion thousands, but sometime over ten thousand. Once, she told a lie to his father for money to buy things, opening, f

​

读书笔记——《傲慢与偏见》已经不止一次读过简·奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》，而根据此书改编的电影我也细细看过两回。我想于读者而言，只读一遍，那么这最多只是一个曲折的爱情故事，而再读，便能走出这个爱情故事，在看到主人公身上所暴露出的人性的缺点后，开始去观察当时整个社会的状态，并试着去探索人与人之间正确的相处方式。可以说，整本书从头到尾都离不开两个字：爱情。年轻男女相遇，难免产生爱慕之情，作者在书中塑造了多对情侣，通过不同人之间的对比，向我们揭示了爱情的真谛。爱情在于坚守，在于包容。就如宾利与简，身份的差距让人们对他们的爱情产生了质疑，宾利自己亦曾迷茫过，在达西和妹妹卡罗琳的劝说下狠心离开过简。

但简对宾利却始终一往情深，站在爱情的原点，守护着一颗爱慕之心，当误会解除，宾利重又回到她的身边时，她选择包容，与宾利言归于好。这才是真正的爱情，被守护，被包容，最终得以绽放。爱情又在于理解，在于尊重。就如本书的男女主人公，初识于舞会，他们便有了误会，一个傲慢冷漠，一个满心偏见。从最初的争吵，到对彼此产生好感，他们二人都走在理解的路上，一个逐渐改变自我，一个则逐渐消除内心的偏见。尽管这条路并不好走，但他们最终都学会了尊敬对方。达西先生对伊丽莎白不再态度傲慢，尊重她的选择，而伊丽莎白也放下了满心的排斥，与达西走到了一起。这让我们明白，使我们清醒，真爱不是三两天的激情和冲动，而是缓缓的靠近，心贴心的理解，和一辈子的彼此尊重。而再看书中夏洛特这个角色，她的感情掺杂了太多的虚伪与功力，没人能有底气称之为爱情。她选择了呆板而愚蠢的柯思林——这个班纳特家财产的继承者，她把婚姻和爱情当做了交易，一场为了日后生活有保障而进行的交易。这样的爱情观，不仅存在于她身上，更存在于当时社会万千的民众身上，未婚女子总希望嫁一个黄金单身汉，过上幸福的一生，而父母们也总盼着女儿嫁得一个富有的女婿，自己可以小捞一笔。这些盲目的追求恰恰与书中主人公的想法产生了极大的冲突，让读者不禁慢下来思考爱情的本质和意义。

试问，全然用金钱所伪装的爱情，又怎会拥有定性，足以维持一辈子，又怎能成就美好，带你走进年少时最渴望的生活。唯有放下心里的杂念和贪欲，还原爱情纯粹的面貌，才能够享有真挚的爱情，与相契合的人共度不悔的一生。这不单单只是一个爱情故事,爱情发生的过程里,往往有难以言说的困难。对于男主人公而言，这困难是傲慢。显赫的贵族出身，巨额的家财，英俊的外表，这一切都成就了一个傲慢自大的达西先生。第一次与伊丽莎白相见，他的表现就述说着他内心的冷酷与势力。参加舞会的大多是年轻而又想求得一金龟婿的女子，他不屑同她们交涉，尽管在场的男士很少，他也不愿加入跳舞的队列中去，而他第一次对伊丽莎白的评价则是“她还行，但是并不很漂亮”，这让伊丽莎白一下子产生了厌恶感。达西的傲慢在他第一次向伊丽莎白求婚时，被展现得更为彻底。不似常人一般告白，他没有再多地表达内心对伊丽莎白的爱慕，没有夸赞伊丽莎白的美貌或内在，不懂得迎合，而是更多地在谈他们间地位的悬殊，种种表现都仿佛像在说：“你这般的地位嫁给我是多么幸运的一件事，答应我是最好的选择。”换做一般女子，或许早已不管不顾从了达西。而女主人公却偏偏是伊丽莎白，一个倔强不屈、独立自强的灵魂，她厌恶阶级间的差别，厌恶自负冷漠的富家子，她的出现，对从小随着傲慢与沉默成长的达西是一个很大的打击，这也正说明了傲慢自负终有一天会被重重绊倒，得到相当的教训。我想作者不光光是在谈达西的傲慢，更意在通过文字启发世人，减退读者心里的傲慢。

傲慢的人能够安稳处世一时，却不能够长及一世。傲慢的人能够碰到三两个容忍他的人，却不能令所有人对之忍让。傲慢徒会自毁形象，招致他人的厌恶罢了，“谦谦君子”才是古往今来众人所好。看过了达西先生，我们也该低头自省，是否仍在用傲慢处世？是否已渐渐远离了人群？ 傲慢是一方面的困难，而另一方面的困难则在于女主人公。美丽自信的伊丽莎白出生在中产阶级家庭中，身边满是渴望嫁与贵族的小姐们。相当的学识与教养却让她对婚姻和爱情有独到的见解，她的认识里，婚姻基于理性的选择和真正的爱情，金钱、权利都应被排除在婚姻的门外，最为珍贵的是人的品性。在那个男权仍是强大的时代，她追求平等，追求真爱，是十分难得的。然而当达西走进了她的生活，她开始对自己，对达西产生了认识上的偏差，也就是书题所说的偏见。达西对她家人的厌恶，以及对他们两者间阶级差距毫不避讳的揭露，都令她产生了自卑感。又正是这种自卑感作祟，让她眼中走出的达西先生成了一个彻头彻尾的傲慢男人。她独立的性格和独到的见解都促使她拒绝了达西的爱慕，以致这场爱情波澜不断。就像书中人物向我们传达的一样，社会地位的差距和生活环境的差异往往会带来内心的变化和异样。处于高人一等的位置上时，这变化是高傲，我们不再平心静气待人，而是不自觉地嫌恶，排斥每一个达不到内心标准的细节，偏见随之产生。处于低人一等的位置上时，这异样是自卑，我们不再自信自得，而是一意想要维护自我的尊严，不辨事实真相，进行不经思考的反抗，偏见亦随之产生。无论走到哪一步，偏见都难以避免，但对此我们并不是束手无策。既然意在免去偏见带来的隔阂与困扰，那么就该坦然接受它的存在，并改变它指向的方位，不是独独指向他人，而要从自身找出薄弱处，完善自我的认识。有了这些意识，偏见才能化为正确的见解，不再轻易斩断人与人之间的紧密联系。谈完了这些，让我们再回到全书的正题。“傲慢与偏见”，这傲慢在于达西，这偏见在于伊丽莎白。作者巧妙地用两个词语形象地概括出了两个主人公，又以主人波澜不已的爱情过程为世人带来启示。傲慢与偏见，两者无一可取。谦逊待人、公平对事，方是处世与谈感情的妙计。

