检检讨书分几个部分【汇集20篇】

您们在19日的宿舍安全检查中，在吾宿舍发现一根长达约1.5米的电热棒，并对此作出当场没收和写下检讨书的处罚。尽管那只电热棒最后一次使用已经是三个月之前的事了!但是，对此我们深表接受和歉意!

虽然我们当时也是迫不得已。在那隆冬时节，那是一段寒风凛冽的日子，那是一段北风呼啸的日子，由于宿舍没有热水，我们怀着不安的心情，从小贩手中颤抖得接过那只罪恶的电热棒。我们错了，我们真的错了。。。我们对不起党和人民的栽培，对不起从小到大辛勤教育我们的园丁们，我们更对不起体育老师们，从小体育老师就教导我们要热爱锻炼，要多锻炼，每天跑上个XX米。我们顽固的就是不听老师的劝告，邪恶的懒惰思想充斥着我们的心理，我们就是不愿提着桶下五层楼走五分钟到饭堂前面的热水机打热水。。。。。。

我们还对不起毛爷爷，邓爷爷，江爷爷和胡爷爷。。。。。。没有他们前仆后继的建设和发展我们伟大的祖国，我们就没有机会生活在这么好的年代，也没有机会来到大学，更没有机会在这个1500一学期的时而没有热水的、有洗衣机没有电的、没有空调的怀旧式上铺下桌的经典宿舍。。。。。。当然，也就没有机会在宿舍使用电热棒了!

上海商学院的悲惨事例到如今依然历历在目，如此惨痛的教训居然没有唤醒我们麻木的心灵!到如今还保存着那根“恶贯满盈”的电热棒。我们反思，我们深刻的反思，我们从心里开始反思。。。。

我很后悔，当您们在由心的教导我们不能使用违规电器时，我还以“寒冬无热水才用”为借口，企图逃脱您们的教育，我很惭愧!因为您们说的对——“困难是要靠人来克服的”。以后再没有热水我们一定去充热水卡，吃点小苦算什么，这点儿苦跟当初红军长征爬雪山过草地比起来，算得了什么??!!!

我们保证，今后一定秉承中华民族优良传统的美德——勤劳朴实，吃苦耐劳的精神，以学校的规章制度为准则来约束自己。以后这种事情再也不会在我们宿舍发生。就算冬天没有热水，也一定去充热水，如果不充热水，就是宁洗冷水也不用电热棒。。。。。。

通过对这次旷课错误的深切反思和检讨，我决定重新设立自己的学习计划和目标，保证再不无故旷课，尤其是对自己有极大帮助的课。整顿自己的思想错误，提高觉悟性。并在平时的学习和工作中提高自身的素质。制定学习和工作计划，再不懒散和放纵自己。

这是一次十分深刻的检查，我对于我这次犯的错误感到很惭愧，我真的不应该不重视老师说的话，我不应该违背老师的话，我们作为学生就应该完全的听从老师的话，而我这次没有很好的重视到老师讲的话。我感到很抱歉，我希望老师可以原谅我的错误，我这次的悔过真的很深刻。 不过，人总是会犯错误的，当然我知道也不能以此作为借口，我们还是要尽量的避免这样的错误发生，希望老师可以相信我的悔过之心。“人有失手，马有失蹄”。我的不良行为不是向老师的纪律进行挑战。绝对是失误，老师说的话很正确，就是想要犯错误也不应该再您的面前犯错误，我感到真的是很惭愧，怎么可以这么的...... 相信老师看到我的这个态度也可以知道我对这次的事件有很深刻的悔过态度，我这样如此的重视这次的事件，希望老师可以原谅我的错误。“我错了”这句话对您来说显得太苍白无力了，“我下次不敢了”。似乎也不能打动您的心，但这真的是我内心的真实写照，我也许并不太会用语言表达我想要表达的意思，但我真心希望您能从我的文字中读出深深地悔意和我要表达的痛改前非的决心。

如今大错已成，我深深懊悔不已，深刻检讨，认为我在思想中已深藏了致命的错误，思想觉悟也不高，更没有很好地掌控自己的情感反而让情感掌控了我，我的定力还是不够的坚定。 导员，虽然我的言语不多，写字也很潦草，但这正是我急切想表明我真的知道我错了的迫切心情。对于以上的错误，我已经深深的认识到了它们的严重性，特别是旷课——这种损人却又不利己的错误。为了更好的向老师检讨自己，我特提出以下几点改正意见，好让自己和老师同学督促自己改正我的错误：

1.向老师认错。既然自己已经犯了错，我就应该去面对，要认识到自己的错误，避免以后犯同样的错误。所以，我写下这篇深刻的检讨，向老师表明我认错的决心。

2.提高纪律性。我应该认真学习学校的校规校纪，并且做到自觉遵守。不迟到，不早退，不旷课。有事应该先向老师请假。

3.提高自己的思想觉悟。对各门课程都应该引起重视，并且要养成良好的学习和生活作风。

4.好好学习，培养自己广泛的兴趣。作为学生，特别是新世纪的学生，学好学校开设的每门课程外，更应该培养自己广泛的兴趣爱好，让自己成为具有多种本领的人。这不仅仅是为了自己的明天，更是为了祖国的明天。

首先，我怀着愧疚和懊悔的心情郑重地向的领导说声：对不起!这几天，通过领导的批评教育和深刻的自我反省，我对自己领导下的XXXXX擅自外出旅游有了清醒的认识，使得自己历年来勤勤勉勉的工作态度出现了污点，让关心XXXXX发展的领导操心担忧和牵挂。对此，我深感愧疚和悔恨，对自己的政治意识的疏忽和不严密做出深刻检讨，并深层次上分析原因，明确今后的努力和方向。

下面，就错误发生的根源、具体表现，造成的影响等方面做一次深刻的检讨。

一、事情的发生及经过

近期以来，XXXXX团队努力进取，XXOO各项业务在稳健、有序、健康地发展。为了丰富员工的生活，激励和提高员工的工作热情和士气，XXOO办公室在X月X日呈上一份关于外出旅游的方案。

因为早在之前的几年里，XXOO员工在会议中或者私下里多次提出渴望外出旅游的期盼。考虑XXOO全体员工近年来立足岗位兢兢业业、任劳任怨，为XXOO的发展作出了积极而富有成效的贡献，同时也考虑到旅游能让辛勤工作的每位员工在外出游行中寻找快乐、增长见识，放松紧张的神经，增强XXOO的凝聚力和员工间的团队精神，我在欠缺考虑的

情况下便签字同意了。

然而，在未经得同意和报备的情况下，XXXXX便根据办公室的方案日程安排于X月X日和X月X日分两批前往福建旅行，并分别在X月X日和X月X日相继归来上班。

二、犯下的错误及影响

1、欠缺考虑，缺乏纪律意识。作为XXOO的负责人，没有对整个该事件进行细致和全盘考虑，没有从全局观念出发考虑问题，只单纯地从员工私心来考虑。更为严重的是，组织纪律意识淡薄，在外出旅游之前没有认真贯彻落实的《外出管理制度》，没有严格履行外出请假和报备手续，是我组织纪律观念淡薄的体现。有可能造成的后果就是其他部门的效仿，对LLLLL的《外出管理制度》是一种破坏。而一个企业和团队能够长久生存，其最重要的维系力就是制度和纪律。制度是企业运营的保障，没有好制度的组织和团队，就像是一支没有纪律的军队，是没有战斗力。作为XXOO负责人，身上更加肩负着制度化建设的责任，更应该带头去遵守下发的外出纪律管理要求。

2、心肠太软，缺乏竞争意识。有人说，“软心肠”能释出善意，传出爱心，奏出和谐。作为XXOO负责人，本意是想通过此次集体旅游得到员工的尊重和拥戴，能够激发、影响员工的潜能和热情，“点醒”沉睡中的员工，最大限度地发挥他们的积极性和创造性。但是我忽略了我们的各项管理

制度和手段都应以规章为前提。

3、粗心大意，缺乏及时上报意识。尊重领导，服务客户，团结集体，这是每一个单位能够又好又快发展的基础。XXOO是一艘船，行长是船长，遵规守纪才能让这艘船在风浪中平稳快速地航行。在没有及时向上报旅行方案的前提下就擅自外出，这种态度是不负责任的做法，也是非常严重的错误行为，给不良之风起了头，这是对领导不尊重也是对XXOO员工不负责任的的行为，这更是我要检讨和反省的地方。

4、想法单纯，缺乏危机感。由于此次旅游出行考虑时过于单纯，对擅自出行所造成的后果考虑的不全面，不充分，没有及时向申请和报备，让领导为我们担忧和牵挂，对此我表示万分歉意和愧疚。

三、上述错误的分析和反省

通过领导的批评教育，我对自己的思想意识，工作方法等方面进行了系统梳理并认真反省，主要有一下几点认识：

1、认识到自己处理问题上考虑过于简单。今后做任何决定都要从大局出发，在考虑和处理事情上要做到全面和细致，周详考虑不再轻易为之。

2、认识到自己在工作上对规章制度的遵守有待进一步提高。此次擅自外出旅行，造成了不良之风的起头，今后要以这件事为教训，吸取经验教训，做好“有事先报告”，从而提高自我的思想意思，强化责任意识。

