检检讨书分几个部分【优秀20篇】

尊敬的老师：

我怀着无比真诚的心情向您写这份检讨!这次犯错误，自己想了很多东西，反省了很多的事情，自己也很懊悔，很气自己，去触犯学校的铁律，也深刻认识到自己所犯错误的严重性，下次一定记住写完完作业去签字，不会再忘记了!

家长签字是有许多好处的：一是家长可以通过签字了解孩子的学习情况，孩子虽然每天都与父母亲生活在一起，但是没有时间关心孩子的学习，有的家长甚至对孩子不闻不问，而且孩子从不把自己的作业给家长看，因此这样的家长并不太了解孩子的学习情况，要求家长签字了，孩子每天都会“自觉”地把自己的作业给家长检查，于是家长就可以利用签字的机会看看孩子的作业，从而了解到孩子的学习情况，并给予相应的引导和教育，“逼迫”学生认真写作业;二是学生逐步有了责任心，每天的作业都给家长看了以后，学生自然有了一定的心理负担，为了不被家长批评，自然就多了一份把作业写认真、写正确的责任，就会“强迫”自己把作业写好。三是加强了教师与家长的沟通。

现在的我们这些孩子都受到家长的宠爱，娇生惯养的多，我们基本上没有经历过苦难的磨练，也就没有坚忍不拔的毅志，学习上表现为：怕吃苦、自觉性差、作业马虎了事，这就需要对我们进行积极的引导，学校教师的教育固然重要，而家长督促和教育更不可缺，教师在不加重家长负担、不加大孩子心理压力、不体罚和变相体罚我们的前提下，与家长密切配合，采取恰当而有效的措施“强迫”我们去认真学习，在“强迫”中也能培养我们良好的学习习惯。

请老师原谅我这一次，下次我一定会自觉自主写完作业及时给父母签字。

检讨人：

检讨日期

尊敬的xx：

第一次模拟考落下了帷幕。在这每一次的人生考验中，总是有人欢喜有人悲。然而不幸的是这一次我成为了后者。半载的辛苦和辛酸苦累换来了的却是失落，让我怀着失落的心情，带着差强人意的成绩，为这个学期画下了一个败笔。原因出在哪里，我做出了深刻思考和反省，经过了深思熟虑，特作出深刻的检讨，有些没有提到之处还请老师和同学们提出批评指正。

我认为此次考试的失利，绝不是一日之工，“冰冻三尺，非一日之寒。”确实，我总结了以下几点：

1、思想觉悟不够深刻。思想觉悟是一个学生具有的基本条件，一个学生的基本任务是什么，就是学习，好好学习。一个正确的思想觉悟会带领我们走向正轨，所谓思想不过关，成绩如何过关。不仅仅是学习，做任何事思想觉悟都是最重要的，也是最关键的。

2、没有端正的学习态度。态度跟思想是相辅相成的。一个正确认真的学习态度是一个学生成才的必备基础，有了正确的思想态度才能正确的对待学习这件事，正确看待考试成绩的重要性，考试是学校对于学生的检测，也是让自己找出不足改正不足的方法，也是学校对学生的一种负责的态度。

3、基本功的不扎实。平时的一个小小的东西都会影响到考试成绩，这是不可否认的。一个字母的背记，每一次简单的验算，每一次刻苦的思考，都是很重要的，我就是没有打下良好的基础，而导致考试成绩的不理想。

4、平时对自己要求过低。有时候人会犯“惰性”，也就是偷个小懒，每个人都有这种惰性，重要的是有的人克制的较好，有的人克制的较差。平时对自己严格要求的人，做什么事情都会对自己严格要求，对待学习更要严格要求。

5、没有一个正确的学习目标。每一个阶段都给自己制定一个小目标的人，往往平时不怎么起眼，到了考试就会大放光彩，因为他完成一个个小目标，从而最终完成一个大目标。然而光有目标没有实际行动也是不行的，一步一个脚印的踏实度过每个目标，你会发现你成功了一大步。正所谓“不积跬步，无以至千里;不积小流，无以成江海”。古人的话都是有道理的。

6、缺乏一定的自信心。人无聪明愚蠢之分，都是平等的，一个人要相信自己可以完成，付出努力就会成功，一个人要是缺乏了自信心，不敢去尝试，不管是学习还是工作都无法成功。俗话说“人不可有傲气，但不可无傲骨”。傲骨指的是什么，就是自尊和自信。

7、缺少“不耻下问”的精神。有时候感觉问问题很丢面子，这是大错特错的。我们都是学生，我们都是来向人家学习的，学习就有不懂的，不懂的就得向别人请教，这是很正常的现象，然而我一直曲解这里的意思。子曰：“三人行，必有我师焉”。每个人都有自己的缺点，每个人也有自己的优点，学习别人的优点，弥补自己的缺点。比如你的数学好，我的语文好，我们就可以互相学习，相互学习，这样同时提高的是双方，也是双倍的。

8、没有一个良好的学习习惯。习惯成自然，一个正确的学习习惯关系着一个人的一生。有的人喜欢给英文备注，其实这也不失为是一种好办法，久而久之就形成习惯，一看到这个单词就能想起自己的备注，这样对于背记有很大的提高。还有人的验算本比有的人的作业本都整洁，这都是好的学习习惯，就算题做错了，回头找找看看自己的验算本，一目了然，知道哪里错了。弄得乱七八糟，自己永远不知道怎么回事。

xxx

20xx年xx月xx日

尊敬的单位领导：

在此，十分抱歉地向你递交我这份工作服务态度恶劣的检讨书，今天上午我在工作当中因为一次工作失误遭到了您的指责，这本是我的失误，我应该虚心接受您的批评。然而我因为今天心情低沉，加上日常脾气就很暴躁，一时冲动对你做了顶撞，还冲动得摔打自己的产品。

