检检讨书分几个部分【推荐20篇】

尊敬的医院领导：

您好!很抱歉我直到现在才交这份检讨书给您。这几天我一直在思考着怎么写好这份检讨书，一份好的检讨书代表着一份真诚实意，在思考的同时我也在深深的反省着自己的行为，真的深感愧疚!

认真、负责和遵守纪律是每个工作者最基本的工作态度。但是我最近因为个人私事而连连失职耽误了工作。上班迟到还旷工，虽然有些客观因素的存在，例如：公交车误点，路上塞车等等，但主观原因还是我个人因素：时间观念不够强，没能合理安排时间;岗位责任意识不强;工作态度不够认真;思想不成熟不分事情轻重。

因为我的失职，耽误了工作进展和影响了工作效率，给各位同事带来了诸多不便和困扰，真的很对不起!大错已成我懊悔不已，我唯有对自己进行了深刻的检讨，加之同事、领导的教导沟通让我加强了工作责任心，意识到岗位的重要性，端正了工作态度。

很感谢领导再给我一次机会，我不会因挨了领导的批评就心里不服产生怨气消极怠工的，反而这让我端正了自己，我保证以后认真工作尽量避免再犯同样的错误!

检讨人：XXX

时间：2015

尊敬的老师：

我怀着十分的愧疚写下这份检讨书，以表示我对在昨天上课的迟到进行自我检讨。

我们上课时间是八点半，而我大约是早上八点三十五到的，迟到了五分钟左右。对此我表示十分的抱歉。这是因为在前一天晚上，我由于赶作业赶到凌晨四点多才去睡觉，定了早上七点半的闹钟，但在闹钟响后由于太困了，所以我按掉后又躺了一会才起床，因此才迟到了。

解释这些并不是为了说明我并没有做错，只是想说明我并不是故意要迟到的。迟到的确是迟到了，我的确是不应该在闹钟响后又放纵自己又躺了一会，这是不对的，在时间上我没有做到严格的要求自己，影响老师们的正常上课也对其它同学正常上课造成了不好的影响，为此我表示十分的抱歉。通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，生活涣散的必然结果。对此我感到十分的不应该，我深刻的反省过自己，在以后遇到类似的情况一定会更加注意，不会因为一时的疲劳而对自己放松了要求，一定不给大家带来麻烦。

尊敬的xxx：

x月x 日，在工作中，我不仅没有认真投入工作，还......，并被领导发现。几天来，我认真反思，深刻自剖，为自己的行为感到了深深地愧疚和不安，在此，我谨向各位领导做出深刻检讨，并将我几天来的思想反思结果向领导汇报如下：

通过这件事，我感到这虽然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长期以来对自己放松要求，工作做风涣散的必然结果，也是与我们时代要求树新风，讲文明，背道而行。经过几天的反思，我对自己这些年的工作成长经历进行了详细回忆和分析。记得刚上班的时候，我对自己的要求还是比较高的，时时处处也都能遵守相关规章制度，从而努力完成各项工作。但近年来，由于工作逐渐走上了轨道，而自己对单位的一切也比较熟悉了，尤其是领导对我的关怀和帮助使我感到温暖的同时，也慢慢开始放松了对自己的要求，反而认为自己已经做得很好了。因此，这次发生的事使我不仅感到是自己的耻辱，更为重要的是我感到对不起领导对我的信任，愧对领导的关心

同时，在这件事中，我还感到，自己在工作责任心上仍就非常欠缺。众所周知，服务行业一定要有规范的行为准则，工作时间我却XXXX，这充分说明，我从思想上没有把工作的方式方法重视起来，这也说明，我对自己的工作没有足够的责任心，也没有把自己的工作做得更好，也没给自己注入走上新台阶的思想动力。在自己的思想中，仍就存在得过且过，混日子的应付思想。现在，我深深感到，这是一个非常危险的倾向，也是一个极其不好的苗头，如果不是领导及时发现，并要求自己深刻反省，而放任自己继续放纵和发展，那么，后果是极其严重的，甚至都无法想象会发生怎样的工作失误。因此，通过这件事，在深感痛心的同时，我也感到了幸运，感到了自己觉醒的及时，这在我今后的人生成长道路上，无疑是一次关键的转折。所以，在此，我在向领导做出检讨的同时，也向你们表示发自内心的感谢。

__

花自飘零水自流，一次自习，不遵守班规，让老师您心翻忧愁。此愁难消在心头，在此，为我们的无知，特向您检讨。

道德，在自习课上违反班规使用手机固然不对，而造成这一现象的直接原因即是我们的自我约束力较差，而间接原因是近期临近学校艺术节，我和几位同学们在排练节目，刚开始虽只要我们几个人，但之后却造成另外部分同学的效仿，形成了不良风气，为此我深感抱歉。

其次我也深刻认识到自己的错误，因为思想的一时疏忽而造成了这一系列的错误。试想，如果我当时多思考一下，认识到事情的严重性，错误就不会发生，不过即然发生了，就要有勇气去承担自己所犯下的错，并秉持不再犯类似的错误的思想，做好自己。

这个周末，天气似乎犹为的不好，不禁在仅有的阳光下抬起头，注视那茫茫浓雾中的一缕细微的阳光。有人说，仰望天空其实是一个寂寞的姿势，当一个人在茫茫红尘中寻求不到心灵上的安慰时，便会寄情于冰蓝色的天空。的确，如果不是这一份检讨点醒了我应该去好好努力的学习，或许下一秒的时间就补我凭空度过。最近的学习状态很不好，我也在写这一份检讨书的过程中，反省了这段时间很多的不足，也希望老师同学们能够监督我做到以下几点：

1、 在学习过程中，认真听讲，做好笔记;

2、 遵守班规，严格遵守规章制度;

3、 听众老师的安排，不擅自作主张。

漫漫人生路，总会错几步，我们只有认真反思，寻找错误后面深刻的根源，认清问题的本质，才能从错误中得到，从而改正并进步!

只要我们每个人都有很好的约束力，自主学习自力，在自习课上就没有任何理由、借口咪我们所做错的事而辩解。

最后，也请老师、同学们监督我，做到更好，更优秀!

