检检讨书分几个部分精选20篇

今天，小编为你收集了一篇好用的1000字的上课吵闹的检讨书，请看看！

上课吵闹检讨书

尊敬的老师：

今天，我怀着愧疚和懊悔写下这份检讨书，以表示我以后对自习课讲话这种不良行为的深刻认识以及再也不在上课的时候讲闲话的决心。

我真的不应该在自习的时候说话，我不应该违背老师的规定，我们作为学生就应该完全的听从老师的话，而我这次没有很好的重视到老师讲的话。我感到很抱歉，希望老师可以原谅我。

不过，人总是会犯错误的，我不能以此作为借口，我们还是要尽量的避免这样的错误发生，希望老师可以相信我。“人有失手，马有失蹄”.我的不良行为不是向老师的纪律进行挑战。绝对是失误，老师说的话很正确，我感到真的是很惭愧，不知道为什么，很自然的就说了起来，我感到非常抱歉。

老师管是为了我们好，我们学生唯一可以做的事情就是好好的听从老师的话，好好的学习，让老师可以放心、信任。

犯了这样的错误，对于家长的打击也很大，我违背了家长的心意，犯了这样的错误，我对此也感到很惭愧，我们能做的就是做他们的乖孩子，听从家长的话，尽量的避免家长生气，不给他们带来不必要的烦恼。

错误的性质是严重的。我在上课的时候讲闲话，并且影响了其他的同学，其结果损害了多方利益，在学校造成极坏的影响。我只是顾着自己和别人的一时高兴，一时的想法，完全不理会班长的感受。这是不对的，大家不应该只是想着自己，这么做，害的是那些一起讲话的同学，而转自个人述职报告范文且，在自习的时候讲闲话也是对班长的不尊重。

中国是一个礼仪之邦，自古就讲究尊师重道，这是一种传统的美德，过去我一直忽视了它。不单单是老师，无论对任何人，我们都应该尊重他，尊重他。作为一名当代中学生，一个接受教育的人来说，这显然不符合我们的要求。

再次，我这种行为还在班级同学间造成了及其坏的影响。同学之间本应该互相学习，互相帮助，纪律良好 “第四十中学”在人们心目中一直是一个学术严谨的学校，我们应该去维护这个形象而不是去破坏它!与人为善是中华民族的优良传统美德，是当代中学生所必备的品质。鲁迅先生说过：不友善的帮助就是恶意的伤害。我只有认真反思，寻找错误的深刻根源。认清问题的本质，才能给自己一个交待，是自己更快的进步。

早在我踏进校们，老师就已三申五令，一再强调，不得在上自习的时候讲闲话，影响自习效果。我应当珍惜这个机会，可是我错过了，这莫过于人生的一大损失

如今，大错既成，我懊悔不已。深刻检讨，认为在本人对他人的尊重不够，以后我将对班长有更多的尊重。

事无巨细。见微知着，由小及大，我作为一名初一学生还像小孩子一样在自习课上讲话成了极恶劣的影响。

今后我一定会好好学习，上自习课不讲闲话，并且积极为班级做贡献，为班级添光彩!请老师相信我!

检讨人：

时间：

妈妈：

昨天晚上我惹你生气了，我错了，很对不起！

爸爸跟我说，妈妈你昨天晚上哭了，今天早上又哭了，你很伤心。因为，我是你的宝贝儿子，是最爱你的儿子惹你生气！你为我做了那么多事，儿子却没有好好感谢你！

妈妈，我很后悔，我知道错了！今天早上，我向你道歉，你没有理我！我知道，你还在生我的气。现在，我后悔得都哭了，这个检讨书，是我哭着给你写的。

妈妈，你的儿子永远爱你。我做错了事，你就批评我、狠狠地批评，打我也行，但是一定要理我，好不好？！

妈妈，中午你来接我了，我知道你已经原谅我了，谢谢你！我以后一定可以做得很好。

妈妈，爸爸要我做一个真正的男子汉，独立起来，懂事起来，乖起来！

妈妈，从现在开始，我要自己睡觉，睡自己的上下床。爸爸说他支持我，妈妈你也要支持我哟！

妈妈，从现在开始，我要自己管自己。每天自己收拾书包，自己检查课本，坚持游泳，坚持拉二胡，特别是要坚持写日记，好好学习，天天向上。

妈妈，你要相信我，我一定会改正错误，做一个好孩子的！

妈妈，这个检讨书，是爸爸陪我写的，但都是我真心要说的话，我决心要去做到的。

妈妈，你就看我的行动吧！

您好!我是xxxxx，在这里给您写下这份检讨书,以向您表示我对旷课迟到这种不良行为的深刻认识以及以后也不旷课迟到的决心。

早在我踏进校门,老师就已三申五令,一再强调,全校同学不得旷课迟到。但是我还是无故旷课迟到。关于旷课迟到的事情，我觉得有必要说一说。事情的经过是这样的：每次放学放假我就想提前出去所以，我选择了旷课这种行为。虽然我知道这种行为是不对的，但是我还是做了，所以，我觉得有必要而且也是应该向老师做出这份书面检讨，让我自己深深的反省一下自己的错误。

对不起,领导和老师!我犯的是一个严重的原则性的问题。我知道，领导和老师对于我的无故旷课也非常的生气。我也知道，对于学生，保证每堂课按时上课，不早退，不旷课是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我渐渐的认识到自己将要为自己的冲动付出代价了。

几经深思，我决定以以下的行为向老师表达自己认错的决心：

1、向老师认错，写检查书。既然自己已经犯了错，我就应该去面对，要认识到自己的错误，避免以后犯同样的错误。

2、提高纪律性。我应该认真学习学校的校规校纪，并且做到自觉遵守。不迟到，不早退，不旷课。有事应该先向老师请假。

3.提高自己的思想觉悟。对各门课程都应该引起重视，并且要养成良好的学习和生活作风。

4。制定学习，认真克服生活懒散、粗心大意的缺点，努力学习，以好成绩来弥补我的过错。

尊敬的学校领导：

在X月X日上午9：20分，当时我班级课堂在进行课文习题讲解，这时候课堂上非常吵闹，一些同学随便讲话，一些同学还在座位抽屉里折纸飞机。当时我见到那番情景，顿时间就非常生气，整个人就陷入了焦躁情绪，命令几名带头违反纪律的同学罚站到教室后面，期间一名同学表现得非常不耐烦，我就生气地用力拉拽了几下，导致这名同学摔倒在地上，腿部轻微擦伤。

平时这几名同学成绩不理想，当时又违反纪律，我一心想管好他们，加上当时就快面临期中考试了。我在焦躁情绪的影响下，就做出了这样不当的教官行为。

现在看来，我当时的行为是有些不妥了。管教学生本来是应该的，可是这些孩子毕竟还只是十一、二岁，他们也没有完全的行为能力，有时候就不由自主地失去了上课注意力。我不应该这么不耐心，还做出了过激举动，导致孩子受轻伤。

事后，我非常后悔，孩子毕竟还小，我应该更加耐心地教育他们。以后，我一定要更加理智地对待孩子，用心呵护他们，给他们更多改正错误的机会。

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

就在风和日丽，似水柔情的一个早上，不幸的我睡过头了，醒来时发现18个未接电话，20条短信，朦胧的睁开眼睛，看着熟悉的号码，忽然惊醒，瞪大双眼，啊!“阎王”的电话。

第一次我装病，侥幸躲过。“阎王”没有多话，只是说，生病了下次记得先请假。一句好好休养匆匆挂断电话。

又是一个风和日丽，似水柔情的一个早上，我不幸的又一次睡到了太阳照屁股，。“阎王”来电话，一按通话键就听对方说，是不是又生病了啊?我轻轻地嗯了一句。。“阎王”说，你体弱多病啊，希望下次听到的不是这个理由。庆幸我又一次的被释放了。

还是一个风和日丽，似水柔情的一个早上，尤为严重的是，我睡到了10点，人还没到公司，这次不是电话被震醒，而是被一个送快递上门的敲醒。一看时间，我大惊失色深感不安，顿时心潮澎湃，涛涛江水连绵不绝，又如泛滥黄河，一发不可收拾了，这回晓得死神要来了。

没顾得上洗刷，我一路匆匆飞奔，而后又像个贼似的悄悄地躲进办公室，该死的恰好碰上“阎王”，那瞬间几乎心跳停了几秒种。这回知道此事难辞其咎，自知罪孽不浅，难以修成正果。暗自求上帝与如来佛祖网开一面，能让我侥幸躲过此劫。没想到的是那“阎王”似吃了炸弹，把我叫到她的办公室狠狠的训了一顿。说什么无视公司的存在，藐视劳动纪律，不遵守时间就是不遵守生命等等的一堆教训的话。滔滔不绝后又非让我写下书面检讨不可。

