成功需要勤奋英语作文(汇编20篇)

​导语：动物是自然资源，在整个历史过程中，人类一直在糟蹋着这种资源。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语作文，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

Animals are natural resources that people have wasted all through our history. Animals have been killed for their fur and feathers, for food, for sport, and simply because they were in the way. Thousands of kinds of animals have disappeared from the earth forever. Hundreds more are on the danger list today. About 170 kinds in the United States alone are considered in danger.

Why should people care? Because we need animals, and because once they are gone, there will never be any more.Animals are more than just beautiful or interesting. They are more than just a source of food. Every animal has its place in the balance of nature. Destroying one kind of animal can create many problems. For example, when farmers killed large numbers of hawks, the farmers stores of corn and grain were destroyed by rats and mice. Why? Because hawks eat rats and mice, with no hawks to keep down their numbers, the rats and mice multiplied quickly.

Luckily, some people are working to help save the animals. Some groups raise money to let people know about the problem. And they try to get the governments to pass laws protecting animals in danger. Quite a few countries have passed laws. These laws forbid the killing of any animal or planton the danger list. Slowly, the number of some animals in danger is growing.

【参考译文】

动物需要人类的保护

动物是自然资源，在整个历史过程中，人类一直在糟蹋着这种资源。人们杀死动物 ，获得它们的皮毛，把它们当作食物或运动方式，或者只是因为它们碍事。成千上万种动物 已经从这个地球上永远地消失了。现在另外上百种动物 也上了濒危动物 名单。仅荚国大概就有170种被认为处于危险当中。

为什么人们应该感到担忧呢?因为我们需要动物 ，因为它们一旦消失，就永远不会再出现。动物 不仅仅是漂亮或有趣。它们不仅仅是人类的食物来源。在维持自然平衡中，每种动物 都有其作用。毁灭某种动物 会导致许多问题。比如，农民们如果杀死为数众多的鹰，他们谷物和粮食的仓库就会受到老鼠和田鼠的破坏。 为什么?因为鹰吃鼠类，没有鹰控制它们的数量，鼠类就会迅速繁殖。

幸运的是，有些人正在努力帮助拯救这些动物 。有些组织筹钱以便人们了解这一问题。他们也努力使政府通过保护 濒危动物 的法律。很多国家已经通过了法律。这些法律禁止杀害濒危名单上的动植物。某些濒危动物 的数目正在慢慢地不断上升。

下面的材料旨在丰富学生在是非问题写作方面的思想和语言，考生在复习时可以先分类阅读这些篇章，然后尝试写相关方面的作文题。

对于素材中用黑体字的部分，特别建议你熟读，背诵，因为它们在语言和观点上都值得吸收。学习语言的人应该明白，表达能力和思想深度都靠日积月累，潜移默化。从某种意义上说，提高英语写作能力无捷径可走，你必须大段背诵英语文章才能逐渐形成语感和用英语进行表达的能力。这一关，没有任何人能代替你过。

因此，建议你下点苦功夫，把背单词的精神拿出来背诵文章。何况，并不是要求你背了之后永远牢记在心：你可以这个星期背，下个星期忘。这没有关系，相信你的大脑具有神奇的能力。背了工具箱里的文章后，你会惊讶的发现：I can think in English now！

1.?????? Proverbs

1. A graduation ceremony is an event where the commencement speaker tells thousands of students dressed in identical caps and gowns that individuality is the key to success.

2. The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one’s mind a pleasant place in which to spend one’s time.

3. Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained.

4. The classroom--not the trench--is the frontier of freedom now and forevermore.

5. Education’s purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

6. It is the purpose of education to help us become autonomous, creative, inquiring people who have the will and intelligence to create our own destiny.

7. You see, real ongoing, lifelong education doesn’t answer questions; it provokes them.

8. People will pay more to be entertained than educated.

9.the most important function of education at any level is to develop the personality of the individual and the significance of his life to himself and to others. This is the basic architecture of a life; the rest is ornamentation and decoration of the structure.

10. The essence of our efforts to see that every child has a chance must be to assure each as equal opportunity, not to become equal, but to become different-to realize whatever unique potential of body, mind, and spirit he or she possesses.

11. A great teacher never strives to explain his vision-he simply invites you to stand beside him and see for yourself.

12. If you can read and don’, you are an illiterate by choice.

2. Damaging Research

A study by National Parent-Teacher Organization revealed that in the average American school, eighteen negatives are identified for every positive that is pointed out. The Wisconsin study revealed that when children enter the first grade, 80 percent of them feel pretty good themselves, but by the time they get to the sixth grade, only 10 percent of them have good self-images.

3. Education and Citizenship

An important aspect of education in the United States is the relationship between education and citizenship. Throughout its history this nation has emphasized public education as a means of transmitting democratic values, creating equality of opportunity, and preparing new generations of citizens to function in society. In addition, the schools have been expected to help shape society itself. During the 1950s, for example, efforts to combat racial segregation focused on the schools. Later, when the Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite, American schools and colleges came under intense pressure and were offered many incentives to improve their science and mathematics programs so that the nations would not fall behind the Soviet Union in scientific and technological capabilities.

Education is often viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The schools, t is thought, can transform young people from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. Yet these goals seem almost impossible to attain. In recent years, in fact, public education has been at the center of numerous controversies arising from the gap between the ideal and the reality. Part of the problem is that different groups in society have different have different expectations. Some feel that children should be taught basic job-related skills; still others believe education should not only prepare children to compete in society but also help them maintain their cultural identity (and, in the case of Hispanic children, their language). On the other hand, policymakers concerned with education emphasize the need to increase the level of student achievement and to improve parents in their children’s education.

Some reformers and critics have called attention to the need to link formal schooling with programs designed to address social problems. Sociologist Charles Moscos, for example, is a leader in the movement to expand programs like the Peace Corps, Vista, and Outward Bound into a system of voluntary national service. National service, as Moscos defines it, would entail “the full-time undertaking of public duties by young people whether as citizen soldiers or civilian servers-who are paid subsistence wages” and serve for at least one year. In return for this period of service, the volunteers would receive assistance in paying for college or other educational expenses.

Advocates of national service and school-to-work programs believe that education does not have to be confined to formal schooling. In devising strategies to provide opportunities for young people to serve their society, they emphasize the educational value of citizenship experiences gained outside the classroom. At this writing there is little indication that national service will become a new educational institution in the United States, although the concept is steadily gaining support among educators and social critics.

4. The Teacher’s Role

Given the undeniable importance of classroom experience, sociologists have done a considerable amount of research on what goes on in the classroom. Often they start from the premise that, along with the influence of peers, students’ experiences in the classroom are of central importance to their later development. One study examined the impact of a single first-grade teacher on her students’ subsequent adult status. The surprising results of this study have important implications. It is evident that good teachers can make a big difference in children’s lives, a fact that gives increased urgency to the need to improve the quality of primary-school teaching. The reforms carried out by educational leaders like James Comer suggest that when good teaching is combined with high levels of parental involvement the results can be even more dramatic.

Because the role of the teacher is to change the learner in some way, the teacher-student relationship is an important part of education. Sociologists have pointed out that this relationship is asymmetrical or unbalanced, with the teacher being in a position of authority and the student having little choice but to passively absorb the information provided by the teacher. In other words, in conventional classrooms there is little opportunity for the students to become actively involved in the learning process. On the other hand, students often develop strategies for undercutting the teacher’s authority: mentally withdrawing, interrupting, and the like. Hence, much current research assumes that students and teachers influence each other instead of assuming that the influence is always in a single direction.

5. Education Philosophy

For the past fifty years our schools have operated on the theories of John Dewey (1859-1953), an American educator and writer. Dewey believed hat the school’s job was to enhance the natural development of the growing child, rather than to pour information, for which the child had no context, into him or her. In the Dewey system, the child becomes the active agent in his own education, rather than a passive receptacle for facts.

Consequently, American schools are very enthusiastic about teaching “life skills” –logical thinking, analysis, creative problem--solving. The actual content of the lessons is secondary to the process, which is supposed to train the child to be able to handle whatever life may present, including all the unknowns of the future. Students and teachers both regard pure memorization as an uncreative and somewhat vulgar.

In addition to “life skills”, schools are assigned to solve the ever growing stoke of social problems. Racism, teenage pregnancy, alcoholism, drug use, reckless driving, and are just a few of the modern problems that have appeared on the school curriculum.

This all contributes to a high degree of social awareness in American youngsters.

6. Student Life

To the students, the most notable difference between elementary school and the higher levels is that in junior high they start “changing classes”. This means that rather than spending the day in one classroom, they switch classrooms to meet their different teachers. This gives them three or four minutes between classes in the hallways, where a great deal of the important social action of high school traditionally takes place. Students have lockers in these hallways, around which thy congregate.

Society in general does not take the business of studying very seriously. Schoolchildren have a great deal of free time, which they are encouraged to fill with extracurricular activities—sports, clubs, cheerleading, scouts—supposed to inculcate such qualities as leadership, sportsmanship, ability to organize, etc. those who don’t become engaged in such activities or have afterschool jobs have plenty of opportunity to “hang out”, listen to teenager music, and watch television.

Compared to other nations, American students do not have much homework. Studies also show that American parents have lower expectations for their children’s success in school than other nationalities do. (Historically, there has not been much correlation between American school success and success in later life.) “He’s just not a scholar”, the American parents might say, content that their son is on the swim team and doesn’t take drugs. (Some of the young do choose to study hard, for reason of their own, such as determining that the road to riches lies through Harvard Business School.)

