麦田里的守望者英文读后感(精选20篇)

《肖申克的救赎》是美国作家斯蒂芬·金的中篇小说，也是其代表作。收录于小说合集《四季奇谭》中，副标题为“春天的希望”。读完这本书后就来说说你的读后感吧。

Abstract: This film Shawshank Redemption describes a man called Andy Dufresne was sent to the prison for he murdered his wife but in fact he was innocent. Then he started fighting against with the wicked prison life. Though he suffered many unfair treatments and ordeals, he never gives up himself. Due to his intelligence and perseverance, he spend 20 years successfully escape from the prison as a redemption. He teaches me that never lose hope.

Keywords: hope; redemption; freedom; dream

The story took place in 1940. A man who is a banker called Andy Dufresne, was sent into the Shawshank prison, for he murderer his wife and her lover in bed. However, he was innocent as he said. The new days in the prison were hard to live. It’s violent, heartless and cruel. Nevertheless, A month later, Andy began to make friends with other prisoners. And one of them called Red, who could get anything what he wanted. Andy bought a mallet from him and started his plan to escape. During this time, he did many things: expanding the library, caving stones, helping the corrupt warden to get money or bribe, etc. Then a young prisoner’s coming break his quiet life in jail. But the warden killed the young prisoner the only man that knew Andy was innocent. Then he knew the prison he could not stay any more. It took him 20 years to tunnel secretly and he successfully escaped from the prison. When he got free, Andy sent the evident which could prove the warden corruption, briber and murdering to the policy agency. Before that, Andy had told his best friend Red that his dream---Zihuatanejo, a warm place without memory. After escaping, Andy lived a free life in another identity and made the prison governor arrested. Several years later, Red was approved to leave. for the promise to Andy. Finally, in Zihuyatanejo, they met.

The cruel prison life terrified me and the friendship moved me. The story goes to a happy ending---redemption. This film impressed me a lot. A sentence was said in the film: ’Some birds arent meant to be caged, but most birds will choose to stand it.’

In this film, as we can see, the Shawshank Prison, which enjails lots of people. They have been in the prison form many years ,so they won’t go abroad. Because they won’t and also they can’t. They lived here for years without hope, and they lived just in the small prison, where nobody knows what is their dream and what’s their hope. As I remember, a old man Brooks was released after he had been in the jail for 50 years. But he found that the world became completely different from the world he imagined. For example, he seldom see cars before. He felt very strange and helpless to the outside world He can hardly adapt to the new developed world. He would rather stay in the prison. So unfortunately he chose to commit suicide.

However, on the contrary, Andy said a converse sentence:’ Some birds arent meant to be caged, thats all. Their feathers are just too bright…’ He long for the freedom and strive for it! What I remember very clearly is someone said that “These walls are kind of funny things like that. First, you hate them, then you get used to them. Enough time passed, get so you depend on them. That is institutionalizing.” But Andy hadn’t been affected. He insisted on his faith of freedom. He dared to pursue his deserved freedom! That’s the first point I appreciate.

What’s more, another thing I think is friendship. Of course, Andy’s perseverance and endeavor is the main reason that he succeed in escaping. But it can’t be denying that friendship is also a important reason. Without the friends’ help in the prison, especially red’s, He can’t break the prison, too. Even in the jail which is the most evil place that Andy could make it a significance place. He had transformed a storage room smelling of turpentine into the best prison library in New England. Then the prisoners read the books and got knowledge from it. Andy also helped them to pass the high school equivalency. The glitters of him lighted others’ life. That helps him built many sincere friendships in the prison. He just too bright that didn’t belong to the prison .Then he escape and gained the freedom.

Furthermore, the patience, courage and strong willpower are the keys to escape. 20 years, not a short ordeal time, but he endured. He made his plan day by day, week by week and year by year. He never gives up. he took nearly twenty years to dip a tunnel with a little rock hammer which Red said it would take a man 600 years to tunnel under the wall with one of these to fight for his free .And he did it finally. Please imagine, crossing the tunnel he dup, he still should crawled through five hundred yards of shit-smelling foulness. That is the length of five football fields.

Then is the last but not least, I think. He has the bright brain ,the never fading persistent, and the most important thing----hope. Just as Andy said to Red: Hope is a good thing, may be the best of things. In this film, Andy show us that how good thing the hope is. Yes , hope is a good thing. Whatever it is, it can’t lock the hope. We all have dream. We all have hope. We all have it and please never give up, like Andy.

This film, Shawshank Redemption, teaches me a lot. It deserves to be one of the most overwhelming films in the Hollywood.

Love, what a familiar words, in everyones mind has a pure love, love is selfless love, it is a vast, only live in the ocean of love, just can enjoy love. And I read the education of "love the book, I truly understands love border.

This permeated with the love of the novel contains profound, send out the sort of full-bodied emotional strength is really very great. "Love education" introduces the Italian child amway in a school year ten months of ke is written diary, containing the classmate of love between, the sister and the love between children and parents, teachers and students of love between between love and love for his country, make the person is in love like reading the bosom of growth.

Love is like air, every day in our side, because its no shadow intangible is often ignored by us, but we cant live without it, actually the meaning of it have been integrated into life. But many people cannot feel. Love is great, because it not only to the individual character, but also to the whole nation is proud of dignity and emotions. Love is an endless travel, you walk while watching very relaxed, every day there will also be for something new comprehension, learning and full up. Then, just want to continue to go on, and even enthusiasm, dont care how long it will last. This time, such feelings already sublimate is a love, for a life of love. Read the love of education ", I walk into amway ko life, witnessed how they study, live, how to love. In touched, I find love contain the for the pursuit of living.

Through the ages, how much love true story ah, visible, love is everywhere. We are born, they immersed in the ocean of love, the love of parents and grandparents love. Gradually grew up and went to school, and teachers love, students of love. Love is like air general, love is all around us, we never left it, leaving the love person, is not a soul is a man. Love can make the person rescue, love can make the prodigal son back, love and can inspire people infinite strength.

Is love, that we can be happy grow up healthily, is love, and gives our inner warmth. Interpersonal love is great, love is forgiveness, love is inclusive. Love is the source of love and education, education is closely linked. Many feel a love, it is a more warmth; Give much a love, it is a more happy. In the future days, let us together bathed in the ocean of love.

"The gift of the magi" tells a story like this: in order to buy a platinum fob chain for her husband as a Christmas gift, his wife, sold a head of show hair. And her husband for the same purpose, sold the ancestral gold watch for his wife bought a set of combs. Although each others gift lost use value, but they get more important things than feelings, love, is priceless.

After reading it, I ask: arent rich couple, but it can in the ordinary day make such a remarkable thing: for the sake of each other, regardless of their completely. It is because they love each other, so would do such extraordinary things. By contrast, how much I pay for others? In life, I always for a little dispute, with others, haggle over every ounce, finally do more harm than good, bad credibility instead, why dont I learn from them, care about each other, and what is bad? I should really reflect on yourself.

"Lover one constant love", only care about each other and love each other, for the sake of others, the world wouldnt be so indifferent and cold.

