检检讨书分几个部分精选20篇

尊敬的部长大人： 今天，为表示我的深刻反省，我怀着无比愧疚的心情写下这封检讨书，以向您表示我对我自己在IT文化节宣传工作上不尽人意的表现的深刻认识，以及保证在以后的工作中，尽自己最大的努力，做到最好。 这是一次十分...补报，并说明漏报原因。

中国共产党党员领导干部廉洁从政若干准则 为进一步促进党员领导干部廉洁从政，根据《中国共产党章程》，结合党员领导干部廉洁自律工作实际，制定本准则。 总则 执政党的党风关系党的生死存亡。坚决惩治和有效预防腐败，是党必须始终抓好的重大政...

当然得做出相应的赏罚措施，当然，也要自己以身作则. 毕竟，的确是你的疏忽，才会让人犯错~~~~ 应该反思一下 1、用人问题上 2、赏罚问题 3、今后的雷同事件处理 下面是对检讨的一些认识： 我错了，随着21世纪时期的到来，许多历史痕迹都将逐渐...

一、依靠群众，方便群众，实行专门工作与群众路线相结合。依靠群众，就是要相信群众，深入调查研究，发动群众举报，提供证实犯罪的情况。只有依靠群众，才能获取众多的案件线索，准确地查明案件事实，正确运用法律，惩罚犯罪，保护人民。只有依...

个人漏报事项情况说明

补报，并说明漏报原因。

就严重影响个人的诚性度.

尊敬的XXX:

我XXX，在X年X月X日，私自使用手机。被XX发现。事情的经过是这样的(自己写个百把字)。

事后我才知道事情的严重性，我的所做所为已经严重违反了部队条令条理的规定，事后我也非常后悔。不仅影响了连队的声誉，还牵扯了上级领导的精力。在这，我向连(营)首长道歉。(鞠躬要诚恳)，我所犯下的是不可原谅的错误，但我希望连(营)首长能给我一次改过字新的机会。犯下如此大货主要是因为条令条理学习不严谨，侥幸心理严重，总是想着偷着用不会被抓住。重来没考虑过事情的严重性，没想过这会影响连(营)队的发展。事后我也查阅了很多有关条令条例。具体如下，是给自己的一次反省，避免再次犯错，同时也给战友们敲响一次警钟。希望不要犯类似的错误，具体条例如下:

20XX年根据新修改的中国人民解放军《内务条令》、《纪律条令》规定，“除工作需要并经师(旅)以上单位首长批准外，军人不得使用移动电话、寻呼机等通信工具。”“经批准持有移动电话、寻呼机的军人，严禁将移动电话带入作战室、情报室、机要室、通信枢纽、涉密会场、军用飞机和舰船、重要仓库、导弹发射阵地等场所;在设有有线通信工具的场所工作时，不得使用移动电话办理公务。严禁使用移动电话、寻呼机谈论、传送涉密信息。军队开设的寻呼台不得发送涉密信息。”这种规定也是由于防止在高科技环境下手机泄漏军事机密的情况发生。我看过一片报道上说，手机即使处于关机状态下，运用高科技的方法也是能够窃听到手机通话的。

我保证以后一定不会再玩手机，望同志们引以为戒!

XXX

年月日

我感觉我这次英语考试的分数是很低的，这远远没有达到我心目当中的一份理想成绩。然而，考试成绩实实在在地公布出来了，我考得不好是板上钉钉，铁一般的事实，不容我丝毫推脱。考试成绩不好，只能够说明我对这一科目的知识掌握得不够深透与全面。

成绩考差以后，我倍感苦恼，经过这一段时间的深刻反省。我总结出了造成这次考试失利的原因：

1，平时不注意英语知识的专研，也可以说是我对于英语这门科目的学习不够重视。2，日常没有抽出足够的时间来完成英语作业，很多时候是没有时间留给英语作业的。3，有时候自己也上课开小差，对于一些知识点没有细致、准确地掌握。

现在我考试已然失利，我痛苦难当，我也很懊悔。可是我也知道再多的言辞都显得苍白无力，我只有勇敢地面对目前形势，集中精力、时间、条件用于提高自身学习成绩，在下一次大考当中取得优秀的英语成绩才是给老师最好的交待。

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

尊敬的老师：

您好!

今天期中试卷语文、数学、英语一发下来，我的头皮一阵发麻。心里想：妈妈给我的标准是这三门最低分只能考95分!而我这个不争气的人啊,就连一门都没考95分，回家后也不知道遭到怎样的惩罚。我的心里像有十五个吊桶一样七上八下的。真是难受极了!

这次语文考试没考好，我自己总节了以下几点：

1、在考试前两天，应该认真复习，不应该贪玩。

2、以后在家要多做阅读题。

3、以后上课要认真听讲，不要注意力分散。

4、在家要多读作文书，考试时作文可以少减分。

5、比如说：挨(ai一声 ai二声)应该选二声，一声挨是我们的口头语，二声挨是正确读音。这些都要分清楚。

这次数学没考好，我自己又总结了以下几点：

1、以后基础知识要学好，不要在这种题上丢分。

2、在口算、笔算的方面，以后不能有错题。

3、在考试的时候要读懂题目。

4、有不会的题，在考试之前有问一问别人。

5、遇到附加题的时候要多动脑。

这次英语没达到目的，我还总结了以下几点：

1、在听读方面要多下功夫，学过去的知识要牢牢记住。不能今天会读了，明天又忘了。

2、学过去的英语的小片段要背熟，不能背得结结巴巴。

3、每一单元的词语要会写，停歇的时候要全对。

做好了这几点，不论时间多少，多少卷子，只要做得又快又好，绝对能考优+。 在下一次考试中,我一定会尽自己最大的努力做到最好.，以我的实际行动来表明我的决心。

时光飞逝，一年一度的期末考试有一次落下了帷幕。在这每一次的人生考验中，总是有人欢喜有人悲。然而不幸的是这一次我成为了后者。半载的辛苦和辛酸苦累换来了的却是失落，让我怀着失落的心情，带着差强人意的成绩，为这个学期画下了一个败笔。原因出在哪里，我做出了深刻思考和反省，经过了深思熟虑，特作出深刻的检讨，有些没有提到之处还请老师和同学们提出批评指正。

我认为此次考试的失利，绝不是一日之工，“冰冻三尺，非一日之寒。”确实，我总结了以下几点：

1、思想觉悟不够深刻。思想觉悟是一个学生具有的基本条件，一个学生的基本任务是什么，就是学习，好好学习。一个正确的思想觉悟会带领我们走向正轨，所谓思想不过关，成绩如何过关。不仅仅是学习，做任何事思想觉悟都是最重要的，也是最关键的。

2、没有端正的学习态度。态度跟思想是相辅相成的。一个正确认真的学习态度是一个学生成才的必备基础，有了正确的思想态度才能正确的对待学习这件事，正确看待考试成绩的重要性，考试是学校对于学生的检测，也是让自己找出不足改正不足的方法，也是学校对学生的一种负责的态度。