四、今后的努力方向

这次，我犯了擅自组织外出旅游的错误，我深深懊悔不已，我会将此次事件作为一面镜子时时检点自己、批评自己、教育自己，自觉接受的监督。我要知羞而警醒，知羞而奋进，化羞耻为动力，努力工作，加强自律。

对于一次错误，我还将进一步深入总结，深刻反省，以诚恳的态度承认自己的错误，积极改正，并在以后的工作中加强学习和改进。不断提高领导工作业务能力;不断提高自己处理复杂问题的能力;不断改进工作方式方法，以此推进XXOO各项业务稳步、快速增长。

最后，我愿意接受领导给我的任何教育和批评，并在此恳请领导的原谅、帮助和教育，使我改正错误，为XXXXX增长效益、拓宽业务上新台阶做出自己应尽的贡献! 此致

敬礼

检讨人：

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

敬爱的x老师：

鉴于期中考试国贸科作弊的情况，本人特写以下检讨：

我在考国贸的时候，后面的一位仁兄叫我把我的试卷给他抄，我给了他。因为我认为乐于助人是中华民族一直以来的传统美德，继承和发扬中华民族的传统美德是每一个中国人义不容辞的责任。有道是救人一命。胜造七级浮屠。我怀着的是一颗赤诚的心，大地为证，皇天可鉴，然而万想不到，这竞酿成弥天大祸。不仅不能帮助别人，还连累了自己。就似大麻鸦片，害己害人、害人害国。所以，我下定决心，痛改前非，决不在考试作弊了。

助人为乐是可取的，但在考试中的助人为乐就不可取，这在方式上已经误入歧途了。以后的日子，我一定会勤加学习马克思列宁主义、毛泽东思想、dxp理论，积极改造自己的人生观、世界观和价值观，以求自己对宇宙人生有正确的认识。认识什么可取、什么不可取;可取的，应用什么方式对待、不可取的，又应用什么方式对待。

鉴于期中考试数学课两张试卷相同的情况本人特作以下诠释：

刚开始考试的时候，我就发现自己有两张相同的试卷。我问隔离的女生，她说一张是答题卷，所以我就不上报。交卷的时候，我把选择题和填空题的答案写在答题卡上，而解答题的答案就直接写在试卷上，还写上自己的姓名、班级、学号一齐上交。可监考老师瞪眉怒目恶生恶气的问我怎么有两张相同的试卷，我答是刚考试就有的。她恶狠狠的把我的试卷抽出来丢在一边。我想：和她解释可能会越讲越激，反正我没作弊。问心无愧。

待人有礼也是中华民族一直来的传统美德。虽然我谈不上待人谦逊有礼，但也不至于对人态度恶劣。或许，我在说话和态度上有些偏颇，但她那副凶相，好似认定我作弊了，我只认为和她讲不清楚，所以自顾走出考场。

我没有作弊，我问心无愧。

学生：xx

各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府，国务院各部委、各直属机构：

经国务院批准，现将2016年元旦、春节、清明节、劳动节、端午节、中秋节和国庆节放假调休日期的具体安排通知如下。

一、元旦：1月1日放假，与周末连休。

二、春节：2月7日至13日放假调休，共7天。2月6日(星期六)、2月14日(星期日)上班。

三、清明节：4月4日放假，与周末连休。

四、劳动节：5月1日放假，5月2日(星期一)补休。

五、端午节：6月9日至11日放假调休，共3天。6月12日(星期日)上班。

六、中秋节：9月15日至17日放假调休，共3天。9月18日(星期日)上班。

七、国庆节：10月1日至7日放假调休，共7天。10月8日(星期六)、10月9日(星期日)上班。

节假日期间，各地区、各部门要妥善安排好值班和安全、保卫等工作，遇有重大突发事件，要按规定及时报告并妥善处置，确保人民群众祥和平安度过节日假期。

国务院办公厅

2015年12月10日

春节，是农历正月初一，又叫阴历年，俗称“过年”。这是我国民间最隆重、最热闹的一个传统节日。春节的历史很悠久，它起源于殷商时期年头岁尾的祭神祭祖活动。按照我国农历，正月初一古称元日、元辰、元正、元朔、元旦等，俗称年初一，到了民国时期，改用公历，公历的一月一日称为元旦，把农历的一月一日叫春节。

春节到了，意味着春天将要来临，万象复苏草木更新，新一轮播种和收获季节又要开始。人们刚刚度过冰天雪地草木凋零的漫漫寒冬，早就盼望着春暖花开的日子，当新春到来之际，自然要充满喜悦载歌载舞地迎接这个节日。

千百年来，人们使年俗庆祝活动变得异常丰富多彩，每年从农历腊月二十三日起到年三十，民间把这段时间叫做“迎春日”，也叫“扫尘日”，在春节前扫尘搞卫生，是我国人民素有的传统习惯。

然后就是家家户户准备年货，节前十天左右，人们就开始忙于采购物品，年货包括鸡鸭鱼肉、茶酒油酱、南北炒货、糖饵果品，都要采买充足，还要准备一些过年时走亲访友时赠送的礼品，小孩子要添置新衣新帽，准备过年时穿。

在节前要在住宅的大门上粘贴红纸黄字的新年寄语，也就是用红纸写成的春联。屋里张贴色彩鲜艳寓意吉祥的年画，心灵手巧的姑娘们剪出美丽的窗花贴在窗户上，门前挂大红灯笼或贴福字及财神、门神像等，福字还可以倒贴，路人一念福倒了，也就是福气到了，所有这些活动都是要为节日增添足够的喜庆气氛。

春节的另一名称叫过年。在过去的传说中，年是一种为人们带来坏运气的想象中的动物。年一来。树木凋蔽，百草不生;年一过，万物生长，鲜花遍地。年如何才能过去呢?需用鞭炮轰 ，于是有了燃鞭炮的习俗，这其实也是烘托热闹场面的又一种方式。

春节是个欢乐祥和的节日，也是亲人团聚的日子，离家在外的孩子在过春节时都要回家欢聚。过年的前一夜，就是旧年的腊月三十夜，也叫除夕，又叫团圆夜，在这新旧交替的时候，守岁是最重要的年俗活动之一，除夕晚上，全家老小都一起熬年守岁，欢聚酣饮，共享天伦之乐，北方地区在除夕有吃饺子的习俗，饺子的作法是先和面，和字就是合;饺子的饺和交谐音，合和交有相聚之意，又取更岁交子之意。在南方有过年吃年糕的习惯，甜甜的粘粘的年糕，象征新一年生活甜蜜蜜，步步高。

待第一声鸡啼响起，或是新年的钟声敲过，街上鞭炮齐鸣，响声此起彼伏，家家喜气洋洋，新的一年开始了，男女老少都穿着节日盛装，先给家族中的长者拜年祝寿，节中还有给儿童压岁钱，吃团年饭，初二、三就开始走亲戚看朋友，相互拜年，道贺祝福，说些恭贺新喜、恭喜发财、恭喜、过年好等话，祭祖等活动。

节日的热烈气氛不仅洋溢在各家各户，也充满各地的大街小巷，一些地方的街市上还有舞狮子，耍龙灯，演社火，游花市，逛庙会等习俗。这期间花灯满城，游人满街，热闹非凡，盛况空前，直要闹到正月十五元宵节过后，春节才算真正结束了。

春节是汉族最重要的节日，但是满、蒙古，瑶、壮、白、高山、赫哲、哈尼、达斡尔、侗、黎等十几个少数民族也有过春节的习俗，只是过节的形式更有自己的民族特色，更蕴味无穷。

尊敬的校领导：

在此非常感谢您能抽出宝贵的时间来看我的检讨，我作为一名小学教师，在后半学期我没有按照学校规定制度及教学进度计划写教案，没有让学生们按任务量写作业，未及时批改作业，作为一名教师这就是一种不负责任的行为，本人为自己这种不负责任的行为做出深刻的检讨。本次严重错误都是因为本人工作态度不端正导致的工作失误，我对错误的全面认识如下：

作为一名年轻的人民教师，我的思想觉悟上存在严重不足，我的工作作风懒散，不够严谨。像我这样的工作业务失误，在大多数情况下，都是因为自己对工作态度的不端正、不上进才犯下的。我这种对工作不重视、不专心，不严谨恰恰暴露出我懒散的工作作风。

而我在日常工作中又缺乏谨慎态度，没有以一个严谨、认真的态度面对自己的工作。我此等错误的发生，跟我在日常工作中存在懈怠、偷懒、怕吃苦等因素是分不开的。这表露出了我在工作作风上的严重问题，以及在工作上的不成熟和不严谨。

教师是一个神圣的职业，被誉为人类灵魂的工程师，辛勤的园丁，无私奉献的红烛;是连接知识与学生的桥梁;是知识的传授者。家长既然把孩子交给了我们，我们就有责任去教好学生。

我已经从这次教训中吸取了经验，今后必定会更加注意!

