瓦尔登湖读后感英文（优秀20篇）

初读《瓦尔登湖》是因为海子喜欢这本书，可是当时稚气尚存的我看不懂书中枯燥晦涩的典故。随着时间的流逝，阅历的增加，我再次捧起此书细致浏览，才略懂其中的些许真谛。

本书是一八四五到一八四七年梭罗独自在瓦尔登湖畔的生活记录。书中将大量的人文、地理、历史以及动物学知识融入到优美的文字中，精致的语言散发着浓浓的人生哲理，让我们感受良多。

梭罗的文字如泉水般清冽，将山水与心灵契合。读他的故事时我们进入了一个纯净的世界，仿若我们也在湖畔休憩，在田间劳作，和他一起感受那鸟语花香。

哈丁曾说，《瓦尔登湖》内容丰富，意义深远，是简单生活的权威指南，是对大自然的真情描述，是向金钱社会的讨伐檄文，是一本圣书。

梭罗隐居在瓦尔登湖时正值第一次工业革命。在大家为金钱痴迷之时，梭罗毅然抛开一切，只身来到湖畔树林间，开始他平静自然的生活，在那一汪湖水中寻找心灵的栖息地。试想这样的不拘一格，豪放洒脱，淡然平和有几人可以做到?

《瓦尔登湖》中的一句话给我的印象很深：“很久以前，我丢失了一条猎犬，一匹枣红马和一只斑鸠，至今我仍在寻找它们。”他把自己的希望和梦想比喻成猎犬，枣红马和斑鸠，虽然很早之前就丢失了，但一直不放弃寻找。当下社会越发快节奏、物质化，空气中弥漫着浮躁、功利的气息。我们多少人能将梦想一路坚持下去?把目光直接朝着内心看，我们要的到底是什么?青年时满怀壮志结果却成了汉奸的汪精卫;本性善良却害死幼小婴儿的三鹿董事;“宁坐在宝马里哭也不愿在自行车上笑”的马诺;以及一个个只追逐名利的人们······放眼全国许多成为房奴的百姓，他们要的不过是温馨的生活，如今却成为让人喘不过气的还贷压力，房子何时比生活本身更重要了?那些表面光鲜浮华的物质何时又变得比内心的宁静安然更重要了?

梭罗说：“不要给我爱，不要给我钱，不要给我荣誉，给我真实就好。”

非淡泊无以明志，非宁静无以致远。无论如何都要为心中留一片净土。就让我们饮一杯清茶，同梭罗一起翱翔于山水之间，回归自然，回归纯洁，回归心灵的平静。

one of the most interesting questions about gullivers travels is whether the houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of swifts satire. in other words, in book iv, is swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? if we look closely at the way that the houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

first we have to see that swift does not even take gullver seriously. for instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. also, when he first sees the yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. he says, "i must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. this is why swift refers to erasmus darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the beagle-to show how gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. but if lemule gulliver is satirized, so are the houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. they walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. as gulliver says, "it was with the utmost astonishment that i witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a vienese waltz. to my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the lord edmund burke" . as this quote demonstrates, gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. for instance, the leader of the houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of charles dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the kings and queens of england up to george ii. swift subtly shows that this houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of queen elizabeths husband.

swifts satire of the houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. one of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that guenivre has brought with him to the island. first she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. but when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "as i watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than mr. pope being fitted by a clothier. she dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. my horse sniffed the creature and turned away." it might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. but it makes more sense if we see that swift is being satiric here: it is the female houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century england. the houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress gullivers horse. gulliver imagines the horse saying, sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held mr. pope on her back makes me queezy .

a final indication that the houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the houynhms visits lilliput, where he visits the french royal society. he goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at gallilee). the scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "the creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

he has accomplished the scientists goal, but the scientist is not happy, for his livelihood has now been destroyed. swifts clear implication is that even though the houyhnhmns are smart, they do not know how to use that knowledge for the benefit of society, only for their own prideful agrandizement.

throughout gullivers travels, the houyhnhms are shown to be an ideal gone wrong. though their intent might have been good, they dont know how to do what they want to do because they are filled with pride. they mislead gulliver and they even mislead themselves. the satire on them is particularly well explained by the new born houyhnhm who, having just been born, exclaims, "with this sort of entrance, what must i expect from the rest of my life!" .

当夜幕笼罩大地，远处灯光依稀，闪烁在建筑工地，我的心灵也随之渐渐超凡脱俗于喧嚣的世俗，回归于一片沉寂。无论白天的事物多么纷繁难解，它们都会沉积，铺在瓦尔登湖之底。每个人心底都可以拥有一片自己的天地。

《瓦尔登湖》带给我的是这种心境，一种自然和返璞归真的思考方式，以及将实物升入精神的思想境界。《瓦尔登湖》不是小说，没有故事情节，有的是自然的事实和深沉的思考，但它值得细细思读，理解出自己的哲学体系。这是一本寂寞、恬静、智慧的书，凝结了作者的感悟与思想，描摹出生活的本味模样。

《瓦尔登湖》记述了梭罗在他两年中的湖边隐居生活。他描绘了大自然的新奇与美好，延伸了无限的感慨与思考。他将两年的观察与思考合成一年来写。自然的规律是恒久不变的。梭罗是一个自由的人，他拥有非凡的生活技能，能摆脱世俗的羁绊。最重要的是，他乐于探索未知世界——这个世界还包括他的内心。他鼓励人们纯洁与简单，勇于按照人们更高的天性行事。

瓦尔登湖的寂静给了作者思考的空间，使作者一定程度上摆脱了无聊的应酬和社交活动等。他在湖边似乎孤身一人，但他其实并未断绝与外界的联系。准确地说，梭罗所厌恶的是毫无真诚与热情的社交活动，而且它们常常与豪奢联系在一起。相反地，自然往往更接近真理。

