检检讨书分几个部分推荐20篇

在20xx年8月2日省上“小金库”专项治理检查组对清源镇政府财务检查过程中，发现镇政府将部分拆迁补偿费和拆迁户购房款合计4096721.9元以私人名义单独存放，形成帐外资金。其中：支付拆迁补偿费2544011.84元，支付拆迁户安置房工程款1146400元，购置车辆、服装等其他指出374348.62元。截止目前，单位在私人账户存款余额31961.44元。以上问题被查出后，作为党委书记，对此深感震惊、愧疚和不安，近日来本人认真反思，深刻自剖，现检讨如下：

一、对问题严重性的认识

我镇发生如此严重违反财经纪律的问题，作为清源镇党委书记，我负有全部领导责任，我将认真配合上级相关部门的调查，诚恳接受组织的一切处理意见，并就相关问题扎实进行整改。(面试网 www.mian4.net)

二、问题发生的根源

1、思想认识不到位。本人担任乡镇主要领导以来，尤其是调任清源镇党委书记以来，由于多方面的原因，对单位财务管理工作重要性的认识不足，没有意识到问题的严重性，在全国上下全面整顿治理“小金库”严重形势下，自己认为财务管理是行政职能，是政府镇长的份内工作，不便过问，没有在思想认识上引起高度重视，在单位财务管理和运行上抱有十分可怕的侥幸心理和自以为是的想法。同时，由于自身财务管理知识缺乏，存在不贪便无过的错误想法，对会计账务没有引起高度重视。

2、工作衔接不到位。作为单位一把手，对财务工作及管理人员疏于严格管理，亲自过问检查做的不到位。对人大、纪检等监督岗位的组织领导不到位，没有按照有关规定经常性组织督查、检查，监督职能没有充分发挥，致使政府财务基本在无监督的环境下运行;对财务主管及相关工作人员经常性督促、教育不够，致使管理人员财务知识匮乏，工作人员业务不精。

3、制度执行不到位。单位虽然制定了财务审批制度、资金管理制度等相关规章制度，但在执行上严重存在软肋，有时由于工作紧迫，在资金运行、管理上没有严格按章办事，存在管理脱节、程序错位、制度形如虚设的问题。

三、整改落实的措施

1、提高认识，全面认真抓好整改。对省督查组查出的问题，我们完全认可，我完全接受县委常委会的处理意见，对常委会做出的处理结果利用3天时间，逐项全面落实。同时，积极抽调相关人员组成工作组，利用3-5天时间，对全镇财务全面进行自查自纠，并随时接受相关部门检查、验收。

2、统一思想，认真做好当前各项工作。我将正视存在的问题，在全面抓好财经纪律整治的同时，认真组织抓好全镇当前各项中心工作。一方面，以此为契机，认真组织全镇广大干部，特别是领导干部，深入开展好财经纪律专项整治活动，通过各种形式开展财经知识教育、廉政教育和警示教育，提高干部综合素质。

另一方面，积极稳定干部情绪，引导干部客观看待问题，振奋精神，把心思和精力集中到当前各项工作上来，以更高要求和标准，抓好各项工作落实。

3、强化措施，积极建立健全财经管理的长效机制。通过上级部门检查，及时发现问题，对我来说是一次发现自身问题和不足以及改正错误的机会，我将认真吸取精要教训，认真弥补自己的过错。并以此为契机，创新思路，强化措施，完善各项规章制度，积极探索建立健全财经管理的长效工作机制，以努力争创一流工作业绩来回报组织对我的培养和信任。

总之，我的行为已经给清源镇带来了不好的影响，我的心情非常沉重和羞愧。相信组织给我一次机会，使我可以通过自己的行动来表示自己的觉醒，在今后的工作中，我会更加严格要求自己，加强学习，认真履行岗位职责，以加倍努力的工作来证明自己，恳请组织考验。

检讨人：

日期：

在新学期第一周，我整个人处于开学的兴奋状态，与同学许久未见，在自修课就聊一些琐碎的事情。我这种行为还在学校同学间造成了及其坏的影响，破坏了学校的形象。同学之间本应该互相学习，互相促进，纪律良好，而我这种表现，给同学们带了一个坏头，不利于学校的学风建设。同时，也对学校形象造成了一定损害，我们应该去维护而不是去破坏它!对于这件事情，所造成的严重后果我做了深刻的反思：

1、在同学们中间造成了不良的影响，由于我在上课的时候讲闲话，有可能影响班级纪律性，让其他同学也讲话，都没有好好听课，这实际上也是对别的同学的父母的不负责。

2、影响个人综合水平的提高，使自身在本能提高的条件下为能提高。如今错已铸成，我深感懊悔，深刻检讨自己的错误。

3、思想觉悟不高，对错误的认识不足，试想如果当时我就认识到此事的严重性，错误就不可能发生。所有的问题都归咎于我还为能达到一个现代中学生应具有的认识问题水平，为能对老师的辛勤劳作作出回报，我越来越清晰的感觉到自己所犯的错误的严重性，为此，我一定会在以后的几年里更严格地要求自己，在认真完成作业，在上课的时候绝对不讲闲话地同时，使自己的言行都与一个现代中学生相符合。

由于我的违法犯罪行为，给党的形象抹黑，给xx区的经济社会发展带来严重影响。我对不起党，对不起关心培养我的领导，对不起人民，对不起人民选出来的人民代表，是你们选举我当区长，而我却没能为人民用好权;我对不起曾经和我一起工作战斗过的同志，由于我没能履行职责，加强廉政建设方面的督查，可能还会有其他一些同志，犯有程度不同的问题。