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

尊敬的领导：

几天来，我认真反思，深刻自剖，为自己的行为感到了深深地愧疚和不安，在此，我谨向各位领导做出深刻检讨，并将我几天来的思想反思结果向领导汇报如下：

反省错误之前，必先回顾错误，2012年1月28日，上级局领导来我公司检查，之前公司就给我们召开了紧急会议，公司领导非常重视这次的检查，要求我们认真热情的对待领导的检查工作。而我就在这次检查工作中，犯了一个致命的错误，在领导一行20余人到来的时候，我竟然只顾埋头自己的工作，连一声问候都没有表达。我的错误是严重的、是深刻的、是要不得的。这是工作态度不端正，服务意识淡薄，辜负了领导的期望，白受了一回高等教育。

从小，我爷爷就教育我，待人接物要大方得体，有礼有貌，我就不明白自己怎么岁数见长，越来越不懂事了呢。通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，工作作风涣散的必然结果，也是与我们公司的企业精神背道而行。记得刚上班的时候，我对自己的要求还是比较高的，时时处处也都能遵守相关规章制度，从而努力完成各项工作。但近年来，由于工作逐渐走上了轨道，而自己对单位的一切也比较熟悉了，尤其是领导对我的关怀和帮(检讨书 />

短短的文字，不能表述我对我自己的谴责，和后悔。请领导继续关心监督、帮助我改正缺点，取得更大的进步和成功。

此致

敬礼

这次期中考试，我考的很差，对此在这检讨，希望以后不要再考这个分数

学英语，最重要的就是读，听，背，只要这三个你能100%做到的话，你的英语成绩，没有90分，也能85分。

但是，我却偏偏相反了，没有听，没有写，没有背，自以为事，以为自己多聪明，所以什么都只做了三分之一，导致成绩不理想

以后，我决定了，好好学习，天天向上，在此，我订了一份每天必做的一份学习计划，我必须照做：

每天读英语课文，十次或五次。

每天不断的背单词，重复的背，直到背得滚瓜烂熟。

每天听写课文，直到会默为止。

上课认真听讲，思维跟着老师走，积极思考问题。

语文考试没考好检讨书语文考试没考好检讨书下课后，把老师上课讲的内容复习一边，不懂得一定要提问。

认真完成作业。

不能经常开电脑，开电脑就得先读英语。

回到家里预习。

将家长买来的练习认真地完成。

请一个家教，让他把我的英语成绩提高起来，多给我讲讲语法的知识。

睡觉前，想想英语课讲了什么。

我一定，必须每天做到以上的所有学习计划，并且尽量的更正学习的态度!!!

我在此发誓：

我一定要好好学英语，每时每刻按照自己拟定的学习计划，不得违抗，否则考试考得不好!!!

今天,我怀着愧疚的心情,写下这份检查.以向您表示我的决心和悔改之意，只希望老师能够给我一个改正错误的机会。

以前我没有意识到自己的散漫和无知，上课总是不认真听讲,导致我考试没考好。

现在我十分重视，并从内心上谴责自己，反省自己。要从自己身上找错误，查不足，深刻的反醒。

我知道，错了并不重要，重要的是在自己做错事的时候，能够正确的认识到自己的错误，并且知道如何改过自身，所以我在以后的日子里，会格外的严格要求自己。

现在我对自己的学习也有了新的要求。我一定不会在同一地方摔倒。做事情，要有始有终,学习更是一样,不能够半途而废。

我现在已经深刻的认识到了自己的错误，找到了自己身上存在的不足。所以,我要感谢老师让我写了这份检查,让我更加深刻的认识到自己的错误,

希望老师能够再给我一次机会，我一定会好好努力，不再让老师及家长失望。请老师看我的实际行动吧，我会努力学习的。

好好学习,遵守校纪校规是我们每个学生应该做的,也是中华民族的优良传统美德,可是我作为当代的学生却没有好好的把它延续下来。就像很多中国青年都不知道有圣诞节，却隆重的去过圣诞节一样。我们都在无知中遗失了纪律，不明白自己的学习目的

尊敬的张老师：

您好!我怀着一颗沉重的心来向您表达我深深的歉意。遵照你的旨意我在教室反省两节课后写下这篇检讨书，全班同学可以给我作证。检讨书具体内容如下，若有不认同的地方可以直接找我协商：

我因上课玩手机被老师收去，千错万错都是我一个人的错，我不应该在上课时间玩手机。我们青少年是祖国的花朵，是祖国的希望，本应该为中华之崛起而读书，可我却利用上课时间玩手机。

我知道我犯了无法挽回的错误，手机本应该被老师没收，但我知道老师您是慈祥的，是伟大的，是不会没收我的手机的。为表达我的歉意，我决定将之前拖欠的作业补上来，麻烦老师为我提供抄写作业的样本。我保证我今后不会再上课时间玩手机，某位名人曾说过“聪明的人不会第二次犯同样的错误”像我这样聪明伶俐的人是不会再次犯错的，老师您说是吧。

但是金无足赤，人无完人，请老师给我一次改过自新的机会，明天将会是一个崭新的自我站在您面前。我改正决心就像精卫填海一样坚定，我将会以真实性及形象生动性的表现方式来做到上课不玩手机。

如果老师放学后能将手机还我的话，这将会是对我精神上最大的鼓励，你的宽容大量能激发我奋发向上、努力学习的决心，我还会向全校同学宣传老师您的宽容大量，让全校的同学都知道你是怎样的一位好老师，这样有利于您加薪升职。

① 信头(Heading)，也叫信端，指发信人的地址和写信日期。其写法主要有全部齐头式(信头位于信纸的左上角)和半齐头式(信头位于信纸的右上角)两种。

② 信内地址(Inside Name & Address)指收信人的姓名和地址，写在信纸的左上角，从信纸的左边顶格写起，低于信头一、两行。

③ 称呼(Salutation)是对收信人的称呼用语，自成一行，写在低于信内地址一、两行的地方，从信纸的左边顶格写起，每个词的开头字母用大写或至少首词和专有名词的第一个字母用大写，末尾用逗号。

④ 正文(Body)

⑤ 结束语(Complimentary Close)是写信人自己对收信人的一种谦称，只占一行，低于正文一、两行，从信纸的中间或稍右的地方开始，第一个词的开头字母用大写，末尾用逗号。

⑥ 签名(Signature)

一般低于结束用语一、二行，从信纸中间偏右的地方开始。

⑦ 附件(Enclosure, 缩写为Encl.或Enc.)

信件如有附件，应在左下角注明Encl.或Enc.。

尊敬的单位领导：

您好，我怀着无比愧疚的心情向你们递交这份工作方式不当的检讨书，我无视单位规则纪律而多次私用车辆的行为给单位造成了很多一定的经济损失，也给单位管理规范造成了一定的负面消极影响，为此我向领导同志表示深深地歉意。并郑重地向您说一句：对不起，我错了!首先我对自己这份在驾驶员工作当中为自己谋私利的行为感到深深地愧疚。

我犯错的原因牵涉种种，但归根结底还是我无视了公司规则制度，擅自谋私所致。是我主观方面的严重失误，此刻我并不想说说出种种缘由与狡辩来掩盖我的错误。关于我7月里的工作作风不当行为，是我来单位这么长时间工作以来犯下最为严重的错误。

20xx年7月这段时间，我的驾驶任务大多安排在中午与晚间，有时候常常遇到一些意外状况急需我开车前去，加上有时候要接送一些人，有时候是家人与亲戚朋友确实有急事了，我一时心急就捎带上车，也更有自己因为要接送家人与朋友，私自用车的情况。如此总计，我私用车辆总计行驶了1500公里。我觉得很有必要在反省此次我犯错行为之前，对所犯错误做一次深刻的回顾和认识。

然而，作为一名遵义高速公路开发投资有限公司的驾驶员，我的职责所在是将车辆用于公司的日常使用上。我所驾驶的车辆应该是为了公司利益而行驶的，不能是谋求私利给自己图方便图省力。

敬爱的x导员：

今天，我怀着愧疚和懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以想您表示我对逃课这种不良行为的深刻认识以及我决定再也不逃课的决心。

早在我进入大学之初，我就坚定了好好学习，努力成才的决心，但是我却辜负了老师、家长以及同学的关心，我逃课了。虽然我逃课是由于许久不曾回家，又因“五·一”放假三天而我回家在路途上就需要消耗两天的时间，故而我逃了一天的课，但我真的不是存心不想上课的，我错过了老师为我们精心准备的无比生动的课，错过了一次老师呕心沥血给我们制作的知识大餐，这莫过于人生的一大损失。

逃课后，我满怀愧疚之情，在家里呆了两天也是惴惴不安的，一方面觉得对不住老师的谆谆教诲，另一方面还要对父母谎称放了4天假而无比的羞愧，这4天的“假”我是在良心的一次次谴责中度过的，我觉得自己“上对不起天，下对不起地，中间对不起自己的良心”。

对不起，导员!这次我犯的是一个严重的原则性错误。错误已经发生，我却不知如何挽回，只好告诫自己要努力把握好今后的每一分钟，时时刻刻铭记导员的教导，努力学习，争创辉煌。最起码也要学会立足社会的知识，掌握自力更生的能力。

导员的反复教导犹言在耳，严肃认真的表情仍旧在眼前，我深深为之震撼，也深刻地认识到事已至此的严重性。

在我返校的前几天里，我一直期待您来找我训话，惩罚我，借以减轻我心中的负罪感，我有好几次甚至想主动去找您坦诚错误，但我终究还是没有跨越那道线，我退缩了，我是真的不知该对您说什么，“我错了”这句话对您来说显得太苍白无力了，“我下次不敢了”。似乎也不能打动您的心，但这真的是我内心的真实写照，我也许并不太会用语言表达我想要表达的意思，但我真心希望您能从我的文字中读出深深地悔意和我要表达的痛改前非的决心。

如今大错已成，我深深懊悔不已，深刻检讨，认为我在思想中已深藏了致命的错误，思想觉悟也不高，更没有很好地掌控自己的情感反而让情感掌控了我，我的定力还是不够的坚定。

导员，虽然我的言语不多，写字也很潦草，但这正是我急切想表明我真的知道我错了的迫切心情。

我真的错了，我保证我再也不犯了!

