麦田里的守望者英文读后感【精品20篇】

Today I have read Helen Keller’s “Three Days to See”.I have read this article in the chinese teaching material when I was in high school.This article impressed me.It told me how lucky we are.We should aprrecaite that we are healthy.Healthiness is riches.So today I read this article again.Whenever I read this article,compare with Helen Keller,I think we should treasure our life,god has given us sight so we can see a lot of good things,so we can know how beautiful this world is,so we can know how wonderful we can live in our coloreful life.

Helen Keller,blind and deaf from infancy.Stricken with a serious illness at the age of nineteen months,Keller survived from the illness but was left permanently unable to see and hear.In this article,three day of sight,we can see,how precious it was as for Helen Keller.What would you want to look at if you had only three days of sight?Helen gives her answer in this famous essay.I always think that people can realize the importance of the sight and sound only after they have personally expericenced the dark and silence life.Darkness would make him more appreciative of sight,silence would teach him the joys of sound.

This short story tell people how Keller take advantage of having the privileges to see,hear,and speak.Some people,unfortunately,are blind,deaf,and mute.These unfortunate people take more time to appreciate life and they are always waiting for the miracle all their life.The author,Helen Keller,is one of such person who is blind,deaf,and mute.She strongly believes that people,who are fortunate to have such senses,take life for granted.She also strongly believes these people should live in the fullest,meaning,accomplish lifes when they can do this today,do not leave it for tomorrow.

One can die at any moment,no matter how healthy or in what physical shape he is.As for this,Helen came across many instances.She had asked her friend what she had seen after taking a walk through the woods,and her friend replied,“Nothing in particular.” Her friend gave she this answer,because her friend become accustomed to see the routine of their surroundings,and her eyes only can be attracted by startling and spectacular things.I think if we only have sight for 3 days we will give another answer.

I appreciate Hellen Keller.Her life is a miracle,she stronly face the difficulties which can detroy one’s mind of living.Her life is a tragedy,but the world in her heart is full of love.Her spirit will encourage all of us,forever.

This is a story about a special and ueserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lomon person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following

Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to eich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation?

The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane

met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. In

dubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

导语：《高老头》这部作品在展示社会生活的广度和深度方面，在反映作家世界观的进步性和局限性方面，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

The sun setting, I pull the curtain aside and open the window, taking a deep breath, and feeling the vicissitudes of life.

Be faced with he money, great father is worth of nothing.

At that time, money is the capitalist new signs of the times, and father is just something that when the patriarchal clan system residual feelings.

Concerning father’s love corroded by money, whats left? Sighing…

Saddened by her solitude in the falling dusk, she is assailed by wind and rain. I never thought that, they decided to choose money instead of love. Extreme egoism flooded all moral principles. Father Goriots property was bled white and abandoned. Originally the spoiling under the money is so heartbreaking.

He was glowing with pain and memory, always hiding in the lonely grave.

Obedient just quietly indulgence, in exchange for you is just being betrayed.

Father Goriot still adhere to love them, as in the past, there is no reason, nor whether it is worthwhile, maybe, in his heart, so this is love.

The story happened in the past, but affects the future.

In our society, who are the only children in us, and it is groeing up in the doting parents’ love ? The same is the interpretation of love, at different times, what is the difference? As children, to accept the same care, what difference does it make? The same parents, giving this selfless care, and usually in the Father Goriot "refuse to realize ones error"?

It is often said, “This is the product of the society”。 Yes, the society originated from the people, for people in the final analysis, it is still the problem! Human nature on the one hand is missing, that led to all the problems of society the arch-criminal.

Their son is of far-reaching.

Ive seen in a magazine that a story:

Kim was born in a rich family. A few years ago parents opened the gold mine and accumulated vast wealth, becoming the richest man in the village. Rich family make little Kim be spoiled, and develop a wayward character that she love leisure and hate labour. She learned to smoke, drink alcohol, and spend a lot of money. In the countryside, her monthly expense is two thousand yuan, let the other kids out of,. When she was lack of money, she would ask parents for money, sometime little criterion thousands, but sometime over ten thousand. Once, she told a lie to his father for money to buy things, opening, f

​

凡·高，一个将画视为生命，甚至超过生命的人，一个真正用灵魂的色彩来绘画的人。可当他放下画笔时，却拿起枪结束了自己被人世束缚的生命。

他生命的热情，像是飞蛾扑火般冲动，像是美人鱼起舞般陶醉。他的色彩，跳跃着疯狂迷醉的舞蹈，奔放地随意旋转着，令人目眩;又似一首激昂的舞曲，想要跳出世俗的束缚。

他橘红色的发须是张扬也是落寞，那纠结的眉头总让人感到一种莫名的忧伤，他的《自画像》让人心疼。他总是充满幻想，却游走于极端，他总在绘画中与自己苦斗。他执著地爱着《向日葵》，他用抒情的笔调充分展示着那黄金般的绚丽色彩，一朵一朵绽放的花如同火焰，正如他自己所说，“这是爱的最强光”。

他的画，是永不熄灭的篝火，如同那激情似火的向日葵，按捺不住内心强烈的欲望，正奋力摆脱花瓶的束缚，奔向太阳。他的感情过于炽烈，总是因现实的黑暗而绝望;他的灵魂过于纯洁，总是因世人的污浊而叹息;他对梦想过于执著，魔鬼称他为上帝，上帝叫他为孩子，人们称他为疯子。