我特别对不起我的妻儿，妻子对我的希望就是平平安安，等退下来后，过普通人的日子。儿子很优秀，在美国工作，元旦前夕回来过新年，本该是一家人共享天伦之乐的时刻，而我却亲手毁了这一切。我给我的家庭带来了巨大的、难以弥补的伤害。

痛定思痛，我想对广大党员干部说说我的心里话。

一是要切实把党风廉政建设摆上重要位置，加强领导，真抓实抓;二是一把手一定要率先垂范，时时处处以清正廉洁的形象带领整个班子;三是要切实加强民主集中制，不能搞形式上的民主集中制，实质上的家长制;四是一个地区、一个部门，发现问题要及时查处，这样就不会导致腐败程度这么深，范围这么广，惩治时的代价这么大。

我还想对xx区的党员干部说几句心里话。任何事物都是量变到质变的过程。由于自己没能采取正确的措施，错失了一次极好的机会。类似错误，在党员干部中还一定范围一定程度上存在，希望犯有这些错误的同志，能尽快放下包袱，打消顾虑，走进组织大门，不能再错失良机了。

最后，我还要感谢谈话小组的成员，我是一个犯有严重经济问题接受审查的人，在谈话期间，你们并没有从人格上贬低我，而是给予充分的尊重，谈话是严肃的，但过程应该说也是轻松的。那朴素的风格，和善的面容，真诚的态度令我感动，是你们令我悬崖勒马，拯救了我，我深深感谢你们!

检讨人：xxx

20xx年xx月xx日

家长检讨书一：

接到孩子本学期迟到三次的通知，让我很吃惊。“***迟到三次，共迟到6分钟”简单的一句话，说明了很多问题。首先，说明班级的管理很严格，迟到已经是很严重的过错。第二，说明了班级管理严谨细致，三次六分钟的记录足以说明问题。第三，迟到通知这种方式将会让老师——学生——家长三者之间得到充分的沟通，对错误和过错有一致的认识。

说到这里，作为学生家长既脸红又高兴。脸红的是，在我们成人的世界里，在我们的工作单位，管理方面也达不到如此严格，如此细致。高兴的是，我们的孩子处在一个管理严格有效的团队里。

古人云，勿以善小而不为，勿以恶小而为之。试想，一个五十人的团队，一个人耽误6分钟，每个人都拖拖拉拉，五十人将浪费300分钟，这样的团队将是怎样的一个团队?

鉴于此，作为家长我们要积极支持班级管理，不讲任何理由，不找任何借口。在未来的日子里和老师们一起杜绝迟到，杜绝一切不利于我们共同目标的坏毛病，把孩子培养成学习好、严谨、自律、具有团队精神的未来人才。

家长检讨书二：

汪老师：

你好

作为家长，首先对老师为孩子们费尽心机的辛苦表示深切的感谢。孩子在成长中出了一些问题，我们做家长的是有责任的。

请允许我以家长的视角分析一下孩子性格缺陷的形成过程和一些相关因素，以利于老师在对孩子的调教过程中更加心里有数并且省时省力。

这家伙自九三年出生到三岁期间，我这个做父亲的，因为自己从小是教师养大的，受的是说服教育，不太挨打，所以自身的性格很脆弱，受不得挫折，经不起打击，由于不想孩子走这样的老路，所以就打孩子，那三年，孩子挨打算起来平均一天不会少于一次。到孩子三岁的时候，我发觉这样的方法对孩子伤害大了，一是影响了智力发展，二是性格也形成了逆来顺受。

城关幼儿园的邓军和陈夕春老师，都是非常优秀的心理咨询师，他们对孩子成长中意志品质和智力发展的研究都非常深，在他们的帮助下，我很少打孩子了，现在又过去了十多年，回想起邓老师和陈老师对孩子成长中所给我们的恩德，就知道我们一家人都会终生感佩的。

孩子上小学，小学的班主任是一个工作认真负责到近于苛刻的人，但由于孩子一到三岁时受过我这当父亲的荼毒，所以小学六年，孩子的成绩虽然呈上升趋势，但总难进班里的前十，所以我这个不称职的父亲在自责中度过了六年，一直羞于见孩子的小学老师。所幸的是这六年中一直牢记幼儿园的邓军老师和陈夕春老师的辅导，所以孩子终于能顺利的进入璧山正则中学，有幸的遇到了他们的初中班主任曾红英老师。

初中三年，孩子的成长走上了健康的轨道，在曾老师的调教下，孩子越来越懂事，但孩子毕竞是孩子，随着自身的成长，慢慢开始产生多多少少的骄傲情绪，对待学习的努力程度有所下降，这成了个很不好解决的事情。在艰难的思考中，我甚至产生了非常荒唐的想法。因为觉得孩子对待学习不发狠，也许是少受委屈的缘故，如果叫社会上的小混混去打他一顿，让他受些委屈，激发他发狠发奋的心态，但这个荒唐的想法，被曾老师阻止了。曾老师为孩子的成长费尽心机，我们一家人也不会忘记曾老师的恩德的。

我自己是一个小学音乐老师，平时就很注意对孩子们意志品质的激发和培养，现在自己的孩子在意志品质方面存在的缺点，虽然深知，但孩子大了，他的生活圈子已经到了高中，所以我在很大程度上都寄希望于孩子的高中老师和同学对孩子意志品质形成方面的良性刺激。