3、基本功的不扎实。平时的一个小小的东西都会影响到考试成绩，这是不可否认的。一个字母的背记，每一次简单的验算，每一次刻苦的思考，都是很重要的，我就是没有打下良好的基础，而导致考试成绩的不理想。

4、平时对自己要求过低。有时候人会犯“惰性”，也就是偷个小懒，每个人都有这种惰性，重要的是有的人克制的较好，有的人克制的较差。平时对自己严格要求的人，做什么事情都会对自己严格要求，对待学习更要严格要求。

5、没有一个正确的学习目标。每一个阶段都给自己制定一个小目标的人，往往平时不怎么起眼，到了考试就会大放光彩，因为他完成一个个小目标，从而最终完成一个大目标。然而光有目标没有实际行动也是不行的，一步一个脚印的踏实度过每个目标，你会发现你成功了一大步。正所谓“不积跬步，无以至千里;不积小流，无以成江海”。古人的话都是有道理的。

6、缺乏一定的自信心。人无聪明愚蠢之分，都是平等的，一个人要相信自己可以完成，付出努力就会成功，一个人要是缺乏了自信心，不敢去尝试，不管是学习还是工作都无法成功。俗话说“人不可有傲气，但不可无傲骨”。傲骨指的是什么，就是自尊和自信。

7、缺少“不耻下问”的精神。有时候感觉问问题很丢面子，这是大错特错的。我们都是学生，我们都是来向人家学习的，学习就有不懂的，不懂的就得向别人请教，这是很正常的现象，然而我一直曲解这里的意思。子曰：“三人行，必有我师焉”。每个人都有自己的缺点，每个人也有自己的优点，学习别人的优点，弥补自己的缺点。比如你的数学好，我的语文好，我们就可以互相学习，相互学习，这样同时提高的是双方，也是双倍的。

8、没有一个良好的学习习惯。习惯成自然，一个正确的学习习惯关系着一个人的一生。有的人喜欢给英文备注，其实这也不失为是一种好办法，久而久之就形成习惯，一看到这个单词就能想起自己的备注，这样对于背记有很大的提高。还有人的验算本比有的人的作业本都整洁，这都是好的学习习惯，就算题做错了，回头找找看看自己的验算本，一目了然，知道哪里错了。弄得乱七八糟，自己永远不知道怎么回事。

敬的级长x老师、班主任x老师：

您们好!

我在深深的愧疚和不安中度过了漫长的三天，回想起自己进入高中阶段以来的学习和生活，自己这次的犯错并不是偶然的，是长期以来对自己要求不严格，随意放纵自己，自控能力差的必然结果。在这里我要对关心和爱护我的学校老师、爸爸和妈妈说一声对不起，我错了，我辜负了您们为了我成长所付出的辛劳和情感。

自开学以来学校就三令五申，一再强调校规校纪，提醒学生不要违反校规，爸爸妈妈也经常跟我说“做人做事要认真，无论任何时候都要按规定办，不然麻烦事会不断的缠着你”，可我却并没有把学校规定和老师、爸爸妈妈的话放在心上，总是放任自己，我行我素，时不时做一些违规的事，比如在宿舍不认真整理被子、熄火后讲话、上课不认真听讲、不认真按时完成作业等等，mp3，智能手机是学校禁止带回学校的，爸爸妈妈也提醒过我，但是我却一意孤行，坚持要带回学校，而且熄灯以后还听歌，更不应该的是，在受到老师批评教育之后相隔一天，晚上熄灯后又跟同学在宿舍讲话，这就是错上加错，这些严重的过错，不但给自己造成困扰也影响了同学，给班级抹黑也破坏了学校正常的秩序，所以学校和老师对我的处理是我违反校规应得的，我诚恳的接受。

通过这三天的深刻反省，我醒悟了很多，似乎找到了自己为什么总是状态不好，成绩跟不上去的原因，自己纪律散漫、心思不正，目标不明，麻麻木木地度日是主要原因，假如再这样下去，我失去的东西将会越来越多，包括自己的欢笑，甚至虚度三年的青春。

当我写这份检讨，老师和爸爸妈妈反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我感到很愧对您们，我不求您们的原谅，我要把它当成一个警钟，时刻敲响在脑际，监督我成长中的每一步，我要吸取教训，让它成为我今后学习和生活的动力，为此我保证：今后一定严格要求自己，遵守校规校纪，听老师的话，类似的错误不重犯，不把这次的犯错当成包袱;努力克服不足，抖擞精神投入到下一步的学习生活，不迟到，不早退，上课认真听讲，课后按时、按质、按量完成作业，努力提高学习成绩;维护班级形象，不给班级抹黑，为班级争取荣誉;努力争取做一名优秀学生。

检讨虽然是诚意的，但也只是停留纸上，行动才是最主要的，我恳请老师和爸爸妈妈，给予我今后的学习和生活更严格的监督，我会以实际行动回报您们对我的关怀和爱护，绝对不辜负你们的辛劳和期望。

学生：xxx

尊敬的杜老师：

首先我为今天上午犯下的错误深刻的悔过，今天早上由于自己的懒惰，就缺席了1-2节的中国经典文学，在班里面造成了严重的影响，经过老师的教导，我知道了自己错误之所在，为自己的行为感到了深深地愧疚和不安，早在我刚踏进这个学校的时候，学校以及学院就已经三令五申，一再强调，作为一个大学的学生，上课不应该迟到，不应该旷课。然而现在，我却旷课了。

老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我深为震撼，也已经深刻认识到此事的重要性，于是我一再告诉自己要把此事当成头等大事来抓，不能辜负老师对我们的一片苦心，但是，在实际的生活中，由于个人的惰性，我还是把老师的谆谆教诲抛于脑后。今天写下这份检讨书，不仅是因为一个学校纪律处理的程序需要，更确切的来说，是想通过这份检讨，来让自己牢记老师们的教诲，更让自己时刻敲响警钟!

我不想找任何的理由来为自己开脱，因为错了，就是错了，找理由来逃避，只会使自己越陷越深。推卸责任容易变成一种习惯，而这种习惯养成了就难以去改变了。旷课，不是一件小事。杜老师找我谈话的时候，我感到很愧对老师，更愧对我的家人。进大学的以后，什么都觉得很新鲜，觉得自己有股冲劲，这个世界上就没有自己干不成的事情，于是在生活学习中，对自己要求不严格，随意放纵自己。像墙头的野草，风往哪面就想哪边倒，一段时间对什么有兴趣觉得有意思就去忙乎什么，干事情总是三分钟的热度，连最重要的学习都落下了，纪律也散漫了。这种状态一直持续着，我现在都大二了，直到现在我才感觉自己清醒了些。现在，本在申请灾区减免学费的我本应该对自己更加严格的时候，我却堕落起来，为此我感到十分的羞愧，因为这样的错误是愚蠢的。毕竟，想得到这些帮助是需要自己努力的，需要的是一个品学兼优的学生，所以我为此深刻检讨自己。