一读《傲慢与偏见》，能够邂逅一场爱情；再三读《傲慢与偏见》，却能在书中捕捉到现实社会的缩影。作者简曾提到她创造了一个现实中少有的优秀的达西先生，然而我想，她并不单单是塑造了一个人物，而是点亮了人心底最强烈的欲望。像达西这一类英俊富有的先生，必然为众多少女所倾慕和追求，少女们不顾他们性格如何，品格如何，光光只看他鼓囊的钱袋，显赫的家世，俊朗的外表，便倾心于他，她们的父母也是加以支持，盼望如此的佳婿走进自家的门来，自此家门荣光。这展现了当时社会的浮躁和功利，社会地位，金钱权利，都牢牢掌控着每一个人的思维，真爱往往被现实所击败，失去了应有的力量，褪去了应有的色彩。再观当今社会，又何尝不是这样，物欲横流，攀权附贵，凡事都难免为金钱所影响，有独立个性的人，又能有几个？真挚忠贞的爱情又能残存几分？哪怕是20出头的大学生谈恋爱，都不得不先考虑家庭条件、门第等因素，更何况在社会上行走多年的男男女女。

但可喜的是，作者创造了一个伊丽莎白，尽管深陷物质社会，她却依旧保持清醒，凭着自己的学识和修养，懂得适时拒绝，懂得适时接受，勇敢地追求真爱。这让我们相信社会再不明朗，也总有清醒和不屈的人，我们不该只是让伊丽莎白活在心中，更要让她活在我们的身上，以带领我们去纠正这个社会扭曲的婚姻观和价值观。我永远也无法放下《傲慢与偏见》这本书，它在我人生的路上不断地给予我警示。得意时，是否不觉傲慢？失意时，又是否不觉自卑？对于眼前这个人，是否公平，亦或是存有偏见？常常问问自己，也才能生活得更安心、，更忠于人生的本意和价值。

Book Review: “Camille”

I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800s, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.

However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armands father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armands reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumass last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.

As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.

Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.

Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?

Based on Mark Twains novel, The Millionaire Pound Note takes an interesting satirical look at the hypocrisy stemming from class distinction in the 50s England. England is a country where class and wealth are given extreme significance, especially among the rich. The film shows the hypocrisy that existed among these people, how the rich are quick to change face when in an instant they find out that youre a man of wealth and how within the next moment they revert back to their condescending selves when all wealth is lost.

Interestingly, The Millionaire also briefly looks at how the English perceived Americans in that era. Rich Americans were welcomed as outsiders and the poor were quickly shunned away. The fact that hes an outsider either makes him more appealing or the complete opposite. The story sticks to the main theme by emphasizing on the hypocrisy of the upper class society but at the same time it also creates a balance that prevents the movie from being a mockery of the British society. The movie drags at some point but the love story appears at the right time and there is plenty of comedy to keep one entertained. A charming Gregory Peck totally nails the part and the luminous Jane Griffiths is a treat. Reginald Beckwith, as Pecks sidekick Rock is amusing. The ending is a little predictable but the director does an overall good job by rounding it up and presenting his points.

百万英镑读后感英文【3】

Mark Twains short story of "one million pounds" is a very good work. The article on the "money is everything," "money is omnipotent," the idea of a satire, to expose the ugly face of capitalist society.

"One million pounds" is about a poor, honest man, that is, the heroine of this story has received a pair of brothers, the letter sent to him inside one million pounds. The brothers had made a bet, gambling, if a poor, honest people who come knocking on the door received the one million pounds, he will be what kind of results? Brother that he would starve to death because he could not prove that the money was his own, will be subject to other peoples doubts, and even the banks do not let him save money. His younger brother that he would lead a very good, and therefore they have the brothers of one million pounds will be loaned to check the poorest people, and spent 30 days abroad. Did not expect that during this period of time, people have the rare fortune suddenly rich, has tried to cozy up to him, from the free food, buy clothes, free accommodation, like a beggar, like to please him, and continue to improve his social status until the exception of the highest outdoor Wang Duke on! Not only that, he also has been a good wife and 30,000 pounds of bank interest, and finally from two brothers got a very good job. Lived a very, very happy life.

See here, I am so envious of the "lucky" the heroine, but at the same time I would like to: people reason to curry favor with him, not just because when people value money too it? Worship of money is shameful and should not be reaping more! Money is not omnipotent, the world than money, there are many more important things … …

《傲慢与偏见》是简·奥斯汀的代表作。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的资料和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。

《傲慢与偏见》在书中是男女主角感情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。人的缺陷太多，首先是心灵上的陷阱。要想在一生中成就一番事业，无论是知识、教养、还是感情、事业，都需要同自己心灵的种种浅浮的陷阱或阴影做斗争，经过各种误解和长时刻的反复的认识过程，慢慢由心灵克服各自弱点和毛病，而走向开放、洒脱、自由的必然结果。扰扰尘世，做人不易;茫茫人海，佳偶难见。然而没有感情不好勉强别人结婚，只要人品正直，追求美德，不放松向喜之心，不苟且、贪图一时之利欲，追求两心之和谐、相应，运用彼此的智慧，克服心灵上的缺点，终得如愿以偿。

人和人之间的相处总会有一些小小的摩擦，而这些摩擦，往往就是自己内心中所潜藏的弱点或毛病，要和别人能够更愉快的生活，就务必先了解到自己的缺点，并磨去他，其次是了解别人的内心，最后再互相深入彼此，如此一来，你会发现到社会上每一件人、事、物都是如此完美、光明，更进一步激发出你内心深处的感动，发挥出自己的专长去替这个社会、这个国家、这个世界服务，毕竟我门是万物之长，如果人们不再用心去关怀身边的人，不再去付出自己的一臂之力，那么还有谁要去完成这个任务呢?因此从此刻开始，我们就就应将自己原先所存有的毛病给除去，换上一个全新的自我，为崭新的未来打拼吧!