这次发生的扣分事件，事情很小，但被孩子搞得有些大了，初中三年好不容易培养起来的上进心，似乎就要破罐子般的摔去，这充分暴露了孩子的脆弱。作为家长，我们完全支持老师对孩子所采取的教育手段，我们非常希望孩子在学校不但能学到知识，还能得到情绪方面的有益的训练，孩子能更加体谅人，更加善解人意，学会检讨自己，学会控制和调节自己的情绪，在任何情况下都不失去上进的信心，也只有这样，才算是长大了，成了一个坚强的人，能够铁肩担道义的大写的男人，男子汉。

汪老师，我只是一个小学音乐老师，目前羞于见老师，相信汪老师能够理解是因为囊中羞涩，呵呵，湖南新化的教师本月十八日还在罢课哩。我们也非常理解汪老师所承受的压力，希望在娃娃毕业之前，能有绩效工资到手，好大大方方的来拜访孩子的各科老师们，向你们道一声辛苦了，表示我们家长的深切谢意。

此致

家长检讨书三：

作为学生家长，我们不算失败，可以说不成功。

按照孩子的小学成绩，完全可以考入一个市重点高中，其结果考入县重点高中。仅此成绩，只要努力，包括家长和孩子共同努力，可以使孩子的学习成绩日渐上升。然而，孩子放松了学习，我们更放松了监管，以至于孩子的学习一落再落，再也没有打破中考名次的记录。

教训有三：一是必须拥有做父母的强烈责任心。父母是孩子的第一任老师，父母要做到以身作则，对孩子的潜移默化式的教育首要且必要，家庭要给孩子一个浓厚的学习氛围，一切影响学习的因素必须戒除，良好的学习环境会让孩子意识终身受益，否则，也许会影响孩子一生习惯。二是管理方法要恰当。中学阶段是孩子生理判逆时期，好多时候听不进去家长的意见和建议，自尊心、敏感性、自信心相当强，往往自以为是，视父母的管理为监督，如果教育孩子方式方法不妥，孩子会视父母为敌，认为他得不到父母的爱，其后果只能是雪上加霜，不仅影响父(母)子感情，而且导致削弱孩子的学习兴趣。三是要正确读懂孩子。也就是要了解孩子的优劣势，做到鼓励长处而不回避缺陷，发挥特长而不能影响学习，批评错误但不能全盘否认，保持良好的学习成绩而不压抑孩子的兴趣，这是做父母必须把握好的一点。

由于儿子为人善良忠厚，思维发散，能言会道，认识问题有深度，注重朋友感情，我们曾以此为荣，过于信任儿子的能力和水平，而一度放松他的文化课程学习，父母双方也未达成一致意见，无形之中给孩子制造一个学习漏洞，久而久之，养成一个习惯成自然的学习模式，是任其发展的模式，结果只能是兴趣无果，成绩无效，而去埋怨孩子没有自控力，换言之，身为家长能有多强的自制力，而去要求未成年孩子去自己管理自己呢?这不是对孩子的苛刻吗?

鉴于孩子的本身素质，身为父亲是这样反省的：用爱心感化他，用信心激染他，用耐心督促他，用雄心激励他!我们在孩子的教育问题上，只有不成功的教训，但是在高考百天前能认清问题的实质，为时不晚，相信我们的孩子是优秀的!

尊敬的各位领导：

首先由于我的工作不认真的原因，没有把工作做好出现了不应该的工作失误在此我做出深刻检讨!

当天由于我工作的马虎大意，忘记了本应该在学习的时候就应该完成的信息反馈!事后经领导检查后才发现犯了过错但为时已晚!

经过领导的批评后我发现，造成没完成作业的主要原因，主要是我责任心不强。通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，工作作风涣散的必然结果。自己身为组长，应该严以律已，对自己严格要求!增强自身的职业态度，避免在工作上的随意性。然而自己却不能好好的约束自己，我对自己的工作没有足够的责任心，也没有把自己的工作更加做好，更加走上新台阶的思想动力。在自己的工作态度中，仍就存在得过且过，混日子的应付想法。现在，我深深感到，这是一个非常不好的想法，如果继续放任自己继续放纵和发展，那么，后果是极其严重的，甚至都无法想象会发生怎样的工作失误。因此，通过这件事，我感觉到自己的不足，所以，在此，我在向领导做出检讨的同时，也向你们表示发自内心的感谢。

检讨人：

敬爱的领导

平常在工作中总是感觉自我良好，天真的以为事情说一遍就能讲通，从而导致今天检查工作中让您吃惊和愤怒，对此，我深感自责和不安，这是由于我个人工作失职所造成的，不可推卸。

出现这样的问题我觉得还是有必要向您说清楚一下，这些问题我也是天天强调，也花了很多时间去检查，开始效果还是良好的，只是没想到我稍微注意到别的事情上，一放松，就出现如此多的问题，实在是措手不及和防不胜防。此时此刻，我在深刻反思自己，主要的责任和原因都在我，我想，只有在今后的工作中，更加坚定的，持之以恒的贯彻落实公司的制度和政策才能真正的走向强大!

在接下来的工作中，还请领导多加督促和提点，有不适之处请不吝赐教，我会更加努力，更加认真去完成分内外的工作，争取做到最好!