由于以前也发生过此类状况，受到了老师的批评，所以这些心里十分的难受，觉得辜负了老师对自己的谆谆教导，浪费了老师的精力和时间，我实在是不该，但是这次老师却没有对我发火，并且耐心的劝说我，使我深刻地反省自己的错误，我觉得非常愧疚，此次的反省尤为深刻，使我觉得改正错误是件刻不容缓的事情，经过几个小时的深思，我决定以以下的行为向老师表达自己认错的决心：

1、向老师认错，写检查书。既然自己已经犯了错，我就应该去面对，要认识到自己的错误，避免以后犯同样的错误。

2、提高纪律性。我应该认真学习学校的校规校纪，并且做到自觉遵守。不迟到，不早退，不旷课。有事应该先向老师请假。

3.提高自己的思想觉悟。对各门课程都应该引起重视，并且要养成良好的学习和生活作风。

4.‘学会正确处理问题。以后遇到事情需要冷静的处理，凡事需要三思而后行，多角度的权衡利弊，不能再像以前一样冲动行事，这一点对于自己无论是做人，还是做事都是很重要的。对于自己以前所犯的错误，我已经深刻的认识到了它的严重性，特写下这篇检讨，让老师提出批评，并希望得到老师的原谅。并且向老师保证我以后将不会再犯以上的错误，特别是不会再无故旷课了。希望老师能够给我一次改正的机会，并且真心的接受老师的批评和教诲。同时希望老师在往后的时光里能够监督我，提醒我。我一定不会再让老师失望了。

5、 制定学习计划，认真克服生活懒散、粗心大意的缺点，努力将期考考好，以好成绩来弥补我的过错。

我不想像许多人那样写虚伪的检讨，检讨只是一份死物，改正错误不是靠写检讨，而是靠实际行动!只有真真切切认识到自己的错误，才能改正错误。任何事情都有一个过程，改正错误也有一个过程，而这份检讨将是我的一个监督，一个警钟，监督我一步一步踏踏实实地改正所犯的错误!同时真心希望老师给我机会，能够理解我。不要因为这次我的错误再给我一次处分，因为我一定用自己的行动来证明自己的觉醒，绝对不辜负你们的一片苦心!

此致敬礼

检讨人：

2011年5月

工作失误检讨书(一)

尊敬的班主任：

首先由于我的工作不认真的原因，没有把工作做好出现了不应该的失误，再此我做出深刻检讨!

当天由于时间比较紧张，由于我工作的马虎大意，忘记了本应该开会解决的事而独自一人做主了!导致事后的一系列事件，还在同学中引起了不好的影响。

经过老师的批评和教育后我发现，造成此时的主要原因，主要是我责任心不强。通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，工作作风涣散的必然结果。自己身为团支部书记，应该严以律已，对自己严格要求!增强自身的工作态度，避免在工作上的随意性。然而自己却不能好好的约束自己，我对自己的工作没有足够的责任心，也没有把自己的工作更加做好。在自己的工作态度中，仍就存在得过且过，混日子的应付想法。现在，我深深感到，这是一个非常不好的想法，如果继续放任自己继续放纵和发展，那么，后果是极其严重的，甚至都无法想象会发生怎样的工作失误。因此，通过这件事，我感觉到自己的不足，所以，在此，我在向老师和同学们做出检讨。

我向老师做出深刻检讨，并保证：

1，在这件事中，我感到自己在工作责任心上仍就非常欠缺。加强自己的工作责任心和工作态度。认真克服工作懒散、粗心大意的缺点，努力将工作做好，以优异工作成绩来弥补我的过错。

2，以后工作中认真履行岗位职责，增强与同学的交流，认真做好职责范围内和领导交办的工作任务，要积极表现，多和同学、老师配合以自己的行动来表示自己的觉醒，以加倍努力的工作来为班级做出积极的贡献

3，由于个人工作疏忽，带来了麻烦，影响班级的形象，以后要积极改正亡羊补牢。

4，对于这一切我还将进一步深入总结，深刻反省，改正错误，把今后的事情加倍努力干好。我已经意识到我的错误了，而且认识到了此次错误严重性。我知道我确实是太马虎大意了。我保证今后不会再有类似行为发生在我身上。请老师继续监督、帮助我改正缺点，使我取得更大的进步!我在此进行了十分深刻的反思和检讨。

20011级经济2班

白相泽

2012年3月19日

工作失误检讨书(二)

尊敬的XX领导：

8月14日，XXX部长在《XX部关于XXX的报告》一文中指出两处错误，并批示：“核稿要认真!”这两处错误完全是由于我个人的疏忽大意造成的，给XXX司造成了非常不良的影响。几天来，我为自己的失误感到深深地不安和愧疚，经过认真反思，深刻自剖，现将有关情况和我的思想反思结果汇报如下：

8月13日，我将上述报告的初稿送至办公厅XX处核稿，XX处的同事及时纠正了文中的一处错误，在第5页中，序号“五”应改为“四”。当我拿回办公室清稿时，粗心大意之下将第3页的序号“五”改成了“四”，并且之后完全没有再次核对。这样一来，不但原先的错误没有改正，更增添了一处错误，并将错误文稿直接呈送部领导签发。

这份报告是报送国务院XXX与XXX的文件，关系到整个XX部的工作水平和作风，如果真的按照错误版本报送给国务院领导，将会造成无法弥补的后果。

在此，我郑重地向部领导、办公厅检讨的同时，更要向XX司的各位领导和同事道歉。作为去年才入部工作的新人，一年多来，我熟悉了各项工作流程，工作逐步迈向正轨，却在这个时候工作作风涣散，对自己放松了要求，犯下了最不应该犯的错误，愧对各位领导对我的教导和信任。痛定思痛，经过这件事之后，我相信我一定会从中吸取教训，把认真、严谨、务实的工作作风摆在首位，端正态度，增强责任心，加倍努力工作，也请各位领导和同事对我继续进行监督、鞭策和鼓励!

工作失误检讨书(三)

尊敬的领导：

您好!我已深深的认识到自己的错误.

我的错误来源于意识上的淡薄和思想上的麻痹，确切的说还是自己不够认真，才会导致这件事情的发生。由于我的失误给公司带来了损失我深表歉意，通过这件事情我真正领悟到了自己的缺陷和不足，明白了以后如何改进，因为做事不认真，自己尝到了自己种下的苦果还连累到公司，使公司在经济和名誉上受到严重的损坏，这是用金钱赔偿不来的，但是事因我起，我愿承担责任，凭我一人的力量不能给公司带来明显的受益，但是在这个集体中每个人都起到重要的作用，我现在明白了，一个人的力量的渺小的，但是一个人因为不认真导致的事故，是重大的，因为以前意识不够，做事马虎，今后我会认认真真做好工作上的每一件事，尽到我自己应有的责任，为公司贡献我的力量。

通过这件事让我深刻的理解到“安全来自警惕、事故处于麻痹”的含义，我深刻的检讨自己，这件事虽然不是安全上的事故，却也是自己麻痹造成的;这件事由我造成的我愿接受领导的处罚!同时我深表决心会更加的严谨、认真热爱、立足本职岗位、爱岗敬业为公司美好的明天做出自己应有的贡献!!