立在清澈的碧蓝色湖水旁，那幢他亲手建造的木屋是他思考的居所。他凭直觉和自己的意愿，来到这里进行他的生活实验。整整三百页的纸张，都透露出对“我”这一种生活方式作为固定的习惯。作者在湖边隐居的确——正如他所说的那样——是一个生活的实验。并且带领读者同他一道，在情节的发展之中，获得无法言喻的启迪。

限于人生阅历和学识的浅薄，我不敢说这十几万字我都能读透，更何况它囊括了太多的内容。然而无论如何，每个人结论都会是相同的，只不过理解的程度深浅不一而已。的确，这本书很难读，凡是浮躁的心情都不得不抛弃这本书。另一方面，唯有沉静的人在沉静的时空中方可与这高尚的思想共鸣。一旦沉静的心读进来了这本书，必获益匪浅。

我们所阅读的，并非是褒贬“仁义道德”之流，而是真理。书中描写的全部是真实的大自然，与城市中灯红酒绿的嘈杂迥异，湖边的鸟兽虫鱼鸣叫的喧嚣更接近于自然的真理。更广义地来讲，作者竭力强调的心灵和精神上的宁静和探索，并非简单的远离世俗退居山林。有人渴望像他一样，拥有一片属于自己的山林。这显然不符合他的思想境界。真正的瓦尔登湖是一种生活方式，存在于作者以及每个人的心中，不是一成不变仅存在山林中的，并且值得注意的是，作者在瓦尔登湖边始终是一位占住者。即使作者生活在一座大都市中，他同样能够凭自己的意愿，到内心的海洋中探索。

尽管如此，作者还是可惜地感觉到，城市离真理太远了。城市在人们的意识中建造起来，早已被人类狭隘的观念充满了。作者逃离都市，隐居湖畔;同样他也逃离固定的思维模式，隐居到自由、孤独的思想中去。作者因为贞洁，以至于他都感到自己永远不能拥有绝对纯洁了;来不及为自己的哀悼，他又向自己提出了新的要求，要以人类更高的天性去生活。他不去追名逐利，又困惑于我们顽固的思维方式。有时你感到他在颠倒是非，其实每次都有一个思维敏捷的人紧跟他的思想，跃过腐朽思想的栅栏，体悟到其中真正的含义。因此，贫穷可以是富有，劳动可以是苦役，虚度光阴、野蛮可以是高尚，聪明可以是愚蠢，购买可以不花费任何钱财，最终复杂也可以是简单。要想做到这一切，就得回归到最基本的精神实质。

水的简单赋予了它最丰富的内涵。就好像科学家合成出的物质，无论多么复杂，都不可能超越水的简单一样，《瓦尔登湖》也是一座不能逾越的巅峰。

Mark Twains short story of "one million pounds" is a very good work. The article on the "money is everything," "money is omnipotent," the idea of a satire, to expose the ugly face of capitalist society.

"One million pounds" is about a poor, honest man, that is, the heroine of this story has received a pair of brothers, the letter sent to him inside one million pounds. The brothers had made a bet, gambling, if a poor, honest people who come knocking on the door received the one million pounds, he will be what kind of results? Brother that he would starve to death because he could not prove that the money was his own, will be subject to other peoples doubts, and even the banks do not let him save money. His younger brother that he would lead a very good, and therefore they have the brothers of one million pounds will be loaned to check the poorest people, and spent 30 days abroad.

Did not expect that during this period of time, people have the rare fortune suddenly rich, has tried to cozy up to him, from the free food, buy clothes, free accommodation, like a beggar, like to please him, and continue to improve his social status until the exception of the highest outdoor Wang Duke on! Not only that, he also has been a good wife and 30,000 pounds of bank interest, and finally from two brothers got a very good job. Lived a very, very happy life.

See here, I am so envious of the "lucky" the heroine, but at the same time I would like to: people reason to curry favor with him, not just because when people value money too it? Worship of money is shameful and should not be reaping more! Money is not omnipotent, the world than money, there are many more important things.

1845年，拿了一柄斧头的亨利大卫梭罗，孤独地跑到瓦尔登湖畔，砍树伐木，盖起了小木屋。在自己亲手建造的天地中，他默默地聆听、感受、思索一切，以自然为师而又非遗世独立，现实、向上的人生烈焰也时时在他心头交织升腾。两年的独居时光给了他很多，付诸文字，便有了《瓦尔登湖》。

瑞士的阿米尔说一片自然风景是一个心灵的境界”，《瓦尔登湖》正是一个纤尘不染的心灵境界。它静，太静了。只有在红日斜坠的黄昏以后，平静躁动，心情神澈，开卷展读，才能渐渐地进入这一奇妙王国，直至心神皆醉。

梭罗崇尚实践和脚踏实地，于是他从基本的“经济篇”开始，最终以“只有我们睁开眼睛醒过来的那一天，天才亮了”的日子结束，在他行云流水的字里行间，散发着大海的气息与木叶的清芳，也透露出心底的洒脱与恬静。梭罗散漫的文笔，不但能从猫头鹰的号叫、康科德的钟声、田野与溪流中揭示出永恒的真理，而且也能将松鼠、山雀、鹧鸪的活动变成诗化的哲学。无论白昼“大地生长豆荚”之时，或是冬夜“临湖畔听冰裂”之际，梭罗总能带领我们轻松地穿越“议论、偏见、传统、幻想和表面现象的泥泞沼泽”，跳上我们称为现实的坚实地面。一切景物描绘，优美细致，清丽动人，像湖样晶莹，如松般苍翠，掷地仿佛可叮咚作响。尤其是对湖四周景色的描绘更是令人倾倒，简直是写下来的幽梦了。

梭罗不是万事不关心的闲云野鹤。强烈反对奴隶制度、强调公民不服从权利的他，早已成为引导无数人穿越荆棘、登上理想彼岸的行动与精神的导师。在《瓦尔登湖》中，跟着梭罗，能懂得生活中转瞬即逝的美丽，感受到春天与黎明的朝气蓬勃，也会不知不觉在他的炽热信念中融化。