“傲慢让别人无法来爱我，偏见让我无法去爱别人。”太过傲慢，太过自傲，太过自我，让你对我退避三舍;太过片面，太过偏激，太过偏见，让你对我束手无策。在这一场傲慢与偏见的对峙中，在这一场自由与真爱的抗争中，在这一场尊严与人格的争斗中，我不知何时对你动了心，你不知何时为我伤了情。

《傲慢与偏见》这部小说主要讲述的是：有一位小乡绅名叫班纳特，他有五个待字闺中的掌上明珠，这五个姑娘都各具特色，别有一番风情，也都拥有各自的恋爱观，人生观和择偶观。尤其是他那位二女儿伊丽莎白，更是小家碧玉，如花似眷，她的美就算用惊心动魄来形容也不为过。不过伊丽莎白最打动人心的，最勾人心神，还要数她那一身傲气，一腔志气，以及一心自强，自尊，自爱。

有一次娇美却好强的伊丽莎白在舞会上邂逅了故事的主人公达西，人人都以为这位家境殷厚，腰缠万贯并且风度翩翩的俊朗男子本该是伊丽莎白的白马王子，命中注定，可偏偏却事与愿违，好事多磨。伊丽莎白听闻达西为人傲慢，于是对他的好感荡然无存不说，还处处挤兑他，时时排斥他，这让对她一见钟情的达西心烦不易，苦恼不已。不过随着两人渐渐深入交流之后，他们总算是解开了心结，解除了误会，认清了彼此，爱上了对方。

故事的结尾是以人人乐道的喜剧收尾的作文/，伊丽莎白和达西经历了一番周折，经受了一番考验后，总算是看清了彼此，弄清了真心。伊丽莎白解除了对达西的偏见，达西也放下了自己长久的傲慢，两人可谓是上演了一场“有情人终成眷属”的好戏。

关于伊丽莎白与达西的爱情，无论多少赞美之词，不论多少人仰慕之词都难以表述，难以形容，毕竟在那个封建的时代，在那个女性饱受压抑的年代，能找到一个喜欢自己的人实在是太不容易了，能找到一个自己也喜爱的人更是一件不简单的事，而能找到彼此都深爱着对方的伴侣更是难上加难了。

不过对于伊丽莎白这位坚强又果敢的女性，我却有说不完的赞美，讲不完的钦佩。伊丽莎白不在乎权势，也不看重地位，相反，她一直在寻求一份纯洁的爱恋，渴求一份真心的爱情，寻找一个真心的爱人，得到一次美满的婚姻。为了实现自己的愿望，为了得到自己的爱情，伊丽莎白不惧怕自己与达西悬殊的地位，不害怕未来道路上的重重苦难，勇敢的选择站在达西身边，与他共享爱情盛宴，与他共度漫漫人生。试问，这样一个追求自由，追求爱情的女孩，怎不让人心动呢?这样一个刚强勇敢的女性，怎不叫人佩服呢?

伊丽莎白这个伟大的女性，让我们看到了什么是自尊自强，什么是自爱自惜，什么是坚毅果断，什么是理智成熟，什么是励志励诚，什么是人间真爱。

我很久以前就有机会看《傲慢与偏见》，但说句心里话，当时我并不认为这本书有多好，甚至只看了个开头就放到了一边，心想：语言如此贫乏，故事又无激动人心之处，怎么会成为世界名著呢?

这次我是在偶然间弄到这本书，由于书的主人极力推荐，我满腹狐疑，才决定看完之后再对此书下一个自己的定论。这种想法推动下，我花了一些睡觉时间将它看完，于是对它的看法大为改观(当然，假如一点好感都没有，那我也就没那种耐心用睡觉时间来看它了)。

不过，我这里所谓的改观，并非指完完全全、彻彻底底地改变了原先的看法。我所谓的改观，是指现在才发现它并非毫无优点。

先说说我发现的优点吧。从风格上看，它有与众不同之处，这是毫无疑问的，大多数书都是从男性的角度看世界，即使是《简·爱》和《呼啸山庄》，也基本上从男性的角度来写，而《傲慢与偏见》则明显地充满了女性思想色彩，包括世界观及生活方式。这一点在写作内容上得到最好体现：假如是男作家，写出的作品大多具有惊险色彩(只是强弱一些的问题)，而本书中，最激动人心的一段也不过是威克姆与伊丽莎白之妹私奔(而且结局并不悲惨)，作者能想到的最恶劣的行径，也只是一些人与人之间的简单欺骗;贯穿全文的一件事就是母亲如何嫁女儿。这一系列的事实，都表现了这本书的女性化，而这类书在那个时代当然极少，所以我认为这是本书极大的成功之处。

一部好的小说应当可以反映一个时代的风貌，就这一点而言，此书也表现得相当成功。读了这本书，头脑中不难形成当时欧洲女性社会的状况——所有女子都以嫁出去作为一种荣誉，而不管嫁给谁，婚娶成了妇女唯一的人生目标，真正的感情既少见，又难以被理解，作者深刻揭露与批判的正是这些。

谈到缺点，我想与其他书作比较：就运用语言的能力而言，它不及《基督山伯爵》;就故事的曲折丰富性而言，它不及《乱世佳人》;就表现社会现实的高度而言，它不及《钢铁是怎样炼成的》;就人物心理描写而言，它不及《呼啸山庄》。虽然这些缺陷很大程度上是由它要描写的社会现实决定的，但一本名著出现这么多的漏洞，毕竟是太过分了。