工作失误检讨书(四)

在杨柳综合楼(二)幕墙装饰材料的监管中，由于个人疏忽，我没能全面的对所封样材料样品进行准确无误，认真核实、查对后给您再次汇报确认。犯了一个最低级、最原则性的错误，把基本的白色都没能按您的要求做好，给公司的工程进度造成了不良影响和一定的损失，同时也愧对陈总对我的信任。通过此事我也在自我反思一定要把犯错误的根本原因找出来，若是找不到根本原因所在，敷衍了事，也许将来还会犯更多更严重的错误。反思后，归结原因如下：

1、责任心不强，工作作风不深入，不踏实。作为一名材料部负责人，不论有多少事去处理，都应该有一个清晰的头绪和严谨的工作态度。同时，更是要增强自身的学习和业务水平，牢记工作上细节性。一个人一生最重要的是做事做人的能力。做人要专注，做事也要专注。做事不专心，一定无法把事情做得圆满，无法清楚地掌握细节。

2、做事情一定要严格要求自己，做到认真负责，勤学多问能真正领会领导安排工作的意图，不能偏差千里，对领导安排的各项工作有始有终。做好自己的本职工作，能从工作中、业务中学更多的智慧，自己要不断提高业务及其他综合水平。

因此，我请求陈总对我处罚，无论陈总怎样从严从重处罚我，我都不会有任何意见。同时，我请求陈总再给我机会，使我可以通过自己的行动来表示自己的反省，在今后的工作中，我会更加努力。

工作失误检讨书(五)

王世鹏(化名)同志的意见很好。我希望把他的信和我的初步检查，都在报上公开发表，以教育更多的新闻工作者。

1月下旬，我到滇南采访，23日得知沙甸军民要在除夕开联欢会。我了解了有关内容，在24日(除夕)晚饭前写成初稿，因为沙甸无法发稿，加上我要去县城完成另一采访任务，便离开了沙甸，行前我嘱托驻地部队的新闻干事李文义同志到时候去参加晚会，并且约定，如果不该原计划进行，一定要在晚11时前给我打电话。当晚，李文义同志没有打电话，我就把稿子发往报社了。看到王世鹏同志的来信，才知道报道有误。

经查，当晚张子仁阿甸因病重，不能到会讲话，是由公社宣传干事代讲的，沙甸的演出队没有按原计划演出，是因为群众要求早日看电影。李文义同志因为爱人来部队探亲，他也没有应约去晚会现常这就造成了报道在重要情节上的失实。

造成失误的原因，主要是我责任心不强，采访作风不深入，不踏实。作为一个记者，不论有多少理由，都应亲临第一线，掌握第一手材料，确保事实无误;尤其是事前草拟了稿子，发稿时更应认真核实。我没做到这一点，却去采访另—篇报道，盲目追求发稿数量，这就必然顾彼失此。

这篇报道失实，我的心情非常沉痛。我感谢王世鹏同志的批评，一定认真吸取教训，避免今后发生类似的错误。

工作失误检讨书(六)

尊敬的领导:

于xxxx回标时，由于个人疏忽，在招标办主持人宣布回标截止后，方才进入会场回标，致使我公司此次投标未被接收，给公司造成了一定的经济损失和不良影响，同时让公司领导、业务部、技术部同仁的心血全部付之东流，在此我首先向大家说声抱歉，真的对不住大家!其次，在今后的工作中，我将加倍努力，希望能弥补此次失误给公司造成的经济损失和我愧疚的心灵!

同时这件事深深地警醒了我:做事情一定要严格要求自己，做到认真负责，有始有终，做足百分百，绝不能完成百分之九十九就松懈，放弃，而因为最后的百分之一满盘皆输，正所谓:失之毫厘，谬以千里.我同时也希望大家一起，深刻吸取此次泪的教训，引以为戒，杜绝此类事件在今后的工作中发生!

最后我要感谢这次失败的投标经历，感谢这份自我检讨书，给了我一次改正坏习惯的机会，从而使我向成功迈进了一步。

工作失误检讨书(七)

尊敬的领导同志：

您好，我怀着无比愧疚和遗憾的心情向您递交这份工作失职的检讨书。关于在杭州下沙物美超市的综合楼建设项目的监督工作中，因我个人的疏忽，我没有能够充分地对工程全部材料的样本可实品做样品检查。没有认真核查账本，也没有在检查之后向您如实汇报。

我可以说是犯了一个最低级，最原则性的错误。我有罪啊，连这么基础的工作都没有做好，没有根据您的要求，把项目的进展情况着实地向了领导汇报。给公司造成了很大的负面影响，也导致了一些损失，同时也愧疚陈总对我的信任和关照。

但此次我通过自我反省，必须找出我工作失误的根本原因，我反思了一下。我犯错的根本原因在于，我自身这个马虎的性格，做事半心半意，敷衍了事。我知道这样的工作作风是极度危险的，这样的作风持续下去。很可能在未来造成更多更严重的错误。

针对我的错误，我反省了如下几点改正措施：

1，针对我的责任感不强，工作作风懒散，不实际。我深刻认识到作为一名材料部的负责人，我对很多事情应该亲自过问，不论处理的好坏，都应该给上级一个明确的汇报和交代。出来端正态度，认真工作之外，我也要抽出空闲时间提高自己的学习和专业水平，同时保持工作的细节。

2，我今后做事情必须严格要求自己，做一个认真负责，勤奋的工作人员。我要时时认真的了解组织领导的意图，不能将领导的意思偏之千里，要将自己的工作做好做精。

通过此次深刻的检讨，请陈总信任我。我今后一定认真努力地位公司做工作，为公司的发展献上自己微薄的一份力量。

检讨人：王思敏(化名)

工作失误检讨书(八)

我因为在工作的时候打电话破坏了工司的正常秩序，我感到非常后悔，之前的我会犯这种错误，完全是因为不认真，没有调整好自己的工作态度，思想认识还未到位，一时的错误，它令我懊悔不已!但是这个处罚给我敲响了警钟，我幡然醒悟，理解到无规矩不成方圆，犯了错误就要受到处罚，所以处罚下达以后，我没有怨天尤人，而是潜心从自己身上找错误，查不足，经过一段时间深刻的反醒，我对自己犯的错误感到后悔莫及。

我没有一点悲伤的接受了上司的处罚-----反省一天，这一天我明确了自己的错误，在静静的思考后我明白了一个道理，我的行为是不对的!!!!

思想上，我重新检讨自己，坚持从认识上，从观念上转变，要求上进，关心集体，关心他人，多和优秀同事接触，交流。

纪律上，现在我一定要比以前要有了很大改变，现在的我对自己的言行，始终保持严格的约束，不但能遵守公司的纪律，更加懂得了身为一名职工哪些是可以做的，哪些是不可以做的。

学习上，我可以不避困难，自始至终为掌握更多知识，使自己的素质全面得到提升,为公司做更多事!