我内心直嘀咕，都他妈的是风和日丽，似水柔情惹的祸。

古训有曰，事不过三。如果有一次重来的机会放在我面前，我保证一定不再迟到，不能待大难临头之时再去反悔莫及，人世间最无聊的事莫过于此，如果时光可以倒流，我一定不会再犯雷打不动之过，请诸神赏我这个面子，让我洗心革面，悔过自新。哎，可是机会总是给了那些有准备且识时务为俊杰的人。

我尊敬的领导，我已深深地觉悟，深深地唤醒了我的良知，今日之举，实在愧对公司和您的苦心栽培。谢谢您给我这样忏悔的机会，我会以此次的检讨书作为一面镜子，时时检点自己，批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督。深入贯彻您的指示精神，要知羞而警醒，知羞而奋进，亡羊补牢、化羞耻为动力，努力做到三决一保政策，决不迟到，决不违反公司规章制度，决不让领导失望的事，保证准时上下班，你不让我加班我也加班。

同时我也要通过这次事件，提高我的思想认识，强化我的时间观念。我深知您对我迟到之事是恨铁不成钢，深痛恶绝，但也罪不至死，请领导您务必网开一面，不要把杀一儆百的政策实施在我身上。实话说，对您的挟天子令诸侯之计我佩服的全体投地。不晓得是我的名字起得不幸，还是您的记忆太好，我的臭名，总是在您的脑海中挥之不去，让你才下眉头却上心头。

对于此事我深感懊悔，于是乎在内心深处，我只能理解为天有不测风云，人有祸福旦夕。但是迟到始终是不对的，我对自己的一失足，抱头痛哭到深刻的反省，请领导您能对我从宽处理，如果说月奖金非扣不可，请务必控制在两个零以下，所谓千金散失还复来，钱损是小面子是大，同时也真诚地希望领导您能继续关心和支持我。谢谢!

范文一

尊敬的老师：

xx细小的2班的学生会干部在对我们宿舍进行安全检查的时候搜出两个热得快，做出了当场没收的处罚，并记下我们宿舍全体人员的名字，对此我表示接受，也感谢他们能发现并指正我们的错误，避免了更严重的错误的发生。这两个热得快是我们为了减去下楼打开水的麻烦而买的，而且我也用过。在学生会干部和老师的耐心教导下，通过学习宿舍安全管理条例，我认识到了问题的严重性，并对自己违反校纪校规的行为进行了认真的反思和深刻的自剖。在此，我谨向各位领导、学生会干部做出深刻检讨，并将我这两天来的反思结果汇报如下：

第一，我们的行为不符合一个大学生的要求。作为当代大学生，我们应该识大体、顾大局，在校纪校规面前人人平等，我不应该为了一己之便违反校纪校规。况且，我们宿舍楼层不高，下楼打开水是一件很方便的事，控制自己不用类似的大功率用电器并不是一件很困难的事。

第二，五一长假将至，使用热得快之类大功率用电器增加了意外事故发生的机率，我们应主动配合学院搞好安全工作，学院老师三令五申、班干也一再强调，要求我们不使用大功率用电器，但这都成了耳旁风，这些都是不应该的。

第三，我的行为还在宿舍间造成了极坏的影响。同学之间本应该互相学习，互相促进，而我的表现给同学们带了一个坏头，不利于校风和院风的建设。同时，也对学校形象造成了一定损害，有时，没有打到水或图方便，就用热得快烧水。当时的侥幸心理酿成了现在的后果。虽然我这种行为方便了自己，但是，我是在他人的安全之上的自己得利，我是在自私自利的帽子下，方便自己的。只有认真反思，寻找极大错误后面的深刻根源，认清问题的本质，才能给集体和自己一个交待，从而得以进步。做为一名学生，我没有做好自己的本职，给学院老师和学生会干部的工作带来了很大的麻烦。

在深刻的自我反思之后，我决定有如下个人整改措施：

一，按照要求上交内容深刻的检讨书一份，对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其可能造成的严重后果。

二，用心克服生活懒散、粗心大意的缺点。

三，和同学、班干以及学生会干部加强沟通。保证今后不再出现违反校纪校规的情况。

我非常感谢老师和学生会干部对我所犯错误的及时指正，我保证今后不会再有类似行为发生在我身上，并决心为我校的安全工作和迎评工作作出自己的一份微薄之力。请关心爱护我们的老师同学继续监督、帮助我改正缺点，使我取得更大的进步!

检讨人：

时间：

范文二

亲爱的各位老师:

我代表所有宿舍成员写下此检讨书,并承诺,以后绝对按要求打扫好宿舍卫生.

在宿舍成绩被评为0分之后,宿舍成员展开了激烈的讨论,究其原因我们总结为以下几点:

1值日制度不够完善,由于宿舍有六个人而只上五天课,所以值日相当混乱.

2生活杂乱,宿舍中绝大多数同学都是第一次住校,所以思想和行为上难免有些怠惰.

针对以上两点,我们已想出了切实可行的措施:

我们会在门后的小黑板上写下每周舍员干值日的顺序,而且舍长将负责提前提醒干值日的同学;时常清理桌面,整理床铺,力求干净整洁.

此致

检讨人：

时间：

范文三

尊敬的老师及领导：

您好!

我是第五宿舍224寝室的学生，检查人员于2012年12月18日星期二在对我宿舍进行安全检查的时候发现电热水壶并做出了当场没收的处罚，记下我的宿舍号，对此我表示接受，也感谢他们能发现并指正我们的错误，避免了更严重的错误的发生。我将对此次违规行为进行一次认真的、彻底的、深刻的检讨。

这次犯错误，自己想了很多东西，反省了很多的事情，自己也很懊悔，很气自己，去触犯学校的铁律，也深刻认识到自己所犯错误的严重性，对自己所犯的错误感到了羞愧。学校一开学就三令五申，一再强调校规校纪，提醒学生不要违反校规，可我却没有把学校和老师的话放在心上，没有重视老师说的话，没有重视学校颁布的重要事项，当成了耳旁风，这些都是不应该的。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我这次犯的错误不仅给自己带来了麻烦，耽误自己的学习。而且我这种行为给学校也造成了及其坏的影响,破坏了学校的管理制度.在同学们中间也造成了不良的影响。

接下来，我要说的是这次事件的缘由。学校为了我们学生用水安全方便，实施了水卡用水制度。50元办理一张水卡可以用很长一段时间。虽然水卡用完后可以继续充值，但我觉得水卡还是蛮贵的。于是觉得用电热水壶比较方便。电热水壶可以用很长时间，而且比较便宜。于是我违背了学校的规章制度，买了电热水壶。那天正在宿舍里正在烧水时，老师突击检查违章电器。我被当场抓到了。对此，我表示万分后悔和难过。以上是事情的缘由，也是我当时的真实想法。然而，现在看来，却不过是为自己开脱的借口。

面对错误，最最重要的是分析错误产生的原因，并引以为鉴，确保下次不再犯同样的错误。剖析本次错误，原因有下：

1、思想纪律性不够强，行为之前没有考虑行为会带来多大的后果，甚至以为这只是无关紧要的行为，没有认识到事情的严重性。

2、安全意识淡薄。总以为只要我们妥善使用，就不会发生什么安全事故，殊不知很多很多校园安全事故都是由于侥幸心理作祟而酿成的。而且一旦发生事故，殃及的可是整个寝室甚至是整栋楼的人，责任重大。

3、集体责任感不够强烈。身为寝室一员，明知这一行为的存在，却没有及时阻止，反而进行瞎掺和，是我没有尽到寝室一员的责任，我在这里想我亲爱的室友、敬爱的领导致以

深深的歉意，我保证以后会改正。

4、没有好好阅读和学习《学生手册》，没有培养安全意识，没有充分认识电器使用过程中存在的安全隐患。通过对宿舍安全管理条例细则的学习，我深刻意识到自己犯的错误的严重性。错误的性质是严重的，我们这种纵容违反学校规定的电器在宿舍存放的行为是有悖于合格大学生的行为。使用违章电器有很多危害，如性能下降，耗电大效率低，可靠性差，安全系数低，有触电危险，易跑冒滴漏，操作不灵活，磨损严重，噪音大，无故障运行时间，短服务不到位，折旧快，保值能力差等影响。这种行为的结果损害了多方的利益，在学校造成了极其不良的影响。使用电热水壶的时候我想的是不需要心疼用水的钱，但是我却忘了使用电热水壶是有着严重安全隐患。

我的行为还在宿舍间造成了极坏的影响。同学之间本应该互相学习，互相促进，而我的表现给同学们带了一个坏头，不利于校风和院风的建设。同时，也对学校形象造成了一定损害，有时，没有打到水或图方便，就用电热水壶烧水。当时的侥幸心理酿成了现在的后果。虽然我这种行为方便了自己，但是，我是在他人的安全之上的自己得利，我是在自私自利的帽子下，方便自己的。只有认真反思，寻找极大错误后面的深刻根源，认清问题的本质，才能给集体和自己一个交待，从而得以进步。