谢谢!

__

年月日

根据x财字【201x】21号文件精神和主管部门有关要求，我校接到通知后，立即召开了教育干部、教职工代表会议，认真学习文件精神，明确了清理范围、清理的主要内容、方法步骤、具体政策把握、工作要求和进行这项工作的重大意义。通过学习，我们统一了思想，提高了认识。

一、高度重视，周密安排

为确保此次自查自纠工作顺利开展，我校对规范津贴补贴工作高度重视，认真组织全校教职工认真学习文件精神，将教职工的思想认识统一到党中央和国家要求的高度上，同时从各年级抽调业务骨干组成专项自查小组，对我校是否存在违反规定发放各种补贴、奖金的行为进行清理和自查，明确了责任要求，确保工作落到实处。

二、依法依规，严格执行

根据文件精神，我校认真对照《规定》的总体要求，对我校津贴补贴发放情况进行全面自查。在自检自查工作中，没有违反《规定》各项规定。具体执行情况如下：

1、我校自执行绩效工资制度，严格按校教育体育局的相关规定正常发放津贴补贴，无自行新设津贴补贴项目，无自行提高其他津贴补贴标准和扩大实施范围情况，无自行扩大有关经费开支范围和提高开支标准发放津贴补贴、奖金，发放有价证券、实物或报销相关费用等。

2、我单位无 “小金库”、非税收入现象;无利用“小金库”和非税收入发放津贴补贴情况。

3、我单位人员津贴补贴严格按照批复的相应职级津贴补贴标准执行。

4、对已发放的属于国家统一规定的津贴补贴，严格按照国家有关文件规定的项目、标准和实施范围执行，无违规情况。

三、提高认识，确保长效

我校在规范津贴补贴工作上，始终认真贯彻落实我县规范津贴补贴的各项政策，杜绝了利用公用经费、“小金库”资金发放津贴、补贴、奖金、福利等现象，取消了以各种名目滥发奖励性补贴、通讯补贴和节日补贴。

通过此次规范津贴补贴自检自查工作，我校在今后的工作中会不断严肃财经纪律，巩固现有规范津贴补贴工作成果，确保津贴补贴规范长效有序，并将我校津贴补贴工作机制同党风廉政建设和校务公开工作有机结合起来，保证财务支出公开上墙，接受我校教职工和社会各界的监督。为规范津贴补贴工作创造条件，确保规范工作继续顺利向前。

XX小学

20XX年5月7日

我怀着十二万分的愧疚以及十二万分的懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对没有完成作业这种恶劣行为的深痛恶绝及打死也不再重犯这种错误的决心。

我已经深刻认识到此事的重要性，于是我一再告诉自己要把老师交待的作业当成头等大事来抓，不能辜负老师对我们的一片苦心。

对于我没有完成作业的事情，所造成的严重后果如下：

1.让老师为我的学习更加操心。

2.在同学们中间造成了不良的影响。

3.由于我的错误，有可能造成别的同学的效仿，也是对别的同学的父母的不负责。

如今，大错既成，我深深懊悔不已。经过深刻检讨，认为深藏在本人思想中的致命错误有以下几点：

1、 思想觉悟不高，对重要事项重视严重不足。就算是有认识，也没能在行动上真正实行起来。

2、 思想觉悟不高的根本原因是因为本人对他人尊重不足。试想，如果我对老师有更深的尊重，我就会按时完成老师教代的每项作业

据上，我决定有如下个人整改措施：

1、 按照老师要求缴纳保质保量的检讨书一份!对自己思想上的错误根源进行深挖细找的整理，并认清其可能造成的严重后果。

2、 制定学习计划，认真完成老师交给的每项作业

3. 和同学们加强沟通。争取和全班同学共同进步

请老师看我今后的表现，我保证不再出现上述错误。

学生：

日期：

：

尊敬的领导您好： 由于思想重视不够、律己不严，在我身上出现了“乱扔垃圾”错误行为，尽管我不是故意的行为，但造成了较为严重的不良影响。认真反思之后，我觉得现在强调任何理由，都只是托词，我怀着万分的愧疚给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对乱扔垃圾这种错误行为的懊悔和再不出现同类行为的决心。

一、我的反思 1、 放松思想觉悟、没有严格要求和约束自己是这次错误发生的主要原因。对规章制度的重视严重不足。就算是有认识，也没能在行动上真正予以执行。 2、模范遵守行为道德的思想观念不够深刻.不够牢固.没有充分认识到人在社会各项活动中自觉遵守社会公德和道德准则重要。 3、平时生活作风行为自由懒散，有可能造成别人的效仿，在周围造成了不良的影响，导致整体纪律性下降。

二、整改措施： 1、 以本次错误为教训，树立牢固的社会公德和道德准则观念，不乱扔垃圾、不随地吐痰，为社会道德水平的整体提高贡献力量。 2、 认真克服生活懒散、行为自由的缺点，严格要求自己，以优秀的表现来弥补我的过错。 3、 加强思想品德的学习，提高自身思想素质，保证不再出现上述错误 。 上述检讨，不能表述我对我自己的谴责，更多的悔恨和责骂，深埋在我的心理。我错了，我请求领导能给我改正错误的机会。我也会吸取教训、引以为戒，以更加积极和严谨的态度投入社会注意精神文明的建设之中。 请领导监督、帮助我改正缺点，取得更大的进步和成功 。

检讨人： 2016月30日

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

尊敬的各位领导：

今天，我怀着万分愧疚与懊悔之心写下这份检查，来表达自己对于20xx年5月20日上午10点45分，上班时间听音乐这一行为的深刻反思，同时表达我认识错误、改正错误的决心。

经过一天一夜的深刻反省，我内心深刻的认识到了这件事情的严重性与错误性。

一是我的行为严重脱离了机关干部应有的行为准则，没有深刻的领会到习总书记“八项规定”的精神内涵;忽视了对自己的严格要求，对于领导三番五次强调的工作纪律与单位规章制度没有做到铭记于心、践行与外。