现如今，当我冷静下来我深深对自己的所作所为感到愧疚，我经过面壁思过与深刻反省。我深深地觉悟到自己身上有很多缺点、不足需要检讨与改正。

第一，我身为一名产品销售员，工作无疑是需要自己以一份耐心、细致的心态面对的。

第二，在工作期间，遇到错误遭受上司指责，也是无可厚非，自己就应该虚心接受。

第三，身为一名产品销售员，本职工作就要求我对自己的产品十分珍惜、热爱。

综上三点，可见我犯下了多么严重的错误，我的错误，无疑是大大辜负了单位领导对我的殷切期望、关怀，也给单位领导造成了困扰。

最后我写一下对今后保证：第一我保证今后工作期间以极其负责的态度对待工作，要认

真工作，避免出现工作错误。第二，我今后一定痛改前非，彻底修养自身，遇到问题遭受指责虚心接受，尤其是要对领导有尊敬态度。

检讨人：

年-月-日

尊敬的XXX：

我于11月25日在农场茶苑小区新居，按当地习俗举行了入宅仪式，共摆了20桌宴席，招待同事、朋友、老乡、同学等，该事被《南国都市报》报道后，在社会上造成了极大的影响。通过农场党委、场领导的批评帮助，(农垦)总局纪委调查组也对本人所犯的错误进行了批评指正，近两天以来，我针对自己的行为进行了深刻的反省，充分认识到自己所犯错误的严重性，主要有以下几点：

一是做为一名党员干部，没有按照党员的标准要求自己，带头违反了中央的八项禁令;二是放松了个人世界观、价值观的改造，认为按习俗小摆宴席、收点礼金，没有关系，这是旧的思想观念的体现，而自己却没有认识到;三是对个人、单位可能造成的负面影响没有考虑。

摆乔迁宴席大收“红包”，我做错了。我要以正确的态度对待组织的处分。

检讨人：XXX

年月日

尊敬的李老师：

您好，我是四年级(3)班的王鹏，前几天我在课间写李老师布置下来的家庭作业，因为一时觉得写不出来。又为了能够尽快完全作业，轻轻松松回家。我就借了同学的一本数学题练习本抄袭答案，结果被老师发现了。就将我的作业本没收了，老师当面批评了我，并要求我写这篇检讨书。

事后我仔细想过了老师的话，我深刻地知道了自己所犯的错误，我也要主动向老师认错。

李老师，我真的错了，我以后再也不抄袭作业了。因为老师布置的作业就是给我们加深对知识的理解，能够帮助我们巩固知识的。而我却没有深刻明白这一道理，居然为了图省力，图方便就去借同学的习题册抄袭，实在是太不应该了!关于我认为习题难写这一问题，我保证今后我要在课堂上认真听讲，认真思考。上课不做小动作，不随便乱说话，思想不开小差。

我要以实际行动，回报老师的教导之情。争做老师眼中、家里眼中的好学生，以实际行动和良好的成绩为集体争光。

您的学生：王鹏

尊敬的@老师：

对于10月27号下午在教六举行光电工程学院的党员组织生活，我没能参加，为此我感到非常抱歉，违反了组织的规定。那天早上，我出去跑招聘会，走时匆忙忘了给手机充电，致使当天手机一直关机。直到下午面试完以后才回到学校。我虽然我去跑招聘会了，但没有及时向马老师说明情况，无故缺席会议，是一次严重的错误。说明当时自身对这次会议没有作出足够的重视，在思想上出现了不认真和不严谨的不良倾向。对我我做出深刻检讨党员缺席会议检讨书5篇检讨书。

作为一名预备党员，我辜负了组织对我的期望和信任，并没有引起思想上的重视，影响比较恶劣，教训比较深刻。如果不是马老师的及时发现，及时提醒，后果将不堪设想。如果这个思想上的错误早期形成，长期发展，对自己的发展将产生不利影响，百啭千回都不应再犯这样的错误

对此，我做出如下保证：以后我保证积极参加学院党委组织的活动，从思想上给予足够的认识，从行为上给予足够的重视。绝对不会无故缺席类似活动，如有重要事情不能参加，一定经过党委的批准和允许。时时刻刻以一个党员的标准来要求自己，反省自身，检讨自己。并给周围的同学作出榜样，争取早日转正，加入到党组织这个温暖的大家庭中去。

也希望领导和老师能够对我的言行进行监督，并诚恳要求老师对我这次错误行为给予处分。

检讨人：×××

时间：年月日

尊敬的老师：

今天，我怀着愧疚以及懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对上课不认真听讲这种恶劣的行为坚决改正的决心。您曾经一再强调全班同学在上课时要认真听讲，可我却将您说的话当耳边风。老师反复教导、严肃认真的表情仿佛再次出现在我面前，使我深为震撼，也已经深刻认识到这件事的重要性，于是我一再告诉自己一定要把这第一次写检讨当成我的最后一次，不能辜负老师对我的一片苦心。

然而，正如高尔基说过的那样-当你把一件是看得十分重要的时候，磨难和失败就接踵而来了。在老师口若悬河的上着课时，坐在我后面的同学伸了个懒腰，不知道是她的手长还是我坐的太后了，被她碰到了，我以为她有啥事请教我，便回头说了一句“干什么”，当我发现她只不过伸了个懒腰时，便说了一句带讽刺性的话：“嘿，你的手臂可真长，你还没脱离你祖先长臂猴的特征呐!”我说完就向前移动了一些，结果她又动到我了，嘿，这回她把我给惹火了，我回过头对她说：“你再动我你就完蛋了。”没想到这一举一动被我们的数学老师看的一清二楚。哎!悔亦晚矣，悔亦晚矣呀!我知道说出来什么理由都是不能成立的，因为，这所有的借口和问题都是我造成的，未能对老师们的辛勤做出回报，我越来越感到愧疚。