What American schools do effectively teach is the competitive method. In innumerable ways children are pitted against each other—whether in classroom discussion, spelling bees, reading groups, or tests. Every classroom is expected to produce a scattering of A’s and F’s (teachers often grade A=excellent; B=good; C=average; D=poor; and F=failed). A teacher who gives all A’s looks too soft—so students are aware that they are competing for the limited number of top marks.

Foreign students sometimes don’t understand that copying from other people’s papers or from books is considered wrong and taken seriously. Here, it is important to show that you have done your own work and are displaying your own knowledge. It is more important than helping your friends to pass, whom we think do not deserve to pass unless they can provide their own answers. Group effort goes against the competitive grain, and American students do not study together as many Asians do. Many Asians in this country consider their group study habits a large contributor to their school success.

7. Adult Education

After complaining about many aspects of American life, a 40-year-old woman from Hong Kong concluded, “But where else could someone my age go back to school and get a degree in social work? Here you can change your whole life, start a new business, do what you really want to do.”

So at least to this person, school requirements weren’t inhibiting. And to millions of others, adult education is the path to a new career, or if not to a new career, to a new outlook. Schools generally encourage the older person who wants to start anew, and besides regular classes, schedule evening classes in special programs. Today there are so many people of retirement age in college that it is no longer remarkable.

8. Moral Relativism in American

Improving American education requires not doing new things but doing (and remembering) some good old things. At the time of our nation’s founding, Thomas Jefferson listed the requirements for a sound education in the Report of the Commissioners for the University of Virginia. In this landmark statement on American education, Jefferson wrote of the importance of education and writing, and of reading history, and geography. But he also emphasized the need “to instruct the mass of our citizens in these, their rights, interests, and duties, as men and citizens.” Jefferson believed education should aim at the improvement of both one’s “morals” and “faculties”. That has been the dominant view of the aims of American education for over two centuries. But a number of changes, most of them unsound, have diverted schools from these great pursuits. And the story of the loss of the school’s original moral mission explains a great deal.

Starting in the early seventies, “values clarification” programs started turning up in schools all over America. According to this philosophy, the schools were not to take part in their time-honored task of transmitting sound moral values; rather, they were to allow the child to “clarify” his own values (which adults, including parents, had no “rights” to criticize). The “values clarification” movement didn’t clarify values; it clarified wants and desires. This form of moral relativism said, in effect, that no set of values was right or wrong; everybody had an equal right to his own values; and all values were subjective, relative, and personal. This destructive view took hold with a vengeance.

In 1985 The York Times published an article quoting New York area educators, in slavish devotion to this new view, proclaiming, “They deliberately avoid trying to tell students what is ethically right and wrong.” The article told of one counseling session involving fifteen high school juniors and seniors. In the course of that session a student concluded that a fellow student had been foolish to return one thousand dollars she found in a purse at school. According to the article, when the youngsters asked the counselor’s opinion, “He told them he believed the girl had done the right thing, but that, of course, he would not try to force his values on them. ‘If I come from the position of what is wrong,’ he explained, ‘then I’m not their counselor.’”

Once upon a time, a counselor offered counselor, and he knew that an adult does not form character in the young by taking a stance of neutrality toward questions of right and wrong or by merely offering “choices” or “options”.

In response to the belief that adults and educators should teach children sound morals, one can expect from some quarters indignant objections (I’ve heard one version of it expressed countless times over the years): “Who are you to say what’s important?” or “Whose standards and judgments do we use?”

The correct response, it seems to me, is, is we ready to do away with standards and judgments? Is anyone going to argue seriously that a life of cheating and swindling is as worthy as a life of honest, hard work? Is anyone (with the exception of some literature professors at our elite universities) going to argue seriously the intellectual corollary, that a Marvel comic book is as good as Macbeth? Unless we are willing to embrace some pretty silly position, we’ve got to admit the need for moral and intellectual standards. The problem is that some people tend to regard anyone who would pronounce a definitive judgment as an unsophisticated Philistine or a closed-minded “elitist” trying to impose his view on everybody else.

The truth of the real world is that without standards and judgments, there can be no progress. Unless we are prepared to say irrational things—that nothing can be proven more valuable than anything else or that everything is equally worthless—we must ask the normative question. It may come, as a surprise to those who fell that to be “progressive” is to be value-neutral. But as Matthew Amold said, “the world is forwarded by having its attention fixed on the best things” and if the world can’t decide what the best things are, at least to some degree, then it follows that progress, and character, is in trouble. We shouldn’t be reluctant to declare that some things, some lives, books, ideas, and values are better than others. It is the responsibility of the schools to teach these better things.

At one time, we weren’t so reluctant to teach them. In the mid-nineteenth century, a diverse, widespread group of crusaders began to work for the public support of what was then called the “common school”, the forerunner of the public school. They were to be charged with the mission of school felt that the nation could fulfill its destiny only if every new generation was taught these values together in a common institution.

The leaders of the common school movement were mainly citizens who were prominent in their communities—businessmen, ministers, local civic and government officials. These people saw the schools as upholders of standards of individual morality and small incubators of civic and personal virtue; the founders of the public schools had faith that public education could teach good moral and civic character from a common ground of American values.

But in the past quarter century or so, some of the so-called experts became experts of value neutrality, and moral education was increasingly left in their hands. The commonsense view of parents and the publicthat schools should reinforce rather than undermine the values of home, family, and country, was increasingly rejected.

There are those today still that claim we are now too diverse a nation, that we consist of too many competing convictions and interests to instill common values. They are wrong. Of course we are a diverse people. We have always been a diverse people. And as Madison wrote in FederalistNo.10, the competing, balancing interests of a diverse people can help ensure the survival of liberty. But there are values that all American citizens share and that we should want all American students to know and to make their own: honesty, fairness, self-discipline, fidelity to task, friends, and family, personal responsibility, love of country, and belief in the principles of liberty, equality, and the freedom to practice one’s faith. The explicit teaching of these values is the legacy of the common schools, and it is a legacy to which we must return.

9. Schools Should Teach Values

People often said, “Yes, we should teach these values, but how do we teach them?” this question deserves a candid response, one that isn’t given often enough. It is by exposing our children to good character and inviting its imitation that we will transmit to them a moral foundation. This happens when teachers and principals, by their words and actions, embody sound convictions. As Oxford’s Mary Warnock has written, “You cannot teach morality without being committed to morality yourself; and you cannot be committed to morality yourself without holding that some things are right and others wrong.” The theologian Martin Buber wrote that the educator is distinguished from all other influences “by his will to take part in the stamping of character and by his consciousness that he represents in the eyes of the growing person a certain selection of what is, the selection of what is ‘right’, of what should be.” It is in this will, Buber says, in this clear standing for something, that the “vocation as an educator finds its fundamental expression.”

There is no escaping the fact that young people need as example principals and teachers who know the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, and who themselves exemplify high moral purpose.

As Education Secretary, I visited a class at Waterbury Elementary School in Waterbury, Vermont, and asked the students, “Is this a good school?” They answered, “Yes, this is a good school.” I asked them, “Why?” Among other things, one eight-year-old said, “The principal Mr. Riegel, makes good rules and everybody obeys them.” So I said, “Give me an example.” And another answered, “You can’t climb on the pipes in the bathroom. We don’t climb on the pipes and the principal doesn’t either.”

This example is probably too simple to please a lot of people who want to make the topic of moral education difficult, but there is something profound in the answer of those children, something education should pay more attention to. You can’t expect children to take messages about rules or morality seriously unless they see adults taking those rules seriously in their day-to-day affairs. Certain must be said, certain limits lay down, and certain examples set. There is no other way.

We should also do a better job at curriculum selection. The research shows that most “values education” exercises and separate courses in “moral reasoning” tend not to affect children’s behavior; if anything, they may leave children morally adrift. Where to turn? I believe our literature and our history are a rich quarry of moral literacy. We should mine that quarry. Children should have at their disposal a stock of examples illustrating what we believe to be right and wrong, good and bad—examples illustrating what are morally right and wrong can indeed be known and that there is a difference.

What kind of stories, historical events, and famous lives am I talking about? If we want our children to know about honesty, we should teach them about Abe Lincoln walking three miles to return six cents and conversely, about Aesop’s shepherd boy who cried wolf if we want them to know about courage, we should teach them about Joan of Arc, Horatius at the bridge, and Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. If we want them to know about persistence in the face of adversity, they should know about the voyages of Columbus and the character of Washington during the Civil War. And our youngest should be told about the Little Engine That Could. If we want them to know about respect for the law, they should understand why Socrates told Crito: “No, I must submit to the decree of Athens.” If we want our children to respect the rights of others, they should read the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King, Jr.’ “Letter from Birmingham jail.” From the Bible they should know about Ruth’s loyalty to Naomi, Joseph’s forgiveness of his brothers, Jonathan’s friendship with David, the Good Samaritan’s kindness toward a stranger, and David’s cleverness and courage in facing Goliath.

These are only a few of the hundreds of examples we can call on. And we need not get into issues like nuclear war, abortion, creationism, or euthanasia. This may come as a disappointment to some people, but the fact is that the formation of character in young people is educationally a task different from, and prior to, the discussion of the great, difficult controversies of the day. First things come first. We should teach values the same way we teach other things: one step at a time. We should not use the fact that there are many difficult and controversial moral questions as an argument against basic instruction in the subject.