二是作为一名处于见习期内的年轻干部，我的行为不仅是对自己的不负责任，更是对整个管委会的不负责任;这一事件，不仅影响了自己的人生轨迹，而且，给管委会形象带来了极为负面的影响。

三是作为一名综合办公室的工作人员，我本来应该时时、处处、事事严格要求自己，为各科室的同志们做好表率，但是，这一事件的发生，给同志们开了一种不好的先例，不利于管委会的作风建设。

于此同时，我也认识到了这件事情的发生虽然充满了一定的偶然性，但也是长期以来我对自己的放松要求、工作作风涣散的必然结果。现在，我深刻的认识到，这是一个非常危险的倾向，如果放任自己，继续发展，那么，后果是及其严重的，甚至无法想象。我对我自己犯下的这个严重错误感到痛心疾首、无比悔恨与遗憾。同时，我的心中也有一丝丝的庆幸，我的错误被及时的发现并消灭，及时的挽回了我迈向犯错的脚步，阻止了我向错误更深处蔓延。在以后的工作中，我一定会以这次事件为教训，警钟长鸣，时时不忘提醒自己，严格遵守单位的各项规章制度，时时牢记作为一个机关干部应有要求，全面提升自己的思想道德素质与职业道德素养，勤勤恳恳，做好自己的本职工作。在此，我做出如下保证：

一是在以后的工作中，以这件事情作为一面镜子，时时引以为鉴，绝对不再犯同样的错误。

二是继续深入学习市、区两级政府及管委会内部的各项规章制度，深入领会习近平总书记提出的“八项规定”的精神核心与深刻内涵。提高自己的理论水平与知错、辨错能力。

三是不断加强自己的自律意识，强化集体荣誉感，强化自己的岗位意识、纪律意识与责任意识，不再做让组织蒙羞、让领导失望、让同志们痛心、让自己悔恨的事情。

四是要“知耻而后勇”，要亡羊补牢，化羞愤为动力。努力做好自己的本职工作，提升自己的业务能力，让自己尽快的成长为一名“政治觉悟高、思想素质高、业务能力强、为人处事诚”的机关干部。

请各位领导接受我的检查，并进行监督。

检讨人：xxx

20xx年xx月xx日

你们好，很遗憾地向你们递交这份考试没考好的检讨书。关于我此次的期中考试我未能取得预期的成绩，我感到深深地自责。我绝对有些对不起父母的关心和老师的教导，特此递交这份检讨书，表达我的歉意。

关于我此次期中考试的成绩不理想，我总结了如下几点原因：

第一，我的学习态度不好。在上半学期的学习当中，因为有时候上课不听讲，思想开小差常常错过老师讲到的知识点，也耽误了学习。

第二，我在课后没有及时复习，在上半学期的学习当中要说我上课不听讲还可以在课后通过写练习题弥补过来，但因为总总原因我还是没有去补习回来，因此对于不懂的知识点没有深入分析和理解。

第三，是我的压力过大，其实这份压力不仅仅是父母施加的，父母对我的要求是对我的关心，是希望我有好的成绩，将来能够有出息。但我却辜负了父母，以至于考试时候心情紧张，握笔的手都会因为做不出试题而瑟瑟发抖。

关于我此次成绩不好的原因还有很多的，但归根结底我此次未能考好期中考试的事实已经摆在眼前了，我在反省检讨错误的同时，我已经将目光投入在了期末考试。

在此递上这份考试没考好的检讨书，恳求父母和老师的原谅。

在昨天的数学第二次月考中，我没有取得优异的成绩，只考了90分而已，我错的全不是我不该错的，我全部都会，例如：填空题的比忘了简化;求比值的得数算错了;应用题没认真审题……连这次考试中较难的题我都会了，可是，却因为骄傲而马虎，没有取得理想成绩。这对我来说是不应该的。尽管这次考试没有100，我承认我很骄傲，期中考试取得全班第一名就飘飘然了，其实我忍不住会骄傲，但这次确实骄傲的过了头了。我写这份检讨书，并不是希望您原谅我，我是要激励自己，不能过于骄傲自满，尽管老师前一天说考得不是月考，我没有复习前面的内容，但这也是原因的其中之一，最大的原因还是因为我骄傲自满。我相信您不是一个盲目批评的母亲，您也曾经说过，不是每一次考试都能反映出真实水平，考试只是一个测验，关键还是在平时多巩固、多积累。所以，我决定：不再骄傲!下次一定取得好成绩!我也会仔细审题，把这一教训牢记在心!下次，绝对努力!请妈妈相信我。

检讨人：

20xx年xx月xx日

我是临床系08级三班的学生，由于在今天的四级考试中利用飞信接收答案已构成作弊行为，被监考老师当场抓获，被抓后我无心考试想的很多，知道自己已经放的一个很大的错误，将会面对什么，但是我知道不管会接受到什么处分我都会接受。

我知道我今天的行为不光彩，就算过的又怎么样，想到被人都是自己的努力才拿到证书，而我却是通过不光彩的方法拿到一张空的证明书。我今天的行为不仅是我自己阴影，也给我们系丢脸的，想到我们班的同学他们平时多么努力的复习英语，而我考试却投机取巧 心存侥幸想蒙骗过关。最后沦为这种地步也是自找的。让自己成为的一个不诚实的人。 天网恢恢，疏而不漏。首先感谢黄主任对我们学生负责监考严明，让我认识的自己的错误，让我能早点改正。还要上系领导道歉，因为我的事情让我，在你们百忙之中来打扰你们。谢谢你们的教育我会好好改正不会让你们失望，在以后的日子里希望你们多多指导，我相信在你们的教育和指导下我会一步步成为一个优秀的大学生，一个合格的社会公民。

尊敬的XXX书记：

对不起!6月11日下午，您在百忙当中抽出时间到我单位进行调研，检查指导卫生工作，这对我们卫生系统来讲是非常的荣幸。但在您到我单位各办公室巡查时居然发现我局二层机构县疾控中心传染病防控科违反工作纪律的检讨书A医师在上班时间上网玩游戏。这件事情，固然是一件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是长时间以来我局对卫生系统工作纪律管理不够到位，部份干部对自己放松要求，工作作风涣散的必定结果。

因此，这次发生的事使我们不但感到耻辱，更加重要的是惭愧，愧对书记您对我们的关心和帮助。现在我县卫生系统中出现上班玩游戏的现象是工作作风涣散的重要苗头，也是我们在作风管理上出现松懈的体现，假如不是书记您及时发现，而任其泛滥成风，那末，后果是极其严重的，乃至都没法想象会发生怎样的工作失误。因此，通过这件事，在深感痛心的同时，我们也感到荣幸。所以，我们在向书记您作出深进检讨的同时，也向您表示发自内心的感谢!