他说：“我是以向日葵的姿态活着，而不是以束缚的姿态活着。”看凡·高的画，第一眼看到的是耀眼的光华，第二眼看到的是太阳恋上雪花的矛盾，第三眼感受到的则是雪花在太阳狂吻下的无奈与消亡。

画如人生。当你被那金灿灿的麦田吸引时，你可曾注意到画面角落里阴冷，是否注意到那令人不寒而栗的送葬队伍?凡·高的绝笔画面，仿佛就是他自我生命的写照，是他宿命的遗言。灿如黄金的麦田之上，一群乌鸦飞过，也许，他觉得自己就像那个被束缚的稻草人，希望在阳光下沐浴却又无法忍受乌鸦的啃食。他选择了简单的方式让自己解脱，谁也不知道在中弹后的几天他是怎样度过的，是挣扎在生与死的边缘，还是静静地等待死亡。

凡·高，一个渴望自由的麦田守望者，一个天堂里的快乐狂人。

one of the most interesting questions about gullivers travels is whether the houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of swifts satire. in other words, in book iv, is swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? if we look closely at the way that the houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

first we have to see that swift does not even take gullver seriously. for instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. also, when he first sees the yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. he says, "i must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. this is why swift refers to erasmus darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the beagle-to show how gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. but if lemule gulliver is satirized, so are the houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. they walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. as gulliver says, "it was with the utmost astonishment that i witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a vienese waltz. to my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the lord edmund burke" . as this quote demonstrates, gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. for instance, the leader of the houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of charles dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the kings and queens of england up to george ii. swift subtly shows that this houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of queen elizabeths husband.

swifts satire of the houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. one of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that guenivre has brought with him to the island. first she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. but when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "as i watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than mr. pope being fitted by a clothier. she dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. my horse sniffed the creature and turned away." it might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. but it makes more sense if we see that swift is being satiric here: it is the female houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century england. the houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress gullivers horse. gulliver imagines the horse saying, sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held mr. pope on her back makes me queezy .

a final indication that the houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the houynhms visits lilliput, where he visits the french royal society. he goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at gallilee). the scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "the creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

he has accomplished the scientists goal, but the scientist is not happy, for his livelihood has now been destroyed. swifts clear implication is that even though the houyhnhmns are smart, they do not know how to use that knowledge for the benefit of society, only for their own prideful agrandizement.

throughout gullivers travels, the houyhnhms are shown to be an ideal gone wrong. though their intent might have been good, they dont know how to do what they want to do because they are filled with pride. they mislead gulliver and they even mislead themselves. the satire on them is particularly well explained by the new born houyhnhm who, having just been born, exclaims, "with this sort of entrance, what must i expect from the rest of my life!" .

To Regain the Nature of Goodness

—— Review of ‘Oliver Twist

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those vermin-to-be to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

The tale of two cities is a historical story， one of Dickens’ long fictions.The background to the novel is the revolution of France .It portrayed a brutal and bloody story ， but it also contained love and friendship.

In the novel， Dickens sarcastically described a typical cruel nobleman—marquis of Evermonde . When he was young he and his brother stole a countrywoman by force and killed her family .What’s worse ， he used his power to imprison Dr Manette ， a kind and honest man who knew all the things they had done and wanted to disclose their crimes . In order to hide their crimes. Marquis of Evermonde and his brother threw Doctor Manette into prison for 18 years . During these 18 years，Doctor Manette lost his freedom and suffer a great in spirit .

I felt unthinkable that Marquis of Evermonde and his brother killed people just as easily as they killed chickens. They deprived other people’s freedom as they liked and they thought it was normal and unremarkable. They had never realized that they had done something wrong or something improper. Because their nature was cruel and evil， like demons. There is an old saying which means： People who commit too many crimes will kill themselves. After all， there is justice in the world. The demons can’t be rampant forever. Because the world will not forgive them. They will pay their lives for their crimes. Let’s see the consequence of the Marquis，’’He lay there like a stone with a knife pushed into his heart.” I think it was just what he ought to gain and it is a real exciting scene.

The Marquis’ death was just the beginning of people’s resistance to the nobleman. Gradually more and more people joined in the revolution. One after another nobleman were sentenced to death and their heads were cut down . However， some innocent people were implicated in the revolution. Charles Darney was one of them He was the nephew of Marquis of Evermonde. To the opposite of his uncle， Darney was a kind and independent young man.

Dickens spoke highly of kindness mercy and love in the novel too. This is the other thone of the novel when Doctor Manette was released from prison. It was his daughter Lucie who took care of him and helped him return to normal. During this time， Dr manette and Lucie knew Charles Darney and Sydeny Carton， the two young man fell in love with Lucie at the same time . At last， Lucie married Chares Darney .Dr Manette accepted Darney as his son-in-law although he knew that Darney was the nephew of the man who threw him into prison for18 years. This is the love between father and daughter. And Sydeny Carton ， the very great man ，loved Lucie deeply. He promised Lucie that he would do everything for her happiness. He did it truely ，he sacrificed himself instead of Darney who looked the same as him. This is love for lovers . This is the most wonderful thing in the world. It also reminds us that no matter how no matter when there is true love existing. At the end ， Lucie， Dr Manette and Darney arrived in England safely.

The tale of two cities is different from other historical fictions. Its characters and main plots are fictional under the real background of the revolution of France. The author made the experience of the fictional charactor Dr Manette as the main clue.The plots are complicated， and they are flexuous and dramatic. The structure is complete and rigorous.