做为一名学生，我没有做好自己的本职，给学院老师和学生会干部的工作带来了很大的麻烦。这种行为，即使没有对宿舍及周围同学带来损失，这个举动本身就违背了做合格学生的原则。作为一名当代大学生，一名正在接受高等教育的人来说，如此低下的安全防范意识是对老师工作不尊重的表现，也是对身边的同学的生命和财产不尊重的表现，这种表现显然不符合社会对我们的要求。

其次，我们的这种行为还在寝室间造成了极其不良的影响，破坏了学校的规章管理制度，不利于学校和院系的风气建设。同时，对学校形象也造成了一定的损害。我们应该去维护学校的形象而不是去破坏它。我们只有认真反思，寻找极大错误后面的深刻根源，认清问题的本质，才能给学校、集体、老师和自己一个交代，从而得以改正自己的错误，取得进步。作为一名大三的学生，我没有做好自己的本职工作，没有为刚入学的同学做良好的学习榜样，给宿舍管理科的老师在宿舍管理的工作上带来了极大的麻烦。我们的行为使我们的宿舍存在了巨大的安全隐患，但事前我们并没有意识到事情的严重性，由此在宿舍埋下了灾难的种子，我们的行为严重威胁到集体的生命财产安全。为此，我诚恳的向大家道歉。同时我还上网百度了很多有关宿舍使用违章电器而导致的财产损失。如上海静安区胶州路教师楼于2010年

11月15日下午14点30分左右失火的新闻报道，这次火灾造成了58人死亡多人受重伤以及数千万元损失!前几年的海商学院火灾。11月14日早晨，上海商学院徐汇校区宿舍楼602寝室内起火，因寝室内烟火过大，4名女生被逼到阳台上，后分别从阳台跳下逃生，4人均当场死亡。

深刻的意识到我所犯错误的严重性，也理解了宿管和学校领导对此事的重视。为此，我深感内疚和惭愧。我辜负了老师对我的殷切希望，辜负了同学们对我的信任，辜负了宿管的教诲。我再次向老师们和同学们进行诚挚的道歉。这件事情对我的教育是深刻的，同时也是惨痛的。我的这次经历更使我们深深体会到安全意识的重要性。安全防范意识是非常重要的，这不仅关系到我们自己的生命财产安全，更关系到集体和大家的利益，我的这种行为是一种自私的表现。因此，我总结反思，反省自己的错误，并在以后的日子里互相监督。在深刻的自我反思之后，我决定有如下个人整改措施：

一，按照要求上交内容深刻的检讨书一份，对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其可能造成的严重后果，向老师认错。既然自己已经犯了错，我就应该去面对，要认识到自己的错误，避免以后犯同样的错误。所以，我写下这篇深刻的检讨，向老师表明我认错的决心。

检讨人：

时间：

我是一名高中教师，经历了那么多的事情，听说了更多的事情，真的有一种自己不配做一名教师的感觉，特检讨如下：

一、我的专业素质太低。

我在大学所学的内容只是本专业的内容，但却没有想到，在登上讲台以后，我还要面对的是其他的问题，例如，高考早就实行三科综合考试了，我们的教育也一再强调我们要注意培养学生的综合素质，可是，我们国家在1994年开始实行高中会考制度以后，地理已经成为高一的时候就已经结束的会考科目，而且文科生高考只进行“3+2”(语、数、外三门主科和政治、历史共五门的课程)，这种情况一直持续到1999年(有的地方可能要早一点或者有的地区还要晚一点)，但就是这一批不学习地理的文科教师毕业后从事的教学工作，却要担负起政治、历史、地理的文科综合考试的任务，所以我为自己不能精通其他的专业而检讨;(但想一想，比起我的一些同学毕业后被-迫改行教其他学科，我还应该是学为所用)。我也为自己的电脑专业的知识过于浅薄而检讨，因为领导要求我们进行多媒体教学，而且最好加上flash动画的效果，最好不要从网上下载，尽量的自己来制作，我为自己只能制作简单的PPT课件并且还不能经常使用而检讨。

二、我的教学内容过于狭隘。

尽管要求素质教育，可惜我们也确实不知道素质教育究竟应该从那里抓起。我们只能在学习的方法上进行指导，在教学的方法上进行各种各样的改革，我们只能盯着高考这个目标不放松，因为如果高考成绩不理想，小的损失是奖金和年终考核，但如果影响到学校的声誉，那么你还怎么能在这里呆下去?所以，我为这个而检讨，我们如果不仅仅只是抓高考，不仅仅是只为我们的短浅目光，那么我们的素质教育早就遍地结果了。

三、我没有心理教师的素养。

教师工作失职检讨书优秀范文教师工作失职检讨书优秀范文

尽管我是师范专业出身，也学习过教育心理学，但我在教学的过程中，也确实忽略了学生的心理素质的培养，尽管告诉了他们应该面对困难不放松，尽管也告诉他们要以振兴国家民族为己任，尽管告诉了他们应该同情弱者应该大家团结如家人，但由于没有制定具体的考核章程，学生是否记住我就不清楚了。

四、我忽视了对学生的团队精神的培养。

在教学的过程中，我只是能根据学生的个人特点而采取具体的教学任务，要发展学生的个性，要让他们知道好成绩是靠他们的努力分不开的，在这个过程中，我只做到了让学生认识到要不断的自己去努力去拼搏，尽管告诉他们国家和集体利益为重，尽管告诉了他们应该个人利益服从国家和集体利益，却忽略了让他们的团体精神的培养，忘记告诉他们在一个团队中应如何作战，应如何真正的顾全大局，，没有告诉他们在团队中是没有平均主义的，因为我这方面的失误，所以导致后来很多的学生在走向社会后，面对团队中的不平均的状况没有一个成熟的心态来对待。我检讨。

我为我不能一天24小时的盯着我的学生而检讨，尽管早晨5点起床，晚上在学生休息以后(一般是在晚上10点)我才回家，但我依然面对学生家长的指责只能检讨，那个家长气愤的说：“我们的孩子下半夜3点怎么还能够出去打游戏呢，还不是你们没有看好他们?你们严重失职!”我真的没有办法说出家长错在什么地方，人家把孩子送来的目的就是让我管教的严一点，我真的为自己不能24小时睁着眼睛而检讨。

我为自己不能通晓万事而检讨，面对学生有时的提问，我怎么可以说出：“我回去查查再回答你好吗?”这样的话来，我为自己不能上通天文下通地理而检讨。

我为自己不能写出更多的论文而检讨，所以在评职称的时候让评委为难，我检讨。

我为自己不能更好的维护教师的形象而检讨，每次到菜市场，那些小贩总是说我“哎哟，你们做老师的就是太计较，怎么还和我们讨价还价呢?”呵呵，我的工资是纸哦，我不应该那么的爱惜，我为自己不能改变教师的形象而检讨，我依然是为一角钱而斗争，真真的惭愧。

我为自己不能出更多的汗而检讨。面对他们说“教师多轻松，不出汗就能拿那么高的工资”而检讨。

我为自己没有接受学生家长的礼物而检讨，因为别人总是说我们“你们家里是不是什么东西也不用买，学生家长送的就可以了”，我为自己没有做到这一点而检讨。

古人常说，“行有不得，反求诸己”，但一开始，我并未能及时地进行自我反省。古人又说，“君子务本、本立而道生”，因此，在自我反省的过程中，一定要把犯错误的根本原因找出来，若是找不到根本原因所在，敷衍了事，于事无补，将来还会犯更多更严重的错误。悔悟后，归结原因如下：

1、责任心不强，工作作风不深入，不踏实。作为一名执法人员，不论有多少理由，都应端正执法办案的态度、严格执法办案的程序，全面准确地掌握案件情况，确保事实无误、程序无误;对同事提出的疑问，更应认真核实、查对。同时，更是要增强自身的法律意识，切忌工作上的随意性。有一句法的格言说到“魔鬼出于细节”。

2、事发后，不能心平气和地面对错误，有逃避的心理。一开始，就想着把很多问题推给别人，而不能立刻想着先从自己身上找原因。为什么不能心平气和呢，因为是“龌龊的面子”在作怪：觉得自己读了那么多年书，起码也是个正宗本科学历，心理上建立了一种“本科生是不允许犯错误的”的观念，一旦犯错误就是对自己的否定，本科生这张招牌挂起来就不那么光彩了。因此，一开始，还不能接受领导的“棒喝”法门，把问题东推西推，想牵强附会到别人身上，还强装出一副“此事与己无干”的样子，对事情展开一番“与己无干”的耍赖分析!每每想起当时的嘴脸，心中甚是羞愧。

