应用文写作英语四级考试计划通用20篇

一把钥匙配一把锁”，这是我对学习方法的理解。高中的课程比较多，不同的科目有不同的特点，学习方法决不可能千篇一律。最好是能跟随着老师的思路找出这门学科的规律，获得入门的途径，再不断地充实完善，形成不同学科不同的学习方式。正如我前面所说的，我们必须在学的过程中不断地进行归纳改进，摸索出一条最适合自己的方法。以下是我自己的一点学习体会。

有的人说考语文要凭运气，也有的人说要看感觉。运气好或者感觉对的话，就能取得较高的分数，甚至有可能爆个冷门。刚开始我也抱着一种将信将疑的态度，每到考语文之前就要“酝酿”一番，希望能找到所谓的“感觉”。后来，通过与几个同学的交流，加上自己也看了一些师兄师姐们介绍学习经验的书，我渐渐觉得，学语文，是需要一套科学的方法的。?

首先，要多看一些书，这是每个人都有的体会。通过看一些文学名着，或是报刊杂志，可以培养语感，还能学到不少文学常识，以及一些新鲜有趣的观点。现在的语文考试，阅读占了相当大的比例。不仅有文言文阅读，还有科技文、现代文阅读。要想在课堂上把所有这些能力统统培养起来是根本不可能的事，只能靠课外的努力。?

我比较喜欢看像《读者》、《散文》之类的杂志。看《读者》，可以了解到许多独到的观点，看到一些内涵丰厚的文章，使自己也变得爱思考起来。尤其在写作时，我更是常常受到它的启发。现在作文的一个很重要的评分标准就是是否有创新、有与众不同的见解。这样的见解，往往不是凭空就可以产生的。它取决于你的阅历、你的人生体会。对我们中的大多数人来说，生活就是简简单单的两点一线，很少有机会见识到更广阔的世界。因此读书看报就不失为一条捷径。而在时间金钱都有所限制的情况下，看《读者》更不愧为捷径中的捷径。更何况，它也是我们放松自己的好伴侣。?

看《散文》，是通过语文老师的介绍。教我语文的陈武老师是一位文学功底很深的人。他的课真正花在课本上的时间并不多，他更愿意教我们一些从课本里引出来的知识。三年下来，我觉得自己的确学到了许多东西。尤其是文学修养方面提高不少。记得当初他向我们推荐《散文》时，没有说太多，只有几个字我印象特深：“腹中有书气自华。”于是我开始学着欣赏《散文》。刚开始时，也有点云里雾里的感觉，后来，当我静下心来，细细地体会那流淌在字里行间的微妙的感觉，我仿佛一下子就被文字的美攫住了。原来文章还可以这样写!一段很普通的经历到了作家笔下，却完全可以获得诗一般的美感。我喜欢反反复复地读那些自己特别有感触的文字，直到把它们背下，然后不经意地用到自己的作文中，文笔果然有了提高。同时，通过揣摩作者的感受，不知不觉我就养成了一种爱思考的习惯，这一点在做文字表述题的时候特别有用，下手更快，思考角度也更准确。?

此外，有空时多翻翻字典也是一种好办法。例如，做拼音题时，就翻翻《新华字典》，把自己以前读得不准确的字记在一个小本子上，考前再看一看，印象就比较深。另外，平时听新闻时也可多留一个心眼，注意听听播音员的发音，碰到哪个字他发得和你不一样，就记下来，查作文网，看是他发得对还是你发得对，这样做印象特别深。做词语用法的题目时，就翻《现代汉语词典》或《成语词典》。不要局限在要查的那个词上，最好能把前后的词都看一下，既能通过比较加深印象，又能同时学到不少新词。这个工作最好能每天都做，每天记几个，积少成多。记得高三那年，老师让语文科代表每天在教室后面的黑板上抄些成语或容易出错的词语、容易读错的字等，下课后大家都会自觉地去看一看，一些细心的同学还会把它们都整理在一个本子上。到高三下学期做模拟试卷时，我们班同学在这种题上出错的已经很少了。?

在写作方面，除了多看书看报外，还可适当记点日记周记之类，锻炼文笔，久而久之，就会越写越顺。一些喜欢听歌的同学常常会记些喜欢的歌词，在写作时用一用，还真不愧为一种好办法，最起码在语言上就占了不少优势。当然，也可以背一些优美的句子，使它们转化成自己的东西，常记常用，写作水平自然会有所提高。总之，语文就像中药，越熬越有味。当有一天你发现，自己的“感觉”越来越准了时，你的努力就已经得到了回报。?

语文的功夫都在平时的积累上，除了个别“感觉”突然变得特别好的之外，平时是怎样的水平，高考就会考得怎样。与其抱着侥幸的心理等待着“奇迹”出现，还不如踏踏实实地把功夫练到家。考前语文基本上是没什么好复习的，但也不是完全放弃，你可以在复习的间隙看看文学常识，翻翻杂志什么的，或者做一两份模拟试卷，保持对题型的熟悉程度也就足够了。最重要的还是信心问题，千万不要因为平时语文成绩不稳定就对自己失去信心，放下一切的包袱，你一定会在高考考场上有一个新的突破。