一生如此，“简单而宠郁，孤独而芬芳”的梭罗，为世界文学史留下了这一本独特的绿色经典，也为我们提供了一本难得的静静的书。值得一提的是，本书翻译徐迟先生的译笔优美传神，与全书风格契合无间，奈何徐迟先生也于前年驾鹤西归。品着这满纸烟霞，想着梭罗、瓦尔登湖与徐迟，亦不乏“亦幻亦真难取舍”之感了。————存少辉

散读一百多年以前的《瓦尔登湖》，作者美国人，亨利戴维·梭罗。

它是一本安静的书，寂寞的书，孤独的书。它属于一个人的书。如果心未安静，很难进入书里。

作者活了44年，人生短暂，简单馥郁，孤独而芬芳。读者发现，他的精神生活十分丰富，精美绝伦，世上罕见。现实生活中和他交往的人并不多，更多的人和他的文字神交。

译者在序中对读者写到：

你能把你的心安静下来吗?如果你的心并没有安静下来，我说，你也许最好是先把你的心安静下来，然后你再打开这本书，否则你也许会读不下去，认为它太浓缩，难读，艰深，甚至会觉得它莫明其妙，莫知所云。

读它，最好在夜深人静。书中的文字，“深沉而敏感的抒情”着。记得朱光潜先生在《谈美谈文学》中的“情与辞”中提到，一切艺术都是抒情的，都必表现一种心灵上的感触。又，不表现任何情致的文字就不算是文学作品。

我不知道其它读者怎么理解这个文学观点，理解“抒情”两字在文学作品中所起到的重要功用，相信大多数有一定品位的读者会认同的。译者还提到一个词，就是“超凡入圣”，我想这是译者对《瓦尔登湖》最高的文学艺术评价了。

《瓦尔登湖》几乎所有的文字围饶这些主题的关键词展开叙述。比如：清新、健康、绿色、低碳、环保、引人向上;它讲自力更生、丰衣足食、简单生活、快乐日子。它甚至可以说是一本现代生活指南书，绿色经典文库范本，西方环境科学名著。

在《种豆》的篇章里，我特别喜欢开场的句式。

“这时我的豆子，已经种好了的一行一行地加起来，长度总有七英里了吧，急待锄草松土，因为最后一批还没播种下去，最先一批已经长得很不错了;真是不容再拖延的了。”

瞧，文字极易地松软，蓬松，字里行间，似湿漉漉的黑土，长出了一行一行豆苗。青青嫩嫩的芽儿钻出土地，抽着地气，打着哈欠，迎着小雨粒茁壮成长。

“真是不容再拖延的了。”是道春光无限好，时间流散无奈?其实，纯粹似幅画，西方陶渊明式田园风光再现。我想。

再读《孤独》篇，梭罗写到：

“大部分时间内，我觉得寂寞是有益于健康的。有了伴儿，即使是最好的伴儿，不久也要厌倦，弄得很糟糕。我爱孤独。我没有碰到比寂寞更好的同伴了。”

梭罗把寂寞当成好朋友款待，在朋友身上读出美味了。可能，这是世界上关于寂寞的最好诠释。

讲到时间概念，梭罗这样形容。

“时间只是我垂钓的溪。我喝溪水，喝水时候我看到它那沙底，它多么浅啊。它的汨汨的流水逝去了，可是永恒留了下来。”

梭罗把时间放入手下垂钓。时间如流水，一去不复。垂钓时间，时间垂钓，是一种怎样的思想境界?垂钓，我理解为现代词“把握”之意。珍惜时间，把握当下。

梭罗在结束语中开头讲到：如果生病的话，医生要明智地劝告你转移个地方，换换空气。

试想，一个人到达生命的某个阶段，习惯把某个地点视为可能安家落户的处所，也想换换空气，安静下来，阅读自己，审视自己。

瓦尔登湖给了梭罗一个尽可能的好去处。如果我们每个人能够像梭罗，找到一处像瓦尔登湖那样美丽的湖泊，和他一样在那里生活、阅读、倾听、种豆、生火、做饭、接待访客、感受村子、感受冬天的湖、在室内取暖。如此，居住湖畔完成一项人生课题，是对自身心灵深度的最好“衡量”。

面对平静如镜的湖，精神上的瓦尔登湖，产生美好联想。岁月静好，生命安详，思想自然纯情。梭罗面对湖、眺望湖，思考、沉思。他享受寂寞，阅读人生。

而我，你，他，我们大家呢?彼时，我仿佛站在瓦尔登湖畔，看见湖面波光粼粼，湖岸三两垂钓者，四周摇曳的枫树，思绪停滞，沉醉于瓦尔登湖无边的意象中。

于是，我的目光越过湖畔的树林，开始明亮起来。《瓦尔登湖》如在黑暗中点燃的一矩火把，照亮三十年、四十年甚至更长的路。在路上，我想用明镜似的目光尽情阅读光明的世界，美丽的世界。

This winter vacation, I read one of the world famous book called one thousand one night. It is also called Arabian Nights，This is an ancient book, there are many old stories about people in Arabia.

Once upon a time, there was a king, he married a woman every day, but the next morning the king killed his wife. After three years, he has killed more than one thousand women. Once, the prime minister’s daughter thought of a way to prevent the king’s cruel killing. Then, the girl asked the king to marry her. Every night, she told a wonderful story to the king, and when the king want to kill her, her story was getting into the most exciting part, so the king has to give up. Night after night, the girl told about one thousand one nights, and finally, it affected the king to change his mind about her. This is the origin of one thousand one night.

In this book, there are a lot of very strange story, the story of the fisherman and the devil , fisherman and four-color fish story, the story of Aladdin and the Magic Lamp and so on, some stories tell about the brave spirit of adventure, and some praise people’s brave daring to fight with the evil forces. there are humorous, sad, interesting, horrible, tragic and all sorts of stories.