我县卫生系统出现这样的事情，我局党委班子高度重视，当天紧急召开局党委会议, 对当前我县卫生系统工作作风中存在的题目进行分析和研究。我局以为，当前，我县卫生系统个别单位和工作职员出现庸、懒、散的现象，究其缘由，一是熟悉上不到位。对机关作风和效能建设的重要性和必要性没有同一到县委、县政府的要求上来。二是管理松懈。不能从严带队伍，不敢动真碰硬，对机关不良现象视而不见，推不开情面，做老好人，维持表面上的一团和气。三是公仆意识不强。没有真正建立全心全意为人民服务的意识，不讲组织纪律，任意放松自我，疲沓拖拉、情趣低俗、玩性较重。这些题目的存在，固然触及的只是少数单位和少数个人，但酿成的影响是不良的。

为此，我局对县疾控中心职工违反工作纪律的检讨书A上班玩游戏一事在全县卫生系统内进行通报批评。并痛定思痛，狠下决心，紧密结合深化医药卫生体制改革和三好一满意活动，对全县卫生系统工作纪律和工作作风进行整顿，果断遏制我县卫生系统工作纪律涣散之风，完全改变工作作风不良的局面，全面进步卫生系统机关作风和行政效能?

一、检查整顿的内容

(一)工作纪律情况

1.检查各单位一把手和班子成员和一般工作职员是否是存在迟到、早退，在职不在岗，在岗不履职，上班时间有无未履行请假手续擅自离岗现象等题目。

2.工作时间是否是存在下棋、打牌、上网聊天、炒股、看电影，玩电脑游戏、干私活等现象。

3.是否是有领导和工作职员违反规定在工作日中午饮酒现象。

4.各单位值班情况及其它影响卫生系统形象的情况。

(二)医德医风建设落实情况

1.落实医德医风责任制，加强行风建设目标管理情况。

2.加强正面教育和反面警示教育情况。

3.完善行风建设各项制度及执行情况。

4.院务公然情况。

5.出院患者回访情况。

(三)医疗机构公道收费及贸易贿赂专项治理情况

1.公道收费情况：重点检查住院患者医疗用度一日清单制的落实情况，是否是做到日清日送;药品价格、医疗服务收费项目及标准和高值耗材价格是否是按要求进行公示;是否是存在自立项目收费、分解项目收费、重复收费、超标准收费(套用高标准收费)、超过规定价格售药等乱收费行为。

2.贸易贿赂专项治理情况：重点检查组织领导机构，法制、警示教育，长效机制建设，加强对重点科室的监视、管理等情况。

(四)基层医疗卫生单位药品集中采购情况

1.制定采购目录情况。

2.有无从其它渠道购进情况。

3.有无按零差价销售情况。

二、检查整顿的方法

1.加强学习，自查自纠。各医疗卫生单位必须重新组织学习我局下发的《关于进一步加强卫生行风整顿工作的通知》(B卫字〔2012〕54号)文件精神，同一思想，深进熟悉加强纪律作风建设的重要性和紧急性。在深进学习的基础上，结合各自工作实际，对照文件确定的检查内容进行自查自纠，深进查找本身存在的不足和题目，深进剖析思想根源，展开批评与自我批评，逐一进行查摆，并构成剖析材料，于6月30日前将自查自纠情况报县卫生局办公室。

2.强化督查，狠抓落实。县卫生局派出三个行风建设检查小组，对全县卫生系统各单位逐渐进行检查。针对检查中暴露出的题目和薄弱环节，各单位要认真分析缘由，抓好整改，通过整改进步，不断建立和完善加强工作作风和纪律作风建设的长效机制，杜尽类似题目再次发生，从而进一步转变我局干部工作作风，严厉工作纪律，进步行政效能。

检讨人：xxx

20xx年xx月xx日

亲爱的老婆大人：

遵照您的旨意，我昨晚利用了一个小时四十三分零七秒进行了深刻的自我反省，在反省过程中喝了一杯白开水，上了一趟卫生间，没有玩游戏，以上事实准确无误，请审查。以下是我的检讨报告，不当之处可以协商。

通过这次深刻的自我反省，使我清醒地认识到，14个月的婚姻生活，充分证明了老婆同志温柔贤良、勤奋聪颖，是个不可多得的好妻子，而身为丈夫的我却举止乖张、态度轻狂、自私自利，是一个不太称职的丈夫，所作所为确有值得商榷之处。以下是我对自己恶劣行径的剖析，请领导批阅：

1、昨天的事情是我不对。你千里迢迢、不辞辛苦冒着寒风来看我，我却不近人情要把你送回家。我这是看不起你的吃苦耐劳精神，不给你表现的机会。

2、吃菜的事情是我不对。你做的客家菜虽然不太像客家菜也不太像湘菜，但至少是菜啊!还是香醇可口、瑕不掩瑜的，我不该指责你浪费人民的劳动成果。我这么求全责备，完全是暗藏嫉妒之心，不过再加点辣椒是可以的。

万能给老婆的检讨书模板万能给老婆的检讨书模板3、你说喜欢陆毅的时候，我不该信口雌黄说我喜欢梁咏琪，害得你两天不能理我，极其痛苦。仔细一想，我的回答确实很不妥当，因为你的花心还局限于内地，我却冲到了港台，以后我还是喜欢周迅好了。