语文，有人认为语文最难，为什么呢?因为他们觉得似乎无论他们再怎么努力，起色似乎不大，总的感觉就像是有力无处使，也就是物理中的“不受力”，“做功为0”，事实上，这是由语文自身的转点决定的，语文知识面宽，什么学、词、句、段的分析，什么名言警名等等都包括在里面，而语文考试时不可能什么都考到，因此一些同学在往语文上下功夫时，由于坚持时间不长，过于急躁往往收效不大，甚至毫不起色，对此，我有深刻认识，曾记得高中时，我语文最差，每次考试都是100多一点，在高三第二期第一次模拟中我语文竞然才96分(班上倒数第8)，后来，在语文老师的指导下，我每天坚持阅读一定的优秀短文以增强语感，同时每隔一天做一篇作文，当时我是怎么阅读作文的呢?很简单，每天晨读时，我都会抓出一些自以为good的文章的声朗读，声音越大越好，还有写作文，开始时，我模仿人家的写，甚至干脆“抄袭”，其实抄是一种非常好的办法，通过抄，你就可以体会一篇好的作文它是怎样组织结构的，怎样构思的，怎样谴词造句的。就这样，经过我不懈的努力，当然开始时，没多大用(表面上)，但是，在最后的模拟一、二、三中，我的语文成绩分别是126、127、以至在高考中我的语文得了131分，从而保证了语文的不失败，为进入清华奠定了最好的一步，所以在最后我总结――学语文有二个字的秘诀――“坚持”!

I get up at seven oclock and have breakfast at seven twenty .

At half past seven I go to school by bus . There are four lessons in the morning . At twelve we have lunch .There are two lessons in the afternoon .I go home at four and do my homework at four thirty .At six I have dinner with my parents . After dinner I often play chess with my father .Sometimes I watch TV .Sometimes I listen to music .At eight thirty I go to bed .

这次月考结束了，我觉得英语成绩不太理想。因为总分才127。5，而且还是加上附加分以后的成绩。自我很不满意，相信老师您也是吧！这次必须要好好反思自我到底哪里做得不好。最近我觉得自我的表现也比较差，A组的作文很少交，而且上课也不是很专心，总是和旁边的同学开小差，害得连旁边同学的成绩也一同退步了。背书那方面也不是很用心，记单词短语也马马虎虎，笔记抄了就算，也没有用心去记去背，所以导致这次月考的退步。

从试卷上分析，听力扣了2。5分，比以前都有进步。而单项选取、语法选取、完型填空这些题都是全对的。比较以前算是有很大的进步，因为之前做语法选取和完形填空总会错那么一两题。但阅读题失分就比较严重。错了三题，扣了6分。可能是考试时不够仔细，又比较焦急怕后面的题做不完，所以导致出现了错误。但是最糟糕的还是二卷的部分，作文满分十五分，自我竟然才得了八分。除了有点惊讶外，还有点后悔。后悔没有每一天写好Ａ组的日记，自我的语法错误又错得离谱。可能作文的资料还有点欠缺，而且我看高分的同学的作文字数都写好多，我的字数才她们的一半。所以才丢掉了这么多分。完成句子和单词填空这方面完成的也比较好，就因为完成句子没有注意时态被老师扣了分，虽然没有全对但相比前几次都是有所进步的。附加题部分就做得比较一般，才对了６个。做的时候不是很懂文章的意思，不会的那些都是乱选上去的，所以觉得完型填空这方面还是要多多加强练习才行。不然下次月考又又完型填空附加题，我就好吃亏了。

本人在今后的学习计划是继续坚持做阅读理解和努力背单词，争取能听写都能全对。保证以后认真落实每一个知识点，多点看笔记本和多记笔记里面的知识点，把此刻不会的都补回来，做阅读理解的时候再认真谨慎一点，在保证做题目的速度的同时也要保证正确率。有不会的知识点要及时问问同学或老师您，要及时解决当天课堂上的疑惑，写好课堂的反思，及时给您反馈意见。Ａ组作文要天天坚持写，就算再怎样样也得每个星期写几篇，作文写得太差，不写真的不能提高作文的分数。还有做好笔记，要及时抄，不能拖到回家的时候再抄。还有要整理和背好笔记，因为笔记真的挺重要的。上课必须务必要专心，坚决不和旁边的同学讲话或者开小差，不能影响别人同时自我又听不到老师您讲课。作业也要自我认认真真地写，不能因为一时的懒惰就去抄袭别人的作业。最后就是要在早读时大声并有感情帝朗读好英语，为听说考试做好准备。要好好对待英语，努力学好英语，时刻提醒自我英语需要进步。我不会让老师失望的。

Today is National Day on Oct.1st,2016, we have 7-day holiday, I just made a call to home but mom still didnt get home, I asked mother to try to call her to confirm her position right now in order to be convenient for taking fetch by my father in 6-cross roadmouth. New house has been finished nearly. Dad decided to resume working in Houzai Glass factory just for 350yuan monthly even actually I dont want him to work back. there are 7 days holiday I will take for Chinese National Day. But maybe I need on duty every day. I will come back to Dongguan today.

Summer time is the besttime of the year.There is no school for monthsI get to do what I want.With no tests no homework,Im as free as a bird.

I do many things during the summer vacation.I relax by reading books watching TV.I also hang out with my friends travel with my family.However,I dont play in summer.I take advantage of the free time to learn more.For example,last summer I learned to swim.This summer I might study computers or English.Summer vacation flies by fast,so its important to do as as you can.

暑假计划英语作文三：

How glad I am that summer has come!

真高兴夏天来临了!