我保证!

我会用以后学习生活中的事想您保证，您会看到一个全新的我!

我会用事实证明!

我会在以后的日子里想您保证，我一定再也不会犯样的错误了!

您的学生

xxx

尊敬的老师：

由于我上课没注意听讲，以至于我没听到留作业的信息，所以我没按时交作业。我认为我应该写检讨，我应该勇于承认自己的错误。这种行为是对自己的不负责的行为，我辜负了家长的期望，辜负了老师的期望。

由于我的疏忽，有可能养成不良的习惯，轻者荒废自己的学业，重者从此而堕落，从而走上犯罪的道路，危害人民，危害社会，危害国家。

如果我今天按时交了作业，可以使自己的习惯得以得到良好的保持。说不定可以使自己的学习成绩更上一成楼，说不定从此走向理想的高中，走向理想的大学，走向理想的工作岗位。从而造福于人民，造福于社会，造福于国家，还可能使自己名垂千史，成为社会中的一个璀璨明珠。

所以这看似不起眼的行为，可能会造成无数的错误。所以我不应该再犯同样类似的错误，我下决心不犯如此低级的错误，以这种“黑暗”无比的错误，侵食自己的身体，侵食自己的灵魂。我衷心的再一次承认这严重的过失。

我应该在此向老师道歉，忠心的说一声“我错了，我不应该不按时交作业。”我犯的错误不但危害到自己，而且还玷污了您神圣的职业。我现在的心情仿佛象被困在笼中一样，无法原谅自己严重的错误，所以我恳求您的原谅，您的原谅会使我减少一些悔意。希望您以宽容原谅之手，从黑暗中将我懊悔的心捞出来。

老师，我向您保证，我以后再不会不按时交作业了，再也不会犯类似的错误。这低级的错误,看似微小但影响极大。由于我是班长，但却没有以身作则，这可能使那些没有自制能力的同学跟着犯错误，而且因为这次的错误而失去尊严，使那些厚颜无耻之徒得以笑柄，从而扰乱了课堂纪律，也使老师您上课还要浪费时间来组织课堂纪律，这也浪费了学生们接受知识的时间。而鲁迅曾经说过;“浪费别人的时间等于谋杀。”所以这使我成了思想中的杀人犯，使我的罪恶更加严重。

虽然只是没交作业，但影响极坏。正应了那句俗话;“秤砣虽小压千斤”。借此我也想以自己的错误来警戒我的同学们，你们要注意，千万不要跌进不交作业的泥潭，千万不要“勿以恶小而为之，勿以善小而不为。”如果你去做了，就会失掉你自己的光明前途，就会使自己学习生涯留下污点，成为你终生的遗憾。

所以我应该再次向您道歉：老师 我错了。我以我的灵魂保证，我再也不会犯这种错误了。现在我只想请求您的原谅，只有这样我的心中才能好过些。

检讨人

检讨时间

范文一：

尊敬的领导：

今天由于我犯得错误，所以只得在这里写这份上班迟到检讨书范文。其实，我也一直认为上班迟到是一个很大的问题。

通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，工作做风涣散的必然结果，这种不良思潮的最直接表现就是自由散漫!在这件事中，我还感到，自己在工作责任心上仍就非常欠缺。在自己的思想中，仍就存在得过且过，混日子的应付思想。现在，我深深感到，这是一个非常危险的倾向!如果放任自己继续放纵和发展，那么，后果是极其严重的，甚至都无法想象会发生怎样的工作失误。我对我个人迟到所犯下的这个严重错误感到痛心疾首，感到无比遗憾，感到非常可耻，感到无以复加的后悔与悲痛。

虽然，今天迟到的确是个意外，但是我不需解释什么，因为从中我看到了自己的不足之处，那就是好习惯要坚持，好风气要发扬。前段时间我做的工作得到了大家的一致认可，我很欣慰，同时干劲也更足。怎么能让这一次小小的意外影响到我的积极性呢。通过这一次迟到，我会认真反省，深刻思考。

我会以此次的检讨书作为一面镜子，时时检点自己，批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督。要知羞而警醒，知羞而奋进，亡羊补牢、化羞耻为动力，努力做到决不迟到，决不违反公司规章制度，决不做让领导失望的事，同时我也要通过这次事件，提高我的思想认识，强化我的时间观念。

最后，我想说，我怀着愧疚和懊悔给写下这份上班迟到检讨书，表示我对迟到的不良行为，已经有了深刻认识改正错误的决心!在写这份检讨书的同时，我真正意识到这件事情的严重性和错误，我感到非常愧疚!

请组织考验我。

检讨人：

时间：

范文二：

尊敬的领导:

您好!

今天，我迟到了，虽然您要我说出迟到的理由，可是我觉得现在说理由，都只是托词，我不想再为自己的错误找任何借口，那只能让我更加惭愧。 所以，我只想为上午的迟到行为表示歉意和检讨。

对于准时上班，我放在心上了，却没有特别重视，经常迟到几分钟到办公室，觉得这没有什么，其实这是一种非常不好的习惯。

一方面，这反应了一个员工的对于公司规章制度的重视程度，对工作的认真负责程度，另一方面，这会给同事和部门带来不好的影响。尤其我是一名个共产党员，平时更应该在工作中起模范带头作用，更应该杜绝迟到的行为。其实，我只要将闹钟调早10分钟，就可以避免迟到，可是我却没有这么做，归根到底还是思想上的问题。

我决心，从思想上重视公司的规章制度，保证以后准时上下班.

请领导放心!

检讨人：

时间：

范文三：

尊敬的公司领导：

今天上午，我迟到了5分钟，虽然领导说，说出迟到的理由，可是我觉得现在说理由，都只是托词，我不想再为自己的错误找任何借口，那只能让我更加惭愧。

所以，我只想为上午的迟到行为表示歉意和检讨。

对于准时上班，我一直都没有特别重视，经常迟到几分钟到办公室，觉得这没有什么，其实这是一种非常不好的习惯。

一方面，这反应了一个员工的对于公司规章制度的重视程度，对工作的认真负责程度，另一方面，这会给同事和部门带来了不好的影响。尤其我是一个共产党员，平时更应该在工作中起模范带头作用，更应该杜绝迟到的行为。其实，我只要将闹钟调早10分钟，就可以避免迟到，可是我却没有这么做，归根到底还是思想上的问题。

我决心，从思想上重视公司的规章制度，提高自己的思想觉悟，保证以后准时上下班。并保证每天努力工作，做到爱岗敬业，希望领导及各位同事能够接受我真诚的歉意，并能来监督我，指正我。

如果再出现类似迟到的事情，我甘愿受到公司规章制度的处分。

检讨人：

时间：

尊敬的领导同志：

您好，我怀着无比愧疚和遗憾的心情向您递交这份工作失职的检讨书。关于在XXXXX的综合楼建设项目的监督工作中，因我个人的疏忽，我没有能够充分地对工程全部材料的样本和实品做样品检查。没有认真核查账本，也没有在检查之后向您如实汇报。

我可以说是犯了一个最低级，最原则性的错误。我有罪啊，连这么基础的工作都没有做好，没有根据您的要求，把项目的进展情况着实地向了领导汇报。给公司造成了很大的负面影响，也导致了一些损失，同时也愧疚陈总对我的信任和关照。

但此次我通过自我反省，必须找出我工作失误的根本原因，我反思了一下。我犯错的根本原因在于，我自身这个马虎的性格，做事半心半意，敷衍了事。我知道这样的工作作风是极度危险的，这样的作风持续下去。很可能在未来造成更多更严重的错误。

针对我的错误，我反省了如下几点改正措施：

1，针对我的责任感不强，工作作风懒散，不实际。我深刻认识到作为一名材料部的负责人，我对很多事情应该亲自过问，不论处理的好坏，都应该给上级一个明确的汇报和交代。出来端正态度，认真工作之外，我也要抽出空闲时间提高自己的学习和专业水平，同时保持工作的细节。