由于我不认真听讲的事情，所造成的严重后果有：让老师担心我的学习。本应上课认真听讲，可我却没能做到，让老师工作分心，同学跟着一起受到更为严重的后果，影响班级纪律违背父母的期盼。作文

如今，大错既成，我深深懊悔不已。深刻检讨，认为深藏在本人思想中的致命错误有几点： 第一：敬爱的老师讲课这么辛苦，我却没能尊重您的劳动。第二：平时上课就有说话习惯，给予了老师一种想法，令我这次被罚做好了铺垫。于是，我决定有如下个人改正措施：

1、 按照老师要求，绝对保证质量的检讨书一份!对自己思想上的错误进行改善以及将今后的促进作用更加强烈，并认清其可能造成的严重后果，三思而后行。作文

2、 制定学习计划，认真克服学习上的讲话、搞小动作的缺点，努力将成绩拉上去，以成绩来弥补我的过错。

3、 让同学们监督我。保证不再出现以上错误。

请关心爱护我的老师继续监督、帮助我改正缺点，取得更大的进步!

经过老婆昨晚一番教诲和今晨煲的电话“心灵鸡汤”，我认识到了自己所犯错误的严重性，老婆平时对我照顾有加，让我饭来张口，衣来伸手，过着神仙一般的日子，我本应该好好去努力提高和完善自己，没想到却在我们感情的上升期，这个关键的时刻迷失了自己，丧失了为老婆奋斗终生的信仰，犯下了令老婆无法容忍的原则错误，我有愧，我有罪。愧对老婆大人多年来的培养和关心，成了历史的罪人。可以说这些错误情节及其严重、态度极为恶劣、行为及其讨人厌。如果换成其他人，早就不会理我了，绝对会抽我100个耳光，然后离我而去，还会背地里面诅咒我。但老婆您不是一般人，您是伟人，您温柔贤惠、心胸宽阔、思想成熟、美丽善良、知书达理、最重要的是您有一个包容我的心。

我深刻的反省以前以及近期我犯的错误，主要错误有以下几点：

第一，有侥幸心理，隐瞒事实。

1、私自往以前的电话卡里充了一百块钱。跟您都谈恋爱了，还吃着碗里瞧着锅里的，这山望着那山高，还在乱看佳缘上的信。这种做法是极其愚蠢的，让老婆误会我拿那个手机卡乱和别人联系。

2、通讯录删的不彻底。由于自己的疏忽大意，通讯录没有删干净，以致于让老婆误会我又恢复了通讯录乱和别人联

系。自己还错误的坚持“您不该干涉我的隐私，我又没乱联系人”的错误思想，实实在在是要不得的。

3、别的贱人的照片没有清理干净。在老婆下了最后通牒、自己发了誓之后，仍然没有清理干净别的贱人的照片。让老婆伤了心，我真真的悔恨交加。

第二， 我不该任性为了自己一点面子在您怀孕的时候跟您发脾气、还离家出走，真的是太小孩子气了。

第三， 让您生气、让您最近心情不好，基本都是我的错，而我却不知悔改，不知道反省自己以前的错误，反而变本加利装不要脸，每天都让老婆生气。

第四， 我态度不应该那么顽劣，您是我老婆，我应该对您小心呵护、应该关怀体谅。

第五， 我有时候认错态度很不诚恳。

第六， 我对您的关心太表面化了，只会说不会做，让您的心都凉了。

第七， 我不该对自己照顾得那么差劲，以前穿的衣服是在是太掉渣，穿的土的要死还在街上乱串，让路人看见给您丢人。

第八， 我不该言而无信，答应您的事情总是做不到，比如回去不给您做菜、经常丢三落四、出门不带纸巾等等。

错误是多方面的，总而言之言而总之我最大的错误就是不该跟老婆您闹别扭，经常让老婆在夜晚哭泣，我却还在打

呼磨牙、被窝里放屁，违反了一个中心“我心中最红最红的红太阳是老婆”，两个基本点“一.老婆永远是对的”“二.如果老婆错了，请参照第一基本点”，和四项基本原则“一，必须坚持家庭女权主义道路;第二，必须坚持老婆民主专政;第三，必须坚持老婆的领导;第四，必须坚持老婆的先进主义思想论述”。轻视了“老公心里只有老婆”的政策方针。您的话是“金口玉言”，您做的事，您的话，绝对不会有错。过去没有错，现在不会错，将来也不会错。如果您有错，那么一定是我看错了。同时为了表示我爱您尊重您理解您的决心，我决定进行灵魂深处的反省：

第一.换位思考。把发生在我身上的事件等等设想成发生在老婆身上，然后看看自己内心会有什么样的反应。

第二.改变我的行为。当连续遇到相同问题时，责任往往不在别人身上，而是这个人自身行为出现了问题。与其绞尽脑汁证明自己是对的，不如改变我的处事方式。

我知道我忽略了老婆容易受伤的心，这是除了原则性之外最严重的问题。但是我却冲您大吼大叫，还摆臭脸，不吭声，这严重伤了宝贝的心，老婆伤心难免心情不好或情绪不稳定，甚至影响到老婆对我的信任，这是团结和睦的最大隐患。而我则是这一隐患的罪魁祸首。这就是问题的严重所在，我错了，毫无争议!!