I like summer best because I can have a very happy time then. Every summer I stay at my uncles house in the country for some time and enjoy the life there. I can also catch worms that are not found in cities. In addition, I can see many kinds of birds. I think the country is certainly a better place than the city for vacation.

我最喜欢夏天因为我能有一段非常开心的时光。每个夏天我有时住在乡间叔叔家里非常开心。我还能抓到城市里见不到的虫子。另外，我还能看到许多种类的小鸟。我想在乡下度假绝对是个更好的去处。

Summer is my favourite season.

I have a happy holiday. In the holiday. I have do lots of thing.First， I make a plan. Plan about everyday life and study. My life have rule.

Second， I according to plan execuition. Enable my holiday is very amplitude.I watch TV， too. I love English today. Because I like English very much.Sometimes I play the puter. I can watch MTV and learn English on puter.

I have a good holiday.

time reallfast it ifor one year the winter holidawill begin school thimorning. instead of holidaymother ialwayat the beginning of the holidaiasked me to make a plan for the holidathe purpose ito i can arrange well in the holidacan find all kindof fun in learning and can learn more knowledge.

first of all i want a winter vacation homework and assigned bthe teacher good learning taskto complete earnestlmore exercise and keep healthy.

second i want to practice calligraphgrow up to write a good word to see the tv newunderstand the society. i want to insist on keeping a diari used to write diarito cope with the parentto check have no content im going to visit a reference booka daafter the winter break he saw and heard during some of the thoughtit all recorded in the journal to see the wisdom of some mother bought me a back good composition learn the somebodelsewriting methodimprove their writing level. on the internet more time into studying abroad network composition network look at otherihow to write use the method of complement each other to learn more from otherlestime to plasome computer gameit will not onlaffect our studbut also ibad for our eyes.

again when go out to relativemust be polite respect for elders. when the chinese new year to teacherand elderhappnew year.

finalli want to strengthen learning at the same time more to help the familto do some thing in onepower.

oh thiimwinter vacation plan.

时间如流水般淌过，转眼间期中考试也已经结束了，成绩也已经公布了。望着试卷上的分数，我惊讶了。因为这并不是我真正想要的分数。六年级下册的第一次英语期中考试开始了这次考试已成为我学习生涯中最低分的一次考试。在这次英语考试，我竟然考了73分，从三年级开始，到六年级，我从未考过如此低的分数，于是，我开始自我检查。

我次，一到考试的时候总因紧张而很着急，为此，我总结了我没考好的原因：

1.平时没有养成细致认真的习惯，总是不把题目读完就答题，考试的时候答题粗心大意、马马虎虎，导致很多题目会做却被扣分甚至没有做对。

2.在做阅读理解的时候，我根本看都看不懂，这个脑袋都是晕乎乎的，就随便乱蒙了一下，这都是因为单词没有记熟，看到认识的单词，更本想不出意思来，所以，我的阅读理解扣了8分。

3.在考试的前一个晚上没有复习，以前每次英语考试我都会在前天晚上复习好，而在这次考试，我因放了两天假就忘得一干二净了，到了学校才想起来要考试，但我以为这次考试也会像以前考试一样很容易，在考试前10多分钟也不复习，从而导致了考得很不理想。

4.平时回到家的时候，不复习一下英语，但到了星期六、星期天也不把英语书拿出来复习一下，只顾看电视、玩电脑。

5.在平时听单词的时候，总是死记硬背，就在听的时候默得出来，蒙混过关，到了第二天，就全不记得了，导致了在做选出不同类的单词这一题的时候，扣了6分。

自己有很多兴趣，作为一个人，一个完整的人，一个明白的人，当然不应该同机器一样，让自己的兴趣被平白无故抹煞，那样不仅悲惨而且无知，但是，如果因为自己的兴趣严重耽搁了学习就不好了，不仅不好，有时候真的是得不偿失。第一，这次失败的原因是什么?要认真思考，挖掘根本的原因;第二，你接下来要干什么?确定自己的目标，不要因为失败不甘心接着走，而是要正确地衡量自己。看看想要什么，自己的优势在什么地方，弱势是什么;第三，确定目标。明确自己想要的，制定计划，按部就班的走。

时间仿佛过的很快，一眨眼的功夫，却已学期过半。我仔细的倾听钟表的声音，仿佛感到了时光的流淌，生命的流逝。时间仿佛是一片大海，我仿佛是在大海中行舟的那个人。我在着大海中慢慢的成长，进步。刚上海时，由于不适应海上的生活，很长时间里，没有找到行舟的诀窍，因此，并没有比别人划得更好。等到花了六分之一时，才发觉原来划船在海中遨游是如此愉快，虽然需要费力，虽然需要慢慢的学习划船的技巧和精确度。但，我却依然感到快乐无比。因为在这个探究的过程中，我发现了一种超越自我的快乐。

一、 主题句原则

国有其君，家有其主，文章也要有其主。否则会给人造成“群龙无首”之感!相信各位读过一些破烂文学，故意把主体隐藏在文章之内，结果造成我们稀里糊涂!不知所云!所以奉劝各位一定要写一个主题句，放在文章的开头(保险型)或者结尾，让读者一目了然，必会平安无事!

特别提示：隐藏主体句可是要冒险的!

To begin with, you must work hard at your lessons and be fully prepared before the exam(主题句).

Without sufficient preparation, you can hardly expect to answer all the questions correctly.