检讨人：

检讨日期：

敬爱的老师：

您好!由于这次考试成绩不理想，我的心里万分愧疚。我有负您一直以来对我的深切教诲和深深期盼，但是我已经努力了。这个成绩并不是我想要的结果，因为我也曾在考前做过认真的复习和准备。也许是我平时真的练习和认真上有些不够的话，我以后会更加努力的去弥补过去的不足。我知道上课的时候我有时候没有认真的抄笔记，课后也没有和同学去交流，但是我以后会把这些都做好，不会再考出这样的成绩来让您担心。

我知道您对我的关心和关注，所以，我不会让您再对我担心和失望。虽然我这次考试失败了，但是我并不会放弃以后等待您表扬的机会，我会继续努力，因为我想看到您对我赞赏的眼光。老师，对于这场考试，我知道说对不起是没用的。所以，希望您给我一次证明的机会，证明我可以考出更好的成绩。我明白您也会一直支持我的。在此说声谢谢您。老师，请您原谅我这次的失误，也希望您下次看到我的试卷给我一个欣慰的眼光。谢谢。

您的好学生：xxx

什么是论点呢?论点是作者对所论述问题的见解和主张，是议论文的灵魂。确立论点是写好议论文的前提。议论文的论点必须做到鲜明、正确。鲜明，就是要明确地表示肯定什么，否定什么，赞成什么，反对什么。对某件事情、某种现象发表议论，必须态度明朗，观点明确，不能含含糊糊，模棱两可。正确，是指观点要符合客观实际、合乎情理，要经得起实践的检验。“鲜明”与“正确”，是对初学写议论文者的基本要求。如果再要求高一点，论点还应当有新意，有深意，有现实意义。所谓新意，是说要有自己的看法，不要总是重复别人的观点;所谓深意，就是不能只抓表面现象、就事论事，而要揭示事物的本质和规律;所谓现实意义，就是议论要有针对性，要对现实生活中人们普遍关心的、需要解决的问题提出自己的看法。

敬爱的X老师：

我怀着十二万分的愧疚以及十二万分的懊悔向你们写下这份检讨书，我为自己的行为感到了深深地愧疚和不安，在此，我向老师做出深刻检讨：

通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对考试纪律不重视的必然结果。自己身为学生，应该严以律已，对自己严格要求!然而自己却不能正确地帮助同学，给其他同学带来了恶劣的影响;虽然自己并非有意。可是，由于自己的错误，给学校风气带来了严重的不良影响，后果不堪设想~~~这也说明，我对自己的学习生活没有足够的自律心，也没有把学校要求切实做到，没有真正理解学校和老师良苦用心。在自己的思想中，没有对“义气”有真正的理解。现在，我深深感到，这是一个非常危险的倾向，也是一个极其重要的苗头。

因此，这次发生的事使我不仅感到是自己的耻辱，更为重要的是我感到对不起老师对我的信任，愧对老师的关心。

同时，要诚心的谢谢老师，如果不是老师及时发现，并要求自己深刻反省，而帮助其他同学继续放纵和发展，那么，后果是极其严重的。因此，通过这件事，在深感痛心的同时，我也感到了幸运，感到了自己觉醒的及时，这在我今后的人生成长道路上，无疑是一次关键的转折。所以，在此，我在向老师做出检讨的同时，也向您表示发自内心的感谢。

发生这件事后，希望自己的错误，给其他敲响同学警钟。同时，我请求老师再给我一次机会，在以后的学习生活中，我会通过自己的行动来表示自己的觉醒，做一个严于律己的好学生，请老师相信我!

尊敬的老师：

在此，我十分抱歉地向你递交我这份检讨，因为一次检讨意味着我犯了一次重大过错。此次，我因为上课玩弄手机、不好好听课，给班级上课秩序造成了比较严重的影响。您观察到我的不良行为，及时加以制止，并且没收我的手机作为处罚。

如今，经过面壁思过与深刻反省。我深深地觉悟到自己所犯错误的严重性：第一，我身为一名在校学生，学习无疑是自己的本职工作，也是必须履行的义务。第二，在大学期间的教育对于每个人来说都是十分珍贵的，而我却不思进取，甚至严重到在上课期间玩手机、不专心听课。这更是犯了十分严重的错误，这是对于教育资源的浪费。第三，身为一名学生，我犯这样的错误，无疑是大大辜负了我父母对我的殷切期望。这对于我年迈的父母来说，是一个很大的打击。我的父母辛苦赚钱，送我们进入大学深造，为的就是我们能够努力学习，找到一份好的工作，将来能够生活得更好。而为的使我们能够在各方面活动好的条件，父母为我们购得手机。而我却恰恰不用功读书，不能全身心的投入学习，反倒是上课玩手机。如今我做了错事，辜负了我的父母，我觉得很惭愧，想起父母的辛劳，不由地流泪。再看我的错误，我也是很对不起辛勤教育我的老师的。老师为我们辛勤工作，为我们努力备课，而我却辜负老师的辛劳，上课不好好听讲是对老师的不尊重。

此次检讨过后，我也会跟老师做当面正式道歉的。最后我写一下对今后保证：我保证今后上课期间不做任何违纪行为了，上课期间手机一定坚决关机或调为振动。今后认真听每一节课，在校当一名好学生，在家做一个孝顺的儿子，将来为社会做出自己的一份贡献。