读完这本书，我极想将它与《乱世佳人》进行完全深入的对比。这两本书在故事内容，情节发展上太相似了，就连人物选取也如出一辙：达西对应瑞德，伊丽莎白对应斯佳丽，宾利对应维希礼，简对应媚兰。前两者间关系都由感情封冻到暖化，再到热烈;后两者的感情则始终如一。唯一不同之处是，前者以和平为背景，后者以战争为背景。所以我将《傲慢与偏见》称为和平版《乱世佳人》，试想，让宾利处在乱世，他必然会与维希礼一样落魄。相反，维希礼在开始时也是十分体面的绅士。

但在感情的激烈斗争与转化上，《傲慢与偏见》完全无法与《乱世佳人》对比，《乱世佳人》以战争为背景，那么感情冲突自然容易表现，尤其是战争的宏大场面(例如亚特兰大溃退，北军围城)，这一幕幕都是如此激动人心，以至于读者难以释卷。这些对《傲慢与偏见》来说是无法达到的艺术效果。对整场战争及战后的社会问题，《乱世佳人》也都表现得很成功，于是这本书的境界也就由儿女私情升华为对国家、对社会的深刻思索，这些也是《傲慢与偏见》的匮乏的东西。

从整本书的艺术性来看，《傲慢与偏见》的确不及《乱世佳人》。但这在深刻思索后的确不难发现，也不难理解。奥斯丁作为女作家，并无太多人赞同(当时社会意识就认为女子无法写小说)，这当然造成了女作家在许多写作才能上不及男作家(例如世界观及知识的丰富性)。尽管我可以原谅这些不足，但相对于同样的女作家夏洛蒂与艾米莉，奥斯丁也显然有这些方面不足。所以至今我还坚信，《傲慢与偏见》的确有许多过人之处，但毛姆将它列为世界十大著名小说之一就未免言过其实了。

嗅着鼻间萦绕着的淡淡墨香，翻阅着手中的书页，细细品读着眼前的字里行间。和往常一样，我从奶白色的书架上轻轻地抽出了一本小说——《傲慢与偏见》。

《傲慢与偏见》是英国女小说家简·奥斯汀的创作的长篇小说。书中展现了英国中产阶级的一些日常生活和田园风光，在英国小说历史上揭开了新的一页。以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。

小说中描写了小乡绅班纳特五个待字闺中的千金，主角是二女儿伊丽莎白。她在舞会上认识了达西，但是耳闻他为人傲慢，一直对他心生排斥，经历一番周折，伊丽莎白解除了对达西的偏见，达西也放下傲慢，有情人终成眷属。

“傲慢使人无法爱我，偏见使我无法爱人。”伊丽莎白在追求爱情的路上，一直坚守自己最初的信念，没有被当时门当户对和金钱财富地位所停止自己的脚步，坚持寻找着自己命定的缘分之人。她把握着自己的命运，终获得了一份美好的姻缘。她的性格与精神，无不让我深深的钦佩着。除此以外，她得知自己误会达西后，向达西承认了自己的错误与爱意。就如书中所说“爱是摈弃傲慢与偏见之后的曙光。”

骄傲多半不外乎我们对我们自己的估价，虚荣却牵涉到我们希望别人对我们的看法。“要是他没有触犯我的骄傲，我也很容易原谅他的骄傲。”

傲慢与偏见，往往会成为人们交流的障碍。“如果你果真聪明的过人，那么你的傲慢就会有分寸。”没有分寸的傲慢，是一种无知的表现，是幼稚和自负的可怜。适当的傲慢是骄傲，而过度的傲慢是虚荣。

有人曾说，《傲慢与偏见》是一本最适合女生看的爱情教育小说;也有人说，女孩儿爱这本书就像男孩爱基督山伯爵一样。大概是因为伊丽莎白与曾经憧憬爱情的我们是那么的相似，才让我们这样有所感触。因为傲慢，所以有时我们会将别人置之千里之外，包括我们所爱的人;因为偏见，我们会对别人产生异样的眼光。

伊丽莎白的倔强个性曾使她一度远离她的真爱达西，而独立的魅力也让达西逐渐向她靠近。真爱路上注定布满坎坷，但无论发现怎样的意外，都要保持一颗独立且珍惜的心，发下身段和地位，去勇敢前行。书中圆满的结局我深感欣慰，更默默期盼着，愿所有人都能有理性与感性的交融，真正独立的经营自己的幸福人生。

Notre Dame DE Paris is the French Victor Hugo wrote. First of all, he is bell ringers Quasimodo ugly, hes ugly, let a person feel afraid: horseshoe mouth, in the right eye is covered with a large tumor, big buck teeth... . Quasimodo is deaf, kyphosis, and the lame, and cruel and unreasonable, who saw all hate him.

Gypsy girl esmeralda has fairy beauty, love as long as she appeared, would have caused a sensation. All the men in the book saw she will fall in love with her. She was very kind, in order to save the poor poet and his false get married, she gave her money to busk income homeless children.

This book mainly to write only listen Quasimodo raised by his vice bishop Notre Dame DE Paris, but vice bishop assassinated, esmeralda royal captain of love, also forced love, esmeralda to marry her, or she was hanged. When love the esmeralda condemnation of that day of, Quasimodo brave love, esmeralda to Notre Dame tower. But the king sent against the cathedral of Notre Dame, and the girl hanged. Quasimodo grieving, and finally find love, esmeralda bones, committed suicide in beside her.

巴黎圣母院是法国维克多.雨果写的。首先他讲的是敲钟人卡西莫多的丑陋，他的丑陋让人感到 害怕：马蹄形的嘴巴、右眼被一个大瘤遮盖，大龅牙……。卡西莫多也是个聋子、驼背和瘸子，而且凶暴、蛮横，谁见了都讨厌他。

吉普赛少女爱森梅拉达有仙女般的美貌，只要她一出现，就会引起轰动。这本书中所有男人一见到她就会爱上她。她非常善良，为了救穷诗人和他假结婚，她把自己卖艺所得的钱都分给流浪孩子。

这本书主要写卡西莫多只听抚养他长大的巴黎圣母院副主教的话，但副主教刺杀了爱森梅拉达爱的皇家卫队长，还逼爱森梅拉达嫁给她，否则将她绞死。当爱森梅拉达受刑的那天，卡西莫多勇敢的把爱森梅拉达举到圣母院的钟楼上。可国王派人攻打圣母院，并将姑娘绞死。卡西莫多悲痛欲绝，最后找到爱森梅拉达的尸骨，在她旁边自杀了。

I first read "Jane Eyre" in eighth grade and have read it every few years since. It is one of my favorite novels, and so much more than a gothic romance to me, although thats how I probably would have defined it at age 13. I have always been struck, haunted in a way, by the characters - Jane and Mr. Rochester. They take on new depth every time I meet them...and theirs is a love story for the ages.