二、 长短句原则

工作还得一张一驰呢，老让读者读长句，累死人!写一个短小精辟的句子，相反，却可以起到画龙点睛的作用。而且如果我们把短句放在段首或者段末，也可以揭示主题：

As a creature, I eat; as a man, I read. Although one action is to meet the primary need of my body and the other is to satisfy the intellectual need of mind, they are in a way quite similar.

如此可见，长短句结合，抑扬顿挫，岂不爽哉?牢记!

强烈建议：在文章第一段(开头)用一长一短，且先长后短;在文章主体部分，要先用一个短句解释主要意思，然后在阐述几个要点的时候采用先短后长的句群形式，定会让主体部分妙笔生辉!文章结尾一般用一长一短就可以了。

三、 一二三原则

领导讲话总是第一部分、第一点、第二点、第三点、第二部分、第一点…如此罗嗦。可毕竟还是条理清楚。考官们看文章也必然要通过这些关键性的“标签”来判定你的文章是否结构清楚，条理自然。破解方法很简单，只要把下面任何一组的词汇加入到你的几个要点前就清楚了。

1)first, second, third, last(不推荐，原因：俗)

2)firstly, secondly, thirdly, finally(不推荐，原因：俗)

3)the first, the second, the third, the last(不推荐，原因：俗)

4)in the first place, in the second place, in the third place, lastly(不推荐，原因：俗)

5)to begin with, then, furthermore, finally(强烈推荐)

6)to start with, next, in addition, finally(强烈推荐)

7)first and foremost, besides, last but not least(强烈推荐)

8)most important of all, moreover, finally

9)on the one hand, on the other hand(适用于两点的情况)

10)for one thing, for another thing(适用于两点的情况)

建议：不仅仅在写作中注意，平时说话的时候也应该条理清楚!

四、 短语优先原则

写作时，尤其是在考试时，如果使用短语，有两个好处：其一、用短语会使文章增加亮点，如果老师们看到你的文章太简单，看不到一个自己不认识的短语，必然会看你低一等。相反，如果发现亮点—精彩的短语，那么你的文章定会得高分了。其二、关键时刻思维短路，只有凑字数，怎么办?用短语是一个办法!比如：

I cannot bear it.

可以用短语表达：I cannot put up with it.

I want it.

可以用短语表达：I am looking forward to it.

这样字数明显增加，表达也更准确。

五、 多实少虚原则

原因很简单，写文章还是应该写一些实际的东西，不要空话连篇。这就要求一定要多用实词，少用虚词。我这里所说的虚词就是指那些比较大的词。比如我们说一个很好的时候，不应该之说nice这样空洞的词，应该使用一些诸如generous, humorous, interesting, smart, gentle, warm-hearted, hospital 之类的形象词。再比如：

走出房间，general的词是：walk out of the room

但是小偷走出房间应该说：slip out of the room

小姐走出房间应该说：sail out of the room

小孩走出房间应该说：dance out of the room

老人走出房间应该说：stagger out of the room

所以多用实词，少用虚词，文章将会大放异彩!

六、 多变句式原则

1)加法(串联)

都希望写下很长的句子，像个老外似的，可就是怕写错，怎么办，最保险的写长句的方法就是这些，可以在任何句子之间加and, 但最好是前后的句子又先后关系或者并列关系。

比如说： I enjor music and he is fond of playing guitar. 如果是二者并列的，我们可以用一个超级句式：Not only the fur coat is soft, but it is also warm. 其它的短语可以用：besides, furthermore, likewise, moreover

2)转折(拐弯抹角)

批评某人缺点的时候，我们总习惯先拐弯抹角说说他的优点，然后转入正题，再说缺点，这种方式虽然阴险了点，可毕竟还比较容易让人接受。所以呢，我们说话的时候，只要在要点之前先来点废话，注意二者之间用个专这次就够了。

The car was quite old, yet it was in excellent condition.

The coat was thin, but it was warm.

更多的短语：despite that, still, however, nevertheless, in spite of, despite, not with standing

3)因果(so, so, so)

昨天在街上我看到了一个女孩，然后我主动搭讪，然后我们去咖啡厅，然后我们认识了，然后我们成为了朋友…可见，讲故事的时候我们总要追求先后顺序，先什么，后什么，所以然后这个词就变得很常见了。其实这个词表示的是先后或因果关系!

The snow began to fall, so we went home.

更多短语：then, therefore, consequently, accordingly, hence, as a result, for this reason, so that

4)失衡句(头重脚轻，或者头轻脚重)

有些人脑袋大，身体小，或者有些人脑袋小，身体大，虽然我们不希望长成这个样子，可如果真的是这样了，也就必然会吸引别人的注意力。文章中如果出现这样的句子，就更会让考官看到你的句子与众不同。其实就是主语从句，表语从句，宾语从句的变形。

举例：This is what I can do.

Whether he can go with us or not is not sure.

同样主语、宾语、表语可以改成如下的复杂成分：

When to go, Why he goes away…

5)附加(多此一举)

如果有了老婆，总会遇到这样的情况，当你再讲某个人的时候，她会插一句说，我昨天见过他;或者说，就是某某某，如果把老婆的话插入到我们的话里面，那就是定语从句和同位语从句或者是插入语。

The man whom you met yesterday is a friend of mine.

I don’t enjoy that book you are reading.

Mr liu, our oral English teacher, is easy-going.