After all, we do not argue against teaching physics because laser physics is difficult, against teaching American history because there are heated disputes about the Founders’ intent. Every field has its complexities and its controversies. And every field has its basics, its fundamentals. So they are too with forming character and achieving moral literacy. As any parent knows, teaching character is a difficult task. But it is a crucial task, because we want our children to be healthy, happy, and successful but decent, strong, and good. None of this happens automatically; there is no genetic transmission of virtue. It takes the conscious, committed efforts of adults. It takes careful attention.

10. College Pressures

Mainly I try to remind that the road ahead is a long one and that it will have more unexpected turns than they think. There will be plenty of time to change jobs, change careers, change whole attitudes and approaches. They don not want to hear such liberating news. They want a map—right now – that they can follow unswervingly to career security, financial security, Social Security and, presumably, a prepaid grave.

What I wish for all students is some release from the clammy grip of the future. I wish them a chance to savor each segment of their education as an experience in itself and not as a grim preparation for the next step. I wish them the right to experiment, to trip and fall, to learn that defeat is as instructive as victory and is not the end of the world.

My wish, of course, is na?ve. One of the national gods venerated in our media—the million-dollar athlete, the wealthy executive—and glorified in our praise of possessions. In the presence of such a potent state religion, the young are growing up old.

I see four kinds of pressure working on college students today: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure. It is easy to look around for villains—to blame the colleges for charging too much money, the professors for assigning too much work, the parents for pushing their children too far, and the students for driving themselves too hard. But there are no villains: only victims.

“In the late 1960s.” one dean told me. “The typical question that I got from students was ‘Why is there so much suffering in the world’ or ‘how I can make a contribution?’ Today it’s ‘Do you think it would look better for getting into law school if I did a double major in history and political science, or just majored in one of them?’” many other deans confirmed this pattern. One said: “They are trying to find an edge—the intangible something that will look better on paper if two students are about equal.”

Note the emphasis on looking better. The transcript has become a sacred document, the passport to security. How one appears on paper is more important than how one appears in person. A is for Admirable and B is for Borderline, even though, in Yale’s official system of grading, A means “excellent” and B means “very good.” Today, looking very good is no longer good enough, especially for students who hope to go on to law school or medical school. They know that entrance into the better schools will be an entrance into the better law firms and better medical practices where they will make a lot of money. They also know that the odds are harsh. Yale Law School, for instance, matriculates 170students from an applicant pool of 3,700; Harvard enrolls 550 from a pool of 7,000.

It’s all very well for those of us who write letters of recommendation for our students to stress the qualities of humanity that will make them good lawyers or doctors. And it’s nice to think that admission officers are ready reading our letters and looking for the extra dimension of commitment or concern. Still, it would be hard for a student not to visualize these officers shuffling so many transcripts studded with As that they regard a B as positively shameful.

The pressure is almost as heavy on students who just want to graduate and get a job. Long gone are the days of the “gentleman’s C.” when students journeyed through college with a certain relaxation, sampling a wide variety of courses-music, art, philosophy, classics, anthropology, poetry, religion—that would send them out as liberally educated men and women. If I were an employer I would rather employ graduates who have this range and curiosity than those who narrowly pursued safe subjects and high grades. I know countless students whose inquiring minds exhilarate me. I like to hear the play of their ideas. I do not know if they are getting As or Cs, and I do not care. I also like them as people. The country needs them, and they will find satisfying jobs. I tell them to relax. They cannot.

Nor can I blame them. They live in a brutal economy. Tuition, room, and board at most private colleges now come to at least $7,000, not counting books and fees. This might seem to suggest that the colleges are getting rich. But they are equally battered by inflation. Tuition covers only 60 percent of what it costs to educate a student, and ordinarily the remainder comes from what college receives in endowments, grants, and gifts. Now, the remainder keeps being swallowed by the cruel costs—higher every year—of just opening the doors. Heating oil is up. Insurance is up. Postage is up. Health-premium costs are up. Everything is up. Deficits are up. We are witnessing in American the creation of a brotherhood of paupers—colleges, parents, and students, joined by the common bond of debt.

Today it is not unusual for a student, even if he works part time at college and full time during the summer, to accrue $5,000 in loans after four years—loans that he must start to repay within one year after graduation. Exhorted at commencement to go forth into the world, he is already behind as he goes forth. How could he not feel under pressure throughout college to prepare for this day of reckoning? I have used “he,” incidentally, only for brevity. Women at Yale are under no less pressure to justify their expensive education to themselves, their parents, and society. In fact, they are probably under more pressure. For although they leave college superbly equipped to bring fresh leadership to traditionally male jobs, society has not yet caught up with this fact.

Along with economic pressure goes parental pressure. Inevitably, the two are deeply intertwined.

I see many students taking pre-medical courses with joyless tenacity. They go off to their labs as if they were going to the dentist. It saddens me because I know tem in other corners of their life as cheerful people.

“Do you want to medical school?” I asked them.

“I guess so,” they say, without conviction, or “Not really.”

“Then why are you going?”

“Well, my parents want me to be a doctor. They are paying all this money and …”

Poor students, poor parents, they are caught in one of the oldest webs of love and duty and guilt. The parents mean will; they are trying to steer their sons and draughts toward a secure future. But the sons and daughter want to major in history or classics or philosophy—subjects with no “practical” value. Where’s the payoff on the humanities? It’s not easy to persuade such loving parents that the humanities do indeed pay off. The intellectual faculties developed by studying subjects like history and classics—an ability to synthesize and relate, to weigh cause and effect, to see events in perspective—are just the faculties that make creative leaders in business or almost any general field. Still, many fathers would rather put their money on courses that point toward specific profession—courses that are pre-law, pre-medical, pre-business, or, as I sometimes heard it put, “pre-rich.”

But the pressure on students is severe. They are truly torn. One part of them feels obliged to fulfill their parents’ expectations; after all, their parents are older and presumably wiser. Another part tells them that the expectations that are right for their parents are not right for them.

I know a student who wants to be an artist. She is very obviously an artist and will be a good one—she has already had several modest local exhibits. Meanwhile she is growing as a well-round person and taking humanistic subjects that will enrich the inner resources out of which her art will grow. But her father is strongly opposed. He thinks that an artist is a “dumb” thing to be. The student vacillates and tries to please everybody. She keeps up with her art somewhat furtively and takes some of the “dumb” courses her father wants her to take—at least they are dumb courses for her. She is a free spirit on a campus of tense students—no small achievement in it—and she deserves to follow her muse.

Peer pressure and self-induced pressure are also intertwined, and they begin almost at the beginning of freshman year.

“I had a freshman student I’ll call Linda,” one dean told me, “who came in and said she was under terrible pressure because her roommate, Barbara, was much brighter and studied all the time. I could not tell her that Barbara had come in two hours earlier to say the same thing about Linda.”

The story is almost funny—except that it is not. It is symptomatic of all the pressure put together. When every student thinks every other student is working harder and doing better, the only solution is to study harder still. I see students going off to the library every night after dinner and coming back when it closes at midnight. I wish they would sometimes forget about their peers and go to a movie. I hear the clacking of typewriters in the hours before dawn. I see the tension in their eyes when exams are approaching and papers are due: “Will I get everything done?”

Probably they won’t. They will get blocked. They will sleep. They will oversleep. They will bug out.

Part of the problem is that they are expected to do. A professor will assign five page papers. Several students will start writing ten page papers to impress him. Then more students will write ten page papers, and a few will raise the ante to fifteen. Pity the poor student who is still just doing the assignment.

“Once you have twenty or thirty percent of the student population deliberately overexerting,” one dean points out, “It’s bad for everybody. When a teacher gets more and more effort from his class, the student who is doing normal work can be perceived as not doing well. The tactic work, psychologically.”

Why cannot the professor just cut back and not accept longer papers? He can, and he probably will. But by then the term will be half over and the damage done. Grade fever is highly contagious and not easily reversed. Besides, the professor’s main concern is with his course. He knows his students only in relation to the course and does not know that they are also overexerting in their other courses. Nor is it really his business. He did not sign up for dealing with the student as a whole person and with all the emotional baggage the student brought along from home. That’s what deans, masters, chaplains, and psychiatrists are for.

To some extent this is nothing new: a certain number of professors have always been self-contained islands of scholarship and shyness, more comfortable with books than with people. But the new pauperism has widened the gap still further, for professors who actually like to spend time with students do not have as much time to spend. They are also overexerting. If they are young, they are busy trying to publish in order not to perish, hanging by their figure nails onto a shrinking profession.

If they are old and tenured, they are buried under the duties of administering departments—as departmental chairmen or members of committees—that have been thinned out by the budgetary axe.

Ultimately it will be the students’ own business to break the circles in which they are trapped. They are too young to be prisoners of their parents’ dreams and their classmates’ fears. They must be jolted into believing into themselves as unique men and women who have the power to shape their own future.

“Violence is being done to the undergraduate experience,” says Carlos Hortas. “College should be open-ended: at the end it should open many, many roads. Instead, students are choosing their goal in advance, and their choices narrow as they go along. It’s almost as if they think that the country has been codified in the type of jobs that exist-that they’ve got to fit into certain slots. Therefore, fit into the best paying slot.”

“They ought to take chances. Not taking chances will lead to life of colorless mediocrity. They’ll be comfortable. But something in the spirit will be missing.”