Charlotte Brontes first published novel, and her most noted work, is a semi-autobiographical coming-of-age story. Jane is plain, poor, alone and unprotected, but due to her fierce independence and strong will she grows and is able to defy societys expectations of her. This is definitely feminist literature, published in 1847, way before the beginning of any feminist movement. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why the novel has had such a wide following since it first came on the market. It is also one of the first gothic romances published and defines the genre.

Jane Eyre, who is our narrator, was born into a poor family. Her parents died when she was a small child and the little girl was sent to live with her Uncle and Aunt Reed at Gateshead. Janes Uncle truly cared for her and showed his affection openly, but Mrs. Reed seemed to hate the orphan, and neglected her while she pampered and spoiled her own children. This unfair treatment emphasized Janes status as an unwanted outsider. She was often punished harshly. On one occasion her nasty cousin Jack picked a fight with her. Jane tried to defend herself and was locked in the terrifying "Red Room" as a result. Janes Uncle Reed had died in this room a little while before, and Mrs. Reed knew how frightened she was of the chamber. Since Jane is the narrator, the reader is given a first-hand impression of the childs feelings, her heightened emotional state at being imprisoned. Indeed, she seems almost like an hysterical child, filled with terror and rage. She repeatedly calls her condition in life "unjust" and is filled with bitterness. Looking into the mirror Jane sees a distorted image of herself. She views her reflection and sees a "strange little figure," or "tiny phantom." Jane has not learned yet to subordinate her passions to her reason. Her passions still erupt unchecked. Her isolation in the Red Room is a presentiment of her later isolation from almost every society and community. This powerful, beautifully written scene never fails to move me.

Mrs. Reed decided to send Jane away to the Lowood School, a poor institution run by Mr. Brocklehurst, who believed that suffering made grand people. All the children there were neglected, except to receive harsh punishment when any mistake was made. At Lowood, Jane met Helen Burns, a young woman a little older than Jane, who guided her with vision, light and love for the rest of her life. Janes need for love was so great. It really becomes obvious in this first friendship. Helen later died from fever, in Janes arms. Her illness and death could have been avoided if more attention had been paid to the youths. Jane stayed at Lowood for ten years, eight as a student and two as a teacher. Tired and depressed by her surroundings, Jane applied for the position of governess and found employment at Thornfield. The mansion is owned by a gentleman named Edward Fairfax Rochester. Her job there was to teach his ward, an adorable little French girl, Adele. Over a long period the moody, inscrutable Rochester confides in Jane and she in him. The two form an unlikely friendship and eventually fall in love. Again, Janes need for love comes to the fore, as does her passionate nature. She blooms. A dark, gothic figure, Rochester also has a heart filled with the hope of true love and future happiness with Jane. Ironically, he has brought all his misery, past and future, on himself.

All is not as it seems at Thornfield. There is a strange, ominous woman servant, Grace Poole, who lives and works in an attic room. She keeps to herself and is rarely seen. From the first, however, Jane has sensed bizarre happenings at night, when everyone is asleep .There are wild cries along with violent attempts on Rochesters life by a seemingly unknown person. Jane wonders why no one investigates Mrs. Poole. Then a strange man visits Thornfield and mysteriously disappears with Mr. Rochester. Late that night Jane is asked to sit with the man while the lord of the house seeks a doctors help. The man has been seriously wounded and is weak from loss of blood. He leaves by coach, in a sorry state, first thing in the morning. Janes questions are not answered directly. This visit will have dire consequences on all involved. An explosive secret revealed will destroy all the joyful plans that Jane and Rochester have made. Jane, once more will face poverty and isolation.

Charlotte Brontes heroine Jane Eyre, may not have been graced with beauty or money, but she had a spirit of fire and was filled with integrity and a sense of independence - character traits that never waned in spite of all the oppression she encountered in life. Ms. Bronte brings to the fore in "Jane Eyre" such issues as: the relations between men and women in the mid-19 century, womens equality, the treatment of children and of women, religious faith and hypocrisy (and the difference between the two), the realization of selfhood, and the nature of love and passion. This is a powerhouse of a novel filled with romance, mystery and passions. It is at once startlingly fresh and a portrait of the times. Ms. Bronte will make your heart beat faster, your pulse race and your eyes fill with tears.

直到昨天，我才真正读完了这一整本书，这本书是上周日买的，看的速度似乎慢了点儿!

它是英国的简·奥斯丁的作品，这部小说的主题是爱与婚姻，全书或详或略涉及到了五门婚事：作者主要着墨于伊丽莎白和达西，这两人的性格大不相同，伊丽莎白外向，活泼可爱，达西内向给人的感觉是非常傲慢，他们第一次相逢在舞会，达西得罪了伊丽莎白，后来伊丽莎白又听信了别人对达西的中伤，觉得达西可恶极了，同时两人的门第与财产有别，达西大富大贵，伊丽莎白家只算中产阶级，由于父母膝下无儿，财产还得由一个远亲继承。最糟的就是伊丽莎白的母亲脑子笨，经常出洋相妹妹也行为不俭，都被达西瞧不起。然而达西喜欢伊丽莎白的聪明，渐渐喜欢上了她把门第抛之脑后，伊丽莎白了解到了事实的真相后，不但消除了误会，发现达西的心地善良、品德高贵，而且觉得他们俩不同的性格正好互补。这两人的婚姻是美好的婚姻。