其实很简单，同位语--要解释的东西删除后不影响整个句子的构成;定语从句—借用之前的关键词并且用其重新组成一个句子插入其中，但是whom or that 关键词必须要紧跟在先行词之前。

6)排比(排山倒海句)

文学作品中最吸引人的地方莫过于此，如果非要让你的文章更加精彩的话，那么我希望你引用一个个的排比句，一个个得对偶句，一个个的不定式，一个个地词，一个个的短语，如此表达将会使文章有排山倒海之势!

Whether your tastes are modern or traditional, sophisticated or simple, there is plenty in London for you.

Nowadays, energy can be obtained through various sources such as oil, coal, natural gas, solar heat, the wind and ocean tides.

We have got to study hard, to enlarge our scope of knowledge, to realize our potentials and to pay for our life. (气势恢宏)

要想写出如此气势恢宏的句子非用排比不可!

七、 挑战极限原则

既然是挑战极限，必然是比较难的，但是并非不可攀!

原理：在学生的文章中，很少发现诸如独立主格的句子，其实也很简单，只要花上5分钟的时间看看就可以领会，它就是分词的一种特殊形式，分词要求主语一致，而独立主格则不然。比如：

The weather being fine, a large number of people went to climb the Western Hills.

Africa is the second largest continent, its size being about three times that of China.

如果您可一些出这样的句子，不得高分才怪!

尊敬的系领导：

你们好!

我是xx系xx级x班的学生，由于在今天的四级考试中利用飞信接收答案已构成作弊行为，被监考老师当场抓获，被抓后我无心考试想的很多，知道自己已经放的一个很大的错误，将会面对什么，但是我知道不管会接受到什么处分我都会接受。

我知道我今天的行为不光彩，就算过的又怎么样，想到被人都是自己的努力才拿到证书，而我却是通过不光彩的方法拿到一张空的证明书。我今天的行为不仅是我自己阴影，也给我们系丢脸的，想到我们班的同学他们平时多么努力的复习英语，而我考试却投机取巧 心存侥幸想蒙骗过关。最后沦为这种地步也是自找的。让自己成为的一个不诚实的人。

天网恢恢，疏而不漏。首先感谢黄主任对我们学生负责监考严明，让我认识的自己的错误，让我能早点改正。还要上系领导道歉，因为我的事情让我，在你们百忙之中来打扰你们。谢谢你们的教育我会好好改正不会让你们失望，在以后的日子里希望你们多多指导，我相信在你们的教育和指导下我会一步步成为一个优秀的大学生，一个合格的社会公民。

检讨人：xx

学生写作时，如果仅局限在把内容交代清楚的水准上，只选用一些普通的、直截了当的词，或一律使用简单句平铺直叙，那么，这样写出来的文章就会像一碗白开水，呆板、单调，没有可读性。下面是小编整理的英语作文写作10大技巧，欢迎阅读。

1. 灵活改变句子开头

在通常情况下，英语句子的排列方式为“主语+谓语+宾语”，即主语位于句子开头。但若根据情况适当改变句子的开头方式，比如使用倒状语或以状语开头等，会使文章增强表现力。如：

(1) There stands an old temple at the top of the hill.

→ At the top of the hill there stands an old temple.

在小山顶上有一座古庙。

(2) You can do it well only in this way.

→ Only in this way can you do it well.

只有这样你才能把它做好。

(3) A young woman sat by the window.

→ By the window sat a young woman.

窗户边坐着一个年轻妇女。

2. 避免重复使用同一词语

为了使表达更生动，更富表现力，同学们在写作时应尽量避免重复使用同一词语来表示同一意思，尤其是一些老生常谈的词语。如有的同学一看到“喜欢”二字，就会立刻想起like，事实上，英语中表示类似意思的词和短语很多，如 love, enjoy, prefer, appreciate, be fond of, care for等。如：

I like reading while my brother likes watching television.

→ I like reading while my brother enjoys watching television.

我喜欢看书，而我的兄弟却喜欢看电视。

3. 合理使用省略句

合理恰当地使用省略句，不仅可以使文章精练、简洁，而且会使文章更具文采和可读性。如：

(1) He may be busy. If he’s busy, I’ll call later. If he is not busy, can I see him now?

→ He may be busy. If so, I’ll call later. If not, can I see him now?

他可能很忙，要是这样，我以后再来拜访。要是不忙，我现在可以见他吗?

(2) If the weather is fine, we’ll go. If it is not fine, we’ll not go.

→ If the weather is fine, we’ll go. If not, not.

如果天气好，我们就去;如果天气不好，我们就不去了。

(3) She could have applied for that job, but she didn’t do so.

→ She could have applied for that job, but she didn’t.

她本可申请这份工作的，但她没有。

4. 适当运用非谓语结构

非谓语结构通常被认为是一种高级结构，适当运用非谓语结构，会给人一种熟练驾驭语言的印象。如：

(1) When he heard the news, they all jumped for joy.

→ Hearing the news, they all jumped for joy.

听了这消息他们都高兴得跳了起来。

(2) As I didn’t know her address, I wasn’t able to get in touch with her.

→ Not knowing her address, I wasn’t able to get in touch with her.

由于不知道她的地址，我没法和她联系。

(3) As he was born into a peasant family, he had only two years of schooling.

→ Born into a peasant family, he had only two years of schooling.

他出生农民家庭，只上过两年学。

5. 结合使用长句与短句

在英语写作中，过多地使用长句或过多地使用短句都不好。正确的做法是，根据实际情况在文章中交替使用长句与短语，使文章显得错落有致，这样不仅使文章在形式上增加美感，而且使文章读起来铿锵有力。如：

At noon we had a picnic lunch in the sunshine. Then we had a short rest. Then we began to play happily. We sang and danced. Some told stories. Some played chess.