4、你喜欢看韩剧里的小政哥，我不该百般阻挠，你拿我和他比较我更不该表示抗议，因为人家小政哥都没有抗议，我凭什么抗议啊?(上课玩手机检讨书)

5、强强的婚礼，我说我可能有事走不开，可能没有时间去参加他们的婚礼。而你却准备了两个红包：一个800元的，一个1000元的，结果我没去参加，你不小心送出去了厚的。亲爱的，我不该笑你，你已经做得很好了，换作我，可能将两个都一块儿送出去了。

6、我不该信誓旦旦，冒充大厨，结果使你吃饭前欢呼雀跃，闻味时垂涎欲滴，吃的时候却垂头丧气，这对于你脆弱的心理而言，是难以承受的。

7、你剪短了头发，问我好不好看，我说好看，你很高兴;进一步求证，我说还行;你追问到底好不好看，我回答，不如以前好看，使你非常难过。这是我的错，以后此类的回复均以第一次为准。

8、探望你家人那次，你回来就和我讨论怎么教育孩子的问题，我的确不该推卸责任，惹你生气。不过亲爱的，这项任务过于遥远，我们还是讨论孩子由谁来生好了。

9、你指责我为什么不把家里收拾整理好时，我不应该反诬你把家里搞的乱七八糟，毕竟我是经过学校严格训练过的，收拾整理内务是我的专业。

10、你说我长得不如你漂亮的时候，我不应该顽固抵赖，你说得很对，证据确凿，可以让瞎子作证。

11、应酬回到家时，你围着我转了好几圈，问我喝了多少，我不应该说大话说喝了三瓶。亲爱的，我真不知道你的鼻子如此灵敏，其实我的酒量就只能喝一杯。

你一直是善解人意的女孩，希望你能够原谅我，给我改过自新的机会。

回顾一年的林林总总，本人得失兼有。下面我就这一年度自己的学习以及工作情况，谈谈自己的感受，剖析一下自身的进步和不足之处，让自己在今后的学习、工作和日常生活中不断铸炼自己，在各方面得到完善和进步。

一、思想方面

首先是思想方面。端正思想认识，认真学习领会十八大精神，在思想上同党中央保持高度一致。我对党有着无比浓厚的天生的好感，积极向党组织靠拢，并以极大的热情学习了党的基本理论知识，在思想上端正自己。在政治思想上，坚持四项基本原则，与党中央在政治上、思想上、行动上保持高度一致，拥护党的路线、方针、政策，坚定对共产主义的信仰，坚决抵制违背科学发展观的错误行为。实际工作中坚持理论联系实际，认真履行共产党员义务和用共产党员的标准规范自己言行，提高自身思想政治素质，更好的投身工作中。

二、工作方面

这一年来，我在日常工作中时刻牢记自己是一名共产党员，始终严格要求自己，遵守我公司的各项规章制度，力求时刻严格要求自己，踏实进取，认真谨慎，忠于职守、尽职尽责，能及时发现工作中出现的问题并提出自己的意见，努力发挥党员的先锋模范作用，以吃苦在前、享乐在后和对自己负责、对单位负责、对党负责的态度对待每一项工作，树立大局意识、服务意识、使命意识，努力把“全心全意为人民服务”的宗旨体现在每个细节中;以改进工作作风、讲求工作方法、注重工作效率、提高工作质量为目标，有条不紊地做好各项工作，努力起到表率作用，积极努力地完成了单位分配的各项工作任务。

三. 学习方面

这一年中我主动加强对政治理论知识的学习，积极配合支部组织、同时注重加强对外界时政的了解，通过学习，提高了自己的政治敏锐性和鉴别能力，坚定了立场，坚定了信念，在大是大非问题面前，能够始终保持清醒的头脑。不断改造自己的世界观、人生观和价值观，树立坚定的共产主义信念，使自己在思想上、行动上和党组织保持高度一致。一是学习方式上做到集中学习与自学相结合，二是学习内容上做到规定资料与网络资料相结合，三是学习方法上做到理论与实践相结合。作为新世纪的知识分子,我希望能够在有限的学习时间中掌握更多的知识, 以适应社会发展的需要,不断的提高自己的政治理论素质, 以适应社会经济发展的客观要求，更好地为人民服务。

四、 缺点与不足

在党组织的关心培养下，在同志们的热情帮助下及单位的领导和同事们的指导下，我认真学习、努力工作、政治思想觉悟都有了很大的提高，个人综合素质，有了全面的发展，得了一定的进步与提高。但我离一个优秀共产党员的标准和要求还有一定距离，自身也还存在一些不足。主要是理论学习的主动性还不够，工作缺乏主动性、创新性，有时侯和单位的同事沟通不够，会引起一些误解，专业知识的积累还不完善。对于自己的缺点与不足，我将在今后继续加以克服和改正。我相信在以后的工作学习中，我会在党组织的关怀下，在同志们的帮助下，通过自身的不断学习和进步，努力克服不足，更进一步改进工作作风，积极协助领导搞好工作，认真完成工作任务。今后，我会更加努力，认真学习，深入思考，勤奋工作，让自己的党性修养不断提高、认识不断 升华，为人民服务的本领不断增强，积极转变观念，开阔思路，努力向成为更高层次的专业人才方向发展。

尊敬的老师：

由于我今天下午的纪律散漫，加上不够自觉，旷了两节的数学课。惹了老师您生气，为此我进行了深刻地反思，终于意识到我犯了多么严重的错误。

虽然我只旷了两节数学课，但就是这两节数学课的旷课，我不仅违反了学校的纪律，伤了英语老师的心，并且还惹怒了李老师您，并使您生气，最严重的是，我破坏了班级的集体荣誉和纪律，给班级抹了黑，在任课老师和同学们当中造成了极坏的影响。

我已经是一个步入大学的青年了，应该是到了不用老师操心劳累的年龄，可如今由于我的偷懒和散漫，旷了今天下午的英语课，我感到十分地惭愧。英语老师辛辛苦苦地为我们上课，而我却因个人的懒惰而旷课，在宿舍偷懒，使老师生气，我意识到了我犯的严重错误，现在我郑重地向老师您和英语老师检讨，希望您能原谅我。我对自己的旷课行为感到十分地羞愧和抱歉，我承认我的错误。

老师，我在此向您保证，从今天开始，我一定认真上课，不再随便旷课，并不再违反学校和班级的纪律，严格遵守校纪校规，重新开始。老师，我如今深刻地认识到我犯的错误了，今天的事情我永远不会忘记也不敢忘记，老师，对不起，我以后一定严格遵守班级纪律，好好表现，争取改正错误，并改变老师同学对我的印象。如有再犯，请老师重罚，请老师给我一次改正的机会，我一定会改掉散漫的纪律。请您看我的表现!