我，静静地坐在树林之中，注视着不远处的那一汪湖泊，明澈而又平静。岸上一座木屋，朴素而又亲切。湖中漂着一叶扁舟，一个人静静地划着小船，目光沉静而寂寞。木浆轻轻一拨，湖面泛起一阵涟漪，那调皮的阳光，在水中跳跃着，跳跃着，跳向远方……

偶然之中，翻开了一本书，瞬间被作者恬淡宁静的生活所吸引，疯狂地喜欢上了大卫·梭罗在那距离康科德两公里的瓦尔登湖畔，独自在自己建造的小木屋里渔猎，耕耘，沉思，写作的简朴生活。

梭罗1817年出生，在他十六岁时进入哈佛大学就读，其思想深受爱默生的影响，成为了当代著名的自然主义者与哲学家，提倡回归本心，亲近自然。1845年，28岁的梭罗为了逃离城市的喧闹，躲避金钱的束缚，只身来到距小镇两英里的瓦尔登湖独自生活，在自然中找回最初的自己。

渐渐的，我的灵魂沉浸在了这一本寂寞的书中，心情也变得寂寞和宁静。正如惠特曼所说：“在路易斯安那，我看见了一颗活着的橡树在生长，它孤独地站立着，有些青苔从树枝上垂下来，那里没有一个同类，他独自生长着，发出许多苍绿黑黝黝的快乐的叶子。”我多希望自己就是一片叶子，与他们相伴为趣，简单快乐地生长。

在这个丰富多彩的时代里，我们这些生活在城市里的孩子，多希望在钢筋水泥的森林里找到一汪清澈的湖泊；在汽车的鸣笛与人们的叫喊中传来歌声婉转，溪水淙淙；在浑浊的空气里寻找到一寸心灵的静地。

好在，暑假来了，我们可以停下脚步，走进自然，感受那清风拂过脸颊，阳光跳上肩膀，与蝴蝶一起快乐飞舞的乐趣；暑假来了，我们可以停下脚步，躺在草地上，听听那风，看看那云，数数夜空里那些顽皮地眨着眼睛的星星。在静静的月光里，深深地呼吸，呼出那城市的烦躁与喧闹，吸入一份内心的宁静与恬淡。

合上这本与世隔绝的《瓦尔登湖》时，窗外小虫呢喃，月光如水。

“一个人物质生活的丰富并不能带来心灵的纯洁和净化，只有追求精神境界的高尚才能丰富人的内心。”“为生活做减法，为思想做加法。”读罢美国著名的思想家、作家梭罗伟大的著作《瓦尔登湖》，作者这两句精辟的言辞一直在我脑海中停留。

1845年春天，心傲孤远、风华正茂的梭罗，借来一柄斧头独自一人走进瓦尔登湖畔的森林深处，几乎不借助任何现代文明的帮助，完全依靠着自力更生和原始交换生活了2年9个月。他虽毕业于世界闻名的哈佛大学，但没有选择经商发财或者从政成为明星，而是平静地选择了瓦尔登湖，选择了心灵的自由和闲适。他搭起木屋，开荒种地，写作看书，过着非常简朴、原始的生活。在这期间，他如饥似渴的阅读，思考生命的意义和人生的价值，努力的写作，终于完成了《瓦尔登湖》。梭罗的文章简练有力，朴实自然，富有思想内容，在美国19世纪散文中独树一帜。他的思想对英国工党、印度的甘地与美国黑人领袖马丁·路德·金等人都有很大的影响。阅读《瓦尔登湖》，我们时刻感受到作者对湖光山色景物的细致描写;感受到作者对自然界和小动物的怜爱。由于他对东方哲学思想的深刻研究，作品中还不时闪烁着东方哲学的智慧，如“苟日新，日日新，又日新”和“德不孤，必有邻”等。

当然，他给予我们最大的震撼是书中对生命、对理想、对自由的向往和推崇，启发我们找回生命最本真的意义。“当你最富有之时，却是你最贫穷之日。喜欢吹毛求疵的人，哪怕是在天堂也能找到错误。你纵然是贫穷，也要喜欢你的生活。即使是在济贫院里，你依然拥有喜悦、开心、荣幸的时光。黄昏的霞光照耀在济贫院的窗台上，如同照在富人家窗户一样耀眼夺目。”这样的语句闪烁着人性的光芒，让你对财富观有更深的理解。曾经有一个私企的老板问我，“曾经我以为拥有了足够的金钱就能够幸福了，可如今我已经拥有很大一笔财富，可为什么我一点都没感觉出来幸福呢?”其实，金钱和幸福不是相等的，因为幸福是一种从心底发出的满足感，金钱虽然能满足你的需要但它不是支撑我们幸福的原因。自以为拥有财富的人，其实是被财富所拥有 。

据英国《每日邮报》网站报道，一项研究发现，快乐不是银行中的巨额存款、高速跑车和品牌服装，而是家庭、朋友和大自然的美丽。当被问及最重要的快乐是什么时，2000名受访者中有22%的人选择了欢笑，紧随其后的是与知心朋友共进美食(占总人数的21%)，拥抱以19%的比例名列第三。其他名列前10位的快乐还有：太阳照在脸上的感觉、读一本好书、沿海难漫步和盖干净的床单入睡，以及看日落、翻阅老照片追忆往昔和闻到刚修剪过的青草的气息。是的，温暖的阳光与自由的时间对于我们人类来说是共有的、平等的，也许是最大的财富。就像梭罗在《瓦尔登湖》中描述的那样：“门前那早春的积雪同在消融。我亲眼目睹，一个心静知足的人，在那里生活得宛若在皇宫里一样，生活得如此开心又如此心满意足。”

“语语惊人，字字闪光，沁人肺腑，动我衷肠”，译者徐迟先生这样评价《瓦尔登湖》。朋友，如果你还在为找不到生活的真谛还在追求幸福，不妨在夜深人静时捧着它，像梭罗那样寻找简单的快乐，你的人生会因为简单而快乐!