检讨人：xxx

20xx年x月x日

尊敬的各位领导：

今天，我怀着万分愧疚与懊悔之心写下这份检查，来表达自

己对于20xx年x月xx日上午10点45分，上班时间听音乐这一行为的深刻反思，同时表达我认识错误、改正错误的决心。

经过一天一夜的深刻反省，我内心深刻的认识到了这件事情

的严重性与错误性。

一是我的行为严重脱离了机关干部应有的行为准则，没有深

刻的领会到习总书记“八项规定”的精神内涵;忽视了对自己的严格要求，对于领导三番五次强调的工作纪律与单位规章制度没有做到铭记于心、践行与外。

二是作为一名处于见习期内的年轻干部，我的行为不仅是对

自己的不负责任，更是对整个管委会的不负责任;这一事件，不仅影响了自己的人生轨迹，而且，给管委会形象带来了极为负面的影响。

三是作为一名综合办公室的工作人员，我本来应该时时、处

处、事事严格要求自己，为各科室的同志们做好表率，但是，这一事件的发生，给同志们开了一种不好的先例，不利于管委会的作风建设。

于此同时，我也认识到了这件事情的发生虽然充满了一定的

偶然性，但也是长期以来我对自己的放松要求、工作作风涣散的必然结果。现在，我深刻的认识到，这是一个非常危险的倾向，如果放任自己，继续发展，那么，后果是及其严重的，甚至无法想象。我对我自己犯下的这个严重错误感到痛心疾首、无比悔恨与遗憾。同时，我的心中也有一丝丝的庆幸，我的错误被及时的发现并消灭，及时的挽回了我迈向犯错的脚步，阻止了我向错误更深处蔓延。在以后的工作中，我一定会以这次事件为教训，警钟长鸣，时时不忘提醒自己，严格遵守单位的各项规章制度，时时牢记作为一个机关干部应有要求，全面提升自己的思想道德素质与职业道德素养，勤勤恳恳，做好自己的本职工作。在此，我做出如下保证：

一是在以后的工作中，以这件事情作为一面镜子，时时引以

为鉴，绝对不再犯同样的错误。

二是继续深入学习市、区两级政府及管委会内部的各项规章

制度，深入领会习近平总书记提出的“八项规定”的精神核心与深刻内涵。提高自己的理论水平与知错、辨错能力。

三是不断加强自己的自律意识，强化集体荣誉感，强化自己

的岗位意识、纪律意识与责任意识，不再做让组织蒙羞、让领导失望、让同志们痛心、让自己悔恨的事情。

四是要“知耻而后勇”，要亡羊补牢，化羞愤为动力。努力做

好自己的本职工作，提升自己的业务能力，让自己尽快的成长为一名“政治觉悟高、思想素质高、业务能力强、为人处事诚”的机关干部。

请各位领导接受我的检查，并进行监督。

检查人：某某某

尊敬的老师：

对于我6月17号晚上晚归的不良行为我深感懊悔。

早在开学之际，老师就再三强调不能违反各种学校的条例，各种规章制度，可是我去在17号晚上晚归了，因为在外面过生日，玩过头，导致错过了回宿舍的时间。还记得老师曾经说过凡事有个度，玩可以但是不可以超过那个度，事后我认识到自己作为一个大学生应该为自己的所作所为负责，在此我对老师说声对不起，也对全班同学说声对不起。因为我的原因令班级的名义受损。在这里我保证不再犯，不再晚归，遵守宿舍条例。对于自己观念上的错误。以为晚归不是很严重，但是现在知道错了。我会树立好正确的观念。晚归不仅害人害己。影响到宿友，没有尊重他人，在此。我再一次的为自己的不良行为向老师道歉。

赖欢

怀着愧疚的心情，写下这份检查。以向您表示我的决心和悔改之意，只希望父母(老师)能够给我一个改正错误的机会。以前我没有意识到自己的散漫和无知，上课总是不认真听讲，导致我考试没考好。

我认为，这次考试考不好还有两个大的原因：

一是学习不用功。这么说有些笼统，其实它能分为很多小原因。早读有一半的时间用来犯困，另一半时间中的效率也不高，有时还哼首歌什么的(由此决定以后少听歌)。上课时，特别是数学和英语，一有听不懂的情况就犯困，越困越听不懂。然后，我不清楚何时有了个大毛病——发呆。这的确浪费了很多时间。只要一闲下来就发呆。所以，以后打算把日程排满，充实自己，改掉这个自杀式的烂毛病。还有，我有个不爱写作业的毛病。特别是上了高中后作业多了起来。以后要勤快些。其实这也是学习态度的问题。

二是学习态度不端正。我常把自己定位为"厌恶学习的孩子"。其实这是消极的心理暗示。事实上我已经开始对许多的科目产生兴趣了。心理暗示也是蛮重要的。

现在我十分重视，并从内心上谴责自己，反省自己。要从自己身上找错误，查不足，深刻的反醒。我清楚，错了并不重要，重要的是在自己做错事的时候，能够正确的认识到自己的错误，并且清楚如何改过自身，所以我在以后的日子里，会格外的严格要求自己。现在我对自己的学习也有了新的要求。

因为我发现我竟然有一点"为了现在玩的痛快不管以后"的征兆。所以，现在我要把这些所有不好的征兆都扼杀在摇篮里。还有一点，就是要减少吃东西的时间。每天都要花半个小时左右的时间吃零食。而其他人都用这半小时学习了。人总是不见棺材不落泪的(考试没考好，棺材都出来了😱)。我已经看到了事态的严重性，不会再下滑了。