《麦琪的礼物》讲述了一个这样的故事：为了给丈夫买一条白金表链作为圣诞礼物，妻子卖掉了一头秀发。而丈夫出于同样目的，卖掉了祖传的金表给妻子买了一套发梳。尽管彼此的礼物都失去了使用价值，但他们从中获得比情感更重要的东西——爱，却是无价的。

读完之后，我深有感触：一对并不富有的夫妇，却能在平凡的一天做出这样一件不平凡的事情：为对方着想，完全不顾自己。正是因为他们互相爱着对方，所以才会做出这样不平凡的事情。相比之下，我为别人付出的又有多少呢?在生活中，我总是为了一点小纠纷，与别人针锋相对，斤斤计较，最后得不偿失，反而坏了信誉，我何不学学他们，互相关心，又有什么不好呢?我应该认真反思自己。

“爱人者人恒爱之”，只有互相关心、互相关爱，为他人着想，世界才不会这么冷漠、无情了。

Ugly duckling illustrated, many tribulations into a white swan, it is because it has a dream of mind. It supports dream. In fact, no trajectory fate lies in the realm of beautiful, beautiful pursuit of ideals. The frustration and pain of life is inevitable, they should learn to walk the feet. Every child will have a dream of their own, as long as they learn to establish life goals, self-confidence, self-improvement, Independence grow up, they will really struggle through the original can also become aware of their "white swan" like the ugly duckling can achieve the same dream in the heart.

丑小鸭历经千辛万苦、重重磨难之后变成了白天鹅，那是因为它心中有着梦想，梦想支撑着它。命运其实没有轨迹，关键在于对美好境界、美好理想的追求。人生中的挫折和痛苦是不可避免的，要学会把它们踩在脚下，每个孩子都会有一份属于自己的梦想，只要他们学会树立生活目标，在自信、自强、自立中成长，通过拼搏他们会真正的认识到自己原来也可以变成“白天鹅”，也可以像丑小鸭一样实现心中的梦想。

Joy depicts the crisis of faith that overes Rabbi Banish of Komarov， who， having buried his four sons and two daughters. Only through the mercy of the God he has denied， manifest in a radiant vision of the dead Rebecca， his beloved youngest daughter， is the rabbi’s belief restored. The sense of wonder and the touch of heavenly joy that linger after the vision dissolves convince Rabbi Banish of the folly of judging God’s actions by human standards. The rabbi has interpreted the apparent tragedy of his children’s premature deaths as evidence of God’s alienation， forgetting that God is by definition inscrutable. That God’s purpose transcends man’s ability to prehend it is made clear to the expiring rabbi when the family dead approach his deathbed with arms outstretched to enfold him among them. For theirs is the kingdom of heaven to which a loving God has called them; and their deaths have evidenced not God’s wrath but his grace.

A version of Rabbi Banish’s deathbed revelation appears to Rabbi Nechemia in Something Is There. At twenty-seven he is already racked by the doubts that torment Rabbi Banish. So shaken is his belief in God that he deserts his rabbinical post in provincial Bechev for the flesh-posts of Warsaw. Although the prostitutes， unclean food， and shady business dealings which he witnesses there hold no attraction for the erstwhile rabbi， they intensify his revulsion from the world created by God and therefore his alienation from God himself. Unlike Rabbi Bainish， whose intimations of immortality and consequent rededication to God precede his radiant deathbed vision， Rabbi Nechemia cannot allay his doubts until the very moment of death， when a light he never knew was there flickered in hid brain.

While his dying words—something is there—resolve his crisis of faith， they e too late to affect the spiritual renewal attained by Rabbi Banish. No explicit promise of immortality， let along of salvation， attends Rabbi Nechemia’s vision. Perhaps grace is accorded Rabbi Banish because his doubt is triggered by devastating personal losses， and withheld from Rabbi Nechemia because his despair is the bitter fruit of idle speculation about the unknown. Whatever the reason， relatively few of Singer’s characters are granted at the moment of death the transcendent vision of unity between man and God that appears to Rabbi Banish in Joy. For the fortunate few， release from time into eternity is affected by a divine visitation which obliterates distinctions between past and present， living and dead.

These kinds of characters are lost in their world because of the seducement of the material world. They doubt their formal faith and gradually give up what they believed. But after they have experienced so much hardship， they realize that they cannot adapt to the life of the outer world so they regress to the former life with formal faith. They realize the importance of God and they begin to think seriously about the relationship between man and God. At last they find their right way of their life.

主人公霍尔顿是四门功课不及格而被学校开除的15岁少年。他倒扣鸭舌帽，穿大号风衣，抽烟、醺酒，满嘴粗话。因被开除而又不敢回家而开始了他维持几日的流浪生活。他厌恶这个世界，他认为大人叫他读书就是为了以后能买辆“混帐凯迪拉克”，他讨厌这个金钱至上的社会，自己却挥霍无度，说自己“不是把钱花了就是扔了，是个十足的败家子。讨厌别人谈论酒和女人，自己却醺酒、恋美色，并且在流浪的几天里糊里糊涂地找来了妓女。自己想的和做的无法统一使他痛苦万分。就在这重重矛盾中，他无法自拔，最终躺在了精神病医院中。

表面上霍尔顿是个玩世不恭的坏孩子，但实际上他却有颗纯净善良的心。他爱自己的妹妹和已故的弟弟，霍尔顿说，他想像着在一大片麦田里，几千几万个小孩子在游戏，周围除了他没有一个大人。他就站在麦田边上的悬崖旁守望着，看哪个孩子朝悬崖奔过来就捉住他，不让他掉下悬崖。这是他的一个美好理想，也是他美好心灵的见证，他希望那些快乐的孩子不要跌入悬崖，而是永远快乐的奔跑。而那麦田似乎象征着物质世界，他希望生活在充满物质主义精神世界的孩子不要迷失自我，走向悬崖。他美好的心灵与现实形成了强烈的对比。

要是说到这部作品的背景的话，美国的五十年代是一个相当混乱的时期。二战的阴云尚未散去,冷战硝烟又起.一方面科技发展迅速,而另一方面,人们缺乏理想,意志消沉,在自己无力改变的社会大背景下,过着混混噩噩的生活.于是,"垮掉的一代"出现了,霍尔顿就是其中的一员,他抽烟酗酒,不求上进,但是,他还不至于沦落到吸毒,群居的地步,因为在他心底,一直还存有美丽而遥远的理想---做一个"麦田里的守望者".

我们每个人心中应该都会有属于自己的一片麦田，而现实生活却常常给我们打击，击碎我们的梦想。但我们决不能自暴自弃，要相信自己，相信爱，去面对生活。很多时候，生活并不像我们看起来那么糟。

16岁的中学生霍尔顿·考尔菲德是塞林格长篇小说《麦田里的守望者》的主人公，是青春期的边缘少年，是当代美国文学中最早出现的玩世不恭的反英雄形象之一。

霍尔顿出身在纽约一个富裕的中产阶级家庭。老师和家长强迫他好好读书，为的是“出人头地，以便将来买辆混帐的凯迪拉克”。在这里，纯真年代与现实社会共同构成青春的陷阱。他看不惯周围的一切，青春的躁动使他离经叛道，根本没心思用功读书，因而老是挨罚。到他第四次被开除出校时，不敢贸然回家，便只身在美国最繁华的纽约城游荡了一天两夜，他内心苦闷、彷徨，他认为成人社会里无人可信，全是“假仁假义的伪君子”。他向往妹妹菲芘无忧无虑的生活，小说临近尾声时，他淋着雨，看妹妹玩旋转木马，浑身湿透，可他快乐极了。“她穿着那么件蓝色大衣，老那么转个不停，看上去真他妈的好看极了。老天爷，我真希望你当时也在场。”这样精彩的段落，把霍尔顿的孩子性情表露无遗，但同时深层次的悲哀也重重地击打在读者的心上——他选择逃避，拒绝成长。