我想再对我的行为做一个检讨，我打电话是不对的，同时还影响了同事们，大家在同时看着我的时候我的感觉也是痛苦的，同事们有的惊吓，有的愤怒，有的嬉笑，我完全浪费了大家的宝贵时间，我是个对自己和对他人不负责的人，我有愧与大家!

但我深深明的到：人无完人，每个人都有自己做错事的时候，重要的是自己犯了错误后如何改过自身，所以此后，我一定严格要求自己。

工作是打电话对我们的工作是百害而无一利的.

经过领导批评，和我个人的反省，保证以后不会再出现此类的情况了，不会因为个人的原因来破坏公司的纪律，这次造成的影响我向大家表示歉意，对不起，请领导给我处罚我愿意接受，请给我一个改过的机会，并请大家原谅我一次。我在以后的工作中一定加倍努力，对公司多做贡献，来弥补这次的过错。请大家相信我。

尊敬的_老师：

你好，希望你不因为我们的愚蠢行为而伤心!我要深深的向你鞠一躬，感谢你对我们的辛勤教导。

真对不起，我的行为让你失望了，我的举动让你操心了。我也很难过，我逃课了，虽然我很少逃课，但这是我不愿意看到的，这在我的学习生涯中留下了一个败笔。

这次逃课的经过大致是这样的。由于昨天下午有几个以前的同学回来了，邀请我一起去玩。说真的，我不想去，真的不想去，我不想因为玩耽误学习，我担心挨处罚，但是，在他们的一在坚持下，并以哥们义气要挟下，我的防线被摧毁了。

_老师，你知道的，现在同学们之间很流行哥们义气，虽然我知道这是不好的现象，可如果我不去，将会被他们孤立起来，被同伴抛弃的感觉是无法形容的，一个人孤孤单单的日子真的不好过，相信谁都不愿被伙伴抛弃，并且我当时认为只要适当注意，早一点回来，是不会有什么严重后果的。可是他们一直玩到很晚了才回家，我只有无奈的陪着。_老师，我当时玩得好苦呀!我想到你对我的谆谆教诲，想到父亲严厉的目光，想到你们失望的眼神，我不敢想，我不想这样玩啊。

由于出去玩耍时间过长，我逃课了，我深感内疚，我无法面对你，_老师。你惩罚我吧。

请你原谅，我会调控好自己的情绪，好好学习，不会再迟到了。再次感谢老师对我的关心与帮助。我不会让你失望的。

检讨人：___

20__年_月_日

亲爱的老婆大人：

关于我昨晚喝醉酒的事情，现在向您表示深深歉意。递交这篇检讨书给你，以深刻反省我的错误。

实际上对于昨晚喝醉酒的事情，我是有苦衷的。我原本时刻谨记你的教诲，也没有打算要去喝酒。可是朋友们拉拽得厉害，逼得我要多喝。没有办法，这帮朋友的强烈要求下，我就多喝了几杯。

现在面对错误我感到非常痛苦与难受，我不胜酒力，回家来又耍酒疯，给家人小孩带来了非常负面的影响，也让我这样父亲形象遭受了严重摧毁。

此时此刻，我悔不当初啊。特此向您表示深深歉意，并且保证今后我再也不跟这帮狐朋来往了。

此致!

尊敬的医院领导：

您好，在此向您递交这份工作失误违规的检讨书，以表达我对自己工作态度不端正、违反医院工作规定的无比愧疚心情。

对于我的工作失误，我觉得很大程度上是因为我的态度不端正、对工作怠慢与疏忽，我没有很好地遵守医院的规章制度，没有对自己工作严格要求，没有严肃履行自己职责义务。

我的工作失误违规，也是最令自己感到心痛的错误。错误的发生，充分地暴露出我在思想上、工作意识上存在严重欠缺，在工作操守上存在严重怠慢和疏忽。

我主观的认识不深刻，给我犯下如此工作埋下了隐患。而从发展的角度上分析，我个人这样的工作失误违规的错误如果不加以改正，继续发展下去，会对自己今后的工作形成很大的不利因素。

我一切工作的目的都是为了救助患者，而却在这段时间内放松了对自已的要求，没有严格按照法律的规定做到相关要求，工作失误违规。我这样的工作失误违规，对于患者的健康和医院的声誉都造成了不好的影响

在此，我向医院领导表示深深地歉意。并郑重地向您说一句：非常抱歉，我错了!

xxx

年月日

上午第二节课预备铃刚响起,我正准备上课,班长刘明和中队长林翔急急忙忙跑来向我汇报:“老师,不好了,许庆波和谈雄打起来了!”

一听这话,我急忙跑到教室,只见教室后门旁边,六七个同学分别抱着许庆波和谈雄,不准他们接近,许庆波和谈雄相对站着,虽然停止了打架,但两个人火气都很大,握紧拳头,好象随时要出手似的。我走到他们跟前,他们不敢看我,看样子他们刚动手就被同学拉开了,都没有受伤。这时,上课铃响了,劝解的同学开始散开,回自己的座位。大家都看着我,等着我对这两个惹祸的孩子作判决。

为了不影响上课,我决定下课再处理这件事,我对全班同学说:“我对刚才发生同学打架的事感到难过,不过,令我感到欣慰的是李冲、韩茹、刘明、林翔等几位同学及时出手劝架、解围,使这起打架事件变小了,我代表全班同学表扬这几个同学,希望大家向这几位同学学习,发现有不良现象能够及时制止,也希望打架的同学能够检讨、反思自己的行为。下面,我们先上课。”

下课后,我把这两个同学请到办公室,让他们说说是怎么一回事。但是,说了五分钟,他们都无法说清楚是怎么回事,不是他们表达不清楚,而是他们都一味说对方的不是,指责对方的错。第三节我还有课,他们是体育课,我就让他们回去分别写说明书。

中午放学,他们拿说明书给我看,我才知道原来是许庆波说谈雄的坏话,谈雄不服气,跟许庆波吵起来,吵着吵着就动起手了。在说明书里,他们都承认自己做错了。资料来源于公文写作范文网我问他们怎么该处罚,他们都愿意让我处罚。我提了两个处罚要求:一是要求他们回去想一想,当许庆波说谈雄的坏话之后,他们用什么样的方式处理,两人才不会打架,以《假如我……》为题目把自己的想法写出来,明天交给我;二是在一个星期内两人要合作做至少三件好事,再跟我谈感受。对于第二个要求,他们很快表示接受,可是对于第一个,他们都是怕写作文的同学,想用说代替写。我说不行,刚才让你们说还说不清楚,现在我倒要看看你们写作的能力了。

两个同学很无奈,离开办公室的时候交头接耳,说刚才真不应该打架,现在该怎么写不会打架的法子呢?我看着他们的背影笑了,就让他们一起去切磋不会打架的法子吧。

第二天一早,他们拿来文章给我看,许庆波写的是《假如我不动手》,谈雄写的是《假如我对许庆波笑一笑》,虽然写得比较简单,但是如果真的像他们“假如”的那样,当时他们一定不会打架。我让他们以后在与同学闹矛盾之前要想一想自己的“假如”,他们连连说好,并对我说他们要去做好事了。我看着他们的背影再次笑了!