I have painted too drab a portrait of today’s students, making them seem a solemn lot. That is only half of their story; if they were so dreary I wouldn’t so thoroughly enjoy their company. The other half is that they are easy to like. They are quick to laugh and to offer friendship. They are not introverts. They are usually kind and are more considerate of one another than any student generation I have known.

Nor are they so obsessed with their studies that they avoid sports and extracurricular activities. On the contrary, they juggle their crowded hours to play on a variety of teams, perform with musical and dramatic groups, and write for campus publications. But this in turn is one more cause of anxiety. There are too many choices. Academically, they have 1,300 courses to select from; outside class they have to decide how much spare time they can spare and how to spend it.

This means that they engage in fewer extracurricular pursuits than their predecessors did. If they want to row on the crew and play in the symphony they will eliminate one; in the ‘60s they would have done both. They also tend to choose activities that are self-limiting. Drama, for instance, is flourishing in all twelve of Yale’s residential colleges, as it never has before. Students hurl themselves into these productions—as actors, directors, carpenters, and technicians—with a dedication to create the best possible play, knowing that the day will come when the run will end and they can get back to their studies.

They also cannot afford to be the willing slave of organizations like the Yale Daily News. Last spring at the one-hundredth anniversary banquet of that paper—who’s past chairmen include such once and future kings as Potter Stewart, Kingman Brewster, and William F. Buckley, Jr.—much was made of the fact that the editorial staff used to be small and totally committed and that “newsies” routinely worked fifty hours a week. In effect they belonged to a club; Newsies is how they defined themselves at Yale. Today’s students will one or two articles a week, when he can, and he defines himself as a student. I’ve never heard the word Newsie except at the banquet.

If I have described the modern undergraduate primarily as a driven creature who is largely ignoring the blithe spirit inside who keeps trying to come out and play, it’s because that’s where the crunch is, not only at Yale but throughout American education. It’s why I think we should all be worried about the values that are nurturing a generation so fearful of risk and so goal-obsessed at such an early age.

I tell students that there is no one “right” way to get ahead—that each of them is a different person, starting from a different point and bound for a different destination. I tell neither them that change is a tonic and that all the slots are not codified nor the frontiers closed. One of my ways of telling them is to invite men and women who have achieved success outside the academic world to come and talk informally with my students during the year. They are heads of companies or ad agencies, editors of magazines, politicians, public officials, television magnates, labor leaders, business executives, Broadway products, artists, writers, economists, photographers, scientists, historians—a mixed bag of achievers.

I asked them to say a few words about how they got started. The students assume that they started in their present profession and knew all along that it was what they wanted to do. Luckily for me, most of them got into their field by a circuitous route, to their surprise, after many detours. The students are startled. They can hardly conceive of a career that was not pre-planned. They can hardly imagine allowing the hand of God or chance to nudge them down some unforeseen trail.

11. To Err Is Wrong

In the summer of 1979, Boston Red Sox first baseman Carl Yastrzemski became the fifteenth player in baseball history to reach the three thousand hit plateaus. This event drew a lot of media attention, and for about a week prior to the attainment of this goal, hundreds of reports covered Yaz’s every more. Finally, one reporter asked, “Hey Yaz, aren’t you afraid all of this attention will go to your head?” Yastrzemski replied, “I look at this way: in my career I’ve been up to bat over ten thousand times. That means I’ve been unsuccessful at the plate over seven thousand times. That fact alone keeps me from getting a swollen head.”?

Most people consider success and failure as opposites, but they are actually both products of the same process. As Yaz suggest, an activity that produces a hit may also produce a miss. It is the same with creative thinking; the same energy that generates good creative ideas also produces errors.

Many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. Our educational system, based on “the right answer” belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools:

Right over 90% of the time = “A”

Right over 80% of the time = “B~”

Right over 70% of the time = “C~” Right over 60% of the time = “D~” Less than 60% correct, you fail.

From this we learn to be right as often as possible and to keep our mistakes to a minimum. We learn, in other words, that “to err is wrong.

Playing It Safe

With this kind of attitude, you aren’t going to be taking too many chances. If you learn that failing even a litter penalizes you (e.g., being wrong only 15% of the time garners you only a “B” performance), you learn not to make mistakes. And more important, you learn not to put yourself to situation where you might fall. This leads to conservative thought pattern designed to avoid the stigma our society puts on “failure”.

I have a friend who recently graduated from college with a Master’s degree in Journalism. For the last six month, she has been trying to find a job, but to no avail. I talked with her about situation, and realized that her problem is that she doesn’t know how to fail. She went through eighteen years of schooling to try any approaches where she might fail. She has been conditioned to believe that failure is bad in and of itself, rather than a potential stepping-stone to new ideas.

Look around. How many middle managers, housewives, administrators, teachers, and other people do you see who are to try anything new because of this failure? Most of us have learned not to make mistakes in public. As a result, we remove ourselves from many learning experience except for those occurring in the most private of circumstances.

Different Logic

From a practical point of view, “to err is wrong” makes sense. Our survival in the everyday world requires us to perform thousand of small tasks without failure. Think about it: you wouldn’t last very long if you were to step out in front of traffic or stick your hand a pot of boiling water. In addition, engineers whose bridges collapse, stock brokers who lose money for their clients, and copywriters whose ad campaigns decrease sales won’t keep their jobs very long.

Nevertheless, too great an adherence to the belief “to err is wrong” can greatly undermine your attempts to generate new ideas. If you are more concerned with producing right answers than generating original ideas, you’ll probably make uncritical use of the rules, formulae, and procedures used to obtain these right answers. By doing this, you’ll by-pass the germinal phase of the creative process, and thus spend litter time testing assumptions, challenging the rules, asking what-if questions, or just playing around with the problem. All of these techniques will produce some incorrect answers, but in the germinal phase errors are viewed as a necessary by-product of creative thinking. As Yaz would put it, “if you want the hits, be prepared for the misses.” That’s the way the game of life goes.

Errors as Stepping Stones

Whenever an error pops up, the usual response is “Jeez, another screw up, what went wrong this time?” the creative thinker, on the other hand, will realize the potential value of errors, and perhaps say something like, “Would you look at that! Where can it lead our thinking?” and then he or she will go on to use the error as a stepping stone to a new idea. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filed with people who used erroneous assumptions and failed ideas as stepping-stones to new ideas. Columbus thought he was finding a shorter route to India. Johannes Kepler stumbled on to the idea of interplanetary gravity because of assumptions that were right for the wrong reasons. And, Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.

The following story about the automotive genius Charles Kettering exemplifies the spirit of working through erroneous assumptions to good ideas. In 1912, when the automobile industry was just beginning to grow, Kettering was interested in improving gasoline engine efficiency. The problem he faced was“knockthe phenomenon in which gasoline takes too long to burn in the cylinder-thereby reducing efficiency.

Kettering began searching for ways to eliminate the “knock.” He thought to him, “How can I get the gasoline to combust in the cylinder at an earlier time?” the key concept here is “early”. Searching for analogous situations, he looked around for models of “things that happen early.” He thought of historical models, physical models, and biological models. Finally, he remembered a particular plant, the trailing arbutus, which “happens early,” i.e., it blooms in the snow (“earlier” than other plants). One of this plant’s chief characteristics is its’ red leaves, which help the plant retain light at certain wavelengths. Kettering figured that it must be the red color, which made the trailing arbutus bloom earlier.

Now came the critical step in Kettering’s chain of thought. He asked himself, “How can I make the gasoline red?” perhaps I’ll put red dye in the gasoline—maybe that’ll make it combust earlier.” He looked around his workshop, and found that he didn’t have any red dye. But he did happen to have some iodine—perhaps that would do. He added the iodine to the gasoline and, lo and behold, the engine didn’t “knock”.

[英语作文写作的需要背诵的部分

翻开历史的画卷，我们可以清楚地看到，古今中外的伟人名士，专家学者，他们成功的奥秘之一都是勤奋。

不是吗?我国著名的生物学家童第周，上中学时，他考试不及格，老师要让他留级，同学们笑他，他不悲观失望，从此发奋学习，最后取得了优异的成绩。出国留学时他又刻苦钻研，为中国争了光，成了世界著名的生物学家。还有连学都没上过的张海迪姐姐，身残志坚，勤奋学习，克服了健康人也难以克服的苦难，硬是攻克了几门外语。

古往今来，许多誉满全球的伟人，他们的每一项发明创造，每一次成功，都是要流下滴滴汗水，留下步步脚印的。他们的成功都是靠着自己的勤奋钻研而得来的。

成功的关键在于勤奋，勤能补拙是良训，一分辛劳一分才，只有勤奋才能取得成功。传说古希腊有一个叫德摩斯梯尼的演说家，因小时口吃，登台演讲时，声音含混，发音不准，常常被雄辩的对手压倒。可是他气不馁，心不灰，为克服这个弱点，战胜雄辩的对手，便每天口含石子面对大海朗诵，不管春夏秋冬，坚持五十年如一日，连爬山，跑步也边走边做演说，终于成为全希腊一个最有名气的演说家。这样的事例不正说明勤奋可以克服一切困难，战胜一切，从而取得成功吗?不是正告诉人们，一切事物都要勤奋吗?