霍尔顿告诉妹妹他最愿意做的事情：“不管怎样，我老是在想象，有那么一群小孩子在一大块麦田里做游戏。几千几万个小孩子。附近没有一个人——没有一个大人，我是说——除了我。我呢，就站在那混帐的悬崖边。我的职务是在那儿守望，要是有哪个孩子往悬崖边奔来，我就把他捉住——我是说孩子们都在狂奔，也不知道自己是在往哪儿跑，我得从什么地方出来，把他们捉住。我整天就干这样的事。我只想当个麦田里的守望者。我知道这有点异想天开，可我真正喜欢干的就是这个。”

守望纯洁的童年与心灵，做“麦田守望者”，这是一个青春期的孩子对生命最本真的热爱与深情。可是他却变成一个叛逆者，一个有问题的孩子，着不得不让我们深思。

“不管怎么样，我老是想像一大群小孩儿在一大块麦田里玩一种游戏，有几千人，旁边没人——我是说没有岁数大一点儿的——我是说只有我。我会站在一道破悬崖边上。我要做的就是抓住每个跑向悬崖的孩子——我是说要是他们跑起来不看方向，我就得从哪里过来抓住他们。我整天就干那种事，就当个麦田里的守望者得了。我知道这个想法很离谱，但这是我唯一真正想当的，我知道这个想法很离谱。”

——霍尔顿

虽然还没读完《麦田里的守望者》这本书，却已经被书中主人公——一个十六岁“坏小孩”所感动了，尤其看到他想当麦田里的守望者的想法，谁也无法不为之动容——那是孩子独有的纯净得让大人们惭愧甚至感到害怕的梦想。

霍尔顿是出身于富裕中产阶级的十六岁少年，在第四次被开除出学校之后，不敢贸然回家，只身在美国最繁华的纽约城游荡了一天两夜，住小客店，逛夜总会，滥交女友，酗酒……他看到了资本主义社会的种种丑恶，接触了各式各样的人物，其中大部分是“假模假式的”伪君子。最后打算收拾行李离家出走，去一个没人打扰的地方。最终因为妹妹的恳求与挽留留了下来。

刚开始看这本书时，真的不知道作者要透过霍尔顿表达些什么，可是做事情要有始有终，于是硬着头皮往下看，也因此渐渐被吸引了。

初始，只觉得霍尔顿是个爱抱怨，不求上进的少年——他几乎看不惯周围发生的一切，他讨厌周围肮脏的世界，他讨厌伪君子，讨厌和取笑周围一切虚假的人和事，讨厌无聊至极的电影，他讨厌肮脏的“阿克莱”，讨厌表里不一的斯特拉德莱塔等室友……他经常口是心非，说谎胡扯，在心里看不起别人，而且也爱装B……

可是继续看下去，你就会发现他其实是一个孩子，一个善良的孩子——他会怕他那贫穷的舍友有自卑情结，于是把自己的高档次的手提箱从架子上卸下来，放在床底(只是后来他的舍友把自己的便宜货放到架子上，目的是想让别人以为霍尔顿的手提箱是他的，这跟霍尔顿简直形成了鲜明的对比);他会由衷地喜欢心地好，笑得甜的人;他主动帮修女捡起篮子，并主动捐钱给两位修女，即使知道她们并非募捐……他很爱他的家人，尤其是他的妹妹菲比……

其实霍尔顿是明智的，是聪明的，他看透了社会的本质。

对于他的学校潘西的“自从一八八八年起，我们就把孩子栽培成优秀的、有脑子的年轻人。”他说：“完全是骗人的鬼话。在潘西也像别的学校一样，根本没栽培什么人才。而且在那里我也没见到任何优秀的、有脑子的人。也许有那么一两个。可他们很可能在进学校时候就是那样的人。”

对于厌恶的朋友，他同样会承认别人的好，这与“阿克莱”有很大的差别。

在大家都为厄尼弹的钢琴曲子(他认为被糟蹋了的曲子)鼓掌时，他则说：如果他是个钢琴的或者演员什么的，而那些笨蛋认为我很厉害，我是不会喜欢的。我根本不希望他们为我鼓掌。人们老是为不该鼓掌的鼓掌。他甚至为厄尼惋惜，因为他已经不知道自己有没有弹对。

在评论一场电影中演员演技时，不像其他人对演员演技大赞特赞，他在承认他们演得棒的同时也说到：一件事如果你做得太棒了，然后一来二去，不注意的话，你就会开始有点儿炫技，这样一来，你就没那么棒了。瞧!多么棒的说法!

对于恋爱，他讨厌那些玩弄女孩的混蛋，他说：我觉得如果你并非真的喜欢一个女孩儿，就不该跟她瞎胡闹。真的喜欢她，就应该喜欢她的脸，就不该对她的脸做出下流的事，比方说往她脸上喷水……

看到这些，你会觉得霍尔顿是一个思想多么奇特的孩子，让你不敢看小他。或许因为这本来就出自一个成年人之手，想法当然深刻啦!可是不可否认，当我们像霍尔顿一样的年纪时，思想的确能够这么深刻细致，且总不被大人们知道认可。

相比于他那两个糊涂的舍友，他更清楚地认识到他所处的世界是什么样子的。他厌恶一切虚伪的东西。

他是青春期的少年代表，从他的经历里可以清楚的看到与家长的代沟，家长总希望他像哥哥一样可以成为出人头地的人，可是他的理想也只是做一个麦田里的守望者，站在悬崖上，捉住不断奔跑的孩子。大人总认为霍尔顿是一个败家子，是一个不良少年。但他有自己的思想，在他那半成熟的心中还存留着点点梦想，即使它在那污浊的世道变得那样的细微渺小。

他的朴素和善良，是他所在的年代很少的，虽然他的有些思想还比较幼稚，虽然他有许许多多的缺点，但他反抗现实、向往美好世界的纯洁的一面是不可忽视的。

他厌恶虚假，可他也摆脱不了这样的生活：学校里全是伪君子，你要做的就是好好学习学有所成之后买辆他妈的凯迪拉克。然后他们让你觉得足球队输了你得表示伤心，你要做的就是整天聊女孩，酒还有性。每个人都在肮脏的小范围里天天混在一起。

霍尔顿不想再回家，也不想再念书了，决定去西部谋生，做一个又聋又哑的人。可最后依然没走成，表面上是因为妹妹的劝阻，可根本原因又怎会如此简单?事实上，霍尔顿也离开他所处之境。

霍尔顿一直都希望自己可以变得很勇敢，但是实际却是他一直都很胆小，被别人欺负后只能在做白日梦的时候幻想着可以把他打败，他连一个瘦弱的女人都制服不了，更何况别人呢?他被学校开除后，都不敢贸然回家，蹑手蹑脚地回去还一定要躲避着父母。他一直都在用一些不切实际的幻想安慰自己，却没有胆量去做真正意义上的叛逆。

在这一点上说，他是可悲的。

他厌倦世间的虚情假意，不愿同流合污，表面上又颓废堕落，谈一切被人为捏造过但又脆弱无比的东西，同不喜欢的女人搂搂抱抱，在影院听一大堆爱显摆的人对片子胡扯一通，在歌手唱的很烂人们却乐在其中的酒巴里与老女人调情，与连琴的名字都搞混的家伙打架，而打完后那人依然不明所以，不是他没有企图同他们深入探究，只是他们膜拜于那些被广泛认可的世俗价值，而只有他一个人被嘲笑了，处于被冷落的境地，最后他疯了，究竟谁活的更悲惨，是脑袋清醒却被看作精神病的疯子，还是不懂思考哗众取宠的正常人?