Dickens had dear love and hate. He praised those who ought to be praised and attacked those who ought to be attacked. The motivation of the novel maybe just warn the English dominators. But I think we can learn something meaningful from the tale of two cities.

假如霍尔顿没有他纯洁的理想,那他就会堕落到底,是他的理想让他活下来.理想是人的指路明灯,它带着人走向未来,走向光明.我们的人生才刚刚开始,纵然生活让我们这代人有些迷惘和彷徨,但一切不过是暂时的,不就都会过去,我们现在最需要的

他倒扣鸭舌帽，穿大号风衣，抽烟、醺酒，满嘴"他妈的、混帐"。因被开除而又不感回家而开始了他维时几日的流浪生活。他厌恶这个世界，他认为大人叫他读书就是为了以后能买辆"混帐凯迪拉克"，他讨厌这个金钱至上的社会，自己却挥霍无度，说自己"不是把钱花了就是扔了，是个十足的败家子。讨厌别人谈论酒和女人，自己却醺酒、恋美色，并且在流浪的几天里糊里糊涂地找来了妓女。自己想的和做的无法统一使他痛苦万分。

他所唯一敬爱的老师也竟是个同性恋。就在这重重矛盾中，他无法自拔，最终躺在了精神病院中。表面上霍尔顿是个玩世不恭的坏孩子，但实际上他却有颗纯净善良的心。他爱自己的妹妹，就在见她的那晚，霍尔顿说出了这段话："我只想当一个麦田里的守望者!"霍尔顿说，他想像着在一大片麦田里，几千几万个小孩子在游戏，周围除了他没有一个大人。他就站在麦田边上的悬崖旁守望着，看哪个孩子朝悬崖奔过来就捉住他，不让他掉下悬崖。"这是他的一个美好幻想，也是他美好心灵的见证，他希望那些快乐的孩子不要跌入悬崖，而是永远快乐的奔跑，而那麦田似乎象征着物质世界，他希望生活在充满物质主义精神世界的孩子不要迷失自我，走向悬崖。

相对于他那两个糊涂的室友，霍尔顿更清楚的认识到了自己所处的世界是什么样子的。而他厌恶这一切，因为厌恶，处于青春期的他就越发的那样做，似乎是一种反抗。很多时候，我们将自己的不满与叛逆小心地匿藏于心中，为了迎合社会，我们学会了伪装，欺骗。为了追名逐利，我们麻痹了自己的心，那些真实的想法渐渐被封存于心底，或许是一种自我保护，毕竟将自己完全袒露于这个陌生的世界中是不安全的。"一个不成熟男子的标志是他愿意为某种事业英勇地死去，一个成熟男子的标志是他愿意为某种事业卑贱地活着。

"一位老师如是教导主人公。这就是理智与成熟吗，我不敢苟同，可能是我还未涉世，单至少现在，我仍希望自己有一颗火热的心去面对世界。谁的愿望会是去当一个麦田守望者呢?或许因为霍尔顿身为富家子弟才使他表达出了自己最真实的愿望。然而现实总是现实，霍尔顿最终回到了现实世界中，表面上是因为妹妹的挽留，但事实上霍尔顿也无法离开自己所处之地，或许他自己也明白。流浪的结束也预示着青春期的他锐变的结束。"人只是在不断地出逃和回家中艰难地长大，真实的生活就是在这过程中出现了意义。"正在成长中的我们是否也体会到了呢?

我们生活在一个令人难以置信的发达年代，我们的生活中充斥着前人连做梦都想不到的高科技产品。可是不是，就是在这创意无限的快节奏中，人们反而忘了自己的梦呢……

我只愿做麦田里一个安静的守望者，守望住儿时的梦。

纵观古今中外成功人士，最成功的往往不是那些开口闭口物质主义顺便谈谈理想的人，而是那些时时追随梦想顺便挣钱过日子的人。

我想俞敏洪必定是敢梦的。虽然论及天赋、智商与资历，他都不是最出色的，但是他心中有梦。他从来都不怕被嘲笑痴人说梦，他只知人生有梦就去追。曾经疯狂的呓语插上了追梦的翅膀，俞敏洪也便到了一个普通人无法企及的高度。我想那时的他肯定就是个痴痴的守望者，在纷乱的人世间总算是守住了梦。没有失去梦想，于是与众不同！

说起梦想，似乎不得不谈及马丁·路德·金的《我有一个梦想》，而不久前辞世的南非前总统曼德拉正是对梦想最完美的诠释。生命那么短暂，而苦难却那么漫长。九十五年的生命，曼德拉竟在狭小的监狱中度过了二十七年，可是，他终于还是熬过来了。心中有梦想，爱的梦想有那么大的力量！在非人的磨难中，曼德拉没有忘记做梦，可以说没有他，就没有今天的南非。

在那样的环境下，曼德拉都没有放弃梦想，那么生活安逸的我们，又有什么资格轻易放弃呢？

高晓松有一段话震撼人心："那些声称被应试教育毁了的人，不应试也会自毁；那些指责婚姻磨灭理想的人，不结婚也成不了居里夫人；那些整天抱怨在现行体制下无法创作伟大作品的，去了瑞典照样找不到灵魂的自由。我们面对同样的时代，有些人看见世界，有些人伸手不见五指。"