→ At noon we had a picnic lunch in the sunshine. After a short rest, we had great fun singing and dancing, telling jokes and playing chess.

中午我们晒着太阳吃野餐。休息一会儿后，我们唱的唱歌，跳的跳舞，还有的讲笑话、下棋，大家玩得很开心。

6. 适当使用短语代替单词

(1) He has decided to be a teacher when he grows up.

→ He has made up his mind to be a teacher when he grows up.

他已决定长大了当老师。

(2) He doesnt like music.

→ He doesnt care much for music.

他不大喜欢音乐。

(3) He told me that the question was now under discussion.

→ He told me that the question was now being discussed.

他告诉我问题现正正在讨论中。

7. 恰当套用某些固定表达

(1) He was very tired. He couldn’t walk any farther.

→ He was too tired to walk any farther.

他太累了，不能再往前走了。

(2) The film was very interesting. Both the teachers and the students liked it.

→ The film was so interesting that both the teachers and the students liked it.

这电影很有趣，学生和老师都很喜欢。

(3) Your son is old. He can look after himself now.

→ Your son is old enough to look after himself now.

你的儿子已经长大，可以自己照顾自己了。

8. 尽量使句子带点“洋味”

(1) Dont worry. Be bold and try it, and youll learn it soon.

→Dont worry. Just go for it, and youll get it soon.

别担心，大胆试一试，你很快就会学会的。

(2) Thank you for playing with us.

→Thank you for sharing the time with us.

谢谢你陪我玩。

9. 综合使用各类所谓的“高级”结构

(1) Now everyone knows the news. I think Jim must have let it out.

→ Now everyone knows the news. I think it must have been Jim who has let it out.

现在人人都知道这消息了，我想一定是吉姆把它泄露出去的。

(2) We had to stand there to catch the offender.

→ What we had to do was (to) stand there, trying to catch the offender.

我们所能做的只是站在那儿，设法抓住违章者。

(3) If her pronunciation is not better than her teacher’s, it is at least as good as her teacher’s.

→ Her pronunciation is as good as, if not better than, her teacher’s.

如果她的语音不比她的老师好的话，至少也不会比她老师的差。

10. 适当使用名言警句点缀

在写作时根据实际情况恰当地用上一两句名言警句来点缀文章，不仅使文章显得有深度、有智慧，而且会让文章在评分中上一个“得分档次”。如：

(1) As the proverb says, “Where there is a will, there is a way.” Though you fail this time, you needn’t lose heart. As long as you work hard and stick to your dream, you will succeed one day.

(2) There is a proverb goes like this “Life isn’t a bed of roses.” It is ture that it is likely for everyone to meet problems and difficulties in life.

(3) In the modern world, more and more people live alone, which is not so good for our life. It is better for us to make more friends and enjoy friendship. Just as a proverb says, “A near friend is better than a far-dwelling kinsman.”

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

This morning, my father took me to school by bike. I sat at the back of the bike, eating abanana. After I ate it up, I threw the skin onto the street randomly. No sooner had I done thisthan I realized that I had done something bad to our environment. And maybe someone wouldstep on it and tumbleover. I must pick it up. Thinking of these, I asked father to stop. I jumpedoffthe bike and ran back to pick up the banana skin and threw it into a roadside dustbin. Seeingthis, father praised me and I felt very happy.

In future I will protect the surroundings more consciously and think more about others.

上学路上

今天早晨，爸爸骑车带我去上学。我坐在后车座上，吃着香蕉。吃完后，我顺手将香蕉皮扔到了街上。我马上意识到我的所作所为破坏了我们的环境，或许有人会踩在上面而跌倒，我必须把它拾起来。想到这些，我让爸爸停车。我跳下自行车，跑回去拾起香蕉皮，并扔到了路边的垃圾箱里。看到这些，爸爸表扬了我。我感到很高兴。

将来我要更自觉地保护周围的环境，更多地为他人着想。

have a travel plan.I’m going to be in the Shaihai from January eighteenth to the twenty-fifth.I’m going to buy some clothes and books.I’m going to be in the Chouzhou from January twenty-sixth to the thirty-first.

I’m going to visit my grandma .I’m going to be in the Guangzhou from February first to the fifteenth.I’m going to Disney Land.

经过一阶段的紧张学习，我们将迎来六年级第二学期的期末考试。俗话说：工欲善其事，必先利其器，期末考试也是一样。我觉得要想取得好成绩，除了平时努力学习，打好基础，提高能力外，期末复习方法也很关键。复习方法多种多样，我应该根据自己的实际情况，选取科学、高效的复习方法。

复习计划如下：

要珍惜时间，合理安排时间。时间是宝贵的，合理安排时间，把应该复习的复习好，适当的给自己休息时间。根据具体的时间情况和各门功课的实际情况，合理安排好复习计划。

上复习课时要认真听讲，勤于思考，勤于动脑。

复习时要强化记忆，使学习的成果牢固地贮存在大脑里，以便随时取用;查漏补缺，保证知识的完整性;融会贯通，使知识系统化。

到了最后阶段，不宜再复习所有知识点，把重点要深入掌握，争取不让自己会的东西再丢分，保证拿到基础分的前提下，细化知识点。

应该把做过的练习进行总结和归类，对于自己不明白并且是考点的要积极的课后问老师。

在考前复习时，要总结一些技巧，并要梳理一下做题的思路。对于老师没画重点的科目，自己要对知识点系统总结，把握规律，找出认为是重点的地方深度记忆。

On May 1sh,I m going to my grandmother s home.I think that must be very significative.Because she is too old to visit me and my parents,and she must be very have in mind our.