很多时候，我们将自己的不满和叛逆埋藏在心中，为了迎合社会，我们学会了伪装欺骗，未来追名逐利，我们麻痹了自己的心，那些真是的想法渐渐被封藏于心底。我们试图改变命运，到头来却发现总被命运捉弄;我们试图探讨人生，到头来却发现人生如梦;我们试图张扬个性，到头来我们只能无奈的接受被同化的命运。

那么，我们还能做什么?

我们最终无奈地加入到社会大潮中，为了今天的晚餐，明天的衣服没命的奔波者，谁会探索到孩子们内心深处的想法?谁又能记起我们也曾有过“麦田里的守望者”的纯净梦想?

Its a moving story and a mixture of love,fear,guilty,atonement and so on.For a lont time,it makes the books we read lost their color.

The first time I read a book written by an Afghan atuhor named Khaled Hosseini ,it told a story between two boys.A rich boy Amir at the age of 12 and his servant Hasan were brotherly loved.Nevertheless,afer a kite game,something miserable happened.Amir feel grievous and guilty for his cowardice and he cannot confront Hansan,using something contempitable to let Hansan and his father leave his home.Not long,Afghanistan broke ou a war,Amir and his father had to fled to America.After his grown- up,he cannot forgave what he had done to Hansan before.And to atone for himself,he returned his hometown,which was destoryed badly by the war……

Maybe all of us more or less had done something as Amir did before,we are too young to understand others feelings when we broke their heart into pieces.We may feel guilty and miserable for waht we have done.But there is no use to cry over spilt milk.What we really should do is to face the reality and like Amir,to atone for ourselves.

《麦田里的守望者》这本书中的主人公是霍尔顿，他是一个四门功课都不及格而被学校开除的15岁少年。他倒扣鸭舌帽，穿大号风衣，抽烟、醺酒，满嘴"他妈的、混帐"。因被开除而又不感回家而开始了他维时几日的流浪生活。他厌恶这个世界，他认为大人叫他读书就是为了以后能买辆"混帐凯迪拉克"，他讨厌这个金钱至上的社会，自己却挥霍无度，说自己"不是把钱花了就是扔了，是个十足的败家子。讨厌别人谈论酒和女人，自己却醺酒、恋美色，并且在流浪的几天里糊里糊涂地找来了妓女。自己想的和做的无法统一使他痛苦万分。他所唯一敬爱的老师也竟是个异性恋。就在这重重矛盾中，他无法自拔，最终躺在了精神病院中。

《麦田里的守望者》通过第一人称以一个青少年的说话口吻，生动而细致地描绘了一个中产阶级子弟的苦闷，彷徨的精神世界，从主人公这一个侧面揭露了资本主义社会追求物质生活精神生活荒芜的社会风气，道出了资本主义的实质。

美国的五十年代是一个相当混乱的时期，二战的阴云尚未散去，冷战硝烟又起。一方面科技发展迅速，而另一方面，人们缺乏理想，意志消沉，在自己无力改变的社会大备景下，过着混混噩噩的生活。于是，"垮掉的一代"出现了，霍尔顿就是其中的一员。

主人公霍儿顿是我读过的文学作品中为数不多的反面形象之一。他的性格深受资本主义社会的耳濡目染，既有丑恶的一面，也有反抗现实，追求自己的理想的纯洁的一面。外表上霍尔顿是个玩世不恭的坏孩子，但实际上他却有颗污浊、善良的心。他爱自己的妹妹，见她的那晚，霍尔顿说出了："我只想当一个麦田里的守望者!"霍尔顿说，他想像着在一大片麦田里，几千几万个小孩子在游戏，周围除了他没有一个大人。他就站在麦田边上的悬崖旁守望着，看哪个孩子朝悬崖奔过来就捉住他，不让他掉下悬崖。"这是他的一个美好幻想，也是他美好心灵的见证，他希望那些快乐的孩子不要跌入悬崖，而是永远快乐的奔跑，而那麦田似乎象征着物质世界，他希望生活在充满物质主义精神世界的孩子不要迷失自我，走向悬崖。相对于他那两个糊涂的室友，霍尔顿更清楚的认识到了自己所处的世界是什么样子的。而他厌恶这一切，因为厌恶，处于青春期的他就越发的那样做，似乎是一种反抗。

很多时候，我们将自己的不满与叛逆小心地匿藏于心中，为了迎合社会，我们学会了伪装，欺骗。为了追名逐利，我们麻痹了自己的心，那些真实的想法渐渐被封存于心底，或许是一种自我保护，毕竟将自己完全袒露于这个陌生的世界中是不安全的。"一个不成熟男子的标志是他愿意为某种事业英勇地死去;一个成熟男子的标志是他愿意为某种事业卑贱地活着。"——这是《麦田里的守望者》中，主人公霍尔顿.考尔菲德的老师，那位有异性恋之嫌的安多里尼的经验之谈。这就是理智与成熟吗，我不敢苟同。但仔细想想，安多里尼的认识倒也无可非议，在这样一个理想主义早已远去的年代，我们多数情况下不得不带着面具生活，不得不让自己屈服于种种压力，为了生存，我们必须丢掉儿时的纯真和对生活的理想，在忍耐、克制甚至卑贱中生活，这听上去有些残忍，但是却又无奈。谁的愿望会是去当一个麦田守望者呢?或许因为霍尔顿身为富家子弟才使他表达出了自己最真实的愿望。然而现实总是现实，霍尔顿最终回到了现实世界中，外表上是因为妹妹的挽留，但事实上霍尔顿也无法离开自己所处之地，或许他自己也明白。流浪的结束也预示着青春期的他锐变的结束。"人只是在不断地出逃和回家中艰难地长大，真实的生活就是在这过程中出现了意义。"我们是否也体会到了呢?

我们生活的这个国度，这个时代正处于巨大的变革之中，一切都在日新月异的发展。从某种意义上说，这与50年代的美国的确有些相象。社会不断进步，人们的思想观念也在发生变化，很多人开始迷茫、消沉。他们逐渐遗忘自己的理想，没有了最初的热情，开始向往平庸。

我们是生活在新时代的人，自然已经习惯了困惑和烦恼。但是我们应该集中精神看准我们的前方的路，我们应该是一群有理想、有抱负的人。如果霍尔顿没有他纯洁的理想，那他就会堕落到底，是他的理想让他活下来。理想是人的指路明灯，它带着人走向未来，走向光明。纵然生活有时也会让我们这代人有些迷惘和彷徨，但一切不过是暂时的，不久都会过去，我们现在最需要的，就是坚持自己的理想，不断努力!