伊丽莎白的姐姐简和宾利的婚姻与伊丽莎白的有共同之处，就是既有感情又有财产做基础。

伊丽莎白的妹妹莉迪亚是真心喜欢威克姆的，最后与威克姆结了婚，却不幸福。她单纯追求外在美不问其他，尽管如愿以偿得到了一个美男子却与幸福绝缘。威克姆金玉其外，败絮其中刚开始时迷惑了包括伊丽莎白在内的几乎所有姑娘，但最终上当的是莉迪亚，原因是莉迪亚虚荣心太重。

伊丽莎白的好友夏洛特与牧师柯林斯的婚姻另属一种情况，夏洛特长得不算好看，又没啥财产难于出嫁，所求不在爱情，只在生活依靠，而柯林斯只要娶到女人就行，所以两人一拍即合，他们的婚姻远远比不上伊丽莎白和达西、简与宾利却胜过莉迪亚和威克姆，虽然谈不上爱情、幸福，却有满足、太平。

伊丽莎白的父母的婚姻又十分特殊，他们有财产，但没有爱情，伊丽莎白的父亲年轻时认为美貌女子能给他带来幸福，也如愿以偿，娶到了一位漂亮的姑娘，婚后却发现与美貌而不聪明的女人共度一生索然无味，他的生活宽裕，却情感空虚。

这五门亲事作者没有各表一端，而是通过主人公伊丽莎白很自然地联在一起。

我读完整本书后就觉得，自己以前做的事太愚蠢蠢了，比如我以前看见长得丑的、不好看的我都不会对他们产生好感，甚至讨厌他们。但是当我读完这本书时，我才明白，一个人如何，不是靠美丑来衡量的，那只是外在的，我们要用心去体会内在的。一个人的长相如何，不能代表他的内心如何。

这本书虽然在写婚姻，但其实揭示的都是这个道理。

如果要用来概括《傲慢与偏见》的内容，那就是：由于两种情绪——傲慢与偏见，而凑合了4起有趣的婚姻。如果要用一句话来阐述《傲慢与偏见》隐含的内容，那就是：从与婚姻看社会。开篇的第一句话便点出了小说的主线——婚姻。而且在那时，仿佛越早结婚，家里人就越有面子。而个人的出身、家人的素质，也会对晚辈的婚姻带来极大影响。

全本小说描绘了许多性格各异的人，可谓是社会一个的缩影。有脾气古怪、专横而不懂得人情事理的妈妈，有高傲、理智的达西先生，有温文尔雅的宾利先生和大姐简……而最让我记忆犹新的，就是威克姆先生。

也许你会觉得奇怪，为什么那个虚假的人，会让我觉得记忆犹新?也许正是因为他的虚假吧。他拥有英俊的外表，可内心却不堪入目。在所有的人面前，他戴这一张厚厚的面具——优雅的举止、讨人喜欢的谈吐，这几乎蒙蔽了所有人。你可以认为这是他的一种能耐，但换一个角度来想想，会怎么样呢?

当威克姆在小镇上到处散播谣言，达西先生没有走出来澄清事实;一直被他欺骗的女主角伊丽莎白是怎样知道他真实的一面的?是达西先生那封充满怨气的解释信;当威克姆欠了一屁股的赌债，又和伊丽莎白的妹妹莉底亚私奔时，是达西先生为他还的债，逼迫他与莉底亚结婚。但他对莉底亚的家人却只字不提。现在你明白了吗?为什么威克姆可以蒙蔽别人如此嚣张?对，因为达西先生的大度。因为他的大度，引来的许许多多的误会，以至于他差点就要失去一份真挚的爱情。

在社会中，像威克姆这样的人实在是太多。有些是被生活所迫，有些则是为了一些个人的利益。不论怎样，大家总是戴着面具。社会是需要，可是过于的宽容只会让那些人更加嚣张、无理。面对别人的过错，我们需要宽容、理解。可面对别人无理的行为，既不要“人敬我一尺，我敬人一仗”，也不可“默默无闻”，我们需要的是适当的反抗和解释，正所谓不平则鸣。

简.奥古斯丁的力作《傲慢与偏见》在将近2020年的历史中，折服过众多的善男信女，通过解除傲慢与偏见给正常沟通造成的障碍，最终演绎出有情人终成眷属，在世上传为佳话。

起初读《傲慢与偏见》是为了消除人们对我的偏见，尤其是剩女们对我的偏见。

昔日的堂堂清华博士后怎么做起剩女的文章?沦落到这地步?鄙视之意溢于言表。

曾经我从事水资源项目的时候也有不少人疑惑，为什么不为诺贝尔努力，做没有技术含量的水?我当时回答是解决我国水资源问题能给国家和社会带来多大的效益?我就算获得诺贝尔奖能够创造这么大的效益?

知识的价值在于它能够给社会带来多大的益处，而不在于荣誉、科技水平等，虽然也有这种因素，但毕竟不是核心的价值。那么给国家带来1-2万亿直接经济价值的水问题的解决应该远远超过获得诺贝尔奖的价值了!如果考虑间接价值恐怕怎么也有5-6万亿吧。所以，我当时就能够义无反顾的执着地追求。

对剩女的问题而言，虽然时代的进步和社会的发展，也许妇女的婚恋早已经不是唯一的生活目的。但是在任何社会，尤其在现在的我国，婚恋仍然是大多数女人的生活最主要的部分，甚至是全部。最少是生活不可或缺的重要部分。如果在很多方面很出色的女孩因为各种原因一时嫁不出去甚至终身嫁不出去，那么可以肯定的说耽误她的终身。如果我能够帮助找到意中人，过着美满的婚恋生活，那么在某种程度上说挽救了她的一生。因为婚恋问题的解决不仅可以使她享受天伦之乐，也可以帮助她在事业上更有信心。如果我解决一群人甚至一个群体的问题，那么这一事情的社会价值将是不可估量的。

当然，我相信绝大多数剩女是最后不会选择嫁不出去甚至终身嫁不出去的!那么在大多数剩女认识到婚恋在她人生中的价值的一天，客观的经济效益也是可以预期的。这样通过产生巨大的社会效益的同时不仅可以挽救我，也许还能够挽救我的事业。

在《傲慢与偏见》文中，我没有想到自己也受到很好的教育，原来我自己的傲慢也是沟通的主要障碍之一。虽然我也是时常告诫自己尽量避免无谓的错误，消除不该有的误解和损失，但是毕竟江山易改本性难移呀!最要命的是我自己有足够的理由并且确信我的观点的时候就是很难做到给人不“傲慢”的印象。我只好更努力学会倾听的艺术消减不良后果了。

I read a very interesting book, the name of the book is called "Tom Sawyer, I like the book in the little hero and some story happened on him.