反思:

同学之间因口角而打架,这是班集体里面经常发生的事。许庆波和谈雄在上课前打架,如果当时我即时对他们进行批评教育,不但影响了全班同学的学习时间,而且他们也还没有冷静下来,不容易接受教育。所以我对此作了冷处理,并表扬了劝解的同学,使全班同学知道,打架是可恶的,制止不良行为是值得称赞的。

对他们的处罚,我改变了以往批评教育的做法,没有让他们写检讨书,而是要求他们换一种思路,想想用什么样的方式处理当时的事情,两人才不会打架,以《假如我……》为题目写出来。目的是让他们对此次打架事件进行反思,我相信他们一定也不愿意打架,只不过自制力较弱致使打架,这时如果让他们换一种角度想想不会造成打架的方式,以后再遇到类似的事,他们肯定会联想到这些方式而避免打架。同时,我让他们合作做好事,是希望他们在合作的过程中增进友谊,在做好事的过程中提高品质和自制力。

尊敬的各位领导：

XXXX年XX月XX日，市局检查考评组对我XX派出所进行了XX工作综合考评，检查发现我所存在执法执勤、教育训练等台帐管理混乱的问题。XXXX年X月X日晚，副所长XXX将所里一辆**开回家中过夜，严重违反公车使用有关管理规定。几天来，我所支部人员经过认真反思，深刻自剖，对我所出现的这些问题，我们深感愧疚和不安，为领导工作添了乱，为分局抹了黑，更为重要的是我们感到对不起分局领导对我们的信任和期望，愧对领导的关心和厚爱。在此，我代表XX派出所党支部谨向各位领导做出深刻检讨，并将我们几天来的思想反思结果向领导汇报如下：

通过这次检查，让我所班子人员认识到我所在管理上存在严重的漏洞，也让我们意识到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己及部属要求不严，工作作风不实的必然结果。我们班子人员经过几天的反思，一致认为此次错误后果是严重的，影响是恶劣的。从制度上，暴露出我们制度还不严，不够健全不够完善，有些制度没有严格执行到位，有些监督检查也没有落实到位。作为主要领导，我们没有及时掌握每一位民警的工作任务落实情况，也没有对每一项具体工作进行督促检查，特别是对内勤各项工作检查不细，管理不够严，重视程度不够，导致出现工作被动情况;从管理上，暴露出我们平时对民警管理教育不够。我一定严肃检讨!

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

在我们与同学的相处过程中总是会有一些小矛盾，面对矛盾有的同学选择用武力解决，这种不理智的行为对自己和他人都是不利的。下面是小编给大家整理的关于学生打架检讨书的内容，欢迎大家查看。

尊敬的老师：

您好!我知错了，今天我怀着万分愧疚和懊悔以及沉痛的心情给您写下了这份检讨书。以向您表示我对打架这种不良行为的深刻认识以及再也不参与打架的决心。

这次犯错误，自己想了很多东西，反省了很多的事情，特别是自己作为一个高中生参与了打架，对于自己不理智的行为，我很自责。我触犯了学校的铁律，深刻认识到自己所犯错误的严重性，对自己所犯的错误感到了羞愧。学校一开学就三令五申，一再强调校规校纪，提醒学生不要违反校规，可我却没有把学校和老师的话放在心上，没有重视老师说的话，没有重视学校颁布的重要事项，当成了耳旁风，这些都是不应该的。也是对老师的不尊重。应该把老师说的话紧记在心，把学校颁布的校规校纪紧急在心。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我这次犯的错误不仅给自己带来了麻烦，耽误自己的学习。而且我这种行为给学校也造成了及其坏的影响,破坏了学校的管理制度.在同学们中间也造成了不良的影响。

由于我一个人的犯错误，有可能造成别的同学的效仿，影响班级纪律性，年级纪律性，对学校的纪律也是一种破坏，而且给对自己抱有很大期望的老师，家长也是一种伤害，也是对别的同学的父母的一种不负责任。每一个学校都希望自己的学生做到品学兼优，全面发展，树立良好形象，也使我们的学校有一个良好形象。每一个同学也都希望学校给自己一个良好的学习环境来学习，生活。包括我自己也希望可以有一个良好的学习环境，但是一个良好的学习环境靠的是大家来共同维护来建立起来的，而我自己这次却犯了错误，去破坏了学校的良好环境，是很不应该的，若每一个同学都这样犯错，那么是不会有良好的学习环境形成，对违反校规的学生给予惩罚也是应该的，我在家反省了半个月，自己想了很多，也意识到自己犯了很严重错误，我知道，造成如此大的损失，我应该为自己的犯的错误付出代价，我也愿意要承担尽管是承担不起的责任，尤其是作在重点高校接受教育的人，在此错误中应负不可推卸的主要责任。

我真诚地接受批评，并愿意接受学校给予的处理。对不起,老师!我犯的是一个严重的原则性的问题。我知道，老师对于我的犯校规也非常的生气。我也知道，对于学生，不触犯校规，不违反纪律，做好自己的事是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。如今,犯了大错,我深深懊悔不已。我会以这次违纪事件作为一面镜子时时检点自己，批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督。我要知羞而警醒，知羞而奋进，亡羊补牢、化羞耻为动力，努力学习。我也要通过这次事件，提高我的思想认识，强化责任措施。自己还是很想好好学习的，学习对我来是最重要的，对今后的生存，就业都是很重要的，我现在才很小 ，我还有去拼搏的能力。我还想在拼一次，在去努力一次，希望老师给予我一个做好学生的一个机会，我会好好改过的，认认真真的去学习 ，那样的生活充实，这样在家也很耽误课程，学校的课程本来就很紧，学起来就很费劲，在今后的学习生活中，我一定会好好学习，各课都努力往上赶记得刚进入学校时，班主任老师和副班主任对我抱有很大的期望，学习还能接受，可在纪律方面却出现了问题，在学校三令五申的铁律下，在严明校纪校规的大环境下，我犯下这么严重的错误，学校对我是应该严惩的，我不知多少次大声说，校长，老师我错了，我错了。

在这半月中，我每天还是按时就起床,想想我在学校也生活了近两年了。对学校已有很深的感情，在今后学校的我，会已新的面貌，出现在学校，不在给学校和年级还有我的班主任摸黑。无论在学习还是在别的方面我都会用校规来严格要求自己，我会把握这次机会。将它当成我人生的转折点，老师是希望我们成为社会的栋梁，所以我在今后学校的学习生活中更加的努力，不仅把老师教我们的知识学好，更要学好如何做人 ，犯了这样的错误，对于家长对于我的期望也是一种巨大的打击，家长辛辛苦苦挣钱，让我们可以生活的比别人优越一些，好一些，让我们可以全身心的投入到学习中去。但是，我犯的错误却违背了家长的心愿，也是对家长心血的一种否定，我对此很惭愧。

希望老师看到我这个态度也可以知道我对这次事件有很深刻的悔过态度，相信我的悔过之心，我的行为不是向老师的纪律进行挑战，是自己的一时失足，希望老师可以原谅我的错误，我也会向你保证此事不会再有第二次发生。对于这一切我还将进一步深入总结，深刻反省，恳请老师相信我能够记取教训、改正错误，把今后的事情加倍努力干好。同时也真诚地希望老师能继续关心和支持我，并却对我的问题酌情处理。

检讨人：XXX

日期：20XX年XX月XX日

亲爱的老婆，你一直对我喝酒一事意见挺大，那都是因为你爱我太深，怕喝酒有损我的健康。老婆啊，你是知道的，我原本不会喝酒，可人在江湖身不由己啊!