The author pays homage to Hans Christian Andersen‘s compassionate tale with this faithful adaptation. Kids can relate to the duckling‘s dilemma; part of the growing-up proceis pulling away from those around you and developing a strong sense of self. Children have also witnessed or experienced the teasing that is part and parcel of childhood.

This agelestory speaks acrogenerations with its reaffirming message. In this age of instant gratification, Andersen‘s tale reminds readers that some things are worth waiting for and that a pleasure deferred (whether by choice or necessity) is often the sweetest one of all.

Pinkney‘s descriptive passages resonate with the splendor of nature‘s beauty. The glowing watercolors, filled with intricate details, make each blade of gravisible, and the delicately drawn, nearly transparent mosquitoes are as ethereal as they are in life. The subtle details incorporated into the scenes--a frog catching a passing fly at the pond and a tiny mouse perched by a crate in the old woman‘s cottage--make children take another look.

One day he heard a sound of whirring wings, and up in the air he saw a flock of birds flying high. They were as bright as the snow that had fallen during the night, and their long necks were stretched southward. Oh, if only he could go with them! But what sort of companion could he be to those beautiful beings?

‘I am too ugly even for a dog to eat,‘ the duckling thought. Jerry Pinkney‘s poignant text and rich artwork convey the timeleappeal of this tale of hardship and redemption. Anyone who has suffered the sting of ostracism can sympathize with the ugly duckling‘s plight and will relish the uplifting conclusion.

Its a short story by O.Henry that has moved me for a long time.Maybe most of you are familar with its name,that is,The Gift of the Magi.I have read it many times but every time I like to read it slowly and deliberately.I think "The Gift of the Magi"

is meant to be savored.

Maybe there is no necessity for me to repeat the main idea of the story.But Im

so fascinated with the short story that I want to retell it yo you,and to myself.

It happened to a very poor but blissful young couple named Jim and Della in the end of 18th century in England.Because of the maladies of that society and the effect of economic crisis,they worked hard but earned little.Life is very hard for them.Despite of this,their love to each other and the enthusiasm for life didnt changed at all.When Chrismas day was approuching ,Della used the money she got from selling her beautiful hair which she treasured very much to give Jim a fob for his grandfathers pocket watch.But Jim had already sold that watch to buy Della tortoiseshell combs to wear in her long hair,not knowing shed cut it off.

It appears that the gifts they gave each other have been useless.But I think they gave each other the best of what they had to make the other happy.Isnt that true love?We can image,in such rough conditions,as it said in the story,"Life is made up of sobs,sniffles,and smiles,with sniffles predominating."Itst absolute reasonable for them to be beaten by the misery.But the fact is that no matter how tough life had been,they wouldt lose heart.With strong faith and their love ,they did their best to make the other pleased."Whennever Mr. James came home and reached his flat ,above he was called Jimand greatly hugged by Mrs. James."Maybe this account is the best description of their love and struggle against hard life.It was said that the povertier life is ,the firmer and truer love is."Actually,theyd given the very best they had out of love.

"They are too foolish children in a flat,who most unwisely sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house.But in a last word,to the wise of these days,let it be said that of all who give gifts these two were the wisest."Said the writer in the last paragraph.Yes,they are wisest.They are the magi.Are there any reasons for us not to show respect for the young couple?

I remind my grandparents.They have spent fifty years together.No romantic words,no stirring behaviours,just comman even pedestrian life.But I can say love exists in every detail of their life.They have gone through war period,three years natural disasters,cultural revolution and so on.But no matter what happens,they are always considering for the other.Even now both of them have become old step by step,they still cared about each other.My grandparents,in my opinion,is a pair of lovers forever.

Love has nothing to do with money,possession or status.Its consideration,tolerance and respect.Its giving ones best to the other even it means sacrifice.Its affection which connects two persons hearts,and its reinforced by adversities.

Struggle against adversities.Nothing did they have,at least they owened love.Never give up as long as love exists.From"The Gift of the Magi",from Jim and Della and from my grandparents,I have learned a lot about love,life and hope.

Learn to Live

——my thoughts after reading Joan of Arc

Sunshine shines over the statue in Orleans. The ordinary but famous girl named Joan is riding on her horse, smiling and looking down at the land that she has loved and fought on. She is the heroine of France, the saint from heaven. Her influences shine over every person’s heart, and I am deeply impressed by her story.

When Louis XIII was the king, the British and the Burundians invaded France and wanted to have the northern part of France. Joan helped French people coronate their new king, Louis XIV, getting almost all the invaded land back with the help of three saints. But after that, she was caught by the Burundians and was burnt on a cross by her enemy. This is the famous story about Joan, the saint. From a village girl to a national heroine, she only used a few years. How could Joan of Arc do that? I wonder.

Someone says the saints have chosen her and the God has given her power. But actually the real virgin doesn’t exist, From the birth of Jesus Christ in the first century, people have controlled the Christianity. I think the religion has become a tool between people. This kind of opinion about the success of Joan must be wrong.

Someone said, Joan had this wonderful success because of her confidence and will. I quite agree with this opinion. Because there aren’t any virgins in the world, so I think the appearance of the saints was only in Joan’s mind, actually nothing special happened to Joan. I think the things which really mattered were Joan’s thoughts. In my opinion, Joan must have some military ability to lead the whole army, because of her unusual image, Joan became more confident to the success. It let Joan had the will to be successful. So the success before did not happen by accident,. After some battles, Joan said that she had lost her support from the saints, but actually this didn’t mind. The more important thing was that she had lost her confidence and will, so she lost the battle at last.

So I think confidence and will are just like the foundation of success. All the success depends on them.

In the real world, confidence and will is always very important. During the XX Athens Olympic Games, Li Ting and Sun Tiantian have won the gold medal for the women’s double in the tennis game. It was the first time our anthem playing on the tennis court. Some medium says that they have won by chance. It was only a fairy tale. But I don’t think so. Actually they have won because of their believing in themselves, because they have confidence and will, so they have created a fairy tale in Greece. Their confidence and will have made the success, not by accident.