I will go for a walk with my grandmother and buy she some summer wears.they must fit her like best.Of course ,I don t think that is a easy work!So it must takes me many time.

After shopping,we will have a good rest and have lunch in my grandmother s home.

And then,I will clean the home with my grandmother.

At last,I go home.

Of course,I must finish my homewolk.

作为职业经理人,尤其是每天批文十数件以上,且直辖员工达到5人以上的,你们是否经常因为文件起草不标准的问题而烦恼?那么今天，我们将为您解决这个困扰!——起草公文的基本排版格式

标题：二号方正大标宋(党口公文)，二号方正小标宋(政口公文)

副标题为三号宋体加粗，格式为右对齐，作者单位全称、作者职务、姓名(注明“根据录音整理”及讲话的时间)

一、标题规范

1、标题字体。

标题字体为华文中宋，小二号字，加粗，格式为居中。副标题为宋体，三号字，加粗，格式为右对齐。

2、作者与题注。

一般公文只有标题，没有作者和题注。

如属讲话稿之类要标明作者的，应在标题下一行加上作者单位全称、作者职务、姓名，职务与姓名之间空一格。如属汇报类公文，则标明汇报单位全称，用楷体，三号字，加粗，居中。

如果属录音整理则应在讲话者的下一行注明“根据录音整理”及讲话的时间;如属汇报类公文，则要标注汇报时间。这一行全部用楷体，三号，加粗，居中;这一行往往要用小括号括起来。

二、抬头规范

请示、报告、函等公文应有明确的抬头。有抬头的，抬头顶格。一般发往全系统的文件抬头为“各地级市工商行政管理局”;要发往含广州、深圳在内的全系统则为“各地级以上市工商行政管理局”;如果仅发往部分市局则用“珠海、汕头等市工商行政管理局”。发往省局机关内部则是“省局机关各处室、直属各单位”;如果仅发部分处室则是“省局机关有关处室，直属有关单位”;收文单位少的，则直接用收文单位规范简称(见省局电话号码表)。同时发往市局与省局机关处室的，市局与省局机关处室之间用逗号，处室与直属单位之间用顿号。发往其它单位的公文一律用规范名称作抬头。

原则上省局不直接往县级单位发文。

三、纲目规范

1、一级标题。

一级标题为黑体字，标号后用顿号，标题尾无标点符号。一级标题应单独为一段。(例：一、标题规范)

2、二级标题。

二级标题用国标楷体，加粗，标题用括号;标号与标题之间没有符号，标题尾用句号。二级标题原则上应单独为一段。(例：(二)二级标题。)

3、三级标题。

三级标题用阿拉伯数字，标题文字用国标仿宋，加粗;标号与标题之间用小园点(要用全角)，标题尾用句号。三级标题可根据实际情况单独或不独立设为一段。(例： 3.三级标题。)

4、四级标题。

四级标题用小括号阿拉伯数字，字体字号与正文一致;标号与标题之间没有符号。四级标题原则上不单独设段。(例：(4)四级标题。)

5、正文。

抬头与正文一律用国标仿宋，小三号，两端对齐，段前空两格(一般是中文两个汉字的距离)，标点符号一律用全角。文本用标准A4纸，页面设置用标准格式(即页边距设置为上、下为2.54厘米，左右为3.17厘米，页眉1.5厘米，页脚1.75厘米，文档网络设置为“只指定行网络”，每页44行)。

标题之前空一行;标题与正文之间空一行;正文中一般不出现空行。

四、落款规范

如起草省局文件，应在文章结尾、正文右下角标注时间，但不标注起草单位(落款处发文时盖章);如果起草素质教育中心文件，则应在文章结尾标注单位和时间;如起草领导讲话及汇报等公文，因题注部分已经有作者和时间，不再另添加落款和时间。

如果属录音整理，应在文章结尾标明整理人，整理时间。

其它文体可不标注单位和时间。标注时间用“插入”中的“插入时间”(中文格式)例如“二○一五年五月二十日”。

任何公文、记录、整理都应插入页码。

以上是应用文写作的基本标准，在实践过程中，企业可根据实际情况合理修订。

时光如水，岁月如歌。一个月期一眨眼就要过去了。将近期末了，为了我的寒假过得开心点，所以我必须做好期末的复习计划，内容如下：

1、克制自己贪玩的欲望。到了临近期末考试的时刻，每天晚上应适当减少玩儿和娱乐休闲的时间。多拿出些时间来看看书。

2、上课认真听讲、积极发言，课下认真复习(语数英)。上课一定要集中精力，不要走神，画出老师说的重点。课下不要光想着玩儿，没事就拿出自己的书来看一看，回顾一下。

3、每天晚上定时定量复习一个单元(语文)。抓住每一课的重点句子多读几遍。要背过这个句子的理解、体会作者的写作手法，还要掌握这个句子的修辞方法，并说一说这里运用比喻或者拟人的修辞方法有什么好处。还要知道这篇课文讲的是一件什么事，发生在哪个时期，借这个故事来赞扬谁，或者赞颂了一种什么样的精神。记一记词语盘点的词，背一背日积月累。(数学)背一背这个单元的定义，再做一遍书上的题，还要做一些课外的辅导题，多掌握一些体型。(英语)重点背这个单元的单词、粗体句子。掌握句式，学会运用。