我们结婚后的第二年，我的同学李强也结婚了，在他的婚礼上，遇到一帮多年未见的老同学，大家自然有说不完的话。回忆当年上学的情景，那时大家是多么年轻，个个意气风发，自信满满。而现在，有的当了领导，有的赚了大钱，有的是一般工人，有的甚至下了岗，境遇不同，大家心情也就相差甚远，感慨万千啊!于是，我们当年的班长、现在的下岗工人提议：“什么都不说了，看得起我的，就喝酒!”老婆，你说，这样的时候，在单位还算混得可以的我能说我不会喝酒?这不表明我看不起他吗?

老婆，你看上我是因为我工作认真，人品不坏，我们领导也看上我这一点了。这不，在我而立之年，领导让我当上了办公室副主任。他老人家对我有知遇之恩，我对他自然是常怀感激之情。有一次，主任不在，领导带我出去应酬。大家说酒桌上无大小，其实酒桌上是最讲究“大小”、“尊卑”的地方，所以我得先敬各位领导。领导们的年龄、资历都在我之上，这都是让我多喝的理由。还有，我知道我们领导有胃病，不能多喝，所以看见有人非逼着他喝时，我替他喝就义不容辞了。当我喝掉领导酒杯里的酒后，我本能地想皱皱眉头的，可我不能啊，不仅不能皱眉，我还得拼出一丝笑来。老婆，你说我容易吗?

改制后，我们单位成公司了。那天，有一个重要客户来，我知道情况不妙，果真，经理走过来拍着我的肩膀笑着说：“中午别走了，陪客户吃饭。这笔单子能不能签下来就看你的了!”我知道肩上的担子有多重，但我只有豁出去了。推杯换盏之间，我也不知道自己喝了多少，只看见经理的脸笑成了一朵花。从酒店出来后，经理像感谢救命恩人一样握着我的手：“辛苦了，下午回家好好休息吧，不用上班了。”我踉跄着走了几步，听见经理还在说：“好好干，你很有前途啊!”啊?我的前途在酒杯里?老婆，你说，这在酒杯里的前途我是要还是不要啊?

如今，我已经慢慢体味了酒的滋味，明白了隐藏在酒里的内涵，知道了喝酒喝的是人际关系，以及“舍命陪君子”、“杯酒释前嫌”等道理，所以面对再反感的人我也要笑着敬上一杯。老婆，我的检讨写完了，要骂要打都由你，要不，就干脆给我一壶烈酒，让我一醉方休?

您好，我是四年级(3)班的王鹏，前几天我在课间写李老师布置下来的家庭作业，因为一时觉得写不出来。又为了能够尽快完全作业，轻轻松松回家。我就借了同学的一本数学题练习本抄袭答案，结果被老师发现了。就将我的作业本没收了，老师当面批评了我，并要求我写这篇检讨书。

事后我仔细想过了老师的话，我深刻地知道了自己所犯的错误，我也要主动向老师认错。

李老师，我真的错了，我以后再也不抄袭作业了。因为老师布置的作业就是给我们加深对知识的理解，能够帮助我们巩固知识的。而我却没有深刻明白这一道理，居然为了图省力，图方便就去借同学的习题册抄袭，实在是太不应该了!关于我认为习题难写这一问题，我保证今后我要在课堂上认真听讲，认真思考。上课不做小动作，不随便乱说话，思想不开小差。

我要以实际行动，回报老师的教导之情。争做老师眼中、家里眼中的好学生，以实际行动和良好的成绩为集体争光。

亲爱的xxx同志：

首先，很久没手写过东西，多少有点提笔忘字的感觉，仔细想想，自出生以来，27 年的时光里，我xxx始终是老师或者家长眼里的学习认真刻苦做事稳重的好孩子，未曾写过检讨书，这算是破了戒了，当然私底下也希望这也是最后一次了，缘由有二，一是实在不想再犯这样严重地错误了，自己的一个无心之举，居然会给您幼小善良的心灵造成如此大的伤害，其次是检讨书已然是马后炮了，于事无补的，给你造成的伤害已经无法弥补，哪怕是写一份上万字的检讨书恐怕也是无用，我希望自己借此机会，能够吃一堑长一智，以后无论是在生活中还是工作中，多少还是要多几分心眼和思考的，这也是一个优秀的男人必须俱有的优良品质的，以免自己的无心过失之举给自己身边的人，无论是亲爱的还是同事，造成不必要的伤害，也给自己留下无法弥补的遗憾。

和你相处了这段时间里，我发现到你是一个非常善良可爱的女孩子，待人真诚，风趣幽默，乐观开朗，心思细腻，温柔贤良，聪明勤奋的好女孩(此处省去一万个好词语)的好女孩，当然也深深地应证了一句话，恋爱中的女人真的好傻，傻得如此可爱，傻得让我如此心疼不已。也许真是你这一点一滴傻傻的可爱，让我深深地迷恋上了你。我也知道，在这个物欲横流的年代，能够找到一个和自己共同奋斗实属不易，能够找到一个像你这般如此贤良地更是难得，所以这段感情，从一开始，我就已经告诫自己，要用心地好好经营，好好呵护你，学会感恩，懂得珍惜，舍得付出。千言万语不敌实干二字，我们伟大的习主席说过，空谈误国，实干兴邦，没有花言巧语，没有甜言蜜语，只有我的肺腑之言，真的真的很爱很爱你。自认为自己没有好大的学问，只能现学现用，孟子说，君子有三乐，父母俱存，兄弟无故，此一乐也;仰不愧于天，俯不怍于人，二乐也;第三句原本是得天下之英才而教育之，三乐也，我想改为，得终生知己之伴侣，才是人生最大的快乐，我想我会是你人生道路上合格的伴侣，xxx，你怎么看呢?

突然发现自己原来并非不善于写东西，只要是情真意切，发自内心，这样的东西写起来还真是得心应手，可以保证，这绝对是我的原创，绝对对得起良心，经得起考验，请组织审查我检讨的诚意。弱弱地问组织一句，超字数加分不??