检讨人

(一)妇女节(3月8日)，妇女放假半天;

(二)青年节(5月4日)，14周岁以上的青年放假半天;

(三)儿童节(6月1日)，不满14周岁的少年儿童放假1天;

(四)中国人民解放军建军纪念日(8月1日)，现役军人放假半天。

第四条 少数民族习惯的节日，由各少数民族聚居地区的地方人民政府，按照各该民族习惯，规定放假日期。

第五条 二七纪念日、五卅纪念日、七七抗战纪念日、九三抗战胜利纪念日、九一八纪念日、教师节、护士节、记者节、植树节等其他节日、纪念日，均不放假。

第六条 全体公民放假的假日，如果适逢星期六、星期日，应当在工作日补假。部分公民放假的假日，如果适逢星期六、星期日，则不补假。

第七条 本办法自公布之日起施行。

尊敬的系领导：

我是xx的xx，在此对3月29号星期日晚上迟到一事做深刻检讨。星期天回家由于路上等车时间过长且加之正值下班儿高峰期，交通拥堵，路上等车近一个小时造成没能按时返校，迟到了近30分钟，同时也是对我们xx集体的一种不光彩，使系领导对我，对我们班都留下了极为不好的印象。究其根本，谈其关键，还是对时间关念的一种莫视和放松，从而导致了我的迟到。

在此，我向系领导承认错误，接受系里对我的处分，并且也向系里保证，保证以后不会再出现类似的错误，保证以后每个星期天都在学校规定的时间里按时返校。

检讨人：xxx

学生上课迟到的事早已司空见惯，但你是否知道迟到后的检讨书该怎样写呢?下面是作文网为大家整理的学生迟到检讨书，希望能帮到大家。

篇一：

尊敬的老师：

关于迟到这个问题，在之前老师已经说过很多遍了，而且是很郑重其事的对我们全班说的，但是我还是犯了这个错误，我不是一个善于解释的人，其实迟到是没有理由的，迟到本身事件而言，这就是一个结果，结果发生了，中间有任何借口都没有用。所以，对于为什么迟到，我想说不说都已经既成事实，就不说了吧，不然就成了强词夺理。迟到在现在看来或许是一个小小的毛病，但是一旦形成了迟到的习惯，对我们将来的事业和人生发展都会造成极为严重的后果。现在的我们往往对小错误感到无所谓，往往不能够正视自己的错误，但正是这样麻痹的思想，导致了我这样行为的发生。

对于迟到，这不止止是对我本人有影响，而且这也对班级造成了不良的影响，我这次拖了班级的后退。老师，对不起，我是犯了原则性的错误，老师对于我们的迟到非常的失望，之前老师对我们已经是十分宽容了，但是我还是再次犯了错误，对于学生来说，上课不迟到这是最基本的事情，但是我这次却连这最基本的都没有做好。一个学校，学生都应该遵循上课时间是个不变的规定，而我一直没有引起忠实，没有重视学校这么平常的规定，这些都是不应该的，上课迟到更是对老师的不尊重。事后我冷静的想了想，我这次犯的错误，不仅给自己带来了麻烦，也给同学起了坏的影响，破坏了学校的管理制度，在同学中也造成了不良的影响，由于我一个人犯错误，有可能造成别的同学的效仿，影响班级纪律性，系里的纪律性，对学校的纪律也是一种破坏，而且给对自己抱有很大期望的老师，家长也是一种伤害，也是对别的同学的父母的一种不负责，每一个学校都希望自己的学生做到品学兼优，全面发展，树立良好形象，但是我这一次却犯了这样的错误。一个良好的学习坏境是靠代价共同维护建立起来的，我应该为自己的犯错付出代价，我真诚的接受批评，并真心的希望改正。

之前的自己，没有一点点的时间观念，早上不能哪怕早起一点点，如果每次都能早起那么一两分钟，不去赶在最后一分钟到教室，那就完全不存在迟到这回事了。另外经过自己的反思，我认为自己在之前的作息也是十分的不规律的，经过这次的检讨，我深刻发现了自己身上存在的很多问题，我会以这次的违纪事件作为一面镜子时时刻刻提醒检点自己，批评和教育自己，自觉接受监督，我要知羞而奋进，通过这次的事情，提高自己的时间观念，改变自己的作息习惯。

我知道写检讨的目的不是当作一次惩罚，而是能够让自己从中找到自己存在的一系列问题，然后发现问题，并去解决问题。

检讨人：xxx

篇二：

尊敬的老师：

今天，我怀着十二万分的愧疚以及十二万分的懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对旷课这种恶劣行为的深痛恶绝及打死也不再旷课的决心。

早在我刚踏进这个班级的时候，您就已经三令五申，一再强调，全班同学，不得迟到，不得旷课。其时，老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，我深为震撼，也已经深刻认识到此事的重要性，于是我一再告诉自己要把此事当成头等大事来抓，不能辜负老师对我们的一片苦心。