xxx：

我怀着沉重的心情写下这因没完成作业而写的“检讨书”，来说明我所犯的错误与我今后的打算。作业一事，表面看是一件微不足道的小事，事实上，这件事代表了一个人目前的状态与人生观。老师经常在班强调：《导学练》学到哪里，做到哪里，这点相信不会有人不烂记于心;可是我今天却没有完成《导学练》，没有做一件再普通不过的例行公事。

我不能说这是我粗心忘记(虽有一些成分)，我确实没有完成，我并不是没有时间完成它，我是在意识上不太想完成它，潜意识上不愿完成它。潜意识不能进行推理，也不同你的意识进行争论。潜意识就如同土壤，意识如同种子。消极的，破坏性的思想只能长出灾难的果实。潜意识不能区别好坏。如果你认为某事是真的，潜意识也接受它为真的，即使实际上可能是假的。说白了，我是不够自觉，没有把写《导学练》，提升自己的能力当作一件需要完成的事。我写完那些只需花20分钟左右的时间，可是我不能自觉地完成，也不能自觉地督促自己去完成。以后我会把完成《导学练》作为一项任务来完成，不只是因为这是作业，而是因为这有百利无一害，对提升自己有很大帮助。

这反映了我的自觉程度，很明显我并没有良好的习惯。良好的习惯不是人一生下来就有的，习惯仿佛一根绳，我们每天给它缠上一股新的绳索，要不了多久，它就会变得牢不可破。良好的习惯是持之以恒不断养成的，可是如果我做每件事，都和这次做《导学练》一样，没有老师的压力，就无法做到自觉，那么这样走下去，养成了这样的坏习惯，就会像疾病一样，使我受害终身。而那些会自觉完成作业的同学是我学习的榜样，是我的楷模;我会加强对自己的约束，做到自觉完成每一件事，养成良好的习惯，这对我的人生都有好处。

最后进行真正的检讨。无论理由如何，这次我错了，错误虽然不大，但是我看清了许多的道理，明白了许多知识。如果我这次隐藏了错误，我将永远无法看清这样做形成的一种“自然规律”——使我衰退，并可能使我堕落。我感谢老师帮我发现了这一规律。我求光照,洁净自己现而未隐的罪，并真心承认自己已知的一切过错，只有现在承认了错，力求自觉改正了错，才能使自己以后无错，使人生之路更为平坦。

xxx

：

尊敬的XX：

今天，上晚课语文的时候，我又一次的说话再一次的犯了错误。所以，我检讨。

事情的经过是这样的，今天语文，晚课讲的是卷子，上了半节课，我都没有说话，听到不知道谁说的话，反正挺招笑的，我就笑呵呵的说了两句。可不幸的是，被语文老师听到了，我坐在第一排，被她发现是件很容易的事情。她很生气，说我坐在第一座还说话，非得让我去走廊站着，在我的再三请求下，语文老师让我到前面站着，给了我一次机会。可我却没有珍惜，等到现在失去了这次机会时，才感到后悔莫及，那时，老师正在给我们丰富语文知识，讲诗圣、诗魔之类的。当讲到诗史的时候，我就冒出了两个字“吃屎”仅这两个字，又被语文老师听到了(虽然她没有听到我讲的内容是什么，但十分肯定的说我说了与课堂无关的话题)，非得让我出去站着，经过我的再三请求，语文老师还是坚持着她的原则，最后要去找班任柯老师，我也感到十分的后悔，老师给的机会不去珍惜，最后，闹的事情这么严重。

我上课说话，不是一次两次了，谢谢老师给我一次次改过的机会，可是，上课说话，已经在我上初中的时候就已经形成了，所以，改起来，也不是一天，两天就能够改掉的，但我可以肯定的是，现在上课的时候，我已经克制了自己不去说那些十分无聊的话，但是，虽然现在有时候还会说，不过我真的是已经用心去改掉他们了，所以，请老师再给我一些机会。慢慢地改掉它们，只有这样，在学习上，才能够更加用心的去学，学的自然也会扎实。

检讨人：xx

敬爱的老师：

今天，我怀着愧疚和懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以想您表示我上课玩手机这种不良行为的深刻认识以及我决定再也不上课玩手机的决心。

早在我进入校门的时候，我就坚定了好好学习，努力成才的决心，但是我却辜负了老师、家长以及同学的关心，我上课玩手机，但我真的不是存心上课玩手机的，我错过了老师为我们精心准备的无比生动的课，错过了一次老师呕心沥血给我们制作的知识大餐，这莫过于人生的一大损失。

逃课后，我满怀愧疚之情，在上课玩手机的时候也是惴惴不安的，一方面觉得对不住老师的谆谆教诲，另一方面还对不起父母，对不起我自己。这短时间我是在良心的一次次谴责中度过的，我觉得自己“上对不起天，下对不起地，中间对不起自己的良心”。

对不起，老师!这次我犯的是一个严重的原则性错误。错误已经发生，我却不知如何挽回，只好告诫自己要努力把握好今后的每一分钟，时时刻刻铭记老师的教导，努力学习，争创辉煌。最起码也要学会立足社会的知识，掌握自力更生的能力。

老师的反复教导犹言在耳，严肃认真的表情仍旧在眼前，我深深为之震撼，也深刻地认识到事已至此的严重性。

在我犯错的前几天里，我一直期待您来找我训话，惩罚我，借以减轻我心中的负罪感，我有好几次甚至想主动去找您坦诚错误，但我终究还是没有跨越那道线，我退缩了，我是真的不知该对您说什么，“我错了”这句话对您来说显得太苍白无力了，“我下次不敢了”。似乎也不能打动您的心，但这真的是我内心的真实写照，我也许并不太会用语言表达我想要表达的意思，但我真心希望您能从我的文字中读出深深地悔意和我要表达的痛改前非的决心。

如今大错已成，我深深懊悔不已，深刻检讨，认为我在思想中已深藏了致命的错误，思想觉悟也不高，更没有很好地掌控自己的情感反而让情感掌控了我，我的定力还是不够的坚定。

老师，虽然我的言语不多，写字也很潦草，但这正是我急切想表明我真的知道我错了的迫切心情。

我真的错了，我保证我再也不犯了!