检讨人：

日期：

敬爱的老师：

我是你的学生：XXX。今天我怀着愧疚和懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对旷课这种不良行为的深刻认识以及再也不旷课的决心。

早在我踏进校门，老师就已三申五令，一再强调，全校同学不得旷课。但是我还是多次无故旷课。关于旷课的事情，我觉得有必要说一说。事情的经过是这样的：我一般都是会去上课的，很多次没有请假又没有去上课，是因为比如我的一些同学朋友来学校找我，有时是找我耍，有时是找我借书，学习资料，有时又是朋友住院需要我去看看等等。我觉得这些原因向老师请假是不充分的，而且如果多次向老师用这些方式请假也是不可能都同意的。所以，我选择了旷课这种行为。虽然我知道这种行为也是不对的，但是我还是做了，所以，我觉得有必要而且也是应该向老师做出这份书面检讨，让我自己深深的反省一下自己的错误。

对不起，老师!我犯的是一个严重的原则性的问题。我知道，老师对于我的无故旷课也非常的生气。我也知道，对于学生，保证每堂课按时上课，不早退，不旷课是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我渐渐的认识到自己将要为自己的冲动付出代价了。老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我深为震撼，也已经深刻的认识到事已至此的重要性。如今，大错既成，我深深懊悔不已。深刻检讨，认为在本人的思想中已深藏了致命的错误：思想觉悟不高，本人对他人的尊重不够，以后我将对老师有更多的尊重.对重要事项重视严重不足。平时生活作风懒散，如果不是因为过于懒散也不至于如此。为了更好的认识错误，也是为了让老师你能够相信学生我能够真正的改正自己的错误，保证不再重犯，我将自己所犯的错误归结如下：

思想上的错误：对于自己不是很感兴趣的课程的重视不够。对于这一点，我开始反省的时候并没有太在意，但是，经过深刻的反省，我终于认识到了，这个错误才是导致我旷课的重要原因。试问：如果我很喜欢这门课程，我自己会无故随意旷这门课吗?这个错误也反映到了我平时没有旷课的课堂效率上。很多我不感兴趣的课程，往往我并没有自始自终的专心听讲，这种行为虽然没有扰乱同学和老师的教与学，但是这对于自己来说，却是一个严重的错误。对于学校开设的每一门课程都有学校的理由，我们作为学生就更应该去认真学习。

检讨人：xxx

xxxx年x月x日

亲爱的：

你好。我是带着忏悔和愧疚的心情来写这封检讨书的。我错了。一想到我伤害了你，我这张老脸就开始扭曲开始变形，是的，我哭了，真的，不骗你，我流了一屁股的泪。不信你可以去问俺村傻蛋。昨天晚上，内疚的俺悲痛欲绝，于是俺就趴在他家窗口上号啕大哭，已经关灯睡觉的傻蛋听到声音就起来推开窗想看个究竟。月光下，俺的脸白的象姑娘的屁股，俺的眼泪象你侄子那绵绵不绝的鼻涕，俺的嘴张的象他家的尿盆，俺的兔牙闪烁着泠泠清光，象一把争芒的利刃。傻蛋被俺吓到了。亲爱的，你知道那家伙本来就脑袋被门挤过，这下把他吓的，猛的关上窗，抄起一条粗棍就冲他媳妇抡去，边抡还边唱流行歌曲：看见蟑螂，我不怕不怕啦……。

亲爱的，俺对着你家的灯泡发誓，俺这次的悔过是非常诚挚的。俺保证以后不会再犯同样的错误，以观音姐姐的名义。亲爱的，你知道你在我心中的地位是多么的重要么?就象俺铁哥们卧龙后生描叙的那样：你是春天的白菜帮，夏天的西瓜秧，秋天的菠菜汤，冬天的土豆筐。你是那样的朴实而不可或缺。我迷恋着你，相思着你。每个夜晚来临的时候，我都是那样的思念着你。我想你吃饭忘记了张嘴，上厕所忘记了带手纸，就在昨天，我酒入愁肠化作了相思泪，这是你知道的，你不知道的是，我回家走错了门楼，喝酒丢了裤头，这完完全全是因为我对你的爱够挚够深，已然达到了物我两忘的境界。

天下母猪三千水，唯你痴肥最可人。亲爱的，别说你没有缺点，就算你有天大的缺点，俺这啤酒肚也容下了。所以说，你应该能理解，俺的对你的伤害俺的恶语相加其实是无心的是慌不择言的。你看，你看，你的肚子也一天天大了起来，乳房也一天天隆了起来，肚大奶大都有容，要不，你也就此原谅我吧?就把我当成一个响屁给放了吧?!只有这样，我们的爱情才能和谐，才能符合爱情的科学发展观，符合爱情市场的价值观，符合……，甭管他还符合什么了，你得原谅我，你要是不原谅我，我就……我就……就那啥了，对，俺就去变性，变成一个花枝招展的小娘子去勾搭你老爹，然后跟你爹狼狈为婚，让你叫我妈，看你怕不怕!

亲爱的，原谅我哈，这是后生那厮教给我的，说是要软硬兼施，也不知道对你有没有用。总之呢，我对你的爱可昭日月，我可不想因为这么一点小事，(当然，在亲爱的你看来肯定是大事，我只是引用后生那家伙的原话，他说了，小家雀来月经，多大点鸟事啊。)，而永失我爱。亲爱的，这页就掀过去吧。给俺一点点面子哈，让俺在朋友面前也能挺直身子。字数够了吧?那俺就结尾了哈?!---改革春风吹满地，不蒸馒头争口气。一场风波没咋地，邻家小妹真美丽。

尊敬的校领导：

在此非常感谢您能抽出宝贵的时间来看我的检讨，我作为一名小学教师，在后半学期我没有按照学校规定制度及教学进度计划写教案，没有让学生们按任务量写作业，未及时批改作业，作为一名教师这就是一种不负责任的行为，本人为自己这种不负责任的行为做出深刻的检讨。本次严重错误都是因为本人工作态度不端正导致的工作失误，我对错误的全面认识如下：

作为一名年轻的人民教师，我的思想觉悟上存在严重不足，我的工作作风懒散，不够严谨。像我这样的工作业务失误，在大多数情况下，都是因为自己对工作态度的不端正、不上进才犯下的。我这种对工作不重视、不专心，不严谨恰恰暴露出我懒散的工作作风。

而我在日常工作中又缺乏谨慎态度，没有以一个严谨、认真的态度面对自己的工作。我此等错误的发生，跟我在日常工作中存在懈怠、偷懒、怕吃苦等因素是分不开的。这表露出了我在工作作风上的严重问题，以及在工作上的不成熟和不严谨。

教师是一个神圣的职业，被誉为人类灵魂的工程师，辛勤的园丁，无私奉献的红烛;是连接知识与学生的桥梁;是知识的传授者。家长既然把孩子交给了我们，我们就有责任去教好学生。

我已经从这次教训中吸取了经验，今后必定会更加注意!

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分