然而，正如高尔基说过的那样---当你把一件是看得十分重要的时候，磨难和失败就接踵而来了。比如有一次早晨出操，我在5：50点就飞快的洗漱完毕，穿戴整齐，看着时间还多，我甚至还在头上打了一点摩丝，可当我来到操场上，却发现一个人也没有，正当我着急的环顾四周看看有没有人的时候--我醒了，原来刚才的镜头全都是梦，一看表，妈呀都6：30了，而那天正赶上您体贴入微的来给我们点名，我却没能赶上去聆听您关怀的教诲，深感惋惜，深感惋惜呀!只怪我把起床这件事情看得太重，竟然夜有所思晨有所梦!唉，无奈呀无奈。又有一次，我正兴致高昂的洗澡，准备洗完澡了要去上课，谁知当我洗完澡来到宿舍房间门前，发现里面一个人也没有，我又忘带钥匙被反锁在门外不得入门穿衣，全身只着一条裤衩，连出门打电话求援的机会都没有啊!硬生生又旷了一堂老师给我们精心预备的无比生动的课，错过了一次老师呕心沥血给我们制做的知识大餐。郁闷呀郁闷!这枚小小的钥匙在我的求学路上狠狠的拌了我一跤!但归根结底，还是由于我的粗心大意，对舍友的出门时间了解不足所造成的。忆起当时，环顾现在，我当时就应该不顾有伤风化，跑出去给舍友打电话，拼死也要上课的!但，悔亦晚矣，悔亦晚矣!而其他那些诸如记错课表、钟表停走，闹铃坏掉的事情我就不想多说了，我知道这些理由说出来都是不能成立的，因为，这所有的问题都只能归结于我，还未能达到一个现代大学生该具有地认识问题的水平。未能对老师们的辛勤劳作做出回报，我越来越清晰地感觉到我是一个罪人!!!对于我旷课的事情，所造成的严重后果如下：

1、让老师担心我的安全。本应按时出现的我未能按时出现，试问怎么不会让平时十分关心爱护每一个学生的老师担心。而这样的担心很可能让老师整天工作分心，造成更为严重的后果。

2、在同学们中间造成了不良的影响。由于我一个人的旷课，有可能造成别的同学的效仿，影响班级纪律性，也是对别的同学的父母的不负责。

3、影响个人综合水平的提高，使自身在本能提高的条件下未能得到提高，违背父母的意愿，实乃不孝。

如今，大错既成，我深深懊悔不已。深刻检讨，认为深藏在本人思想中的致命错误有以下几点：

1、思想觉悟不高，对重要事项重视严重不足。就算是有认识，也没能在行动上真正实行起来。

2、思想觉悟不高的根本原因是因为本人对他人尊重不足。试想，如果我对老师有更深的尊重，我会提前半个小时起床，也不会在梦里对自己5：50就做好准备的事情沾沾自喜，就会更早的发现那只是一个梦，这样梦醒了也不会迟到，错误也不会发生了。

3、平时生活作风懒散。如果不是因为懒散、粗心大意、记忆力水平低，我怎么会把教学秘书如此辛苦制作出来的课表忘记?

4、平时和舍友交流不足，未能做到真正意义上的团结同学，试想，若我和舍友交流充足，怎会不知道他们何时离开宿舍?若我和他们真正做到好好团结，他们又怎会不知道我在洗澡?若更进一步我和他们相邀一块上学，旷课的事还有可能发生吗?

篇三：

尊敬的x老师：

我是您任班主任的xx中学x年级x班的学生xx。今天，我怀着十二万分的愧疚以及十二万分的懊悔给您写下这份检讨书，以向您表示我对迟到这种行为的歉疚和深恶痛绝，并且向您保证，从今以后我会严格要求自己，树立坚决杜绝迟到这种极为恶劣的行为的决心。

首先，我向您描述一下迟到那天的状况。前一天也就是周四晚上作业比较多，我因为一贯学习效率比较低，所以这次又毫无例外的赶作业赶到了深夜一点多。由于睡眠不足的原因，周五早上，闹钟响了两次我才听到，之后匆匆忙忙的起床，刷牙漱口洗脸收拾书包，急急忙忙得连早饭都没有赶得上吃，就被爸爸催促着上了电梯。因为前一晚没有睡好，我头很痛很晕，在从电梯转下楼梯到达地下车库的途中，一脚没有踩稳，直接滚下了十多级楼梯，从一楼滚到了负一楼…

之前的头痛再加上新的摔伤，使我全身都疼痛麻木，本来想赖着爸爸说要请假一天不去上课的，可是在爸爸认真细致的劝诱下，我还是勉强打起精神，鼓足勇气，在对伤势进行了一点简单的处理之后，踏上了去学校的道路。

到了学校，时间自然已经是很迟了。学校要求我们七点五十到校，可经过此前的一番折腾，虽然一路上风驰电掣，一连闯了好几个红灯，我到校的时间已经晚达八点十分。完了，迟到了，我心里这样想着，并怀着忐忑不安的心情低着头走进了教室。

x老师没有太多为难我，只是要求我按照数周以前颁布的班规，于周五之内写下一份一千五百字的检讨交给她。说到这份班规，自从颁布以来，我一直小心谨慎，生怕自己由于不小心行差踏错，违反了班规而受到惩罚。在颁布班规是您就已经三令五申，一再强调，全班同学，不得违反。其时，老师反复教导言犹在耳，严肃认真的表情犹在眼前，但谁知道我最终还是违反了班规，给班上带来了极为恶劣的影响。

周五整整一天，我都在构思着这篇检讨的内容，由于没有休息好而造成的头疼以及在认真听课和构思检讨两者之间的痛苦抉择，我既没能好好的听课，也没能按时写出这篇交给您的检讨。周五放学前，您很气愤的通知我，因为没有按时交检讨的原因，周一停课一天。听到这个消息，我有如遭遇到晴天霹雳一般，整个人都呆住了。

周末回到家里，我终于有时间静静思考，来认真写完这份检讨了。之前说了那么多貌似是为自己的迟到找出合理借口的话，并不是为了来开脱自己的错误。我深深地意识到，虽然这次迟到从表面上看是有着很多客观理由的，但从主观来分析，却还是应该归因于我自身的严重错误，具体有以下几点：