2，我今后做事情必须严格要求自己，做一个认真负责，勤奋的工作人员。我要时时认真的了解组织领导的意图，不能将领导的意思偏之千里，要将自己的工作做好做精。

通过此次深刻的检讨，请陈总信任我。我今后一定认真努力地位公司做工作，为公司的发展献上自己微薄的一份力量。

检讨人：XXX

我是高一一班的同学**。因为在第一节微机课上说话所以写此检讨书。

因为今天是我们在**高中上的第一节微机课再加上是我第一次去我们学校的图书馆这里所有一切都深深地吸引着我，让我感到好奇所以我便和同桌说起了话。

在上课的时候老师让我们练打宁的标准指法而我却觉得无聊，便在荧屏上打字骂***，***看了之后非常生气，现在的家庭都是一个孩子，谁也不怕谁，当然谁也受不了这个气，***同学自然而然地在他的电脑回骂我，我当然不咽不下这口气，

我又回骂了他一句;他又回骂了我两句，

……

就这样我们谁也不服谁便从嘴转移到了手，

正在我们打得起劲时老师走了过来并把我们叫起来让我们“面壁反醒”真的好后悔我没有想那么多就让老师觉得也许我是个阴气的人。不过说实话我之所以犯下了严惩的错误是因为我真的挺喜欢上微机课的。因为我觉得这是所有高中课程中最有生气的一门功课了也许有点兴奋了，也许又有点太激动，所以我才会做成如此。

我知道错了，因为我爱电脑，爱的死去活来的，但我更不能因此而扰乱微机课的课堂纪律。请老师谅解我这次的无心，望老师能再给我一次，再相信我一次。我一定能保证今后我上微机课上的纪律。

请老师让我用实际行动和时间来证明我所保证的一切吧!

尊敬的老师：

我写这份检讨书，是真心的检讨自己所犯的错误，并且坚定我改正错误的决心。

在这里，我非常感谢老师给了我这次悔过的机会，我一定会珍惜这次机会。这次检查宿舍的时候，我们宿舍的卫生不合格，损坏了班集体的整体形象，给班集体形象带来了影响。 宿舍是我们学习生活中非常重要的一部分，搞好卫生不只是为了学校的要求，也是为了给我们自己提供一个良好的学习生活的地方，对我们身体的健康也是极为重要的。如果不搞好卫生，不止违反校规校纪，还会对自己的身心健康带来很大的伤害。

我一定痛改前非。只要我们宿舍全体成员坚持不懈的努力，对自己都严格要求，我们一定能够纠正我们以前的错误。在今后的学习生活中，我们将会拥有一个非常舒适的地方，那就是我们的宿舍。

我和我们宿舍由于宿舍卫生没有打扫好，给班集体的形象带来了影响，使班集体的荣誉受损，我们没有别的办法可以补救我们所犯的错误，只有通过现在以及以后得努力来改正我们的错误，争取不再犯这样的错误。我们要改的不仅是要搞好宿舍的卫生，还要从思想上明确其重要性。

在老师批评和教导之后，我们宿舍全体成员都认识到了自己所犯错误的严重性，都下定决心要改正。

早上起来 ，每个人整理好自己的内务，再由值日生负责宿舍的打扫工作。这也为我们赢来了一个非常舒服的学习生活的环境。这只是一个开始，不过这个良好的开始让我们更有信心在以后不会在犯以前同样的错误。只要我们宿舍集体把搞好卫生养成一种习惯，那么这样好的习惯就会一直保持下去。良好的整理内务的习惯，不止让我们会有一个舒适的环境，这还会影响到我们的各个方面。使得我们在学习生活中的其他方面也会变得更加认真负责。 。我们不止搞好了卫生，把自己的个人卫生整理的井井有条，并且保持的

也很好。也许有人不会相信我们，但是我们会用我们的实际行动来证明一切。空纸白话不能信服，我们会用实际行动努力坚持到底的。

我犯的错误，使我懊悔不已。我要改正，严格要求自己，在以后不在犯同样的错误。

我会铭记这次教训，并且以后努力改正。我恳请老师给我一个改过的机会，我在以后会用实际行动来证明的。

尊敬的老师，亲爱的同学们：

好好学习,遵守校纪校规是我们每个学生应该做的,也是中华民族的优良传统美德。 但我却没有做到。

首先，造成音乐课讲话最直接的原因是自我约束力差，上课思想开小差，觉得没事可做;不免相互交流，说话声音无所顾忌之时，就影响了上课上课说话检讨书300字上课说话检讨书300字。鲁迅先生说过 歌德也说 我们只有认真反思，寻找错误后面的深刻根源，认清问题的本质，才能给集体和自己一个交待，从而得以进步。

这次讲话违反了课堂纪律，影响了老师的工作，又辜负了父母对我殷切希望。 更让老师您为此事殚精竭虑，伤心失望 ，在写此检讨之时，我深感自己的无知，后悔之极。 上课不遵守纪律，决不是一件可忽略的小事!说明我没有很好的约束能力、自主学习能力!我们只有认认真真思考人生有那么多事要做，那么多的担子要挑，就没有理由在课堂上不遵守纪律了。

虽然怀着沉重复杂的心情写这篇检讨，但还是写得不好，只怪自己才疏学浅，不能更好的运用我们深厚的汉语言文化，敬请老师谅解。 为了感谢老师的淳淳教导，我一定会吸取这次教训，绝不让老师失望。请老师谅解我这一次的错误吧!

回顾一年的林林总总，本人得失兼有。下面我就这一年度自己的学习以及工作情况，谈谈自己的感受，剖析一下自身的进步和不足之处，让自己在今后的学习、工作和日常生活中不断铸炼自己，在各方面得到完善和进步。

一、思想方面

首先是思想方面。端正思想认识，认真学习领会十八大精神，在思想上同党中央保持高度一致。我对党有着无比浓厚的天生的好感，积极向党组织靠拢，并以极大的热情学习了党的基本理论知识，在思想上端正自己。在政治思想上，坚持四项基本原则，与党中央在政治上、思想上、行动上保持高度一致，拥护党的路线、方针、政策，坚定对共产主义的信仰，坚决抵制违背科学发展观的错误行为。实际工作中坚持理论联系实际，认真履行共产党员义务和用共产党员的标准规范自己言行，提高自身思想政治素质，更好的投身工作中。

二、工作方面

这一年来，我在日常工作中时刻牢记自己是一名共产党员，始终严格要求自己，遵守我公司的各项规章制度，力求时刻严格要求自己，踏实进取，认真谨慎，忠于职守、尽职尽责，能及时发现工作中出现的问题并提出自己的意见，努力发挥党员的先锋模范作用，以吃苦在前、享乐在后和对自己负责、对单位负责、对党负责的态度对待每一项工作，树立大局意识、服务意识、使命意识，努力把“全心全意为人民服务”的宗旨体现在每个细节中;以改进工作作风、讲求工作方法、注重工作效率、提高工作质量为目标，有条不紊地做好各项工作，努力起到表率作用，积极努力地完成了单位分配的各项工作任务。

三. 学习方面

这一年中我主动加强对政治理论知识的学习，积极配合支部组织、同时注重加强对外界时政的了解，通过学习，提高了自己的政治敏锐性和鉴别能力，坚定了立场，坚定了信念，在大是大非问题面前，能够始终保持清醒的头脑。不断改造自己的世界观、人生观和价值观，树立坚定的共产主义信念，使自己在思想上、行动上和党组织保持高度一致。一是学习方式上做到集中学习与自学相结合，二是学习内容上做到规定资料与网络资料相结合，三是学习方法上做到理论与实践相结合。作为新世纪的知识分子,我希望能够在有限的学习时间中掌握更多的知识, 以适应社会发展的需要,不断的提高自己的政治理论素质, 以适应社会经济发展的客观要求，更好地为人民服务。

四、 缺点与不足

在党组织的关心培养下，在同志们的热情帮助下及单位的领导和同事们的指导下，我认真学习、努力工作、政治思想觉悟都有了很大的提高，个人综合素质，有了全面的发展，得了一定的进步与提高。但我离一个优秀共产党员的标准和要求还有一定距离，自身也还存在一些不足。主要是理论学习的主动性还不够，工作缺乏主动性、创新性，有时侯和单位的同事沟通不够，会引起一些误解，专业知识的积累还不完善。对于自己的缺点与不足，我将在今后继续加以克服和改正。我相信在以后的工作学习中，我会在党组织的关怀下，在同志们的帮助下，通过自身的不断学习和进步，努力克服不足，更进一步改进工作作风，积极协助领导搞好工作，认真完成工作任务。今后，我会更加努力，认真学习，深入思考，勤奋工作，让自己的党性修养不断提高、认识不断 升华，为人民服务的本领不断增强，积极转变观念，开阔思路，努力向成为更高层次的专业人才方向发展。