只要我们都有很好的约束能力、自主学习能力，在没有任何借口，任何理由能为讲话开脱!我们只有认认真真思考人生有那么多事要做，那么多的担子要挑，就没有理由考试不考好了.我一定不会在同一地方摔倒。做事情，要有始有终，学习更是一样，不能够半途而废。

我现在已经深刻的认识到了自己的错误，找到了自己身上存在的不足。所以，我要感谢老师让我写了这份检查，让我更加深刻的认识到自己的错误，希望老师能够再给我一次机会，我一定会好好努力，不再让老师及家长失望。请父母和老师看我的实际行动吧，我会努力学习的。

尊敬的老师：

打架斗殴是影响极坏的恶性事件，校规中有明确规定学生在校期间，不得与其他人打架斗殴。由于我的一时冲动，造成了这样不良的后果，我感到深深的自责。事后，我进行了深刻的反省：

首先，就个人看来，与人和睦相处是每个学生都应遵道德规范，尽量不与他人发生争执，一直是学生自入学起就经常被家长告诫的处事准则，但是我恰恰违反了这一点。这样一来，不但有损自己学生的形象，更使得和他人的相处出现障碍，相互伤害了对方身心的同时，对于以后我的学习、工作和生活造成不良影响。

其次，对学校来说，校纪校规中规定的“不准打架斗殴”的规章制度并不是对学生的束缚，而是对学生的保护。而我的这种行为，在触犯了校纪校规的同时，脱离了学校的保护，更是给学校的光辉形象抹了黑。一个学生不管在哪里，都不仅仅是自己，也同时代表了学校的形象，而我不仅损害的自己学生的形象，更学校的整体形象，我感到万分歉疚。

最后，在社会而言，打架斗殴是一种违法乱纪的行为，情节严重的更会被追究刑事责任，处以严厉的刑罚。我这次的违纪，虽然情节没有严重到触动法律，但是对我而言也是一次警告，让我意识到错无大小，防微杜渐的道理，更令我下定决心痛改前非，告诫自己再也不犯类似错误。

在此，我想再一次表达我深深的悔恨和歉意。后悔自己当时一时冲动酿成大错，同时也抱歉自己造成的不良影响。我向老师保证，我将痛定思痛，努力改正自己冲动好斗的不良习性，同时也会在以后的学习生活中更加严格的要求自己，与人和睦相处，不争一时意气，同时做好学生的本分，更加努力的学习。请??领导称谓给我一次机会，我将用实际行动应正我的承诺。

检讨人：xxx

20xx年xx月xx日

尊敬的领导：

×月×日上班期间，本人没有认真准时上班，而是迟到了。几天来，本人认真反思，深刻剖析，为自己的行为感到了深深地愧疚和不安。在此，我谨向领导作出深刻检讨，并将几天来的思想反思结果向领导汇报如下：

人社局是一个为群众落实社会保障政策的窗口部门，群众来办事的比较多，一旦发现工作人员有迟到的情况，并向网络媒体举报曝光，不仅损坏了公务人员在群众中的良好形象，而且降低了社保局的公众信任感，后果不堪设想。从网上搜索一下，这样的反面教材举不胜举。经反思，本人没有从思想深处高度警醒，没有从维护集体荣誉、为集体争光的角度看待上班玩游戏的问题，总以为这是小节、无关大局，是个人问题、涉及不到集体问题。这是错误之一。

局领导、中心主任多次通过办公会、干部大会、个别提醒等方式，再三强调工作纪律，明确提出了上班期间不准迟到的要求。然而本人总认为工作任务第一，只要能完成好工作任务，其它都没有关系，领导也不会太怪罪的。经反思，本人没有把遵守纪律中的“纪律”看作是全方位的纪律，而是只求其一、不求其二;没有充分认识到纪律的重要性，犯了自由主义的错误;没有把领导的指示、纪律的要求当作刚性标准，没有树立“纪律高于一切”的观念。这是错误之二。

领导把我放在事业单位出纳的重要岗位上，我没有珍惜岗位荣誉、有辱岗位职责、愧对领导信任和关心，也对其他同事产生了消极影响。没有把有限的工作时间花在工作上，即使有空余时间，也应用在钻研业务知识、提高会计专业技能上，说明心智还不够成熟，工作责任心、进取心还不够强。这是错误之三。

廖廖几笔，难表我悔恨痛惜之情。今后，我一定在上班期间不迟到，认真恪守各项工作纪律，对领导提出的各项工作要求、上班制度牢记在心、落实于行。抓紧工作时间，高标准完成领导交给的各项任务，高质量做好会计业务工作，同时坚持每天抽出一定时间学习与业务相关的知识，积极参加专业技术等级考试，学习政治经济知识以及做人做事准则，努力提高完善自身。积极争当行业标兵、岗位表率，弥补我的错误，创造新的业绩，为集体争作贡献、争光添彩。

请领导看我的实际行动吧。

尊敬的李老师：

您好!我是10级中文系汉语言文学一班的学生李瑞灵。4月2日早上旷课四节，私自离校，前往郑州去找男朋友。之后接到辅导员李老师的电话，受到了教育，也知道的一意孤行造成了多么严重的后果。