通过这件事，我重新反思了自己读书学习、做人、做事的态度，感悟到：

1、“一个人一生最重要的是做事做人的能力。做人要专注，做事也要专注。做事不专心，一定无法把事情做得圆满，无法清楚地掌握细节。学习就在做人、做事的点点滴滴中。经典绝不是在书本里，而是在做人、做事的点滴中。“学如逆水行舟，不进则退”，读了那么多的书，假如不融会贯通，不与生活结合，就很难有喜悦，就是古人所讲的「学而时习之，不亦乐乎。”

2、“学习最重要的境界是体悟。如果学习中不能体悟，那只是“记问之学”，就好像人吃了东西没有消化，对身体当然就没有帮助，甚至还有害处。”最近，听到一个讲座，讲座里举了一个例子，说某人毕业于某个研究所，有一天，母亲叫他处理点家事，他做完以后，母亲检查后觉得他做得不是很好，就说：“儿子，你怎么连这点小事也做不好?你怎么这么笨。”那人听后，马上脸孔变得非常凶恶，然后接着母亲说了一句话：“我都念到研究所了，你还骂我笨!研究所给了他什么?有没有给他人生的智慧，待人、处世、接物的智慧?只是给了他傲慢，给了他不受教。这点小事没办好，恰恰是学习的机会，但他并没有把握这个机会，反而对母亲的指责和批评很不能接受。事物都有一体两面，不往好处发展，就会自然地向坏处发展。听完讲座，再想想自己，也甚是惭愧!

我是多年受党教育培养的领导干部，又是普通农民的孩子，也是党培养教育长大成人的。本应为党为人民更好地工作、服务。但由于自己长期不认真学习，不认真改造世界观，淡忘了党组织，淡忘了人民，也忘记了自己是个党员领导干部。因此自己思想上逐渐发生变化。从工作上的懒惰，生活上贪图享受到极端自私的个人主义。随着地位的提高，权力的增大，忘记了各方面的监督，目无党纪国法。从开始自己占便宜，逐渐演变收受巨额贿赂和非法所得，到了不可收拾的地步。自己心理发生严重扭曲，给党和人民造成极坏的、不可挽回的恶劣影响，从而走上了严重的犯罪道路。

自己逐步走上犯罪道路的主要原因：

一是长期不认真学习，特别是党的基本理论和党纪国法;

二是长期不能接受监督，喜欢干什么就干什么，极力放纵自己;

三是唯我独行的工作作风，工作上有些成绩就狂妄自大，工作方法上往往独断专行;

四是思想懒惰，工作上讨价还价，个人利益占了上风;

五是心理不平衡，利欲熏心的赌徒心理，占有欲心理太强。

师：请大家抬起头。但是孩子们，这一切根本就没有发生过呀！他们依然在你的身边，他们依然好好地活着，你为什么要哭？你为什么要那么伤心地哭？为什么？你们想过吗？（有学生举手）不着急，请把手放下。我相信，这一幕，会在你的心中，留下很深很深的印记。那么就请你拿起笔，再换一页稿纸，把刚才发生的那一幕，用你的文字，原原本本地把它记下来。从上课的第一分钟开始，老师说了什么，你做了什么，在你做的过程当中，你感受到了什么？你想到了什么？你的同桌，你的伙伴，你要好的朋友，其他的同学，在这个过程当中，他们在说些什么？他们有一些怎么样的表现？当你面对这五个最爱的人的时候，当你一次又一次地将他们画去的时候，你的手，你的笔，仿佛……当最后两位被你画去的一刹那，你脑海里边冒出的又是怎样的画面，一段怎样的故事？孩子们，把所有的这一切都用你的文字记下来。给大家十五分钟的时间。好，开始。

（学生开始习作，教师巡视。）

（18分钟后）

师：好，孩子们，时间到了。请把手头的笔都放下，好吗？那一幕已经过去了。二十分钟的那一幕，几乎让我们每一个孩子都掉了眼泪的那一幕已经过去了。但是我说它没有过去，因为它留在了我们另一张洁白的稿纸上面，留在了我们每一个同学用自己的心声、用自己的文字把它记录下来的稿纸上面。尽管不堪回首，但是还是让我们再回一次首。（对一生）来，孩子，请你上来。

师：我请她再带着大家一起回首刚才的那一幕。请大家把笔放下，放松，凝神，然后是倾听。好的，请你开始。

生1：（读）

老师让我们在一张洁白圣洁的稿纸上写上五个（师提示：读得慢一点，行吗？）我们最爱的人。

我犹豫着，因为在这偌大的世界上，爱我的人很多，我爱的人很多。我心里落下了一块阴影。直到写下了十个汉字——妈妈，爸爸，外婆，外公和奶奶。老师说，我们写下的不只是十个汉字，十个符号。

对啊，我们写下的是亲人给我们的爱，是我们之间的情感。这纸上的那十个字，此时此刻，我感觉它们的周围散发着圣洁的光芒。随后，老师让我们画去一个。我心里的阴影开始扩散，随着的是一丝无奈。不过我还是画去了我的奶奶。毕竟我已经很长时间没和她接触了。

就这样，老师让我们不停地想，想我与这些亲人之间杂碎的片段；老师让我们不停地说，说我内心真实的感受；老师还让我们不停地流泪，流着略带咸味的眼泪。真的，我们哭了。直至画去最后一个汉字。不，它不仅是个汉字，还是一段真挚的情感。汉字周围圣洁的光不见了，取而代之的是一片黑暗。阴影笼罩着心房，心里充满了恐惧、惆怅与孤独。

来到这儿之前，我还与他们欢声笑语，感觉飞在天堂；仅仅二十分钟，我便一片茫然——我在哪儿？在茫茫的沙漠吗？我在哪儿？在茫茫的雪山吗？不，我由天堂坠入了地狱，全身被阴森的气息包裹了。

老师，你知道我们的感想吗？你知道，在你令我们画去名字时，我们的手是怎样无奈吗？你知道我们流的眼泪夹杂着怎样的东西吗？或许，这一切的一切连我自己也无法回答。

老师说，这些都是过去了，你们的亲人还在你们身边。我不知从哪儿来了一阵喜悦，从哪儿飞向了天堂。最后，我把它们化成了文字，写在洁白的稿纸上。

（全场鼓掌）

师：（让生1留在讲台上，对生2）孩子，你鼓掌了，是吧？你为什么鼓掌？

生2：因为我觉得她讲得太好了，跟我有同感。

师：哪儿有同感？

生2：同感就在她觉得，她在来这儿之前，跟家长们，跟她的亲人还是欢声笑语，像飞在天堂一样，而仅仅二十分钟以后——

师：（对生1）你说过这个话吗？说过？很好。

生2：而仅仅二十分钟以后，她又像坠入了地狱一样这种感觉。我觉得我也有这种感觉。

师：她还有几种感觉，你还记得吗？她说坠入了地狱，后面还有好几句写她感觉的话，你还记得吗？

生2：好像她后来又飞向了天堂。

师：是啊，那是在之后。而那几句话你可能忘记了，但是有一种感觉在，是吗？好的，请坐。真好。（对另一生）你也鼓掌了，是吗？

生3：我觉得我也和王馨有同感。她说她十分地恨老师，我也觉得我也十分地恨老师。

师：你可以把恨老师写进去，孩子。

生3：因为为什么我写这五个最爱的人，而又要把它画去呢？爱是留在人们心里的，（师：是）不是写在纸上的，（师：对）我们只要真诚地去爱每一个人，他们就会爱我们。（师：是）而老师却无缘无故地让我们不去爱他，这是错误的。

（全场笑，掌声）

师（对生3）：孩子，你把这些话赶紧记下来，好吗？你刚刚说过的这些话，赶紧记下来。多好的语言！只有最真实的语言，才是最美的语言。

生4：我记得刚刚王馨还说过一句话，就是她仿佛看见了五个名字旁边都闪着耀眼的光环。（师：是）我也有这样的同感——

师（对生1）：你说过这个话吗？有？好。

生4：因为每个人都有自己非常爱的人，可是突然老师又让我们画去这五个人，我觉得特别的不理解，就是为什么爱一定要把它画去呢？

师：你会理解的。但是，你应该把你现在，此时此刻的最真实的想法写到你的文字上，你刚才写了吗？写了？很好。还想请她（生1）再读一遍吗？

生：（点头）想。

师：好，我们请她再读一遍。（对众生）你们干什么？你们可以干什么？

生（齐声）：写下来。

师：对。不用我说，你们都明白了。拿起笔。是的，你可以记录。也许，那是一种你心里有的感觉，却说不出来的；也许，你有了那种感觉，你也找到了属于你自己的文字，但是当你听到了她刚才的这一番话语之后，你突然觉得她的感觉比你更加细腻，更加准确，更加深刻；也许，是在刚才的过程当中，你自己不曾感觉到的，其实不是不曾感觉，而是这种感觉被你埋得很深很深，然而听她那么一说，听她那么一读，这种感觉就像泉水一样从地底下汩汩地涌了出来。你可以记。准备。（对生1）请你再读一遍。