我们是社会性动物，但总有那么一点不同，把我们从自然界的动物中区别开来。那么不妨用梦想点亮我们的灵魂吧。行走在城市之间，每个人都面带一样的笑容，迈着频率相同的步伐，为了同一目的的奔走。我们总是抱怨生活压力太大，生活节奏太快，压得自己失去自己，逼得自己忘了梦，也忘了自己还有做梦的能力。那么，何不像儿时的贝克汉姆，勇敢地说出"妈妈我将来也要当英格兰队长？"从此因为有梦而勇敢。守望着梦想的麦田，敢梦，敢坚持梦，也许，下一个"英格兰队队长"就是一直守望，梦想麦田的你呀……

Notre Dame DE Paris is the French Victor Hugo wrote. First of all, he is bell ringers Quasimodo ugly, hes ugly, let a person feel afraid: horseshoe mouth, in the right eye is covered with a large tumor, big buck teeth... . Quasimodo is deaf, kyphosis, and the lame, and cruel and unreasonable, who saw all hate him.

Gypsy girl esmeralda has fairy beauty, love as long as she appeared, would have caused a sensation. All the men in the book saw she will fall in love with her. She was very kind, in order to save the poor poet and his false get married, she gave her money to busk income homeless children.

This book mainly to write only listen Quasimodo raised by his vice bishop Notre Dame DE Paris, but vice bishop assassinated, esmeralda royal captain of love, also forced love, esmeralda to marry her, or she was hanged. When love the esmeralda condemnation of that day of, Quasimodo brave love, esmeralda to Notre Dame tower. But the king sent against the cathedral of Notre Dame, and the girl hanged. Quasimodo grieving, and finally find love, esmeralda bones, committed suicide in beside her.

巴黎圣母院是法国维克多.雨果写的。首先他讲的是敲钟人卡西莫多的丑陋，他的丑陋让人感到 害怕：马蹄形的嘴巴、右眼被一个大瘤遮盖，大龅牙……。卡西莫多也是个聋子、驼背和瘸子，而且凶暴、蛮横，谁见了都讨厌他。

吉普赛少女爱森梅拉达有仙女般的美貌，只要她一出现，就会引起轰动。这本书中所有男人一见到她就会爱上她。她非常善良，为了救穷诗人和他假结婚，她把自己卖艺所得的钱都分给流浪孩子。

这本书主要写卡西莫多只听抚养他长大的巴黎圣母院副主教的话，但副主教刺杀了爱森梅拉达爱的皇家卫队长，还逼爱森梅拉达嫁给她，否则将她绞死。当爱森梅拉达受刑的那天，卡西莫多勇敢的把爱森梅拉达举到圣母院的钟楼上。可国王派人攻打圣母院，并将姑娘绞死。卡西莫多悲痛欲绝，最后找到爱森梅拉达的尸骨，在她旁边自杀了。

The author pays homage to Hans Christian Andersen‘s compassionate tale with this faithful adaptation. Kids can relate to the duckling‘s dilemma; part of the growing-up proceis pulling away from those around you and developing a strong sense of self. Children have also witnessed or experienced the teasing that is part and parcel of childhood.

This agelestory speaks acrogenerations with its reaffirming message. In this age of instant gratification, Andersen‘s tale reminds readers that some things are worth waiting for and that a pleasure deferred (whether by choice or necessity) is often the sweetest one of all.

Pinkney‘s descriptive passages resonate with the splendor of nature‘s beauty. The glowing watercolors, filled with intricate details, make each blade of gravisible, and the delicately drawn, nearly transparent mosquitoes are as ethereal as they are in life. The subtle details incorporated into the scenes--a frog catching a passing fly at the pond and a tiny mouse perched by a crate in the old woman‘s cottage--make children take another look.

One day he heard a sound of whirring wings, and up in the air he saw a flock of birds flying high. They were as bright as the snow that had fallen during the night, and their long necks were stretched southward. Oh, if only he could go with them! But what sort of companion could he be to those beautiful beings?

‘I am too ugly even for a dog to eat,‘ the duckling thought. Jerry Pinkney‘s poignant text and rich artwork convey the timeleappeal of this tale of hardship and redemption. Anyone who has suffered the sting of ostracism can sympathize with the ugly duckling‘s plight and will relish the uplifting conclusion.

Scarlett , a very personality figures ，the two mans she love ,neither does she know about.To her, I was compelled to admire, admire her strong and brave, admire her to lay down in the environment, farm workers previously suffered education, admire her to disregard the community to create their own expression of the cause .She is in the whole story, all a person full of fighting will full of vitality . I appreciated most , it is this " Tomorrow is another day of hers. " . Promising forever, full of fighting will , will never give up, never desperate. I think Im moved by her.So, whenever I meet difficulty, the mood is not good, I will tell oneself : " Tomorrow is another day. " Gone with the Wind is absolutely a good book that is worth sampling repeatedly, the characters are graceful , the plot rises and falls, exciting boldly and unconstrainedly, though the subjective factor because of the author among them , the appraisal on U.S.A.s Civil War is not objective and overall, but as to angle of literature, this one fine piece of writing generation definitely absolutely, worth visiting.

Author: Antoine de St-Exupery

Main Characters: The little prince, the pilot, the rose, the fox, the snake, etc.

Despite I’ve not in my childhood yet, I still prefer reading fairy-tale stories. The tales, which accompany with me in my old days, often make me think of some precious experience and sensation which only belong to children. This summer I’ve review this kind of tale, which was published in 1940. It’s the world-famous fairy-tale by the French author, Antoine de St-Exupery, The Little Prince.