Tom is a naughty, naive and lively children, but in the eyes of an adult who is also a real bad boy, he naughty, like mischief, play truant, the nature is the norm, not only in this way, he make trouble method also each time, let a person elusive, small-scale operations. Although he is a very bad very bad child, but also to make people laugh: penalty was painting the walls, and could come up with a good way to make a friend for him to complete, and make friends with him to take a variety of foods and toys for a chance to paint the walls. In this way, Tom not only comfortable, leisure and suddenly gained a lot of gifts.

Let me more impressive is the story of Tom and huck and Joe three people formed a team when the pirates fled to a desert island. In this adventure, he met with difficulties, but he didnt lose heart, dont give up, again and again to challenge difficulties bravely, until down with difficulty.

After reading this book, I feel that we meet with difficulties dont get discouraged, and strive to insist on. Tom lives full of sunshine also tells us: as long as there is joy, have a dream, a dream can come true!

我读了一本非常有趣的书，书的名字叫《汤姆索亚历险记》，我很喜欢这本书中的小主人公以及在他身上发生的一些故事。

汤姆是一个顽皮、天真并且十分活泼的孩子，但在大人的眼里他同时也是一个不折不扣的坏孩子，他调皮、喜欢恶作剧、逃学这些自然是家常便饭，不仅这样，他捣蛋的方法还一次比一次厉害，让人琢磨不透，防不胜防。他虽然是一个很坏很坏的孩子，但也会做出让人捧腹大笑的事情：被罚粉刷墙壁，竟能想出好办法让小伙伴替他完成，并让小伙伴们拿各种各样的食物和玩具来跟他换一次刷墙的机会。这样一来，汤姆不光悠闲自在，而且一下子就收获了很多礼物。

让我印象比较深刻的是故事中汤姆与哈克再加上乔三人组成了一个团队逃到了荒岛上当海盗。在这次冒险中，他遇到了种种困难，但他并不灰心，也不放弃，一次又一次勇敢地向困难挑战，直到打倒困难为止。

读了这本书以后，我觉得遇到困难我们不要轻易气馁，而要努力奋斗，坚持下去。汤姆充满阳光的生活里也告诉我们：只要有欢乐，有梦想，美梦便可以成真!

《傲慢与偏见》是一部在文学历史长河中闪烁光芒的著作，平实的题材，生动的形象以及重要的社会意义为本书奠定了极其高的地位。

《傲慢与偏见》是简·奥斯汀的代表作。这部作品以日常生活为素材，一反当时社会上流行的感伤小说的内容和矫揉造作的写作方法，生动地反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。

简·奥斯汀是英国女小说家。生于乡村小镇斯蒂文顿，父亲是当地教区牧师。奥斯汀没有上过正规学校，但受到较好的家庭教育，主要教材就是父亲的文学藏书。奥斯汀一家爱读流行小说，多半是庸俗的消遣品。她少女时期的习作就是对这类流行小说的滑稽模仿，这样就形成了她作品中嘲讽的基调。她20岁左右开始写作，共发表了6部长篇小说。1811年出版的《理智与情感》是她的处女作，随后又接连发表了《傲慢与偏见》、《曼斯菲尔德花园》、《爱玛》、《诺桑觉寺》和《劝导》。

《傲慢与偏见》并没有什么波澜起伏的故事情节，描绘的都是生活琐事，平淡的故事中我看到了作者的别具匠心，大量形容词的运用是为人物形象做了铺垫，极其夸张的表现正是人物性格的体现，善于在日常平凡事物中塑造鲜明的人物形象。

《傲慢与偏见》原名《最初的印象》，是奥斯丁的代表作，通过婚姻问题的描写展示了当时英国社会的生活画面。故事围绕贝内特一家几个女儿的婚姻大事展开。从伦敦新搬来的单身汉阔少宾利先生爱上了温柔美貌的大女儿简，他的朋友达西则倾情于二女儿伊丽莎白。由于她听信了年轻军官韦恩的谗言而对达西产生了偏见致使这桩婚姻进行的十分缓慢。经过一连串有趣的周折后，误会终于得以消除。达西克服了傲气，伊丽莎白也克服了对他的偏见，最后两人终成眷属。与此同时，作品还涉及了另外两对青年男女的结合过程，即已是27岁的夏洛特出于寻找归宿找个可以依靠的有钱人遂于柯林斯结婚，莉迪亚一贯轻浮，与韦恩私奔后，经达西搭救而苟合成婚。奥斯丁正是通过对不同婚姻的描写表达自己对建立在互相理解和真诚爱情基础上的婚姻的赞扬和对以门第财产和情欲为基础的爱情的讽刺。在一定程度上，这部小说也反映了当时英国妇女争取婚姻自主的愿望与理想。

作者在本文中塑造了各种人物对婚姻的不同对待，有姐姐简的一波三折，有妹妹的一味追求外表金钱和地位，和夏洛特与柯林斯的无爱婚姻悲剧，他们虽然说都是对伊丽莎白和达西婚姻的陪衬但是足以看出作者想要表达出自己内心的爱情婚姻观，以及对社会风气的批判。

在批判的同时，作者也褒扬着伊丽莎白和达西的婚姻。他们不顾地位差异，尽管一波三折，但是最终的美满结局就是作者所赞扬的。作者呼吁着女性们要有自己的主见，放远眼见，这样才能去主宰自己的一切，才能促成自己美满的生活。在女性不受公平待遇的社会，他的这种呼吁是难能可贵的。