鲁迅之所以渊博，正是因为他把别人喝咖啡的时间，都用来汲取精神养料。

李时珍的《本草纲目》的写成，正是由于他27个年头的跋山涉水，“访采四方”，“搜罗百代”的成果。

高尔基说过：“天才出于勤奋”。卡莱尔也说过：“天才就是无止境地刻苦勤奋的努力”。这些名人的经验之谈告诉我们，只有勤奋，才能成功

物理学家牛顿;化学界的大师诺贝尔、门捷列夫;放射性元素的发现者居里夫人……他们之所以有这样伟大的成就，有一个重要的因素，就是由于他们都是勤奋学习，不耻下问，大胆实践，用于向失败挑战的人。而最后呢，他们胜利了，成功了。无数事实证明了这样一个真理：成功来自勤奋。只会不是自然的恩赐，而是勤奋的结果。

让我们大家以此共勉，勇勤奋去攀登智慧的巅峰，用知识的钥匙打开成功的大门!让我们永远记住：成功来自勤奋。

Behind every great achievement in anyones life lies perseverance.We see this in every human endeavor.Outstanding sportsmen spend all their time practising.Their endurance is beyond imagination.

The same is true of businessmen who build up fortunes.What we usually see are their achievements, but once we go behind the scenes we will find that they have put in a lot of continual steady efforts.We all have read of great musicians, writers and inventors who have created or discovered breakthroughs in human achievement.Invariably they have said that they owe all their success to perseverance.As to college students, quite a big number of then, have become successful language learners through perseverance, however, a certain group of them, just stop half way and their previous efforts turn out to be fruitless.

Of all the countless examples the saga of Colonel Saunders is perhaps one of the most outstanding.The 65-year-old man from Kentucky had a dream to start a chain of fried chicken restaurants all over the world.To realize his dream, he knew that he needed a restaurant owner to go into partnership with him to open the first restaurant and to fry chicken according to the secret recipe he had.Colonel Saunders had knocked on 1008 doors before he finally found his partner.It is doubtful whether many of us would have had the perseverance to knock even a hundred doors.

From the above discussion we can draw a conclusion that success comes to anyone who keeps working perseveringly and lack of perseverance can only result in frustration and failure.

【努力与成功英语作文的翻译】

每个人的生活中的每一个伟大的成就背后都要有毅力.在每个努力的人中我们都可以看到这一点.优秀运动员把所有时间都花在练习上.他们的耐力是超乎想象的.

对于获取财富的商人也是相同的.我们通常看到的是他们的成就,但是,一旦我们走进幕后我们会发现他们已经付出了大量持续稳定的努力.我们都读过关于伟大的音乐家,作家和发明家的成就,他们都已经创建或发现突破.他们总是说他们所有的成功都归功于坚持坚持.相当大数量的大学生通过毅力已成为成功的语言学习者,然而,他们中的一些特定的人只是半途而废而他们之前的努力也就变成徒劳的.

无数的例子中,桑德斯上校的传奇例子也许是最优秀的.来自肯塔基州的这位65岁老人做了一个在世界各地开连锁炸鸡餐厅的梦.为了实现他的梦传,他知道他需要一个餐馆老板与他合作开第一家餐馆并且根据他的炸鸡秘方制作.在桑德斯上校终于找到他的合作伙伴时,他已经敲了1008次门了.毫无疑问的是我们中的许多人未必有毅力敲一百次门。

从上面的讨论中我们可以得出一个结论,成功只给那些一直坚定地工作的人而缺乏毅力只能导致挫折和失败.

[努力英语作文

保尔。柯察金是《钢铁是怎样炼成的》的主人公，是一名无产阶级战士。他曾当过童工，从小就在社会最底层饱受折磨和侮辱。后来在朱赫来的影响下，逐步走上革命道路。其后他经历了一系列的人生挑战，但无论战场上的搏杀，感情上的波折，还是工地上的磨炼，都没能使他倒下，反而使他更加坚强。即使在伤病无情地夺走他的健康，使他不得不卧在病榻上时，他仍然不向命运屈服，而是克服种种困难，拿起笔以顽强的毅力进行写作，以另一种方式实践着他生命的誓言。

飞人刘翔，是110米跨栏冠军。可是想成为冠军，哪有这么容易啊?一开始，他还小，训练的艰苦无法让人想象，但他坚持了下来。尽管辛苦，困难重重，但他总是做到最好。在2004年的雅典奥运会中，刘翔以1288的好成绩获得冠军并打破了纪录，也为我们中国赢得了一面金牌。可是在2008年的奥运会上，刘翔由于腿伤，未能参加比赛，尽管这样，中国人都能谅解他，相信再经过4年的努力，在英国的奥运会上，刘翔定能以优异的成绩为中国赢得金牌。

王羲之是我国著名的书法家。他曾经一天写成千上万个字，一天能把一缸子的清水都变成黑色。还记得有一次，他废寝忘食连吃饭都不记得，桌边上放着一盘热乎乎的馒头，已变得冷冰冰的。他便拿起一个冷冰冰的馒头往那墨汁上面蘸了蘸，然后津津有味地吃着。他忘我的精神使他成为了举世闻名的书法家。

我在小学学习排球，一开始觉得太苦了，整天打到5点多才能回家，出校门肯定是最后一个了。回家后的第一件事就是看自已的手，那只手是紫色的还透着青。晚上睡觉也睡不塌实，一双手放在哪儿都疼。所以我就产生了放弃的念头，然而在老师的鼓励下我又坚持了下来，我反复对自已说：“再也不能放弃，一定要坚持下去。”就这样，我坚持到最后，并且在比赛中获得了良好的成绩。

不经历风雨，怎能见彩虹呢?成功都是要靠自已的努力得来的。愿我们用辛勤的劳动，换来沉甸甸的果实。成功需要磨炼。

一些有成就的人，都是勤奋者，勤奋是成才必要条件。

天才其实就是包括几点，一、要有卓越的创造力;二、要有想象力;三、还要有一个突出的聪明智慧。具有这些物质的人大部分都是天才。

勤奋就是要不懈的努力，和后天形成的习惯与培养，与自己一如既往的追求。理想有着密切相关的。

许多科学家在成材的过程中身居恶劣的环境下，但他们勇于克服困难，终于取得了伟大的成就。

马克思说过：“在科学的到路上没有平坦的大到可走，只有不谓劳苦在崎岖小路上攀登的人，才有希望达到光辉的顶点。”他本人为了写《资本论》，就曾经花费了45年的时间，勤奋学习要收集资料。

坚持不懈的劳动，自然是“苦”事，但他们功的必由之路。高尔基说过：“天才就是劳动，人的天赋就像火花，它即可以熄灭，也可以旺盛的燃烧起来，而是它门成为熊熊烈火的方法，那就是劳动。”劳动在劳动就是勤奋，勤奋是产生天才的根本原因。

勤奋有为，赖情无知博学多来源于勤奋忘我的劳动，只要我们在学习上花上舍的花一点力气用功夫，就必定能够用辛勤劳动的汗水和智慧浇开放香的理想只花，获得真才实学。

苏联著名作家高尔基曾经说过：“天才出自勤奋。”一个人只有不断努力，刻苦学习，才能取得成绩。

我国青年数学家陈景润为了摘取“皇冠上的明珠”，解决“哥德巴赫猜想”，坚持每天凌晨3点起床学外语，同时每天去图书室，沉浸在数学符号的海洋之中。有3天中午，管理员临走时曾大声喊叫，问里面是否还有人，但全神贯注看书的陈景润啥也没有听见，于是他被反锁在里面。后来他望着那紧锁的大门，毫不在意的微笑了一下，不觉饥饿，不知疲倦的重又回到书堆中。

陈景润同志正是由于这种勤奋，摘取了“皇冠上的明珠”，成为著名的数学家。

可是，也有少数人天资聪颖，但因为不努力，他的成绩、才智却一落千丈。

据《青年博览》刊载，少年大学生钱某，12岁就会微积分，被认为神童。进了安徽科技大学，他不参加学校统一安排的高中文化补习班，却只身到图书馆看他的微积分，一个月就声称已学完。平时，学生们去上课，他却在校园里野逛，成绩很快一落千丈。无奈，老师只得让他休学。休学一年，上学后一个时期故态复萌，他狂妄的认为在大学里学不到什么，经常拿气枪在校园里“巡猎”。最后学校只得让他退学。退学后当上了油漆工，从此钱某结束了“神童”的生涯。

从上面的两个事例我们可以看出“天才是万分之一的灵感，百分之九十九的汗水。”

“勤能补拙是良训，一分辛苦一分才。”只有勤奋、上进，才会取得成绩。但是勤奋并不等于蛮干，也要讲求方法，只有方法适当，才能成功。因此，我们在以后的学习中，都应该勤奋、努力，这样才会取得好的成绩!

There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?

范文：

It is true that a rich variety of musical styles can be found around the world. Music is a vital part of all human cultures for a range of reasons, and I would argue that traditional music is more important than modern, international music.

Music is something that accompanies all of us throughout our lives. As children, we are taught songs by our parents and teachers as a means of learning language, or simply as a form of enjoyment. Children delight in singing with others, and it would appear that the act of singing in a group creates a connection between participants, regardless of their age. Later in life, people’s musical preferences develop, and we come to see our favourite songs as part of our life stories. Music both expresses and arouses emotions in a way that words alone cannot. In short, it is difficult to imagine life without it.

In my opinion, traditional music should be valued over the international music that has become so popular. International pop music is often catchy and fun, but it is essentially a commercial product that is marketed and sold by business people. Traditional music, by contrast, expresses the culture, customs and history of a country. Traditional styles, such as ...(example)..., connect us to the past and form part of our cultural identity. It would be a real pity if pop music became so predominant that these national styles disappeared.