As many other fairy-tales, the outline of The Little Prince is not very complex. “I”, the narrator of the story, is a pilot whose plane has something wrong and lands in the Sahara. In this occasion, the pilot makes the acquaintance of the little prince, a little boy from another planet, the Asteroid B612. The little prince has escaped from his tiny planet, because he has some quarrel with a rose, which grows on his planet. In that case he left his own planet and took an exploration at some neighbor asteroids.

On his all-alone journey, the little prince meets different kinds of people, which includes a king, a conceited man, a tippler, a businessman, a lamplighter and a geographer. From these people he gets a conclusion that the grown-ups are very odd. Following the instruction of the geographer, he descends in the Sahara, on the earth.

老师，没有华丽的舞台，没有簇拥的鲜花，三尺讲台，一块黑板就是您挥洒人生的天地。面对几十双迷惘而渴求的眼睛，老师义无反顾地用自己如歌的声音，播洒爱的阳光，智慧的甘霖。伴着老师的声音旋律，学生学会了用灵魂去歌唱，用真诚去追求。

一块黑板，是您辛勤耕耘的土地，在这里，您播种下知识，播种下智慧，播种下理想，播种下祖国明天的希望！您讲的课是那样精彩，每讲一篇课文，都在告诉我们人生哲理，告诉我们人生的路还很长很长……

打开那记忆的闸门，许多好老师的形象，涌现在我的脑海。数学陈老师的形象尤其深刻，虽然我们才相处两个月。可我认为她是个最好的老师。每当我做数学练习题遇到困难时，她会不厌其烦地帮我讲解，如果我还没听懂，她就会举例告诉我，直到我懂了为止。如果是我马虎大意，她也会适当的批评我，我接受老师对我的批评，深深地理解他们的苦心，其实老师是在帮助我改正自身的缺点，我应该感谢她！

鱼离不开水，鸟离不开树，我们的成长自然离不开老师！

陈老师——您的心灵，如雪花般纯净，您的人格，像青松般高洁，您的青春似火种，将永远燃烧！我们永远尊敬您！

[麦田的守望者小学作文

在图书馆里，我无意中发现了一本很薄的书，名字叫《麦田里的守望者》，在我拿起这本书时，我没有想到这一本书会对我产生这么大的影响，使我感触很深，我觉得这本书的形式和内容都很出色。

美国的五十年代是一个相当混乱的时期，二战的阴云尚未散去，冷战硝烟又起。一方面科技发展迅速，而另一方面，人们缺乏理想，意志消沉，在自己无力改变的社 会大背景下，过着混混噩噩的生活。于是，"垮掉的一代"出现了，霍尔顿就是其中的一员，他抽烟酗酒，不求上进，但是，他还不至于沦落到吸毒，群居的地步， 因为在他心底，一直还存有美丽而遥远的理想——做一个"麦田里的守望者"。

我们生活的这个国度，这个时代正处于巨大的变革之中，一切都在日新月异的发展。从某种意义上说，这与50年代的美国确实有些相象。社会不断进步，人们的思 想观念也在发生变化，很多人开始迷茫，消沉，他们逐渐遗忘自己的理想，没有了最初的热情，开始向往平庸。酒吧、卡拉OK、棋牌室开始人流如潮，网吧、游戏 机房中学生不断，所谓新新人类疯狂地迷恋上了摇头丸、K粉等毒品……

我们是一群生活在新时代的新生力量，自然已经习惯了困惑和烦恼，但是我们应该集中精神看准我们的前方，我们的路，我们应该是一群有理想有抱负的人，从小我 们就对自己的未来充满憧憬，想当科学家、医生、护士、老师……假如霍尔顿没有他纯洁的理想，那他就会堕落到底，是他的理想让他活下来。难道我们年轻人就该 让生活变得如此混沌?是的，理想是人的指路明灯，它带着人走向未来，走向光明，我们的人生才刚刚开始，纵然生活让我们这代人有些迷惘和彷徨，但一切不过是 暂时的，不就都会过去，我们现在最需要的，就是我们的理想。

是的，有理想就有希望，希望就在明天，明天会更美好!把握好自己的生活，明天必定会是金碧辉煌!

那天去书店，我从一大堆世界名着中挑了一本很薄的书，名字叫《麦田里的守望者》，在我拿起这本书时，我没有想到这么薄的一本书会对我产生这么大的影响，使我感触很深，我觉得这本书的形式和内容都很出色。

美国的五十年代是一个相当混乱的时期，二战的阴云尚未散去，冷战硝烟又起。一方面科技发展迅速，而另一方面，人们缺乏理想，意志消沉，在自己无力改变的社会大背景下，过着混混噩噩的生活。于是，“垮掉的一代”出现了，霍尔顿就是其中的一员，他抽烟酗酒，不求上进，但是，他还不至于沦落到吸毒、群居的地步，因为在他心底，一直还存有美丽而遥远的理想---做一个“麦田里的守望者”。

我们生活的这个国度，这个时代正处于巨大的变革之中，一切都在日新月异的发展。从某种意义上说，这与50年代的美国确实有些相象。社会不断进步，人们的思想观念也在发生变化，很多人开始迷茫，消沉，他们逐渐遗忘自己的理想，没有了最初的热情，开始向往平庸。

我们是一群生活在新时代的孩子，自然已经习惯了困惑和烦恼，但是我们应该集中精神看准我们的前方，我们的路，我们应该是一群有理想有抱负的人。假如霍尔顿没有他纯洁的理想，那他就会堕落到底，是他的理想让他活下来。理想是人的指路明灯，它带着人走向未来，走向光明。我们的人生才刚刚开始，纵然生活让我们这代人有些迷惘和彷徨，但一切不过是暂时的，不就都会过去，我们现在最需要的，就是我们的理想。