读了《麦田里的守望者》，的确让人感到了莫名的悲哀，进而象霍尔顿一样，竟对生活充满了绝望的痛苦，就象一些评论家所说的那样，这本小说"明显地过于引人伤感"，具有一种"内在的死的欲念"。当然，我们对生活的过程是充满着热爱的，生活中不仅仅只有痛苦和烦恼，还有许多值得去追求和奋斗的东西，甚至生活本身就是一件很伟大的事情。

说起来读这本书，读的过程中心情是挺沉重的，这是一本让人不太愉快的作品，有着阴郁、灰暗的格调，但是书中主人公纯洁善良、追求美好生活和崇高理想的童心还是给了人些许慰藉。

那天去书店，我从一大堆世界名着中挑了一本很薄的书，名字叫《麦田里的守望者》，在我拿起这本书时，我没有想到这么薄的一本书会对我产生这么大的影响，使我感触很深，我觉得这本书的形式和内容都很出色。

美国的五十年代是一个相当混乱的时期，二战的阴云尚未散去，冷战硝烟又起。一方面科技发展迅速，而另一方面，人们缺乏理想，意志消沉，在自己无力改变的社会大背景下，过着混混噩噩的生活。于是，“垮掉的一代”出现了，霍尔顿就是其中的一员，他抽烟酗酒，不求上进，但是，他还不至于沦落到吸毒、群居的地步，因为在他心底，一直还存有美丽而遥远的理想---做一个“麦田里的守望者”。

我们生活的这个国度，这个时代正处于巨大的变革之中，一切都在日新月异的发展。从某种意义上说，这与50年代的美国确实有些相象。社会不断进步，人们的思想观念也在发生变化，很多人开始迷茫，消沉，他们逐渐遗忘自己的理想，没有了最初的热情，开始向往平庸。

我们是一群生活在新时代的孩子，自然已经习惯了困惑和烦恼，但是我们应该集中精神看准我们的前方，我们的路，我们应该是一群有理想有抱负的人。假如霍尔顿没有他纯洁的理想，那他就会堕落到底，是他的理想让他活下来。理想是人的指路明灯，它带着人走向未来，走向光明。我们的人生才刚刚开始，纵然生活让我们这代人有些迷惘和彷徨，但一切不过是暂时的，不就都会过去，我们现在最需要的，就是我们的理想。

是的，有理想就有希望，希望就在明天，明天会更美好

看过《麦田里的守望者》 霍尔顿是个标准的滥学生，他五门功课就有四门不及格，他利用被学校第四次开除回家前这段时间在纽约城里游荡。令他烦腻的事物太多，所以他在书中从头骂到尾。他毫不隐讳地将他看到的东西陈述出来，并明确表态：“我最不喜欢老人穿着睡衣裤和睡袍。他们那瘦骨嶙峋的胸膛老是露在外面。”“我***真希望他别老这么一个劲儿管我叫‘孩子’!”“那副牙齿像长满苔藓似的。”“跟老马蒂跳舞，就好像抱着自由女神石像在舞池上拖来拖去。”……

他是个天真单纯的人。他一直为“公园湖里的水结冰后，野鸭都飞到哪里去了”这一问题困惑许久并请教过出租车司机，“这个织毯子的印第安人弯着腰，我们都看得见她的**，我们经过的时候，总要偷偷瞧一眼。”“我可以在哪儿找个工作做，咱们可以在溪边什么地方住着，过些日咱们还可以结婚……”“女人。老天爷，她们真能让你发疯，她们真的能!”

很难想象一个无所是事，玩世不恭，百无聊赖的人居然和自己的小妹妹关系处理得那样融洽。书中仅有一次提到的“麦田里守望者”也是对菲瑟讲的，而且她也是阻止霍尔顿继续游荡即结束全书情节的人。

我原本是想把塞林格的《麦田里的守望者》的读后感写下来的，为了《麦田里的守望者》，我竟然不怕回忆那羞于启齿的年少，那种邪恶的、叛逆的、无所谓的孩子，内心空洞的、无助的、脆弱地与生活抗争着的孩子。

也许在真正年少的时候，我还无法懂得这本书，因为那时我们都太年轻，不真正了解生命,只是在懵懂与茫然之间。现在,我走进了“麦田”里，因为我自己就是一个守望者。

很难想象，在我十五六岁的时候，也有一顶红色的，霍尔顿那样的帽子。不知出于什么心理，我用手里不多的零花钱买下了它，我会穿着大皮靴，戴上那顶红得刺眼的帽子，一张幼稚的面孔喜欢在所有人的面前招摇，努力美好，直到自己美好，渴望别人欣赏自己的美好。有人说，这种状态叫花朵心态。等待已是很苦，花朵还不只是等待，它还有时间的紧迫感消逝的压迫感。我戴着这顶帽子一方面掩饰自己的恐慌感，另一方面又从别人投来的或好或坏目光中心里坏笑着，我不知道什么叫空虚，我自己都不明白这样做是为什么。现在我知道了，塞林格懂，他是真正懂得成长意义的作家。

《麦田的守望者》是美国作家塞林格的名著，主人公名叫霍尔顿,他讲述了自己被学校开除后在纽约城游荡一天两夜的经历和心灵感受。这本书不但生动细致地描绘了一位对现实社会极其不满的中产阶级子弟的苦闷彷徨、孤独愤世的精神世界，青春期少年矛盾百出的心理特征，而且还批判了成人社会的虚伪和做作.霍尔顿的性格复杂而又矛盾,但他有着一颗纯洁善良、追求美好生活和崇高理想的童心。其中谢幕时的一番话写出了作者心中的理想教育：“有那么一群小孩子在一大块麦田里做游戏。几千几万个小孩子，附近没有一个人——没有一个大人，我是说——除了我。我呢?就站在那悬崖边。我的职务是在那儿守望，要是有哪个孩子往悬崖边奔来，我就把他捉住——我是说孩子们都在狂奔，也不知道自己是在往哪儿跑，我得从什么地方出来，把他们捉住。我整天就干这样的事。我只想当麦田里得守望者。”这番话我仔细揣摩了一下，得到一些启示。

第一、 教育需要“顺性而为”，在于引导而非强制。孩子之所以能够无拘无束地做游戏，首先在于主人公给他们提供了一个释放童心，张扬个性的精神家园——麦田，或者允许孩子们进入麦田，却有很多的规定。这样孩子们兴趣达不到极限，也不会有自由精神，更不会有创新精神，甚至会觉得恐慌。

第二、 教育的成功的智慧在于找到支点，支起学生的能力发展和生命成长。“给孩子一个支点，他能撬动整个地球!”，守望者并不是一名游戏的旁观者，而是敏感地发现了游戏中的关键点——悬崖，守候于此有四两拨千斤的功效。这不正是我们所谓的抓住契机吗?