我保证!

我会用以后学习生活中的事想您保证，您会看到一个全新的我!

我会用事实证明!

我会在以后的日子里想您保证，我一定再也不会犯样的错误了!

尊敬的领导：

你好!

现在我的心情是浮燥不安的，因为工作。为了弥补我工作中再出现同样的错误，我必须做一个自我检讨。

工作中存在的错误：

对待工作不够负责。

工作考虑不够周全。

工作不记事，总是忘记处理领导交待的工作。

上班时间玩游戏。

不听取他人意见，以自我为中心。

针对以上犯的错误，作以下弥补：

在以后工作中，一定要做到细致，检查再检查，细节决定成败，所以一定要认真对待每一件事。

在工作时，总是敷衍了事，没有把公司的事，拿来当成自家的事，总以完成为前提，并没有在乎它完成的质量与效果工作不认真为避免后有同样的事情发生，必须从始至终地认真完成工作，不能马虎，要有责任感。多集思广益。

工作考虑不周，以后在做任何一项工作或计划时，多听取他人的意见，策划详细，做到先思考再行动，先策划再沟通使工作无漏洞。

谨记需要办理的每一件事情，以记事本的方式把需要办理的每一件事详细记录，不管以后是工作还是生活，都不玩游戏，我发誓。

多听取他人朋友或同事的意见，取长补短。

检讨人：

今天，我怀着十二万分的愧疚以及十二万分的懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对这种不听从老师教诲行为的深痛恶绝及再也不在上课讲话的决心。早在刚考完月考的时候，您就已经三令五申，一再强调，全班同学，不得在上课讲话，交流是好事，但学生的首要任务是学习。其时，老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我深为震撼。现在也已经深刻认识到此事的严重性，于是我一再告诉自己要把此事当成头等大事来抓，不能辜负老师对我们的一片苦心。 今天XX(自己写)课时我上课说话。开始我并没意识到后果的严重性，但是在后来我才发现，我这样可能会影响学习。在深思熟虑后，我决定严格要求自己不再犯。也许我没有很好的文采，写不出深刻的“检讨”。但我内心的歉疚与悔过是什么也丈量不了的。我也会为我自己负责，做一个合格的学生!我也了解到，虽然不能弥补我的过失，但是我可以做得更好!既然老师给我写检查的机会就是相信我可以改过，我将用我的言行证明我是个守信用、守纪律的人!

据上，我决定有如下个人整改措施： 1、按照老师要求缴纳保质保量的检讨书一份!对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其可能造成的严重后果。 2、制定学习计划，决不上课讲话，努力将月考考好，以好成绩来弥补我的过错 3、不带头讲话，保证不再出现上述错误 请老师同学继续监督，帮助我改正!上课说话检讨书500字

很遗憾要交这份上自习课讲话的检讨书给您，通过写这份检讨书，我对于自己所犯的错误有了很深的认识。众所周知，上自习课也是学校安排的正规课堂学习，遵守自习课课堂纪律更是理所当然的，但愚笨的我却犯下了这样的错误，真的是不应该。

努力学习，遵守校纪校规，爱护同学是我们每一个学生应该做的，也是中华民族的优良传统美德，可是我作为当代的学生却没有好好的把它延续下来。而我却都在无知中遗失了组织纪律，不能很好理解自己在这所学校学习目的，现在的我真是觉得愧对老师，愧对家长，愧对培育我这么多年的学校啊。?今天上午的自习，我在课堂上吵闹，让老师您在百忙之中也还为我的不懂事儿忧心，在此我特为我的无知，特向您做最深刻的检讨。 首先，我认识到造成我自习讲话最直接的原因是我的自我约束力能力过差了，当把作业完成以后，就觉得没事可做;就找了几个同学******，说话声音于是便无所顾忌的加大了，慢慢的演变成了飞扬的课题气氛。当然，这不能成为自习课不遵守纪律的借口。先人曾说过我们只有认真反思错误，寻找错误的深刻根源，认清问题的本质，才能给集体和自己一个交待，从而得以进步。 我在此保证如果有一次重来该国的机会，我会尽我之所能克制自己，绝不犯同样的错误了

敬爱的老师：

对不起!

作为一名学生，我深知好好学习、遵守校纪校规是我们每个学生应该做的，也是中华民族的优良传统美德，可是我作为当代的学生却没有好好的把它传承下来。我在无知中违犯了纪律，不明白自己的学习目的。

错误的性质是严重的。我在学习的时候在关心别的没有好好听讲，并且打扰到其他的同学，其结果损害了多方利益。这种行为，即使是并没有给别人带来伤害，仍然是不对的，此举本身就是违背了做学生的原则。我只是顾着自己的玩乐和一时的想法，完全不理会老师的感受，这也是不对的，人是社会的人，大家不应该只是想着自己，我这么做，害的是我自己;我这样做，看似在现在玩的开心，实际上是在害自己。而且，一旦考试的时候我现在不会也是对老师的不尊重。所以，当老师对我进行批评教育的时候，也是为了让我深刻的认识到这点。