是的，有理想就有希望，希望就在明天，明天会更美好

刚一掀开书本，就被作者塞林格生动的语言深深吸引，全书用主人公的口吻平铺直叙，使用了大量的口语，使其有着一种通俗易懂却又不失发人深省的感觉。

《麦田里的守望者》以回议的方式写的是一个出身于富裕中产阶级的十六岁少年——霍尔顿，在第四次被学校开除之后，深夜离开学校，来到美国的纽约城游荡了一天两夜，接触了各种各样的人物，看到了资本主义社会烦人种种丑恶，他想逃离这个现实的世界，但想到自己也许会得肺炎死去，决定冒险回家和妹妹菲芯诀别，他向她诉说了自己的理想和苦闷，他想当一名麦田里的守望者，后来霍尔顿决定假装成一个聋哑人去西部谋生，最后，在妹妹的劝说下，他只好放弃西部之行，回到家之后人霍尔顿就生了一场大病。

看完这本书后，最让我觉得难得的是主人公在污浊的环境中仍能保持一颗与世无争的心，他渴望朴实和真诚，他有着自己的思想和灵魂，他有勇气拒绝成人世界的虚伪和肮脏，也许正是因为他看不惯现实社会中的世态人情，他才有了这个相当一名麦田里的守望者的梦，他希望自己能够为孩子们做些什么，他希望自己没有的童年可以让他人拥有。但是青春期特有的心理：玩世不恭，冲动敏感却又使得他一无所成，他没有能力改变这一现状，只能抱着那些虚无缥缈，不切实际的幻想去自欺欺人，最终他还是向这个社会妥协了。

由于作品的感染力极强，引起了我的思考和共鸣。青春期这是一个由孩童到成人的过渡期，著名的德国儿童心理学家夏洛特?彪勒曾把青春期称之为“消极反抗期”。在这期间，少男少女们总有着叛逆的心理，追求新鲜，愤世气俗，不思上进。和赛尔顿不喜欢读书，不喜欢受人束缚，但是除了这些我们还能做什么呢?打架，抽烟，喝酒，一些禁止学生的行为?多么可笑啊，它们也许能满足你一时的好奇和新鲜感，但绝对不会对你的将来有任何一点的好处，只会让你变得庸庸碌碌，一事无成。

每个人都有着对理想的渴望，但是如果不靠奋斗和努力，能换来什么呢?只有空白，任何的梦只有经过汗水的浇灌才会发芽结果。现实是残酷的，生活在这个社会里，不是我们改变环境就是环境改变我们，那么你们选择的是前者还是后者呢?麦田里的守望者也许是那么的简单纯粹，但它也同样需要付出，主人公有着美好的理想境界，却是垮掉的一代，因为他并没有资本去实现。

《麦田里的守望者》它道出了青少年的心声，增加了青少年对生活的认识，给予了我们许许多多的思考。它就像是海市蜃楼，看起来是那么的真实靠近，实际上却是遥不可及……

每一个人都有一段无法忘却的岁月，太多的敏感、偏执、荒唐、颓废、甜蜜与欢乐，使日子变得寂寞又温暖。站在一望无际的碧绿色麦田中，我想起了一个曾经的坏孩子——霍尔顿。

我有段时间总是那么烦躁，会因父母一句话而暴跳如雷，会因朋友的一个动作而伤心欲绝。后来我渐渐明白，那段时光，叫做青春。霍尔顿就是在那个时候突然闯进我的世界。他剪一个干净的水兵发型，却满头褐色乱发，邪邪的样子，有些迷人。

霍尔顿读书的地方叫潘西，一个私立的贵族学校。在这之前他还上过艾尔敦·希尔斯学校。那儿有一个非常势力的校长名叫哈斯先生。到了星期天，哈斯先生见到开了汽车来接孩子的家长就跑来跑去和他们握手，要是学生的父母穿的粗俗又朴素，那老哈斯就只和他们握一下手，然后假惺惺一笑，接着就和别的父母去讲话。青春的日子里，快乐和痛苦很容易被放大，刺激着我们敏感的神经，我们总是会因为这点或那点而不满或愤怒。霍尔顿受不了这样的环境，于是选择了逃离，戴着自己的猎人帽拎着行李想要去往西部。

在临走前，他想要再见见自己的妹妹菲苾。于是托人送去一张便条，约在博物馆旁边。过了好一会儿，菲苾终于来了，她拖着霍尔顿在胡敦读书时用的旧箱子装满了行李决心与哥哥一同离开。霍尔顿没办法，只好放弃了去西部。青春就是这样，充满了叛逆霸道却一心想要离开，最后在种种的牵绊下放弃了目的。

文中有一段让人印象深刻的话：“一个不成熟男子的标志是他愿意为某种事业英勇地死去，一个成熟男子的标志是他愿意为诶某种事业卑贱地活着。”我们可能很难相信这句话出自一个老师之口，但的的确确是这样，那时候学校里的老师大部分都是势力的伪君子，他们认为为了苟延残喘地活着不惜一切的人是成熟的，为了某种精神或理想的人是可笑的。就连孩子们读书，也是为了日后能买辆凯迪拉克之类的东西。霍尔顿曾经同妹妹说，他想要当个麦田里的守望者，守护一群小孩子。相信也有很多人拥有过类似的理想，只是那个理想太过遥远，来不及努力就已经长大。长大意味着放弃，放弃掉有过的美好理想，成为所谓的“成熟男人”，为了某种事业卑贱地活着。这是种痛苦的生活方式，但绝大多数人会为了生活背叛心灵。