第三、教育过程中：许多事情是没办法选择的，但你可以选择态度。做班主任不能选择学生，什么学生进来，你都得接受，作为生活辅导老师也是一样的，但只要我们尽心尽力，问心无愧，积极面对学生的实际状况，总有一天，学生会提高，会进步的。

第四、教育实践中“埋怨环境不好，常常是我们自己不好;埋怨别人狭隘，常常是我们自己不豁达;埋怨天气恶劣，常常是我们抵抗力太弱;埋怨学生难教，常常是我们自己方法太少。”确实，回顾自己在平凡的生活和工作中，遇到不顺时就有推卸责任，出现埋怨周围的环境和别人的想法或者说是不平衡心态的现象，却不懂或者不肯从自身出发找原因，不善于改变自己来适应周围的环境。多改变自己，少埋怨环境，在遇到问题时要变换角度思考问题，选择积极的角色进入生活，不能一味地要求学生来适应老师，作为一名教育者而是要去努力适应自己的学生。只有教师熟悉、适应学生，由此才能去改变学生，使师生成为一个和谐的整体，促进师生的共同进步和成长。有了这样的认识，我们才能面对现实，才能自信地工作，千方百计地改变自己的教育方法，提高自己的教育水平。

第五、平等的对待每一个孩子, 不放弃每一个孩子，不唯亲，不唯富，不唯优，不唯近。为每一个孩子创设平等参与的机制，促进他们健康、快乐、和谐、主动的发展。学生能处理的事，放手让学生去做，充分的信赖就创造了一个美好的境界。把自己的手伸给孩子很容易，难的是让他们学会用自己的手做事。成功也好，失败也好，不快乐也好，重要的是体验的过程以及愿意获得新体验的态度。

第六、在我们周围经常可以看到一些父母对孩子的错误放纵不管，他们认为孩子还小，长大就好了，这恰恰是最危险的，要让他们习惯于遵守约束，服从理智，免得以后难以纠正。我们可以一起制定详尽而切实可行的“室规”;自愿而明确的“责任到人”;简单而负有深意的“错误说明书”。因为一切都是大家自己制定的，谁都知道违反规定的后果，所以孩子们执行起来也不是特别困难。

第七、教师首先必须要有高尚的人格魅力，让学生“亲其师、信其道。”在尊敬、信任甚或崇拜的基础上接受老师的教育，学生受到的教育会更深刻，效果也更好!还有，教师也应该努力和学生建立起深厚的感情。“师生间的感情，是教育成功的第一块基石。”而离开了老师的爱心，感情的建立便是无源之水。

第八、做一个宽容的教育者，孩子犯了错误承认了就是好孩子，不能一味的认为孩子已经这样了，无可救药了，低年级的孩子自制了本来就差，我们要理解孩子的天性，没有不犯错误的孩子，多多进行换位思考，在宽容的基础上，让学生改正错误，“没有教不好的学生，只有不会教的老师”。

第九、做一个幸福的教育者，学生是含苞待放的花朵，师爱是阳光雨露，把教育事业当成自己的事业，把带给学生一生的幸福当成一生的追求。当孩子们健康、自信、活泼的成长时，不就成为了我们最开心幸福的时刻!

一群生活在新时代的孩子,自然已经习惯了困惑和烦恼,但是我们应该集中精神看准我们的前方,我们的路,我们应该是一群有理想有抱负的人。“守望”是一种习惯，一种智慧，更是一种境界，一种品质。为了学生的成长，教育需要更多“麦田守望者”。“教育上的错误比别的错误更不可轻犯。教育上的错误正和错配了药一样，第一次弄错了，决不能借第二次第三次去补救，它们的影响是终身洗不掉的。”这样的话不能不让人去审视自己：我犯的错误会给学生留下什么影响，还能补救多少?总之即使是最普通的孩子，只要教育得法，也会成为不平凡的人。

教育是一门科学，育人成才是一种精雕细刻的艺术，在工作中只有讲科学、讲创新、讲艺术，才能培养出适应社会需要的高素质的人才来。在今后的工作中，我将不断多学习先进经验，不断改进，不断提高，积极探索，善于总结，事事都换个角度看现象，使自己的工作水平不断提高。

lls us that the best people to increase the dignity of life is love. Novels by the end of the row that this is such a life. Although I think this kind of outcome is too perfect, so perfect a little superficial, but I still respect this author The ideal of a better kind of life. ------- Is to increase the dignity of love / In modern society, few people will like Jane Eyre, for the love for the character and abandon all, and without looking back.s Whole-hearted pursuit of pay, and pure like a glass of ice water ……

那天去书店，我从世界名著中挑了一本很有意思的书，名字叫《麦田里的守望者》，在拿起这本书时，我万万没有想到那么薄的一本书会对我产生这么大的影响，会感触这么深。我觉得这本书非常好。

Go to a bookstore that day, I from the world famous picked up a very interesting book, the name of "the catcher in the Rye", in picking up the book, I never thought that a thin book will have such an impact on me, you will feel so deep. I think this book is very good.

美国的20世纪50年代相当混乱，人们缺乏理想，意志消沉，在自己无力的改变生活下 ，过着战争的生活。弥漫着战争的硝烟。

The United States in twentieth Century 50s rather chaotic, people lack the ideal, depressed, change yourself powerless in life, living a life of war. Filled with war.

我们是一群生活在新时代的孩子，我们有很多的困惑和烦恼，但我们应该集中精神看准前方，走好我们的路，我们应该是一群有理想，有抱负的人们。理想是人们的照明灯，他带着人们走向未来。

We are living in a new era of children, we have a lot of confusion and annoyance, but we should concentrate on certain ahead, go our way, we should be a group of ideals, aspiring people. Ideal is the peoples lights, he brought people into the future.

我们的人生才刚刚开始，纵然生活让我们这一代人有很多不解，不满意的地方，但一切都只是暂时的，要靠我们的力量去改变它，我现在最需要的就是我们的理想，只要有理想就有希望。

Our life has just begun, even if life let our people of this generation have many puzzled, unsatisfactory, but everything is just temporary, depend on our power to change it, I now need most is our ideal, as long as the ideal there is hope.

是的，有理想就会有希望，这是从《麦田里的守护者》告诉我的。

Yes, good will have hope, this is from the "catcher in the guardian" told me.

There are many kinds of love, between family members, lovers, friends or love of mercy for the weak ， and jean valjeans love is to give all the poor people in the world, poor people, sympathy, and those who are worthy of respect. Is the book down, leaving me deeply shocked and moved.

爱有很多种，亲人间的，情人间的，朋友间的或是对弱者的怜悯之爱。而冉阿让的爱却是给世上所有可怜的人、贫穷的人、值得同情的人、值得尊敬的人的。正本书下来，留给我的是深深的震撼和感动。

Because of a minor crime, spent 14 years, in order to survive, he fled the shackles "sinners". Became a mayor has numerous property, a donated the most money to charities and the poor, so much so that he often go out a pocket full of money, the empty came back again. In addition, he also often give bread to starving people, give the clothes to cold; People everywhere. For the poor, he is like an umbrella, an embodiment of justice.

因为一个小小的罪行，被关了14年，为了生存，他逃了“罪人”这个桎梏。成为了一个拥有无数财产的市长，一个把绝大多数的钱都捐给了慈善机构和穷人们，以至于他往往出门时口袋里装满了钱，回来时又都空了。除此之外他还经常把面包送给挨饿的人，把衣服送给挨冻的人;到处访贫问苦。对于穷人而言，他就像一顶保护伞，一个正义的化身。

One of the most representative is he fang town with cosette, mother and daughter of love. In order to achieve the fang town dying to meet their own daughters wishes, he would escape again (this time escape from prison, for he is a lifelong convict price)。 Although fang town ultimately failed to achieve their wishes died, but he was always adhere to the time to complete his irrelevant to fang town - a dead promise… With the course of his life when carefully take care of her as his daughter. I was deeply moved. Corresponding with the dark and ugly social phenomenon, is a heart so kind, selfless; And the noble moral character. In order to make some strangers dont hurt, he should stand and walk again and again risks, even willing to pay a life of their own. You know this is how great courage and strength to pay! All this shows a noble soul!