In our daily life, we must have confidence and will as well. Before the test we need to be confident to our actual strength or we’ll not give full play to our initiative. We need to be confident when we are speaking in public or others will not remember you among all the speakers. We need to have will in studying or we’ll not learn things solidly. We need to have will in our daily life or we’ll give up the things we are doing now. If we have confidence and will in our daily life, then I believe you’ll live brighter.

Notre Dame DE Paris is the French Victor Hugo wrote. First of all, he is bell ringers Quasimodo ugly, hes ugly, let a person feel afraid: horseshoe mouth, in the right eye is covered with a large tumor, big buck teeth... . Quasimodo is deaf, kyphosis, and the lame, and cruel and unreasonable, who saw all hate him.

Gypsy girl esmeralda has fairy beauty, love as long as she appeared, would have caused a sensation. All the men in the book saw she will fall in love with her. She was very kind, in order to save the poor poet and his false get married, she gave her money to busk income homeless children.

This book mainly to write only listen Quasimodo raised by his vice bishop Notre Dame DE Paris, but vice bishop assassinated, esmeralda royal captain of love, also forced love, esmeralda to marry her, or she was hanged. When love the esmeralda condemnation of that day of, Quasimodo brave love, esmeralda to Notre Dame tower. But the king sent against the cathedral of Notre Dame, and the girl hanged. Quasimodo grieving, and finally find love, esmeralda bones, committed suicide in beside her.

巴黎圣母院是法国维克多.雨果写的。首先他讲的是敲钟人卡西莫多的丑陋，他的丑陋让人感到 害怕：马蹄形的嘴巴、右眼被一个大瘤遮盖，大龅牙……。卡西莫多也是个聋子、驼背和瘸子，而且凶暴、蛮横，谁见了都讨厌他。

吉普赛少女爱森梅拉达有仙女般的美貌，只要她一出现，就会引起轰动。这本书中所有男人一见到她就会爱上她。她非常善良，为了救穷诗人和他假结婚，她把自己卖艺所得的钱都分给流浪孩子。

这本书主要写卡西莫多只听抚养他长大的巴黎圣母院副主教的话，但副主教刺杀了爱森梅拉达爱的皇家卫队长，还逼爱森梅拉达嫁给她，否则将她绞死。当爱森梅拉达受刑的那天，卡西莫多勇敢的把爱森梅拉达举到圣母院的钟楼上。可国王派人攻打圣母院，并将姑娘绞死。卡西莫多悲痛欲绝，最后找到爱森梅拉达的尸骨，在她旁边自杀了。

One of the most interesting questions about Gullivers Travels is whether the Houyhnhnms represent an ideal of rationality or whether on the other hand they are the butt of Swifts satire. In other words, in Book IV, is Swift poking fun at the talking horses or does he intend for us to take them seriously as the proper way to act? If we look closely at the way that the Houyhnhnms act, we can see that in fact Swift does not take them seriously: he uses them to show the dangers of pride.

First we have to see that Swift does not even take Gullver seriously. For instance, his name sounds much like gullible, which suggests that he will believe anything. Also, when he first sees the Yahoos and they throw excrement on him, he responds by doing the same in return until they run away. He says, "I must needs discover some more rational being," even though as a human he is already the most rational being there is. This is why Swift refers to Erasmus Darwins discovery of the origin of the species and the voyage of the Beagle-to show how Gulliver knows that people are at the top of the food chain. But if Lemule Gulliver is satirized, so are the Houyhnhnms, whose voices sound like the call of castrati. They walk on two legs instead of four, and seem to be much like people. As Gulliver says, "It was with the utmost astonishment that I witnessed these creatures playing the flute and dancing a Vienese waltz. To my mind, they seemed like the greatest humans ever seen in court, even more dextrous than the Lord Edmund Burke" . As this quote demonstrates, Gulliver is terribly impressed, but his admiration for the Houyhnhnms is short-lived because they are so prideful. For instance, the leader of the Houyhnhnms claims that he has read all the works of Charles Dickens, and that he can singlehandedly recite the names of all the Kings and Queens of England up to George II. Swift subtly shows that this Houyhnhnms pride is misplaced when, in the middle of the intellectual competition, he forgets the name of Queen Elizabeths husband.

Swifts satire of the Houyhnhnms comes out in other ways as well. One of the most memorable scenes is when the dapple grey mare attempts to woo the horse that Guenivre has brought with him to the island. First she acts flirtatiously, parading around the bewildered horse. But when this does not have the desired effect, she gets another idea: "As I watched in amazement from my perch in the top of a tree, the sorrel nag dashed off and returned with a yahoo on her back who was yet more monstrous than Mr. Pope being fitted by a clothier. She dropped this creature before my nag as if offering up a sacrifice. My horse sniffed the creature and turned away." It might seem that we should take this scene seriously as a failed attempt at courtship, and that consequently we should see the grey mare as an unrequited lover. But it makes more sense if we see that Swift is being satiric here: it is the female Houyhnhnm who makes the move, which would not have happened in eighteenth-century England. The Houyhnhm is being prideful, and it is that pride that makes him unable to impress Gullivers horse. Gulliver imagines the horse saying, Sblood, the notion of creating the bare backed beast with an animal who had held Mr. Pope on her back makes me queezy .

A final indication that the Houyhnmns are not meant to be taken seriously occurs when the leader of the Houynhms visits Lilliput, where he visits the French Royal Society. He goes into a room in which a scientist is trying to turn wine into water (itself a prideful act that refers to the marriage at Gallilee). The scientist has been working hard at the experiment for many years without success, when the Houyhnmn arrives and immediately knows that to do: "The creature no sooner stepped through the doorway than he struck upon a plan. Slurping up all the wine in sight, he quickly made water in a bucket that sat near the door" .