生1（读）：

老师让我们在一张洁白圣洁的稿纸上写上五个我们最爱的人。我犹豫着，因为在这偌大的世界上，爱我的人很多，我爱的人也很多。我心里落下了一块阴影。直到写下了十个汉字——妈妈，爸爸，外婆，外公和奶奶。

老师说，我们写下的不只是十个汉字，十个符号。对啊，我们写下的是亲人给我们的爱，是我们之间的情感。在纸上的那十个字，此时此刻，我感觉它们的周围散发着圣洁的光芒。——

师：请注意听，请注意听。（对生1）你把刚才哪句话再读一遍。

生1（读）：此时此刻，我感觉它们的周围散发着圣洁的光芒。

师：是的。此时此刻，我感觉它们的周围，这十个字的周围，这五个最爱的人的名字的周围散发着圣洁的光芒。是啊，文字不是躺在纸面上的符号，文字它是有生命的。当你的心灵敞开的时候，它是会跟你说话的。（对生1：继续）

生1（继续读）：

随后，老师让我们画去一个。我心里的阴影开始扩散，随着的是一丝无奈。不过我还是画去了我的奶奶。毕竟我已经很长时间没和她接触了。就这样，老师让我们不停地想，想我与这些亲人之间杂碎的片段；老师让我们不停地说，说我内心真实的感受；老师还让我们不停地流泪——

师：注意，三个“不停”。“老师让我们不停地想，不停地说，还让我们不停地流泪。”真好。

生1（继续读）：——流着略带咸味的眼泪。真的，我们哭了。直到画去最后一个汉字——

师：稍等。请注意，孩子们。请注意这几个字——“真的，我们哭了”，“真的，我们哭了”。很朴素的语言，却让人的心头为之一颤。所以有的时候，你不要以为堆砌了各种华丽的词藻的语言就是好的语言。不是的。有的时候，最平淡的语言，最朴素的语言，可能是最打动人的语言。

生1（继续读）：

——直至画去最后一个汉字。不，它不仅是个汉字，还是一段真挚的情感。汉字周围圣洁的光不见了——

师：回应了。跟前面呼应了。前面写下这十个汉字的时候，它们的周围有一层圣洁的光芒。而此时此刻，光芒却没有了。

生1（继续读）：

——取而代之的是一片黑暗。阴影笼罩着心房，心里充满了恐惧、惆怅与孤独——

师：三个，三个词。心里充满了——（对生1）再读一遍。

生1：心里充满了恐惧（师：恐惧），惆怅（师：惆怅），与孤独（师：孤独）。

师：第一感觉是恐惧，这是第一反应；第二反应是——（生1：惆怅）惆怅；第三反应是——（生1：孤独）孤独。这是自己内心最真实的体验。

生1（继续读）：——来到这儿之前，我还与他们欢声笑语，感觉飞在天堂——

师：这是对比，孩子们，这是她在对比。她回想刚才在进课堂之前的心情，再拿这份心情跟现在的心情相比较，你会有一种什么感觉呢？幸福的会更幸福，而痛苦的会更痛苦。这就是对比的力量。继续。

生1（继续读）：

——仅仅二十分钟，我便一片茫然——我在哪儿？在茫茫的沙漠吗？我在哪儿？在茫茫的雪山吗？不，我由天堂坠入了地狱，全身被阴森的气息包裹了。老师，你知道我们的感想吗？你知道，在你令我们画去名字时，我们的手是怎样的无奈吗？你知道我们的泪夹杂着怎样的东西吗？或许，这一切连我自己也无法回答——

师：是的，她不仅在问老师，她更是在问她自己。只有这样的文字，才能够真正打动人心。

生1（继续读）：

——老师说，这些都是过去了，你们的亲人还留在你们身边。我不知从哪儿来了一阵喜悦，从那儿飞向了天堂。最后，我把它们化成了文字，写在了洁白的稿纸上。

师：（对生1）谢谢。同学们，接下去你们应该干什么？知道吗？干什么？对，修改。

（学生修改自己的习作，师巡回。四分钟后)

师：好，请停下笔。我再请一位同学，来读一读她修改以后的文字。请大家把笔放下。（对一生）这位孩子，来，你上来。（该生轻声说自己未写完）没事，你写到哪就读到哪。（对大家）她还没有全部写完。没事，你已经很不容易了。因为不到二十分钟的时间，你已经写了将近500个字。（对大家）好，我们听好了，（做拿笔姿势）干什么？你可以干什么？（学生开始拿笔准备记录）对，对，很好。

生5（读）：五个？我一愣，继而又笑了——

师：（对生5）不着急。（对大家）“五个”后面是一个大大的——（生：问号）。问号，是。你看，这是她下笔的第一句话。五个？问号。（对生5）开始。

生5（读）：五个？我一愣，继而又笑了。写下五个我最爱的人，很容易。我略一思索，就按老师的要求写下了五个我最爱的人——

师：（打断）不着急。“写下五个最爱的人很容易”，孩子们，千万不要小看“很容易”这三个字。正是由这个时候写下的“很容易”，引起了后面的很不容易。很好。

生5（继续读）：

——写下了五个我最爱的人——妈妈，爸爸，外公，外婆和表妹琪琪。我放下笔，轻松悠闲地听老师的下一个步骤——

师：“轻松悠闲地听”，还没进入角色呢。

生5（继续读）

——“画去一个。”老师不紧不慢地说。我提笔就画掉了表妹琪琪，一点儿也不犹豫的。琪琪这个小不点有时真是挺烦人。画掉之后，我有点后悔。想起了她对我撒娇，而且还装哭的情景。不过比起其余四个人来，只好对不起你了——

师（打断）：不着急。你看，非常好的一种写法——先抑后扬。先说否定她的理由，再说难以割舍她的理由。我们请她再读一遍。

生5（继续读）：——我提笔就画掉了表妹琪琪，一点儿也不犹豫的——

师：注意听——“一点儿也不犹豫的”。

生5（继续读）：

——琪琪这个小不点有时真是挺烦人。画掉之后，我有点后悔——

师：“有点后悔”。

生5（继续读）：

——想起了她对我撒娇，并且装哭的情景——

师：想起了撒娇、装哭，多可爱的一个女孩。

生5（继续读）：

——不过比起其余四个人来，只好对不起你了——

师：话锋又一转。峰回路转，一唱三叹。

生5（继续读）：

——“再画去一个。”老师又开口了。我咬着笔尖，想了一会儿——

师：注意——“咬着笔尖，想了一会儿”，尽管她没有真咬，我相信，她是在用心咬。

生5（继续读）：

——画去了外婆。我突然很想跑到教室外面去大哭一场。外婆，从一岁时就开始带我，直到我五岁时上小学。我很郁闷——

师：“很郁闷”。

生5（继续读）：

——干嘛一定要非要做一个如此痛苦的抉择呢？我刚放下笔，就听到同桌的抽泣声，他刚刚画去了奶奶——

师：注意，她写了同桌的反应。这叫渲染。

生5（继续读）：

——他刚画去了奶奶，正沉浸在痛苦之中。“再画去一个。”依然是很平静的声音。有没有搞错——

师：“依然是很平静的声音”，其实已经很不平静了。

生5（继续读）：

——有没有搞错？如果不是上课，我想我早就跳起来并且尖叫了。我非常艰难地开始分析：妈妈？不行，是妈妈把我带到这个世界上的。妈妈是我生命中睁开眼睛第一个看到的人。妈妈那不化妆的脸总是堆满了微笑。爸爸？不行。爸爸喜欢宠溺地喊我“小丫头”，爸爸喜欢给我买下一切我喜欢的东西。外公？大概只能画掉他了吧？我缓慢地移动着细细的笔尖——

师：“缓慢地移动”，孩子们，注意听，“移动”这个词，（做艰难移动的手势）“移动”这个词。很轻的笔啊，很细的笔尖，然而在这儿却成了“移动”。

生5（继续读）：

——任它像一把小刀一样割着我的心。眼前又是那个阴冷的清明节，灰色的墓碑前放着一束白色的百合——

师：画面出来了。画面出来了。

生5（继续读）

——眼中总有一些温热的液体在打着旋。（轻声说：就写到这里）

师：好。就写到这儿，已经足以让人感动了。我想应该会有掌声的。

（全场鼓掌）

20XX年X月X日中午一点零三分,我在给老婆的电话中因意见不和一反平日的温文尔雅,声嘶力竭﹑大喊大叫,并且在讲完后重重的扣上了电话.从表面上看,这只是一次普通的夫妻争吵,但是在该事件的背后隐藏着严重的原则性问题,并且此事深深伤害了老婆的心.老婆,我错了,请你原谅我,对造成这一恶性事件的原因我分析如下:

一、违背了”老婆永远是对的”之根本原则

丈夫守则第一条中明确规定:老婆永远是对的.也就是老婆的话就是命令,对于老婆的观点意图决定丈夫只能认同接受与执行,不存在判断对错的过程,没有任何商量的余地,更不能反对或反抗.