其中最具代表性的就是他对芳町与珂赛特母女的关爱。为了实现芳町临死前能见一面自己亲生女儿的愿望，他不惜再一次越狱(而这一次越狱，对他来说则是终身苦役犯的代价)。虽然最后芳町还是没能实现自己的愿望就死去了，可他却始终坚持不渝地完成他对芳町——一个毫不相干的死人的诺言……并用毕生的精力把她当作自己女儿一样细心地照顾时。我被深深地震撼了。与当时黑暗、丑恶的社会现象相对应的，竟是一颗如此善良、无私的心;以及那么高尚的道德品质。为了使一些陌生人不受到伤害，他竟然一次次地挺而走险，甚至甘愿付出自己的生命。要知道这是要付出多么巨大的勇气和力量啊!这一切都向我们展示了一个灵魂的高尚!

No amount of money, high position, more power, jean valjean in the in the mind is far less than justice!

再多的金钱，再高贵的地位，再大的权力，在冉阿让心里都远不及正义!

After read the complete book, think that the class society is cruel to the poor is rude; Lamenting the social reality of France at that time; Think that people desire cunning evil thoughts; Lamenting over those mundane and ordinary people, in order to against social injustice, and made great contribution, the people full of hope and love.

读完整本书后，感叹过当时阶级社会对穷人的残暴粗鲁;感叹过当时法国触目惊心的社会现实;感叹过人们贪恋狡诈的邪念;更感叹过那些平凡而又普通的人民，为了反抗社会的不公而做出的巨大贡献，那些心中充满希望和爱的人。

"Only love can destroy everything in the world, unfortunately," this is the author wants to tell us, although we love jean valjean did not great, but in real life, ordinary love is everywhere. Do you remember when you are frustrated that the warm embrace; When you are thrilled that enthusiastic high-five; When you embarrass anger that understand the vision; When complacency that severe frown… Do you remember the warm language, friendly smile, soft eyes and then gently pat caresses…

“只有爱，才能消灭世界上的一切不幸” 这是作者想告诉我们的，虽然我们的爱没有冉阿让那样伟大，但在现实生活中，平凡的爱也是随处可见的。还记得当你沮丧不已时那温暖的怀抱;当你激动万分时那热情的击掌;当你愤怒难堪时那理解的目光;当你骄傲自满时那严厉的皱眉…… 还记得那温暖的语言，友善的微笑，温柔的目光和那轻柔的拍抚……

The most powerful counterattack is the love of dark! Let love pass, diffusion, with action to change around, the world will likely to slowly become what you want!

对黑暗的最有力反击是爱!让爱传递，扩散，用行动去改变身边的，世界才会有可能慢慢变成你所希望的!

每一个人都有一段无法忘却的岁月，太多的敏感、偏执、荒唐、颓废、甜蜜与欢乐，使日子变得寂寞又温暖。站在一望无际的碧绿色麦田中，我想起了一个曾经的坏孩子――霍尔顿。

我有段时间总是那么烦躁，会因父母一句话而暴跳如雷，会因朋友的一个动作而伤心欲绝。后来我渐渐明白，那段时光，叫做青春。霍尔顿就是在那个时候突然闯进我的世界。他剪一个干净的水兵发型，却满头褐色乱发，邪邪的样子，有些迷人。

霍尔顿读书的地方叫潘西，一个私立的贵族学校。在这之前他还上过艾尔敦?希尔斯学校。那儿有一个非常势力的校长名叫哈斯先生。到了星期天，哈斯先生见到开了汽车来接孩子的家长就跑来跑去和他们握手，要是学生的父母穿的粗俗又朴素，那老哈斯就只和他们握一下手，然后假惺惺一笑，接着就和别的父母去讲话。青春的日子里，快乐和痛苦很容易被放大，刺激着我们敏感的神经，我们总是会因为这点或那点而不满或愤怒。霍尔顿受不了这样的环境，于是选择了逃离，戴着自己的猎人帽拎着行李想要去往西部。

在临走前，他想要再见见自己的妹妹菲?。于是托人送去一张便条，约在博物馆旁边。过了好一会儿，菲?终于来了，她拖着霍尔顿在胡敦读书时用的旧箱子装满了行李决心与哥哥一同离开。霍尔顿没办法，只好放弃了去西部。青春就是这样，充满了叛逆霸道却一心想要离开，最后在种种的牵绊下放弃了目的。

文中有一段让人印象深刻的话：“一个不成熟男子的标志是他愿意为某种事业英勇地死去，一个成熟男子的标志是他愿意为诶某种事业卑贱地活着。”我们可能很难相信这句话出自一个老师之口，但的的确确是这样，那时候学校里的老师大部分都是势力的伪君子，他们认为为了苟延残喘地活着不惜一切的人是成熟的，为了某种精神或理想的人是可笑的。就连孩子们读书，也是为了日后能买辆凯迪拉克之类的东西。霍尔顿曾经同妹妹说，他想要当个麦田里的守望者，守护一群小孩子。相信也有很多人拥有过类似的理想，只是那个理想太过遥远，来不及努力就已经长大。长大意味着放弃，放弃掉有过的美好理想，成为所谓的“成熟男人”，为了某种事业卑贱地活着。这是种痛苦的生活方式，但绝大多数人会为了生活背叛心灵。

最后霍尔顿生了场大病进了医院，至于后来的事，无人知晓。于是留在书中的霍尔顿再也没有长大，我想他依然是那个天真的，单纯的“坏”孩子。

成长似乎是个永恒的话题，有时候，懵懂的我们选择把自己的不满和内心的小叛逆藏匿于心中;有时候，为了迎合社会，我们学会了伪装，学会了恭维，学会了欺骗，学会了送给别人一个个假笑;有时候，为了追逐名利，我们麻痹了自己的内心，封锁住心中真实的想法，用一份份赤裸裸的假模假式包裹自己，竭尽全力不让真实的内心显露于外。我们越是这样做，越是会发现――其实别人都在这么做。

自由麦田的守望者

——献给凡高

凡高,一个将画视为生命,甚至超过生命的人,一个真正用灵魂的色彩来绘画的人。可当他放下画笔时,却拿起枪结束了自己被人世束缚的生命。

他生命的热情,像是飞蛾扑火般的冲动,像是美人鱼起舞般陶醉。他的色彩,跳跃着疯狂迷醉的舞蹈,奔放地随意旋转着,令人目眩;又似一首激昂的舞曲,想要跳出世俗的束缚。

他桔红色的发须是张扬还是落寞,那纠结的眉头总让人感到一种莫名的忧伤,他的《自画像》让人心疼。他总是充满幻想,却游走于极端,他总在绘画中与自己苦斗。他执着地爱着《向日葵》,他用抒情的笔调充分展示着那黄金般的绚丽色彩,一朵一朵绽放的花如同火焰,正如他自己所说,“这是爱的最强光。”

他的画面,是永不熄灭的篝火,如同那激情似火的向日葵,按捺不住内心强烈的欲望,正奋力摆脱花瓶的束缚,奔向太阳。他的感情过于炽烈,总是因现实的黑暗而绝望,他的灵魂过于纯洁,总是因世人的污浊而叹息,他对梦想过于执着,魔鬼称他为上帝,上帝叫他为孩子,人们称他为疯子。

他说:“我是以向日葵的姿态活着,而不是以束缚的姿态活着。”看凡高的画,第一眼看到的是耀眼的光华,第二眼看到的是太阳恋上雪花的矛盾,第三眼感受的则是雪花在太阳狂吻下的无奈与消亡。

画如人生。当你被那金灿灿的麦田吸引时,你可否注意到画面角落里的阴冷,是否注意到那令人不寒而栗的送葬队伍?凡高的绝笔画面,仿佛就是他自我生命的写照,是他宿命的遗言。灿如黄金的麦田之上,一群乌鸦飞过,也许,他觉得自己就像那个被束缚的稻草人,希望在阳光下沐浴却又无法忍受乌鸦的啃食。他选择了简单的方式让自己解脱,谁也不知道在中弹后的几天他是怎样度过的,是挣扎在生与死的边缘,还是在等待死亡。

凡高,一个渴望自由的麦田守望者,一个天堂里的快乐狂人。

Jane. Love living in a parents, sponsor, grew up under the environment of treatment with peers, aunt abandon, cousin contempt, cousin insults and beating of a child… this is the dignity of the ruthletrample, but perhaps because it all, Jane. Love and faith of infinite indomitable spirit, a kind of inner personality can win.