我们作为领导，一定要给下属做好表率，千万要在工作各方面都注意，不然的话……还是先来看看出国留学网特意为大家准备的领导犯错万能检讨书，瞧瞧别人是怎么检讨的吧。

【领导犯错万能检讨书一】

尊敬的单位领导：

您好，在这里，我表达我对工作失职、疏于监管的无比愧疚心情。首先我作为一名局长，我的职责所在就是贯彻执行国家、省、市有关矿产资源管理的法律、法规和政策;组织制定全县土地资源管理配套政策措施，并组织实施和监督检查。

而我却在任职期间对于所辖范围内的土地资源疏于监测和监管，以至于在几年前当地的一些百姓在没有得到审批和没有办手续的情况下私自圈地建房，给当地的发展规划造成了一定程度的阻碍以及随之而来的一些麻烦

对于我在工作上的管理监督失职，我觉得很大程度上是由于我的主观方面疏忽，没有很好的履行职责所致。我这样的工作错误给领导以及整个当地国土资源局的工作形象上抹黑，造成的不良影响。

在此，我向领导同志表示深深地歉意。并郑重地向您说一句：非常抱歉，我错了!我此等的工作管理监督失职，是我工作以来这么长犯下的较为严重的错误。错误的发生，充分地说明我在思想上、政治意识上存在严重欠缺，在监管方面上存在严重疏忽，在工作上怠慢。 总而言之，我工作管理监督失职的原因种种，然我的工作管理监督失职已是不争事实，我并不想说说出种种缘由来掩盖我的错误。此次我这般工作管理监督失职，归根结底是我主观方面犯下的严重错误。

检讨人：

时间：

【领导犯错万能检讨书二】

尊敬的领导：

我怀着自责、反省和感激的心情写这份检讨书，在单位3年的日子里，这里留给我了很多成长的脚印，留给我了很多感动的画面，留给我了很多悔恨的泪水，更留给我了很多从做人到做事的经验和教训。看着自己到现在仍然保存被正熙酒店录用的短信，回想每一次谢总对我的教导、和同事一起并肩作战的情景，心中太多怀念和回忆以及对自己犯下错误的悔恨。

作为一名管理者，部门的管理好坏，部门员工的思想好坏和自己平时的努力、付出是分不开的。在从刚刚到正熙酒店的全心投入、认真工作到现在整个部门发生的事情，以及对酒店、对其他同事造成的影响，我是付有不可推卸的责任的。经过认真、仔细的反省，我认为在以下几点是我犯下的错误：

1、在自己对工作的用心以及投入上面。

任何一件事情，如果不全身心投入，就没有办法去做好，做人如此，做事也如此。对于自己的工作，对于酒店对我的信任、对于一个团队对我的信任，我没有把所有的心思都放在工作上，在思想上的松懈，导致了部门管理的松懈，导致了部门业务的监督不力。

2、在作为一名管理者与员工之间扮演角色上面。

作为一名管理者，应该分清自己在工作岗位上扮演的角色，认真履行自己的权利和职责，对于我来讲，一直以来对于员工，把生活和工作没有分开，过于的在乎感情，以错误的方式给予员工错误的人际关系概念。

3、在部门监管力度方面。作为一个部门经理，特别是作为酒店重要经营部门来讲，前台是有着大量现金和账务业务的部门，怎样从制度上约束员工，从业务上指导员工，通过不断的检查和复查，找出流程上存在的问题和预见可能发生的问题，是作为一个管理者必须要做和思考的事情。但是，在这点上面，我没有做到认真监督、努力去寻找及发现错误和漏洞，造成酒店的损失。

检讨人：

时间：

【领导犯错万能检讨书三】

尊敬的单位领导：

您好，我怀着无比愧疚和遗憾的心情向您递交这份工作失职的检讨书。关于我在电信机房管理工作中，因我个人的疏忽，工作的不到位，我没有能够细致地做完工程的所有进程，以至于让现场施工人员将0df机架的位置安装错误。

首先关于这项错误，我要做深刻地检讨，这是我工作上的最大疏忽、是工作失职。如今的我已是一名电信机房管理员，身处这个岗位我就应该深深意识自己所处岗位的作用，一名电信机房管理员是应该对电信机房所有施工作业做全程监督的，应该细心指导每个施工人员的具体工作，要对每一个环节都仔细分析。因为稍一放松就可以导致严重问题的出现，而一旦出现问题就会给公司、给集体带来严重的损失。

在此次的电信机房管理工作中，因为我个人的疏忽，没有监督好工人0df机架安装工作。但电缆线已安装好了，0df机架安装位置错误就需要重新移动，这样一来一回势必造成浪费，造成公司的损失。我对此表示深深的痛心和自责，此时此刻我的心情非常的不好，因此这项错误，我这段时间都不能够从中解脱出来。

出现问题，是谁都不愿意接受的现实。然而面对错误是需要很大勇气的，如今我已经鼓起了勇气去面对这项过错，我要用全部的精力投入到我下一步的工作当中。希望领导能够给我一次改过的机会，对于这项工作的错误，我也有一定自我认识，我还是一个电信机房管理新人，这是因为我经验不足造成的错误。但我不会以这个作为请求原谅的托词，因为错误终归是错误，我应该用于面对错误。 通过此次深刻的检讨，我深深地反思，我的犯错根本原因在于我个人的疏忽，没有全心、仔细的对待工作中的每一个环节，须知重要工作是容不得一点马虎的，我想我如何不很好的克服我工作疏忽这样缺点的话，我就会很难在工作岗位上有长远的发展。

针对我目前的错误，我决定用如下措施加以改正，也希望领导、同事们能够监督我，你们的一份监督就是对我的一份关心和重视。

1，针对我的工作责任感、工作失职，今后我要全身心投入工作，对于自己所辖职务做精心了解，对于每一个环节的施工都做好监督和管理。

2，今后我要像公司的优秀工作的同事学习，认真学习好的工作作风，从精神层面上提升我的工作理念，从根本上为我把今后的工作做好打基础。

通过此次深刻的检讨，请领导能够信任我。我今后一定认真努力地位公司做工作，为公司的发展献上自己微薄的一份力量。

检讨人：

时间：

【领导犯错万能检讨书四】

县委、县政府：

在20XX年8月2日省上“小金库”专项治理检查组对清源镇政府财务检查过程中，发现镇政府将部分拆迁补偿费和拆迁户购房款合计4096721.9元以私人名义单独存放，形成帐外资金。其中：支付拆迁补偿费2544011.84元，支付拆迁户安置房工程款1146400元，购置车辆、服装等其他指出374348.62元。截止目前，单位在私人账户存款余额31961.44元。以上问题被查出后，作为党委书记，对此深感震惊、愧疚和不安，近日来本人认真反思，深刻自剖，现检讨如下：

一、对问题严重性的认识

我镇发生如此严重违反财经纪律的问题，作为清源镇党委书记，我负有全部领导责任，我将认真配合上级相关部门的调查，诚恳接受组织的一切处理意见，并就相关问题扎实进行整改。

二、问题发生的根源

1、思想认识不到位。 本人担任乡镇主要领导以来，尤其是调任清源镇党委书记以来，由于多方面的原因，对单位财务管理工作重要性的认识不足，没有意识到问题的严重性，在全国上下全面整顿治理“小金库”严重形势下，自己认为财务管理是行政职能，是政府镇长的份内工作，不便过问，没有在思想认识上引起高度重视，在单位财务管理和运行上抱有十分可怕的侥幸心理和自以为是的想法。同时，由于自身财务管理知识缺乏，存在不贪便无过的错误想法，对会计账务没有引起高度重视。

2、工作衔接不到位。

作为单位一把手，对财务工作及管理人员疏于严格管理，亲自过问检查做的不到位。对人大、纪检等监督岗位的组织领导不到位，没有按照有关规定经常性组织督查、检查，监督职能没有充分发挥，致使政府财务基本在无监督的环境下运行;对财务主管及相关工作人员经常性督促、教育不够，致使管理人员财务知识匮乏，工作人员业务不精。

3、制度执行不到位。

单位虽然制定了财务审批制度、资金管理制度等相关规章制度，但在执行上严重存在软肋，有时由于工作紧迫，在资金运行、管理上没有严格按章办事，存在管理脱节、程序错位、制度形如虚设的问题。

三、整改落实的措施

1、提高认识，全面认真抓好整改。对省督查组查出的问题，我们完全认可，我完全接受县委常委会的处理意见，对常委会做出的处理结果利用3天时间，逐项全面落实。同时，积极抽调相关人员组成工作组，利用3-5天时间，对全镇财务全面进行自查自纠，并随时接受相关部门检查、验收。2、统一思想，认真做好当前各项工作。我将正视存在的问题，在全面抓好财经纪律整治的同时，认真组织抓好全镇当前各项中心工作。一方面，以此为契机，认真组织全镇广大干部，特别是领导干部，深入开展好财经纪律专项整治活动，通过各种形式开展财经知识教育、廉政教育和警示教育，提高干部综合素质。