合上《瓦尔登湖》墨绿色的封面，一股清凉的湖水已然汇入心间，澄澈见底，将心境荡涤得如一泓秋水，不染纤尘。正如徐迟先生在《序言》中所说：“《瓦尔登湖》是一本静静的书，一本寂寞的书，一本孤独的书，是一本寂寞、恬静、智慧的书。”它只适合在“寂寞和恬静”时阅读，静静地读，读得静静。我想，从这个意义上来说，《瓦尔登湖》是属于心灵的。

这本书的封面上有这样一幅耐人寻味的图片：两行向远方延伸的铁轨中间，立着无数挺拔的大树。这是否是本书在以一种含蓄的方式暗示着我们别的一点什么?梭罗说：“来到这片树林是因为想过一种经过省察的生活,去面对人生最本质的问题。”我在想，在现实的世界里，现代文明改造和穿越自然环境之前，是否也该多一些自省与自察?因此，从这个意义上说，《瓦尔登湖》又是属于现时代的。

由此，《瓦尔登湖》在阅读空间中占有两个起点和终点，那就是心灵和现时代。

导语：《狂蟒之灾》在蜿蜒流长的亚马逊河流域的雨林深处，生活着古老而神秘的舒尔族。他们与世隔绝，以食人蛇为叩拜图腾。围绕着舒尔族人的传说和秘密让雨淋之外的人们振奋不已。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

Every preconceived notion audiences might have about "Anaconda" is correct. This supposed serpentine shocker features doomed adventurers wading through murky water while a deadly snake approaches and "Jaws"-like music throbs. The plot retraces a formula employed by countless predecessors to kill off its supporting characters in a predictable sequence. And theres the bad guy with the foreign accent, and the requisite romance between handsome anthropologist and shapely journalist. Its all here, as is an ironic comfort in watching such a well-worn tale from the dark side.

Dr. Steven Cale (Eric Stoltz) is heading down the Amazon in search of an undocumented Indian tribe. Joining him is Terri Flores ("Selenas" Jennifer Lopez), a filmmaker charged with recording Dr. Cales quest. Ten minutes into their voyage, snaky Paul Sarone (Jon Voight) jumps aboard and commandeers the boat to begin a Captain Ahab-style hunt for his gigantic underwater nemesis: the titular anaconda upon whose nonexistent shoulders this movie rests. Despite satisfactory performances from the cast, the films human characters remain secondary to this nasty snake and the special effects that created it.

Scary, this movie isnt. The faux serpent, albeit an impressive creature, looks wholly unrealistic as it zips through water and air like a Saturday morning cartoon character. And such schlocky touches as the anacondas penchant for regurgitation are more gross (and funny) than frightening. What chills there are spring more from standard stalk-and-startle techniques than from the creepy characteristics associated with snakes. Director Luis Llosa ("The Specialist") shot "Anaconda" in Brazil, and the tropical setting imbues his movie with much-needed authenticity and cinematic richness. Llosa advances the story at an absorbing clip that never bores the audience, and he wisely eschews any high-minded discourse about good and evil. As cheesy, predictable horror flicks go, "Anaconda" squeezes considerable life from its limited aspirations.

《雾都孤儿》揭露许多当时的社会问题，如救济院、童工、以及帮派吸收青少年参与犯罪等。以下是小编带来的雾都孤儿英文读后感，希望对你有帮助。

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I dont think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on peoples honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing theirkindness, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.

That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell thosevermin-to-beto learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

还记得第一次读《瓦尔登湖》是在初中，那时候只是读了这本书的一章节便无可救药的被吸引了。他的文字似乎有种独立于世的清醇香气，散发着清新自然的气息，字里行间都充满了对大自然的崇敬和热爱。书中的景物描写很美很纯粹，让人心驰神往。想必这个人跟别人很不相同吧。果然，当老师介绍《瓦尔登湖》的作者时印证了我的猜测，梭罗，真的很不一般。梭罗(1817-1862)，美国作家，思想家，自然主义者。他曾任教师，从事过各种体力劳动，他的著作都是根据他在大自然中的体验完成的。《瓦尔登湖》记录了他于1854至1847年在康科德附近的瓦尔登湖畔度过的一段隐居生活。在他的笔下，自然，人以及超验主义理想交汇融合，浑然一体。他是19世纪超验主义运动的代表人物。梭罗的文章简练有力，朴实自然，富有思想内容，在美国19世纪的散文中独树一帜。他的思想对英国工党、印度的甘地与美国黑人领袖马丁.路德金等人都有很大影响。他毕业于著名的哈佛大学，但是没有选择经商发财或者从政成为明星，而是平静的选择了瓦尔登湖，选择了心灵的自由和闲适。他搭起木屋，开荒种地，写作看书，过着非常简谱、原始的生活。我们不难注意到，梭罗在创作《瓦尔登湖》的时候正是19世纪中叶，那时正是资本主义的飞速发展时期，在当时的历史背景下，作者竟能冒天下之大不韪，这样特立独行，怀着一颗质朴纯真之心踏上了这样一段非同寻常的旅程，这种勇气和魄力令人无比钦佩，而在梭罗心中能存有这样的不带有一丝一毫受世俗之气污染的纯净思想更是让我肃然!这澄明的思想如同一阵清新长风掠过所有读过此书之人的心际，不禁让人为之精神一振，他要让人们明白在这个世界上除了追求物质生活外还有另外一种生活，就是可以带来无比快乐的简朴生活!