In rochester, she never because he is a teacher and the family status meanness, but that they feel inferior is equal. Should not because she is a servant, but not respected by others. Also because of her integrity, noble and pure heart, no pollution, secular society for the shock, and rochester her as a spiritual and equality in the conversation, and slowly and deeply in love with her.

Jane eyre itself to us is a kind of simplified, is a fanpiaoguizhen, is a kind of pursuit of whole heart feeling, is a kind of simplified feelings and neglected, it is like a cup of water, purify every readers heart, also cause readers, especially female readers

导语：《高老头》这部作品在展示社会生活的广度和深度方面，在反映作家世界观的进步性和局限性方面，下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

The sun setting, I pull the curtain aside and open the window, taking a deep breath, and feeling the vicissitudes of life.

Be faced with he money, great father is worth of nothing.

At that time, money is the capitalist new signs of the times, and father is just something that when the patriarchal clan system residual feelings.

Concerning father’s love corroded by money, whats left? Sighing…

Saddened by her solitude in the falling dusk, she is assailed by wind and rain. I never thought that, they decided to choose money instead of love. Extreme egoism flooded all moral principles. Father Goriots property was bled white and abandoned. Originally the spoiling under the money is so heartbreaking.

He was glowing with pain and memory, always hiding in the lonely grave.

Obedient just quietly indulgence, in exchange for you is just being betrayed.

Father Goriot still adhere to love them, as in the past, there is no reason, nor whether it is worthwhile, maybe, in his heart, so this is love.

The story happened in the past, but affects the future.

In our society, who are the only children in us, and it is groeing up in the doting parents’ love ? The same is the interpretation of love, at different times, what is the difference? As children, to accept the same care, what difference does it make? The same parents, giving this selfless care, and usually in the Father Goriot "refuse to realize ones error"?

It is often said, “This is the product of the society”。 Yes, the society originated from the people, for people in the final analysis, it is still the problem! Human nature on the one hand is missing, that led to all the problems of society the arch-criminal.

Their son is of far-reaching.

Ive seen in a magazine that a story:

Kim was born in a rich family. A few years ago parents opened the gold mine and accumulated vast wealth, becoming the richest man in the village. Rich family make little Kim be spoiled, and develop a wayward character that she love leisure and hate labour. She learned to smoke, drink alcohol, and spend a lot of money. In the countryside, her monthly expense is two thousand yuan, let the other kids out of,. When she was lack of money, she would ask parents for money, sometime little criterion thousands, but sometime over ten thousand. Once, she told a lie to his father for money to buy things, opening, f

​

A Tale of Two Cities is one of Dickens’s masterpieces; the story is an exposure of the contradiction before France Revolution-the appealing of “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” by France lower class.

The main clue of the novel is based on the terrible experience of Dr. Manette, the plot is very complex, attracting, and exciting. Lying at the heart of which we can see the themes from different people.

Sydney Carton

When I read the chapter pertaining to interrogation on Charles Darney, intuition tells that the lawyer assistant who feels at ease with his eyes fixed on the ceiling must be a very special man, which turned out to be right when I finished the whole book. He seems indifferent about everything, even his love. He is brilliant but he thinks otherwise, or rather, he thinks he is inferior to others. Even his master thinks that if he worried about this or that, he would make a great success. Feeling of humbleness is the fatal point leading the loss of his beloved one. If Lucie Manette lives with him, he thinks, she would sustain much hardship. At the end of the story, he sacrifices his life for his love willingly.

Many people say that love is selfish and egocentric, but the temperament of Sydney Carton tells us that love can be sublime and pure. Through this, Dickens tells us loving someone doesn’t mean you should live together with him or her. You can help your beloved one silently, even sacrifice for love. This is universal fraternity, I think, which is the sublimation of normal love. And also, Dickens may indicate that true love really exists, regardless of the situation is full of commotion or not.

Charles Darney

He’s born at a family of royal lineage-the son of Marquis. Regret and abomination fill in his mind for the cruelty and the crime his family have done to the poor. He determines to quit the right of inheritance of his family and moves to England to acting as a French teacher. When he comes back to France, his notorious and sadistic uncle who holds the succession of the family doesn’t welcome him. His uncle is doomed to death because of his cruelty. When he returns to England, he proposes marriage to Lucie Manette. He knows his proposal may not be accepted by Dr.Manette, for he is the son of the enemy of Dr.Manette. After the France Revolution breaks out, he returns to France again to save a servant. But unfortunately, he’s cast into prison.

Lucie Manette

She goes to France with Jarvis Lorry to take her father back, she shows great sympathy to Sydney Carton, and she prayed his husband would get an early deliverance from captivity.

She is a kind-hearted lady made of love and sympathy; she is also the incarnation of elegance.

Dr.Manette

As a victim of the gloom society, he lives a miserable and contradictory life. After releasing from prison, the only thing he does is making shoes, which become worse when he comes across a harsh situation. He loves his daughter just as she does to him, even when he knows that Charles Darney is the son of his enemy, he allow the proposal. And when he notices his daughter was totally down to know the fact that her husband was put into prison, he promise to her that he will rescue him out. He spares no effects to do that, in vain, though.

From this person, Dickens may tells that love between the lower-class family members are as pure as crystal.

Jarvis Lorry

An elderly manager at Tellsons Bank and a dear friend of Dr. Manette. He is very loyal to Dr. Manette. He accompanies them all the time without considering his own life.

Couple Defarge

They’re the leader of the revolution. Ernest Defarge, to some extent, is a good man. He was the servant of Dr.Manette, he provides accommodation for him. But his wife, Madame Defarge, is really a wicked woman. She knits all the time, she wants to kill all the people who lead a richer or happier life just out of envying and revenge. The result turns out to be dramatic: she’s killed by herself as a consequence that the gun goes off by accident.

Resurrection maybe is the main theme in the novel. Dickens here implied that he doesn’t agree the upper class treat the poor badly, meanwhile, he doesn’t agree the lower-class to overthrow the upper class. He hopes that they can live in harmony with each other. Underneath the lines, Dickens wants his readers to be careful that the same sort of revolution that so damaged France wont happen in Britain, which is shown to be nearly as unjust as France. But his warning is addressed not to the British lower classes, but to the aristocracy. He repeatedly uses the metaphor of sowing and reaping; if the aristocracy continues to plant the seeds of a revolution through behaving unjustly, they can be certain of harvesting that revolution in time. The lower classes do not have any agency in this metaphor: they simply react to the behavior of the aristocracy. In this sense it can be said that while Dickens sympathizes with the poor, he identifies with the rich: they are the books audience, its "us" rather than its "them". Crush humanity out of shape once more, under similar hammers, and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.