另一方面，积极稳定干部情绪，引导干部客观看待问题，振奋精神，把心思和精力集中到当前各项工作上来，以更高要求和标准，抓好各项工作落实。

3、强化措施，积极建立健全财经管理的长效机制。通过上级部门检查，及时发现问题，对我来说是一次发现自身问题和不足以及改正错误的机会，我将认真吸取精要教训，认真弥补自己的过错。并以此为契机，创新思路，强化措施，完善各项规章制度，积极探索建立健全财经管理的长效工作机制，以努力争创一流工作业绩来回报组织对我的培养和信任。

总之，我的行为已经给清源镇带来了不好的影响，我的心情非常沉重和羞愧。相信组织给我一次机会，使我可以通过自己的行动来表示自己的觉醒，在今后的工作中，我会更加严格要求自己，加强学习，认真履行岗位职责，以加倍努力的工作来证明自己，恳请组织考验。

检讨人：

时间：

【领导犯错万能检讨书五】

尊敬的______：

几天来辗转反侧的愧疚与自问，促使我的内心感到极大的悔恨和自责，愧疚的是辜负了上级对我的殷切期望和谆谆教导，辜负了领导平时对我苦口婆心的良语诤言;我悔恨，悔恨的是在当前年终岁尾局工作头绪多、任务重，自己却牵扯了领导的精力;悔恨的是在全县上下社会稳定，经济发展形势一片大好，各项工作蒸蒸日上，自己却顶风违纪，弹出了一个极不和谐的音符。

作为深受党的教育多年的同志，问题反映出的政治敏感性、党性锻炼和工作能力的强弱是否符合当前的新形势、新要求?作为一名主要领导，自己是否具备了在其位、谋其政、负其责的信心与能力?答案是肯定的：忽视政治学习的重要，放松思想蔓延滋生，渐渐偏离正确世界观、忽视回避积重难返的问题、心存侥幸不积极不主动的工作态度……错误的出现看似一时，但暴露出来的问题却是发人深思，触目惊心的。

事情的经过是这样的，20__年__月__号____召开____传达会议，深入学习了《》等会议精神，____人进行了特别的强调，____还专门下发了______文件，我局还专开了会议进行了再部署再学习。我本人也学习了文件精神，对照自己的情况进行梳理，知道办公用房超标的问题，当时感觉，办公室是以前就建好的，现在如果改建装修，麻烦不说，还浪费钱财。所以就没把这个事当做急事进行急办。____日纪委来我局来专项检查核实，我才感到事情的严重性，____日我就按照要求进行腾出。现在回想事情发生的经过，本完全是可以避免的，但由于平时自身要求不严，以致在关键时候没能很好地把握住自己。事后经过上级领导的批评教育、同志们的帮助和自己的深刻反省，我更进一步地认识到这一违纪事件的严重性。这件事情的发生，看似偶然，实属必然，这与平时自身要求不严，作风松散，纪律松懈休威相关。痛定思痛，为了以后更好地工作，树立领导干部良好形象，我认真地剖析了所犯错误的原因：

一是平时不注重学习，政治敏感性差。我今天所犯的错误，我感到，主要就是平时对上级的指示精神学习不够、理解不深造成的。正如古书上有句话说的好：“贫学者，不空也泛，行必缪”。讲的就是一个人如果平时不善于学习，脑子里空空如野，也只能是泛泛而谈。其行为必将失之毫厘，缪以千里。

再回想自己平时对待学习的态度，总感到当领导多年，又经过组织的培养，什么法律法规、规章制度虽谈不上了如指掌，但对于每一项规定要求说上个八九不离十还是不成问题的，自己认为上级的指示精神年年差不多，没有必要再浪费时间去学习了，逐渐放松了平时对自身的严格要求，错失了学习新规定，适应新形势的良机，以致各种错误的思想趁机而入占据了头脑，影响了心态，放宽了言行，从而造成了在自己身上发生了本不应该发生的问题。 二是存在侥幸心理作怪，企图蒙混过关。

记得韩非子曾经说过“侥者，学必废，战必败，经必衰，”说的就是一个存在侥幸心理的人，学业必然枉废，作战必然失败，经商必然衰败。而侥幸心理，说到底说是一种赌徒的心态，赌徒偶尔也许会赢上一把，但更多的是输得血本无归。

再对照自己所犯的错误，感觉年年提超标超占这个问题，年年也没见真刀实枪的干过;总认为，以前有很多类似的情况，也没见有几个受到纪律的处罚;总认为，自己是身居领导的干部，上下关系都很熟悉，没人会在这个件事情上较真;总认为，虽然现在要求越来严，标准越来越高，腾出房子有一个过程，先等一等看一看再说;还认为，这么多单位，这么多领导，不可能就检查到自己头上吧，殊不知纪网恢恢，疏而不漏。 “要想人莫知，除非已莫为”，侥幸的心态本身就意味着可怕的后果。 三是组织纪律观念淡薄，自由主义思想严重。

以前在基层工作的时候，我都能遵守纪律规定，工作兢兢业业，做事谦虚谨慎，但随着年龄的增长和职务的升迁，自己逐渐的放松了以自己的要求，认为遵章守纪是基层的事，是职工的事，自己作为领导干部，平时干好自己的本职工作，适当放松一下要求、适当自由一点也算不了什么大事，自己能把握住，殊不知潜移默化中自由主义思想抬头，造成我这次出现问题，就是在这种错误思想的驱使下，对上级指示精神视而不见，对领导讲话充耳不闻，总觉得违章违纪的事与自己无关、跟自己无缘，从而对自己放松要求，事实证明，放松必然导致放纵。放纵也必然与会纪律格格不入，与纪律格格不入的自由也必然受到纪律的惩罚。

四是集体荣誉感不强，个人主义思想严重。“责任重于泰山，荣誉高于生命”，这是作为领导干部最起码的职业道德和行为准则。现在细细分析自己所犯的错误，在个人主义思想的影响下，在有损于荣誉感方面犯下了以下四个方面的错误：

一是执行规定不严格，落实指示不坚决，影响了集体正常工作秩序。县里办公用房是有明文规定的，领导干部本应模范带头、严格执行，但我却以个人利益为重，臵县里规章制度而不顾，顶风违纪，影响了局里一些正常工作的开展。

二是损害了领导干部的形象，单位的集体荣誉感不强。______局负责________，工作是大量的，也是谨慎细致的，在执行命令、严守规定上，应该为基层作出的模范表率，但我却为____摸了黑;三是职责意识淡化，牵涉了领导精力。

作为____干部，本应以对单位、对领导负责的态度，认真履行职责，高标准完成好上级交给的各项任务为己任，但我却以一时的糊涂，以自己愚蠢的行为，图自己方便，不顾事情的严重后果，为领导工作增添了不必要的麻烦，这是典型的对领导不负责的表现;四是摆位不正，自律意识不强，对自己成长进步不负责。

“大河无水小河干、大河有水小河满”阐述了个人与集体的关系，自己身为机关的一员，加强责任心，增强荣誉感在平时虽然也曾挂在嘴上记在心里，但在个人利益与集体利益发生冲突的关键时刻，却当责任如耳旁风，视荣誉如草芥，以自己的小利益凌驾于整体利益之上，这既是对单位不负责的表现，更重要的是对自己不负责。

著名哲学家黑格尔曾说过“对于你自己造成的耻辱，除了面对，别无它法”，后悔一次可贵，后悔二次可谅，后悔三次可悲，我深知，面对这次所犯错误，光有后悔是远远解决不了问题的，

因此我决心本着从哪儿跌到从哪儿爬起来的原则，放下包袱、轻装上阵，见微知著、防微杜渐。从头做起、从小事做起、从一点一滴做起，我保证在下一步工作中坚决做到：

一、加强学习，不断提高自身修养

理论是行为的向导，修养是理论的升华，反省这次事情经过，无不与自己的理论水平底，自身修养差有着直接的联系，我决心在下一步学习工作中，本着学习是为了武装自己的头脑而不是武装自己的嘴巴原则，向书本学，向他人学，向实践学，坚决做到理论与实践并重，技能与智能并重，做人与做事并重。努力做一个让县委领导放心，让基层满意的合格人员。

二、培养诚信的品质。

诚信是立身之本，在以后做人做事过程中，我一定诚字当头，做老实人，干老实事，不弄虚作假，不欺下瞒上，不断修正自己的人生坐标，树立正确的科学的人生观、世界观。正确处理好两个利益的关系，时刻把精力用在工作上，在工作中不断增强战胜自我的意志，团结同志，同甘共苦，用自身的实际行动，在当前全县各项发展蒸蒸日上的关键时期，贡献自己的一份力量。

三、认真落实法律法规，做遵章守纪模范。

在学习领会上级指示精神实质基础上，我一定以法规自己的一言一行，一举一动，内强素质、外树形象，做遵章守纪的模范。作为一名共产党员，在任何一个岗位上都体现着党的价值，维护党的良好形象。能力弱一点可以赶上来，形象差了可就没法改过来了，通过严格的自律和约束，把“形象重于生命”牢牢记在心头。

每一名党员都是一面旗臶，看你举的是红旗、黑旗还是白旗，群众的眼睛是雪亮的，他们在盯着你，在效仿着你。要时时刻刻严格要求自己，影响和带动身边的同志，自觉抵制各种腐朽思想的侵蚀，忠实的履行好上级赋予的权力，主动接受群众的监督，随时防止私欲膨胀和工作的急躁暴躁，按照职责要求把本职工作干好。

四、强化责任心，提升荣誉感。

一个没有责任心和荣誉感的人至少可以说不是一个完整的人。因此在以后工作中，加强自己的责任心和荣誉感，让自己的言行举止永远臵于集体之下、群众之中。

请县委和同志们看我的行动吧!