In conclusion, music is a necessary part of human existence, and I believe that traditional music should be given more importance than international music.

[我们为什么需要音乐英语作文

一次，陆文夫老师在回答一位学生关于“一举成名”问题时，说：“举动运动运一举可以打破记录，但谁知道，在此之前，他举过多少举。”由此可以看出，勤奋是成功的基础，成功离不开勤奋。

古今中外，曾涌出现多少成功人士，虽然他们中有的人具有生理缺陷，但依靠勤奋，他们成就了梦想。

传说古希腊有个叫德摩斯梯尼得人，他热爱演讲。但他患有口吃，声音含混，吐字不清，不适合演讲。可是他并不气馁，不灰心每天跑步，练肺活量，口含石子讲话，克卷舌。无论春夏，都有他勤奋的身影，最终，他战胜了雄辩的对手，成为全希腊最有名的演说家。德摩斯梯尼虽然并不擅长演说，甚至无缘演讲，但它并不接受命运的安排，通过勤奋刻苦改变了自己，证明了“勤能补拙”

我国古代有个叫陈正义的人，思维不活跃，反应迟钝，效率很慢，每天读书只能读50个字，一二百遍才可以读完一篇小文章，但他不懈怠，付出比别人多几倍的时间读书，勤奋苦练，日积月累，最终成了博学之士。这也表明，无论天资如何，即使被贴上“弱智”标签的人，只要勤，便能化拙为巧，化腐巧为神奇。

再如，我国当代数学家陈景润，潜心研究数学，不断攀登高峰，翻阅的资料不下千本，坚持不解，刻苦勤勉，终于取得了震惊世界的成就，这更体现了勤的高成次，精益求精，成功之后的勤时更值得赞扬的，只要勤奋的看书学习，便可以充实自己，弥补不足。

鲁迅曾经说过：时间就像海绵里的水，只要肯去挤，总会有的。勤奋的人懂得抓紧时间，利用时间来学习，从而达到更好的效果。

由此可见，勤是成功的前提，有了勤，才能弥补自身的不足，才能排除万难实现愿望。“一勤天下无难事”，勤起来吧，克服困难，勇于攀登，实现梦想，开凿智慧，勤起来吧，胜利不远了。

“梅花香自苦寒来”，漫天雪舞，周天寒彻，一树梅花迎风而立，含苞待放，几缕幽香已经迫不及待的飘逸而出，似有若无，惹人驻足。人们不知，正是这样严酷的寒冷逼迫，才使得梅花怒放枝头。树犹如此，人更是这样，前程似锦是外部环境和自我内心所逼的结果。

她，一个脆弱的生命，被世界遗弃，做上帝的弃儿，集聋哑盲于一身，内心肯定不是滋味，她痛苦，她挣扎，她曾经一度放弃，在消沉中度日，如同没有方向的船只，随波逐流，载沉载浮。直到有一天，生命中的第一缕曙光出现，温暖了她早已冰封的心。她的父母只为她提供了生活的需要，而她的老师却教给她知识，让她用独特的语言描绘那美丽的世界，她才发现这个世界竟然是那么美好。通过不懈的努力，她成了美国19世纪著名的作家、教育家、慈善家、社会活动家。是无数的苦难最终化为诸多的光环，上帝折断了她双翼，结果逼迫让她为自己重新插上翅膀再次飞翔。

时至今日，大千世界日新月异，外面的世界的确很精彩，但外面的世界真的很无奈，它逼着我们每一个人都不能躺在时间的温床上尽情享受，而是必须不断学习，不断超越。社会不容许我们整天浑浑噩噩的生活，故此学校把我们逼得很紧，早上起的比鸡早，晚上睡得比狗晚，但在这样的环境中，如果我们自己不逼自己，自己不改变自己，外界的逼迫再强大也也会无济于事，鸡蛋从内部打破是生命，而从外界打破只能成为他人桌上的一道菜。

故此，在强大的外压下，自己对自己的内压就显得格外重要。也许，我们都被上帝抛弃过，每个人都是一个被上帝咬过一口的苹果。或许我们曾臣服于命运的安排，在痛苦中挣扎。但是我们凭什么抛弃自己，妄自菲薄呢？别忘了我们是人，我们是高等动物，我们为何不努一下力呢，努力到无能为力，拼搏到感动自己，这样，你一定能够为自己逼出个似锦前程。

当然，机会是给有准备的大脑预备的，成功的奠基往往是充满了血和泪的交织。我们要想成功，就得逼自己不断上进，蝴蝶的翩翩起舞是美丽的，然而破茧成蝶的过程一定是痛苦的，我们渴望成功却不想努力，这可能吗？不可能，那你还不赶快努力，你还在等什么呢？

多逼一下自己吧！敢于和优秀的人竞争，向他们坦率的提出挑战，争分夺秒，脚踏实地，不负青春好时光，使自己的知识更丰富，思想更深刻，行为更儒雅。你也许最终成不了名人，但你却在奋斗中体验到了快乐——逆水行舟的感觉，逆风飞行的快乐！

叶落后，是归根；梦醒时，是孤灯。往事如烟，却美好如星，星星如梦，繁花浅淡，去逼一下自己吧，定能逼出个前程似锦。

说到勤奋，许多人只会付之一笑，他们认为勤奋是没有必要的，那他们就大错特错了。凿壁偷光、囊萤映雪、悬梁刺股，这些耳熟能详的故事无不告诉我们：勤奋，才是通往成功的唯一道路。

“书山有路勤为径，学海无涯苦作舟”。勤奋，又岂是说说而已？成功需要我们付出极大的努力，面对极多的困难，解决极难的问题。在那之后，成功自然会悄悄地到来。如果没有，那只是勤奋不够罢了。

智慧源于勤奋，伟大出自平凡。成功需要我们持之以恒。东晋大书法家王羲之，为了练好书法，每天都要求自己练字，练完后就在家旁的一口池塘里洗毛笔。就这样日复一日，竟将整口池塘染成了黑色。正是因为王羲之的坚持与勤奋，他才被人们称为“书圣”，名扬千古。

成功不仅要求我们坚持不懈，而且需要我们不怕困难，勇往直前。大数学家华罗庚曾说过：“聪明出自勤奋，天才在于积累。”而华罗庚本身也是一个十分勤奋的人。华罗庚从小家境贫困，初中毕业不久就在一家杂货店当学徒，但他酷爱数学，勤奋不怠：柜台旁，能看到他时常研读数学书籍；半夜里，能看到他挑灯思考的身影……十九岁时，华罗庚到一所学校去当会计，他变得更忙碌了，但他并没有因此中断钻研数学，熬夜是常有的事……经过不懈的努力，他最终成为了举世闻名的数学家。华罗庚用行动告诉我们：面对困难时，只有不断地努力，勤奋地学习，才能取得成功。

正如达·芬奇所说：“勤劳一日，可得一夜安眠；勤劳一生，可得幸福长眠。”从中我们可以知道勤奋对于成功的重要。而有的人却因懒惰断送了自己的前程。宋代，有一位天才，名为方仲永，从小便展现出天才的天赋。人们也很赞赏他，常常邀请他和他的父亲到家中做客，让他题诗，并留下他们吃饭。他的父亲十分贪心天天带着仲永到处吃喝，对方仲永的学业漠不关心，而方仲永本身也不是一个勤奋的人，便不怎学习。很快，他就变得“泯然众人矣”了，再也看不见一点儿当初神童的影子。可见，一个人纵使有惊人的天赋和聪明的头脑，如果不勤奋，也就不会有所成就。

只有握紧勤奋的钥匙，才能打开成功之门。让我们播种勤奋的种子，期待成功之花开放吧！

当我们看到运动员们在赛场上的矫健身影，特别是看到他们在奥运会上取得金牌，为国争光的情景，非常羡慕、敬佩他们。

那么他们成功的秘诀是什么呢？伟大的发明家爱迪生曾经说过，天才是百分之九十九的汗水加百分之一的灵感。这里的汗水就是勤奋。文章所介绍的运动员中我最敬佩的要数邓亚萍大姐姐了。她的身高只有150厘米，打乒乓球虽然拿了很多全国第一，但很多人并不看好她，进不了国家队。邓亚萍姐姐很不服气，无论严寒酷暑，她都夜以继日刻苦训练。台上一分钟，台下十年功，终于打败了世界冠军，如愿进入了国家队。这个曾不被内行看好的女孩，在世界乒台创造了一个不可战胜的神话，共得过4枚奥运金牌，14枚世界镜标赛金牌，连续8年世界女乒排名第一，创造了一个“邓亚萍时代”。辉煌成绩的背后，需要付出比别人多出十倍甚至百倍的努力和汗水，她舍得付出，所以它成功了。

回想自己看到表弟十指像蝴蝶一样在钢琴键盘上飞舞，从他的指缝间流出优美的旋律，我就萌生了要学钢琴的念头。刚开始兴趣很浓，信心很足，随着时间的推移，曲子难度的提高，我的热情一下子降到了冰点……是邓亚萍姐姐的精神鼓舞了我，寒假中我重操琴键，认认真真练习了起来。