我在电话中大吵大嚷还摔电话这一恶劣行径从根本上违背了这一原则,这首先说明在我的内心深处并没有完完全全认同这一原则,在老婆表达观点或发出指令时本能的进行了愚蠢的反对,并没有形成正确的条件反射.

其次,说明我执行力低下,没有顾全夫妻团结大局先执行最高原则,这也是对最高原则认识不深的一个体现.

由于这两点原因,我违背了最高原则,犯下了如此严重的错误,不可饶恕,不可饶恕!

二、忽略了老婆容易受伤的心

这是除了原则性之外最严重的问题.老婆是我最爱的人,我应该捧在手心呵护倍至,让她时刻感受到温暖.但是我却冲她大喊大叫,这严重伤了宝贝老婆的心,老婆伤心难免心情不好或情绪不稳定,这有可能导致内分泌失调,长此以往会导致皮肤加速变老甚至更年期提前,甚至影响到老婆对我的信任,这对一个团结和睦的家庭来说是一个巨大的隐患,而我则是这一隐患的罪魁祸首,这就是问题的严重所在,我错了,毫无争议!

三、不懂得自爱

我的恶劣行径不仅深深伤害了老婆的感情,也损害了自己在老婆面前的个人形象,造成我家庭地位与无形资产进一步下降与流失.不懂得自爱也就不懂得真正爱别人,不懂得尊重自己爱护自己也就无法从根本上尊重老婆爱护老婆,这涉及到一个人的道德观与品质,这一点我的确存在着问题,这些问题在我犯错误的时候推波助澜.

四、损害公务,制造噪音

打电话是我个人的事,但是我却粗暴操作单位电话机,造成电话机折旧加速使用寿命缩短,并且存在故障隐患;

同时,由于我在午休时间大声喧哗,制造了噪音,污染了环境,影响了周围办公室同事的休息,间接破坏了我们部门在公司当中的形象;

亲爱的宝贝老婆女超人,我错了,无论如何我不该对你大吵大嚷,我是大猪大猴子大狗屎大水怪大彪人大坏蛋,我最坏了,你就别跟我生气了,为了家庭的团结和睦你就原谅我这次吧,我保证再也不犯这样的错误了,为了弥补我的罪过,以后我给老婆端茶倒水洗衣做饭工资全交家务全干,保证你的心情舒畅保养你的靓丽容颜,保证你开开心心舒舒坦坦,时时刻刻感受到温暖!

老婆,原谅我吧!

作为人民百姓，我们只能管好自己，对大局却无能为力，而案件的发生直接影响到切身的利益，不免心中黯然神伤、倍感不安和焦虑。借此机会，说上几句想说的话，不管是声大还是音小，不管是动听还是刺耳，姑且算是对单位尽到的一份责任吧! 首先我想说点儿发挥警示教育的案例，现将查处的11起典型案件如下：

1、杭州淳安县卫生局副局长王雪峙为儿子大办婚宴违规收受礼金问题。

2、宁波国家高新区梅墟街道办事处主任曹晋民公务用餐饮酒问题。

3、温州市瓯海区郭溪街道凰桥村支部书记任巧娒组织人员赴京公款旅游问题。

4、湖州市南浔区练市镇工业园区办主任、招商局局长沈卫星，经济发展办主任、工业园区办副主任徐宁峰等人公款旅游问题。

5、嘉兴桐乡市崇福镇芝村村村委会副主任盛金春等人公款旅游问题。

6、绍兴市柯桥区(原绍兴县)台办主任李放鸣公款宴请及公款购买赠送购物卡问题。

7、金华磐安县食品药品监督管理局药械监管科科长陈念华、保化科科长朱剑辉违规接受宴请等问题。

8、衢州常山县职业中专校长符水禄、工会主席余文祥违规发放月饼问题。

9、舟山市普陀区民族宗教事务局副局长郭春穗收受礼卡及参与由服务对象支付费用的旅游活动的问题。

10、台州仙居县民政局公款购买赠送土特产问题。

11、丽水缙云县新碧街道宅基村党支部副书记刘启均等人公款旅游问题。

上述11起典型案件，有的借婚嫁收取礼金，有的收送礼券礼卡，有的公款吃喝，有的公款旅游，有的用公款购买赠送土特产及月饼，有的接受服务对象的宴请，有的参与由服务对象支付费用的旅游活动，均违反了中央八项规定精神和省委有关作风建设的具体要求。对这些案件予以严肃处理，充分体现了贯彻落实八项规定精神、反对“四风”的鲜明态度和坚定决心。

制度本身是不成问题的，可为什么我们有章不循，有规不行呢?完备的规章制度只是为防止违规案件的发生提供了可能。要想规章制度真正发挥其功能，在现行的体制下，公务员之间相互监督机制是不现实的。关键要看管理层是否对工作有高度的责任感，是否真抓实干。还是“出了事就发烧，完了事就拉倒”，只做表面文章，使内控管理流于形式。我们的政府不缺乏制度，也不缺乏管理机构，我们真正缺少的是实事求是、真抓实干的精神和作风，缺少的是对银行高度负责的责任心。

其次说点儿“人”的事儿。就像门锁挡君子档不住窃贼一样，规章制度再好“人”不执行也是没用的。我们的公务员无论是为官的还是为民的，从自身的角度讲，出现违规违纪甚至违法问题，都是没做好“人”，说白了，就是自身的头脑出了问题。在政府工作，天天支配人，如果滋生贪心，膨胀私欲，稍有可乘之机，难免不下水。另外，一个人的品德习性不好也会走下道，“吃喝嫖赌吸”，过分追求奢华的生活，总有缺钱的时候，没钱时就不好办了。

如平时多学习学习，明白的道理多了，法制观念就增强了，人的胆儿也就小了。再就是没事时多反思反思，是非观念正确了，人的心态慢慢就平和了，遵章守纪也就

顺理成章了。我们普通百姓虽然只能管好自己，但这也很重要，如果人人都能做到这一点，就不用担心案件了。要记装愚昧的人‘胆大’，智慧的人‘胆携”。还是最一个聪明、智慧的人吧!

尊敬的领导：

今天我怀着无比愧疚和懊悔的心情，给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对上班上网这种不良行为的深刻认识，以及再也不在上班的时候上网的决心。

对不起!我犯的是一个严重的原则性问题。我知道，领导对于我的擅自离岗非常生气。我也知道，对于一名教师，保证上班期间做有关教育教学的事是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我渐渐的认识到自己将要为自己的行为付出代价了。领导严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我深为震撼，也已经深刻的认识到事已至此的严重性。如今，大错既成，我懊悔不已。深刻检讨，认为在本人的思想中已深藏了致命的错误：平时生活作风懒散，如果不是因为过于懒散也不至于如此。为了更好的认识错误，也是为了让领导能够相信我能够真正的改正自己的错误，保证不再重犯，我将自己所犯的错误归结如下：

1.在同事们中间造成了不良的影响，由于我在上班的时候上网，有可能影响学校纪律性，让其他同事也上网，都没有好好的做教育，这实际上也是对学生的不负责。

2.影响个人综合水平的提高，使自身在本能提高的条件下为能提高.如今错已铸成，我深感懊悔，深刻检讨自己的错误。

3.思想觉悟不高，对错误的认识不足，试想如果当时我就认识到此事的严重性，错误就不可能发生。

对于以上的错误，我已经深深的认识到了它们的严重性，为了更好的向领导检讨自己，我特提出以下几点改正意见，好让自己和领导同事督促自己改正我的错误：

1.向领导认错。既然自己已经犯了错，我就应该去面对，要认识到自己的错误，避免以后犯同样的错误。所以，我写下这篇深刻的检讨，向领导表明我认错的决心。

2.提高纪律性。我应该认真学习单位规章制度，并且做到自觉遵守。不迟到，不早退。有事应该先向领导请假。

对于自己所犯的错误，我已经深刻的认识到了它的严重性，特写下这篇检讨，让领导提出批评，并希望得到领导的原谅。并且向领导保证我以后不会再犯以上的错误。我的这份工作实在是来之不易，我不仅为工作侵入了大量的心血，而且也承载了父母的期望。希望领导能够给我一次改正错误的机会，并且真心的接受领导的批评和教诲。同时希望领导在往后的时光里能够监督我，提醒我。我一定不会再让领导失望了。