检讨人：

时间：

【领导犯错万能检讨书六】

尊敬的__________：

____________________期间，由于我管理失职，造成__________________违纪情况的发生。此事正值年终岁尾，各级对安全稳定工作都提出了较高的要求，我的失职直接影响了全营官兵一年来在安全稳定工作方面努力取得的成果，同时也给连队抹了黑，拖了连队全面建设的后腿。我怀着无比愧疚和遗憾的心情对此事进行了深刻反省，做检查如下：

一、违纪情况说明

______________________

二、问题的原因

(一)自己思想认识不到位。

一是安全发展理念树得不牢。不能正确认识安全工作贯穿始终的重要性，认为离年终没几天了，各级反复提的要求未免小题大做，嘴上说重要，抓起来次要，忙起来就不要。近期自己被线路施工，法规学习，训练预备期工作检查等事情牵涉了部分精力，在对待人员管理这个安全工作中的重中之重上却产生了放松。

二是忧患意识不够强。自己认为目前连队建设形势不错，盲目乐观，对安全管理的严峻形势认识不足，特点规律把握不够、隐患苗头不能及时发现。造成了偏听偏信，缺乏应有的分析判断。

(二)掌握官兵思想不够深入。

对官兵的现实思想和行为表现底数不清，有问题发现不了，抓教育切不中要害、抓不住关键。______同志因部队管理严格，心理觉得压抑。我对此思想毫不知情，更谈不上及时跟进做工作，导致其______________________________。这说明了连队目前的管理工作过于机械化，缺乏引导官兵对当前形势的正确认识，日常思想工作未能取得实效。

(三)安全管理不严格。

一是“两个以外管控”不力。

严在位不严在外，对在外人员管理严格、秩序正规，对出差执勤、探亲休假、生病在外人员管控不严、措施不力。今年我连发生的两起违纪事件，一是______________，二是________________。作为连队管理者，自己只顾管眼前，思维狭隘，认为人员出去后都有单位负责管理，自己提提要求，按时联系就不会发生问题。正是这种心态，使我对本来可以预见并及时发现的苗头隐患丧失了基本的敏感性。

二是管理工作不全面。

平时对后进个人、个别人了解多、关注多，对老实听话、所谓放心人的掌握模模糊糊、若明若暗，存在管理死角和盲区。认为________平时工作表现不错，为人老实，又是副班长，应该能够管好自己，所以对其过度放心，偏听偏信，不调查核实，这是导致该同志____________的重要原因。

三是安全隐患排解不力。

________违纪事件发生在我营四季度安全形势分析会议期间，我在组织召开连队安全形势分析时，对连队管理形势认识不到位，问题隐患分析不全面，错过了将问题解决在萌芽的最佳时机，导致了违纪事件的发生。

正是由于我自己思想认识的不到位，管理上的失职，造成了我连一名家庭极其困难，一贯表现良好，长期在高原默默工作的战士触碰了纪律的高压线，受到了行政处分，甚至被调离连队。在给单位荣誉抹黑的同时，也使该同志的成长进步受到了极大影响，为他原本困难的家庭加重了负担。作为连队管理的第一责任人，我不仅愧对各级首长对我的信任和关怀，更对把儿子的成长进步希望放心交到部队的战士父母感到内疚。经过认真反思，我充分认识到了自己失职的严重后果，也对自己的工作进行反省，端正了认识。

三、几点反思和下一步打算

(一)部队管理是一项全局性、基础性、长期性的工作，贯穿于日常工作的各个领域、各个环节。如果在长期抓、抓长期上做得不够，缺乏动态观念，把过去抓得好等同于现在抓得好，现在不出事等同于将来不出事，那么出事是必然，出问题是迟早。

(二)管好部队、带好兵，是考验干部骨干责任心和能力素质的第一道关口。单位再小，人再少，管理不到位的危害也不可小视。班、排、连，建制虽小，但都是军队建设的最基本组成部分，地位特殊，责任重大，抓管理促正规保安全的意识必不可少。作为管理者，“他人安全我有责”并不是一句口号，若平时纵容迁就，不闻不问，对被管理者来说不仅不是关心，反而是祸害。轻则影响个人成长进步，重则影响单位全面建设。

(三)管理工作无时不有、无处不在，没有“淡季”、“旺季”之分，只有全时抓，从严抓，才能常太平。基层有一种说法：年初出事，白干一年;年尾出事，一年白干。可见，一旦出问题必将对单位造成严重影响。但对于我们战士个人来说，不论什么时候出事，那影响的不仅是一年两年，严重的可能影响一个家庭，影响自己一生。所以，不论从哪个角度，都容不得我们管理者有任何疏忽。否则，危害的将是集体和我们的战士的利益。

(四)落实制度，从严管理就是对战士的最大关爱。一道规章制度就是一道防线，遵守规章制度可能麻烦多一些，自由少一点，但他可以保证战士的成长进步，保证战士的安全。在落实制度上要坚持高标准，不放松，不放宽尺度，不搞下不为例。对违反制度规定的，哪怕没酿成后果也要严肃批评和处理，以儆效尤。通过________违纪一事，让我更加清醒的认识到：对单位和个人最大的负责任就是严格管理，严格要求。________同志违纪所受到的严厉处理，对他本人及全体战士也是一个负责任的交代。违规处罚不留情，看似无情最有情。

感谢营党委对我的批评教育和帮带，使我充分认识到了自己管理失职的严重后果，也进一步认清了自己担负责任的重大。在这里，也向全营官兵道个歉，希望大家原谅。同时

也向营党委保证，在今后的工作中，进一步加强责任心，兢兢业业干好本职工作，带领连队以更高的标准，更优异的成绩回报组织的信任和同志们的关心。

检讨人：

时间：

【领导犯错万能检讨书七】

县、市两级各位主管领导：

在20XX年6月17日中考专项治理噪音超音巡查过程中，我项目部未全部停工噪音超标被查出，作为项目负责人，对此深感震惊、愧疚和不安，近日来本人认真反思，深刻自剖，现检讨如下：

一、对问题严重性的认识不够

我项目发生如此严重违反噪音管理规定的问题，作为卓越明郡主要负责人，我负有全部领导责任，我将认真配合上级相关部门的调查，诚恳接受上级领导的一切处理意见，并就相关问题进行反思。

二、问题发生的根源

1、思想认识不到位。本人担任项目负责人以来，由于多方面的原因，对项目噪音管理工作重要性的认识不足，没有意识到问题的严重性，在全国上下全面整治中考期间噪音超标形势下，在思想认识上没有引起高度重视，在管理和运行上抱有十分可怕的侥幸心理的想法。同时，由于自身对工地管理知识缺乏，造成现在的违规行为。

2、工作衔接不到位。作为项目一把手，对工作及管理人员疏于严格管理，没有亲自过问检查做的到不到位，没有按照有关规定经常性组织督查、检查。监督职能没有充分发挥，致使工地有无人开工心里没数;致使管理人员一盘散沙，造成现在的结果。

3、制度执行不到位。一项新任务下来，项目虽然制定了制度，但在执行上严重存在软肋，有时由于工作紧迫，在工作运行、管理上没有严格按章办事，存在管理脱节、程序错位、制度形如同虚设，造成今日的局面。

三、落实的措施

1、提高认识，全面认真抓好以后上级部门下达的任务。

对上级查出的问题，我们完全认可，完全接受上级的处理意见，对上级领导做出的处理结果逐项全面落实。避免类似问题再次发生。

2、统一思想。

我将正视存在的问题，在全面抓好纪律整治的同时，认真组织抓好当前各项中心工作。并以此为契机，认真组织管理人员思想教育，提高管理人员综合素质。

3、强化措施，积极建立健全管理机制。

通过上级部门检查，及时发现问题，对我来说是一次发现自身问题和不足以及改正错误的机会，我将认真吸取教训，认真弥补自己的过错。并以此为契机，创新思路，强化措施，完善各项规章制度，积极探索建立健全管理的长效工作机制，以努力争创一流工作业绩来回报上级领导对我的信任。

总之，我的行为已经给沾益县带来了不好的影响，我的心情非常沉重和羞愧。相信上级领导给我和项目一次机会，使我可以通过自己的行动来表示自己的觉醒，在今后的工作中，我会更加严格要求自己，加强学习，认真履行岗位职责，以加倍努力的工作来证明自己，恳请上级领导考验。

检讨人：

时间：