如今再读梭罗的《瓦尔登湖》，再一次感受到了初读时的心动，我独自一人，在夜深人静的时候捧着它，像是在寻找生命最本真的意义。

很早就听说过梭罗写的这本书《瓦尔登湖》，阅读这样的经典文学作品总是让人精神愉悦，特别是作者所写内容皆是亲身所为，在这喧闹的城市中，在这样快节奏的生活状态下，阅读这样的名著会使人的心灵像夜晚的天空一样宁静，工作一天的疲倦感也减轻许多。这样一本适合在夜深人静时，细细品味的好书是难能可贵的。

文中作者用细腻优美的语言，详尽记述了两年多的湖畔生活，从中可以感受到梭罗对于瓦尔登湖的热爱，对大自然的热爱，正是这种发自内心的情感，才促使作者静静地在湖边度过了两年多的日子，写出了如此经典的著作来。这使我不禁想起了陶渊明的采菊东篱下，悠然见南山的田园生活，与陶渊明不同的是，梭罗主动将自身置于近乎原始状态的湖畔，拥有的只是一座小木屋和简陋的生活器具，却靠着强大的内心世界，在湖边孤独的生活着、创作着，写出了这部不朽的文学作品，让人着实感到敬佩。

现代社会发达的生产力，创造了先进的文明社会，但是伴随而来的还有人们无限膨胀的欲望，很多物品的发展甚至脱离了其本身的功能，为了换更大的房子，更高档的汽车而拼命的工作，忽略了身边许多美好的事物。更有甚者成为了金钱的奴隶，放弃了道德良知，突破了法律底线，被社会所抛弃。作者在文中展示了另外一种价值观，抛弃名利，做回真实的自己，在大自然中自由自在的生活方式，很值得现代人们学习和借鉴。

读过本书后，我也一直在思考自己的生活，从学校毕业后一直努力的工作着，生活也从学校那种简单规律变得复杂起来，失去了思考的时间。梭罗书中所提倡的那种简化的生活，不被外界纷繁复杂的事物所迷惑，直面生活本质很值得我去深思。梭罗最后提到“不管你的生活多么卑微，那也要面对它过下去;不要躲避它，也不要贬损它，生活毕竟不像你那么要不得吧。”因为，在梭罗看来，生命永远没有想象中的恶劣。这种乐观积极的生活态度，给予我莫大的鼓励和信心，是我从文中汲取的最大收获。

“非淡泊无以明志，非宁静无以致远。”送给正在奋斗中的我和朋友们，对于美好生活的向往是我不懈的追求。

导语：《瓦尔登湖》梭罗在书中详尽地描述了他在瓦尔登湖湖畔一片再生林中度过两年又两月的生活以及期间他的许多思考。下面是yuwenmi小编为大家整理的优秀英语读后感，欢迎阅读与借鉴，谢谢!

read through some of the more than half of the "walden pond", to be honest look at a lot of paragraphs do not really understand, but say it is fun sections of animals that people read fresh.

the first animal is the rooster attention, and that the most common birds, however the authors pen in the air all of a sudden and very poor. thoreau is the author described them this way: the rooster, pheasant was originally, and their chirping is the worlds most beautiful music, better than all the other animals, but most of the time to fill the gaps in their voice is their wife - the mother chickens are noisy, its no wonder that they ultimately can only be the poultry, not to mention what kind of a chicken egg. these words can not help people desperately want to remember the music chenming rooster, the result was a loss, except in writing from the mechanical "oo" sound. as for the hen, they can only remember them after the end of each time it is under the "giggle" to stop the called.

walden pond, how can there are so many wild animal? every day it seems that the author and not the name they say hello. are familiar with ant, but where the ants are like the soldiers how to ah, make that an ant war was afraid to read the small bio of contempt. lovely fledgling partridge destitute people, they only obey the instinct of mothers and their own oh, the fullness of their long feathers of the body of small branches and leaves together to maintain the same posture, where to stay motionless, it picked up when a stranger or follow it, it continues to stay as motionless, or take your eyes clean. scary, of course, most diving birds, and it always sent laugh, when it is from this lake first dive, the observer much hunting or after a lot of fun. what it is, you can go to the bottom of the lake to fish in the bird.

after all the human animal is, ah, just high-level animals. the author predicted that the result of human progress must be to give up meat, as the savage to the civilized around after people give up bad habits, like eating. i do not know human beings are not one day give up meat, it is very curious about the rabbit call. in the book, the author said: rabbit to the end, the truth was a child cry. on rabbits, the most profound impression that the tree hit a hare, but there is no written record of our had been a poor hunt rabbits.

​【参考译文】

阅读一些超过一半的“《瓦尔登湖》”,诚实地看很多段落并不真正理解,但说它是有趣的部分动物,人们读新鲜。

第一只动物是公鸡的注意,而最常见的鸟,然而作者的笔在空中突然和非常贫穷。摘要:梭罗是作者这样描述的:公鸡,野鸡,他们的鸣叫是世界上最美丽的音乐,比所有其他动物都好,但大部分时间是他们的妻子-妈妈的鸡吵闹,难怪他们最终只能是家禽,更不用说什么鸡了。这些话不能帮助人们迫切想记住的音乐公鸡,结果是一个损失,除了书面从机械的“oo”声音。至于母鸡,他们只能记住他们在每次结束后,它是在“咯咯”的“咯咯”停止呼叫。

《瓦尔登湖》,怎么能有这么多野生动物?每天似乎作者,而不是他们说的名字。对蚂蚁很熟悉,但是蚂蚁就像士兵一样如何啊,使蚂蚁战争害怕阅读轻视的小生物。可爱的羽翼未丰的鹧鸪的人,他们只服从母亲的本能和自己的俄亥俄州,身体的长的和叶子的丰满,保持着相同的姿势,在那里别动,当一个陌生人或跟随它时,它继续保持不动,或者把你的眼睛干净。可怕,当然,大多数潜水,它总是发出笑声,当它是来自这个湖的第一次潜水,观察员很多狩猎或之后很多乐趣。它是什么,你可以到湖底去钓鱼。

毕竟人类的动物是啊,只是高级动物.作者预测,人类进步的结果必须是放弃肉食,正如野蛮对待文明的人之后,人们放弃坏习惯,如吃饭。我不知道人类没有一天不放弃肉,它对兔子的叫声很好奇。在书中,作者说:兔子到最后,真理是一个孩子的哭声。对兔子来说,最深刻的印象是树撞上了一只野兔,但没有我们曾经是一个可怜的兔子的书面记录。