一、思想觉悟不高，平时就存在着有些懒散，往往在认识到事情的重要性的时候，不是马上采取行动，而是拖拖拉拉，得过且过。我周四晚上学习时，没有很好地抓紧时间，以至于造成了周五早上一系列事故的发生。在周五早上我意识到快要迟到时，还存在着一种侥幸心理，没有马上抓紧时间去学校，而是跟爸爸磨蹭了一会，希望他能同意我不去上学，这种行为耽误了很多时间，也反映出我遇事畏难，在思想上没有对按时到校学习这件事情绝对重视。

二、学习习惯不好，耽误了很多时间，作了很多无用功。平时回到家学习时，我总是不能专心一致，写作业三心二意，经常要赶作业赶到深更半夜，作完后便倒头大睡，书包也要等到第二天早上才收拾，早上又总是因为睡眠不足而没有听到闹钟响。有好几次都是因为这样而差点迟到。如果我不能从根本上重视这个问题，认真检讨自己的学习习惯，那就不可能从根本上杜绝以后的迟到现象以及上课听讲时的分心现象。这次我跟向老师您保证，我会采取各种有效措施改进自己的学习效率，按时作息，争取以后不再迟到。

三、在迟到并被要求写检讨之后，没有迅速认识到自己的错误所在，存在着一定的抵触情绪。说实话，我因为摔下楼梯而造成浑身伤痛，在听了爸爸的劝导后坚持到学校上学，却因为迟到而要遭到写检讨的惩罚。在当时，我的心情多少是有点不理解，并且觉得有点冤枉的。虽然想过要努力完成，可是在这样复杂心情的支配下，却什么也写不出来。后来回到家中冷静思考之后，我才认识到自己的错误所在。

在此，我对向老师以及全班同学致以深深的歉意，我的检讨浪费了你们的宝贵时间，我希望能得到你们的原谅，我之后不会再犯下诸如此类的错误了。

尊敬的各位领导：

20XX年5月13日夜班，我无故迟到，经过认真反思、深刻自剖之后，我为自己的行为感到深深的愧疚和不安，在此我谨向各位领导作出深刻检讨。 通过这件事，我感到这虽然是件偶然发生的事情，但同时也是这段时间工作态度消极、对自己放松要求、工作作风涣散的必然结果。这种行为不仅严重违反了企业的规章制度，同时也是一种无视集体主义、缺乏团队意识的行为，是愧对领导信任的行为。

在这件事中，我还感到 自己在工作责任心上仍旧非常欠缺，在思想上仍旧存在得过且过、混日子应付的极端思想。现在我深深地感觉到这是一个非常危险的倾向，也是一个极不好的苗头。通过这件事让我及时发现了自己的不足，这在我今后的人生成长道路上无疑是一次关键的转折。

发生这件事以后，我知道无论怎样都不足以弥补自己的过错，因此，无论领导怎样从严从重处分我，我都没有任何意见，同时我请求领导再给我一次机会，使我可以通过自己的行动来表达自己的觉醒，以加倍努力的工作来为我单位作出积极的贡献，请领导相信我。

在次，在今后的工作中，我对领导、对自己作出以下保证：

1 不迟到不早退，严格遵守车间管理规章及制度。

2 工作期间不违反劳动纪律，端正态度、提高岗位积极性。

3 积极配合领导工作，认真负责地完成本职工作。

此致

敬礼!

检讨人：

20XX年XX月XX日

一、技术方案

本项目选择美国洛格—布郎公司KBR工艺生产合成氨。该工艺结合了洛格公司和布郎公司工艺的优点，节约了设备和管道，降低了能耗，属国际领先技术。

二、工艺特点

本项目以天然气为原料，为提高资源利用率，将天然气中大量甲烷转化为生产合成氨的有效原料气体。天然气转化需采用两段转化，国内外大型合成氨装置都采用中、低压合成工艺，合成回路操作压力通常在8—22MPa之间。本方案选用常见的15MPa低压氨合成工艺。

本项目合成氨装置向国外公司购买工艺许可证，其它基础设计、设备设计及详细设计均由国内完成。除引进少量关键设备和材料外，大部分设备可国内采购。

其主要工艺路线为：天然气和一定量的蒸汽在一段炉发生转化反应，大部分甲烷与蒸汽反应生气H2、CO和CO2等，随后一段转化气到二段炉，二段炉加入空气，空气中的氧与原料反应提供热量，并产生合成氨生产所需要的N2 ，一段转化气中的甲烷在二段炉内进一步转化成氢及碳氧化物，二段炉出来的原料气经一系列净化处理后，合格的氢氮气经去氨合成工段生产合成氨产品。

尊敬的班主任老师：

以下是我对此次犯错行为的原因分析：

我此次的违反纪律的错误行为，首先是我思想纪律性太浅薄，行为之前没有清楚地认识到自己所作所为的不良后果。以为是一种无关紧要的行为，却不知我这样的擅自外出，给学校管理带来多大麻烦。

其次，我的安全观念不强，对自己纪律要求不严格，更加没有顾及学校以及带队老师的感受。虽然这样的买水行为并非什么危险的大事，但是擅自外出，脱离了带队老师的督管范围，一旦出事，将造成非常严重的影响。

其三，我目前思想还不怎么成熟，对自己的各方面约束能力都还欠缺，我太年轻不成熟，态度轻浮。

虽然客观上我年纪还小，但归根结底，此次错误是我主观方面的纪律性不足，促成了我这次错误。

回顾我如此的错误行为，面对造成如今不良的影响，我觉得自己是何等的不该，痛定思痛。以下是针对我此次错误行为做出的改正措施：

第一，今后我必须进一步深刻学校的各种规范纪律，认清明确自己的思想不足，做出深刻严肃的反省与检讨。在今后的学习生活当中，严肃加强自己的规范纪律观点，在学校今后组织的一切公共活动中，一定遵守相关纪律规范，绝不违反。

第二，今后我必须对自己的言行举止做严格要求，认真对待在校期间的学习生活。自己的言行举止一定要守规矩，以一颗遵纪守法的心来对待生活学习。

第三，针对我太年轻不成熟，我要从此次错误中深刻地吸取教训，通过深刻的反省，在纪律方面，一定严格要求自己的，从今往后再不擅自活动。

此致