检讨人：

日期：

尊敬的XXX老师:

今天我怀着愧疚和懊悔给您写下这份检讨书,以向您表示我对迟到这种不良行为的深刻认识以及再也不迟到的决心。于是我一再告诉自己要把此事当成头等大事来抓，不能辜负老师对我们的一片苦心。

早在我踏进校门,老师就已三申五令,一再强调,全班同学不得迟到。但是我还是多次迟到。关于迟到的事情，我觉得有必要说一说。我觉得我向您所说的这些原因是不充分的。虽然我知道这种行为也是不对的，但是我还是做了，所以，我觉得有必要而且也是应该向老师做出这份书面检讨，让我自己深深的反省一下自己的错误。

对不起,老师!我犯的是一个严重的原则性的问题。我知道，老师对于我的迟到也非常的生气。我也知道，对于学生，保证课按时到校是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我渐渐的认识到自己要付出代价了。老师反复教导言犹在耳,严肃认真的表情犹在眼前,我深为震撼,也已经深刻的认识到事已至此的重要性。如今,大错既成,我深深懊悔不已。我平时生活作风懒散,如果不是因为过于懒散也不至于如此。为了更好的认识错误，也是为了让老师你能够相信学生我能够真正的改正自己的错误，保证不再重犯。

一个人的犯错误，有可能造成影响班级纪律性，年级纪律性，对学校的纪律也是一种破坏，而且给对自己抱有很大期望的老师，家长也是一种伤害。每一个学校都希望自己的学生做到品学兼优，全面发展，树立良好形象，也使我们的学校有一个良好形象。每一个同学也都希望学校给自己一个良好的学习环境来学习，生活。包括我自己也希望可以有一个良好的学习环境，但是一个良好的学习环境靠的是大家来共同维护来建立起来的，而我自己这次却犯了错误，去破坏了学校的良好环境，是很不应该的，若每一个同学都这样犯错，那么是不会有良好的学习环境形成，对违反校规的学生给予惩罚也是应该的，自己想了很多，也意识到自己犯了很严重错误，我知道，造成如此大的损失，我应该为自己的犯的错误付出代价，我也愿意要承担尽管是承担不起的责任，尤其是作在重点学教育的人，在此错误中应负不可推卸的主要责任。

我不想像许多人那样写虚伪的检讨，检讨只是一份死物，改正错误不是靠写检讨，而是靠实际行动!只有真真切切认识到自己的错误，才能改正错误。任何事情都有一个过程，改正错误也有一个过程，而这份检讨将是我的一个监督，一个警钟，监督我一步一步踏踏实实地改正所犯的错误!同时也感谢老师给我机会，我一定用自己的行动来证明自己的决心。

相信老师看到我这个态度也可以知道我对这次事件有很深刻的悔过态度，相信我的悔过之心，我的行为不是向老师的纪律进行挑战，是自己的一时失足，希望老师可以原谅我的错误，我也会向你保证此事不会再有第二次发生。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

你们好，很遗憾地向你们递交这份考试没考好的检讨书。关于我此次的期中考试我未能取得预期的成绩，我感到深深地自责。我绝对有些对不起父母的关心和老师的教导，特此递交这份检讨书，表达我的歉意。

关于我此次期中考试的成绩不理想，我总结了如下几点原因：

第一，我的学习态度不好。在上半学期的学习当中，因为有时候上课不听讲，思想开小差常常错过老师讲到的知识点，也耽误了学习。

第二，我在课后没有及时复习，在上半学期的学习当中要说我上课不听讲还可以在课后通过写练习题弥补过来，但因为总总原因我还是没有去补习回来，因此对于不懂的知识点没有深入分析和理解。

第三，是我的压力过大，其实这份压力不仅仅是父母施加的，父母对我的要求是对我的关心，是希望我有好的成绩，将来能够有出息。但我却辜负了父母，以至于考试时候心情紧张，握笔的手都会因为做不出试题而瑟瑟发抖。

关于我此次成绩不好的原因还有很多的，但归根结底我此次未能考好期中考试的事实已经摆在眼前了，我在反省检讨错误的同时，我已经将目光投入在了期末考试。

在此递上这份考试没考好的检讨书，恳求父母和老师的原谅。

在昨天的数学第二次月考中，我没有取得优异的成绩，只考了90分而已，我错的全不是我不该错的，我全部都会，例如：填空题的比忘了简化;求比值的得数算错了;应用题没认真审题……连这次考试中较难的题我都会了，可是，却因为骄傲而马虎，没有取得理想成绩。这对我来说是不应该的。尽管这次考试没有100，我承认我很骄傲，期中考试取得全班第一名就飘飘然了，其实我忍不住会骄傲，但这次确实骄傲的过了头了。我写这份检讨书，并不是希望您原谅我，我是要激励自己，不能过于骄傲自满，尽管老师前一天说考得不是月考，我没有复习前面的内容，但这也是原因的其中之一，最大的原因还是因为我骄傲自满。我相信您不是一个盲目批评的母亲，您也曾经说过，不是每一次考试都能反映出真实水平，考试只是一个测验，关键还是在平时多巩固、多积累。所以，我决定：不再骄傲!下次一定取得好成绩!我也会仔细审题，把这一教训牢记在心!下次，绝对努力!请妈妈相信我。

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

尊敬的老师：

您好!

您好!

一，作为一个学生，上课是我的义务，也是我的最基本的责任。一个学生，他不上课，如何能获得知识，他如何能与同学们进行交流，他如何能够继续努力进步?上课是我获得知识的最重要的途径，然而我却没有意识到这一点，罔顾学校的规章制度，无视班级的管理条例，这是我的第一大错。

二，私自脱逃，无视班委的存在。班委是经过选举被选出来的有出色能力和富有责任感的同学，他们兢兢业业的服务同学管理班级，他们勤勤恳恳默默无闻的为班级贡献了他们的汗水和努力，他们是班级的引领者。作为一个有责任心的班委，做好考勤工作，确认每一个缺席的同学都有不出席理由是他们的职责，而我，一个做出了令人发指的行为的拖班级后腿的学生，没有对自己的早退行为做出任何解释，让班委替我承担了如此重大的责任，此为第二大错。我愧对于班委的无私奉献，愧对于他们的勤奋拼搏，和他们相比，更加反衬出我的愚昧无知，无组织无纪律。

如果时间能够重来，那么，在那一刻，我绝对不会选择早退，如果时光能够重来，那么，在那一刻，我必定坚守自己的意志，抑制逃跑的冲动，如果时光能够重来，那么，在那一刻，人性的光辉一定会洗涤我蒙尘的心灵，教导我如何做一个称职的学生。然而，时光不能重来。因此我，在认识到自己的错误之后，唯有向您保证，我绝对不会再犯相同的错误。

检讨人：ooo

20oo年o月o日

亲爱的，这是我第一次给你写检讨书，这是我用心写的，都是真的，我从来没有骗过你，我记得以前你叫我写我就不写，我是个男的耶，我也不怕什么丢脸不丢脸的，反正我是不要脸的，我也不怕他们说一个大男人写着东西，反正我只在乎你的感受。

以前你总说我为什么空间没有写你的日志，呵呵，不是我想写啊!而是我把我们在一起的幸福快乐的每一天都记在心里，我不是不愿写。我是个男的啊，老写这东西会被人笑话的，虽然说我厚脸皮，但是还是害羞啊!呵呵，你肯定想说既然怕，那这次还写做怎么，反正这次我是不要脸的啊!

亲爱的，我知道我不够体贴你，有时候也不温柔，但我的心是爱你的，我敢写就不怕被笑，虽然我有时候会说一些不好听的话来气你，是因为我在乎你啊!我怕你会离开我啊!我跟你说过那些东西不是我故意留在的，也不是故意给你看，让你生气的，你老不相信我，我知道你为了家里的事都已经很累啊!我确不知道体谅你，我错啦!我对你是认真的，我从一开始都没有骗过你，那都是过去，我希望你不要想多啦!我心里真的没有第二个啊!心里只有你一个啊!我真的只爱你一个，你不要在生我的气啦!好不好?真的没有啊，你相信我好不啊!你老问我喜欢你什么，其实你温柔贤良，勤奋聪颖，是个好女人好老婆，其实是我最不好啊!我态度轻狂，举止乖张，老不体谅你的好，是我不好，都是我的错，亲爱的，你就大人有大量，别生气啊!