其二，我上课没听老师讲课也是一种对老师的工作不尊敬的表现。中国是一个礼仪之邦，自古就讲究尊师重道，这是一种传统的美德，过去我一直忽视了它。

其三，父母送我上学，此乃望子成龙之举，而我却上课说话，对于知识无动于衷，所以我同时也是对父母的一种间接性的不孝。

这次上课讲话违背了教育管理，影响了老师的工作正常运转，此乃不忠，一罪也。更让老师您为此事殚精竭虑，伤心失望，此乃不仁，二罪也。又有辜负了伟大父母对我殷切希望，浪费在校学习的时间，乃不孝，三罪也……在写此检讨之时，我深感自己的无知。

其实，那次说话是完全可以控制的，因为当时说实话，话题的是有关“二战”的军事知识，我们知道与课堂知识无关，但是我们依旧无法控制我们的情绪，我们在旁若无人中、在得意忘形中扰乱了课堂纪律。

这次说话的确影响到了其他同学，这点我反思深刻，想了很多，也许会引起的不只是影响同学上课听讲，而且还会让同学对我们产生厌恶之感，所以这次的教训我是有深刻思考的。

我接受老师的批评教导，愿意接受处理，对于这件事我还将进一步深入总结 ，深刻反省。

：

工厂丢失物料的检讨书

尊敬的胡组：

首先由于我的工作疏忽，没有把工作做好，出现了不应该的工作失误，“把一颗贵重的U1给弄丢了”在此我作出深刻的检讨！

当天由于从SMT胡组您那里拿来的U1，本想是拿到TESTTFB去换料的，可是因为碰上了星期六，TFB没有上班，我就把U1放到了厂牌里面了，可本人却没有看到厂牌下面烂了个洞，等再次确认物料的存在时，已经发现不见了。我在一切皆有可能掉的地方都找了个遍，最终还是已时已晚。因此，这件事的后果是严重的，影响是恶劣的，虽然是一件偶然的事件，但同时也是我对自己的放松，工作作风的涣散的必然结果。

本人知道这是自己的疏忽大意导致公司损失了一颗如此贵重的物料，通过这件事我感觉到了自己的不足，所以在此我向胡组及各领导检讨的同时也向你们表示发自内心的愧疚！

我谨向各位领导作出深刻的检讨，并保证：在这件事中我感到自己工作责任心仍旧非常的欠缺，懒散，粗心大意的缺点。后续本人保证不会再犯同样愚蠢的错误，对此，我会深刻反省，以后对工作会更加的谨慎。

最后我对此事再将进一步的总结，发生了这件事后，我知道无论怎样都不足以弥补自己的过失，因此我不请求领导的宽恕，无论领导怎样从严从重的处分，我都不会有任何的怨言。同时我请求再给我一次机会，使我可以通过自己的行动表示我的觉醒，以加倍努力的工作来为公司做出积极的贡献。谢谢！

检讨人：XXX

重要秘密文件丢失检讨书

尊敬的公司领导：

本人刚入职不久，本想借着领导交付我这样重要的一项工作好好地展现一下自己的工作能力，谁想我竟然在头一次接到领导工作安排的时候就出了这样一大篓子。为此，我”三天三夜也没合眼“、”羞愧万分泪洗脸，捂脸不见愧对天“。

这次遗失资料以后，我并没有像《我知女人心》当中的德华那样风姿潇洒得在客户面前”能说会道“，因为我也没这样的表演天赋。我深知自己遗失文件的行为，已经深深地引起了您的失望，同事的厌恶。是杀是剐，还是辞退我，悉听尊便，可是我真不是故意遗失的，其中不排除我遭人陷害的可能。但是我对天发誓，我真的不是公司竞争对手派来的间谍，我可以把我的档案一一地呈现给领导看的。

可是不管怎么说，我得为这次错误负责。如果领导愿意原谅我这一回，我一定将功赎罪，愿意为此不领两个月薪水，踏踏实实地为公司奉献与努力。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

经过我冷静的反思发现我有大小罪十余条,基与我所的犯错误,在这里我向你做出最深刻的检查,为了得到你的宽恕还有广大人民群众的宽恕,只要你能消消气,我接受任何(非分手形式)的处罚.这样才能让罪恶累累的我有一个改过自新的机会.以下是我所犯的罪恶行径及改正意见,请亲爱的阿林计银同志批阅:

1、以后我少上QQ，就算上QQ也不和异性朋友聊天。不能和其他女生太暧昧，就算是“亲爱的呆妹”“亲爱的老姐”等等等这样的话也不能说。为了一绝后患，你以后就不要再叫我去找那个谁，或者要我去追某某某了。

2、以后你在我身边时，我听电话、打电话都要在你身边，不能离开你半步去接、听电话，如果是女人(除了老妈)，我都要说我现在和女朋友在一起。免得你起疑心，怀疑我还有另一个女朋友。

3、以后少去酒吧喝酒，除非是特殊情况，也要向你汇报，得到你的批准后我才能去。喝酒时不能喝醉，要保持着清醒的状态回到家给你打电话说我回来了，让你有个安心。

4、以后每晚十点钟要给你电话，不论在哪里，在做任何事情(除非工作原因、电话没电、在抢险救灾、)，最基本的至少也要发条信息给你。

5、以后当我惹你生气时，我会站在你面前给你骂、给你打，我骂不还口，打不还手。当你心情不好时，我会静静的听你倾诉，在一旁开导你，安慰你。

6、你所做的事，所做的一切，都是对的。你说太阳是圆的就是圆的，太阳是方的就是方的。

我懊悔的心无法用语言来表达，只好写了这份检查给你，希望你能原谅我。我知道你是一个宽宏大量的人，你的这种美德是我当初决定和你在一起的重要因素之一，我相信你能原谅我的，是吗?

我错了，我已经恨不得让自己消失在这个地平线上，我真的悔不当初呀 !

如果你还愿意听我说句人话，我请求你能原谅我的无知和冲动，原谅我的累累罪行!