这次犯错误，自己想了很多东西，反省了很多的事情，自己也很懊悔，很气自己去触犯学校的铁律，也深刻认识到自己所犯错误的严重性，对自己所犯的错误感到了羞愧。

学校一开学，辅导员您就三令五申，一再强调校规校纪，提醒学生不要违反校规，可我却没有把学校和老师的话放在心上，没有重视老师说的话，没有重视学校颁布的重要事项，当成了耳旁风，这些都是不应该的，也是对老师的不尊重。我应该把老师的话紧记在心，把学校颁布的校规校纪紧记在心。

事后，我冷静的想了很久，我这次犯的错误不仅给自己带来了麻烦，耽误自己的学习，而且我这种行为给学校也造成了极其坏的影响，破坏了学校的管理制度。在同学们中间也造成了不良影响。由于我一个人的犯错误，才可能造成别的同学的效仿，影响班级纪律性，年纪纪律性，对学校的纪律也是一种破坏，而且给对自己抱有很大期望的老师、家长也是一种伤害，也是对别的同学的父母的不负责任。

每一个学校都希望自己的学生做到品学兼优，全面发展，树立良好形象，也使我们的学校有一个良好形象。每一个同学也都希望学校给自己一个良好的学习环境来学习、生活。包括我自己也希望可以有一个良好的学习环境，但是一个良好的学习环境靠的是大家来共同维护建立起来的，而我自己却犯了错误，破坏了学校的良好环境，是很不应该的。若每一个同学都犯这样的错误，那么是不会有良好的学习坏境形成，对违反校规的学生给予惩罚也是应该的。

这几天我想了很多，也意识到自己犯了很严重的错误，我应该为自己犯的错付出代价，我也心甘情愿承担不起的责任。我真诚地接受批评，并愿意接受学校的处理。

对不起，老师!我犯的是一个原则性问题。我知道，老师对于我犯校规也非常生气。我是一名学生，却没有好好学习。我会以这次违纪事件作为一面镜子时时检讨自己，批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督。我要知羞为警醒，知羞而奋进，亡羊补牢，话羞辱为动力，努力学习。我也要通过这次事件提高我的思想认识，强化责任措施。自己还是很想好好学习的，学习对我来说是最重要的，对今后的生存、就业都是很重要的。我现在很年轻，还有去拼搏的能力。我还想再拼一次，再努力一次，希望老师给予我一个做好学生的机会，我会好好改过的，认认真真的去学习。

犯了这样的错误，对于家长也是一种巨大的打击，家长亲亲苦苦挣钱，让我们可以生活的比被人优越些，好一些，让我们可以全身心的投入到学习中去。但是，我犯的错误却违背家长的心愿，也是对家长心血的否定。我对此很惭愧。

相信老师看到我这个态度也可以知道我对这次事件有很深刻的悔过态度，相信我的悔过之心，我的行为不是向老师的权威进行挑战，而是自己的一时失足，希望老师可以原谅我的错误，我也会向你保证此事不会再有第二次发生。对于这一切我还将进一步深入总结，深刻反省，恳请老师相信我能过吸取教训、改正错误，把今后的事情加倍努力办好。同时也真诚地希望老师能继续关心和支持我，并能对我的问题酌情处理。

此致

敬礼!

学生：李xx

尊敬的领导：你好!

今天在工作时我没有做好自己的工作!在线路板上写字，并被领导发现，我认真反思，为我自己的行为感到了深深的内疚和不安，在此，我谨向领导做出了深刻的检讨。

通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事，但同时，也是我对自己工作的放松，带来的结果，经反思我觉得自己在工作责任心上仍旧非常欠缺，更为重要的是我感到对不起领导对我的信任，愧对领导的关心，这次的事使我不仅感到是自己耻辱。我深深的感到这种行为是一个非常不好的倾向，也是一个极为重要的苗头，如果不是领导及时发现，并要求自己深刻反醒，而我还这样下去，那么后果极为严重，甚至无法想像会发生怎样的工作失误，在此我在像领导做出检讨的同时也向你们表示发自内心的感谢!总之我的行为给公司带来了不好的影响，做出了这样的行为，我的心情非常沉重和羞愧。

发生这件事，我知道无论怎样都不足以拟补我的过错，因此我不请求领导的宽恕，无论领导怎样从严从重的处分我，我都不会有任何意见，同时!我请求领导在给我一次机会，让我可以通过自己的行动来表示自己的觉醒，以加倍努力的工作来为公司的工作做出积极的贡献，请领导相信我。

望领导能念在我是初犯，我保证以后不再有类似的情况发生，我真诚地接受批评，并愿意接受处理。对于这一切我还将进一步深入总结，深刻反省，恳请领导相信我能够记取教训、改正错误!

检讨人：

20xx年6月23日

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

我不对，我有错，我辜负家长，教师，教导，培训学校的期望。一个良好的学校要注意倾听和记住教诲。我学习不认真的态度真的让我感到惭愧!我不够深入学习意识。我真的发现了我的缺点和错误。再次，我这种行为还是引起了学校的学生，其不良影响，破坏了学校的形象。应保持相互之间的学生在学习，相互促进，而我这样的表现，给学生带来了一个坏头，不利于学校和院系的学风建设，是为教师的关注，为照顾我们，所以我将继续听取老师，如果老师完全理解我们的要求，并确保类似事件不会发生。希望老师给了我一个改过自新的机会。教师希望我们成为社会的栋梁，通过这件事恨铁不成钢的感受，使我感到非常心理学有罪，我深深感受到教师，我太深刻的教育，在此感谢我的老师。