邓亚萍姐姐的勤奋不仅仅表现在乒乓球赛场上，她退役后去清华大学学习，当时连26个字母都认不全，却硬是在短短的几年里补上了差距，成为清华优秀的毕业生。英语老师曾对我说：“顾及，你化在英语上的功夫实在太少了。”是啊，我不听磁带、不记单词，不下功夫，成绩能提高吗？无论在学习上、在生活中邓亚萍姐姐都是我学习的榜样。“勤奋是成功的基础”，只有打牢这个基础，我们才能获得成功，实现远大理想。这就是奥运给我的启示吧！

大家好!你们猜猜我是谁?先给你们一点提示吧，我不是文具，也不是动物。你们猜不着吧，还是我来告诉你们，我是中华民族传统美德之一---勤奋。

你们还记得韩愈曾说过“业精于勤，而荒于嬉”。我是实现梦想地必经之路，卓越地成绩往往和我是离不开的。一份辛劳一份收获，越勤奋越刻苦就越靠近成功。如果一个人懒惰，那么只有一个结果---失败。

同学们，你们知道我为什么叫“勤奋”吗?因为我是一种高尚的品德，每个人都拥有我，可你们不知道怎样充分的利用我，我希望同学们都能做一个勤奋的人。在困难面前不沮丧，不轻易放弃，相信成功总在辛勤的劳动后。

希望你们能通过我谱写出人生最美好的乐章，也希望你们的明天会更好。

我爱上了一本书—— 《爱迪生》。读这本书，我们学校在脸上，天空在心里，越读越有意思

爱迪生只上过三个月学。在他的人生道路上，他在徘徊，在煎熬，在无数次令人沮丧的失败中，但他热爱科学，一步一步向前。

爱迪生在每个实验中夜以继日地工作。饿了就随便吃，困得睁不开眼就趴在桌子上打个盹。不知多少个不眠之夜，多少个艰难的日子，他终于到达了成功的彼岸。

成功靠勤奋。这是我读书最大的收获。记得有一次，我考语文。平时应该很好，经常99，98分，所以考前没看书，以为能考个好成绩。结果我考了76分。从那以后，我下定决心要认真对待学习，绝不马虎。我利用业余时间认真复习功课，真的取得了不错的成绩！由此，我真正体会到，成功不易，靠的是人的毅力和勤奋。对自己有信心。

看着爱迪生的画像，不禁想起他的名言：“天才是99%的汗水和1%的灵感。”虽然在大家眼里我很有灵感，但是我要努力。

英国作家狄更斯有句至理名言：顽强的毅力可以征服世界上任何一座高峰。此言虽有些许夸张，但细细想来，也不无道理。

古往今来，凡是成就丰功伟绩之人，无一不具有顽强的毅力。

越王勾践卧薪尝胆的故事大家都耳熟能详。试想一下，一国之君，先是貂裘锦袍、花天酒地，忽然成为阶下囚，独居陋室舔舐苦胆，这一切，没有坚持不懈的毅力是不可能做到的。如果没有顽强的毅力，不能持之以恒的励精图治，就不会有十年后“三千越甲可吞吴”的壮观一幕。毅力，是成功的保证。

相反，没有毅力的人终会碌碌无为。我有一位朋友，她兴趣十分广泛，爱好弹琴，画画，跳舞，但是缺乏毅力，无论干什么事也都不能坚持到底，三天打鱼两天晒网。到头来，只应了“老大徒伤悲”那句话。

身处逆境的人没有惊人的毅力又怎能战胜困难走向成功?

我们每个人都渴望成功。走向成功的路布满荆棘，坎坷不平。缺乏毅力的人一辈子也无法走到尽头，眺望成功的曙光。只有毅力顽强的人方可到达成功的彼岸。

《钢铁是怎样炼成的》一书中的主人公保尔一生历尽磨难，然而，他始终不曾言败。他凭借顽强的毅力，钢铁般的身躯同资产阶级斗争，同肆虐的病魔抗衡。他以自己不屈服的信念和非凡的毅力向困难宣战。他使无数有志青年迸发出积极的力量。一个生命竟如此厚重，历史的沧桑无法掩盖他的光辉，时间的久远难以抹平他的顽强毅力。他的事迹再次向世人证明了毅力是成功的保证。

正如狄更斯所言，顽强的毅力可以征服世界上任何一座高峰。

关于成功的建议 Some Advices about Success

I have some good advice for your work. If you can do the following things， you will succeed in doing everything.

我对你的工作有一些好的建议。如果你能做到以下的几点，你做什么事情都会成功。

Firstly， whatever you do， you must be punctual and hard-working. If you sow a good seed， you will get a good harvest. If the seed is in poor quality， the harvest will also be very bad. And if you sow nothing， you will get nothing at all. Nothing.

首先，无论你做什么，你必须要守时和勤奋。如果你种下良好的种子，你会有一个好的收获。如果种子的质量不好，收获也将会是不乐观的。如果你没有耕耘，你将什么都得不到。什么都没有。

Secondly， you must be honest. As honesty is the moral tuition that everyone should have. If you treat other people friendly and sincerely， others will also respect you.

其次，你必须诚实。因为诚信是每个人都应该有的道德教育。如果你对其他人友好、真诚，别人也会尊重你。

Thirdly， you must be tolerant to others， since no one is perfect in the world. Everyone has his own faults， but if you can see everything on other persons perspective， there will be no problem at all.

第三，你必须对别人宽容，因为在这个世界上没有人是完美的。每个人都有他自己的缺点，但如果你能换位思考，什么问题都不会有。

Whats more， when you are in a big company， you should not only respect the leaders， but also get on well with the colleagues. Sometimes， you should try to please your boss， so that you could have more chances to be promoted.

更重要的是，当你在一家大公司里面时，你不仅要尊重领导，也要与同事相处好。有时，你应该取悦你的老板，这样你就可以有更多晋升的机会。

Last but not the least， dont ignore the little things， because such a little thing will have a great effect on your life. So you should start yourselves at the bottom， in order to get enough working experience. As you have enough working experience， nothing you will be afraid.

最后但并非最不重要的，不可忽视小事，因为这样的小事对你的生活也会有很大的影响。所以为了获得足够的工作经验，你应该从基层做起。当你有足够的工作经验时，你就什么都不会害怕了。

坚持，让小溪投入海的怀抱;坚持，让毛毛虫破蛹成蝶;坚持，让平凡的人成功。但坚持又是何等的不易，我就有那么一次亲身经历。 Persevere, let the stream enter the embrace of the sea; persist, let the caterpillar break into butterfly; persist and make ordinary people succeed.But it is not easy to persist, and I have such a personal experience.

那是一个假期，我和妈妈一起去爬山。在山脚下，我边望着看不到顶的山路，边和妈妈说：“妈妈，我这次要爬到山顶!”妈妈笑着说：“好，妈妈陪你一起，你可别爬到半路就放弃了。”“怎么可能?”我说到，心中也开始暗暗为自己鼓气。

在爬前几段台阶时，我一点也不累，分分钟就到了平台上，还时不时地回头催促妈妈走快点。等到妈妈走到我身边，我又立刻拉着妈妈继续向上爬。

走着走着，快到一半时，我的速度开始下降，微微有一些喘，双腿也有些酸了，但我没有在意这些，仍然向处前进。渐渐地，我的腿越来越酸痛，开始大口大口地喘气，脸也开始变得红润起来。越往上走，我的腿越像是灌了铅一般的沉重，喘气时胸开始大起大落，步伐也慢了许多，心中萌生了想要放弃的念想。

就在这时，妈妈对我说：“怎么了?走啊!你不是要爬上山顶吗?”我心想：对啊!我的目标可是山顶，怎能在这里半途而废呢?于是，我坚定了信念，迈着那沉重的脚步继续一步一步向上爬，终于登上了山顶。我呼吸着山顶清新的空气，放眼望去，山下一切尽收眼里，真有一种“一览众山小”的感觉啊!身上的疲惫感觉一下就释放出来，全身轻松，心胸顿时开阔起来。

我想人生之路不也正和这爬山之路一样，刚开始总是很轻松，但越往后越觉得困难，甚至会充满挫折和历险。那些半途放弃的人，不会看到山顶的风景，因而成为失败者;而那些一路坚持的人，最终会看到山顶迷人的风光，成为人生的胜利者。

坚持就是胜利。 这种话听多了，就麻木了，也就认识不到坚持的意义了，导致推动坚持的执着的心也渐渐隐去了，于是社会上许许多多人就怕执着，怕坚持，只愿干小事，不愿干时间稍长一点的事。那么，不着急，从现在起点燃你执着的心，让执着之心再次涌动。

成功的法则是执着，成功的人大多都是坚持下来的。诺贝尔经过500多次试验才制造出炸药，如果没有一颗执着的心，他是绝不会成功的。由此可见，点燃执着的心是多么必要。着名化学家拉瓦锡当年几乎就推翻了错误的 燃素学说 ，却由于舆论的指责而放弃坚持，多么可惜!