：

老师是园丁，我们是祖国的花朵。下面是小编给大家整理的数学考试没考好检讨书的内容，欢迎大家查看。

尊敬的老师：

您好!首先，我在此向你说一声对不起，我辜负了您对我的殷切希望。在这次期末数学考试中我惨败而归，不仅伤透了你的心，也让我无地自容。这次失败的原因，我分析了一下试卷，有绝大部分是由于我的马虎粗心造成的，但也有少数部分我不懂。您平常也就经常告诫我们，可我就是改不了粗心大意的毛病。不过，我不应该给我自己找理由，放心，老师，我会改正的。另外，在平时，我总是沉迷与电脑游戏，上课不认真听讲。在这一个假期里，我一定会痛改前非的。在这个假期里，我一定要腾出一部分时间来复习我的数学，我想好了，每天早上9：00——11：00来学习2个小时的数学。还有，我建立了1个错题本。以后，一旦有什么不懂的问题或错误的问题我都会记录下来的。并且，如果有什么弄不懂的问题，我会在百度知道里提出来的。同时，我要经常在好好学习这个贴吧里去了解一些学习数学的方法。并且我不能偏科，一定要全面发展。

老师，我知道，仅仅是语言是苍白无力的。放心，我绝对会以自己的实际行动来履行我的诺言的。我决定了，我开学考试的数学成绩一定不能下110分。同时，我要在年级的名词保持在前10内。

老师，请不要生气了。看我的实际行动把!

这次考试没考好，我自知这是不能原谅的，由于自己年纪小，心里自控能力比较差，有的时候上课不能控制自己，没办法好好听讲，我自己已经好好反省过了。

这次的考试我退步了，使我感到十分的痛苦与遗憾，学习本身是为了自己，而老师您却又如此的认真负责，对我严格的要求，而我却还考出这成绩让我感到十分的愧疚，我真心的反思与改过，我总结了失败的教训，我一定会在以后的学习中全力以赴，认真专心，尽我全力考出我自己真实的水平，我一定会化悲痛为力量，努力奋斗，不辜负您对我的希望，对得起我自己的真实水平!真心的反思，望老师能原谅!

我觉得我不能跳楼，我有责任，有义务为自己为家长老师好好学习，报效祖国!

我也很感谢老师，老师一直都很关心我，可是我却没有能够把握自己的方向，没能正确的对待学习，我想老师一定也会不高兴，因为老师是关心我们的，我们是老师的学生。

老师是园丁，我们是祖国的花朵。我享受的老师的教导，深知老师的辛苦，今天，我下定决心，一定会好好学习，不辜负老师家长对我的希望。老师是如此的辛苦。为了学生的前途，付出了自己的辛劳，我们看着这样辛苦的老师心里也是很不忍的，所以，我了解了，也明白了，对于现在的我们，学习才是正确的。也许以后的我们早会忘记了现在的游戏，也忘了老师曾经讲过的东西。但我不过忘记我曾经在学校努力过，奋斗过，也不会忘了有一位老师，曾经辛勤的教导过我。所以，以后的学习中我一定要努力的学习。

对不起，老师!我犯的是一个严重的原则性的问题。我知道，老师对于我的考试成绩也非常的生气。我也知道，对于学生，保证每天好好听课，不走神，认真复习是一项最基本的责任，也是最基本的义务。但是我却连最基本的都没有做到。事后，我冷静的想了很久，我渐渐的认识到自己将要为自己的冲动付出代价了。老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我深为震撼，也已经深刻的认识到事已至此的重要性。如今，大错既成，我深深懊悔不已。深刻检讨，认为在本人的思想中已深藏了致命的错误：思想觉悟不高，本人对他人的尊重不够，以后我将对老师有更多的尊重。对重要事项重视严重不足。平时生活作风懒散，如果不是因为过于懒散也不至于如此。为了更好的认识错误，也是为了让老师你能够相信学生我能够真正的改正自己的错误，保证不再重犯，我将自己所犯的错误归结如下：

老师您曾经教导过我：考不满100分自己跳楼。您可知你说的话在我心里是这么重要!我仍记得您说这句话的时候的语气。我一辈子也不会忘记您曾对我的教诲。

可当时的我，竟如此糊涂!!!我后悔当时没有听您的话，现在我怀着沉痛的心情忏悔我的错误。圣经说：每一个人都有原罪，您正努力消除着，因为您不止是为了自己活着。而是为了教育事业，是的，您是为了全人类而努力。而我，我不想说自己了，我实在是罪不可恕，我没有好好对待学习，也没有好好对待生活，更没有好好对待自己，更对不起您，对不起为我付出过的人。

我有思想上的错误：对于这一门课程的重视不够。对于这一点，我开始反省的时候并没有太在意，但是，经过深刻的反省，我终于认识到了，这个错误才是导致我成绩不好的重要原因。试问：如果我很喜欢这门课程，我自己会上课走神吗?这个错误也反映到了我平时没有旷课的课堂效率上。很多我不感兴趣的课程，往往我并没有自始自终的专心听讲，这种行为虽然没有扰乱同学和老师的教与学，但是这对于自己来说，却是一个严重的错误。对于学校开设的每一门课程都有学校的理由，我们作为学生就更应该去认真学习。

现在，我正式的向您保证，这种错误，不会有下一次了，下一次不用您说，我会履行我的誓言……。

在寒假，我做了一些不好的事。现在，我很后悔，所以，我写了这份检讨书。来检讨我自己。

1、沉迷于手机和电视。

寒假里，我经常玩手机，把大量的学习时间都浪费掉了。现在的我已经开始后悔了，后悔为什么在寒假里经常玩手机。

2、经常睡懒觉。

在寒假里，我每天不仅睡的迟，连第二天醒得也迟。唉，这到底是怎么回事？天呐。我不该这样。原本，我早一点起来的话，还可以看课外书，增长些知识，也可以预习一下课文。无论如何，也比睡懒觉好太多了。

我从现在开始，都应该好好检讨检讨自己，不该沉迷于游戏，不该睡懒觉。

我应该在6点半时起床，读读课文，看看书，不该总是玩游戏，因为这样不仅对眼睛不好，反而还有一些不适合我们的视频跳出来，真是恶心。

我还可以多跟着妈妈出去跑跑步，购物等等，也可以去买些试卷啊，补习书之类的东西做做看。

我还可以用玩手机的时间来写一天中生活中的趣事以及人，我要天天早点起床。

总知，我要尽量改正我的缺点，让我的优点越来越多。

尊敬的领导：

作为一名武警执勤哨位工作人员，我在执勤时候玩手机犯了严重的工作违纪问题。在此针对我的错误做出反省与检讨，以最大程度的挖掘错误根源，细究我个人错误责任，争取能够有效改正错误，重新恢复良好工作作风。

首先，我要陈述一下错误的具体情况：当天下午，我刚上执勤哨位两小时左右以后，当时我见周围没有进入大门的来客，于是便掏出手机就玩起了游戏，大致事情就是这样子。

现如今，经过领导的严肃批评，提高了我对于自身这个错误的觉悟。我充分得意识到了错误的严重性，作为一名武警部队的执勤哨兵，站在门岗上就是在某种层面上代表着武警部队形象。武警部队是怎么样的一只部队呢?那是一只保护群众生命财产安全强而有力的力量，武警的形象应该是坚而有力、无坚不摧、勇猛向前，作为武警部队门前哨岗我就应该在自身工作上体现出这一份形象。而我却在执勤期间玩手机，这手机是什么玩意呢?这些个智能手机尽管是一些通信高科技产品，带有一些趣味游戏，可是里面还充斥着大量无聊、无意义、无趣、嬉笑小儿科的糟粕信息啊。因此手机可以在一定程度上被视为一种游戏机，那么我作为武警执勤哨兵在岗位执勤时候手持“游戏机”(完全可以想象一下，那副情景是多么令人不知所然)，这是一个什么样的性质呢?——经过领导点拨，确实令我豁然开朗，不禁意间我有了哭泣的冲动，还是领导您说的是。

总而言之，一名武警哨兵倘若执勤当中出现玩手机的形象，那至少代表了这名哨兵多么薄弱的意志品质呢?这是坚决不可取的。

这次错误以后，我深感懊悔与愧疚。我知道“年纪轻“、”刚刚踏上工作岗位”、“思想觉悟素质不高”、“意志品质薄弱”、“赶时髦亲时尚”等诸多借口都显得是那么幼稚与轻薄。自己绝不能轻易得避过这次错误，我自己都无法轻易绕过自己。我应该从错误当中牢牢吸取教训。.本文原创出自检讨书100分，亲，别忘记哦!.经过这几日彻夜的、深刻的反省，我怀着严肃的心情，认真得写下了这篇检讨。而我很清楚，一篇检讨书仅凭文字不能够完全形容出我悔恨的心情，检讨书也只是文字，对于错误的改正并没有真正务实的督促。可是我还是要写，这是为什么呢?因为我要向领导坦实得表达我的思想改正状况，只有我思想上真正改正端正了，今后才能强而有力的保证错误的完善改正。

检讨人：XXX

时间：2015.8.18