我诚恳地接受批评，并愿意接受处理。所有这一切，我也将进一步深入灵魂总结搜索，我保证，经过认真研究和每一天!请老师相信我可以吸取经验为了老师辛苦地花了平常所没有的，大量时间和大量耐性给我的教导，为了不再让老师和我丧失宝贵的时间，我依循老师写了这份检讨，检讨自己的错误，由于本人第一次写检讨且加脑袋愚钝，虽用整个午休时间和不让精神休憩外加眼酸……怀着沉重复杂的心情写这篇检讨，但还是写得不好，只怿自己才蔬学浅，不能更好的运用我们深厚的汉语言文化，敬请老师谅解。

为了感谢老师的淳淳教导，我在此保证如果有一次重来的机会放在我面前，我尽我之所能克制自己，绝不让老师失望。请老师谅解我这一次的错误吧! 教训，改正错误

：

尊敬的领导：

我怀着自责、反省和感激的心情写这份检讨书，在单位3年的日子里，这里留给我了很多成长的脚印，留给我了很多感动的画面，留给我了很多悔恨的泪水，更留给我了很多从做人到做事的经验和教训。看着自己到现在仍然保存被正熙酒店录用的短信，回想每一次谢总对我的教导、和同事一起并肩作战的情景，心中太多怀念和回忆以及对自己犯下错误的悔恨。

作为一名管理者，部门的管理好坏，部门员工的思想好坏和自己平时的努力、付出是分不开的。在从刚刚到正熙酒店的全心投入、认真工作到现在整个部门发生的事情，以及对酒店、对其他同事造成的影响，我是付有不可推卸的责任的。经过认真、仔细的反省，我认为在以下几点是我犯下的错误：

1、在自己对工作的用心以及投入上面。

任何一件事情，如果不全身心投入，就没有办法去做好，做人如此，做事也如此。对于自己的工作，对于酒店对我的信任、对于一个团队对我的信任，我没有把所有的心思都放在工作上，在思想上的松懈，导致了部门管理的松懈，导致了部门业务的监督不力。

2、在作为一名管理者与员工之间扮演角色上面。

作为一名管理者，应该分清自己在工作岗位上扮演的角色，认真履行自己的权利和职责，对于我来讲，一直以来对于员工，把生活和工作没有分开，过于的在乎感情，以错误的方式给予员工错误的人际关系概念。

3、在部门监管力度方面。

作为一个部门经理，特别是作为酒店重要经营部门来讲，前台是有着大量现金和账务业务的部门，怎样从制度上约束员工，从业务上指导员工，通过不断的检查和复查，找出流程上存在的问题和预见可能发生的问题，是作为一个管理者必须要做和思考的事情。但是，在这点上面，我没有做到认真监督、努力去寻找及发现错误和漏洞，造成酒店的损失。

检讨人：

时间：

敬爱的老师：

今天我怀着愧疚和懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对旷课这种不良行为的深刻认识以及以后再也不旷课的决心。早在我踏进校门，老师就已三申五令一再强调全班同学不得旷课，但是我还是旷课了。关于旷课的事情，我觉得有必要说一说。事情的经过是这样的：出于对足球的热爱，我今天踢球有点过于投入，以致于没有注意到上课的时间。但我毕竟还是旷了一节课，我觉得有必要而且也是应该向老师做出这份书面检讨，让我自己深深的反省一下自己的错误。对不起，老师!我犯的是一个严重的原则性的问题。我知道，老师对于我的无故旷课也非常的生气。我也知道，对于学生，保证每堂课按时上课，不早退，不旷课是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我渐渐的认识到自己将要为自己的冲动付出代价了。老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，如今大错既成，我深深懊悔不已。如果不是因为平时生活过于懒散也不至于如此。

为了更好的认识错误，也是为了让老师你能够相信学生我能够真正的改正自己的错误，保证不再重犯，我将自己所犯的错误归结如下：思想上的错误：对于自己不是很感兴趣的课程的重视不够。对于这一点，我开始反省的时候并没有太在意，但是，经过深刻的反省，我终于认识到了，这个错误才是导致我旷课的重要原因。试问：如果我很喜欢这门课程，我自己会无故随意旷这门课吗?这个错误也反映到了我平时没有旷课的课堂效率上。很多我不感兴趣的课程，往往我并没有自始自终的专心听讲，这种行为虽然没有扰乱同学和老师的教与学，但是这对于自己来说，却是一个更严重的错误。

对于学校开设的每一门课程都有学校的理由，我们作为学生就更应该去认真学习。而对于我旷课的事情，所造成的严重后果我也始料未及：1、让老师担心我的安全。本应按时出现的我未能按时出现，试问怎么不会让平时十分关心爱护每一个学生的老师担心。而这样的担心很可能让老师整天工作分心，造成更为严重的后果。2、在同学们中间造成了不良的影响。由于我一个人的旷课，有可能造成别的同学的效仿，影响班级纪律性，也是对别的同学的父母的不负责。3、影响个人综合水平的提高，使自身在本能提高的条件下未能得到提高，违背父母的意愿，实乃不孝。

经过自己的不断反省，，我决定有如下个人整改措施：1、按照老师要求缴纳保质保量的检讨书一份!对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其可能造成的严重后果。2、制定学习计划，认真克服生活懒散、粗心大意的缺点，努力将期考考好，以好成绩来弥补我的过错;3、和同学们加强沟通，保证不再出现上述错误。请关心爱护我的老师同学继续监督、帮助我改正缺点，取得更大的进步。

检讨人：名字