执着首先要坚持，要对自己充满信心。那些半途而废，做事 三天打鱼，两天晒网 的人，不去自己点燃执着的心，他当然只能与成功失之交臂。苏格拉底曾对自己的学生说： 把你们的手向前平举十分钟，每天都这么做。 一个月后，苏格拉底问自己的学生有多少人做到时，有三分之一的人举手，两个月后还剩十几个人，三个月后只剩一个人，他就是柏拉图，后来成为着名哲学家。只有点燃执着的心，才能成功，才会成功。

不要轻易说放弃，这也是执着的一个重要内容。如果轻易放弃，可能把到手的财富给放弃。一个美国人买下一块田来开采石油，挖了几十米仍没有石油，他就放弃了，坚持不下去了，于是把这块地低价卖给了另一个美国人，这个美国人在原来的基础上又向下挖了5米，终于发现了石油，他就是 石油大王 亨利，而原来那人却懊悔不已。

执着不是固执己见，但丁的 走自己的路让别人说去吧 ，过于以自我为中心了，适当地听取别人的意见对自己也会大有裨益。

执着是金，坚持是银，只有坚持才能成功点燃你执着的心。只有这样，才可能不人云亦云，不随波逐流。只有这样，才可能登上顺风船，驶上成功的彼岸。那句已经听得麻木的话再加上半句也许更好，那就是： 坚持就是胜利，执着才会成功。

There is no doubt that we all want to be successful. But what’s the main

concern of the way to success? From Abraham Lincoln’s famous remark, “Give me

six hours to chop down a tree, and I will spend the first four sharpening the

axe”, I learn that if we want to achieve success, we must make full preparation

for it.

Only if we are well prepared, can we catch the opportunity which occurs

once in a while. In our daily life, we have to expand our horizon and lay a

solid foundation for success. It will be a long way to be successful thus we

have to accumulate our knowledge day by day. And we can’t achieve success in one

or two days. It will help us solve problems more efficiently if we have a broad

horizon. What’s more, opportunities always occur out of our expectation so we

have to make ourselves well prepared. If we prepared, we will catch up with it

whenever it comes up.

Opportunities give priorities to the people who make preparation for them.

What’s more, success goes along with opportunities. We should develop the

ability to solve problems in different and efficient ways therefore we can make

our way to success more easily.

假如记忆可以移植，我现在就可能伏在书案上续写着曹雪芹的旷世奇书——《红楼梦》;假如记忆可以移植，我现在就可能站在讲坛上，继续着大文豪郭沫若的慷慨陈词;假如记忆可以移植，我现在就可能正在中南海，继续着周总理辛勤的工作;假如记忆可以移植，我现在就可能坐在实验室里，继续着居里夫人的研究……

想到这里，我不禁飘飘然，然而也戚戚然，飘然于终有一天学子们终不必12年苦读高考一锤定终身;“戚然”于毕竟我没有赶上——生不逢时啊!

然而三思之后，我发现自己的“飘然”，未免来的太早。拥有曹雪芹的文思，并不代表拥有他“举家食粥酒常赊”悲惨境遇下的坚贞不屈;拥有郭沫若的渊博并不代表拥有他杰出的文学天赋;拥有周总理的经验并不意味着拥有他一颗热爱祖国热爱人民的心;拥有居里夫人的知识，并不意味着拥有她顽强的工作毅力。所以，即使拥有了先贤们的记忆，也并不能使先贤在今世重现，不一定能用我们的血肉去延续他们生命，继续他们的事业。

因为成功者所需要的不仅仅是广博的知识，丰富的经验，更重要的是一种崇高的意志品质。如果缺少这种可贵的意志品质，我们充其量只能作考场上的胜利者——何况这种胜利也是不会长久的。因为成功的奠基石，是毅力，是对自己的事业的不断追求、不断完善的一颗心!没有了这颗心，科学家不会进取，文学家不会再创造，领导者也不会呕心沥血全心全意地为人民服务了。

因此我不再因自己的想入非非而“飘然”、而“戚然”，无论何时何地的学子，无论有何种高科技的手段，也无论我们的头脑里“库存”有多少，没有对事业不断追求的精神，我们都将一事无成!所以，12年的苦读，考场上的拼搏，为的是让我们拥有成就事业的毅力和迈向成功的勇气。

相信若干年后，学子们依旧在这样苦读，因为人人清楚：栋梁之材应具备的不仅仅是移植来的记忆

成功没有捷径，唯一的途径只有坚持，坚持就是成功，成功在于坚持。哪怕路途遥不可及，只要你踏破铁鞋，一定会取得成功。

今天就是见证坚持的时刻!我们满怀激动之心，一同向着下城区青少年发展中心前进!刚步入校门，映入眼帘的便是一座神秘而又普通的教学楼。这时，同学们兴奋不已，蜂拥而上，整个教室一片欢腾。刚坐下，我就恨不得马上打开工具箱看看葫芦里到底卖得是什么药，但我还是抑压住满心的兴奋，听“四眼”老师慢条斯理地娓娓道来，讲述着零件的类型以及拼装方法。一动手，我们便兴致盎然，出了一些小漏洞，幸好有“四眼”老师指点，不然非成热锅上的蚂蚁不可。接着，学了些简单的编程，以便于控制我们的“智能赛车”。

下午，“四眼”老师让我们继续改装“智能赛车”，于是，“智能赛车”的尾部装了许多防卫系统，上面加了几个超聚能的“加农炮”攻防兼备，简直帅极了。前几个任务我还能勉强通过，可最后一个挑战任务实在太困难了,当时本能反应就是愣了一下。心想：根本控制不好转弯和直行的时间与角度，看来要花大功夫了。当时，我真有点想放弃了，但心中总有一点微弱的希望之火在不断鼓励我，“坚持就是胜利!”于是我振作起来与拍档在场地上来回试验，一而再，再而三……时间一秒一秒过去了,我们已经试了十多次,但还是以失败告终.我不胜其烦,觉得过程太复杂了,还是放弃吧.拍档似乎看透了我的心思,对我说:“不要被困难打倒。”我想起了老师与父母的教导，起身对拍档说“加油，不能向困难屈服!”经过我们周密的计算与大胆的猜想以及拍档巧妙的动手能力，终于在最后5分钟完成了终极“悬崖勒马”任务。

这就是坚持的力量，神圣而又强大，虽然过程是极其艰难，但即使成功再怎么遥不可及，远不可达，在坚持面前总是那么微不足道，成功在于坚持。

你在一生中，可以有所作为的时候只有一次。那就是现在，然而，许多人却在悔恨过去和担忧未来之中浪费了大好时光。

一个人要知道自己的位置，就像一个人知道自己的脸面一样，这是最为清醒的自觉。洗尽铅华总是比随意的涂脂抹粉来得美。所以做能做的事，把它做的最好，这才是做人的重要。

你最痛苦的时候，窗外有小鸟在快乐地歌唱；

你最快乐的时候，有人正受着病魔的折磨，和死亡搏斗，挣扎。

世界总是一样的，只是我们的心情和遭遇不一样而已。

每一个人都期待着一份至死不渝的感情。但要明白，感情如房子，建造时偷工减料就会成危楼；年久失修莫名其妙就会长出壁癌，有时因原来施工不良就会漏水；有时一场一大台风会吹破玻璃；有时也可能遇上地震来摧残。如果没有放火逃生设备也不小以应变。。。。。。还有所有的房子都一样，即使是监狱，也有一扇可以进出的门。

人生里面总是有所缺少，你得到什么，也就失去什么，重要的是你应该知道自己到底要什么。追两只兔子的人，难免会一无所获。

人生没有十全十美，如果你发现错了。重新再来，别人不原谅你，你可以自己原谅自己。千万不要用一个错误去掩盖另一个错误。

人活着的意义应当是在过程，而不是结论。所以一个人不应该以自己的经验和观点去影响另一个人，何况他不是你，你也不是他。每一个人成长的过程都不一样，人生的酸甜苦辣应当自己尝一尝，尝试才是人生。

财富是一种寄存，钱再多，你也不能带到棺材里去；

情爱是一种寄存，人之亡之，情之焉附？

权位是一种寄存，无论你怎样叱咤风云，却不能逃出最终的交替；

即使是生命本身，也不过是寄存于这个星球上的匆匆过客。而这个星球，本身充其量也就是造物主为人类建造的一间小驿站。

我们的人生何曾不充满梦想，那朵朱槿花儿，就在你我的心灵深处摇摆，那无限的风光我们几欲搅尽。然而我们总是习惯于守侯第一个春天，而对第一个季节的空获，我们往往轻率地将第二个春天弃之门外，将梦交归于梦。梦想之花垂青的只是那些有耐心，持着追求的人。今天，倘若给你一朵梦中的朱槿花，你应该有勇 气向梦想买断第二个春天。

其实，感动发生在刹那之间。感动也可能永恒，一点宽容可能会让别人感激一生；一点爱心可能会让别人温暖一生；一句祝福与鼓励的话语可能会让幸福一生。

一个人只有时刻保持幸福快乐的感觉，才会使自己更加热爱生命，热爱生活。只有快乐，愉快的心情，才是创造力和人生动力的源泉；只有不断自己创造快乐，与自己快乐相处的人，才能远离痛苦与烦恼，才能拥有快乐的人生。

如果你想成功，那么你要记住：遗产为零，诚实第一，学习第二，礼貌第三，刻苦第四，精明第五。

完整的人生应有“三感”，使命感，失落感，危机感。

每个企业家都有自己的特色和风格，但他们还有共同的特征，那就是：有正确的判断力，有决心，敢于创新，勤奋工作。

做人的唯一指南就是自己的良心，回首往事。惟一使人感到蔚籍的是自己行为的正直与诚实，生活中要是没有这种慰籍是非常不明智的。因为人常为自己的破灭与筹算的错误而自嘲；然而这种慰籍，无论命运对你任何，你总能以坚定的步伐前进，而且充满荣誉感。

我们每一个人都应该有更多的同情，更多的爱，比维持我们生存需要的多得多，我们应该把它分散给别人，追求是生命之光。

[成功需要用心感悟作文