4、多练笔(语文)。在最后的这几周时间里，应该多写写作文，而且要从多方面入手：写人、写景、写物、写事、写读后感观后感、缩写、想象、写信、看图作文、发言稿、写研究报告，总之，可选的主题有太多太多……

这就是我的期末考试复习计划，同学们如果还有更好的建议，可以说出去跟大家一起分享。让我们一起好好复习，迎接期末考试吧。

导语：盛夏七月，燥热难耐，学生们摆脱了作业的束缚，拥堵的课程，迎来了快乐的暑假生活。

Here comes the summer holiday, I have planneda busy schedule on it.

暑假就要到来了，我已经为它制定了一个忙绿的计划表了。

Firstly, I will find a part time job,probably work in a factory which is near my home, so that I can accompany withmy parents. Secondly, I have joined a violin course in the previous time,because I have interest on it. therefore, I will do more practice at home by myself.As an old saying goes, practice makes perfect. At the end of the holiday, it’stime for me to have a good time. I tend to go on a trip with my friends, maybe Yunnanor other wonderful places. Travel to the place I have never been to certainlycan broaden my mine.

首先，我会找一份兼职，也许在我家附近的工厂工作，这样我就可以陪陪我父母。其次，之前我参加了一个小提琴的培训班，因为我对它很有兴趣。所以，我会在家多多联系。因为正如谚语所说的，熟能生巧。在假期末尾的时候，我会去好好地玩一玩。我比较想和朋友去旅行，也许去云南，也许是其他地方。去那些我从来没去过的地方肯定可以开拓我的视野。

Make a good plan and enjoy it. I hope weall can have a meaningful holiday.

制定一个好的计划并玩得开心。我希望大家都能有一个有意义的假期。

一学期的教学工作不知不觉快要结束了。为了迎接期末检测，切实提高学生实际语文能力，挖掘出学生的学习积极性和学习潜在能力，特写复习计划。依照计划，在不足一个月的时间内，将本学期的整册教材由教师带领学生梳理，复习基础知识，进一步理解重、难点，在原有的基础上，加深理解，巩固知识，查漏补缺，提优补差，使所有学生通过复习都能有所收获，争取语文整体教学质量有所提高。

一、学生学情分析：

通过一个学期的学习，本班有百分之五十的学生能在老师的引导导下，主动参与学习，掌握了基本的学习方法，初步学会独立识字。能运用学过的词语造句说话，会给部分学过的词找出近义词和反义词。能听懂别人讲的一件事，边听边记住主要内容，并能简单复述。能正确朗读课文，会默读文，能说出一个自然段主要讲什么，理解课文，具备了一定的阅读能力。对短文能静下心来认读，对文中的词句能有意识地深入的体会和理解，知道抓住关键词句感悟其内涵。但因为学生受能力差异较大，有百分之三十的学生受智力因素和非智力因素的影响，学习情况参差不齐。其中有许多学生的学习习惯还欠培养，书写马虎，学习懒惰，怕吃苦，依赖思想严重习法不够科学。甚至不能按时完成作业。从整体来说，学生的习作能力有待提高。很多学生作动笔前的构思还不够，作文缺少创意。行文中，出现不具体、不生动，没有个性的张扬等现象，公式化较严重。作文格式仍然有许多同学出错，讲了无数遍依然要讲。

二、复习内容：

1

、掌握本册要求写的199个生字及相关词语(包括查字典、组词、多音字组词、成语、近反义词、用词语及关联词语造句、学会联系上下文理解词语的意思)。

2

、学会写各种句子(包括主、被动句、扩、缩句、修辞句、陈述句、反问句、修改病句、补充句子、排列句子)。

3

、掌握先概括后具体的构段方法，能正确分析段落，初步掌握分段知识，能简单概括段意、能找出中心句、能回答与文章有关的问题。注重训练回答问题的模式、答题的规范性、全面性。

4

、掌握要求背诵的课文，并进行与课文相关的积累的巩固。写我的复习计划的作文450字,四年级。

National Day is coming.I like traveling very much.I want to travel all over the world.Because I think traveling is quite interesting.At the same time,we can watch beautiful scenery.It also can open our eyes.

If I have the chance,I want to go to Beijing first,because its our capital.There are many famous places of interest to go,such as the Great Wall,Tian‘anmen Square,Beihai Park and so on.Ill take many photos,because they will help me remember the trip forever.We know the Olympic Games has been held in Beijing .All people in Beijing have being trying their best to make beijing more beautiful.I hope I can watch the best beautiful beijing.I will go there by train.I think traveling by train is far more comfortable and cheaper国庆节快到了.我非常喜欢旅游.我想要环游世界.因为我认为旅游是相当有趣的.与此同时,我们还能看到美丽的风景.它也可以打开我们的眼睛.

如果我有机会的话,我想去北京的第一,因为它是我们的首都.有许多著名的名胜古迹去,例如长城、天安门广场,北海公园等等.我要带许多照片,因为他们将帮助我记住这次旅行,直到永远.我们知道奥运会已经在北京举行.所有的人都在北京正在尽最大的努力使北京更加美丽.我希望我能看最好的北京.我要乘火车去那儿.我想坐火车旅行远更舒适、更便宜