我希望你还能做回我的那个思情，我以后还是那个能陪你笑陪你哭的好劳工 。

真挚希望得到你的原谅!

校园打架现象呈上升趋势,给学生、家长、学校以及社会带来严重影响。本文是小编为大家整理的初中生打架检讨书范文，仅供参考。

学生打架检讨书范文篇一：

尊敬的班主任老师：

在此向你递交我的打架检讨书，因此此次打架事件，我给班级班风蒙受了巨大影响，给同学们树立了积极不好的示范。我真的觉得很对不起打架，此次打架，我遭到了学校政教处的记过处分，这让班主任老师的颜面扫地，让班主任在教学工作上造成了领导批评。我深切、愧疚地想您说一句：对不起，我错了，我悔不当初。

经过近三天的深刻反省与面壁思过。我学习到，在校学生应该努力搞好学习，要将全部精力都运用在学习上，不应该去想其他的事情。

最最不应该的是因为一些口角冲突就跟同学发生肢体冲突，这样的打架事件影响恶劣，打架也是那种极坏的学生才有的事情，不应该发生在我身上。

这次事件让我痛苦万分，因为当时的一时冲动，我犯下了如此严重的错误，我觉得最最对不起的就是班主任老师，还有我的父母。

老师，我决定今后再也不打架了。我会努力学习，力争改掉身上所有的坏习惯，成为一个好学生，我要不断反思自己，不断发现和纠正自己的缺点，下一阶段我会好好表现好的。希望老师与同学们监督我!

检讨人：

20xx年x月x日

学生打架检讨书范文篇二：

尊敬的政教处老师：

对不起，老师!关于我此次在学校打架。我已经犯下了一个原则性错误的严重问题。我知道学校明文规定学生不准参与打架斗殴，我的老师对我此次犯错也很生气。我也知道，一个学生不应该违反校规、违反纪律，应该认真学习，做自己分内的事。这是一个基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。

但我不连最基本的也做不到。现在，我犯了大错，我才深深地感到后悔。我指的我应该以此次违纪事件作为镜子，好好地检点自己的错误。批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督。我要知道羞耻并唤醒我的警觉。我才能够锐意进取，纠正我这样那样的错误，我也要通过这次事件，努力提高我的思想觉悟，强化责任意识。

我今后要遵守学校铁的纪律，严格遵守学校各种规章制度。我要将这次在学校打架伤人的错误，牢牢印刻在心。谨记错误，努力进取，一心一意地学好各项科学文化知识。

关于这次在学校打架，首先一点就是我个人自律能力欠缺。其次也是不爱护同学的表现，各位同学都是爹妈生的，每个人都一样都应该得到一份尊重。而我却因为同学一时激怒了我就对他大打出手，实在是不应该，也是年轻幼稚的表现。我为我因为幼稚而犯下的错误感动悔恨。我知道我应该认真检讨自己的行动：第一，我为自己的脾气，性格做深刻的思考和检讨。我脾气真的不好，我不冷静，应该通过这次事件我清楚地了解了自己的错误，今后一定积极改正。第二，我也应该团结有爱。我今后不但不和同学打架，而且还应该与同学有爱互助。同学在其他方面若是有困难，我在自己力所能及的范围内加以帮助。

检讨人：

20xx年x月x日

学生打架检讨书范文篇三：

尊敬的老师：

您好!

我是[xxxxx]班的[xxxxx]，我怀着十二万分的愧疚以及十二万分的懊悔写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对打架这种恶劣行为的深痛恶绝及打死也不再违纪的决心。回想起昨天发生的打架事情，让我后悔不已。作为一名在校学生，打架斗殴实属不对。作为一名学生，就要有学生的样子，团结，友爱，是我们的本分。冲动不能解决任何事情，相反会弄巧成拙，破坏同学关系，失去老师信任。我对我的做法感到愧疚。在此，写此书以示悔过。

事情经过是这样的, (说一大堆经过)虽然事情的起因并不在我，但我动手打人，就是我的错。不管发生什么事情，心平气和的讲明白，就可以大事化小，小事化了。多一事不如少一事。作为一个学生，学会学习，并要懂得怎样在生活中做一个强者。遇到事情，我应该冷静面对。打架可以解一时之气，但并不能解决事情。打架不仅给自己丢了颜面，也给学校，老师，班级及父母，脸上抹黑。学生要有学生的责任，在对方撞人后，我却与他发生了肢体冲撞，这种社会习气，没有素质的表现，实在是不应该在学校发生，我为我所的事情感到羞耻与抱歉。

在深刻的自我反思之后，我决定有如下个人整改措施：

1. 按照要求上交内容深刻的检讨书一份，对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其可能造成的严重后果。

2. 思想觉悟不高，对重要事项重视严重不足。就算是有认识，也没能在行动上真正实行起来。

3. 尊师重道，无论何时何地都不与老师顶嘴。

4. 提高认识，狠抓落实，大力开展批评与自我批评。

5 . 知羞就改，亡羊补牢，狠抓落实。我要以这次打架事件作为一面镜子时时检讨自己，批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督。我要通过这次事件，提高我的思想认识，强化责任措施。我有决心、有信心使我学得更好! 现在我已经认识到了自己的错误,打算今后改正坏毛病调整好心态,天天向上!

我向学校做出保证，今后再也不这么莽撞，不再惹事。有什么事情第一时间报告学校老师，不会在私下处理。希望这次老师能够给我宽大处理!