最后霍尔顿生了场大病进了医院，至于后来的事，无人知晓。于是留在书中的霍尔顿再也没有长大，我想他依然是那个天真的，单纯的“坏”孩子。

成长似乎是个永恒的话题，有时候，懵懂的我们选择把自己的不满和内心的小叛逆藏匿于心中;有时候，为了迎合社会，我们学会了伪装，学会了恭维，学会了欺骗，学会了送给别人一个个假笑;有时候，为了追逐名利，我们麻痹了自己的内心，封锁住心中真实的想法，用一份份赤裸裸的假模假式包裹自己，竭尽全力不让真实的内心显露于外。我们越是这样做，越是会发现——其实别人都在这么做。

坐在荒芜的田野中，捧着手心里的一本书，看着眼前已经收割过的麦秆，眼前浮现出一个“坏孩子”的身影——霍尔顿，那个名副其实的坏孩子。

小说《麦田里的守望者》是以第一人称叙述的一个故事，可以称它为“自传”。其中穿插了许多例如“他妈的”“ ”“混账”等词语，显得更加真实和生动形象，其中的道理也许更容易让读者接受。

小说主人公霍尔顿是个中学生，出生于富裕的中产阶级家庭。

他虽只有16岁，但比常人高一头，整日游游荡荡，不愿读书。他对学校里的一切——老师、同学、功课、球赛等等，全都腻烦透了，3次被学校开除。又一个学期结束了，他又因5门功课中4门不及格被校方开除，他丝毫不感到难受。在和同房间的同学打了一架后，他深夜离开学校，从他的故事中可以看出，这真是一个十足的坏少年。

他对妹妹说的一句话，让我印象十分深刻。“不管怎样，我老是在想象，有那么一群小孩子在一大块麦田里做游戏。几千几万个小孩子，附近没有一个人——没有一个大人，我是说——除了我。

我呢，就站在那混帐的悬崖边。我的职务是在那儿守望，要是有哪个孩子往悬崖边奔来，我就把他捉住——我是说孩子们都在狂奔，也不知道自己是在往哪儿跑，我得从什么地方出来，把他们捉住。

我整天就干这样的事。我只想当个麦田里的守望者。我知道这有点异想天开，可我真正喜欢干的就是这个。我知道这不象话。”

起初，我真的很不理解这段话，后来，我懂了。这是霍尔顿，在复杂的社会中，一种单纯的理想。他渴望纯洁的社会，就像那麦田，就像那小孩子们，包括那悬崖。可是，周围的一切都不如他所望，复杂的社会，一切为了利益，人们尔虞我诈，互相利用，为了自己的利益，不顾一切。

而霍尔顿，这个表面上看起来叛逆，看一切都不顺眼的青年，却正好看透了这一点，这个叛逆的少年，却有着一颗纯洁的心，他不愿意与世人同流合污，他在谈上学时这样说道——“上学的目的嘛，不就是出人头地，以便将来可以买辆混帐凯迪拉克”都说出了他发自心底对这个社会的不爽，而他之所以这么说，就是因为，他有一颗正直的心，他看这个复杂的社会不爽!

我也渴望当一个表面叛逆的青少年，而心里却一点也不粘上这个社会的浮尘，一点也不随波逐流，看谁不爽就说出来!利益怎么了?破坏关系怎么了?我活出了我自己，谁也无法改变的那个自己，我骄傲。想让我融入到这个尔虞我诈，假模假样的社会中，根本不可能!

霍尔顿，第一次接触这个人物的时候，我认为他是我的反面教材，读到后面，我发现我错了。我真正应该学习的，是他。

他那种正直勇敢的性格。

他那种出淤泥而不染的精神。

他那种敢说敢当，表里如一的品质。

凡高，一个将画视为生命，甚至超过生命的人，一个真正用灵魂的色彩来绘画的人。可当他放下画笔时，却拿起枪结束了自己被人世束缚的生命。

他生命的热情，像是飞蛾扑火般的冲动，像是美人鱼起舞般陶醉。他的色彩，跳跃着疯狂迷醉的舞蹈，奔放地随意旋转着，令人目眩；又似一首激昂的舞曲，想要跳出世俗的束缚。

他桔红色的发须是张扬还是落寞，那纠结的眉头总让人感到一种莫名的忧伤，他的《自画像》让人心疼。他总是充满幻想，却游走于极端，他总在绘画中与自己苦斗。他执着地爱着《向日葵》，他用抒情的笔调充分展示着那黄金般的绚丽色彩，一朵一朵绽放的花如同火焰，正如他自己所说，“这是爱的最强光。”

他的画面，是永不熄灭的篝火，如同那激情似火的向日葵，按捺不住内心强烈的欲望，正奋力摆脱花瓶的束缚，奔向太阳。他的感情过于炽烈，总是因现实的黑暗而绝望，他的灵魂过于纯洁，总是因世人的污浊而叹息，他对梦想过于执着，魔鬼称他为上帝，上帝叫他为孩子，人们称他为疯子。