本书中的语言深刻令人深思，代表了作者对封建制度的不满与抨击，如“对不要脸的人，决不能低估了其不要脸的程度。”而另一方面，也表现出作者对美好爱情的歌颂与赞扬：“将感情埋藏得太深有时是件坏事。如果一个女人掩饰了对自己所爱的男子的感情，她也许就失去了得到他的机会。”

《傲慢与偏见》毫无疑问是一篇不朽之作。

Scarlett , a very personality figures ，the two mans she love ,neither does she know about.To her, I was compelled to admire, admire her strong and brave, admire her to lay down in the environment, farm workers previously suffered education, admire her to disregard the community to create their own expression of the cause .She is in the whole story, all a person full of fighting will full of vitality . I appreciated most , it is this " Tomorrow is another day of hers. " . Promising forever, full of fighting will , will never give up, never desperate. I think Im moved by her.So, whenever I meet difficulty, the mood is not good, I will tell oneself : " Tomorrow is another day. " Gone with the Wind is absolutely a good book that is worth sampling repeatedly, the characters are graceful , the plot rises and falls, exciting boldly and unconstrainedly, though the subjective factor because of the author among them , the appraisal on U.S.A.s Civil War is not objective and overall, but as to angle of literature, this one fine piece of writing generation definitely absolutely, worth visiting.

Author: Antoine de St-Exupery

Main Characters: The little prince, the pilot, the rose, the fox, the snake, etc.

Despite I’ve not in my childhood yet, I still prefer reading fairy-tale stories. The tales, which accompany with me in my old days, often make me think of some precious experience and sensation which only belong to children. This summer I’ve review this kind of tale, which was published in 1940. It’s the world-famous fairy-tale by the French author, Antoine de St-Exupery, The Little Prince.

As many other fairy-tales, the outline of The Little Prince is not very complex. “I”, the narrator of the story, is a pilot whose plane has something wrong and lands in the Sahara. In this occasion, the pilot makes the acquaintance of the little prince, a little boy from another planet, the Asteroid B612. The little prince has escaped from his tiny planet, because he has some quarrel with a rose, which grows on his planet. In that case he left his own planet and took an exploration at some neighbor asteroids.

On his all-alone journey, the little prince meets different kinds of people, which includes a king, a conceited man, a tippler, a businessman, a lamplighter and a geographer. From these people he gets a conclusion that the grown-ups are very odd. Following the instruction of the geographer, he descends in the Sahara, on the earth.

This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following

Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?

The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane

met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In

dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

There is no doubt that Pride and Prejudice is well-known, the book that is written by Jane Austen has an influence on the culture.As far as I’m concerned ,the ending of the fiction is wonderful, Elizabeth and Darcy won their happiness, leading a colourful life .

First of all, let’s learn about the author who is Jane Austen .She was unmarried all her life. She was born in a mid-class family and was brought up in a comfortable environment with harmonious surroundings, so there’s not too many conflicts in her sight neither in her novel. In Pride and Prejudice she talked different ideas about love and marriage through different characters.

Jane Austen disclosed mid-class young ladies’ different ideas of marriage and love through describing the different ways in which the Bennet girls doing with their marriage problems,and this undoubtedly shows the writer’s idea about love and marriage: it’s wrong to get married just for property, wealth and status while neither would it be without caring about those elements.Jane Austen just attached great significance to marriage through her novel

by telling people that marriage should be regarded carefully.

Then, let’s get close to story.The details is that Mr. Bennet is an English gentleman with an estate in Hertfordshire. He has five unmarried daughters but no sons while his inheritance must be inherited by a male, so Mrs. Bennet has been keen to seek husband for her daughters with great enthusiasm.

One day the Bennets had a new neighbor called Bingley who was a wealthy bachelor and followed be the target of Mrs. Bennet. At a ball Bingley fell in love with Jane Bennet who’s the oldest daughter of the Bennets. Bingley’s friend Darcy also came to the ball and struck the sights, many girls liked him while he thought all of them couldn’t suit his preference, including Elizabeth. Mr. Darcy always shows others a impression of pride, having found this Elizabeth began to hate Mr. Darcy.

Before long Darcy fell in love with Elizabeth Bennett because of her lovely behavior, while Elizabeth is disgusted by his pride and has a prejudice about him. The official Wickham was welcomed by the villagers, and Elizabeth also took a shine to him. Wickham told someting about darcy,which increased Eli’s prejudice about Mr. Darcy. At

another ball Mr. Darcy invited Elizabeth to dance with him, but Eli refused him. Eli’s elder male cousin Mr. Collin came to Hertfordshire to inherit the Bennetts property by rules, he wanted to marry with one of the Bennets. Having known that Jane was already engaged with Mr. Bingley, he asked Elizabeth to marry him but was seriously rejected. At last he proposed to Charllote who was Eli’s friend.

Mr. Collins was good at flattering and he got the pastorate with the help of Lady Catherine. Once his family was invited to Rosings Garden by Lady Catherine. Elizabeth also went there with Mr. Collin and Charllote. There she met Mr. Darcy who’s Lady Catherine’s nephew.Then Mr. Darcy came to the Collins’ and confessed his love for Elizabeth, of course he was rejected impolitely.

Afterwards Mr. Darcy wrote a letter to Eli in order to remove her misunderstandings of him. Elizabeth’s uncle and aunt were also impressed by Mr. Darcy’s politeness. Gradually Eli’s prejudice of Mr. Darcy disappeared. Eventually they became couple.

In my opinion ,on the one hand,I think Elizabeth has personality ethic which caused her independent idea about love and marriage and in consequence she earned a happy

life. There’re also Eli’s sisters’ love stories served as contrasts to the female subject’s ideal marriage, such as Charlotte and Collin’s life: they do had a luxury life, but there’s no real love between them and this kind of marriage is surely a tragedy of society.On the other hand,Darcy is brave ,he did do his best to pursuit his love.

As a matter of fact,everyone has shortcomings ,after reading the story ,I did realize that we should find our advantages and disadvantages by ourselves.Moreover,it’s necessary for us to try our best to get over shortcomings.I am aware that we ought to get along with others with the same attitude.The right that seeking for happiness is equal for everyone.therefore,we should value the things that we have,and cherish the chances.

更多热门文章：