此致

检讨人：

20xx年x月x日

xx纪委监察局及尊敬的领导：

今天，我怀着万分的愧疚及懊悔写下这份检讨书，以表示我对个人思想麻木所造成的严重后果深痛恶绝及改正错误的决心。

这次犯错后，我对于我这次犯的错误感到很惭愧。通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，思想懒惰的必然结果。领导曾反复教导，有了矛盾，一定要通过合理合法的渠道解决，自己解决不了的可以找领导和同志们帮助。而语言上的迟缓，思想上的麻痹更是在我身上体现无疑。对于这件事情，所造成的严重后果如下：

1、给社会、单位及个人造成不良影响。本应按时处理工作事务的我未能按时出现，试问怎么不会让平时十分关心爱护每一个职工的领导担心。而这样的担心很可能让领导整天工作分心，造成更为严重的后果。

2、在同事们中间造成了不良的影响。

3、给家庭和亲人带来了思想负担，让家人和亲人感到大失所望。给自身增加了沉重的思想负担。

我要通过这次事件，提高我的思想认识，强化责任措施。我有决心、有信心改正!今后无论在什么场合，遇到什么样的人，我保证再也不会跟别人激化矛盾。一定要随时保持冷静而清醒的头脑，遇到谈不拢的人，一定要以理服人，如果真的无法沟通，自己就采取回避的办法，决不让可能损害他人或自己受伤害的事情再次发生在我身上。

不过，孰能无过?人总是会犯错误的,犯错误并不可怕，可怕的是没有勇气改正错误。当然我知道也不能以此作为借口，小孩没有管教好我负有不可推卸的责任发生此类事情绝对是失误。我们还是要尽量的避免这样的错误发生。痛定思痛，我只有认真反思，寻找错误后面的深刻根源，认清问题的本质，才能给单位和自己一个交待，从而得以进步。一个人的进步，不仅仅是工作效率上的提高，更重要的是思想、作风方面上的培养和锤炼。我忽视了这样一个重要的问题，为此而犯了方向性的错误。

如今，错既成，我深深懊悔不已。深刻检讨，挖掘深藏在本人思想认识上的致命错误有以下几点：

1、思想觉悟不高，对重要事项重视严重不足。在认识上还存在感性认识，没有上升到理性认识的高度。

2、平时生活上有家属照顾方面比较懒散，工作上平时有单位领导安排和同事们帮助，所以思想上麻痹大意，总有一种等靠的观念。如果不是因为懒散、粗心大意、记忆力水平低，不会发生此类事情。

3、平时和同事沟通不足，如果平时和同事沟通充足，向他们学习，那同样的事情就不会在我身上发生。

据此，我决定有如下个人整改措施：

1、对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其此事所能造成的严重后果。

2、今后要加强学习，特别是加强法律法规知识的学习，提高法律素养和法律素质，做一个学法、懂法、守法的合格公民

3、制定计划，认真克服生活懒散、粗心大意的缺点，以积极态度和饱满的热情投入工作，以好的工作成绩来弥补我的过失。

4、加强和同事们的沟通，细心向同事们学习。

总之，一定随时保持清醒的政治头脑、随时装有集体意识和纪律观念。这样错误才不会发生，才会让自己有大的提高。对于这一切我还将进一步深入总结，深刻反省，相信大家看到我的这个态度也可以知道我对这次的事件有很深刻的悔过态度，我这样如此的重视这次的事件，希望领导可以相信我的悔过之心。恳请领导同事相信我能够记取教训、改正错误，把今后的事情加倍努力干好。同时也真诚地希望领导能继续关心和支持我，并请监察局及领导和同事们对我的问题从轻处理，也请同事们继续给予我帮助、关心和照顾。

此致 敬礼!

检讨人：

日期：

尊敬的各位领导：

XXXX年XX月XX日，市局检查考评组对我XX派出所进行了XX工作综合考评，检查发现我所存在执法执勤、教育训练等台帐管理混乱的问题。XXXX年X月X日晚，副所长XXX将所里一辆**开回家中过夜，严重违反公车使用有关管理规定。几天来，我所支部人员经过认真反思，深刻自剖，对我所出现的这些问题，我们深感愧疚和不安，为领导工作添了乱，为分局抹了黑，更为重要的是我们感到对不起分局领导对我们的信任和期望，愧对领导的关心和厚爱。在此，我代表XX派出所党支部谨向各位领导做出深刻检讨，并将我们几天来的思想反思结果向领导汇报如下：

通过这次检查，让我所班子人员认识到我所在管理上存在严重的漏洞，也让我们意识到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己及部属要求不严，工作作风不实的必然结果。我们班子人员经过几天的反思，一致认为此次错误后果是严重的，影响是恶劣的。从制度上，暴露出我们制度还不严，不够健全不够完善，有些制度没有严格执行到位，有些监督检查也没有落实到位。作为主要领导，我们没有及时掌握每一位民警的工作任务落实情况，也没有对每一项具体工作进行督促检查，特别是对内勤各项工作检查不细，管理不够严，重视程度不够，导致出现工作被动情况;从管理上，暴露出我们平时对民警管理教育不够。我一定严肃检讨!

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

由于自己说的某些话，做得某些事，影响了你的心情，让你生气厌烦。

在此恳请你再给我一次机会，我保证会更努力的改变自己，做得更好。

1、如果对方需要帮忙，在自己能力范围内的，会尽快去帮，去做好。如果超出了自己能力范围，需延迟才能完成的，应该在答应之前告诉对方，避免双方不愉快的心情。

2、不能再随便怀疑对方，也不能用强硬的口气质问对方的一些事情。因为有些事可能事出有因，需用平和的语气去沟通。

3、在对方工作忙或者看书学习的时候，不能过分吵闹对方，因为你闲着的时候别人不一定闲着。如果有事留言就好。

以上三点，我会自觉遵守严格要求自己，如果还有需要补充的，过后添加。

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日