他说：“我是以向日葵的姿态活着，而不是以束缚的姿态活着。”看凡高的画，第一眼看到的是耀眼的光华，第二眼看到的是太阳恋上雪花的矛盾，第三眼感受的则是雪花在太阳狂吻下的无奈与消亡。

画如人生。当你被那金灿灿的麦田吸引时，你可否注意到画面角落里的阴冷，是否注意到那令人不寒而栗的送葬队伍？凡高的绝笔画面，仿佛就是他自我生命的写照，是他宿命的遗言。灿如黄金的麦田之上，一群乌鸦飞过，也许，他觉得自己就像那个被束缚的稻草人，希望在阳光下沐浴却又无法忍受乌鸦的啃食。他选择了简单的方式让自己解脱，谁也不知道在中弹后的几天他是怎样度过的，是挣扎在生与死的边缘，还是在等待死亡。

凡高，一个渴望自由的麦田守望者，一个天堂里的快乐狂人。

[渴望自由的麦田守望者作文

那天去书店，我从世界名著中挑了一本很有意思的书，名字叫《麦田里的守望者》，在拿起这本书时，我万万没有想到那么薄的一本书会对我产生这么大的影响，会感触这么深。我觉得这本书非常好。

Go to a bookstore that day, I from the world famous picked up a very interesting book, the name of "the catcher in the Rye", in picking up the book, I never thought that a thin book will have such an impact on me, you will feel so deep. I think this book is very good.

美国的20世纪50年代相当混乱，人们缺乏理想，意志消沉，在自己无力的改变生活下 ，过着战争的生活。弥漫着战争的硝烟。

The United States in twentieth Century 50s rather chaotic, people lack the ideal, depressed, change yourself powerless in life, living a life of war. Filled with war.

我们是一群生活在新时代的孩子，我们有很多的困惑和烦恼，但我们应该集中精神看准前方，走好我们的路，我们应该是一群有理想，有抱负的人们。理想是人们的照明灯，他带着人们走向未来。

We are living in a new era of children, we have a lot of confusion and annoyance, but we should concentrate on certain ahead, go our way, we should be a group of ideals, aspiring people. Ideal is the peoples lights, he brought people into the future.

我们的人生才刚刚开始，纵然生活让我们这一代人有很多不解，不满意的地方，但一切都只是暂时的，要靠我们的力量去改变它，我现在最需要的就是我们的理想，只要有理想就有希望。

Our life has just begun, even if life let our people of this generation have many puzzled, unsatisfactory, but everything is just temporary, depend on our power to change it, I now need most is our ideal, as long as the ideal there is hope.

是的，有理想就会有希望，这是从《麦田里的守护者》告诉我的。

Yes, good will have hope, this is from the "catcher in the guardian" told me.

《麦琪的礼物》讲述了一对穷困的年轻夫妇忍痛割爱互赠圣诞礼物的故事，反映了美国下层人民生活的艰难，赞美了主人公善良的心地和纯真爱情。下面是语文迷网为大家提供的英语读后感范文，供大家参考。

Its a short story by O.Henry that has moved me for a long time.Maybe most of you are familar with its name,that is,The Gift of the Magi.I have read it many times but every time I like to read it slowly and deliberately.I think "The Gift of the Magi"

is meant to be savored.

Maybe there is no necessity for me to repeat the main idea of the story.But Im

so fascinated with the short story that I want to retell it yo you,and to myself.

It happened to a very poor but blissful young couple named Jim and Della in the end of 18th century in England.Because of the maladies of that society and the effect of economic crisis,they worked hard but earned little.Life is very hard for them.Despite of this,their love to each other and the enthusiasm for life didnt changed at all.When Chrismas day was approuching ,Della used the money she got from selling her beautiful hair which she treasured very much to give Jim a fob for his grandfathers pocket watch.But Jim had already sold that watch to buy Della tortoiseshell combs to wear in her long hair,not knowing shed cut it off.

It appears that the gifts they gave each other have been useless.But I think they gave each other the best of what they had to make the other happy.Isnt that true love?We can image,in such rough conditions,as it said in the story,"Life is made up of sobs,sniffles,and smiles,with sniffles predominating."Itst absolute reasonable for them to be beaten by the misery.But the fact is that no matter how tough life had been,they wouldt lose heart.With strong faith and their love ,they did their best to make the other pleased."Whennever Mr.James came home and reached his flat ,above he was called Jimand greatly hugged by Mrs.James."Maybe this account is the best description of their love and struggle against hard life.It was said that the povertier life is ,the firmer and truer love is."Actually,theyd given the very best they had out of love.

"They are too foolish children in a flat,who most unwisely sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house.But in a last word,to the wise of these days,let it be said that of all who give gifts these two were the wisest."Said the writer in the last paragraph.Yes,they are wisest.They are the magi.Are there any reasons for us not to show respect for the young couple?

I remind my grandparents.They have spent fifty years together.No romantic words,no stirring behaviours,just comman even pedestrian life.But I can say love exists in every detail of their life.They have gone through war period,three years natural disasters,cultural revolution and so on.But no matter what happens,they are always considering for the other.Even now both of them have become old step by step,they still cared about each other.My grandparents,in my opinion,is a pair of lovers forever.

Love has nothing to do with money,possession or status.Its consideration,tolerance and respect.Its giving ones best to the other even it means sacrifice.Its affection which connects two persons hearts,and its reinforced by adversities.

Struggle against adversities.Nothing did they have,at least they owened love.Never give up as long as love exists.From"The Gift of the Magi",from Jim and Della and from my grandparents,I have learned a lot about love,life and hope.